scholarly journals Predictive Ligament Balancing in Robotic TKA – One Year Clinical Outcomes from a Multicenter Study

10.29007/mkj3 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Keggi ◽  
Jeffrey Lawrence ◽  
Amber Randall ◽  
Jeffrey DeClaire ◽  
Corey Ponder ◽  
...  

This study reports on the one-year clinical results and patient reported outcomes (PROMs) associated with a new ‘predictive balance’ tibia-cut first total knee arthroplasty (TKA) technique that uses a robotic ligament tensioner. PROMs are compared to registry data and historical results in the literature.Five hundred and thirty-three patients were prospectively enrolled and underwent robotic TKA (mean age: 67.7±8.4; females: 320; BMI: 31.2±4.9). Pre-op, three, six and 12-month WOMAC, UCLA activity scale, and HSS-Patient satisfaction assessments were completed by 533, 352, 314, and 256 patients, respectively, and compared to WOMAC registry data from the Shared Ortech Aggregated Repository (SOAR) and to historical satisfaction reports in the literature.Despite having equivalent baseline PROM scores, predictive balance patients had significantly higher WOMAC scores at all post-operative timepoints (p<0.001) and higher UCLA activity scale scores at 3M and 6M (p<0.013). Overall patient satisfaction in the predictive balance cohort was 91.2%, 92.4%, and 96.5% at 3M, 6M and 1YR, respectively. Average length of stay was 1.6 days (±0.8). Surgical complications in this cohort were typical of TKA.Limitations to this study include the lack of a closely matched control group. Nonetheless, first year results are promising with improved objective measures compared to large registry databases and recently reported patient satisfaction measures.

SICOT-J ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 28
Author(s):  
Surya Gandham ◽  
Abdurrahman Islim ◽  
Saud Alhamad ◽  
Sathya Thambiraj

Background: Painful vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) in myeloma patients severely reduce quality of life. Currently, the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) and National Institute of Clinical Excellence NICE advocate the use of either balloon kyphoplasty or vertebroplasty in the management of these fractures. Methods: All patients with VCFs and myeloma who adhered to the IMWG indications for vertebral augmentation were treated with the Osseofix® implant. Visual analogue scores (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) were taken preoperatively and at least one year following surgery. Cobb angle and implant migration were measured on lateral standing radiographs. Results: Sixteen patients (average age 62, SD = 11.6) consisting of 82 levels (range 3–8) were stabilised with no perioperative complications or revisions at one year. There was an improvement in patient-reported outcomes with the median preoperative VAS of 8.6 (IQR 7.3–10.0) reducing to 3 (IQR 1.0–4.0) after one year (P < 0.001) whilst an average improvement of 31.4 (SD = 19.6) points in the ODI scores was reported (P < 0.001). There was no significant collapse or implant failure at one year with a greater improvement in the VAS/ODI score, when more implants were used (P = 0.049 and 0.008, respectively). The average length of stay was 2.2 days (SD = 1.7). Conclusion: The use of the Osseofix® implant in VCFs caused by multiple myeloma has shown a statistically significant improvement in both pain and outcome scores. There were no complications or significant radiological deterioration of spinal alignment over the course of a year.


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473011418S0048
Author(s):  
Kar Teoh ◽  
Kartik Hariharan

Category: Hindfoot Introduction/Purpose: A calcaneal osteotomy can be used to treat a variety of pathologic entities in which the hindfoot needs realignment. Minimally invasive calcaneal osteotomy (MICO) is becoming increasingly popular due to being soft tissue friendly, its ability to place other incisions nearby and high union rate. Previous studies have look specifically at medialising MICO or comparing open calcaneal osteotomy versus MICO. The purpose of our study was to compare 3 different types of commonly used MICO in our centre. Methods: Sixty-two MICO which fit the criteria were included in this study. They were performed in our unit from 2010 and 2016 and all patients had at least one year follow up data. The type of osteotomies was as follows: Medialising, n = 34, Lateralising, n =15 and Zadek (Dorsal closing wedge), n =13. Clinical and radiographic data were recorded. The diagnosis for 31/34 of the medialising MICO was Stage 2 PTTD, the diagnosis for 12/15 of the lateralising MICO was cavus foot, while the diagnosis for all Zadek MICO was for insertional Achilles tendinopathy. Apart from the Zadek MICO, the other MICO were all associated with other procedures. The average age (years) were as follows: Medialising, 58 (30 – 74); Lateralising, 33 (14 – 67) and Zadek, 47 (42-62). Results: The average calcaneal displacement was 10.2 (range: 8 – 12) mm for medialising MICO, and 6.6 (4 – 8) mm for lateralising MICO(p=0.021). Average time to union was 7.8 (5.4 – 11.6) weeks for medialising MICO, 6.2 (4.6 to 7.9) weeks for lateralising MICO, and 6.1 (4.1 – 7.6) weeks for Zadek MICO. All the MICO healed radiologically and clinically. Five (8%) patients (Medialising, n = 2; Lateralising n =2; Zadek, n =1) reported transient sural nerve paraesthesia following surgery. Wound problems developed in 5 patients (Lateralising, n =3; Zadek, n =2). The number of total complications were as follow: Medialising, n = 5, Lateralising, n = 7 and Zadek, n =5. Average length of stay was as follows: Medialising, 2(0-8) days; Lateralising, 1(0-3) day and Zadek, 1(0-3) day. Conclusion: Minimally invasive calcaneal osteotomy was safe with a high union rate and low complication rates and length of stay across all 3 common osteotomies. The average calcaneal displacement was significantly less for lateralising than medialising which is similar to reported figures for open osteotomy. Wound problems were more likely for lateralising and Zadek MICO compared to medialising and this could be because of how the osteotomies are shifted.


