scholarly journals Computer model of accounting of the scientific activity of the education system

2019 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Computer Model ◽  
Education System ◽  
Scientific Information ◽  
Scientific Activity ◽  
Role Definition ◽  
Additional Information ◽  
Functional Capabilities ◽  
Database Administrator ◽  
Software Modules

The work is devoted to the review and analysis of resources of scientific information, the study of the possibilities of developing additional information arrays based on existing sources of scientific and scientometric information. As part of the work, approaches are proposed for storing scientometric information, methods for obtaining data, which will optimize the time of working with information and attract less resources for the implementation of work on the search for scientific information and its subsequent processing. The result of the work is a computer model that provides the ability to store scientific information in the database, as well as the use of various functions as a database administrator and user rights through the developed client C ++. The offered model of accounting for scientific activity has the following functional capabilities of software modules: introduction of new and removal of outdated information into a database; submitting information based on some criteria. The architecture of a computer model consists of such software modules as the user role definition module, the database administrator module, and the user module. The model works with information arrays, which are formed on the basis of resources and contain bibliometric and scientometric information and can act as parameters that be able to influence decision making and expand the range of possible cooperation of scientists. The application of the developed computer model allows organizing a flexible search for scientific information in the field of education.

scholarly journals Computer model of accounting of the scientific activity of the education system

2019 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Computer Model ◽  
Education System ◽  
Scientific Information ◽  
Scientific Activity ◽  
Role Definition ◽  
Additional Information ◽  
Functional Capabilities ◽  
Database Administrator ◽  
Software Modules

The work is devoted to the review and analysis of resources of scientific information, the study of the possibilities of developing additional information arrays based on existing sources of scientific and scientometric information. As part of the work, approaches are proposed for storing scientometric information, methods for obtaining data, which will optimize the time of working with information and attract less resources for the implementation of work on the search for scientific information and its subsequent processing. The result of the work is a computer model that provides the ability to store scientific information in the database, as well as the use of various functions as a database administrator and user rights through the developed client C ++. The offered model of accounting for scientific activity has the following functional capabilities of software modules: introduction of new and removal of outdated information into a database; submitting information based on some criteria. The architecture of a computer model consists of such software modules as the user role definition module, the database administrator module, and the user module. The model works with information arrays, which are formed on the basis of resources and contain bibliometric and scientometric information and can act as parameters that be able to influence decision making and expand the range of possible cooperation of scientists. The application of the developed computer model allows organizing a flexible search for scientific information in the field of education.

FORBEEF: A forage-livestock system computer model used as a teaching aid for decision making

1987 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 85-87
Author(s):  
W. C. Stringer ◽  
N. S. Hill ◽  
B. W. Pinkerton
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Computer Model ◽  
Teaching Aid ◽  
Livestock System

An Analysis of the Demand for Reporting on Internal Control

2000 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 325-341 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather M. Hermanson
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Internal Control ◽  
Operational Definition ◽  
Financial Statement ◽  
Individual Investors ◽  
Internal Auditors ◽  
Additional Information ◽  
User Groups ◽  
Definition Of

The purpose of this study is to analyze the demand for reporting on internal control. Nine financial statement user groups were identified and surveyed to determine whether they agree that: (1) management reports on internal control (MRIC) are useful, (2) MRICs influence decisions, and (3) financial reporting is improved by adding MRICs. In addition, the paper examined whether responses varied based on: (1) the definition of internal control used (manipulated as broad, operational definition vs. narrow, financial-reporting definition) and (2) user group. The results indicate that financial statement users agree that internal controls are important. Respondents agreed that voluntary MRICs improved controls and provided additional information for decision making. Respondents also agreed that mandatory MRICs improved controls, but did not agree about their value for decision making. Using a broad definition of controls, respondents strongly agreed that MRICs improved controls and provided a better indicator of a company's long-term viability. Executive respondents were less likely to agree about the value of MRICs than individual investors and internal auditors.

scholarly journals Methodological adequacy of articles published in two open-access Brazilian cardiology periodicals

