scholarly journals KAJIAN PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP TINDAKAN PENGANIAYAAN HEWAN DAN EKSPLOITASI SATWA LANGKA

2021 ◽  
pp. 1189
Author(s):  
Stefany Ismantara ◽  
Raden Ajeng Diah Puspa Sari ◽  
Cecilia Elvira ◽  
Jeane Netlje Sally

Animal cruelty is an immoral crime that usurps animal rights, while exploitation of endangered animals is an act that has the potential to kill biodiversity in its country. The purpose of this article is to evaluate law enforcement against animal cruelty in Indonesia and its obstacles. The methodology used in this research is normative legal research which focused on secondary data approach. Although laws that regulate these criminal acts exist, such as Article 302 Criminal Code which explains the prohibition of actions that are detrimental to animal health, Law 5/1990 concerning conservation of the living natural resources and its ecosystem, added with Law18/2009 concerning husbandry and animal health, criminal cases regarding maltreatment and exploitation of circus animals, also abuse to killing pets and hunting of protected wildlife are still rampant. This could happen because of weak law enforcement that prevents deterrence. Criminal sanctions given to the perpetrators of animal cruelty are considered very light and justice for animal welfare is almost non existent. Factors that cause weak law enforcement are unsupportive constitutions, law enforcers, law facilities, its country community, and the legal culture factor. In order to overcome this matter, formulation of appropriate law to ensure legal certainty, a supportive constitution, education about biodiversity to the community, a proper surveillance system, assertiveness in law enforcement officers, and availability of adequate facilities are needed. Penganiayaan terhadap hewan merupakan suatu tindak kejahatan asusila yang merampas hak hewan. Sementara eksploitasi satwa langka adalah suatu tindakan yang berpotensi mematikan keanekaragaman hayati dalam negara. Penulisan ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana penegakan hukum terhadap pelaku penganiayaan hewan dan eksploitasi satwa langka di Indonesia, serta faktor penghambatnya. Metode penelitian yang digunakan untuk menyusun artikel ini adalah metode penelitian hukum normatif yang berfokus pengumpulan data sekunder. Walau sudah ada peraturan perundang-undangan yang mengatur tindak pidana tersebut, seperti pada Pasal 302 KUHP yang membahas mengenai larangan perbuatan yang merugikan kesehatan hewan, UU 5/1990 tentang Konservasi Sumber Daya Alam Hayati dan Ekosistemnya, ditambah dengan UU 18/2009 tentang Peternakan dan Kesehatan Hewan, kasus-kasus seperti penganiayaan dan eksploitasi hewan sirkus, juga penganiayaan hingga pembunuhan terhadap hewan peliharaan dan perburuan satwa liar yang dilindungi masih saja marak terjadi. Hal ini diakibatkan oleh penegakan hukum yang lemah sehingga efek jera gagal dimunculkan. Sanksi pidana yang diberikan kepada pelaku tindak pidana dinilai sangat ringan dan eksistensi keadilan bagi kesejahteraan hewan hampir tidak ada. Penegakan hukum yang lemah disebabkan oleh faktor Undang-Undang, penegak hukum, sarana dan fasilitas, faktor masyarakat, dan faktor budaya hukum. Dibutuhkan perumusan suatu aturan yang menjamin kepastian hukum untuk mendongkrak efektivitas hukum, penyuluhan masyarakat, sistem pengawasan yang memadai, ketegasan dari para aparat penegak hukum, dan ketersediaan fasilitas dan sarana yang memadai.

Rechtsidee ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roby Satya Nugraha ◽  
Sri Ayu Astuti

The purpose of this legal research is to explain the first discussion, namely how to implement law enforcement against criminal conspiracy (samenspanning) which has been regulated in the Criminal Code and the Criminal Procedure Code. Second How is the imposition of sanctions for criminal conspiracy charges regulated in the Criminal Code in case Number: 293K / Pid / 2016. This type of research is normative research which is descriptive-analytical in nature, using secondary data with data collection techniques through library research and processing data qualitatively, it is concluded that law enforcement against criminal conspiracy is carried out by penal measures, penal measures are one of the efforts to enforce the law or all actions taken by law enforcement officials that focus more on eradication after a crime is committed under criminal law, namely criminal sanctions which constitute a threat to the perpetrator. The stages in this way include investigation, further investigation, prosecution, and so on, which in this case is part of criminal politics. The functionalization of criminal law is an effort to tackle crime through rational criminal law enforcement with the aim of creating the fulfillment of a sense of justice and efficiency. The imposition of sanctions Criminal sanctions imposed if a person has been proven to have committed a criminal act of treason can be punished with a criminal sentence contained in Article 106 of the Criminal Code with the threat of life imprisonment or twenty years in prison.


