scholarly journals Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Think Pair Share (TPS) Dan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Student Team Achievement Division (STAD) Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Pada Materi Garis Singgung Lingkaran

2018 ◽  
pp. 99
Author(s):  
Nurina Kurniasari Rahmawati ◽  
Iip Ripati Hanipah
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Junior High School ◽  
Hypothesis Test ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Homogeneity Test ◽  
Model Type ◽  
Fisher Test ◽  
Normality Test ◽  
Class Viii

This research is to prove whether the learning result of Student Mathematics with cooperative learning model of TPS type is better than the result of student learning of Mathematics with STAD type cooperative learning model on tangent material of circle. The population is the students of State Junior High School 1 East Cikarang. The sample was taken by using cluster random sampling technique from the population by randomized method, ie students of class VIII F and class VIII G as many as 60 students. The analysis test is done by normality test and homogeneity test. Normality test using Lilliefors test and Homogeneity test using Fisher test. While the hypothesis test using t-test. Based on the calculation obtained data that Lilliefors model of cooperative learning model type TPS Lhitung = 0.0954 and for Ltabel = 0.161 (0.0954 < 0.161) and for cooperative learning model type STAD = 0.1266 and for Ltabel = 0.161 (0, 1266 < 0.161), so it can be concluded that the cooperative learning model of TPS type and STAD type cooperative learning model come from the normally distributed population. Homogeneity test using Fisher test obtained Fhitung = 1.15 and Ftabel = 1.86 (1.15 < 1.86) so that TPS and STAD homogen. Hypothesis testing obtained thitung = 2.388 and ttable = 1.651. Because thitung > ttable then H0 is rejected. The conclusion of this research is there are difference of mathematics learning result of students using cooperative learning model of TPS type and mathematics learning result of students using STAD type cooperative learning model in tangent circle material in class VIII SMPN 1 Cikarang East Bekasi.

scholarly journals Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Make a Match dan Team Games Tournament terhadap Hasil Belajar

2018 ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Arie Purwa Kusuma ◽  
Ayunitis Khoirunnisa
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Hypothesis Test ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Homogeneity Test ◽  
Model Type ◽  
Fisher Test ◽  
Team Games ◽  
Normality Test ◽  
Learning Mathematics ◽  
Better Than

This study was conducted to determine whether the results of learning mathematics learners on the material to build a flat quadrilateral taught using Make a Match learning model is better than the TGT learning model. The sample was taken using cluster random sampling. The analysis test is done by normality test and homogeneity test. Normality test using Lilliefors test and Homogeneity test using Fisher test. Hypothesis test using t-test. Based on the calculation concluded the type of Make a Match cooperative learning model and TGT type cooperative learning model come from the normally distributed population. Homogeneity test using Fisher test can be concluded cooperative learning model type Make a Match and cooperative learning model type TGT same or homogeneous. Based on the hypothesis test, Ho is rejected. In conclusion, the result of learning mathematics of learners using Make a Match learning model is better than TGT learning model.  

scholarly journals Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Think Pair Share Terhadap Peningkatan Kompetensi Belajar Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam [Implementation of Think Pair Share Cooperative Learning Model on the Improvement of Science Learning Competencies]

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 265
Author(s):  
Rina Gusmiharti ◽  
Rahmadhani Fitri
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
T Test ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Homogeneity Test ◽  
Model Type ◽  
Normality Test ◽  
Class Viii ◽  
Learning Competencies

This study aims to look at the effect of the cooperative learning model type Think Pair Share on the improvement of the students' learning competencies in the material in the class VIII Excretion System in SMP 6 . This research is an experimental study with a Randomized Control Group Only Design study design. Sampling is done by using sampling technique, which is selected class VIII 2 as the experimental class and class VIII 1 as the control class. The research instrument used was the question for knowledge competence, the observation sheet for attitude competence. The hypothesis in this study was tested using a t test which was first carried out a prerequisite test, namely the normality test and homogeneity test. Based on the t-test it is known that the competencies of knowledge and competence in the attitude of &gt; t table are (2.56&gt; 1.67) and (5.48&gt; 1.67). This shows that the hypothesis is accepted. So it can be concluded that the application of the cooperative learning model type Think Pair Share can improve students' learning competencies in SMP 6 .

scholarly journals Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe TPS-TGT Pada Pembelajaran Matematikadi Kelas VIII SMPN 1 Makassar

2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 119-127
Author(s):  
Andi Aras
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Hypothesis Test ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Motivation ◽  
Student Responses ◽  
Student Activities ◽  
Model Type ◽  
High Category ◽  
Class Viii

