scholarly journals CARUT MARUT PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI

2021 ◽  
pp. 1179
Author(s):  
Stefany Ismantara ◽  
Raden Ajeng Diah Puspa Sari ◽  
Cecilia Elvira ◽  
Rahaditya Rahaditya

Corruption is the abuse of power for private gain that dangers various aspects in a country. Recently, corruption case that eroded the moral legitimacy of law enforcement officers had been revealed. The purpose of this article is to evaluate law enforcement against corruption by public officials in Indonesia as well as measures to overcome its problems effectively. The methodology used in this research is normative legal research which focused on secondary data approach. The injustice that includes weak sentencing regarding the bribery case of Pinangki Sirna Malasari had caught the public's attention for the lack of impactful sentencing. This injustice makes more potential corruptors who are ignorant of the law. Indonesia’s law enforcement agencies are considered to have high tolerance for corruption cases, and this principle of conditional justice has become common knowledge for the people. Corruption has the potential to destroy the nation’s morale, hinder economic development, and trigger anarchism. The government and society must synergize in instilling an anti-corruption mindset towards themselves and the younger generation. Surveillance towards government institutions must be strengthened with public participation. Intervention of president as the highest authority is needed when there’s injustice under his realm of authority. Formulation of a supporting legislation and establishment of anti-corruption institutions in every government or state agencies are needed. In order to create a government that is free of corruption, realization of anti-corruption law in Indonesia had to be done seriously. Korupsi adalah penyalahgunaan kekuasaan untuk kepentingan pribadi yang membahayakan berbagai aspek kehidupan. Belum lama ini, terkuak kasus korupsi yang mengikis legitimasi moral aparat penegak hukum. Karya tulis ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji bagaimana penegakan hukum terhadap tindak pidana korupsi oleh oknum pejabat publik di Indonesia, serta langkah-langkah pemberantasan korupsi secara efektif. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penyusunan artikel ini adalah metode penelitian hukum normatif yang berfokus pengumpulan data sekunder. Ketidakadilan tuntutan hukum akan kasus penyuapan Pinangki Sirna Malasari menyita perhatian publik karena tuntutan pidana yang kurang memadai terlepas dari pelanggaran kode etik yang dilakukan sebagai aparat penegak hukum negara.. Jika ketidakadilan ini terus terjadi, akan muncul banyak koruptor potensial bebal hukum yang menjadi awal bagi kehancuran negara. Apabila implementasi penegakan hukum tidak maksimal, maka nilai dari hukum tersebut akan berkurang. Lembaga penegakan hukum di Indonesia dinilai memiliki toleransi yang tinggi terhadap kasus korupsi, dan prinsip keadilan bersyarat ini sudah menjadi pengetahuan umum bagi rakyat. Korupsi dapat menghancurkan moral bangsa, menghambat pembangunan ekonomi, serta memicu anarkisme. Pemerintah dan masyarakat harus bersinergi dalam menanamkan pola pikir anti korupsi terhadap diri sendiri dan para generasi muda. Transparansi dan pengawasan terhadap lembaga-lembaga pemerintahan harus diperkuat dengan adanya partisipasi masyarakat. Presiden sebagai pemegang kekuasaan tertinggi wajib turun tangan ketika terdapat ketidakadilan yang terjadi di bawah rumpunnya. Dibutuhkan perumusan legislasi yang mendukung dan pembuatan lembaga pemberantas korupsi di setiap badan penyelenggara negara. Demi mengusahakan suatu pemerintahan yang bersih dari korupsi, penegakan hukum atas tindak pidana korupsi di Indonesia harus direalisasikan dengan sungguh-sungguh.

