Modernization Processes Development in the Implementation of Intellectual Capital in a Crisis

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Galyna Kucheruk ◽  
Olha Vovk ◽  
Nataliia Kovalenko ◽  
Valentina Romakh ◽  
Valentina Shevchenko

The article constructs the economic system modernization process, which reflects the qualitative influence of the intellectual capital features on the sequence of modernization transformation of the economic system: "resource supply" - "intellectualization" - "capitalization" - "modernization potential" - "modernization"; the system of infrastructure sphere modernization efficiency dynamic indicators at the enterprises is constructed and the analysis of its coherence is carried out; the modernization activity integrated indicators and intellectualization of the transport enterprises modernization process in the infrastructure sphere are substantiated and the assessment with their application is carried out.

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (49) ◽  
pp. 117-123
Author(s):  
O. A. Dovgal ◽  
◽  
G. V. Dovhal ◽  
H. V. Serdiuk ◽  
◽  
...  

Abstract: The article generalizes the features of modern transition from industrial to post-industrial (or knowledge-based) economy within the modernization paradigm for the states in the core and semi-periphery of the global economic system. It is proved that among the historical diversity of national modernization phenomena one can single out two alternative models: an innovative model and a catching-up one. It is substantiated that the innovative model is most typical for the countries forming the core of the world economic system, while the catching-up model is more typical for countries in the periphery of global development. It is revealed that modern intellectual production covers, first of all, economic sectors producing information and knowledge. At the same time, intellectual capital also functions in productive industries, influencing their indicators as well. That is why knowledge workers, who form the intellectual strata of society, are considered to be subjects of intangible intellectual production, the latter making up the core of knowledge economy. Their main function is to produce intellectual products (socially valuable knowledge), in contrast to groups, whose social function is to embody these values and knowledge. It should also be noted that concrete historical forms of knowledge objectivisation, ways of their reproduction and, accordingly, historical types of intellectual layers can differ considerably. It is concluded that knowledge-based economy is considered as a sphere of economic activity, which nowadays is characterized by intensive use of intellectual capital as the main economic resource, in the fields of material production as well.


2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 242-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Лапшин ◽  
Vyacheslav Lapshin ◽  
Лапшин ◽  
Nikita Lapshin

In article the various integrated indicators used at this stage of genesis of the concept of safety allowing to carry out, with a certain share of convention, monitoring of key parameters of economic security of economic system of Russia are considered. The attention to need of the comprehensive analysis of a big range of indicators on this perspective and synthesis from them priority which excess of critical levels causes emergence of the whole range of threats is focused, and their restriction demands expeditious state intervention – development of complex strategy of safety.


2021 ◽  
pp. 105-113
Author(s):  
Julia Yereshko

Introduction. One of the properties of the modern developed economy is the predominance of employment in the intangible and technological spheres, i.e., the neo-industrial economic system, as well as strengthening the role of intangible components: high-tech production and, in part, the active dependence of "simple" goods on the intellectual component of the enterprise: brands, reputation, competence (sometimes, even their personal qualities) of employees, PR, etc. Like any other resource, knowledge will acquire the properties of capital, only embodied as a productive force in the production process: the existence of knowledge, by itself, does not give it the characteristics of a value-generating mean, only its use by resource carriers turns this knowledge into capital. The aim of the article is to form a comprehensive view of intellectual capital as a factor of production from the standpoint of determining its role in the system of productive forces of society and value creation. The methodological basis of the research consists of general scientific theoretical methods of categories essence cognition, namely: dialectical analysis of phenomena causality, synthesis, methods of logical generalization; hypothesis. Results. To form a holistic view of the studied category, it is necessary to consider intellectual capital as a factor of production in the composition of "related" such factors in terms of defining not only singular, but also special and general for the systems of different orders, the objective source of which is human, i.e.: intellectual, human, social and labour capital. At the same time, the knowledge and labour, already separated from the carrier, that is, embodied in the "nonhuman" factors of production, we consider to be singular – inherent in the first of all above mentioned. It was determined that quite often intellectual capital is associated with intangible assets, however, a number of researchers identify it with human capital, social capital, and even "quality of labour". There was proved a necessity of structuring "human" productive factors, based on singular, special and general of these systems, which will allow a clear idea of intellectual capital and its structure. Using the concept of intellectual capital, in terms of its structure, its economic content and structure were concretized, namely: personal capital; human capital; structural capital; consumer capital; materialized capital. The study gives reason to talk about the intellectual capital as a source of innovative development and the new value creation. Thus, the prospect of further research is to substantiate the concept of intellectual economy as an economic system, the source of gross product of which is intellectual capital.


