ANALISIS PENGARUH GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE TERHADAP NILAI PERUSAHAAN DENGAN PROFITABILITAS SEBAGAI VARIABEL INTERVENING (Studi Empiris Pada Perusahaan Kontruksi yang Terdaftar di BEI Tahun 2014-2017)

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-16
Author(s):  
Listiyowati Listiyowati ◽  
Iin Indarti

This study aims to examine the effect of institutional ownership, independent commissioners on the value of the company with return on assets as intervening variables. The test results for a sample of 32 construction companies from 2014 to 2017 using path analysis. Institutional ownership and independent commissioners do not have a direct effect on company value and return on assets, while return on assets directly has a significant effect on the value of companies in construction companies on the IDX. While profitability is not able to mediate the effect of good corporate governance on firm value because of the Z Score under 1.98. For Square Multiple Correlation is 83.8% which indicates that the research capital framework is quite good at explaining the dependent variable.Keywords: Institutional Ownership, Independent Commissioner, Return On Assets, Company Valu

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Suwardi Bambang Hermanto ◽  
Ikhsan Budi Riharjo

The research objective was to analyze the influence of corporate governance and performance, as well as the publication of financial statements as the moderation of company value. Institutional ownership variables, number of commissioners, number of directors, and number of audit committees and independent commissioners as corporate governance. Return on asset variables as performance, and audit delay as the publication of financial statements, and Tobin's Q as a company value. The research objects were 70 public companies on the Indonesia Stock Exchange, with a sample of 122 observations of financial statements from 2013-2017. The results showed that the number of commissioners, audit committees and return on assets had a positive effect on firm value. Publication of financial statements affects the value of the company, and moderates the effect of financial performance on firm value. Whereas institutional ownership, the number of directors and independent commissioners does not affect


2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 142
Author(s):  
Victor Jonathan Mahubessy

This research was conducted with the aim of proving the effect of Good Corporate Governance, demonstrated by managerial ownership, institutional ownership, independent board of commissioners and audit committee as well as potential bankruptcy on Firm value. The population used by mining companies on the IDX in 2017 - 2019 was 15 companies observed after random sampling. The data analysis technique used is regression analysis. The results of this study provide evidence that the independent commissioner, potential bankruptcy, and audit committee have a significant effect on Firm value, while managerial ownership and institutional ownership have no significant effect on Firm value. Keywords : Company Value; Corporate Governance; Bankruptcy Potential.


2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 153-166
Author(s):  
Pristiwantiyasih Pristiwantiyasih

This study aims to determine the effect of tax planning, board diversity and good corporate governance simultaneously on the value of the consumer goods sub-sector manufacturing companies listed on the IDX 2016-2018. The sampling technique was using purposive sampling technique. From the partial test results or the t test, from the test results the Tax Planning variable has an influence on Firm Value, because from the results of the t test the calculated t value of the Tax Planning variable is greater than the t table value and the significant value is less than 0.05. While the Board Diversity (DW) variable and the Institutional Ownership variable have no influence on the Firm Value variable, from the test results of these two variables the calculated t value is smaller than the t table value and the significance value is greater than 0.05. The Adjusted R Square value is 0.575. This means that 57.5% of the firm value variable can be explained by tax planning, female directors and institutional ownership. While the remaining 42.5% can be explained by other factors outside the independent variable.


2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-44
Author(s):  
Listiyowati Listiyowati ◽  
Wenny Ana Adnanti ◽  
Iin Indarti

This study aimed to examine the effect of institutional ownership, independent commissioner and holding company on return on assets. The test results on a sample of 40 construction companies from 2014 to 2017 using regression analysis. Institutional ownership and independent commissioners had no effect on return on assets, while holding company had a significant effect on returns on assets in construction companies in IDX. When simultaneous testing of the three independent variables above had a significant effect on the dependent variable. The coefficient of determination is 16.2% which shows that the researchd capital framework is not good enough to explain the dependent variable.


2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-39
Author(s):  
Achmad Tjahjono ◽  
Siti Chaeriyah

The Company was founded with the goal of increasing the value of the company as well as to provide prosperity for the owners or shareholders. Good Corporate Governance and profitability is an effort to enhance company value. This study aims to determine the influence of good corporate governance to company value with profitability as intervening variable. The population of this research is manufacturing companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2010 - 2014. The sample is taken by using purposive sampling method. Under this method, as many as 123 companies were obtained. The analysis tool to test the hypothesis is path analysis with AMOS software version 21. Data analysis method is descriptive analysis, path analysis, and sobeltest. The results of this study indicate that managerial ownership, the audit committee and the profitability have positive impact toward the of the company value, institutional ownership has positive impact but not significant, non-executive director with negative effect tendency on the company value. The results of this study also showed that profitability cannot mediate the effect of good corporate governance mechanisms on company value. It can be suggested to replace the intervening variable with other variables such as quality of earnings instead of profitability since it is declined as an intervening variable. non-executive director and institutional ownership does not contribute any positive and significant effect on company value and profitability. The following research can use another proxy in the measurement process and consider other theories that could explain comprehensively.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Retno Ryani Kusumawati ◽  
Indra Sulistiana

