scholarly journals Peluang Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata Tentang Tanah Melalui Alternative Dispute Resolution

2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 47
Author(s):  
Made Oka Cahyadi Wiguna
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Choice Of Law ◽  
Legal Principles ◽  
Land Dispute ◽  
Land Disputes ◽  
Civil Dispute

AbstractThe current developments, there are many land disputes that are vertical or horizontal. Issues concerning land affairs are often caused by salim claims over land rights. The intended land dispute is a civil dispute concerning the land. Achieving a win-win solution in the settlement of civil disputes over land is relatively difficult to materialize, if the settlement is resolved through a trial (litigation). The choice of law that can be chosen to obtain and realize a win-win solution in solving civil disputes over land is of course through alternative dispute resolution. By way of negotiation, mediation and conciliation. In the course of the settlement of civil disputes over land settled through alternative dispute resolution, the settlement can not ignore the applicable legal principles of the treaty.  Keywords: Land civil disputes, alternative dispute resolution and principles of contract.AbstrakPerkembangan yang terjadi saat ini, banyak terjadi sengketa pertanahan yang bersifat vertikal maupun horizontal. Permasalahan mengenai pertanahan yang terjadi sering disebabkan akibat salim klaim penguasaan hak atas tanah. Sengketa tanah yang dimaksudkan adalah sengketa perdata tentang tanah. Mewujudkan win-win solution dalam penyelesaian sengketa perdata tentang tanah relatif sulit dapat terwujud, apabila penyelesaiannya diselesaikan melalui sidang peradilan (litigation). Pilihan hukum (choice of law) yang dapat dipilih untuk memperoleh dan mewujudkan win-win solution dalam menyelesaikan sengketa perdata tentang tanah tentunya adalah melalui alternative dispute resolution. dengan cara negosiasi, mediasi dan konsiliasi. Dalam rangka penyelesaian sengketa perdata tentang tanah diselesaikan melalui alternative dispute resolution, maka penyelesaiannya tidak dapat mengabaikan asas-asas hukum yang berlaku mengenai perjanjian. Kata Kunci :   Sengketa perdata tanah, alternatif penyelesaian sengketa dan asas-asas    perjanjian.  

scholarly journals Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah Kehutanan di Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Badung

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 291-295
Author(s):  
I Gede Edy Korneawan ◽  
A.A Sagung Laksmi Dewi ◽  
Luh Putu Suryani
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Spatial Layout ◽  
Regional Office ◽  
Applicable Law ◽  
Land Dispute ◽  
Land Disputes ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right

Land is one of the most important parts of the earth's surface, where land is a source of welfare for the community. In the UUPA, the concept of land rights is differentiated into two, namely, first, the right to control of the State as regulated in article 2 which is based on the elaboration of Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. This study aims to determine the process of resolving forestry land disputes at the Land Office of Badung Regency. The research method used is the normative method, namely examining the decision of the head of the BPN RI regional office with the applicable law. The results of the analysis show that based on the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 18 of 2003 concerning the prevention and eradication of forest destruction, it is concluded that the causes of the dispute are 6. Based on the Perkab BPN No. 3/2011 there are two land dispute resolution through litigation, namely dispute resolution through court channels, and non-litigation, namely dispute resolution through BPN mediation. Through research, it is hoped that the government can determine the spatial layout of the area so that a single map is created and there are no overlapping policies between the Ministry of Forestry and the Forestry Service

scholarly journals Kedudukan Dinas Pertanahan Aceh Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Pertanahan Pasca Perpres Nomor 23 Tahun 2015

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 395-416
Author(s):  
Rahmat Nofrizal ◽  
Husni Jalil ◽  
Muhammad Saleh
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Significant Role ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Public Access ◽  
Land Conflicts ◽  
State Institutions ◽  
Land Dispute ◽  
Legal Standard ◽  
Land Disputes ◽  
Regional Land

