scholarly journals Kekerasan Verbal dalam Merespons Status dan Komentar Politik di Media Sosial dan Implikasinya terhadap Kesantunan Berbahasa

SUAR BETANG ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Duddy Zein ◽  
NFN Wagiati
Keyword(s):  
Social Media ◽  
Presidential Election ◽  
Speech Acts ◽  
Mass Communication ◽  
Political Discourse ◽  
Presidential Candidate ◽  
Expressive Speech ◽  
Verbal Violence ◽  
Descriptive Method

This paper is entitled "Verbal Violence in Responding to Status and Political Comments on Social Media and Its Implications to Language Politeness". This study examines patterns of verbal violence displayed by supporters of candidate pairs in responding to political discourse on the 2019 presidential election. The focus of the study is about mass communication which shows the existence of verbal violence and its implications for language politeness. This research uses a descriptive method. The data analyzed in this research are comments, status, and tweets as response from netizens who support presidential candidate pairs in the 2019 presidential election. Data is taken from several social media, such as Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Line, and Whatsapp. Determination of the research object is done with purposive considerations. The results showed that (1) on various occasions on social media, supporters of each pair of candidates dominantly use expressive speech acts; (2) supporters of candidate pairs often violate the principles of politeness, namely violating the maxims of wisdom, generosity, praise, humility, agreement, and sympathy; (3) the existence of verbal violence is caused by messages conveyed through social media which tend to be free, without having to go through the gate keeper process.AbstrakTulisan ini berjudul “Kekerasan Verbal dalam Merespons Status dan Komentar Politik di Media Sosial dan Implikasinya terhadap Kesantunan Berbahasa”. Penelitian ini mengkaji pola-pola kekerasan verbal yang ditampilkan oleh para pendukung pasangan calon dalam merespons wacana politik pemilihan presiden pada tahun 2019. Fokus kajian pada penelitian ini adalah komunikasi massa yang memperlihatkan adanya kekerasan verbal dan implikasinya terhadap kesantunan berbahasa. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode deskriptif. Data yang dianalisis dalam penelitin ini berupa komentar, status, dan tweet sebagai respons dari netizen pendukung pasangan calon presiden pada pemilihan presiden tahun 2019 terhadap wacana politik pilpres tersebut. Data diambil dari beberapa media sosial, seperti Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Line, dan Whatsapp. Penentuan objek penelitian dilakukan dengan pertimbangan purposif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa (1) dalam berbagai kesempatan di media sosial, para pendukung setiap pasangan calon secara dominan menggunakan tindak tutur ekspresif; (2) para pendukung paslon kerap kali melanggar prinsip-prinsip kesantunan, yaitu pelanggaran terhadap maksim kearifan, kedermawanan, pujian, kerendahan hati, kesepakatan, dan kesimpatian; (3) adanya kekerasan verbal disebabkan oleh pesan yang disampaikan lewat media sosial cenderung bebas, tanpa harus melalui proses gate keeper.

scholarly journals TINDAK TUTUR KOMISIF DAN EKSPRESIF DALAM DEBAT CAPRES-CAWAPRES PADA PILPRES 2019

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 36
Author(s):  
Febriani Khatimah Herfani ◽  
Ngusman Abdul Manaf
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Research ◽  
Data Analysis ◽  
Presidential Election ◽  
Speech Acts ◽  
Presidential Candidate ◽  
Presidential Debates ◽  
Expressive Speech ◽  
Presidential Candidates ◽  
Data Source ◽  
Presidential Debate

This study aims to: (1) formulate the types of commissive speech acts used by presidential and vice presidential candidates in the presidential and vice presidential debates at the 2019 presidential election, (3) formulate the types of expressive speech acts used by presidential and vice presidential candidates in the presidential and vice presidential debates at the 2019 presidential election, (2) formulating the speech strategy used by presidential and vice presidential candidates in the presidential and vice presidential debates at the 2019 presidential election. This type of research is a qualitative research with descriptive methods. The data source in this study is the speech of the 2019 presidential and vice presidential candidates downloaded via Youtube. Based on the results of data analysis, three findings were concluded. First, the types of commissive speech acts used by presidential and vice-presidential candidates in the presidential and vice presidential debates at the presidential election, namely (1) promising, (2) vowing, (3) offering, (4) swearing, and (5) intending. Second, the types of expressive speech acts that exist in the vice presidential debate in the 2019 presidential election are, (1) congratulate, (2) say thank you, (3) apologize, (4) praise, (5) criticize, (6) insinuate , and (7) complaining. Third, the speech strategy used in the vice presidential candidate debate in the 2019 presidential election, (1) speaking without further ado, (2) speaking with positive politeness politeness, (3) speaking with negative politeness pleasantries, and (4) speak vaguely.

