scholarly journals FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI PELAKSANAAN ACARA PEMERIKSAAN CEPAT DI PENGADILAN NEGERI BANGLI

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 37
Author(s):  
Desyanti Suka Asih K.Tus ◽  
I Gede Putu Mantra ◽  
Ni Wayan Ardani
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Social Status ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Cultural Factors ◽  
District Court ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Legal Rules ◽  
Community Facilities ◽  
Examination Process

<p>The court is obliged to uphold justice regardless of one’s social status. Resolving criminal cases is carried out through the courts with various types of examination processes. The examination process is referred to as a normal examination, a short examination, a quick examination in accordance with the Criminal Code. Therefore, it is necessary to know whether the implementation of the rapid inspection program has been carried out in accordance with the<br />applicable rules both in the Criminal Code and other legal rules. The implementation of the quick inspection program at the Bangli District Court can be carried out effectively and efficiently so that the achievement of legal objectives, namely justice and legal certainty for the entire community. It is inseparable from the factors that influence its implementation. So that in this<br />study the author discussed what are the factors that influence the implementation of the rapid inspection program in Bangli District Court and whether there are any factors that become obstacles in the implementation of the rapid examination program at Bangli District Court. The results of the study are as follows: Factors that influence the implementation of the rapid inspection<br />program at Bangli District Court namely; law enforcement, community, facilities and facilities as well as cultural factors.</p>

Analisis Yuridis Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang (Studi Putusan No. 311/Pid.Sus/2018/Pn. Mdn)

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 974-981
Author(s):  
Andika Pratama ◽  
Rizkan Zulyadi ◽  
Sri Pinem
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Money Laundering ◽  
Research Method ◽  
District Court ◽  
Legal Rules ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
Proceeds Of Crime ◽  
Public Scrutiny ◽  
Examination Process ◽  
Descriptive Method

The panel of judges adjudicating the money laundering case found the defendant guilty of the crime of money laundering from the narcotics crime, and therefore sentenced the defendant to 7 (seven) years imprisonment. Based on this, the formulation of the problems in this study: 1) How are the legal rules regarding money laundering in Indonesia, 2) How is law enforcement against the crime of money laundering in the Medan District Court, 3) What is the basis for the judge's consideration in imposing crimes against money laundering offenders in the Decision Number 311 / Pid.sus / 2018 / PN. Mdn. The research method used is descriptive method, while the data analysis technique used is descriptive qualitative. The results showed that the crime of money laundering is regulated in Law no. 8 of 2010 concerning the Prevention and Eradication of the Crime of Money Laundering (UU PP - TPPU). The threat of money laundering is regulated in Article 3, namely imprisonment for a maximum of 20 (twenty) years and a maximum fine of Rp. 10,000,000,000. The panel of judges at the District Court that adjudicates money laundering crimes acts decisively in imposing crimes, especially because the examination process usually receives public scrutiny, such as money laundering from narcotics and corruption crimes. The basis for the consideration that the panel of judges, the defendant has participated in the circulation of narcotics by receiving, transferring money as payment for narcotics, this is commonly done by the perpetrators of the Crime of Money Laundering to disguise or hide the origin of the proceeds of crime. However, the panel of judges had imposed a sentence that was too low on the defendant, namely 7 years in prison, far below the threat of money laundering in Article 3 of the TPPU Law where the defendant was found guilty, namely 20 years in prison.

