scholarly journals STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS;

2012 ◽  
Vol 20 (01) ◽  
pp. 139-143
Author(s):  
ZULFIQAR ALI NAQVI ◽  
QAMAR AZIZ ◽  
ARIF MEMON

Objective: To determine the prevalence of Staph. aureus in burn patients. Setting: Department of Microbiology, BasicMedical Sciences Institute, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi. Period: July 2002 to December 2002. Material and Methods:Out of 52 patients 23 (44%) were found infected by 41 strains of S. aureus in which 10 strains were Methicillin resistant. Results: AllMethicillin sensitive and resistant strains were sensitive to Vancomycin and Chloramphenicol. Other effective drugs against MSSA wereImipenem (93.5%), Cephalothin (77.5%), Clindamycin (68%) while MRSA strains were highly resistant to all other drugs. Conclusions:Gram positive heavily colonize the wound at initial days following burn injury. Once Staph aureus specially MRSA establishing in burn unit,it is very difficult to eradicate these bacteria from burn unit. It is therefore all efforts must made to prevent burn patients from infectionspecially Staph. Aureus infection, by establising infection control team these burn units.

Author(s):  
Vinod Bhavi ◽  
Jas Karan Singh ◽  
Gurpreet Singh ◽  
Deepak Meena

Burn patients are obviously at high risk for infections due to the immune compromising effects of burn injury. E.coli is an important life-threatening pathogen in burn units [1]. The aim of this study was to determine bacteremia  in the surgical and plastic surgery units of Guru Gobind Singh Medical College and Hospital, Faridkot.25 burn patients were chosen at random study staph aureus (6) was the dominant organism followed by  E. Coli (4) in blood culture,. Eight (32%) of the total patients died and 68% survived. Keywords: Burn, Bacteremia, Thrombocytopenia


2009 ◽  
Vol 2009 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kolawole Olubunmi Ogundipe ◽  
Ismaila Abiona Adigun ◽  
Babatunde Akeeb Solagberu

Background/Objective. Burn injury is a devastating injury. The economic drain on the patient's purse is equally devastating. Few studies have examined the cost of managing burn patients particularly the drug component.Methods. The financial implication of drug use in the management of 69 consecutive patients admitted by the burn unit over a period of two years was retrospectively analysed.Results. Thirty-six (52.2%) patients were males and 33 (47.8%) females with a mean age of 17.9 years (). The patients spent an average sum of $91.21 to procure drugs; 84.3% of the costs were for antibiotics, 11.1% for analgesics, and 4.6% for others.Conclusion. Significant amount of money is spent on the procurement of drugs. Most of the money is spent on prescribed antibiotics. Measures that reduce antibiotics use in burn management might relief patients of the huge economic burden associated with its use.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S81-S82
Author(s):  
Kevin M Klifto ◽  
C Scott Hultman

Abstract Introduction Chronic pain, unrelated to the burn itself, can manifest as a long-term complication in patients sustaining burn injuries. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence and compare burn characteristics between burn patients who developed chronic neuropathic pain (CNP) and burn patients without CNP treated at a Burn Center. Methods A single-center, retrospective analysis of 1880 patients admitted to the adult Burn Center was performed from January 1, 2014 through January 1, 2019. Patients included were over the age of fifteen years, sustained a burn injury and were admitted to the Burn Unit. CNP was diagnosed clinically following burn injury. Patients were excluded from the definition of CNP if their pain was due to an underlying medical illness or medication. Comparisons between patients admitted to the Burn Unit with no pain and patients admitted to the Burn Unit who developed CNP were performed. Results One hundred thirteen (n=113) of the 1880 burn patients developed CNP as a direct result of burn injury over five years with a prevalence of 6%. Patients who developed CNP were a significantly older median age [54 vs. 46, p=0.002], abused alcohol [29% vs. 8.5%, p< 0.001], abused substances [31% vs. 9%, p< 0.001], were current everyday smokers [73% vs. 34%, p< 0.001], suffered more full-thickness burns [58% vs. 43%, p< 0.001], greater median %TBSA burns [6 vs. 3.5, p< 0.001], were more often intubated on mechanical ventilation [33% vs. 14%, p< 0.001], greater median number of surgeries [2 vs. 0, p< 0.001] and longer median hospital length of stay (LOS) [10 vs. 3 days, p< 0.001], compared to those who did not develop CNP, respectively. Median patient follow-up was 27 months. Conclusions The prevalence of CNP over five years was 6% in the Burn Center. Older ages, alcohol abuse, substance abuse, current everyday smoking, greater %TBSA burns, third degree burns, being intubated on mechanical ventilation, having more surgeries and longer hospital LOS were associated with developing CNP following burn injury. Applicability of Research to Practice The largest study to date assessing the prevalence of chronic nerve pain following burns. Identified new independent predictors for chronic neuropathic pain following burn injury, not previously assessed in the literature.