scholarly journals TINDAK TUTUR SARKASTIK DI MEDIA SOSIAL (SARCASTIC SPEECH ACTS IN SOCIAL MEDIA)

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 123
Author(s):  
Wiwin Hardiati
Keyword(s):  
Social Media ◽  
Speech Acts ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
The Political ◽  
Expressive Speech ◽  
Psychological Conditions ◽  
Cultural Themes ◽  
Directive Speech Acts ◽  
Directive Speech ◽  
Descriptive Method

AbstractSarcastic Speech Acts in Sosial Media.The research entitled sarcastic speech acts in social media ismotivated by the use of speech acts in social media that contain many sarcastic elements, in this study,there are four themes raised, namely the theme of politics, social themes, cultural themes, and economicthemes, and it based on three types of speech acts, namely directive speech acts, expressive speech acts,and assertive speech acts. This research applied the descriptive method. The sources of data obtained fromsocial media and research data are in forms of words or sentences expressed in social media. Then, thedata were collected through several techniques including classification, analysis, and conclusion. Fromthe results of data analysis, researchers can conclude that the act of sarcastic speech is very dominantin the political theme. Based on the type of speech acts of the four themes,the most frequent one toappear is expressive speech acts. Viewed from expressive speech types, the use of sarcastic speech actsis manifested in a variety of expressive ways of expressing displeasure, criticizing, swearing, mocking,insulting, disparaging, venting, and calling nicknames with discriminatory calls. The sarcastic speech actsthat unconsciously stated can have a negative impact on the psychological conditions of the opponent otthe readers and other people who are along with the utterances.Key words: speech acts, sarcastic, social mediaAbstrakTindak Tutur Sarkastik di Media Sosial. Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh penggunaan tindak tuturdi media sosial yang banyak mengadung unsur sarkastik, dalam penelian ini ada empat tema yangdiangkat, yaitu tema politik, tema sosial, tema budaya, dan tema ekonomi kemudian berdasarkan daritiga jenis tindak tutur, yaitu tindak tutur direktif, tindak tutur ekspresif, dan tindak tutur asertif. Penelitianini menggunakan metode deskriftif. Sumber data didapat dari media sosial dan data penelitian ini ialahkata-kata atau kalimat yang terdapat di media sosial kemudian dikumpulkan melalui beberapa teknik,diklasifikasi, dianalisis, dan disimpulkan. Berdasarkan hasil analisis data, dapat peneliti simpulkanbahwa tindak tutur sarkastik yang sangat dominan terdapat pada tema politik, sedangkan berdasarkanjenis tindak tutur dari empat tema tersebut yang dominan muncul, yaitu tindak tutur ekspresif. Jikaditinjau dari jenis tuturan ekspresif, penggunaan tindak tutur sarkastik diwujudkan dalam berbagaijenis tindak ekspresif, yaitu mengungkapkan rasa tidak senang, mengkritik, umpatan, ejekan, hinaan,meremehkan, meluapkan, dan memanggil nama panggilan dengan panggilan yang diskriminatif.Sementara itu, jika ditinjau dari fungsi dan maknanya, penggunaan tindak tutur ekspresif mempunyaipotensi yang dapat menimbulkan dampak penggunaan..Kata-kata kunci: tindak tutur, sarkastik, media sosial

Online hate propaganda during election period: The case of Macedonia

2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 309-334
Author(s):  
Zorica Trajkova ◽  
Silvana Neshkovska
Keyword(s):  
Social Media ◽  
Speech Acts ◽  
Political Discourse ◽  
Political Context ◽  
Expressive Speech ◽  
Rhetorical Figures ◽  
Pragmatic Analysis ◽  
Linguistic Strategies ◽  
The One ◽  
The Given