2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 72-81
Author(s):  
E. V. Kasatkina ◽  
D. D. Vavilova

Purpose of the study. The production sphere of the enterprise is a dynamic system of cash, material and information flows, in the framework of which the final product is formed, distributed between investments in production capital and own consumption. The task of choosing the optimal proportions of the distribution of the final product is relevant and practically significant for corporations in developing economies. The purpose of this work is, using mathematical modeling, to identify strategy for the optimal development of commercial enterprise, based on the volume of investment in factors of production and consumption norms and the accumulation profit of the enterprise.Materials and methods. To obtain scientific results, general scientific and specific research methods were used: analysis, synthesis, comparison, system analysis, parametric analysis, economic, mathematical and statistical research methods. The theoretical basis of the study is the fundamental work and publications of Russian and foreign scientists in the field of research of optimal management of the economic system of the enterprise. The authors proposed a methodological approach that distinguishes their research from others – a mathematical model of the balanced development of the economy of an economic entity is presented, where production capital, labor resources and intellectual capital are considered as factors of socio-economic development. The information base of the study is the data of the financial and accounting statements of the Public Joint Stock Company Rosneft Oil Company for the period 2006-2018.Results. The factors of development of the enterprise economy are highlighted, among which, in addition to the traditional approach, which includes capital and labor, intellectual capital is introduced into the main production factor. As a valuation of the intellectual capital of the enterprise, the costly method is used. Based on the cycle of reproduction of the enterprise’s activity, a balance equation of the enterprise’s activity model has been formed taking into account capital investments in production factors and consumption and profit accumulation rates. The criterion functional in the optimal management problem is the discounted profit of the enterprise. As a control, a function was selected that characterizes the share of investment in fixed assets, and as a state of the system, the ratio of the value of fixed assets to intellectual capital. The mathematical model of optimal development is applied to the economic system of the enterprise of PJSC NK “Rosneft”.Conclusion. Modeling the dynamics of production capital, labor resources and intellectual capital of PJSC NK “Rosneft” and the results of solving their optimal management problem show that to keep a production enterprise on a balanced growth path, 55% of net profit will be spent on developing the intellectual capital of the enterprise, 35% of net profit – to improve the state of production capital of Rosneft. Given the optimal management in the future for 2019-2022. projected annual revenue growth rate of 19.9%, fixed assets – 16.2% and annual net profit of the company –9.7%.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (4(58)) ◽  
pp. 38-41
Author(s):  
Julia Yereshko ◽  
Iryna Kreidych

The object of research is the role of the intellectual capital and knowledge in modern economics and value creation process. Therefore, taking into account the intellectual component of value due to the transformation of the society’s productive forces structure in the transition to a post-industrial economic system, there was proven the necessity of rethinking the existing theories of value. Based on the classic politeconomists, neoclassics and institutionalists groundwork analysis, there was defined the economic essence of the intellectual capital. This essence consisted in the people’s capacity, using the personal factor of production, rather part of it – the knowledge and intellect, to produce objectified factors. Also, there was justified the place of an intellectual capital in a system of productive forces – its feature of simultaneous affiliation to an immaterial (as a form of individual development), as far as to a material (applied knowledge) spheres. Due to active modern automation and robotics in manufacturing, labour as a factor of production is gradually replaced by knowledge: personal and ones materialized in the means of production. Thus, there are grounds for the assumption that namely knowledge, not labour, that is present in all spheres of social production, but rather, more accurately, the productive part of knowledge – an intellectual capital is the source of the value of goods in a post-industrial (neoindustrial) economic system. Modern economy has inherent significant share the intellectual component that participates in generating the innovative goods as the new value. Therefore, based on the above stated, the «intellectual theory of value» was formulated, which defines directions for the intellectual economics paradigm development in future.