1962 ◽  
Vol 108 (452) ◽  
pp. 59-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Barr ◽  
D. Golding ◽  
R. W. Parnell

The statistics on mental hospitals published by the Ministry of Health (1957) show that the average length of stay for admissions to mental hospitals decreased in the period 1952–1956. According to the Registrar-General's Mental Health Supplement (1961) there was an average saving, between 1951 and 1958, of sixteen days for men and thirteen days for women, among patients staying less than one year. But these figures for stay only relate to the patients discharged each year, irrespective of the year of their admission, and furthermore we do not know what happens to particular groups such, for example, as schizophrenics. Although remarkable changes are occurring at the present time, study of them is hampered by lack of appropriate and up-to-date information.


1994 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 95-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Céline Mercier ◽  
Claude Renaud ◽  
Suzanne King

This study examines the effects of deinstitutionalization policies on psychiatric hospitalization rates over a thirty-year period. It is based on a retrospective study of successive hospitalizations in severely disabled patients. The data indicate that in any five-year period these patients still spend over 20% of their time in hospital. For patients who have stayed for a total of more than one year every five years in hospital, the average length of stay has been decreasing far less rapidly in the last fifteen years than it had previously. Patients who were first admitted after 1971 spent proportionally as much time in hospital as those whose first stay was earlier. These results show that the groups primarily affected by deinstitutionalization are those who were first hospitalized prior to the 1970s and those who are the heaviest hospital users. However, the data from the patients admitted since the seventies seem to reveal that the process of change may have reached its limits.


2001 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 139-148
Author(s):  
C. Lucioni ◽  
I. Currado ◽  
M. Langer ◽  
S. Mazzi

The aim of this study is to evaluate additional hospitalisation costs and intangible costs (mortality) in patients with sepsis (intended as severe sepsis or sepsis shock) in Italy. The evaluation is based on clinical data from the Italian Sepsis Study, a prospective, multicentre study conducted in 99 Intensive Care Units (ICUs)located across Italy. Each ICU enrolled the first two (or three) patients admitted each month, during the year April 1993 to March 1994. In particular, data collected included the Average Length Of Stay (ALOS) in ICU and later in the regular ward, and the mortality within four weeks and in hospital. Out of the 2,946 patients enrolled, 2,641 never developed sepsis and were considered as the control group (comparability was confirmed based on gender, age, and comorbidity). The additional (respective to the control group) ALOSs of the patients with sepsis were valued in monetary terms using per diem full costs, inflated to 2000: 1,033.43 Euro for l day in ICU (published data) and 299.54 Euro for l day in the regular ward (estimated data based on published materials). Statistical significance was tested with Student t test. The hospitalisation cost of a patient with sepsis (21,571.88 Euro) is significantly higher (+86%) than that patient without sepsis (11,590.84 Euro), due to a longer (+ 163%) stay in the expensive ICU, not balanced by shorter stay in the regular ward. Also intangible costs are significantly higher: the risk for an ICU patient with sepsis to die in hospital is 3 times higher than that of an ICU patient without sepsis. In particular, those patients developing sepsis after admission are more costly and with a higher mortality risk.


