scholarly journals Kedudukan Dinas Pertanahan Aceh Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Pertanahan Pasca Perpres Nomor 23 Tahun 2015

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 395-416
Author(s):  
Rahmat Nofrizal ◽  
Husni Jalil ◽  
Muhammad Saleh
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Significant Role ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Public Access ◽  
Land Conflicts ◽  
State Institutions ◽  
Land Dispute ◽  
Legal Standard ◽  
Land Disputes ◽  
Regional Land

Pada tahun 2016, Pemerintah Aceh membentuk Dinas Pertanahan Aceh yang kewenangannya mengurusi di bidang pelayanan pertanahan. Salah satu kewenangannya adalah dalam hal penyelesaian sengketa pertanahan. Pada Kenyataannya, Badan Pertanahan Nasional (BPN) juga memiliki kewenangan dalam penyelesaian sengketa pertanahan di Aceh. Terdapat tumpang tindih kewenangan dua lembaga negara dalam hal penyelesaian sengketa pertanahan di Aceh. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui kedudukan Dinas Pertanahan Aceh dalam penyelesaian sengketa pertanahan pasca Perpres Nomor 23 Tahun 2015. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif. Hasil penilitian menunjukkan bahwa kedudukan Dinas Pertanahan Aceh memiliki peranan penting dalam penyelesaian sengketa pertanahan yang terjadi di Aceh. Lahirnya Dinas Pertanahan Aceh dapat mempermudah akses masyarakat dalam hal penyelesaian konflik tanah. Disarankan DPR Aceh bersama Gubernur Aceh perlu mempercepat proses pengesahan draf Qanun Pertanahan Aceh sebagai payung hukum bagi Dinas Pertanahan Aceh dalam mengoptimalkan peran dan fungsinya terkait penyelesaian sengketa pertanahan di Aceh.In 2016, the Aceh Government formed the Regional Land Office of Aceh whose authority held government affairs in land services. One of the authorities of the Regional Land Office of Aceh is in terms of land dispute resolution and conflict. The National Land Agency (BPN) also has authority in resolving land disputes in Aceh. There are overlaps in the authority of two state institutions regarding resolving land disputes in Aceh. This study aims to determine the position of the Regional Land Office of Aceh in settlement of land disputes after the issuance of the Presidential Regulation Number 23 of 2015. This study uses a normative juridical research method. The research results show that the position of the Regional Land Office of Aceh has a significant role in resolving land disputes that occurred in Aceh. The establishment of The Regional Land Office of Aceh can facilitate public access in terms of resolving land conflicts. It is suggested that the Aceh House Representative together with the Governor of Aceh need to accelerate the process of ratifying the draft of Qanun (Islamic bylaw) of Aceh Land as a strong legal standard for the Regional Land Office of Aceh in optimizing its roles and functions related to land dispute resolution in Aceh.

scholarly journals Analysis of National Land Board Authority on Land Dispute Which have not been Registered in The Land Office of Samarinda

Jurnal Akta ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 897
Author(s):  
Robyatul Adawiyah ◽  
Gunarto Gunarto
Keyword(s):  
Public Awareness ◽  
Public Access ◽  
Public Knowledge ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
The Public ◽  
Land Dispute ◽  
Proactive Approach ◽  
Land Disputes ◽  
Study Techniques

According to Article 3 letter f Presidential Regulation No. 20 of 2015 stipulates that the National Land Agency performs functions include formulation and implementation of policies in the field of control and the handling of disputes and case land. Most of land that has not been registered in BPN Samarinda because of several problems, one status each land dispute. The purpose of this study was to analyze the authority BPN Samarinda on disputed land which has not been registered and analyzing obstacles and solutions. Metode approach used in this study is a sociological juridical approach. Mechanical collection of legal materials in this study is by interview and literature study techniques, data analysis techniquesdescriptive analytic method is used.The results showed that the Authority granted to BPN in resolving land disputes is procedurally done by first conducting studies and approaches to the parties to the dispute, namely through consultation and the courts / litigation.Barriers BPN authority over land disputes that have not been registered at the BPN Samarinda is the lack of public knowledge about the land, the lack of public awareness and public access to information and services is still minimal, most people live in rural surroundings with facilities and means of transport and communications are limited. BPN solutions that can be done is through deliberative approach, but if consensus is not reached, it will be taken by the courts / litigation. Also BPN proactive approach with mobile services from village to directly deal with the public in the form of activities, socialization, education, land registration, measurement and delivery of certificates.Keywords: BPN Authority; Land Registry; Land Dispute.

