LAND DISPUTE SETTLEMENT POST LAW NO. 2 OF 2012;  GLAGAH VILLAGE CASE STUDY RELATED TO NYIA AIRPORT

The location for the New Yogyakarta International Airport (NYIA) construction involved in land disputes during the land acquisition process. The land acquisition will always lead to disputes or conflicts with the affected people. It is even more complicated if, in the development process, the ruling elite intervenes, external forces outside the local community that are not directly related to the development. This article deals with the question of the government's public perceptions of the legal polemic of land dispute settlement based on Law No.2 of 2012, and concentrates to examine a new model of land dispute resolution from the perspective of affected communities against NYIA. This research is normative-empirical based on primary and secondary data, namely a literature study, field study, using purposive sampling with interviews, FGD, observation, and qualitative descriptive analysis. The result showed the failure of formal litigation and non-litigation approaches offered by Law No.2 of 2012 to resolve the disputes fairly. Village discussions based on local wisdom as a new model for equitable land dispute resolution needs a political review of Law No. 2 of 2012. The new paradigm of agrarian reform must be based on customary law and local wisdom values in the 1945 Constitution and the Agrarian Law. Given recent controversies concerning land disputes, a law on reform and structuring the national agrarian structure, Agrarian conflict resolution law, and law of natural resources management for the community are urgently needed.

Download Full-text

PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PENGADAAN TANAH GUNA PEMBANGUNAN BANDAR UDARA INTERNASIONAL BERBASIS NILAI KEADILAN SOSIAL

NOTARIUS ◽

10.14710/nts.v12i1.23764 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 12 (1) ◽

pp. 83

Author(s):

Mia Permata Sari ◽

Suteki Suteki

Keyword(s):

Social Justice ◽

Dispute Resolution ◽

Rule Of Law ◽

Public Interest ◽

Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽

Dispute Settlement ◽

Land Acquisition ◽

The Rule Of Law ◽

The Public ◽

Land Dispute

In resolving land acquisition disputes for the public interest, it is fitting for the state to pay attention to values outside of the rule of law itself, including the value of social justice and the value of benefits to guarantee the basic rights of affected communities. This study aims to find out what factors cause the settlement of land acquisition disputes in terms of juridical aspects not reflecting the value of justice and benefit for the parties and formulating land acquisition dispute resolution models in a legal socio perspective that can realize the value of social justice and benefits for party. an appropriate method is needed that can accommodate the value of social justice and the benefits in resolving the dispute, among others, promoting the Consensus Meeting and the Need for Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) as an alternative solution. In addition, the need to calculate non-physical losses in the assessment of compensation for people who have lost their livelihoods due to land acquisition projects Keywords: Land Acquisition, Land Dispute Settlement, Public Interest AbstrakDalam penyelesaian sengketa pengadaan tanah untuk kepentingan umum sudah sepatutnya negara memperhatikan nilai-nilai diluar daripada aturan hukum itu sendiri, diantaranya nilai keadilan sosial dan nilai kemanfaatan untuk menjamin hak-hak dasar masyarakat terdampak. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk untuk mengetahui faktor apa saja yang menyebabkan penyelesaian sengketa pengadaan tanah tersebut ditinjau dari aspek yuridis belum mencerminkan nilai keadilan dan kemanfaatan bagi para pihak sertaa merumuskan model penyelesaian sengketa pengadaan tanah dalam perspektif socio legal yang dapat mewujudkan nilai keadilan sosial dan kemanfaatan bagi para pihak. dibutuhkan suatu metode yang tepat yang dapat mengakomodasi nilai keadilan sosial dan kemanfaatan dalam penyelesaian sengketa tersebut diantaranya mengedepankan Musyawarah Mufakat dan Perlunya Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) sebagai solusi alternatif.. Selain itu, perlunya memperhitungkan kerugian non fisik dalam penilaian ganti rugi sehingga, terdapat solusi bagi masyarakat yang kehilangan mata pencaharianya akibat proyek pengadaan tanah Kata Kunci : Pengadaan Tanah, Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah , Kepentingan Umum