2017 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 205951311772820 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anant Dinesh ◽  
Thais Polanco ◽  
Ryan Engdahl

Aerosol sprays are commonly used products in daily living. Aerosols in kitchen products have prompted for use of ‘food grade’ or chemically inert propellants; however, they commonly contain gases or gaseous mixtures such as butane, propane and dimethyl ether that are flammable. When such sprays are used near heat sources, such as kitchen appliances, combustibles in these products can result in ignition and burn injury. Given the ubiquity of such sprays, surprisingly burns sustained from household aerosols are not characterised in the literature. We conducted a retrospective search of all burn patients treated at our hospital which contains a burn unit. Three patients were identified with burn wounds due to household aerosol sprays. All three occurred in the kitchen. and were characterized as first-degree and second-degree burns over the head and neck or upper extremities with one requiring inpatient admission. Where it may be perceived a cause of minor injury, household aerosol burns may result in significant burn injury and hospital admission. Household aerosols and burn injury are reviewed.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S135-S136
Author(s):  
Cameron J Gibson ◽  
Aakanksha Gupta ◽  
Abraham Houng

Abstract Introduction Burn patients are at in increased risk for developing deep vein thromboses (DVT), with rates as high as 6%. Known risk factors include large burn size, use of central lines, increasing age, male, active smoker or alcoholic, increased blood transfusions and surgeries. No study to date has looked specifically at burn location as a possible risk factor. We hypothesized that lower extremity burns with delayed presentation to our burn center are at in increased risk for DVT formation. Methods A DVT screening protocol was developed and implemented for all burn patients admitted to our burn unit starting in May 2017. Patients who presented with lower extremity burns >48 hours from their injury time underwent screening ultrasounds at admission to evaluate for DVT in the affected extremity. Data was collected from May 2017 through December 2018 for all lower extremity patients. Screened patients were identified by reviewing the burn registry for patients admitted >2 days from their injury date and then reviewing the electronic medical record for screening US. DVT rates were compared between screened patients and the overall rate for all admissions during the study period. Results There were 1041 patients admitted to the burn unit during the study period, including 445 lower extremity burns with 118 admitted >48 hours after their burn injury. The overall compliance rate with the screening protocol was 41.5% (49/118). There were a total of 4 DVT’s diagnosed among all admitted patients during the study period (1 lower extremity, 3 upper extremity), giving an overall rate of 0.5% for our unit. No DVT’s were identified in the delayed presentation group (p=0.46). Conclusions Our overall DVT rate was much lower than quoted rates in the literature. Patients with lower extremity burns and delayed presentation to a burn center do not appear to be at increased risk for DVT. Compliance with our screening protocol was relatively poor, which may be due to short hospital stays and unavailability of ultrasound on weekends for non-urgent studies. Applicability of Research to Practice Patients with lower extremity burns should receive routine DVT prophylaxis (chemical and mechanical) similar to other burn patients.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S219-S220
Author(s):  
Spogmai Komak ◽  
James Cross

