scholarly journals Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Make a Match dan Team Games Tournament terhadap Hasil Belajar

2018 ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Arie Purwa Kusuma ◽  
Ayunitis Khoirunnisa
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Hypothesis Test ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Homogeneity Test ◽  
Model Type ◽  
Fisher Test ◽  
Team Games ◽  
Normality Test ◽  
Learning Mathematics ◽  
Better Than

This study was conducted to determine whether the results of learning mathematics learners on the material to build a flat quadrilateral taught using Make a Match learning model is better than the TGT learning model. The sample was taken using cluster random sampling. The analysis test is done by normality test and homogeneity test. Normality test using Lilliefors test and Homogeneity test using Fisher test. Hypothesis test using t-test. Based on the calculation concluded the type of Make a Match cooperative learning model and TGT type cooperative learning model come from the normally distributed population. Homogeneity test using Fisher test can be concluded cooperative learning model type Make a Match and cooperative learning model type TGT same or homogeneous. Based on the hypothesis test, Ho is rejected. In conclusion, the result of learning mathematics of learners using Make a Match learning model is better than TGT learning model.  

scholarly journals Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Think Pair Share (TPS) Dan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Student Team Achievement Division (STAD) Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Pada Materi Garis Singgung Lingkaran

2018 ◽  
pp. 99
Author(s):  
Nurina Kurniasari Rahmawati ◽  
Iip Ripati Hanipah
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Junior High School ◽  
Hypothesis Test ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Homogeneity Test ◽  
Model Type ◽  
Fisher Test ◽  
Normality Test ◽  
Class Viii

This research is to prove whether the learning result of Student Mathematics with cooperative learning model of TPS type is better than the result of student learning of Mathematics with STAD type cooperative learning model on tangent material of circle. The population is the students of State Junior High School 1 East Cikarang. The sample was taken by using cluster random sampling technique from the population by randomized method, ie students of class VIII F and class VIII G as many as 60 students. The analysis test is done by normality test and homogeneity test. Normality test using Lilliefors test and Homogeneity test using Fisher test. While the hypothesis test using t-test. Based on the calculation obtained data that Lilliefors model of cooperative learning model type TPS Lhitung = 0.0954 and for Ltabel = 0.161 (0.0954 < 0.161) and for cooperative learning model type STAD = 0.1266 and for Ltabel = 0.161 (0, 1266 < 0.161), so it can be concluded that the cooperative learning model of TPS type and STAD type cooperative learning model come from the normally distributed population. Homogeneity test using Fisher test obtained Fhitung = 1.15 and Ftabel = 1.86 (1.15 < 1.86) so that TPS and STAD homogen. Hypothesis testing obtained thitung = 2.388 and ttable = 1.651. Because thitung > ttable then H0 is rejected. The conclusion of this research is there are difference of mathematics learning result of students using cooperative learning model of TPS type and mathematics learning result of students using STAD type cooperative learning model in tangent circle material in class VIII SMPN 1 Cikarang East Bekasi.

STUDI KOMPARATIF MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TAI (TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION) DAN STAD (STUDENT TEAM ACHIEVEMENT DIVISION) TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR PADA MATAKULIAH AKUNTANSI DI UNIVERSITAS ISLAM NEGERI (UIN) MALANG

2014 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Kusumadyahdewi Kusumadyahdewi
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Hypothesis Test ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Homogeneity Test ◽  
Model Type ◽  
Average Mark ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Student Team

<p>Purpose of this research is to understand the differences of learning outcomes using Cooperative learning model type TAl (Team Assisted Individualization) and STAD (Student Team Achievement Division) on the subject Accounting, Social Sciences Education Department of Tarbiyah and Teaching Sciences of Maulana Malik lbrahim State Islamic University of Malang. This research using Experimental research design Quasi Experiment, and the model using Pre-Test and Post-Test Control Group Design. Population of this research is all students of first semester Year 2013/2014, and the sample are class A as the experiment group who using TAI model and class B as the control group who study using STAD model. There are two instruments in this research, such as treatment instrument and measurement instrument. Researcher used hypothesis test to know the differences of learning outcomes, t-test in which previously conducted the prerequisite test analysis which consist of normality test, homogeneity test, and the equality test of average initial ability of student. Result of this research shows the difference of average mark in cognitive aspects in these classes is not significant but the average mark TAI class higher than STAD class, but there is a significant difference in psychomotor aspects in these classes. It can be showing the average mark of TAI also higher than STAD.</p><p>Keywords: Learning Outcomes, Cooperative Learning Model type TAI, STAD</p>

scholarly journals Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Think Pair Share Terhadap Peningkatan Kompetensi Belajar Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam [Implementation of Think Pair Share Cooperative Learning Model on the Improvement of Science Learning Competencies]