Abstract The paper offers a critical discursive and pragmatic analysis of a corpus of hateful Facebook and Twitters status updates of politicians, political activists and voters in the 2016 pre-and-post election period, in Macedonia. Aiming to determine how power is exerted on social media, the paper focuses on identifying the stance social media users take when posting messages with political content. The analysis first attempted to unveil what speech acts the hateful posts are predominantly composed of (e.g. assertive, directives, expressives), what roles the authors of the posts normally assume, who the hateful political discourse in the given socio-political context is directed to, as well as what are some of the predominant linguistic strategies underlying the analysed hateful comments. The results show that, by using mostly assertive and expressive speech acts, social media users assume mainly the roles of analysts and judges and only subsequently the one of activists, they mostly address politicians directly and they use a lot of negative lexis, rhetorical figures and boosters as interpersonal metadiscourse markers to express their negative stance and exert power and dominance.

Fake It “Till You Make It”: Debunking Fake News in a Post-Truth America

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 114-133
Keyword(s):  
Social Media ◽  
First Amendment ◽  
Presidential Election ◽  
Political Discourse ◽  
Cutting Edge ◽  
American People ◽  
Fake News ◽  
News Sources ◽  
The Media ◽  
The U.S

Since the 2016 U.S. presidential election, attacks on the media have been relentless. “Fake news” has become a household term, and repeated attempts to break the trust between reporters and the American people have threatened the validity of the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. In this article, the authors trace the development of fake news and its impact on contemporary political discourse. They also outline cutting-edge pedagogies designed to assist students in critically evaluating the veracity of various news sources and social media sites.

scholarly journals Speech Acts in the Facebook Status Updates Posted by an Apostate

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Azweed Mohamad ◽  
Radzuwan Ab Rashid ◽  
Kamariah Yunus ◽  
Shireena Basree Abdul Rahman ◽  
Saadiyah Darus ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Social Media ◽  
Data Collection ◽  
Speech Acts ◽  
Speech Act ◽  
Expressive Speech ◽  
Social Actions ◽  
The Social ◽  
Data Collection Period ◽  
Collection Period ◽  
Made In

This paper discusses the speech acts in Facebook Status Updates posted by an apostate of Islam. The Facebook Timeline was observed for a duration of two years (January 2015 to December 2016). More than 4000 postings were made in the data collection period. However, only 648 postings are related to apostasy. The data were classified according to the types of speech acts. Expressive speech act is the most frequent speech act (33%, n=215), followed by the directive (27%, n=177), assertive (22%, n=141), and commissive (18%, n=115), respectively. Based on the speech acts used, it is discernible that the apostate attempts to engage other Facebook users and persuade them into accepting her ideology while gaining their support. This paper is novel in the sense that it puts forth the social actions of an apostate which is very scarce in literature. It is also methodologically innovative as it uses social media postings as a tool to explore the apostate’s social actions in an online space.

scholarly journals KEKERASAN VERBAL DALAM FILM KARTUN KIKO(VERBAL VIOLENCE IN THE KIKO CARTOON FILM)

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 99
Author(s):  
Ika Anggraeni Ratna Sari
Keyword(s):  
Speech Acts ◽  
Note Taking ◽  
Research Instrument ◽  
Expressive Speech ◽  
Data Source ◽  
Verbal Violence ◽  
Directive Speech Acts ◽  
Video Player ◽  
Directive Speech