2010 ◽  
Vol 128 (2) ◽  
pp. 85-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristiane Rufino Macedo ◽  
Davi Leite da Silva ◽  
Maria Eduarda Puga
Keyword(s):  
Web Of Science ◽  
Scientific Information ◽  
Quality Standards ◽  
Scientific Activity ◽  
Electronic Library ◽  
Scientific Methods ◽  
Assessment Performance ◽  
Performance Results ◽  
Study Designs ◽  
The Impact

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: The use of rigorous scientific methods has contributed towards developing scientific articles of excellent methodological quality. This has made it possible to promote their citation and increase the impact factor. Brazilian periodicals have had to adapt to certain quality standards demanded by these indexing organizations, such as the content and the number of original articles published in each issue. This study aimed to evaluate the methodological adequacy of two Brazilian periodicals within the field of cardiology that are indexed in several databases and freely accessible through the Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), and which are now indexed by the Web of Science (Institute for Scientific Information, ISI). DESIGN AND SETTING: Descriptive study at Brazilian Cochrane Center. METHODS: All the published articles were evaluated according to merit assessment (content) and form assessment (performance). RESULTS: Ninety-six percent of the articles analyzed presented study designs that were adequate for answering the objectives. CONCLUSIONS: These two Brazilian periodicals within the field of cardiology published methodologically adequate articles, since they followed the quality standards. Thus, these periodicals can be considered both for consultation and as vehicles for publishing future articles. For further analyses, it is essential to apply other indicators of scientific activity such as bibliometrics, which evaluates quantitative aspects of the production, dissemination and use of information, and scientometrics, which is also concerned with the development of science policies, within which it is often superimposed on bibliometrics.

scholarly journals Distribution of birds in Colombia

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danny Vélez ◽  
Edwin Tamayo ◽  
Fernando Ayerbe-Quiñones ◽  
Julián Torres ◽  
Juan Rey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Species Richness ◽  
Land Use Planning ◽  
Scientific Information ◽  
Sustainable Use ◽  
Bird Species ◽  
Geographic Information ◽  
Huge Number ◽  
Bird Species Richness ◽  
Taxonomic Groups

1. Colombia with 1941 known recorded bird species is one of the most species rich countries in the world. Efforts are necessary to conserve, study and promote sustainable use of this important taxonomic group throughout Colombia’s vast territory. 2. In an ideal world, informed decisions that are based on sound scientific information should be likelier to have successful outcomes. Nevertheless, there are barriers that make it difficult to access and use information in a timely fashion. Those same barriers impede the study, conservation and sustainable use of bird species in Colombia. On the other hand, given that there is good documentation about the ecology of a large number of species, information about the distribution of birds can be easily incorporated into decision-making processes, once this information becomes readily available in a consumable format using Geographic Information Sciences tools. 3. In this context, the main objective of this paper is to present the first compilation of the current distribution of 1889 (97%) species of birds in Colombia, using expert criteria. The shapefiles were used to show the distribution and diversity of bird species in Colombia under both geopolitical and conservation geographic units. 4. The information provided in this paper can be used as a baseline for a huge number of initiatives that aim to strengthen conservation efforts and improve knowledge about one the most unique taxonomic groups in the country. These range from land use planning strategies at the municipal or department scale to sustainable use of bird species - such as those initiatives related to bird watching - in Colombia. This study has considered three key aspects: 1) the importance of birds for Colombia’s ecosystems, 2) the privileged place of Colombia in bird species richness and 3) the importance of data mobilisation in formats easily consumable by Geographic Information Systems (GIS) to facilitate the processes of informed decision-making. We present the first compilation - in shapefile format - for 1889 of the 1941 bird species recorded from Colombia. Using this novel collection, we showed the species richness of birds in Colombia’s 33 Departments plus its Captial District (DPs), 1122 Municipalities (MNs), 58 protected areas (PAs), 39 Regional Autonomous Corporations (the authorities responsible within their respective jurisdictions for regulating the environment and renewable natural resources in Colombia; CARs) and 916 Collectively Titled Territories (including both indigenous reservations and afro-descendant communities; CTTs). In addition, we provide a list of known bird species richness for the above geographic units found in the available literature. The information provided here can be used as a baseline for a huge number of initiatives concerning the study, conservation and sustainable use of bird species present in Colombia, providing access to key features of bird distribution that should facilitate decision-making.