scholarly journals Health Waqf Land Disputes and Alternative Settlements

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 259-268
Author(s):  
Faisal
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Land Dispute ◽  
Land Disputes

The system of Waqf management is still not as expected because many land dispute problems that arise in the midst of society are caused by factors that hinder the delivery of Waqf intentions from a representative. The issue of Waqf disputes is often brought to the path of litigation (court) so that alternative channels are needed in finding a resolution. The research method used is the method of juridical law research normative with the approach of legislation. The purpose of this research is to prioritize non-litigation pathways first to resolve Waqf disputes. The results showed that the factors that cause the non-implementation of Waqf lies in administrative problems when trying to make a deed of Waqf land pledge caused by disapproval by the heirs of the representative to the management of Waqf by nadzir who lack integrity and responsiveness. Recommendations on the issue, Waqf disputes should first put forward a non-Litigation line, because the Litigation line as a last resort to find a place to resolve land disputes.  

scholarly journals PEMBENTUKAN PENGADILAN PERTANAHAN SEBAGAI SOLUSI PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PERTANAHAN

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 264
Author(s):  
Budi Sastra Panjaitan
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Natural Resources ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Research Approach ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Land Dispute ◽  
Land Disputes ◽  
Main Factor

ABSTRAKSengketa pertanahan tetap akan ada ketika para pihak telah memposisikan tanah sebagai faktor produksi yang utama ditambah kemudian tumpang tindihnya peraturan yang berhubungan dengan pertanahan dan sumber daya alam. Sengketa pertanahan dapat melahirkan anarkisme yang tidak jarang menimbulkan berbagai bentuk pelanggaran hak-hak asasi manusia. Pendekatan penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif, dengan kesimpulan sebagai berikut: Badan peradilan yang ada telah dipandang tidak lagi sederhana, cepat dan biaya ringan. Pengadilan pertanahan merupakan solusi guna mengatasi kebuntuan dalam penyelesaian sengketa pertanahan, pengadilan pertanahan tidak hanya sekedar formalistik-legalistik dalam mewujudkan keadilan. Keberadaan pengadilan pertanahan dibutuhkan dalam rangka terwujudnya penyelesaian sengketa pertanahan secara cepat, sistematis, sederhana, berkeadilan dan biaya ringan.Kata kunci: sengketa; pertanahan; perngadilan pertanahan.ABSTRACTLand disputes will still arise when the parties have positioned land as the main factor of production plus overlapping regulations relating to land and natural resources. Land disputes can give rise to anarchism which often results in various forms of violations of human rights. The research approach used is normative legal research, with the following conclusions: Existing judicial bodies are no longer considered simple, fast and low cost. Land court is a solution to overcome impasse in the resolution of land disputes, land court is not just formalistic-legalistic in realizing justice. The existence of a land court is needed in order to realize a land dispute resolution that is fast, systematic, simple, fair and low cost.Keywords: dispute; land; land court.

scholarly journals Implementasi PTSL Sebagai Upaya Pencegahan Konflik Pertanahan Di Kecamatan Ingin Jaya Kabupaten Aceh Besar

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 217
Author(s):  
M. Syuib ◽  
Sarah Diana Aulia
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Large Area ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Land Dispute ◽  
Land Disputes ◽  
Legal Uncertainty ◽  
The Government ◽  
Ownership Of Land