IMPLEMENTATION OF LEGAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL CASES IN CIBINONG DISTRICT COURT

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-92
Author(s):  
Sutan Surya Radonna ◽  
Dadang Suprijatna ◽  
J. Jopie Gilalo
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Field Research ◽  
Cultural Factors ◽  
District Court ◽  
Legal Assistance ◽  
Legal Aid ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Social And Cultural Factors

Legal aid is a legal sevice program provided to alleviate the burden of life for  people who cannot afford financially, and is also useful to create justice and legal protection to society. This legal research is an empirical legal research or descriptive field research. The research is located at Cibinong District Court. Data collection techniques were conducted through interviews with Cibinong District Court judges and literature studies in the form of books, legislation, journals, etc. to support comprehension and completeness of data or materials. Problems in this Research are about implementation of the granting of legal aid to defendants who cannot afford financially in criminal cases and restricted factors towards implementation of granting legal aid to defendants who cannot afford financially in criminal cases. Based on the research results, and the discussion about the analysis of the implementation of legal aid to defendants who cannot afford financially in criminal cases, the implementation of the granting of legal aid can be done through courts, and Legal Aid Institutes (LBH) and  directly in accordance with initiative of advocates who voluntarily willing to accompany the defendants. Factors restricting implementation of granting legal aid to defendants who cannot afford financially in criminal cases such as: factors in law enforcement, social and cultural factors, facilities and infrastructure as well. As recommendation, it high required to to courts and LBH to socialize procedures of free legal assistance to the defendants and what sanctions to parties who inhibit the implementation of the granting of legal aid to the defendants in criminal cases.

scholarly journals Penegakan Hukum terhadap Tindak Pidana Perjudian Toto Gelap

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 1199-1208
Author(s):  
Natanail Sitepu ◽  
Isnaini Isnaini ◽  
Muhammad Citra Ramadhan
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
District Court ◽  
Weak Supervision ◽  
Legal Rules ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
Qualitative Descriptive ◽  
Lottery Gambling ◽  
Descriptive Method

This study aims to analyze the legal rules regarding the crime of gambling to analyze what factors encourage the occurrence of illegal toto gambling crimes, especially in Deli Serdang Regency. The research method used is descriptive method, with a case approach and legislation, with interview data collection instruments and documentation studies, while the data analysis technique uses qualitative descriptive. The results of the study show that the legal regulation of lottery gambling is based on article 303 of the Criminal Code and article 303 bis and the UTE Law article 27 paragraph (2), with criminal threats in article 45 paragraph (2), as well as Law no. 7 of 1974 concerning Gambling Control in Article 1 that gambling in any form is a crime. The factors that encourage the occurrence of gambling crimes in Deli Serdang Regency are: the hope of getting a win, the influence of the environment, lottery gambling is easy for everyone to do, it doesn't take much time to do it, lottery clerks are available in many places, the development of information technology make it easier for players to send guesses for lottery gambling numbers, as well as weak supervision by the police. Law enforcement against lottery type gambling at the Lubuk Pakam District Court is still not firm.

scholarly journals Akibat Hukum Berlakunya Perma Nomor 02 Tahun 2012 Tentang Penyesuaian Batasan Tindak Pidana Pencurian Ringan Dan Jumlah Denda Dalam KUHP

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 998-1007
Author(s):  
Hasiholan Naibaho ◽  
Isnaini Isnaini ◽  
Marlina Marlina
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Police Officers ◽  
Criminal Policy ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Community Culture ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Legal Rules ◽  
The Law

By issuing Supreme Court Regulation Number 2 of 2012 concerning Limits of Minor Crimes and the Amount of Fines in the Criminal Code in order to resolve minor crimes. After the issuance of the PERMA, a new problem arose because the PERMA was not used in the settlement of minor criminal cases. This causes legal uncertainty after the issuance of PERMA No. 2 of 2012. This thesis uses normative legal research, namely research that refers to legal norms contained in laws and regulations that apply as a normative footing. The legal rules limiting minor crimes and the amount of fines in the Criminal Code with the issuance of Supreme Court Regulation Number 02 of 2012 namely: Legal Position Supreme Court Regulation Number 2 of 2012 substantially relates to adjustments to the limits of minor crimes and the amount of fines. The implementation of the law against the crime of minor theft after the issuance of the Supreme Court Regulation Number 02 of 2012 concerning minor crimes is as follows: The existence of Perma No. 2 of 2012 is a Criminal Policy and so far criminal policy is understood as the domain of the Criminal Justice System (SPP) which implements the representation of the state. In addition, criminal policy is also better understood as a way to enforce the law in the context of crime prevention. Constraints faced by law enforcement officers of the Police. Constraints in law enforcement occur when there is a discrepancy between value pairs and this discrepancy can be caused by: understanding of the police regarding the regulation, the courage of the police officers without overlapping, socialization of the regulation and shaping community culture