Pada tahun 2016, Pemerintah Aceh membentuk Dinas Pertanahan Aceh yang kewenangannya mengurusi di bidang pelayanan pertanahan. Salah satu kewenangannya adalah dalam hal penyelesaian sengketa pertanahan. Pada Kenyataannya, Badan Pertanahan Nasional (BPN) juga memiliki kewenangan dalam penyelesaian sengketa pertanahan di Aceh. Terdapat tumpang tindih kewenangan dua lembaga negara dalam hal penyelesaian sengketa pertanahan di Aceh. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui kedudukan Dinas Pertanahan Aceh dalam penyelesaian sengketa pertanahan pasca Perpres Nomor 23 Tahun 2015. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif. Hasil penilitian menunjukkan bahwa kedudukan Dinas Pertanahan Aceh memiliki peranan penting dalam penyelesaian sengketa pertanahan yang terjadi di Aceh. Lahirnya Dinas Pertanahan Aceh dapat mempermudah akses masyarakat dalam hal penyelesaian konflik tanah. Disarankan DPR Aceh bersama Gubernur Aceh perlu mempercepat proses pengesahan draf Qanun Pertanahan Aceh sebagai payung hukum bagi Dinas Pertanahan Aceh dalam mengoptimalkan peran dan fungsinya terkait penyelesaian sengketa pertanahan di Aceh.In 2016, the Aceh Government formed the Regional Land Office of Aceh whose authority held government affairs in land services. One of the authorities of the Regional Land Office of Aceh is in terms of land dispute resolution and conflict. The National Land Agency (BPN) also has authority in resolving land disputes in Aceh. There are overlaps in the authority of two state institutions regarding resolving land disputes in Aceh. This study aims to determine the position of the Regional Land Office of Aceh in settlement of land disputes after the issuance of the Presidential Regulation Number 23 of 2015. This study uses a normative juridical research method. The research results show that the position of the Regional Land Office of Aceh has a significant role in resolving land disputes that occurred in Aceh. The establishment of The Regional Land Office of Aceh can facilitate public access in terms of resolving land conflicts. It is suggested that the Aceh House Representative together with the Governor of Aceh need to accelerate the process of ratifying the draft of Qanun (Islamic bylaw) of Aceh Land as a strong legal standard for the Regional Land Office of Aceh in optimizing its roles and functions related to land dispute resolution in Aceh.

scholarly journals The Role of Alternative Dispute Resolution in Trans-Boundary Land Dispute: The Case of Ikot Idaha and Osuk Ediene Communities in Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 68-78
Author(s):  
R.E Ukpong-Umo ◽  
I.U Udobia ◽  
A.O Agwu
Keyword(s):  
Conflict Resolution ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Monitoring And Evaluation ◽  
Mediation Process ◽  
Interview Method ◽  
Land Dispute ◽  
The People ◽  
Content Analysis Method ◽  
Border Conflicts

The perennial land dispute of Ibime Water Trench, a trans-boundary land area between Ikot Idaha and Osuk Ediene Communities in Ikono Local Government Area of Akwa Ibom State has led to discord, hatred and dissonance over several years in the past. Despite repeated efforts by both parties to identify and resolve the underlying issues and contain the problem, it was found to have recurred after a period of seeming calm. This paper therefore aims at investigating and identifying the underlying factors that trigger recurrent trans-border conflicts between Ikot Idaha and Osuk Ediene Communities and the application of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), using the Mediation Technique in conflict resolution. Data were elicited through the indept interview method and analysed using the content analysis method. Result shows that through the Mediation process, both disputing parties were able to resolve their differences and have been living and sharing in the Ibime water resources together and peacefully for over thirty years. In line with the theory of Conflict Resolution, the development of Impact Sensitive Outcome Mapping as a form of monitoring and evaluation was adopted to serve as an intervention to proffer a lasting solution for a peaceful coexistence among the people of both communities.

scholarly journals Executorial Strength of Deed of Peace in Civil Dispute Resolution in Indonesia

2021 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 5179-5184
Author(s):  
Endang Hadrian
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Comparative Law ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Legal Principles ◽  
Legal Rules ◽  
Legal Remedies ◽  
Peace Settlement ◽  
Civil Dispute

Civil dispute resolution can be settled through peace institutions with the legal product in form of a deed of peace. However, this institution has not been used by many people even though it provides the civil dispute settlement the executorial strength faster. Thus, it offers no further legal remedies be it in the form of appeals and cassation. Practically, a deed of peace is known to have executorial strength. However, some parties pursue the legal effort despite the peace settlement in the form of the deed of peace. The optimization of the use of the peace institution with executorial strength is expected to solve the problems. This study employed normative legal research with the perspective of legal/ judicial focused on rules/norms of Civil Procedure Law and comparative law through legal principles. It is the study of legal rules which are the benchmarks to behave appropriately. This study was carried out on the norms and principles in the secondary data, which were found in the primary, secondary, and tertiary legal sources.  

scholarly journals PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA TANAH ULAYAT YANG TELAH BERSERTIFIKAT BERDASARKAN HUKUM ADAT MALIND-ANIM

Arena Hukum ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 150-166
Author(s):  
Ahmad Muddin ◽  
◽  
Hardianto Djanggih
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Land Dispute ◽  
Traditional Institutions ◽  
Customary Land