In order to guarantee legal certainty for land rights holders, the Government is conducting land registration program throughout Indonesia territory. The program has put an obligation to the land rights holder to register their land. The purpose of land registration is, to provide evidence for the ownership of land. The implementation mechanism of the program in regulated in the Permen ATR/BPN Number 6 of 2018 concerning Complete Systematic Land Registration (PTSL). The presence of the Permen is, in order to prevent land disputes in the community by accelerating land registration. Sub-district of Ingin Jaya, which is located in the Aceh Besar district, is one of the areas where PTSL activities are carried out. Currently, there is a large area of land in the Aceh Besar district has not been certified yet, it may cause legal uncertainty for land owner and such condition can potentially lead to land dispute. One of the indicators to claim this, are by taking land dispute cases as put on trial in the Jantho Court which has reached 32 cases from 2014 until 2019. This study aims to find out how the implementation of PTSL and its barrier in the Sub-District of Ingin Jaya, Aceh Besar. The research method is an empirical juridical research; it works by conducting observations, interviews, and documentation. The result found that the implementation of PTSL in the Sub-District of Ingin Jaya, Aceh Besar, is in accordance with Permen ATR/BPN No. 6 of 2018. However, in the ground, it is found that there are a number of obstacles which affect the successful of the PTSL program both internally and externally. Therefore, synergy and cooperation with all parties are needed so that the PTSL program in the Sub-District of Ingin Jaya can be implemented successfully in order to provide legal certainty for land rights holders, so that the land dispute can be prevented as early as possible.

scholarly journals Penerapan Аsаs-Аsаs Umum Pemerintаhаn yаng Bаik dаlаm Penyelesаiаn Sengketа Tanah Hak Milik

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 35
Author(s):  
Dita Ernanda ◽  
Istislam Istislam ◽  
Yuliati Yuliati
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Land Dispute ◽  
Field Assessment ◽  
Data Collection And Analysis ◽  
Land Disputes ◽  
Good Government ◽  
Application Data ◽  
The Republic ◽  
And Control

This study aimed to describe the procedure for resolving land disputes, the application of the General Principles of Good Government (AUPB) in land dispute resolution, and the supporting and inhibiting factors for the application of AUPB in resolving land disputes. This study used a sociological juridical approach, with the type of empirical juridical research. The procedure for resolving land disputes was through two types of applications, namely letters of public complaints and implementation of court decisions. The application of AUPB in land dispute resolution started from the application, data collection and analysis, field assessment and inspection, case exposure, case settlement reports, settlement, and implementation of settlement decisions. Supporting factors for the implementation of AUPB were the Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/Head of the National Land Agency of the Republic of Indonesia Number 11 of 2016, Section for Handling Land Problems and Control, as well as facilities and infrastructure for mediation, case titles, and transportation. The obstacle of the AUPB implementation included the inkracht decision to issue replacement certificates that had not been explicitly regulated, resulting in land registration services being blocked by the system and uncooperative parties.

scholarly journals Strategy and Management of Dispute Resolution, Land Conflicts at the Land Office of Sleman Regency

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Iswantoro Iswantoro
Keyword(s):  
Land Use ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Land Ownership ◽  
Registration System ◽  
Land Conflicts ◽  
Land Disputes ◽  
Flow Through ◽  
Legal Understanding

Complex land disputes from time to time have increased both in quality and quantity. The cause is due to the needs of increasingly complex land use while minimal land availability. In addition, the cause can be triggered by any regulations that overlap and occur disharmony in its implementation. This problem is coupled with the lack of legal understanding in society due to acts committed on its soil and the publication of the registration system, which adopts negative publications, opening the faucet lawsuit and objections from other parties on the ground registered. Inequality in land ownership and the certificate and the use of land that is not following the location permit, allotment, use, and utilization of the land made into the complex problems of land disputes. This condition needs to be made to seek justice, legal protection, and law enforcement, namely the judiciary. In addition, the settlement of land disputes can flow through administrative channels that BPN, Mediation, Reconciliation, and ADR, which action significantly contributed to the completion of land disputes. Therefore, the necessary stakeholders to these ideals can be realized. Keywords: Dispute Resolution, Land Conflicts, Land Office

scholarly journals Peluang Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata Tentang Tanah Melalui Alternative Dispute Resolution