scholarly journals Konsepsi Hukum Progresif dalam Pengaturan Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 35-39
Author(s):  
Efraim Mbomba Reda ◽  
I Nyoman Putu Budiartha ◽  
I Made Minggu Widyantara
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Role Models ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Legal Positivism ◽  
Sociology Of Law ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Descriptive Method

Progressive law puts forward the sociology of law rather than legal certainty which is the focus of legal positivism. In Indonesia, this law was coined by Satjipto Rahardjo. This study aims to determine the formulation of progressive law in future criminal law, and to determine the actualization of the concept of progressive law in regulating corruption in Indonesia. The research method used is a normative legal research method with statute and conceptual approaches. The technique of collecting legal materials in this study is a descriptive method that aims to obtain the meaning of reality related to the problems to be discussed and solved in this study. The results show that in the current Criminal Code Bill, progressive law has been regulated, to be precise in Article 2 paragraph (1) and (2). Progressive law is also regulated in Law no. 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power. Then, the actualization of progressive law in regulating corruption in Indonesia is a judge with the powers that take into account the sociological context of society in making decisions. Judges, prosecutors and lawyers can certainly discuss together in eradicating corruption. Efforts are also being made to reconstruct and redefine the power of law enforcement. This arrangement can also encourage the KPK to be more progressive in eradicating corruption, as well as building law enforcers who have morality so that they can become role models and increase public participation, for example by forming NGOs in preventing or fighting corruption in various agencies.

scholarly journals JUDGE'S JUDGMENT ON CRIMINAL OFFENSE AGAINST PERPETRATORS OF CRIMINAL EXTORTION WITH THE VIOLENCE AGAINST OTHER PEOPLE'S MOTORCYCLES (Verdict Study Number: 237/Pid. B/2018/PN Kla)

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (01) ◽  
pp. 56-65
Author(s):  
Oktasari Putri Pramisela ◽  
Yulia Hesti
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Attorney General ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Deterrent Effect ◽  
District Court ◽  
Criminal Offence ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
Violent Criminal ◽  
The Law

A crime or criminal act, usually perpetrators of criminals because of an encouragement based on the importance of fulfilling the necessities of life that is relatively difficult to fulfill. In principle the crime problem does not stand alone, but it relates to other issues such as social, economic, political and cultural which is as a phenomenon that affects each other. To tackle crimes and criminal acts such a thorough enforcement and anticipation policy is required. One of the most common criminal acts in the community is the violence of violent blackmail. Perpetrators can be assessed by the community, therefore it is necessary to be handled by the law enforcement officers intensively with the severity of the criminal that was dropped. The problem in this study is how the judge's consideration in dropping a criminal against perpetrators of criminal offenses with violence against motorcycles belonging to others, what are some factors causing perpetrators of criminal extortion with violence. The method of study used is the normative juridical approach and empirical approach obtained directly at the District Court of Kls II Kalianda, state Attorney of South Lampung. Based on the results of the study can be concluded that the judge's judgment in the criminal offence against the perpetrator of violent criminal offence is in accordance with the element contained in article 368 paragraph (1) of the criminal CODE and was sentenced to 2 years imprisonment. Factors affecting the cause of perpetrators of criminal extortion in violence are environmental factors, economic factors on society, the law enforcement. The advice given is to be expected to the Tribunal, the attorney general and the police in providing or establishing the article can be in accordance with its elements and actions, to the rationing punishment against the defendant is considered fair and give a deterrent effect so that the defendant can not repeat it again. There is cooperation between law enforcement and the community in minimizing the crimes that occurred.