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 265
Author(s):  
Rina Gusmiharti ◽  
Rahmadhani Fitri
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
T Test ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Homogeneity Test ◽  
Model Type ◽  
Normality Test ◽  
Class Viii ◽  
Learning Competencies

This study aims to look at the effect of the cooperative learning model type Think Pair Share on the improvement of the students' learning competencies in the material in the class VIII Excretion System in SMP 6 . This research is an experimental study with a Randomized Control Group Only Design study design. Sampling is done by using sampling technique, which is selected class VIII 2 as the experimental class and class VIII 1 as the control class. The research instrument used was the question for knowledge competence, the observation sheet for attitude competence. The hypothesis in this study was tested using a t test which was first carried out a prerequisite test, namely the normality test and homogeneity test. Based on the t-test it is known that the competencies of knowledge and competence in the attitude of &gt; t table are (2.56&gt; 1.67) and (5.48&gt; 1.67). This shows that the hypothesis is accepted. So it can be concluded that the application of the cooperative learning model type Think Pair Share can improve students' learning competencies in SMP 6 .

scholarly journals Perbandingan Model Pembelajaran Discovery Learning dan Talking Stick terhadap Hasil Belajar

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 77-81
Author(s):  
Zainal Arifin
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Quantitative Research ◽  
Hypothesis Test ◽  
Analysis Data ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Discovery Learning ◽  
Homogeneity Test ◽  
Average Value ◽  
Normality Test ◽  
Post Test

Based on the statement of the problem how the comparison of students learning out comes used Learning model Discovery Learning and Talking Stick. Cooperative Learning model Discovery Learning and Talking Stick are one of model that are usually used in the mathematic Learning the advantage of them are can stimulate the development ability to think creatively and comprehensive, and stimulate student in order to more achre study. The purpose of this research was to know what it is there or no the comparison cooperative learning model Discovery Learning and Talking Stick of learning out come. The kind of this research was quantitative research with using the true experimental design post-test only control design. Before The researcher analysis data, I used the normality test and homogeneity test hypothesis test in data’s analysis. From the analysis result obtained the average value of class that was given cooperative Learning model type Talking Stick (control class) was higher than average role of class that was given cooperative learning model Discovery Learning (experiment class) by using the 5% error test then obtained -0,74<1.68, so t count t-table. The conclusion Ho was accepted, it mean that there was comparison cooperative Learning model Discovery Learning and Talking Stick to learning outcome.

scholarly journals Perbandingan Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa yang Diajar Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Think Talk Write dan Tipe Two Stay Two Stray di Kelas VII SMP Negeri 22 Medan

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marojahan Panjaitan ◽  
Regen Rafael Alviandi
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Communication Skills ◽  
Hypothesis Test ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Homogeneity Test ◽  
Mathematical Communication ◽  
Class Viii ◽  
Communication Ability ◽  
Essay Test ◽  
Better Than