Author(s):  
Grace Siama Juwita ◽  
Lenie Marlinae ◽  
Fauzie Rahman

Abstrak Rumah Sakit Umum Daerah (RSUD) Tamiang Layang merupakan rumah sakit umummilik Pemerintah Daerah Barito Selatan. Data Bed Occupation Rate (BOR), Average Length Of Stay (ALOS), dan Bed Turn Over (BTO) pada tahun 2013-2014 mengalami penurunan yang artinya bahwa mutu pelayanan di rumah sakit juga semakin menurun. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menjelaskan hubungan mutu pelayanan pasien rawat inap dengan kepuasan pasien RSUD Tamiang Layang. Rancangan penelitian menggunakan cross sectionaldengan jumlah sampel 52 responden menggunakan metodeproportionalrandom sampling.Instrumen yang digunakan berupa kuesioner dan data dianalisis menggunakan uji Chi Square. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat hubungan antara mutu pelayanan dalam dimensi kehandalan (reliability), jaminan (assurance), bukti langsung(tangible), empati (empathy)dan daya tanggap (responsiveness)dengan kepuasan kerja dengan masing-masing p-value 0,000. Diharapkan agar pihak RSUD Tamiyang Layang dapat meningkatkan mutu pelayanansehingga kepuasan pasien terhadap mutu pelayanan dapat meningkat, sehingga dapat memaksimalkan kepercayaan pasien dalam memanfaatkan pelayanan kesehatan. Kata-kata kunci: Rumah sakit, mutu pelayanan, kepuasan, pasien  Abstract Regional General Hospital (Hospital) Tamiang Layang is a general hospital belonging to the Regional Government of South Barito. Data Bed Occupation Rate (BOR), Average Length Of Stay (ALOS), and Bed Turn Over (BTO) in 2013-2014 has decreased, which means that the quality of care in hospitals is also declining. The purpose of this study was to describe the relationship of quality of service inpatients with hospital patient satisfaction Tamiang Layang. Using a cross sectional study design with a sample of 52 respondents using proportional random sampling method. The instrument used was a questionnaire and the data were analyzed using chi square test. The results showed that there is a relationship between the quality of service in the dimensions of reliability (reliability), assurance (assurance), direct evidence (tangible), empathy (empathy) and responsiveness (responsiveness) and job satisfaction with each of the p-value of 0.000. It is hoped that the hospitals Tamiyang Layang can improve the quality of care that patient satisfaction with the quality of service can be increased, so as to maximize the patient's belief in the use of health services. Keywords: Hospital, quality of service, satisfaction, patient


Author(s):  
Sajad Heidari ◽  
Alireza Taabbod ◽  
Mahmoud Farzan ◽  
Sadegh Saberi ◽  
Mitra Ashrafi

Background: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common compression neuropathy in the upper limb which needs surgery in many cases. Two common surgical incisions for carpal tunnel release (CTR) are classical incision and minimal incision. In this survey, the aim is to compare patient-reported outcomes of these two types of incisions. Methods: In this retrospective study, patients with CTS who underwent two different approaches for CTR (classical or minimal) during one year were included. The diagnosis was confirmed clinically and by electrodiagnostic studies. The patients were categorized into two groups regarding the type of surgery. At the 12-month visit, the patients were assessed for functional outcome, level of the pain, and satisfaction with Quick Disability of Arm, Hand and Shoulder score (QuickDASH), the visual analogue score (VAS) scale, and the scar appearance and symptom relief, respectively. Results: 39 patients were entered in this study, 3 of who had bilateral symptoms. The 42 operated hands were divided into two groups: classical incision group (n = 21) and minimal incision group (n = 21). No significant difference was discovered between the two groups considering age and sex. In addition, no significant difference was found in the variables evaluated between the two groups, except for the higher patient satisfaction with the scar appearance in minimal incision group after 12 months. Conclusion: After a one-year period, the minimal incision procedure had no priority to classical incision procedure, except for higher patient satisfaction considering the scar appearance.


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (7_suppl5) ◽  
pp. 2325967119S0043
Author(s):  
Benjamin G. Domb ◽  
Muriel R. Battaglia ◽  
Itay Perets ◽  
Ajay C. Lall ◽  
Austin Chen ◽  
...  

Objectives: Labral reconstruction has demonstrated short-term benefit for the treatment of irreparable labral tears. Nonetheless, there is a scarcity of evidence for mid-term outcomes of this treatment. The purpose of our study was to report 5-year outcomes in patients who underwent segmental labral reconstruction. In addition, we compared 5-year outcomes of patients who underwent primary segmental labral reconstruction (PLRECON) with a matched-pair control group that underwent primary labral repair (PLREPAIR). We hypothesized that arthroscopic segmental reconstruction in the setting of irreparable labral tears would show improvement in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and high patient satisfaction at minimum 5-year follow-up. Secondly, PLRECON would experience similar improvement in PROs at minimum 5-year follow-up when compared to a matched-pair PLREPAIR control group. Methods: Data from February 2008 to April 2013 was retrospectively reviewed. Patients were included if they underwent hip arthroscopy for segmental labral reconstruction in the setting of irreparable labral tear and femoro-acetabular impingement (FAI), with minimum 5-year follow-up for modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Non-Arthritic Hip Score (NAHS), Hip Outcome Score-Sports Specific Subscale (HOS-SSS), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain. Exclusion criteria were Tönnis osteoarthritis grade >1, prior hip conditions, or Workers’ Compensation claims. PLRECON were matched in a 1:3 ratio to a PLREPAIR group based on age ±5 years, gender, and body mass index (BMI) ±5 kg/m2. Results: Twenty-eight patients were eligible for the study, of which 23 (82.14%) had minimum 5-year follow-up. We found significant improvement from preoperative to latest follow-up in all outcome measures recorded: 17.8-point increase in mHHS (P=0.002), 22-point increase in NAHS (P<0.001), 25.4-point increase in HOS-SSS (P=0.003), and a 2.9-point decrease in VAS pain ratings (P<0.001). Average patient satisfaction was 7.1 out of 10. In the nested matched-pair analysis, 17 PLRECON were matched to a control group of 51 PLREPAIR patients. PLRECON demonstrated comparable survivorship and comparable improvements in all PROs with the exception of patient satisfaction. Conclusion: Hip arthroscopy with segmental labral reconstruction resulted in significant improvement in PROs at minimum 5-year follow-up. PLRECON reached comparable functional outcomes when compared to a benchmark PLREPAIR control group, but demonstrated lower patient satisfaction at latest follow-up. [Figure: see text]