Abstract Introduction Burn injury is uniquely characterized by the initial traumatic event in addition to the psychiatric component associated with physical change and recovery. Recent work has highlighted the importance of pre-existing psychiatric illness on both recovery and final outcomes in burn patients (Tarrier et al 2005, Hudson et al 2017, Wisely et al 2009). We examined the prevalence and association of psychiatric illness in our ABA verified burn unit. Knowledge of this information is critical in allocation of limited resources aimed toward addressing both the physical and mental aspect of burn injury. Methods The burn registry at a single verified burn center was examined from July 2017-July 2018. All consecutive burn patients with psychiatric illness who were admitted were included. Psychiatric illness was broken down into: depression, anxiety, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia and delirium. Need for psychiatric consultation, %TBSA, length of hospital stay, and operative intervention was also examined. Results 416 patients were admitted during the study period—44 pts (10.5%) had a psychiatric diagnosis on admission. Seventy-five percent of pts were male. The average TBSA burned was 15.3%. Seventy-five percent of patients required psychiatric consultation, and 57% required operative intervention (Table 1). The most common psychiatric condition was anxiety (50%), followed by depression (36%), bipolar disorder (27%), schizophrenia (23%), and delirium (18%). Forty-eight percent of patients had multiple (>1) psychiatric conditions. Female patients had a significant less TBSA burn (5.8%) vs. male (18.2%), P=.001, as well as a shorter LOS (12.1 dys vs. 31.5 dys) p=.004. Conclusions The association between burn injury and pre-existing psychiatric illness is well known (Hudson et al 2017, Wisely et al 2009). We found that over 10% of pts admitted to our burn unit had a psychiatric diagnosis, and a large number of these required further inpatient psychiatry consultation. More than half of patients required operative intervention indicating that severity of burn injury was high, with optimization of pre-existing conditions especially important. Additionally, psychiatric illness did not occur in isolation--48% of pts had >1 psychiatric diagnosis —a finding which has implications for resource allocation for mental health/ dedicated psychiatrist for burn patients. Applicability of Research to Practice Implications for resource allocations for dedicated burn psychiatrist/ resources for mental health.


2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S149-S149
Author(s):  
Meredith Moore ◽  
Parizh David ◽  
Elizabeth Dale ◽  
Julia C Slater

Abstract Introduction Globally, medical centers have faced unprecedented times with the onset of the Novel Coronavirus pandemic. Emergency departments (ED) and burn units have had to adapt to uncertainty and new challenges. At our institution, we had to alter our daily burn practice, physically moving our burn unit to our surgical intensive care unit to accommodate staff cohorting. While some hospitals have seen patient surges, most have endured dramatic decreases in productivity. A UK burn unit documented lower ED presentations and reduced referrals from other centers, with 50% fewer patients admitted to their burns ward (Farroha). In Israel, a 66% decrease in adult burn patients was noted (Kruchevska et al.). We sought to identify the impact of COVID-19 on burn injury epidemiology in our burn unit based in a large, urban, academic medical center. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of our burn database for ED visits and admissions related to burn injuries between March 1st and June 30th in the years 2017, 2018, 2019, and 2020. We looked at the age and sex of patient, type of visit, length of stay (LOS), the mechanism of injury, the setting in which injury occurred, and the details of the injury. We compare annual trends, with emphasis on comparison of 2020 to previous years. Results From admissions and ED data records, 215 patient encounters were reviewed. We saw a yearly rise in total burn patients seen in the ED or admitted to our burn unit 2017–2020 (39, 43, 63, and 70 respectively) with the highest volume of patients in 2020. Mean patient age ranged from 45 (2020) to 51 (2017). More males were burned in all years (male:female ratio 3.9 in 2017, 2.1 in 2018, 2.5 in 2019, 1.9 in 2020). Median LOS in 2020 was 2.5 days, consistent with 2017–2019 values (2, 3, 3, respectively). Between 2017 and 2019, 10%, 2%, and 8% respectively of patients evaluated were treated on an outpatient basis, while in 2020, 20% were outpatient. Rates of flash, scald, flame, chemical, electrical, and contact burns were stable over the period. Of those patients who were admitted, 1.8% sustained work-related burns in 2020 versus 8.9% over 2017–2019. In 2020, 23% of burns were cooking related versus 18% over the prior 3 years. Conclusions Despite documented decreased burn admissions in some units, our unit saw an increase in burn injuries presenting for evaluation in the first 3 months of the COVID-19 pandemic as compared to the analogous period in the three years prior. Burns were less often tied to work-related incidents and more frequently related to cooking injuries. Even with more patients treated and released from the ED, inpatient admission numbers were maintained. These findings support the importance of protecting our staffing and burn unit resources in a pandemic setting in order to appropriately treat regional patients and an increase in home-based injuries.