2012 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 63
Author(s):  
Slamet Tri Wahyudi

Interception is an act that violates human rights is therefore authorized the interception can only be done by law enforcement officers. In reality interception authority by police to deviate from the provisions that have been mandated by law. This research is a normative legal normative juridical approach. The data collected is secondary data were analyzed using qualitative methods juridical analysis. Based on this study it can be concluded that the juridical consequences of the actions of police conduct authority lapses in implementing the interception an act that is against the law and may be subject to criminal sanctions, it is based on a systematic interpretation of Article 31 paragraph (3), the law enforcement officers who perform deviation authority interception the position equivalent to ordinary people who do the interception as stipulated in Article 31 paragraph (1). So the police action could be sanctioned as provided for in Article 31, paragraph 1 in conjunction with Article 47 of Law ITE. Keywords: Deviation, authorized, Interception, Law enforcement


2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 90
Author(s):  
Cahya Wulandari

<p>Penanggulangan perkara pidana yang terjadi di tengah masyarakat dapat diselesaikan dengan dua metode, yaitu penal dan non penal. Penyelesaian secara non penal salah satunya merupakan Mediasi Penal. Mediasi penal sendiri lahir dari budaya yang ada di dalam masyarakat sehingga kandungan nilai-nilainya sesuai dengan karakteristik Bangsa Indonesia. Namun penerapan mediasi penal ini belum memiliki landasan yuridis yang kuat sehingga perlu diteliti lebih lanjut apa model mediasi yang digunakan serta bagaimana peran aparat penegak hukum. Dalam artikel ini akan dipaparkan proses penyelesaian perkara pidana melalui mediasi penal di tingkat penyidikan dan peran aparat penegak hukum dalam proses mediasi penal. Data pendukung artikel ini menggunakan hasil penelitian dengan jenis kualitatif dan metode pendekatan yuridis sosiologis yang mendasarkan pada data primer dan data sekunder. Pada dasarnya, mediasi penal telah familiar dilaksanakan ditingkat kepolisian didasarkan pada Surat Kapolri No Pol: B/3022/XII/2009/SDEOPS tanggal 14 Desember 2009 tentang Penanganan Kasus Melalui <em>Alternatif Dispute Resolution</em> dengan bentuk mediasi penal yang digunakan adalah <em>victim offender mediation</em>. Model VOM ini dianggap paling layak untuk diterapkan karena mempertemukan antara kedua belah pihak sehingga mengakomodir kepentingan para pihak demi terwujudnya keadilan restoratif.</p><p>Overcoming criminal cases that occur in the middle of society can be solved by two methods, namely reasoning and non-punishment. Non-reasoning settlement is one of them is Penal Mediation. The reasoning mediation itself is born from the culture that exists in society so that the content of its values is in accordance with the characteristics of the Indonesian Nation. However, the application of this reasoning mediation does not yet have a strong juridical basis so it needs to be investigated further what the mediation model is used and how the role of law enforcement officers is. In this article will be presented the process of solving criminal cases through reasoning mediation at the level of investigation and the role of law enforcement officers in the process of judicial mediation. Supporting data for this article uses the results of research with qualitative types and sociological juridical approaches that base on primary data and secondary data. Basically, the reasoning mediation is familiar is carried out at the police level based on National Police Chief No Pol: B / 3022 / XII / 2009 / SDEOPS dated December 14, 2009 concerning Case Handling through Dispute Resolution Alternatives with the form of reasoning mediation that is victim offender mediation. This VOM model is considered the most feasible to implement because it brings together the two parties so that it accommodates the interests of the parties in order to realize restorative justice.</p>


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 607-610
Author(s):  
Ketut Danu Yudistira ◽  
Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi ◽  
Luh Putu Suryani