ABSTRACTThis type of research is an experimental study which aims to describe theeffectiveness of the cooperative learning model TPS-TGT type in mathematicslearning in class VIII SMP N 1 Makassar. The sample in this study class VIII.5 wastaught by cooperative learning model TPS-TGT type taken using techniques clusterrandom sampling. The data collected consisted of data on student learningoutcomes, data on learners' motivation, data on student activities during thelearning process, and data on student responses to the application of cooperativelearning models of the TPS-TGT type.The results showed that the score of mathematics learning outcomes of students inclass VIII.5 was in the high category with a mean of 80.15 and a standarddeviation of 9.79, completeness in classics was 82.5%, the average normalizedgain was in the high category, scores the average learning motivation of students isin the high category, the average gain normalized learning motivation is in themedium category, the activity of students in following the learning process is in agood category, and student responses to the application of the cooperative learningmodel TPS-TGT type are positive. In general, it was concluded that the cooperativelearning model type TPS-TGT was effectively applied to mathematics learning inclass VIII.5 of SMP N 1 Makassar.The results of the hypothesis test at a significant level α = 0.05 with the t-test showthat H1 is accepted which means that the cooperative learning model type TPSTGTis effectively applied to mathematics learning in SPLDV material in class VIIIof SMP N 1 Makassar.

scholarly journals EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE JIGSAW DAN NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER PADA POKOK BAHASAN BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN INTERPERSONAL SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI DI KOTA MADIUN

2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kiki Riska Ayu Kurniawati ◽  
Budiyono Budiyono ◽  
Dewi Retno Sari S
Keyword(s):  
Mathematics Achievement ◽  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Junior High School ◽  
Hypothesis Test ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Direct Learning

<p><strong>Abstract</strong>: The aims of this research were to find out the different effect of each categories of learning model, students interpersonal intelligence and their interaction towards students mathematics learning achievement on the subject of plane geometry. The research was quasi experimental with 3×3 factorial design. The population was all students of grade VIII State Junior High School in Madiun City on the second semester of 2013/2014 academic years. Sampling was done by stratified cluster random sampling technique. The sample of this research consisted of the students of SMP N 3 Madiun, SMPN 7 Madiun, and SMPN 10 Madiun. The sample consisted of 260 students. The hypothesis test used unbalanced two ways analysis of variance at the significance level of 0,05. Based on hypothesis test, it can be concluded that: (1) the cooperative learning model of <em>Jigsaw</em> type gives a better mathematics achievement than cooperative learning model of NHT type and direct learning model, and the cooperative learning model of NHT type gives a better mathematics achievement than direct learning model; (2) students with the high interpersonal intelligence had the same achievement as students with the medium interpersonal intelligence, students with the high interpersonal intelligence had better achievement than students with the low interpersonal intelligence and the students with the medium interpersonal intelligence had the same achievement as students with the low interpersonal intelligence; (3) on the cooperative learning model of <em>Jigsaw</em> type, NHT type and direct learning model, students with the high interpersonal intelligence had the same achievement as students with the medium interpersonal intelligence, students with the high interpersonal intelligence had better achievement than students with the low interpersonal intelligence and the students with the medium interpersonal intelligence had the same achievement as students with the low interpersonal intelligence; and (4) on students interpersonal intelligence high, medium and low, the cooperative learning model of <em>Jigsaw</em> type gives a better mathematics achievement than cooperative learning model of NHT type and direct learning model, and the cooperative learning model of NHT type gives a better mathematics achievement than direct learning model.</p><p><strong>Keywords</strong>:  <em>Jigsaw</em>, NHT, interpersonal intelligence</p>

scholarly journals Perbedaan Prestasi Siswa Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe STAD dan NHT Materi Koordinat Kartesius

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 285-296
Author(s):  
Rahman Hidayat ◽  
Sripatmi Sripatmi ◽  
Muhammad Turmuzi ◽  
Nani Kurniati
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Hypothesis Test ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
School Year ◽  
Class Viii ◽  
Implementation Data ◽  
Student Team

This study aims to determine whether there are differences in maths learning achievement between classes taught by cooperative learning model Student Team Achievement Division (STAD) type and class taught by cooperative learning type Numbered Head Together (NHT) in material sistim coordinat cartesius class VIII SMP Negeri 1 Kediri 2018/2019 school year. Data collection techniques in this study are test techniques with instruments in the form of learning achievement test, learning implementation observasion sheets and learning implementation. Data analysis techniques use descriptive statistics. Hypothesis test of students' final ability (posstest) with t-test of two parties at a significance level of 5% resulted in tcount <ttable namely 0,020 < 2.030 which means that there were nothing differences in mathematics learning achievement between classes taught by cooperative learning model Student Team Achievement Division ( STAD) and classes taught by the cooperative learning model Numbered Head Together (NHT) in material sistim coordinat cartesius class VIII SMP Negeri 1 Kediri academic year 2018/2019.

