scholarly journals Mediation in Marriage Disputes and Divorce (Analytical Study on the Application of Mediation in the Gorontalo Religious Court)

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 99-111
Author(s):  
Faradila Hasan ◽  
Yasin - ◽  
Fikri Amiruddin
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Analytical Study ◽  
Divorce Rate ◽  
Mediation Process ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Marital Disputes ◽  
Religious Courts

Abstract: This article discussed mediation as a way of resolving marital disputes. Divorce was one form of marital dispute in the Religious Courts, and in terms of resolving marital disputes, mediation was required. Although the rules of mediation in the judiciary are very clear, the facts show that the disputing parties and the courts have not optimized their use so that the divorce rate every year does not experience a significant decrease; on the contrary, it increases. The theory regarding mediation procedures in the Religious Courts has clearly been stated in the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia (No. 1 of 2016). This article aims to analyze the implementation of the mediation process at the Gorontalo Religious Court. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct more in-depth research on the effectiveness of the Gorontalo Religious Court to resolve marital disputes that lead to divorce, which can be avoided, and the litigants can get back together and foster a ‘sakinah mawaddah wa rahmah’ household. This article used a qualitative with an empirical juridical approach. It could be concluded that the mediation had been carried out at the Gorontalo Religious Court under the Regulation of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia (No. 1 of 2016). Four factors affect successful and unsuccessful mediation, namely the litigation party factor, the mediator factor, the advocate or lawyer factor, and the representative mediation room factor.

scholarly journals The Adjudication of Marriage Disputes through Mediation at the Manado Religious Court

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-110
Author(s):  
Faradila Hasan ◽  
Nasruddin Yusuf ◽  
Moh. Muzwir R. Luntajo
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Divorce Rate ◽  
Mediation Process ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Government ◽  
Marital Disputes

Abstract: The phenomenon of marital disputes that often end in divorce has been a serious concern of the government, resulting in a regulation on mediation, namely the Regulation of the Supreme Court of Republic of Indonesia (PERMA) Number 1 of 2016. This regulation was made with the hope of reducing the divorce rate caused by marriage disputes. This article discusses the form of marriage dispute resolution at Manado Religious Court with a focus on one type of dispute resolution, namely mediation. This study uses an empirical juridical approach. The research was conducted at the Manado City Religious Court in 2017 and 2020. The result is that the mediation process has been carried out in accordance with the provisions of PERMA No.1 of 2016. However, there have been many obstacles. Thus, the efforts to reduce the divorce rate due to marriage disputes have not undergone significant changes. Keywords: mediation; marriage dispute; Manado religious court. Abstrak: Fenomena sengketa perkawinan yang sering berakhir pada perceraian menjadi perhatian serius dari pemerintah sehingga melahirkan aturan tentang mediasi yaitu Peraturan Mahkamah Agung RI (PERMA) No. 1 Tahun 2016. Aturan ini dibuat dengan harapan menekan angka perceraian yang diakibatkan oleh sengketa perkawinan. Artikel ini membahas mengenai bentuk penyelesaian sengketa perkawinan di Pengadilan Agama Manado dengan fokus pada salah satu jenis penyelesaian sengketa yaitu mediasi. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis empiris. Penelitian ini dilakukan di Pengadilan Agama Kota Manado pada tahun 2017 dan tahun 2020. Hasilnya adalah proses mediasi sudah dilakukan sesuai dengan ketentuan PERMA No.1 Tahun 2016. Namun mengalami benyak kendala sehingga upaya untuk menekan angka perceraian akibat sengketa perkawinan belum mengalami perubahan yang signifikan. Kata-kata kunci: mediasi; sengketa perkawinan; pengadilan agama Manado.

scholarly journals Efektifitas Mediasi Terhadap Perkara Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama Kelas 1a Watampone

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Muh Askaruddin ◽  
Dachran Busthami ◽  
Hasan Kadir
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Community Participation ◽  
Mediation Process ◽  
Contributing Factors ◽  
Mediation Training ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Religious Courts