2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zainal Asikin

This research is aimed at exploring an appropriate solution for various conflicts in land use, particularly in optimizing the utilization of the neglected land in Gili Terawangan, Lombok Island.  This solution is required to avoid potential horizontal conflicts among people, companies and government since 1993. Conflict over land in Lombok Island in general and Gili Terawangan particularly shows several factors; first, the wrong policy in the area of land (especially in tourist areas); second, the infirm attitude of the Party and the Government Land Office in the enforcement of laws; third, the jealousy of Gili Terawangan natives as cultivators; fourth, less responsibility employers (who acquire cultivating right); fifth, the absence of law protection for Gili Terawangan natives; sixth, the arrogant attitude of law enforcement officers. The comprehensive and final resolution to the conflicts of land use could only be achieved if: (i) the people, who already control and use or manage the land from time to time, are provided certainty on managing and optimizing the land based on the principles of welfare, justice, equity, efficiency and sustainability; (ii) the selection and determination of the companies that will be granted the right to cultivate (HGU) and the right to build (HGB) should be conducted based on the transparent principle. In this respect, the government could establish an independent team that involves all components of society and higher education.Key words: land dispute, tourism area, agrarian law.


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 318
Author(s):  
Ani Yunita

Efforts to increase public awareness of the law are not only carried out on legal development but also on economic development, given the condition of Indonesia's economy leading to complex social problems. Referring to the above issue, the understanding towards the Indonesian people is necessary  to carry out economic development in accordance with the objectives of Indonesia's economic development to increase the welfare of the community. The article aimed to investigate the efforts to increase public legal awareness in supporting legal development and economic development in order to realize welfare. The method in this research was normative juridical by using descriptive qualitative analysis. In relation, secondary data were obtained from primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. The results proved that increasing public legal awareness in legal and economic development should be conducted by the government and all parties involved. Hence the government and law enforcement officers can proceed through counseling, legal information, assistance and guidance so that people understand the importance of legal and economic development in order to realize order, certainty, justice and community welfare.


2012 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 207
Author(s):  
Slamet Tri Wahyudi

Law enforcement without direction and not based on the three pillars of the justice of law, legal certainty and the benefits to society can break the law anyway even violate human rights. As one of the policies of the government that are not considered mencerminakan the values of justice and disturbing for the people, the government policy that acts of omission or delay in the application of the death penalty. This research is a normative legal normative juridical approach. The data collected is secondary data were analyzed using qualitative methods juridical analysis. Based on these results it can be concluded that in the application of the death penalty there are serious legal issues, this is due to government policies that commit omission or delay in the execution of the death penalty is a violation of human rights as stipulated in Article 28 of the 1945 Constitution. Keywords: Death penalty, Justice, Legal Certainty, Law


2020 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 117-134
Author(s):  
Serguei Cheloukhine ◽  
Nesibeli Kalkayeva ◽  
Tima Khvedelidze ◽  
A.R. Bizhanova

This study examines crime and corruption among Russian law enforcement agencies after 2009 Police Reforms (henceforth referred to as Reforms). These Reforms sought to curb corruption at all levels of the Russian civil service and among uniformed law enforcement personnel. Many law enforcement officers thought that the rebranding of the militsiya as “politsiya” would have a transformational effect within the organization as well as how others perceived it. Ultimately, the rebranding effort failed; the only concrete changes were the organization's name and its personnel's uniforms. In fact, the Reforms seem to have contributed to even more corruption and abuse of power, as well as an expansion of the Ministry of Interior's ties to corrupt networks.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 40
Author(s):  
FX.Joko Priyono

Electrical and electronic waste (e-waste) are dangerous for human health and environment. The e-waste may comes from both external (import) and domestic industries. Batam as part of Indonesia jurisdiction have been a place of e-waste dumping. The e-waste mostly comes from Singapore. The rest is from Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam. The influx of electronic waste is done through smuggling at certain place. Police actually knows about the smuggling but not take any action. This crimes was backed up by any army and police. It reflects the ineffectiveness of law enforcement in Batam regarding e-waste smuggling. The ignorance causes the environment and human health is not well protected. Lack of understanding of legal knowledge by law enforcement agencies should be a particular concern for the government. On the other hand, for the people of Batam, e-waste still have economic value. Therefore, they don’t care about the menace of e-waste to human health and environment. The government should develop them in order to manage e-waste properly. The government may refer to the Government of India's Bangalore city with regard to how the people manage e-waste. 