Abstract This study aims to analyze dispute resolution, the dispute resolution approach that guarantees legal certainty and examine the factors that influence the construction of the settlement of land rights of the customary community of Malind-Amin. This normative and empirical legal research is analized descriptively and analytically. The results shows that the nature of customary land dispute with customary law can be resolved through positive legal mechanisms and customary law mechanisms, while dispute resolution on disputed objects that have certificates based on the release of traditional institutions through mediation, synchronization / harmonization of laws and the making of local regulations. However, efforts to resolve this have experienced various factors of internal and external obstacles.

scholarly journals PEMBENTUKAN PENGADILAN PERTANAHAN SEBAGAI SOLUSI PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PERTANAHAN

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 264
Author(s):  
Budi Sastra Panjaitan
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Natural Resources ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Research Approach ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Land Dispute ◽  
Land Disputes ◽  
Main Factor

ABSTRAKSengketa pertanahan tetap akan ada ketika para pihak telah memposisikan tanah sebagai faktor produksi yang utama ditambah kemudian tumpang tindihnya peraturan yang berhubungan dengan pertanahan dan sumber daya alam. Sengketa pertanahan dapat melahirkan anarkisme yang tidak jarang menimbulkan berbagai bentuk pelanggaran hak-hak asasi manusia. Pendekatan penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif, dengan kesimpulan sebagai berikut: Badan peradilan yang ada telah dipandang tidak lagi sederhana, cepat dan biaya ringan. Pengadilan pertanahan merupakan solusi guna mengatasi kebuntuan dalam penyelesaian sengketa pertanahan, pengadilan pertanahan tidak hanya sekedar formalistik-legalistik dalam mewujudkan keadilan. Keberadaan pengadilan pertanahan dibutuhkan dalam rangka terwujudnya penyelesaian sengketa pertanahan secara cepat, sistematis, sederhana, berkeadilan dan biaya ringan.Kata kunci: sengketa; pertanahan; perngadilan pertanahan.ABSTRACTLand disputes will still arise when the parties have positioned land as the main factor of production plus overlapping regulations relating to land and natural resources. Land disputes can give rise to anarchism which often results in various forms of violations of human rights. The research approach used is normative legal research, with the following conclusions: Existing judicial bodies are no longer considered simple, fast and low cost. Land court is a solution to overcome impasse in the resolution of land disputes, land court is not just formalistic-legalistic in realizing justice. The existence of a land court is needed in order to realize a land dispute resolution that is fast, systematic, simple, fair and low cost.Keywords: dispute; land; land court.

13. Statutory Tribunals

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Thompson ◽  
Michael Gordon
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Legal Principles ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Staged Approach ◽  
Administrative Justice

Extracts have been chosen from a wide range of historical and contemporary cases to illustrate the reasoning processes of the courts and to show how legal principles are developed. This chapter examines the rationale for giving the task of resolving disputes to statutory tribunals rather than courts. It also describes the new structure and organization for most tribunals and how they conduct dispute resolution adjudication. This technique of redress is considered alongside some methods of alternative dispute resolution. Their place in a staged approach, proportionate dispute resolution, is outlined and the possible benefit of conceiving administrative justice as a system with a focus on users is raised.

scholarly journals PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PENGADAAN TANAH GUNA PEMBANGUNAN BANDAR UDARA INTERNASIONAL BERBASIS NILAI KEADILAN SOSIAL

NOTARIUS ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 83
Author(s):  
Mia Permata Sari ◽  
Suteki Suteki
Keyword(s):  
Social Justice ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Public Interest ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Land Acquisition ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
The Public ◽  
Land Dispute