Verbal Violence in the Kiko Cartoon Film. This research aims to describe theverbal violence in the forms of the directive, and expressive speech acts in the Kikocartoon. This was qualititative research. The data were the words or sentencesused in the Kiko cartoon. The data source of research was the cartoon film of Kiko.Data were collected using the note-taking technique. The research instrument usedwere laptop and data cards. Laptop and data cards are used as a video player andas a tool to listen and understand the utterances in the Kiko cartoon. Furthermore,the data collected were analyzed based on verbal violence in the forms of thedirective, and expressive speech acts. The additional instrument was the data cardsby which the researcher collected data on the types off speech acts and groupedthem according to the directive and expressive speech acts and grouped themaccording to the directive and expressive speech acts. The results of the researchindicated that 117 speech acts including 33 types of rebuked violence, 55 types ofharassment, two types of accusations, 20 types of coercion, and seven types ofintimidation. b) 56 directive speech acts consisting of 29 commandment speechacts, 2 threat, seven rejection seepch acts, 13 opposing speech acts, five denialspeech acts. c) 61 expressive speech acts consisting of 11 speech acts forexpressing displeasure, 17 speech acts for criticizing, 15 speech acts for swearing,15 speech acts for insulting, and there speech acts for exspressing satire.Key words:verbal violence, Kiko cartoon film

scholarly journals Perang Tagar Di Ruang Virtual Diskursus Politik Capres Pasca Debat Putaran Kedua

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 30
Author(s):  
Ana Fitriana P ◽  
Ema Ema ◽  
Fardiah Oktariani Lubis
Keyword(s):  
Social Media ◽  
Critical Discourse Analysis ◽  
Presidential Election ◽  
Political Discourse ◽  
Virtual Space ◽  
The Political ◽  
Virtual Communication ◽  
Presidential Candidates ◽  
Subject Pronouns ◽  
Source Of Information

This study aims to uncover the political discourse of the Presidential Candidates after the second round of debates, Jokowi VS Prabowo in virtual space. The background of the political discourse of the 2019 Presidential Election debate in the virtual space gave rise to various responses and sentiments among the supporters. After the Presidential Election debate, the hashtag war between #BohongLagiJokowi and # 02GagapUnicorn on social media Twitter became the main discussion. The aim is to disperse the power, ideology, and interests behind the presidential political discourse through the Fairclough Critical Discourse Analysis. The research method uses qualitative methods to parse the problem in research, using critical thinking as a basis for research. The results showed the tweet of Prabowo supporters trying to show stunts through language. The use of subject pronouns such as the word Mukidi to dwarf the subject, also uses the hashtags #DeletJokowi, #UnistallJokowi, and #BohongLagiJokowi as symbols of virtual communication. In contrast, the tweet of Jokowi's supporters sent a stuttering sentiment because they didn't understand the e-comer business. Hashtag # 02GagapUnicorn as a virtual symbol for organizing texts. In the order of messo or the production of text, the two supporters make a virtual symbol through the hashtag to become a topic of discussion on Twitter. In the situational or macro aspects are influenced by the post-truth phenomenon that is vague information whose source is unclear, have an impact on the inclusion of opinions on the assassination of certain characters. The advice, wise social media, understand and thoroughly source of information, is not affected by the use of certain metaphors, and at the stage of text, production needs to pay attention to the effects that will impact on the influence of social psychology of each supporter.Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengungkap diskursus politik Capres pasca debat putaran kedua, Jokowi VS Prabowo di ruang virtual. Dilatarbelakangi oleh lanskap diskursus politik debat Pilpres 2019 di ruang virtual yang menimbulkan berbagai tanggapan dan sentimen di antara kedua kubu pendukung. Pasca debat Pilpres perang tagar antara #BohongLagiJokowi dan #02GagapUnicorn di Twitter menjadi pembahasan utama. Tujuannya untuk membongkar kuasa, ideologi dan kepentingan di balik wacana politik Pilpres melalui analisis wacana kritis Fairclough. Metode penelitian menggunakan metode kualitatif untuk mengurai masalah dalam penelitian, dengan menggunakan pemikiran kritis sebagai dasar pijakan penelitian. Hasil penelitian menunjukan tweet warganet pendukung Prabowo berusaha menunjukkan pengkerdilan melalui Bahasa. Penggunaan kata ganti subjek seperti kata Mukidi untuk mengkerdilkan subjek, juga menggunakan tagar #DeletJokowi, #UninstallJokowi dan #BohongLagiJokowi sebagai simbol komunikasi virtual. Namun sebaliknya, tweet warganet pendukung Jokowi membuat sentimen dengan kata-kata gagap karena tidak memahami bisnis milenial (e-commerce). Tagar #02GagapUnicorn sebagai simbol virtual untuk pengorganisasin teks, sedangkan di tahapan produksi teks (messo) kedua pendukung membuat simbol virtual melalui tagar (#) untuk menjadi tren topik pembahasan di Twitter. Pada aspek situasional (makro) dipengaruhi oleh fenomena post-truth yaitu informasi-informasi samar yang tidak jelas sumbernya, berdampak terhadap penggiringan opini terhadap pembunuhan karakter tertentu. Sarannya, bijak bermedia sosial, pahami dan teliti sumber informasinya, tidak terpengaruh terhadap penggunaaan metafora tertentu, serta pada tahap produksi teks perlu memperhatikan efeknya yang akan berdampak pada pengaruh psikologi sosial masing-masing pendukung. 