Tujuan penelitian mengungkap efektivitas mediasi dalam perkara perceraian di Pengadilan Agama Kelas 1A Watampone. Berdasarkan hasil analisa efektivitas mediasi dalam perkara perceraian di Pengadilan Agama Kelas 1A Watampone, menunjukan bahwa mediasi belum efektif. Faktor-faktor penyebabnya adalah: Tingkat kepatuhan masyarakat yang menjalani proses mediasi sangat rendah. Fasilitas dan sarana mediasi di Pengadilan Agama Kelas 1A Watampone masih kurang memadai baik dari segi ruang mediasi maupun fasilitas penunjang didalamnya. Selain Ketua Pengadilan Agama Kelas 1A Watampone, hakim yang ditunjuk menjadi mediator seluruhnya belum mengikuti pelatihan mediasi yang diselenggrakan oleh Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. Penempatan pelaksanaan mediasi di Pengadilan Agama tidak tepat atau tidak sesuai dengan apa yang telah digariskan oleh Allah swt., dalam QS al-Nisa>’/4: 35, tentang kedudukan dan kewenangan hakam (mediator) dalam menyelesaikan konflik yang terjadi dalam rumah tangga. The purpose of the study revealed the mediation method in divorce cases in the Class 1A Religious Court of Watampone. Based on the results of the analysis of mediation in divorce cases in Watampone Class 1A Religious Courts, it shows that mediation has not been effective. The contributing factors are: The level of community participation that supports the mediation process is very low. Mediation facilities and facilities in the Class 1A Religious Court of Watampone are still inadequate in terms of mediation space and supporting facilities therein. In addition to the Chairperson of Class 1A Religious Court Watampone, the judge appointed to be a mediator had fully received mediation training conducted by the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. Placement of mediation in the Religious Courts is not right or not in accordance with what has been outlined by God Almighty.

scholarly journals PERBANDINGAN TUGAS MEDIATOR PADA PENGADILAN AGAMA INDONESIA DENGAN MAHKAMAH SYARIAH MALAYSIA

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 101
Author(s):  
Mardalena Hanifah
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Materials Processing ◽  
Mediation Process ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Legal Principles ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Religious Courts

Article 3 (2) Regulation of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedures, Case Examining Judges in the consideration of a decision must state that the case has been pursued peace through mediation by mentioning the mediator. The court is not only tasked with examining, trying, and resolving cases it receives but also seeks to reconcile the parties. The court, which has been impressed as a law enforcement and justice institution, now appears as an institution that seeks peaceful solutions for the parties. The implementation of Regulation of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedures in Courts can be an eff ort to resolve civil disputes so that the settlement of civil disputes through mediation is the main choice. The research method used is normative legal research which includes research on legal principles which is very basic in guided law. The nature of the research carried out is descriptive, namely research that describes and explains in clear and detailed sentences. The data used are secondary data obtained from literature, consisting of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. Processing and data analysis used qualitative methods. The defi nition of mediation according to the Religious Courts in Indonesia and the Syari’ah Courts in Malaysia is the eff ort of the judges and courts to reconcile the parties so that the divorce process does not continue at the next trial. When the mediation process was carried out at the Indonesian Religious Court and the Syari’ah Court in Malaysia, there was a similarity, namely the mediation process was carried out at the fi rst trial and it was an obligation for the disputing parties in a divorce case to take mediation. according to the procedure for the appointment of mediators at the Indonesian Religious Courts and the Syari’ah Courts in Malaysia and the appointments of these mediators are both made by the judges. 

scholarly journals REVITALIZATION OF BADAN PENASIHATAN, PEMBINAAN DAN PELESTARIAN PERKAWINAN (BP4) IN PERFORMING COURT-ANNEXED MEDIATION FOR MARITAL DISPUTES IN RELIGIOUS COURT IN D.I.YOGYAKART

2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 96
Author(s):  
Haniah Ilhami
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Institutional Transformation ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
Institutional Form ◽  
National Conference ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Marital Disputes ◽  
Religious Courts