This study was conducted to determine the effect of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) on Financial Performance and Company Value in State-Owned Corporation in Indonesia in the era of 4.0 and society 5.0. Research subjects are state-owned corporation listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) for the 2013-2017 period. The samples taken are 10 State-Owned Corporation (BUMN) that are included in the criteria. The method used to analyze the relationship between variables in this study is multiple linear regression analysis. Hypothesis test results show that the Independent Board of Commissioners and Audit Committee have an effect on the Return on Assets (ROA) with a significance value of 0.012. The results of testing the second hypothesis Independent commissioners and audit committees have no simultaneous effect on Company Values with a significance value of 0.082. Partially the independent Board of Commissioners has an effect on Return On Assets (ROA) and company value. While the second variable of the Audit Committee does not affect the Return on Assets (ROA) and company value.


2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 230
Author(s):  
Ridwan Nurazi ◽  
Intan Zoraya ◽  
Akram Harmoni Wiardi

<pre>The objective of this study is empirically identify the impacts of Good Corporate Governance and capital structure on firm value with financial performance as intervening variable. We operate quantitative approach within the scope of manufacturing company of metal, chemical, and plastic packaging sector which listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange during the 2017-2018 periods as the population. Samples are chosen by purposive sampling method inwhich the company must report the financial statement in a row, obtained 79 observations. The data analysis technique used is financial ratio analysis to determine the condition of the business financial ratios of the variables studied. Data were analyzed using multiple linear regression analysis. The result shows that corporate governance and capital structure influence the firm value, moreover the use of institutional ownership ratio and capital structure will increase the value of the firm. The result also shows that the impact of Corporate governance and capital structure on the company value are mediated by financial performance. It means that the value of the firm can increase if the company able became an effective monitoring tool.</pre>


Author(s):  
Charlie Charlie

<p class="Style1"><em>The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of corporate governance </em><em>(GCG) which is proxied through managerial ownership and institutional ownership, as </em><em>well as earnings management on firm value. The sample used is LQ 45 company with </em><em>observation period from 2011 to 2015. Data analysis method uses multiple linear </em><em>regression. The results of this study are that there are positive and significant effects of </em><em>managerial ownership, institutional ownership and earnings management on firm </em><em>value.</em></p><p class="Style1"><strong><em><br /></em></strong></p>


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Selvia Roos Ana ◽  
Agung Budi Sulistiyo ◽  
Whedy Prasetyo

Abstract:  This study examines the effect of the relationship between intellectual capital, good corporate governance, and firm value by using competitive advantage as mediation. Design/methodology/approach :  This study uses a sample of companies registered in CGPI during the 2014-2018 period. Data analysis using regression and path analysis.Research findings :  The research results show that the creation of a competitive advantage is inseparable from the role of intellectual capital and good corporate governance. In addition, competitive advantage is able to increase firm value but unfortunately it is not able to mediate company value.Theoretical contribution/ Originality :  This study uses M-VAIC to measure intellectual capital where in this measurement there is additional relational capital, and the use of competitive advantage as a mediating variable.Practitioner/Policy implication : This study proves the resourced-based theory which states that a company can win the competition by having a competitive advantage so that in the end it can increase firm value.Research limitation/Implication:  This study only includes CGPI listed companies as the research sample. In addition, the independent variables used are limited to intellectual capital and good corporate governance. Keywords:  intellectual capital, good corporate governance, competitive advantage, company value


2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anggi Adinda Setiarini ◽  
Sulistyo Sulistyo ◽  
Rita Indah Mustikowati

This study aims to determine the effect of good corporate governance mechanisms, corporate social responsibility disclosure, and return on assets to firm value. The population used in this study is a publicly listed banking company listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in the 2014-2015 period and the sample determination method used was purposive judgment sampling. Samples obtained were 42 companies. Data analysis techniques used are descriptive analysis, classic assumption test, multiple linear regression test, and hypothesis testing. This study found that simultaneously the mechanism of good corporate governance, corporate social responsibility disclosure, and return on assets affect the value of the company. Partially, this study found that the mechanism of good corporate governance that was proxied by the board of directors (DD), board of commissioners (DK), managerial ownership (KM), return on assets (ROA) influenced the company value, while institutional ownership (IC) and corporate social responsibility (CSR) does not affect the company's value


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document