Download Full-text

Customary Payment to Achieve A Justice in The Land Disputes

Al-'Adl ◽

10.31332/aladl.v14i1.2408 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 14 (1) ◽

pp. 57

Author(s):

Marlin Marlin ◽

Farida Patittingi ◽

Suriani BT Tolo

Keyword(s):

Dispute Resolution ◽

Indigenous People ◽

Secondary Data ◽

Customary Law ◽

Primary Data ◽

Land Dispute ◽

Land Disputes ◽

Ancient Times ◽

Sense Of Justice ◽

Comprehensive Study

The indigenous people of South Konawe highly uphold the Tolaki customary law from ancient times to the present, namely through the Kalosara media, which is considered very sacred to its existence. Land dispute resolution through customary payment has a purpose to restore disturbed conditions caused by the disputing parties. This research examines and describes the implementation of customary payments for land disputes, whether it can fulfill a sense of justice for the indigenous people of South Konawe. The research uses some secondary data through literature studies and primary data through the interview. The result indicates that the customary payment in giving a sense of justice in land disputes in South Konawe is considerably applicable. However, a comprehensive study is needed to find the justice which is aspired by the Tolaki Indigenous People in South Konawe.

Download Full-text

Kedudukan Dinas Pertanahan Aceh Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Pertanahan Pasca Perpres Nomor 23 Tahun 2015

Syiah Kuala Law Journal ◽

10.24815/sklj.v3i3.12524 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 3 (3) ◽

pp. 395-416

Author(s):

Rahmat Nofrizal ◽

Husni Jalil ◽

Muhammad Saleh

Keyword(s):

Dispute Resolution ◽

Significant Role ◽

Research Method ◽

Public Access ◽

Land Conflicts ◽

State Institutions ◽

Land Dispute ◽

Legal Standard ◽

Land Disputes ◽

Regional Land

Pada tahun 2016, Pemerintah Aceh membentuk Dinas Pertanahan Aceh yang kewenangannya mengurusi di bidang pelayanan pertanahan. Salah satu kewenangannya adalah dalam hal penyelesaian sengketa pertanahan. Pada Kenyataannya, Badan Pertanahan Nasional (BPN) juga memiliki kewenangan dalam penyelesaian sengketa pertanahan di Aceh. Terdapat tumpang tindih kewenangan dua lembaga negara dalam hal penyelesaian sengketa pertanahan di Aceh. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui kedudukan Dinas Pertanahan Aceh dalam penyelesaian sengketa pertanahan pasca Perpres Nomor 23 Tahun 2015. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif. Hasil penilitian menunjukkan bahwa kedudukan Dinas Pertanahan Aceh memiliki peranan penting dalam penyelesaian sengketa pertanahan yang terjadi di Aceh. Lahirnya Dinas Pertanahan Aceh dapat mempermudah akses masyarakat dalam hal penyelesaian konflik tanah. Disarankan DPR Aceh bersama Gubernur Aceh perlu mempercepat proses pengesahan draf Qanun Pertanahan Aceh sebagai payung hukum bagi Dinas Pertanahan Aceh dalam mengoptimalkan peran dan fungsinya terkait penyelesaian sengketa pertanahan di Aceh.In 2016, the Aceh Government formed the Regional Land Office of Aceh whose authority held government affairs in land services. One of the authorities of the Regional Land Office of Aceh is in terms of land dispute resolution and conflict. The National Land Agency (BPN) also has authority in resolving land disputes in Aceh. There are overlaps in the authority of two state institutions regarding resolving land disputes in Aceh. This study aims to determine the position of the Regional Land Office of Aceh in settlement of land disputes after the issuance of the Presidential Regulation Number 23 of 2015. This study uses a normative juridical research method. The research results show that the position of the Regional Land Office of Aceh has a significant role in resolving land disputes that occurred in Aceh. The establishment of The Regional Land Office of Aceh can facilitate public access in terms of resolving land conflicts. It is suggested that the Aceh House Representative together with the Governor of Aceh need to accelerate the process of ratifying the draft of Qanun (Islamic bylaw) of Aceh Land as a strong legal standard for the Regional Land Office of Aceh in optimizing its roles and functions related to land dispute resolution in Aceh.