This research identify the revitalization of Badan Penasihatan, Pembinaan dan Pelestarian Perkawinan (BP4) after The 14th BP4 National Conference in 2009, in performing Court-annexed mediation for Marital Dispute at Religious Court in D.I. Yogyakarta. This  research founds several institutional transformation of BP4 including the Legal Basis, Institutional Form, Institutional Relation with Ministry of Religious Affair, Employement/Management Provisions, and Financial Provisions. In Performing Court-annexed mediation. BP4 in D.I. Yogyakarta has been cooperating with 2 (two) Religious Courts, both in Wonosari and Yogyakarta through Memorandum of Understanding in form of cooperation in the placement of certified mediator from BP4 and cooperation in funding the certified mediators. All Mediators are bound by Regulation of The Supreme Court No. 1 year 2016 concerning Procedures of Court-annexed Mediation, related to Types  of  Cases  Mediated,  Mediator’s  Fee,  Venue  of  Mediation,  Period  of  Mediation,  and Mediator’s requirement.

scholarly journals PENERAPAN PERATURAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR 1 TAHUN 2016 TENTANG PROSEDUR MEDIASI DI MASA PANDEMI COVID 19. (STUDI DI PENGADILAN AGAMA KAB. KEDIRI)

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 117
Author(s):  
Emi Puasa Handayani ◽  
Zainal Arifin
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Mediation Process ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
Second Stage ◽  
The Third ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Third Stage ◽  
Data Source ◽  
Three Stages ◽  
The Republic

This article is the outcome of research aimed at took two problems. First, what is the procedure for the mediation process in accordance with the Regulation of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 2016. Second, how is the implementation of Regulation of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 2016, during the Covid 19 pandemic at the Kediri District Religious Court. The method used in this research is juridical empirical. The research steps taken were: First, the researcher visited the Kediri District Religious Court offi ce. To fi nd initial data, and interviewed the data source, then processed and presented according to the theory used. The theory used is the legal system. In essence, there are three components in law, namely substance, structure and culture (society). The research found two things, namely: fi rst, that Mediation based on the regulations of the Supreme Court is carried out in three stages, fi rst is pre-mediation, the second stage is the application of mediation and the third stage is the implementation of mediation. The second fi nding is that the implementation of Perma RI Number: 1 of 2016 concerning mediation during the Covid 19 pandemic at the Kediri District Religious Court deviates from the established legal basis. The judge still gave a verdict or sentenced him, even though the Petitioner did not come at the time of mediation on the grounds of the Covid 19 Pandemic.

scholarly journals GUIDELINES FOR PRESIDENTING WOMEN FACING THE LAW IN DIVORCE WITH JUSTICE BASED IN KEBUMEN RELIGION COURT (IMPLEMENTATION OF PERMA NO. 3 YEAR 2017)

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Trubus Wahyudi
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Gender Equality ◽  
Human Dignity ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Gender Perspective ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Religious Courts

An effort to improve the quality of justice with a gender perspective on July 11, 2017 the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia has issued PERMA Number 3 of 2017 concerning Guidelines for Judging Women Against the Law. In line with this study, researchers assume specifically the implementation of Perma Number 3 of 2017 is related to women dealing with law in divorce cases related to the protection of women's rights (ex-wife) along with children's rights due to divorce based on justice. the implementation of PERMA No. 3 of 2017 in the field of litigation duties in the Religious Courts. In the end, judges in trying women's cases dealing with the law must reveal factors based on principles: Appreciation for human dignity, Non-discrimination, Gender Equality, Equality before the law, Justice, Utilization, for the sake of legal certainty.

scholarly journals SOSIALISASI MEDIASI SEBAGAI ALTERNATIF PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA MASYARAKAT DI KECAMATAN ANDIR, BANDUNG

2021 ◽  
pp. 769
Author(s):  
Mia Hadiati ◽  
Indah Siti Aprilia ◽  
Gracia Kamarov
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Research Team ◽  
Third Parties ◽  
Community Leaders ◽  
Mediation Process ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
Consensus Process ◽  
Traditional Leaders ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Republic