HASIL BELAJAR KOGNITIF SISWA MELALUI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE AIR DAN NHT

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Idham Kamil ◽  
Kashardi Kashardi
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Mathematical Understanding ◽  
Class I ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Model Type ◽  
Class Viii

This study aims to find out the significant differences between students' mathematical understanding abilities that are taught using the Cooperative Learning Model type Auditory Intellectualy Receptition (AIR), Numbered Heads Together (NHT), and conventional learning models, and which learning model gives better results to improve students' mathematical understanding abilities. This type of research is quasi-experimental. The population in this study was class VIII 27 of Seluma State Junior High School consisting of 4 classes. The sample of this study was chosen 3 classes randomly, namely class VIII A as the experimental class I using the Cooperative learning model type Auditory Intellectualy Receptition (AIR), class VIII B as the experimental class II using the cooperative learning model type Numbered Heads Together (NHT), and Class VIII C as a control class using conventional learning models. Data collection on student mathematics learning outcomes in the form of tests consisting of pre-test and post-test. Data were analyzed using ANAVA and BNT. Based on ANAVA results, there are differences between students' mathematics learning outcomes in experimental class I, experimental class II, and control class. Based on the LSD test it was found that the treatment between the experimental class I with the experimental class II, the experimental class I with the control class, and the experimental class II with the control class there were differences. Auditory IntellectualyReceptition (AIR) cooperative learning model provides better results than the Numbered Heads Together (NHT) type of cooperative learning model and Conventional learning model.Keywords: mathematical understanding ability,  AIR,  NHT, learning model

scholarly journals The Effect of the application of the Cooperative Learning Model Type Snowball Throwing Against an increase in the activity of learning to the learners on subjects Science in grade VII Inclusive SMPN 23 Padang

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 178
Author(s):  
Eliza Octa Khairani ◽  
Ristiono Ristiono ◽  
Helendra Helendra ◽  
Resti Fevria
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Junior High School ◽  
Hypothesis Test ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Activities ◽  
Inclusive Classroom ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Model Type ◽  
Average Value ◽  
Value Of Learning

The research was distributed by the low activity of learning to learners in an inclusive classroom while learning the IPA take place where student activity still centered on teachers so that students not actively in learning. This research aims to find out how big the influence of cooperative learning model type Snowball Throwing against learning activities learners in learning the IPA in the VII  inclusive classroom junior high school 23 Padang. This type of research is the Quasy alphabets experiment using Control-Group design Only. This research was carried out in class VII2 as class experiments with the number of learners 32 people (with 3 learners ABK) and VII3 class as the class of the control to the number of learners 32 people (with 2 of HER students). The instruments used in the research in the form of the now learners learning activities that contains items of the statement drawn up in accordance with a predetermined indicators. Data analysis technique used is comparing the difference of two average learners with learning activities begins conducting a test of its homogeneity and normality, so that in the end done with test t (t-test).The average value of learning activities students class experiments is higher compared to the average value of learning activities learners class control. The average value of experimental class 76.41 and average value of kotrol class 70.08. Hypothesis test results data study activity learners class Sample thitung 2.67 and ttabel 1.67 its mean thitung > ttabel means then the hypothesis is accepted. This means that applying cooperative learning model type Snowball Throwing a positive effect against an increase in the activity of learning to the learners.

scholarly journals EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE JIGSAW DENGAN PENDEKATAN CTL TERHADAP PRESTASI BELAJAR DAN ASPEK AFEKTIF SISWA PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN SPASIAL

2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Habib Ratu Perwira Negara ◽  
Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi ◽  
Imam Sujadi
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Spatial Ability ◽  
Junior High School ◽  
Hypothesis Test ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Ability Test ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Direct Learning