Download Full-text

PELAKSANAAN MEDIASI PADA PENYELESAIAN PERCERAIAN DI PENGADILAN AGAMA KUNINGAN

UNIFIKASI Jurnal Ilmu Hukum ◽

10.25134/unifikasi.v4i2.729 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 4 (2) ◽

pp. 98

Author(s):

Fitri Purnamasari, Diding Rahmat Dan Gios Adhyaksa

Keyword(s):

Supreme Court ◽

Dispute Resolution ◽

Dispute Settlement ◽

Islamic Law ◽

Secondary Data ◽

Negotiation Process ◽

Primary Data ◽

Access To Justice ◽

Literature Study ◽

Thesis Writing

AbstractThe author conducted this research with the background of the implementation of Mediation in Kuningan Religious Court in Kuningan. The purposes of writing this paper are to know how the Implementation on Divorce Settlement in Kuningan Religious Court and to know the factors that affect the success of mediation in the Kuningan Religious Court. The method used in this research is with empirical juridical approach using primary data and secondary data and data collection techniques are interviews, observation and literature study. The results of this research are the mediation arrangements set out in the Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA ) Number 1 Year 2016 about Mediation Procedures in Courts and more specifically stipulated in the Decree of the Chief Justice Number 108 / KMA / AK / VI / 2016 on Mediation Governance at the Court. Mediation is the means of dispute resolution through the negotiation process to obtain agreement of the Parties with the assistance of the Mediator. Mediator is a Judge or any other party who has a Mediator Certificate as a neutral party assisting Parties in the negotiation process to see possible dispute resolution without resorting to the disconnection or enforcement of a settlement. Its implementation has been regulated in Law Number 1 Year 1974 about concerning Marriage, Compilation of Islamic Law, and Supreme Court RegulationNumber 1 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedure in Court. The conclusion of this thesis writing is Mediation which should be one of the alternative process of dispute settlement which can give greater access to justice to the parties in finding satisfactory dispute settlement and to fulfill the sense of justice, and become one of the effective instrument to overcome the problem of case buildup especially for the case Divorce, in the end has not been effectively implemented.Keywords: Mediation, Divorce, Marriage.�AbstrakPenulis melakukan penelitian ini dengan latar belakang yaitu bagaimana pelaksanaan Mediasi pada Pengadilan Agama Kuningan. Tujuan penulisan ini untuk mengetahui bagaimana Pelaksanaan pada Penyelesaian Perceraian di Pengadilan Agama Kuningan dan untuk mengetahui bagaimana faktor-faktor yang memepengaruhi keberhasilan mediasi di Pengadilan Agama Kuningan. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah dengan pendekatan yuridis empiris dengan menggunakan data primer dan data sekunder serta alat pengumpulan data yang digunakan melalui wawancara, observasi dan studi pustaka. Hasil penelitian ini adalah pengaturan mediasi diatur dalam Peraturan Mahkamah Agung (PERMA) Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 tentang Prosedur Mediasi di Pengadilan dan lebih spesifik diatur dalam Keputusan Ketua Mahkamah Agung Nomor : 108/KMA/AK/VI/2016 tentang Tata Kelola Mediasi di Pengadilan. Mediasi adalah cara penyelesaian sengketa melalui proses perundingan untuk memperoleh kesepakatan Para Pihak dengan dibantu oleh Mediator. Mediator adalah Hakim atau pihak lain yang memiliki Sertifikat Mediator sebagai pihak netral yang membantu Para Pihak dalam proses perundingan guna mencari berbagai kemungkinan penyelesaian sengketa tanpa menggunakan cara memutus atau memaksakan sebuah penyelesaian. Pelaksanaannya telah di atur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkwinan, Kompilasi Hukum Islam, dan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 tentang Prosedur Mediasi di Pengadilan. Kesimpulan dari penulisan skripsi ini adalah Mediasi yang seharusnya menjadi salah satu alternatif proses penyelesaian sengketa yang dapat memberikan akses keadilan yang lebbesar kepada para pihak dalam menemukan penyelesaian sengketa yang memuaskan dan mmemenuhi rasa keadilan, serta menjadi salah satu instrumen efektif mengatasi masalah penumpukan perkara khususnya untuk perkara perceraian, pada akhirnya belum efektif dilaksanakan.Kata Kunci : Mediasi, Perceraian, Perdata