2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 47
Author(s):  
Made Oka Cahyadi Wiguna
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Choice Of Law ◽  
Legal Principles ◽  
Land Dispute ◽  
Land Disputes ◽  
Civil Dispute

AbstractThe current developments, there are many land disputes that are vertical or horizontal. Issues concerning land affairs are often caused by salim claims over land rights. The intended land dispute is a civil dispute concerning the land. Achieving a win-win solution in the settlement of civil disputes over land is relatively difficult to materialize, if the settlement is resolved through a trial (litigation). The choice of law that can be chosen to obtain and realize a win-win solution in solving civil disputes over land is of course through alternative dispute resolution. By way of negotiation, mediation and conciliation. In the course of the settlement of civil disputes over land settled through alternative dispute resolution, the settlement can not ignore the applicable legal principles of the treaty.  Keywords: Land civil disputes, alternative dispute resolution and principles of contract.AbstrakPerkembangan yang terjadi saat ini, banyak terjadi sengketa pertanahan yang bersifat vertikal maupun horizontal. Permasalahan mengenai pertanahan yang terjadi sering disebabkan akibat salim klaim penguasaan hak atas tanah. Sengketa tanah yang dimaksudkan adalah sengketa perdata tentang tanah. Mewujudkan win-win solution dalam penyelesaian sengketa perdata tentang tanah relatif sulit dapat terwujud, apabila penyelesaiannya diselesaikan melalui sidang peradilan (litigation). Pilihan hukum (choice of law) yang dapat dipilih untuk memperoleh dan mewujudkan win-win solution dalam menyelesaikan sengketa perdata tentang tanah tentunya adalah melalui alternative dispute resolution. dengan cara negosiasi, mediasi dan konsiliasi. Dalam rangka penyelesaian sengketa perdata tentang tanah diselesaikan melalui alternative dispute resolution, maka penyelesaiannya tidak dapat mengabaikan asas-asas hukum yang berlaku mengenai perjanjian. Kata Kunci :   Sengketa perdata tanah, alternatif penyelesaian sengketa dan asas-asas    perjanjian.  

scholarly journals Models of Land Ownership in Islam: Analysis on Hadis Ihyā’ al-Mawāt

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 189
Author(s):  
Ahmad Suhendra
Keyword(s):  
Land Ownership ◽  
State Ownership ◽  
Land Conflicts ◽  
Religious Perspective ◽  
Land Dispute ◽  
Common Ownership ◽  
Land Disputes ◽  
The Status ◽  
Ownership Of Land ◽  
Individual Ownership