scholarly journals TINJAUAN YURIDIS TENTANG GABUNGAN TINDAK PIDANA SEBAGAI HAL YANG MEMBERATKAN PIDANA Studi Kasus: Putusan Perkara Nomor:141/Pid.B/2018/PN Mrj (Pencurian)

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 212-226
Author(s):  
Failin Failin
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Deterrent Effect ◽  
District Court ◽  
Prison Sentence ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
The Family ◽  
Sense Of Justice

In criminal law there is no penalty if there is no wrongdoing, this basis is about the accountability of a person for the actions he has done. Therefore, in criminal law there are exceptions to such criminal liability, for example contained in Articles 48, 49, 50 and so forth. In addition, there are burdensome things that will be imposed on the accused for crimes committed, such as samenloop, recidive and so on. In the Muaro Sijunjung District Court there is one case concerning a combination of criminal acts, namely theft crimes accompanied by violence and moreover this theft is carried out among families (theft in the family). In this case the judge has decided the prison sentence for 6 (six) Years. But according to the analysis of the author there is no sense of justice for the victim because this perpetrator is the husband of the victim's child so that there is no deterrent effect for the perpetrator, the reason that there is no more theft in this family because no matter how small the crime committed by a person must be taken action in order to obtain justice and legal certainty. In principle, judges have the freedom to determine the measure of punishment to be imposed on the perpetrators of crimes, as long as it does not exceed the maximum provisions specified in the Criminal Code. Therefore, the sentencing of the accused for a combination of crimes committed by means of pure absorption Stelsel that is If a person commits several acts that are several delik each threatened with a different kind of criminal

scholarly journals Rasisme dan Penerapan Pasal Makar terhadap Kebebasan Ekspresi Politik Papua

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-80
Author(s):  
Herlambang P. Wiratraman
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
District Court ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Human Rights Law ◽  
Freedom Of Association ◽  
Political Expression ◽  
Ratio Decidendi ◽  
The Republic

Freedom of political expression has not been fully guaranteed in the Indonesian legal system. One of the most prominent in the legal debate is the matter of treason (makar) charges against political expressions of self-determination. In the case of Papua, many Papuans have been detained, criminalised, and even killed because of their political expression. Interestingly, the Constitutional Court, through its decision Number 7/PUU-XV/2017, provided guidance in its ‘ratio decidendi’ argument, specifically the interpretation of treason phrases in the Criminal Code. Interpretation is given by the Constitutional Court after seeing the reality that law enforcement has been arbitrarily abused by the application of the treason article. This is contrary to the freedom of association, opinion and expression, as guaranteed in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. This article discusses how the application of the phrase treason in law enforcement, especially in connection with the conviction of many Papuans after the Surabaya anti-racism rallies in September 2019. A number of district court decisions on dozens of convicted Papuans show that the legal system that guarantees freedom of political expression has not changed much and law enforcement in fact emphasises the position of racial discrimination and is far below the standard of human rights law. Abstrak Kebebasan ekspresi politik belum sepenuhnya dijamin dalam sistem hukum Indonesia. Salah satu yang paling mengemuka dalam perdebatan hukum adalah soal tuduhan makar terhadap ekspresi politik menentukan nasib sendiri. Dalam kasus Papua, tidak sedikit jumlah warga Papua yang ditahan, dikriminalkan, hingga tewas terbunuh karena soal ekspresi politiknya. Menariknya, Mahkamah Konstitusi melalui putusannya Nomor 7/PUU-XV/2017 memberikan panduan dalam argumen ratio decidendinya, khusus interpretasi frasa makar dalam Kitab-Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. Penafsiran diberikan oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi setelah melihat realitas penegakan hukum telah banyak disalahgunakan penerapan pasal makar. Hal demikian bertentangan dengan kebebasan berkumpul, berpendapat dan berekspresi, sebagaimana dijamin dalam Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Artikel ini membahas bagaimana penerapan frasa makar dalam penegakan hukumnya, khususnya berkaitan dengan dipidananya banyak warga Papua setelah aksi anti rasisme Surabaya pada September 2019. Sejumlah putusan pengadilan negeri atas puluhan warga Papua yang dipidana tersebut memperlihatkan sistem hukum yang menjamin kebebasan ekspresi politik tidak banyak berubah dan penegakan hukum justru menegaskan posisi diskriminasi rasial serta jauh dari standar hukum hak asasi manusia.