Download Full-text

Analysis of National Land Board Authority on Land Dispute Which have not been Registered in The Land Office of Samarinda

Jurnal Akta ◽

10.30659/akta.v5i4.3730 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 5 (4) ◽

pp. 897

Author(s):

Robyatul Adawiyah ◽

Gunarto Gunarto

Keyword(s):

Public Awareness ◽

Public Access ◽

Public Knowledge ◽

Literature Study ◽

Land Registration ◽

The Public ◽

Land Dispute ◽

Proactive Approach ◽

Land Disputes ◽

Study Techniques

According to Article 3 letter f Presidential Regulation No. 20 of 2015 stipulates that the National Land Agency performs functions include formulation and implementation of policies in the field of control and the handling of disputes and case land. Most of land that has not been registered in BPN Samarinda because of several problems, one status each land dispute. The purpose of this study was to analyze the authority BPN Samarinda on disputed land which has not been registered and analyzing obstacles and solutions. Metode approach used in this study is a sociological juridical approach. Mechanical collection of legal materials in this study is by interview and literature study techniques, data analysis techniquesdescriptive analytic method is used.The results showed that the Authority granted to BPN in resolving land disputes is procedurally done by first conducting studies and approaches to the parties to the dispute, namely through consultation and the courts / litigation.Barriers BPN authority over land disputes that have not been registered at the BPN Samarinda is the lack of public knowledge about the land, the lack of public awareness and public access to information and services is still minimal, most people live in rural surroundings with facilities and means of transport and communications are limited. BPN solutions that can be done is through deliberative approach, but if consensus is not reached, it will be taken by the courts / litigation. Also BPN proactive approach with mobile services from village to directly deal with the public in the form of activities, socialization, education, land registration, measurement and delivery of certificates.Keywords: BPN Authority; Land Registry; Land Dispute.

Download Full-text

PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA TANAH ULAYAT YANG TELAH BERSERTIFIKAT BERDASARKAN HUKUM ADAT MALIND-ANIM

Arena Hukum ◽

10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2021.01401.8 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 14 (1) ◽

pp. 150-166

Author(s):

Ahmad Muddin ◽

◽

Hardianto Djanggih

Keyword(s):

Dispute Resolution ◽

Land Rights ◽

Customary Law ◽

Legal Certainty ◽

Legal Research ◽

Land Dispute ◽

Traditional Institutions ◽

Customary Land

Abstract This study aims to analyze dispute resolution, the dispute resolution approach that guarantees legal certainty and examine the factors that influence the construction of the settlement of land rights of the customary community of Malind-Amin. This normative and empirical legal research is analized descriptively and analytically. The results shows that the nature of customary land dispute with customary law can be resolved through positive legal mechanisms and customary law mechanisms, while dispute resolution on disputed objects that have certificates based on the release of traditional institutions through mediation, synchronization / harmonization of laws and the making of local regulations. However, efforts to resolve this have experienced various factors of internal and external obstacles.