This article discusses land ownership from the perspective of tradition, especially the tradition of the revival of the dead earth (Iḥya ‘al-Mawāt). This relates to the land conflicts that often occur, so it requires a religious perspective in land ownership. Therefore, the issue raised is how the ownership of land in the Hadith? How Hadith provide a solution to the land dispute? To answer it used historical approach, hermeneutic, and sociology. Turns ownership in Islam there are three, namely individual ownership, common ownership and state ownership. Islam recognizes individual ownership is perfect (al-milk al-tāmm) and imperfect (al-milk al-nāqis). Criteria of land ownership in the Hadith oriented aspects of justice and benefits (maslaḥlah). Hadith Iḥya ‘al-Mawāt give you an idea that the Prophet prevent conflicts caused by land disputes by explaining the status and ownership of land with cultural framework. Efforts were made persuasively by a cultural approach, in addition to the structural approach.[Artikel ini membahas tentang kepemilikan tanah dari perspektif tradisi, terutama tradisi kebangkitan kembali bumi yang mati (Iḥya ‘al-Mawāt). Hal ini berkaitan dengan konflik tanah yang kerap terjadi, sehingga membutuhkan perspektif agama dalam kepemilikan tanah. Karena itu, masalah yang diangkat adalah bagaimana kepemilikan tanah dalam Hadis? Bagaimana Hadis memberikan solusi terhadap sengketa tanah? Untuk menjawabnya digunakan pendekatan historis, hermeneutik, dan sosiologi. Ternyata kepemilikan dalam Islam ada tiga, yaitu kepemilikan individu, kepemilikan bersama dan kepemilikan negara. Islam mengakui kepemilikan individu sempurna (al-milk al- tāmm) dan tidak sempurna (al-milk al-nāqis). Kriteria kepemilikan tanah dalam hadis berorientasi aspek keadilan dan tunjangan (maslaḥlah). Hadis Iḥya ‘al-Mawāt memberi Anda gagasan bahwa Nabi  mencegah  konflik yang  disebabkan  oleh  sengketa  tanah  dengan  menjelaskan  status  dan kepemilikan tanah dengan kerangka budaya. Upaya dilakukan secara persuasif dengan pendekatan budaya, disamping pendekatan struktural.]

scholarly journals Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah Kehutanan di Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Badung

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 291-295
Author(s):  
I Gede Edy Korneawan ◽  
A.A Sagung Laksmi Dewi ◽  
Luh Putu Suryani
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Spatial Layout ◽  
Regional Office ◽  
Applicable Law ◽  
Land Dispute ◽  
Land Disputes ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right

Land is one of the most important parts of the earth's surface, where land is a source of welfare for the community. In the UUPA, the concept of land rights is differentiated into two, namely, first, the right to control of the State as regulated in article 2 which is based on the elaboration of Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. This study aims to determine the process of resolving forestry land disputes at the Land Office of Badung Regency. The research method used is the normative method, namely examining the decision of the head of the BPN RI regional office with the applicable law. The results of the analysis show that based on the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 18 of 2003 concerning the prevention and eradication of forest destruction, it is concluded that the causes of the dispute are 6. Based on the Perkab BPN No. 3/2011 there are two land dispute resolution through litigation, namely dispute resolution through court channels, and non-litigation, namely dispute resolution through BPN mediation. Through research, it is hoped that the government can determine the spatial layout of the area so that a single map is created and there are no overlapping policies between the Ministry of Forestry and the Forestry Service

scholarly journals LAND DISPUTE SETTLEMENT POST LAW NO. 2 OF 2012; GLAGAH VILLAGE CASE STUDY RELATED TO NYIA AIRPORT

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 109-124
Author(s):  
King Faisal Sulaiman ◽  
Iwan Satriawan
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Local Community ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Land Acquisition ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Ruling Elite ◽  
New Model ◽  
Land Dispute ◽  
Land Disputes

The location for the New Yogyakarta International Airport (NYIA) construction involved in land disputes during the land acquisition process. The land acquisition will always lead to disputes or conflicts with the affected people. It is even more complicated if, in the development process, the ruling elite intervenes, external forces outside the local community that are not directly related to the development. This article deals with the question of the government's public perceptions of the legal polemic of land dispute settlement based on Law No.2 of 2012, and concentrates to examine a new model of land dispute resolution from the perspective of affected communities against NYIA. This research is normative-empirical based on primary and secondary data, namely a literature study, field study, using purposive sampling with interviews, FGD, observation, and qualitative descriptive analysis. The result showed the failure of formal litigation and non-litigation approaches offered by Law No.2 of 2012 to resolve the disputes fairly. Village discussions based on local wisdom as a new model for equitable land dispute resolution needs a political review of Law No. 2 of 2012. The new paradigm of agrarian reform must be based on customary law and local wisdom values in the 1945 Constitution and the Agrarian Law. Given recent controversies concerning land disputes, a law on reform and structuring the national agrarian structure, Agrarian conflict resolution law, and law of natural resources management for the community are urgently needed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document