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 645
Author(s):  
Dhanar Dhono Vernandhie ◽  
Sri Kusriyah Kusriyah

This study describes the applicability of Qanun of Aceh No. 6 of 2014 on the Jinayat law (Qanun of Jinayat) in the order of legislation in Indonesia. Therefore this study to analyze these issues, to examine the legality principle as stated in Article 72 of the Qanun of Jinayat and the rule of law by applying the Qanun of Jinayat. This study uses normative research approach, by analyzing the legal ingredients of primary legal materials, secondary and tertiary. The results and discussion of the research was that Qanun of Jinayat not contrary to the order of Indonesian legislation, both formal legislative process and substantive elements of the rule of law which includes setting legal subjects, actions and sanctions of criminalization. Applicability of Qanun of Jinayat also related to three factors, namely philosophical which is a reflection of the values of the people of Aceh, sociological factors are the result of legal politics of the Government of the Republic of Indonesia and the Free Aceh Movement and the factors juridical is the order of the constitution and legislation that higher. Qanun of Jinayat law enforcement requires the law enforcement agencies, particularly the police for continued and consistent enforcement in order to create legal certainty. Suggestions can be submitted is law enforcement-led policy-making and increased synergies between law enforcement agencies in law enforcement for action based on Qanun of Jinayat Jarimah regulated in Qanun of Jinayat.Keywords: Qanun of Jinayat in Aceh; Legality; Legislation; Law Enforcement.�


Author(s):  
Aryan Babele

Abstract The onset of technological innovations such as Big Data and Analytics is changing the ways in which law enforcement agencies police and investigate crimes in India. Pervasive technologies like smartphones, closed-circuit cameras, etc, coupled with such innovations have augmented abilities of law enforcement to identify, monitor and predict suspicious individuals and activities. However, the expansive adoption of intrusive technologies for law enforcement challenge the statutory and the constitutional limits on mass surveillance. Also, the government has not been forthcoming in disclosing details about the extent and the ambition of such surveillance technologies. The secrecy has resulted in an informational asymmetry between the people and the government which raises profound concerns of mistrust, transparency and public-accountability. This article examines the feasibility of the ‘national security’ argument that law enforcement agencies normatively use to justify such secrecy of their surveillance powers. They argue that such disclosures may negatively affect their investigational strategies and render them susceptible to circumvention, such that it may be a risk to ‘national security’. The article analyses such ‘national security’ secrecy claims that currently exist without any proper surveillance law and external oversight. The article seeks to recommend meaningful approaches to limit the over-broad ‘national security’ secrecy claims and initiate an informed public conversation on expansive tech-enabled surveillance practices of the Indian government.


ADALAH ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Abdul Aziz ◽  
Tomy Michael

Abstract:The rule of law is obliged to uphold the values or principles that guide the implementation of the government and its law enforcement, one of which is the principle of democracy. The obvious application of the principle of democracy is elections. Election is a process of holding people's sovereignty in order to fill positions in a government based on direct, general, free, confidential, honest, and fair. In the general election it is expected that the election participants will be neutral in choosing a candidate for leader or representative of the people. Whereas many public officials such as the Governor use power to help their partners in various ways, one of which is ensuring their support for their counterparts. Because the governor's voice greatly affects the community as well as the State Civil Apparatus.Keywords: Election, Neutrality, GovernorAbstrak:Negara hukum diharuskan untuk menjunjung nilai-nilai atau asas-asas yang menjadi pedoman penyelenggaran pemerintah dan penegakan hukumnya, yang salah satunya adalah asas demokrasi. Penerapan asas demokrasi yang nampak jelas ialah pemilihan umum. Pemilihan umum merupakan proses penyelenggaran kedaulatan rakyat dalam rangka mengisi jabatan-jabatan dalam suatu pemerintahan yang berasaskan langsung, umum, bebas, rahasia, jujur, dan adil. Dalam pemilihan umum diharapkan peserta pemilu bersikap Netral dalam memilih calon pemimpin atau wakil rakyat. Sedangkan banyak sekali pejabat publik seperti Gubernur yang menggunakan kekuasaan untuk membantu rekan separtainya dengan berbagai cara, yang salah satunya memastikan dukungannya terhadap rekan separtainya. Dikarenakan suara gubernur sangat mempengaruhi masyarakat maupun para Aparatur Sipin Negara.Kata Kunci: Pemilu, Netralitas, Gubernur 