Some reasons why evidence from educational research is not particularly popular among (pre-service) teachers: A discussion

2021 ◽  
Vol 35 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 209-214
Author(s):  
Frank Fischer
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Teacher Education ◽  
Problem Solving ◽  
Educational Research ◽  
Information Sources ◽  
Research Evidence ◽  
Scientific Evidence ◽  
Scientific Information ◽  
Special Issue ◽  
The Individual

Abstract. This discussion first highlights novel aspects that the individual articles contribute to the special issue on (future) teachers' choice, use, and evaluation of (non-)scientific information sources about educational topics. Among these highlights are the conceptualizations of epistemic goals and the type of pedagogical task as moderators of the selection and use of scientific evidence. The second part raises overarching questions, including the following: How inclusive do we want the concept of evidence to be? How should teachers use research evidence in their pedagogical problem-solving and decision-making? To what extent is multidisciplinary teacher education contributing to epistemological confusion, possibly leading to (pre-service) teachers' low appreciation of educational research?

Getting It Wrong Most of The Time: Comparing Trialists’ Choice of Primary Outcome With What Patients And Health Professionals Want

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaun Treweek ◽  
Viviane Miyakoda ◽  
Dylan Burke ◽  
Frances Shiely
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Additional Information ◽  
Cancer Management ◽  
Breast Cancer Management ◽  
Secondary Outcomes

Abstract Background: Randomised trials support improved decision-making through the data they collect. One important piece of data is the primary outcome – so called because it is what the investigators decide is the most important. Secondary outcomes provide additional information to support decision-making. We were interested in knowing how important patients and healthcare professionals consider the outcomes (especially the primary outcome) measured in a selection of published trials. Methods: The work had three stages: 1. We identified a body of late-stage trials in two clinical areas, breast cancer management and nephrology. 2. We identified the primary and secondary outcomes for these trials. 3. We randomly ordered these outcomes and presented them to patients and healthcare professionals (with experience of the clinical area), and we asked them to rank the importance of the outcomes. They were not told which outcomes trial authors considered primary and secondary. Results: In our sample of 44 trials with 46 primary outcomes, 29 patients, one patient representative and 12 healthcare professionals together ranked the primary outcome as the most important outcome 13/46 times, or 30%. Breast cancer patients and health care professionals considered the primary outcome to be the most important outcome for 8/21 primary outcomes chosen by trialists. For nephrology, the equivalent figure was 5/25. The primary outcome appeared in a respondent’s top 5 ranked outcomes 151/178 (85%) times for breast cancer and 225/259 (87%) times for nephrology even if the primary wasn’t considered the most important outcome. Conclusions: The primary outcome in a trial is the most important piece of data collected. It is used to determine how many participants are required, and it is the main piece of information used to judge whether the intervention is effective or not. Our study found that in the view of patients and healthcare professionals, teams doing trials in breast cancer management and nephrology got their choice of primary outcome wrong 70% of the time.

Central Language Hypothesis in the Decision-Making Process

2016 ◽  
pp. 66-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Duygu Buğa
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Theoretical Framework ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Limbic Cortex ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Discussion Section ◽  
Research Directions ◽  
Additional Information ◽  
Future Research Directions ◽  
The Brain

The purpose of this chapter is to explore the potential connection between neuroeconomics and the Central Language Hypothesis (CLH) which refers to the language placed within the subconscious mind of an individual. The CLH forwards that in the brains of bilingual and multilingual people, one language is more suppressive as it dominates reflexes, emotions, and senses. This central language (CL) is located at the centre of the limbic cortex of the brain. Therefore, when there is a stimulus on the limbic cortex (e.g., fear, anxiety, sadness), the brain produces the central language. The chapter begins with an Introduction followed by a Theoretical Framework. The next section discusses the neurolinguistic projection of the central language and includes the survey and the results used in this study. The Discussion section provides additional information regarding the questionnaire and the CLH, followed by Future Research Directions, Implications, and finally the Conclusion.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document