In resolving land acquisition disputes for the public interest, it is fitting for the state to pay attention to values outside of the rule of law itself, including the value of social justice and the value of benefits to guarantee the basic rights of affected communities. This study aims to find out what factors cause the settlement of land acquisition disputes in terms of juridical aspects not reflecting the value of justice and benefit for the parties and formulating land acquisition dispute resolution models in a legal socio perspective that can realize the value of social justice and benefits for party. an appropriate method is needed that can accommodate the value of social justice and the benefits in resolving the dispute, among others, promoting the Consensus Meeting and the Need for Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) as an alternative solution. In addition, the need to calculate non-physical losses in the assessment of compensation for people who have lost their livelihoods due to land acquisition projects Keywords: Land Acquisition, Land Dispute Settlement, Public Interest AbstrakDalam penyelesaian sengketa pengadaan tanah untuk kepentingan umum sudah sepatutnya negara memperhatikan nilai-nilai diluar daripada aturan hukum itu sendiri, diantaranya nilai keadilan sosial dan nilai kemanfaatan untuk menjamin hak-hak dasar masyarakat terdampak. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk  untuk mengetahui faktor apa saja yang menyebabkan penyelesaian sengketa pengadaan tanah tersebut ditinjau dari aspek yuridis belum mencerminkan nilai keadilan dan kemanfaatan bagi para pihak sertaa merumuskan model penyelesaian sengketa pengadaan tanah dalam perspektif socio legal yang dapat mewujudkan nilai keadilan sosial dan kemanfaatan bagi para pihak. dibutuhkan suatu metode yang tepat yang dapat mengakomodasi nilai keadilan sosial dan kemanfaatan dalam penyelesaian sengketa tersebut diantaranya mengedepankan Musyawarah Mufakat dan Perlunya Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) sebagai solusi alternatif.. Selain itu, perlunya memperhitungkan kerugian non fisik dalam penilaian ganti rugi sehingga, terdapat solusi bagi masyarakat yang kehilangan mata pencaharianya akibat proyek pengadaan tanah Kata Kunci : Pengadaan Tanah, Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah , Kepentingan Umum 

scholarly journals Implementasi PTSL Sebagai Upaya Pencegahan Konflik Pertanahan Di Kecamatan Ingin Jaya Kabupaten Aceh Besar

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 217
Author(s):  
M. Syuib ◽  
Sarah Diana Aulia
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Large Area ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Land Dispute ◽  
Land Disputes ◽  
Legal Uncertainty ◽  
The Government ◽  
Ownership Of Land

In order to guarantee legal certainty for land rights holders, the Government is conducting land registration program throughout Indonesia territory. The program has put an obligation to the land rights holder to register their land. The purpose of land registration is, to provide evidence for the ownership of land. The implementation mechanism of the program in regulated in the Permen ATR/BPN Number 6 of 2018 concerning Complete Systematic Land Registration (PTSL). The presence of the Permen is, in order to prevent land disputes in the community by accelerating land registration. Sub-district of Ingin Jaya, which is located in the Aceh Besar district, is one of the areas where PTSL activities are carried out. Currently, there is a large area of land in the Aceh Besar district has not been certified yet, it may cause legal uncertainty for land owner and such condition can potentially lead to land dispute. One of the indicators to claim this, are by taking land dispute cases as put on trial in the Jantho Court which has reached 32 cases from 2014 until 2019. This study aims to find out how the implementation of PTSL and its barrier in the Sub-District of Ingin Jaya, Aceh Besar. The research method is an empirical juridical research; it works by conducting observations, interviews, and documentation. The result found that the implementation of PTSL in the Sub-District of Ingin Jaya, Aceh Besar, is in accordance with Permen ATR/BPN No. 6 of 2018. However, in the ground, it is found that there are a number of obstacles which affect the successful of the PTSL program both internally and externally. Therefore, synergy and cooperation with all parties are needed so that the PTSL program in the Sub-District of Ingin Jaya can be implemented successfully in order to provide legal certainty for land rights holders, so that the land dispute can be prevented as early as possible.

scholarly journals Penerapan Аsаs-Аsаs Umum Pemerintаhаn yаng Bаik dаlаm Penyelesаiаn Sengketа Tanah Hak Milik

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 35
Author(s):  
Dita Ernanda ◽  
Istislam Istislam ◽  
Yuliati Yuliati
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Land Dispute ◽  
Field Assessment ◽  
Data Collection And Analysis ◽  
Land Disputes ◽  
Good Government ◽  
Application Data ◽  
The Republic ◽  
And Control

This study aimed to describe the procedure for resolving land disputes, the application of the General Principles of Good Government (AUPB) in land dispute resolution, and the supporting and inhibiting factors for the application of AUPB in resolving land disputes. This study used a sociological juridical approach, with the type of empirical juridical research. The procedure for resolving land disputes was through two types of applications, namely letters of public complaints and implementation of court decisions. The application of AUPB in land dispute resolution started from the application, data collection and analysis, field assessment and inspection, case exposure, case settlement reports, settlement, and implementation of settlement decisions. Supporting factors for the implementation of AUPB were the Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/Head of the National Land Agency of the Republic of Indonesia Number 11 of 2016, Section for Handling Land Problems and Control, as well as facilities and infrastructure for mediation, case titles, and transportation. The obstacle of the AUPB implementation included the inkracht decision to issue replacement certificates that had not been explicitly regulated, resulting in land registration services being blocked by the system and uncooperative parties.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document