scholarly journals Accurate, Fast, But Not Always Cheap: Evaluating “Crowdcoding” as an Alternative Approach to Analyze Social Media Data

2019 ◽  
Vol 97 (3) ◽  
pp. 811-834 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Guo ◽  
Kate Mays ◽  
Sha Lai ◽  
Mona Jalal ◽  
Prakash Ishwar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Social Media ◽  
Presidential Election ◽  
Mass Communication ◽  
The Internet ◽  
Communication Research ◽  
Social Media Data ◽  
Quantitative Content ◽  
Alternative Approach ◽  
Media Data ◽  
Numerous People

Crowdcoding, a method that outsources “coding” tasks to numerous people on the internet, has emerged as a popular approach for annotating texts and visuals. However, the performance of this approach for analyzing social media data in the context of journalism and mass communication research has not been systematically assessed. This study evaluated the validity and efficiency of crowdcoding based on the analysis of 4,000 tweets about the 2016 U.S. presidential election. The results show that compared with the traditional quantitative content analysis, crowdcoding yielded comparably valid results and was superior in efficiency, but was more expensive under most circumstances.

scholarly journals Don’t Republicans Tweet Too? Using Twitter to Assess the Consequences of Political Endorsements by Celebrities

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 144-160
Author(s):  
Jan Zilinsky ◽  
Cristian Vaccari ◽  
Jonathan Nagler ◽  
Joshua A. Tucker
Keyword(s):  
Social Media ◽  
Presidential Election ◽  
Presidential Candidate ◽  
Hillary Clinton ◽  
Donald Trump ◽  
Presidential Candidates ◽  
Political Preferences ◽  
The Social ◽  
Decision To Stay ◽  
Presidential Election Campaign

Michael Jordan supposedly justified his decision to stay out of politics by noting that Republicans buy sneakers too. In the social media era, the name of the game for celebrities is engagement with fans. So why then do celebrities risk talking about politics on social media, which is likely to antagonize a portion of their fan base? With this question in mind, we analyze approximately 220,000 tweets from 83 celebrities who chose to endorse a presidential candidate in the 2016 U.S. presidential election campaign to assess whether there is a cost—defined in terms of engagement on Twitter—for celebrities who discuss presidential candidates. We also examine whether celebrities behave similarly to other campaign surrogates in being more likely to take on the “attack dog” role by going negative more often than going positive. More specifically, we document how often celebrities of distinct political preferences tweet about Donald Trump, Bernie Sanders, and Hillary Clinton, and we show that followers of opinionated celebrities do not withhold engagement when entertainers become politically mobilized and do indeed often go negative. Interestingly, in some cases political content from celebrities actually turns out to be more popular than typical lifestyle tweets.

Simultaneous elections will weaken Indonesia’s parties

2018 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Social Media ◽  
Presidential Election ◽  
Presidential Candidate ◽  
Election Campaigns ◽  
Economic Nationalism ◽  
Content Type

Significance The legislative poll will occur alongside the presidential one on April 17, 2019, and parties have been forced to commit already to a presidential candidate. Impacts President Joko ‘Jokowi’ Widodo is likely to retain power next year. Both Jokowi and Prabowo Subianto will appeal to economic nationalism in campaigning for the presidency. Social media will feature heavily in both the legislative and the presidential election campaigns.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document