ABSTRAK Penelitian ini bertujuan Untuk mengetahui apakah kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa yang diajar dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TTW lebih baik dari kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa yang diajar dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TSTS.  Sampel dalam penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas VIII-4 dan kelas VIII-2 dengan banyak masing-masing siswa ada kelas yang diteliti 40 orang. Kelas VIII-4 diberi model pembelajaran TTW dan kelas VIII-2 diberi model pembelajaran TSTS. Instrumen dalam penelitian ini berupa soal pre-tes dan post-tes yang bentuknya sama. Tes ini berbentuk essay test yang banyaknya 8 soal, sebelum tes kemampuan komunikasi diberikan kepada sampel terlebih dahulu tes divalidasi oleh validator. Jenis penelitian ini adalah eksperimen semu. Teknik analisis data yang digunakan adalah uji normalitas, uji homogenitas dan uji hipotesis. Hasil pretest dan postest di kelas VIII-4 secara berurutan adalah 54,60 dan 77,89. Hasil pretest dan posttest di kelas VIII-2 secara berurutan adalah 53,67 dan 71,32. Hasil pretest diuji t dua pihak dan didapat hasilnya bahwa kemampuan awal kedua kelas tersebut sama. Hasil ketuntasan kelas yang diberi model pembelajaran TTW adalah tuntas sedangkan   kelas yang diberi model pembelajaran TSTS tidak tuntas, hal ini ditunjukkan dari presentase ketuntasan kelas yang diberi TTW sebesar 85% sedangkan presentase ketuntasan kelas yang diberi TSTS hanya sebesar 55%. Pada uji hipotesis yang menggunakan uji t dengan menggunakan hasil dan postest di kedua kelas diperoleh 2,438 dan  =1,667. Karena , sehingga  ditolak dan  diterima sehingga diperoleh kesimpulan bahwa kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa yang diajar dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TTW lebih baik dari kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa yang diajar dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TSTS..Kata Kunci : eksperimen semu, Think Talk Write, Two Stay Two Stray ABSTRACTThis research aims to determine whether the mathematical communication skills of students who are taught using cooperative learning model TTW type better than the mathematical communication skills of students who were taught by using cooperative learning model TSTS type in SMP Negeri 22 Medan.  The sample in this study Is a student of class VIII-4 and class VIII-2 with many of each students there is a class which researched 40 people. Class VIII-4 was given a TTW learning model and class VIII-2 was given a TSTS learning model. Instrument in this research is a matter of pre-test and post-test that same shape. This test is essay test that the number of 8 questions, before the test of communication ability is given to the sample test first validated by the validator. This type of research is a pseudo experiment. Data analysis technique used is normality test, homogeneity test and hypothesis test. The pretest and posttest results in Grade VIII-4 sequentially are 54.60 and 77.89. The results of pretest and posttest in class VIII-2 sequentially are 53.67 and 71.32. The pretest result is tested by two parties and the result is that the initial ability of the two classes is the same. The result of class completeness given by model of TTW learning is complete while class which given by model of TSTS learning is not complete, it is shown from percentage of completeness of class given TTW equal to 85% whereas percentage of completeness of class given TSTS only equal to 55%. In hypothesis test using t test by using result and postest in both classes obtained 2,438 and   =1,667. Because , so  rejected and accepted so that obtained by conclusion that mathematical communication ability of student who taught by using cooperative learning model of TTW type better than mathematical communication ability of student taught by using cooperative learning model TSTS type in SMP Negeri 22 Medan.Keywords : Quasi Experiments, Think Talk Write, Two Stay Two Stray 

THE EFFECT OF COOPERATIVE LEARNING MODEL TYPE CIRC ON SHORT STORY WRITING ABILITY CLASS X STUDENTS OF SMANEGERI SUNGAI PENUH PROVINSI JAMBI

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 175
Author(s):  
Sinta Wahyuni
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Short Story ◽  
Research Finding ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Writing Ability ◽  
Model Type ◽  
Writing Skill ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Story Writing ◽  
Better Than

This Study aimed at investigating the effect of cooperative learning model type CIRC on short story writing ability class x student of SMA Negeri 2 Sungai Penuh. In addition to that, aquantitative method with a quasi experimental design. Based on research finding conclusions short story writing skill of student with cooperative learning model type CIRC is better than studentthat being taught by conventional method at X class SMAN 2 Sungai Penuh.

scholarly journals PERBEDAAN PEMAHAMAN KONSEP MATEMATIKA ANTARA SISWA YANG BELAJAR DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE JIGSAW DAN KONVENSIONAL

Aksioma ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 171-178
Author(s):  
Siti Hadijah ◽  
Sutji Rochaminah ◽  
Maxinus Jaeng
Keyword(s):  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Hypothesis Test ◽  
Control Design ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Average Score ◽  
Concept Understanding ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling ◽  
Better Than