Download Full-text

PEMBENTUKAN PENGADILAN PERTANAHAN SEBAGAI SOLUSI PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PERTANAHAN

Bina Hukum Lingkungan ◽

10.24970/bhl.v4i2.130 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 4 (2) ◽

pp. 264

Author(s):

Budi Sastra Panjaitan

Keyword(s):

Human Rights ◽

Natural Resources ◽

Dispute Resolution ◽

Low Cost ◽

Research Approach ◽

Legal Research ◽

Land Dispute ◽

Land Disputes ◽

Main Factor

ABSTRAKSengketa pertanahan tetap akan ada ketika para pihak telah memposisikan tanah sebagai faktor produksi yang utama ditambah kemudian tumpang tindihnya peraturan yang berhubungan dengan pertanahan dan sumber daya alam. Sengketa pertanahan dapat melahirkan anarkisme yang tidak jarang menimbulkan berbagai bentuk pelanggaran hak-hak asasi manusia. Pendekatan penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif, dengan kesimpulan sebagai berikut: Badan peradilan yang ada telah dipandang tidak lagi sederhana, cepat dan biaya ringan. Pengadilan pertanahan merupakan solusi guna mengatasi kebuntuan dalam penyelesaian sengketa pertanahan, pengadilan pertanahan tidak hanya sekedar formalistik-legalistik dalam mewujudkan keadilan. Keberadaan pengadilan pertanahan dibutuhkan dalam rangka terwujudnya penyelesaian sengketa pertanahan secara cepat, sistematis, sederhana, berkeadilan dan biaya ringan.Kata kunci: sengketa; pertanahan; perngadilan pertanahan.ABSTRACTLand disputes will still arise when the parties have positioned land as the main factor of production plus overlapping regulations relating to land and natural resources. Land disputes can give rise to anarchism which often results in various forms of violations of human rights. The research approach used is normative legal research, with the following conclusions: Existing judicial bodies are no longer considered simple, fast and low cost. Land court is a solution to overcome impasse in the resolution of land disputes, land court is not just formalistic-legalistic in realizing justice. The existence of a land court is needed in order to realize a land dispute resolution that is fast, systematic, simple, fair and low cost.Keywords: dispute; land; land court.

Download Full-text

Penerapan Аsаs-Аsаs Umum Pemerintаhаn yаng Bаik dаlаm Penyelesаiаn Sengketа Tanah Hak Milik

Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan ◽

10.17977/um019v6i1p35-44 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 6 (1) ◽

pp. 35

Author(s):

Dita Ernanda ◽

Istislam Istislam ◽

Yuliati Yuliati

Keyword(s):

Dispute Resolution ◽

Land Registration ◽

Land Dispute ◽

Field Assessment ◽

Data Collection And Analysis ◽

Land Disputes ◽

Good Government ◽

Application Data ◽

The Republic ◽

And Control

This study aimed to describe the procedure for resolving land disputes, the application of the General Principles of Good Government (AUPB) in land dispute resolution, and the supporting and inhibiting factors for the application of AUPB in resolving land disputes. This study used a sociological juridical approach, with the type of empirical juridical research. The procedure for resolving land disputes was through two types of applications, namely letters of public complaints and implementation of court decisions. The application of AUPB in land dispute resolution started from the application, data collection and analysis, field assessment and inspection, case exposure, case settlement reports, settlement, and implementation of settlement decisions. Supporting factors for the implementation of AUPB were the Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/Head of the National Land Agency of the Republic of Indonesia Number 11 of 2016, Section for Handling Land Problems and Control, as well as facilities and infrastructure for mediation, case titles, and transportation. The obstacle of the AUPB implementation included the inkracht decision to issue replacement certificates that had not been explicitly regulated, resulting in land registration services being blocked by the system and uncooperative parties.