scholarly journals ALTERNATIF MEDIASI PENAL DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA DI INDONESIA

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 127
Author(s):  
Reyner . ◽  
Dian Andriawan Daeng Tawang
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Wide Society ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
Special Rule ◽  
Investigation Process ◽  
Regulations And Guidelines

In general, penal mediation can be said as a concept that brings together the victims and criminals to discuss their interests and willingness in order to resolve criminal cases that have occurred between them, and are assisted by a mediator who is neutral and help to resolve criminal cases by giving advice and mediating as mediators. The results of the research conducted by normative research and through several literature such as legal books, regulations, and guidelines, show that in fact, reason mediation has been carried out in the community and carried out by several law enforcement officials in the framework of the settlement process criminal. What is done in the midst of Indonesian society is only a peace process that shows customary law as its branch and many are applied within the police in the investigation process to carry out procedures for resolving criminal acts. The importance and need for penal mediation to be applied in formal law that is developing and prevailing in society can be a special rule that is regulated and is part of criminal procedural law for the sake of legal certainty. Penal mediation can be applied at the level of investigation by the police in the process of resolving criminal cases and creating equal welfare and justice in the wide society for sure

scholarly journals ANALISIS YURIDIS PENERAPAN KONSEP LEX SPESIALIS SISTEMATIS PADA PENEGAKAN HUKUM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DI BIDANG PERTAMBANGAN DIKAITKAN DENGAN AJARAN PERBARENGAN (CONCURSUS IDEALIS) DALAM HUKUM PIDANA

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tjahyo Kusumo
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Mining Sector ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Legal Implications ◽  
Penal Law ◽  
The One