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 9-10
Author(s):  
Stanislav Eftemij

The theoretical and practical difficulties in using criminal law measures against law enforcement officers who exceed power or official authority are studied here. The types of law enforcement agencies of Ukraine are clarified, and the signs of division of their system are described. The criteria for determining the status of law enforcement officers are established, and the features that distinguish an official from the support staff are emphasized. Finally, the most common disadvantages enshrined in the Criminal Code of Ukraine in terms of liability for abuse of power or official authority by law enforcement officers are analysed. The concepts of law enforcement officers, persons carrying out law enforcement activities, persons endowed with law enforcement powers, executors of law enforcement functions and the meaning and instances of their application in domestic legislation are also investigated. In light of the study results and the requirements of current criminal law, including the positions of criminal law scholars, suggestions for possible ways to eliminate existing regulatory shortcomings are provided.


2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayunita Nur Rohanawati

AbstractThis study aims to determine the social security system adopted by Indonesia, see Indonesia as a function of the welfare state as mandated by the 1945 Constitution has not done well, and to know the view of progressive legal theory legislation related to social security in providing solutions to the problems of social security the workforce. This research is devoted to the study of normative legal systematics, which is intended to determine the implementation of a theory of the legal conditions that exist in society. Results of this study produces a secondary data. The data obtained from the document collection process or library materials. Of the collection process, the data were analyzed qualitatively, systematically arranged, and presented descriptively. The results showed that Indonesia is still not able to fully administer social security for the people, where social security is still a “black and white” but the State has not been able in practice to assume responsibility for the implementation of social security as a whole. About social security, the Government is still not able to provide significant changes to the equalization gain social security for the workers, but changes in social security regulations on labor is performed repeatedly. Necessary party whom dared to take a policy or decisions that benefit the workers to realize the welfare of the workers. Parties reffered to the law is used as a progressive peeler, is a party that has an important role that enterpreneurs and the Industrial Relations Court Judge.Keywords: Social Security, Labour, Progressive LawIntisariPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui sistem jaminan sosial yang dianut Indonesia, melihat fungsi Indonesia sebagai negara kesejahteraan sesuai amanat Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 belum terlaksana dengan baik, serta untuk mengetahui teori hukum progresif memandang peraturan perundang-undangan terkait jaminan sosial tenaga kerja dalam memberikan solusi atas permasalahan jaminan sosial tenaga kerja tersebut.Penelitian ini bersifat normatif yang dikhususkan pada penelitian sistematika hukum, yang dimaksudkan untuk mengetahui implementasi pelaksanaan suatu teori terhadap kondisi hukum yang ada di masyarakat. Hasil penelitian ini menghasilkan suatu data sekunder. Data tersebut diperoleh dari proses pengumpulan dokumen atau bahan pustaka. Dari proses pengumpulan tersebut, data yang diperoleh dianalisis secara kualitatif disusun secara sistematis dan disajikan secara deskriptif.Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Indonesia masih belum mampu secara seutuhnya menyelenggarakan jaminan sosial bagi rakyat, dimana jaminan sosial tersebut masih sebatas “hitam diatas putih” namun, negara belum mampu dalam pelaksanaannya untuk mengemban tanggung jawab pelaksanaan jaminan sosial tersebut secara utuh. Tentang jaminan sosial tenaga kerja, pemerintah masih belum mampu memberikan perubahan yang signifikan terhadap pemerataan perolehan jaminan sosial tenaga kerja bagi para pekerja tersebut, padahal perubahan peraturan tentang jaminan sosial tenaga kerja tersebut berulang kali dilakukan. Diperlukan pihak yang berani untuk mengambil suatu kebijakan atau keputusan yang bermanfaat bagi pekerja demi terwujudnya kesejahteraan bagi pekerja. Pihak sebagaimana dimaksud jika hukum progresif yang digunakan sebagai alat pengupas, adalah pihak yang memiliki peran penting yaitu pengusaha dan Hakim Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial.Kata Kunci: Jaminan Sosial, Tenaga Kerja, Hukum Progresif.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document