Download Full-text

Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah Melalui Jual Beli Berdasarkan Hukum Adat

Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum ◽

10.22225/juinhum.1.2.2478.213-217 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 1 (2) ◽

pp. 213-217

Author(s):

I Made Krishna Dharma Kusuma ◽

Putu Gede Seputra ◽

Luh Putu Suryani

Keyword(s):

Research Method ◽

Local Community ◽

Economic Value ◽

Legal Protection ◽

Land Rights ◽

Civil Code ◽

Customary Law ◽

Literature Study ◽

The One ◽

The Village

Humans cannot be separated from the name of land, because land is the one who revives humans and living creatures around it in the progress of the current era of land has Economic Value. Land is the main and largest capital of Indonesia, land is the only capital. The problems of this study are 1) what are the procedures for the transfer of Land Rights according to Customary Law? 2) How is the power of the Law of Sale and Purchase of Property Rights on Land according to Customary Law? The research method used is a normative legal research method, with a literature study of primary and secondary legal materials. The results of the study can be concluded that: 1) the transfer of rights to land according to customary law is valid if the act of light and cash is carried out. The purpose of the sale and purchase agreement is in the presence of PPAT (Land Deed Official) and Witnesses in the transfer of rights to the land and the witness is the head of the village and the local community, which in cash means that there are two actions which are carried out simultaneously, namely the transfer of rights from the seller to the buyer and payment of prices in part or in full from the buyer to the seller. 2). The act of buying and selling that has a good intention is seen when the parties that make a sale and purchase of land rights ask to be done before the Customary Chief / local Village Chief. In the Civil Code the legal protection of buyers with good intentions, if the sale and purchase agreement is carried out based on Customary Law has been protected by the provisions of article 1338 paragraph (3) of the Civil Code.

Download Full-text

Peluang Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata Tentang Tanah Melalui Alternative Dispute Resolution

MASALAH-MASALAH HUKUM ◽

10.14710/mmh.47.1.2018.47-55 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 47 (1) ◽

pp. 47

Author(s):

Made Oka Cahyadi Wiguna

Keyword(s):

Dispute Resolution ◽

Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽

Land Rights ◽

Choice Of Law ◽

Legal Principles ◽

Land Dispute ◽

Land Disputes ◽

Civil Dispute

AbstractThe current developments, there are many land disputes that are vertical or horizontal. Issues concerning land affairs are often caused by salim claims over land rights. The intended land dispute is a civil dispute concerning the land. Achieving a win-win solution in the settlement of civil disputes over land is relatively difficult to materialize, if the settlement is resolved through a trial (litigation). The choice of law that can be chosen to obtain and realize a win-win solution in solving civil disputes over land is of course through alternative dispute resolution. By way of negotiation, mediation and conciliation. In the course of the settlement of civil disputes over land settled through alternative dispute resolution, the settlement can not ignore the applicable legal principles of the treaty. Keywords: Land civil disputes, alternative dispute resolution and principles of contract.AbstrakPerkembangan yang terjadi saat ini, banyak terjadi sengketa pertanahan yang bersifat vertikal maupun horizontal. Permasalahan mengenai pertanahan yang terjadi sering disebabkan akibat salim klaim penguasaan hak atas tanah. Sengketa tanah yang dimaksudkan adalah sengketa perdata tentang tanah. Mewujudkan win-win solution dalam penyelesaian sengketa perdata tentang tanah relatif sulit dapat terwujud, apabila penyelesaiannya diselesaikan melalui sidang peradilan (litigation). Pilihan hukum (choice of law) yang dapat dipilih untuk memperoleh dan mewujudkan win-win solution dalam menyelesaikan sengketa perdata tentang tanah tentunya adalah melalui alternative dispute resolution. dengan cara negosiasi, mediasi dan konsiliasi. Dalam rangka penyelesaian sengketa perdata tentang tanah diselesaikan melalui alternative dispute resolution, maka penyelesaiannya tidak dapat mengabaikan asas-asas hukum yang berlaku mengenai perjanjian. Kata Kunci : Sengketa perdata tanah, alternatif penyelesaian sengketa dan asas-asas perjanjian.

Download Full-text