The environmental condition in Klungkung Regency has shown some signs of increasing environmental damage and pollution every year. To maintain and preserve the environment by the surrounding community, the Klungkung Regency Government issued Regional Regulation Number 2 of 2010 concerning Control of Environmental Damage and Pollution. The purposes of this study are to examine the effectiveness of Perda No. 2 of 2010 and to examine the obstacles in enforcing Perda No. 2 of 2010. This study was designed with empirical legal research with a statutory and conceptual approach. Data were collected through field interview techniques. The data used are primary and secondary data. After the research data was collected, the researchers then analyzed using descriptive qualitative methods. The results showed that the effectiveness of the Regional Regulation in an effort to stop the level of pollution on the Watu Klotok beach with preventive and repressive efforts through. Administrative sanctions in the form of verbal warnings, written warnings, criminal sanctions or civil fines for environmental damage or pollution. The obstacles in implementing this regional regulation are law enforcement officers, community culture, economy and public awareness. So that the effectiveness of the regulation has not been implemented effectively by law enforcers in terms of imposing sanctions. Therefore, the Klungkung Regency Government must be more firm and wise in implementing the existing legal regulations.


2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 90
Author(s):  
Cahya Wulandari

<p>Penanggulangan perkara pidana yang terjadi di tengah masyarakat dapat diselesaikan dengan dua metode, yaitu penal dan non penal. Penyelesaian secara non penal salah satunya merupakan Mediasi Penal. Mediasi penal sendiri lahir dari budaya yang ada di dalam masyarakat sehingga kandungan nilai-nilainya sesuai dengan karakteristik Bangsa Indonesia. Namun penerapan mediasi penal ini belum memiliki landasan yuridis yang kuat sehingga perlu diteliti lebih lanjut apa model mediasi yang digunakan serta bagaimana peran aparat penegak hukum. Dalam artikel ini akan dipaparkan proses penyelesaian perkara pidana melalui mediasi penal di tingkat penyidikan dan peran aparat penegak hukum dalam proses mediasi penal. Data pendukung artikel ini menggunakan hasil penelitian dengan jenis kualitatif dan metode pendekatan yuridis sosiologis yang mendasarkan pada data primer dan data sekunder. Pada dasarnya, mediasi penal telah familiar dilaksanakan ditingkat kepolisian didasarkan pada Surat Kapolri No Pol: B/3022/XII/2009/SDEOPS tanggal 14 Desember 2009 tentang Penanganan Kasus Melalui <em>Alternatif Dispute Resolution</em> dengan bentuk mediasi penal yang digunakan adalah <em>victim offender mediation</em>. Model VOM ini dianggap paling layak untuk diterapkan karena mempertemukan antara kedua belah pihak sehingga mengakomodir kepentingan para pihak demi terwujudnya keadilan restoratif.</p><p><strong> </strong></p><p>Overcoming criminal cases that occur in the middle of society can be solved by two methods, namely reasoning and non-punishment. Non-reasoning settlement is one of them is Penal Mediation. The reasoning mediation itself is born from the culture that exists in society so that the content of its values is in accordance with the characteristics of the Indonesian Nation. However, the application of this reasoning mediation does not yet have a strong juridical basis so it needs to be investigated further what the mediation model is used and how the role of law enforcement officers is. In this article will be presented the process of solving criminal cases through reasoning mediation at the level of investigation and the role of law enforcement officers in the process of judicial mediation. Supporting data for this article uses the results of research with qualitative types and sociological juridical approaches that base on primary data and secondary data. Basically, the reasoning mediation is familiar is carried out at the police level based on National Police Chief No Pol: B / 3022 / XII / 2009 / SDEOPS dated December 14, 2009 concerning Case Handling through Dispute Resolution Alternatives with the form of reasoning mediation that is victim offender mediation. This VOM model is considered the most feasible to implement because it brings together the two parties so that it accommodates the interests of the parties in order to realize restorative justice.</p><p> </p>


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 571
Author(s):  
Sulistyo Utomo ◽  
Ira Alia Maerani

This research aims to identify and analyze the existence of the application of criminal penalties in the handling of criminal cases Child Protection in Indonesia and analyze the effectiveness of criminal fines when viewed from the perspective of children as victims of crime.Method used is socio-juridical using primary and secondary data. Primary data collection technique is done with the interview, and secondary data by reading, reviewing and analyzing primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, tertiary legal materials with qualitative analysis techniques, interpreted logically and systematically and drawn conclusions.Based on the survey results revealed that the existence of the application of criminal penalties in the handling of criminal cases Child Protection in Indonesia criminal fines in criminal prospects are just as an alternative or substitute for imprisonment or confinement. And effectiveness this penalty has not run optimally because the defendant would prefer to replace the criminal penalties to imprisonment.The conclusion of this thesis is that the implementation or execution of criminal penalties in Indonesia have not been effective or not maximized because law enforcement or judges tend to prefer the imprisonment of the criminal finesKeywords: Criminal Fines; Criminal Prison; Children.