Medical establishment is a complex socio-economic system, whose sustainable development should be ensured by the modern management practices. Problems of management of medical establishment have not been still considered in the context of the current reformation of healthcare sector and still this social and economic field does not report to the conditions of market mechanism. The main goal of this paper is to analyze a structure of total capital of modern medical establishment and the place and role of managerial capital in this structure. Methodology. This study combines economic analysis of concepts of total capital, physical capital, financial capital, intellectual capital and managerial capital. In this study complex of the general scientific and special research methods were used to achieve the goal of the study. The method of logical analysis of the literature was used. The structural analysis was used with purpose to generate the structure of total capital and its key elements of medical establishment. Method of summarization was used to make a conclusion. Scientific works of national and foreign leading scientists in this sphere were used as the informational basis for the conducted research. Findings. In the paper the issue of managerial capital of a medical establishment as a complex socio-economic system is researched. A structure of total capital of medical establishment with its main components, such as physical, financial and intellectual capital, is proposed. In their turn, the theoretical concept of intellectual capital considers the following its elements: human capital, organizational capital and consumer’s capital. Managerial capital is viewed as a meta-capital within the frameworks of proposed structure and is an effective management tool for medical establishments’ business processes and qualitative composition of all types of capital, which pursues the sustainable development of medical establishment. Main tasks of formation, development and reproduction of managerial capital of medical establishment are researched. Also the issues of institutional environment of forming management capital are researched. Key institutional determinants, such innovation, investment and structural mobility are considered. Practical implications. In the conditions of creating by Ukraine the new national healthcare system the issue of formation and development of managerial capital in healthcare sphere is of great importance. It should be considered in the current process of Ukrainian healthcare system’s reformation to avoid the mistakes. Value (originality). The results of conducted research could be a framework for formation of managerial capital of the medical


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-111
Author(s):  
Maria Markhaichuk ◽  
Irina Zhuckovskaya

Research background: The positive relationship between the availability of intellectual capital and the ability of the state, region or firm to develop economically stimulates an increase in the intellectual capital. In order to manage intellectual capital, it is necessary to have a clear idea of its availability, capacity, features, growth reserves, as well as concentration in certain territories and ability to spread. Many studies are devoted to the measurement of intellectual capital, its diffusion and impact on the economic efficiency of the organization, region, and nation. However, in the case of the Russian Federation there is a gap in the study of the spread of intellectual capital over the country. Purpose of the article: The purpose of the article is to evaluate intellectual capital in the federal districts of the Russian Federation and to model the spread of intellectual capital. Methods: Data on 8 Russian federal districts for the 2017 year from Unified Inter-departmental Information and Statistical System (EMISS) of the Russian Federation were taken as a basis for the research. Based on three-component model (human capital, structural capital, and relational capital), we formed a set of indicators for assessing regional intellectual capital, relevant to the Russian Federation. This allowed us to evaluate the integrated indicators of intellectual capital in federal districts and to determine the probability of intellectual capital spreading from each federal district to neighboring federal districts. We used percolation theory methods to model the spread of intellectual capital. Findings & Value added: The study contributes to the Russian regional knowledge on intellectual capital. Intellectual capital in the Russian Federation is disproportionately distributed, concentrating closer to the capital, and has a lower level in remote territories. It spreads unevenly, flowing from the Central Federal District to neighboring federal districts, however, other federal districts develop almost in isolation.


2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 116-124
Author(s):  
Yuliia Orlovska ◽  
Anzhela Cherchata ◽  
Olena Kovalenko

This research is devoted to revealing the theoretical and practical foundations of the intellectual economy formation in the conditions of post-industrial society transformation. Using the historical method of analysis, the authors has made the comparative assessment of the main approaches to explaining the content, factors and features of the intellectual economy development. It has been proved that the main driving force of economic development in the intellectual economy is knowledge, which simultaneously acts as both a resource and a product, and for that product specific demand at all levels of the economic system has been formed. In our view, the intellectual economy is a type of economic system that, being based on the intellectual capital of society in the conditions of development of modern information technologies and systems, uses, transforms, creates and disseminates information and knowledge in order to ensure the growth of social welfare, international competitiveness of countries and extended knowledge and innovation cycle formation. That is, knowledge is at the heart of the development of the economic system, and, at the same time, is the final product of this system in each cycle of reproduction of the socio-ecological-economic system. The determining direction of the transformations in the intellectual economy is predominantly the creation and consumption of knowledge as a different type of intellectual property, including its materialized form with a high intellectual component. The fact that knowledge and information are not only used as an inexhaustible cognitive resource for the development of production, but also turn into the main types of consumption associated with personal development, as a means of renewing and building up this resource, is the key to the endless progress of the intellectual economy. The special features and principles of development of intellectual economy have been explained in the paper. These features and principles have been suggested to use as criteria for the construction of national programs for the intellectual economy formation, as well as for these programs success estimation. The recommendations for overcoming the barriers to building Ukrainian intellectual economy have been elaborated.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document