ABSTRAKPerkembangan dan pembaharuan hukum pidana sudah meningkat dengan adanya penerapan penggabungan hukum dalam penyelesaian kasus tindak pidana. Perumusan masalah:Bagaimana penerapan konsep lex spesialis sistematis pada penegakan hukum tindak pidana korupsi di bidang Pertambangan Dikaitkan Dengan Ajaran Perbarengan Dalam Hukum Pidana? Bagaimana kepastian hukum penerapan konsep lex spesialis sistematis pada penegakan hukum tindak pidana korupsi di bidang Pertambangan dari sudut pandang keadilan ? Bagaimana implikasi hukum penerapan konsep lex spesialis sistematis pada penegakan hukum tindak pidana korupsi di bidang Pertambangan dalam pembaharuan hukum pidana?Tujuan Penelitian Untuk menjelaskan penerapan konsep lex spesialis systematis pada penegakan hukum tindak pidana korupsi di bidang Pertambangan Dikaitkan Dengan Ajaran Perbarengan Dalam Hukum Pidana Untuk menjelaskan kepastian hukum penerapan konsep lex spesialis systematis pada penegakan hukum tindak pidana korupsi di bidang Pertambangan dari sudut pandang keadilan.Untuk menjelaskan implikasi hukum penerapan konsep lex spesialis systematis pada penegakan hukum tindak pidana korupsi di bidang Pertambangan dalam pembaharuan hukum pidana Jenis penelitian hukumnya adalah secara normatif . Kesimpulan Penerapan konsep lex spesialis sistematis pada penegakan hukum tindak pidana korupsi di bidang Pertambangan Dikaitkan Dengan Ajaran Perbarengan Dalam Hukum Pidana terdapat dalam beberapa dakwaan yang terhadap terdakwa yang diperiksa pada persidangan. Hal ini dapat dilihat pada contoh kasus putusan Nomor: 16/Pid.Sus-PK/2018/PT.DKI dengan kronologinya: Terdakwa Nur Alam selaku Gubernur Sulawesi Tenggara didakwa sebagai yang melakukan, menyuruh melakukan perbuatan yang secara melawan hukum melakukan perbuatan memperkaya diri sendiri atau orangt lain atau suatu korporasi yang merugikan keuangan Negara atau perekonomian Negara. Kepastian hukum penerapan konsep lex spesialis systematis pada penegakan hukum tindak pidana korupsi di bidang Pertambangan dari sudut pandang keadilan yaitu bahwa Kebijakan hukum pidana melalui implementasi asas kekhususan sistematis (systematische specialiteit) merupakan upaya penting dalam harmonisasi dan sinkronisasi antar undang-undang yang terkandung sanksi pidana didalamnya, baik itu yang bersifat pure criminal act ataupun hukum pidana administrasi (administrative penal law). Asas kekhususan sistematis terdapat pada pasal 14 UU Tipikor. Interpretasi terhadap pasal ini tidak seragam sehingga seringkali mengakibatkan terjadinya kriminalisasi kebijakan pejabat. Sehingga masih belum mencapai keadilan. Implikasi hukum penerapan konsep lex spesialis sistematis pada penegakan hukum tindak pidana korupsi di bidang Pertambangan dalam pembaharuan hukum pidana bahwa penegak hukum, JPU dan hakim,baik di tingkat pertama, banding, maupun kasasi, dalam menyikapi perkara pidana yang mempertemukan dua ketentuan hukum pidana khusus secara sistematis.ABSTRACTThe development and renewal of criminal law has increased with the application of the incorporation of law in the resolution of criminal cases. Formulation of the problem: How is the application of the concept of a systematic lex specialist on law enforcement of criminal acts of corruption in the field of Mining Associated with the Doctrine of Reform in Criminal Law? What is the legal certainty of the application of the concept of a systematic lex specialist on law enforcement for criminal acts of corruption in the Mining field from the point of view of justice? What are the legal implications of applying the concept of a systematic lex specialist to law enforcement for corruption in the field of Mining in the renewal of criminal law?Research Objectives To explain the application of the concept of systematic lex specialists in law enforcement for corruption in the Mining field Attributed to the Doctrine of Reform in Criminal Law To explain the legal certainty of the application of the concept of systemic specialist lex in law enforcement for corruption in the mining field from the perspective of justice. legal implications of the application of the concept of systematic specialist lex in law enforcement for criminal acts of corruption in the field of Mining in the renewal of criminal law The type of legal research is normative.Conclusion The application of the concept of systematic lex specialists to law enforcement of criminal acts of corruption in the field of Mining Associated with the Doctrine of Collaboration in Criminal Law is contained in a number of charges against the defendants examined at trial. This can be seen in the example of case ruling Number: 16 / Pid.Sus-PK / 2018 / PT.DKI with its chronology: Defendant Nur Alam as the Governor of Southeast Sulawesi was charged as the one who committed, ordered to do an act that unlawfully commits an act of enriching oneself or any other person or corporation that is detrimental to the State's finances or the State's economy. Legal certainty The application of the concept of systematic specialist lex to law enforcement of corruption in the mining sector from the perspective of justice is that the criminal law policy through the implementation of the principle of systematic specificity (systematische specialiteit) is an important effort in the harmonization and synchronization between the laws contained in criminal sanctions therein , both those that are pure criminal act or administrative criminal law. The principle of systematic specificity is found in article 14 of the Corruption Law. The interpretation of this article is not uniform so it often results in the criminalization of official policies. So it still hasn't reached justice. Legal implications of the application of the concept of a systematic lex specialist on law enforcement for criminal acts of corruption in the Mining sector in the renewal of criminal law that law enforcement, prosecutors and judges, both at the first level, appeals, and cassation, in addressing criminal cases that bring together two specific criminal law provisions systematic.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document