<p><strong>Abstract</strong><strong>: </strong>The aims of this research were to find out the different effect of the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type with CTL approach, the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type, and the direct learning model towards students mathematics learning achievement and affective aspect on the subject of plane geometry viewed from the students spatial ability, and category of spatial ability consisted of high, medium and low. The research was quasi experimental. The population was all students of grade VIII State Junior High School in Madiun City on the second semester of 2013/2014 academic years. The sample of this research consisted of 261 students. The instrument used to collect data was mathematics achievement test, questionnaire of students affective aspect and spatial ability test. The hypothesis test used unbalanced two ways multivariate analysis of variance. The results of the research were as follows. (1) The cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type with CTL approach and the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type gaves a better achievement than direct learning model, and the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type with CTL approach gaves the same achievement as the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type. (2) The cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type with CTL approach gaves a better achievement than the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type and direct learning model, and the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type gaves a better achievement than direct learning model. (3) Students with the high spatial ability had better achievement than students with the medium and low spatial ability, and students with the medium spatial ability had better achievement than students with the low spatial ability. (4) Students with the high spatial ability had better affective aspect than students with the medium and low spatial ability, and students with the medium spatial ability had the same affective aspect as students with the the low spatial ability. (5) On the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type with CTL approach, Jigsaw type and direct learning model, students with the high spatial ability had better achievement than students with the medium and low spatial ability, and students with the medium spatial ability had better achievement than students with the low spatial ability. (6) On the cooperative learning models of Jigsaw type with CTL approach and Jigsaw type, students with the high, medium and low spatial ability had the same affective aspects. On the direct learning model, students with the high spatial ability had better affective aspects than students with the medium spatial ability, while students with the high and low spatial ability and students with the medium and low spatial ability had the same affective aspects. (7) On students spatial ability high, medium and low, the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type with CTL approach and the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type gaves a better achievement than direct learning model, and the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type with CTL approach gaves the same achievement as the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type. (8) On students with the high and medium spatial ability, the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type with CTL approach, Jigsaw type and direct learning model gives the same affective aspect. On students with the medium spatial ability, the cooperative learning of Jigsaw type with CTL approach gaves a better affective aspect than the direct learning model, while the cooperative learning of Jigsaw type with CTL approach and Jigsaw and also the cooperative learning of Jigsaw type and direct learning model gaves the same affective aspect.</p><p><strong>Keywords</strong>: Jigsaw, CTL approach, spatial ability, learning achievement, and affective aspect. </p>

scholarly journals Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Group Investigation (GI) Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa SMP

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 590-596
Author(s):  
Ika Kurniawati ◽  
Laila Hayati ◽  
Nurul Hikmah ◽  
Nyoman Sridana
Keyword(s):  
High School Students ◽  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Junior High School ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Homogeneity Test ◽  
School Students ◽  
Two Samples

This research is a quasi-experimental study that aims to determine the effect of the Group Investigation (GI) type of cooperative learning model on the mathematics learning outcomes of junior high school students. The population in this study were all VIII grade students of SMP Negeri 2 Kediri, which were divided into three classes. The research sample of two classes was taken by the purposive sampling technique. The data collection technique using tests and observation sheets. The experimental class uses a Group Investigation (GI) type of cooperative learning model and the control class uses a direct learning model. The sample in the study was class VIII-A as the experimental class and class VIIIB as the control class. The normality test and homogeneity test showed that the two samples were normally distributed and homogeneous. The data analysis using t test with  show  and  so  is rejected. So it can be concluded that there is an effect of the Group Investigation (GI) type of cooperative learning model on students mathematics learning outcomes. To find out how much the effect of the Group Investigation (GI) type of cooperative learning model has on the students mathematics learning outcomes, it can be done by using effect size calculations with Cohen’s formula and the calculation results are 1.18 including in the high category. This means that the application of the Group Investigation (GI) type of cooperative learning model has a high effect on the mathematics learning outcomes of VIII grade students of SMP Negeri 2 kediri academic year 2021/2022

STUDI KOMPARATIF MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TAI (TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION) DAN STAD (STUDENT TEAM ACHIEVEMENT DIVISION) TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR PADA MATAKULIAH AKUNTANSI DI UNIVERSITAS ISLAM NEGERI (UIN) MALANG

2014 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Kusumadyahdewi Kusumadyahdewi
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Hypothesis Test ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Homogeneity Test ◽  
Model Type ◽  
Average Mark ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Student Team

<p>Purpose of this research is to understand the differences of learning outcomes using Cooperative learning model type TAl (Team Assisted Individualization) and STAD (Student Team Achievement Division) on the subject Accounting, Social Sciences Education Department of Tarbiyah and Teaching Sciences of Maulana Malik lbrahim State Islamic University of Malang. This research using Experimental research design Quasi Experiment, and the model using Pre-Test and Post-Test Control Group Design. Population of this research is all students of first semester Year 2013/2014, and the sample are class A as the experiment group who using TAI model and class B as the control group who study using STAD model. There are two instruments in this research, such as treatment instrument and measurement instrument. Researcher used hypothesis test to know the differences of learning outcomes, t-test in which previously conducted the prerequisite test analysis which consist of normality test, homogeneity test, and the equality test of average initial ability of student. Result of this research shows the difference of average mark in cognitive aspects in these classes is not significant but the average mark TAI class higher than STAD class, but there is a significant difference in psychomotor aspects in these classes. It can be showing the average mark of TAI also higher than STAD.</p><p>Keywords: Learning Outcomes, Cooperative Learning Model type TAI, STAD</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document