2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 194-202
Author(s):  
Aditya Wardhana ◽  
Dhita Kurniasari

Background: Burn injury is considered as major problem because of high mortality and morbidity. One of the several managements to decrease the mortality rate is wound excision. This study aimed to describe the characteristics of burn mortality in our burn unit and its association with timing of tangential excision. Method: We collect data of burn patients who died in 2016 at Burn Unit of Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital. We investigate the association of mortality and timing of tangential excision. The data were compared with other studies from online databases. Result: Thirty-four burn patients died at RSCM Burn Unit from January - December 2016. 13 patients underwent early tangential excision, the rest had delayed or no tangential excision. Only length of stay (LOS) has statistically significant result. The early tangential excision group has significantly longer median LOS (p=0.003) compared to delayed tangential excision. From five relevant studies, three studies had higher mortality in early tangential excision group compared to delay group but fewer complications and shorter LOS. Two studies reported a significant reduction in mortality in early tangential excision group while culture positive wounds were more frequent in the delay group. Conclusion: Mortality in our patients in early tangential excision group is fewer than the delayed one. The early tangential excision group has longer length of stay compared to delay tangential excision. Although there are pros and cons from the literature review, we suggest that early tangential excision should be done in burn patients.


2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S13-S14
Author(s):  
Sarah Zavala ◽  
Kate Pape ◽  
Todd A Walroth ◽  
Melissa A Reger ◽  
Katelyn Garner ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction In burn patients, vitamin D deficiency has been associated with increased incidence of sepsis. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of vitamin D deficiency in adult burn patients on hospital length of stay (LOS). Methods This was a multi-center retrospective study of adult patients at 7 burn centers admitted between January 1, 2016 and July 25, 2019 who had a 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) concentration drawn within the first 7 days of injury. Patients were excluded if admitted for a non-burn injury, total body surface area (TBSA) burn less than 5%, pregnant, incarcerated, or made comfort care or expired within 48 hours of admission. The primary endpoint was to compare hospital LOS between burn patients with vitamin D deficiency (defined as 25OHD < 20 ng/mL) and sufficiency (25OHD ≥ 20 ng/mL). Secondary endpoints include in-hospital mortality, ventilator-free days of the first 28, renal replacement therapy (RRT), length of ICU stay, and days requiring vasopressors. Additional data collected included demographics, Charlson Comorbidity Index, injury characteristics, form of vitamin D received (ergocalciferol or cholecalciferol) and dosing during admission, timing of vitamin D initiation, and form of nutrition provided. Dichotomous variables were compared via Chi-square test. Continuous data were compared via student t-test or Mann-Whitney U test. Univariable linear regression was utilized to identify variables associated with LOS (p < 0.05) to analyze further. Cox Proportional Hazard Model was utilized to analyze association with LOS, while censoring for death, and controlling for TBSA, age, presence of inhalation injury, and potential for a center effect. Results Of 1,147 patients screened, 412 were included. Fifty-seven percent were vitamin D deficient. Patients with vitamin D deficiency had longer LOS (18.0 vs 12.0 days, p < 0.001), acute kidney injury (AKI) requiring RRT (7.3 vs 1.7%, p = 0.009), more days requiring vasopressors (mean 1.24 vs 0.58 days, p = 0.008), and fewer ventilator free days of the first 28 days (mean 22.9 vs 25.1, p < 0.001). Univariable analysis identified burn center, AKI, TBSA, inhalation injury, admission concentration, days until concentration drawn, days until initiating supplementation, and dose as significantly associated with LOS. After controlling for center, TBSA, age, and inhalation injury, the best fit model included only deficiency and days until vitamin D initiation. Conclusions Patients with thermal injuries and vitamin D deficiency on admission have increased length of stay and worsened clinical outcomes as compared to patients with sufficient vitamin D concentrations.


Author(s):  
Chimdimma Noelyn Onah ◽  
Richard Allmendinger ◽  
Julia Handl ◽  
Ken W. Dunn

With a reduction in the mortality rate of burn patients, length of stay (LOS) has been increasingly adopted as an outcome measure. Some studies have attempted to identify factors that explain a burn patient’s LOS. However, few have investigated the association between LOS and a patient’s mental and socioeconomic status. There is anecdotal evidence for links between these factors; uncovering these will aid in better addressing the specific physical and emotional needs of burn patients and facilitate the planning of scarce hospital resources. Here, we employ machine learning (clustering) and statistical models (regression) to investigate whether segmentation by socioeconomic/mental status can improve the performance and interpretability of an upstream predictive model, relative to a unitary model. Although we found no significant difference in the unitary model’s performance and the segment-specific models, the interpretation of the segment-specific models reveals a reduced impact of burn severity in LOS prediction with increasing adverse socioeconomic and mental status. Furthermore, the socioeconomic segments’ models highlight an increased influence of living circumstances and source of injury on LOS. These findings suggest that in addition to ensuring that patients’ physical needs are met, management of their mental status is crucial for delivering an effective care plan.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document