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui apakah pemahaman konsep matematika siswa yang belajar dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe jigsaw lebih baik daripada pemahaman konsep matematika siswa yang belajar dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran konvensional di Kelas IX MTs Negeri 1 Kota Palu. Hipotesis penelitian ini adalah pemahaman konsep matematika siswa yang belajar dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe jigsaw lebih baik daripada pemahaman konsep matematika siswa yang belajar dengan menggunakan pembelajaran konvensional. Jenis penelitian ini adalah eksperimen semu. Desain penelitian ini adalah pre-post test control design. Populasi penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas IX MTs Negeri 1 Kota Palu dengan teknik pengambilan sampel cluster random sampling. Nilai rata-rata siswa kelas eksperimen 47 dan standar deviasi 17,04 sedangkan nilai rata-rata siswa kelas kontrol 40 dan standar deviasi 13,40. Data yang diperoleh berdistribusi normal dan homogen, maka pengujian hipotesis menggunakan teknis statistik parametris yaitu uji t. Hasil pengujian hipotesis diperoleh bahwa nilai ????tabel = 1,67 dan ????hitung = 2,96 sehingga H1 diterima dan H0 ditolak. Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa pemahaman konsep matematika siswa yang belajar dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe jigsaw lebih baik daripada pemahaman konsep matematika siswa yang belajar dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran konvensional di kelas IX MTsN 1 Kota Palu. Kata Kunci:   Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Jigsaw, Model Pembelajaran Konvensional,  dan Pemahaman Konsep   Abstract: This research purposed to determine is mathematics concept understanding students who learn by using jigsaw cooperative learning model better than students who learn by using conventional learning model in class IX MTs Negeri 1 Kota Palu. The hypothesis is that mathematics concept understanding students who learn by using jigsaw cooperative learning model better than students who learn by using conventional learning model. The type of research is a quasi experiment. Design of research is pre-post control design. The population of this research is all students of class IX  MTs Negeri 1 Kota Palu with samples taken by cluster random sampling technique. The average score of the experiment class students is 47 and standard deviation is 17.04 and the average score of the control class students is 40 and standard deviation is 13.40. The data is normal distribution and homogen, hypothesis test using t test. Results of hypothesis test obtained value ????table = 1.67 and ????count = 2.96 it means H1 is accepted and H0 is rejected. This indicated that mathematics concept understanding students who learn by using jigsaw cooperative learning model have better than mathematics concept understanding students who learn by using conventional learning model in class IX MTsN 1 Kota Palu. Keywords:  Jigsaw Cooperative Learning Model, Conventional Learning Model, and Concept Understanding

scholarly journals Motivasi dan Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Siswa dengan Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Pair Check Disertai Reward Pada Materi Fungsi

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rivdya Eliza ◽  
Khadijah Khadijah ◽  
Utari Wulandari
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Student Motivation ◽  
Test Score ◽  
Mathematical Reasoning ◽  
Hypothesis Test ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Reasoning Ability ◽  
Model Type ◽  
Class Test

The purpose of this study is 1) To know the motivation to learn mathematics of taught by using cooperative learning model type Pair Check with reward higher than student motivation taught by convensional learning,and 2) To know the mathematical reasoning ability which was taught by using cooperative learning model type Pair Check with reward on material function is higher than students mathematical reasoning ability taught by convensional learning. This type of research is Quasi Experimental Research with Randomized Control Group Only Design. The population in this study is all eighth grade student of SMPN 19 Padang. In obtaining the sample class it is need to be done normality, homogeneity and equality of classroom average tests the class selected as the experimental class is VIII.5 class and the control class is VIII.3. The result of the research shows that 1) learning motivation of students which was taught by using cooperative learning Pair Check model with Reward is higher than student’s motivation taught by convensional learning. Hypothesis test that is t-score (7.034) > t-table (1.67), 2) students' mathematical reasoning ability after being taught by cooperative model type Pair Check with reward is higher than the students' mathematical reasoning abilities taught by conventional learning models. Seen from the average score of the experimental class test score of 80.16 and the average of the control class test score of 74.13. After hypothesis testing using t-test, obtained tscore > t-table (1.867 > 1.67) at 95%. So it can be student mathematical reasoning ability of class VIII SMPN 19 Padang which is taught by cooperative learning model type Pair Check with reward is higher than taught by using conventional learning.Keywords: Mathematic Reasoning Ability And Student Motivation, Model Cooperative Type Pair Check, Reward Fungsi, And Mathematic

scholarly journals The Impact of the Implementation Three-Step Interview Cooperative Learning Model in Mathematics Learning Toward the Learners’ Activities And Outcomes

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 8
Author(s):  
Usmadi Usmadi ◽  
Hayatul Hasanah ◽  
Ergusni Ergusni
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Activities ◽  
Learning Mathematics ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Step Type ◽  
Better Than

This study is motivated by the issues found in observations at school, where the daily teaching activities carried out by teachers show that; teaching and learning activities are classical, the teacher only stands or sits in front of the class, the direct relationship between the teacher and students is rare, and students tend to behave passively, such as coming, listening, reading and writing. To overcome this issues, the researchers conducted a research by applying a three-step type of cooperative learning model interview in learning mathematics in the class. The purpose of this study is to reveal the activities and learning outcomes of students after applying the three-step interview type cooperative learning model. From the results of the study it was found that the learning activities of students during the application of the three step interview cooperative learning model increased at each meeting. Thus it can be concluded that the mathematics learning outcomes of students with learning by applying a three-step interview type cooperative learning model is better than those who do not apply the techniques.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document