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 81-87
Author(s):  
Lailil Masruron ◽  
Tjahjono Kuntjoro ◽  
Martha Irene Kartasurya

Title :Patient Satisfaction To Doctor’s And Nurse’s Care Associated To The Interest To Be Rehospitalized (A study at RSUD Dolopo, Madiun Regency). AbstractBed Occupancy Rate (BOR) at Dolopo Public Hospital had decreased from 56.16% in 2013 to 35.86% in 2104 and 35.2% in 2015, and the average ALOS (Average Length of Stay) and Turn over Interval (TOI) increased. The preliminary study on patients of Social Security Agency (BPJS Non PBI) showed a dissatisfaction to nurse’s and doctor’s services. The aim of this study was to analyze the associations between patient satisfaction toward doctor’s & nurse’s services to the interest to be rehospitalized.This study was conducted in a cross sectional design. The subjects were 95 patients of  BPJS with Non PBI in inpatient room for class I, II, III, which was choosen by using accidental sampling. Data were gathered through interviews using structured questionnaires. Data analysis was conducted by Chi-square tests and logistic regression.Results showed that the patient satisfaction based on aspects of tangibles, reliability, responsiveness, assurance, and empathy were lower than the expectations. Most of the subjects have positive attitudes, negative subjective norms and perceptions of behavior control and had a poor accesibility to the hospital. However 75.8% of the respondents were interested to be rehospitalized at Dolopo Hospital. There were correlations between patient satisfaction (p=0.009), attitude (p=0.000), subjective norm (p=0.002) with the interest to be rehospitalized. There was no correlation between control perception behavior (p=0.103), and access (p = 0.454) with the interest to be rehospitalized. After controlled for the attitude toward doctors’ and nurses’ services, the patients who were satisfied to the doctor’ and nurses’ services had 3.84 times to be interested to be rehospitalized than the patients who were not satifsfied (OR = 3.84 ; CI 95% : 0.98-15.12, p=0.054).Keywords       : Patient Satisfaction, Rehospitalized, BPJS. 


2021 ◽  
pp. 1357633X2199957
Author(s):  
Kerstin B Palm ◽  
Philip E Blazar ◽  
James C Manna ◽  
Angela S Serig ◽  
Eric A Phillips ◽  
...  

Introduction Telemedicine is an effective, emerging interface to connect practitioners with patients. It facilitates access to healthcare expertise, reduces costs, time demands and health disparities while improving satisfaction. This pilot study evaluated the feasibility, effectiveness and patient satisfaction of telerehabilitation for thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) arthroplasty and reverse shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA). Methods This prospective investigation was performed at a single academic institution with two hand and upper extremity fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeons. All patients undergoing CMC arthroplasty or rTSA were eligible for inclusion. Telerehabilitation was delivered by a hybrid model including an in-person post-operative visit, followed by alternating in-clinic and virtual videoconference visits. All patients were offered participation in the study arm; those that preferred in-person therapy were included as a control group. Therapy was initiated two weeks post-operative with an in-clinic evaluation. Patients then participated in alternating in-clinic and virtual visits weekly for eight weeks, followed by one virtual visit at 14-weeks post-operative and one clinical visit at 16-weeks post-operative. Patient reported and functional outcomes were collected at each visit. Results In the CMC group, 19 study and 11 control patients were enrolled. In the rTSA group, five study and 14 control patients were enrolled. No statistically significant differences between telerehabilitation and control for range-of-motion, pain and patient-reported functional outcomes was noted. All patients in the telerehabilitation arms reported high satisfaction. Discussion Utilizing telehealth in rehabilitation may be a viable option in upper extremity recovery. We hope this pilot programme can be a model for development of future telerehabilitation programmes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document