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 318
Author(s):  
Ani Yunita

Efforts to increase public awareness of the law are not only carried out on legal development but also on economic development, given the condition of Indonesia's economy leading to complex social problems. Referring to the above issue, the understanding towards the Indonesian people is necessary  to carry out economic development in accordance with the objectives of Indonesia's economic development to increase the welfare of the community. The article aimed to investigate the efforts to increase public legal awareness in supporting legal development and economic development in order to realize welfare. The method in this research was normative juridical by using descriptive qualitative analysis. In relation, secondary data were obtained from primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. The results proved that increasing public legal awareness in legal and economic development should be conducted by the government and all parties involved. Hence the government and law enforcement officers can proceed through counseling, legal information, assistance and guidance so that people understand the importance of legal and economic development in order to realize order, certainty, justice and community welfare.


Author(s):  
Dmitry Ovchinnikov

Currently, the economic sector of public relations is characterized by exceptional criminality. One of the main phenomena responsible for this is illegal money cashing. Almost every business entity considers it acceptable and even necessary to resort to various criminal schemes for obtaining unaccounted cash and tax evasion. The very type of this crime has actually become a thriving and profitable business, which consists in providing services for withdrawing funds from legal circulation. While the existing judicial and investigative practice in the issue of countering this phenomenon has not yet developed a clear answer about the need for appropriate qualifications. There are about a dozen articles of the criminal law in which law enforcement officers try to find the correct legal assessment, and at present, article 172 of the Criminal code of the Russian Federation “Illegal banking activities” deserves special attention.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 363
Author(s):  
Yaris Adhial Fajrin ◽  
Ach. Faisol Triwijaya

<em>The paper aimed to analyze the position of defamation as a complaint delict in the ITE Law and  the chances of applying penal mediation in the settlement of criminal defamation charges in the ITE Law. This research uses a normative legal research with qualitative analysis</em><em> techniques. The research result shows that defamation in the field of ITE is a complaint delict that the settlement of the case can be done through the Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) outside the court through penal mediation mechanism. The settlement of criminal cases through penal mediation has been in line with the direction of the renewal of Indonesian criminal law which is moving towards improving the impact of a criminal act as part of the purpose of criminalization. Penal mediation that promotes the values of consensus deliberation is also in line with the basic values of Pancasila, to encourage peace between the conflicting parties and improve the reputation, self-esteem, and dignity of victims damaged by defamation committed by the perpetrators. The advantages of penal mediation have not been followed by the rule of law of the event that regulates specifically the procedure of penal mediation so that not a few cases of defamation are ultimately decided by criminal sanctions to the perpetrators. Therefore, the mechanism of penal mediation needs to be regulated in the Indonesian Criminal Code in the future, to provide guarantees of a fair and beneficial criminal settlement for all parties, as well as a guarantee of the right to free responsible speech.</em>


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 237
Author(s):  
Sumaryono Sumaryono ◽  
Sri Kusriyah Kusriyah

Fraudulent criminal acts that have been regulated in the Criminal Code (KUHP) with various modes, one of which is fraud by shamans with a multiplied money mode has made law enforcers increasingly have to rack their brains to be able to prove it. This study aims to examine and analyze law enforcement by the judge in decision No.61 / Pid.B / 2019 / PN.Blora with consideration of the criminal elements. The research method used is a sociological juridical approach. The specifications of the study were conducted using descriptive analytical methods. The data used for this study are primary and secondary data. The data consists of primary data and secondary data using field research methods, interviews, and literature studies. Based on the research it was concluded that the case ruling number 61 / Pid.B / 2019 / PN Bla with a fraud case with shamanism practices in the mode of duplicating the judge's money considering that the Defendants have been indicted by the Public Prosecutor with alternative indictments, so the Panel of Judges paid attention to the facts The aforementioned law decides on the first alternative indictment as regulated in Article 378 of the Criminal Code Jo Article 55 paragraph (1) of the 1st Criminal Code by considering the elements of that article.Keywords: Criminal Law Enforcement; Fraud; Multiple Money.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document