Mediation.is one way of.resolving dispute.through negotiation or consensus of the partiees with third parties,namely by mediators who are not entitled to impose or decide disputes. The hallmark of the mediation.proces is thatthe negotiation is the same as the deliberation or consensus process, so there should not be an element of coercionto reject or accept an idea for a settlement during.the mediation process. Everything must be approved bythe.partie. The legal basis and background of mediation, the implementation.of Mediation in Court is the Regulationof the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia No. 1 of 2016 concerning.Mediation Procedures in Courts. Thesocialization method used is lecture and question and answer. The Research Team in collaboration with AndirDistrict will organize a Mediation Socialization activity as an Alternative.for.Dispute Resolution in the Community.This mediation socialization is very beneficial for parties or individuals involved in the dispute process, both asdisputing parties, mediators / mediators and advisors, such as the Camat, Lurah, Village Apparatus, families,traditional leaders, community leaders, and other parties who to deepen understanding in the field of negotiationand mediation.Mediasi merupakan salah satu cara penyelesaian sengketa melalui.perundingana atau.mufakat para pihak denganpihak ketiga yaitu oleh. Mediator.yang tidak berhak untuk memaksakan atau memutuskan sengketa. Ciri khas prosesmediasi adalah perundingannya sama dengan proses.musawarah atau.konsensus, maka tidak boleh ada unsurpemaksaan untuk menolak atau menerima suatu ide penyelesaian.selama.proses mediasi berlangsung. Segalasesuatunya.harus.memperoleh persetujuan.dari kedua belah pihak.. Dasar hukum dan latar belakangmediasi.pelaksanaan Mediasi di Pengadilan.adalah Peraturan makhamah Agung RI No. 1 Tahun.2016 tentangProsedur Mediasi di Pengadilan. Metode Sosialisi yang dilakukan adalah ceramah dan tanyajawab.Tim Penelitibekerjasama dengan Kecamatan Andir akan menyelenggarakan kegiatan Sosialisasi Mediasi sebagaiAlternatif.Penyelesaian Sengketa di Masyarakat. Sosialisasi Mediasi.ini sangat bermanfaat bagi pihak atauindividu.yang terlibat.dalam proses sengketa, baik sebagai para pihak yang.bersengketa, penengah / mediatormaupun pemberi jalan keluar seperti Camat, Lurah, Perangkat Desa, keluarga, ketua adat, Tokoh Masyarakat, danberbagai lapisan masyarakat untuk mendalami pemahaman di bidang negosiasi.dan mediasi.

scholarly journals The competence of Religious Court in Indonesia and Syahadah Istifadhah (Testimonium De auditu) in Case of Itsbat Waqf

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rifqi Qowiyul Iman
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Absolute ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Religious Courts ◽  
Legal Force

This paper examines how exactly the absolute competence of the Religious Courts and the application of syahadah istifadhah (testimonium de auditu) in the case of waqf determination submitted to the Religious Court as a judicial institution under the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. In the discussion, it is explained how the competence of the Religious Court especially in the case of waqf determination as arranged in Law No. 3 Year 2006 About Religious Courts combined with Law Number 41 Year 2004 About Waqf. In addition, this paper also compares between the concept of syahadah istifadhah and testimonium de auditu also its legal force in the case of verification at the court especially in the case of waqf determination. This paper concludes that the assignment of Waqf is the absolute authority of the Religious Courts. In addition, according to Islamic jursiprudence syahadah istifadhah can be used as a means of proof in waqf determination.

scholarly journals THE ROLE OF RELIGIOUS COURT IN ISLAMIC LAW REFORM IN INDONESIA

Asy-Syari ah ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-134
Author(s):  
Amran Suadi
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Innovation Process ◽  
Law Reform ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Republic ◽  
New Formula ◽  
Religious Courts ◽  
Legal Opinion

Abstract: Law, including Islamic law, will evolve with the changes of time, place, situation and tradition. New social problems grow gradually and pose challenges to Islamic law. Reconstruction and reform are inevitable for Islamic law to respond to the current issues. The Islamic law reforms in Indonesia performed through legal enactment, legal opinion (fatwa), and the Religious Courts decisions. New formula for Islamic law in addressing contemporary issues can be built through three processes: conservation, innovation process, and creation. The Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia fully supports the development of Islamic law in Indonesia. The reform of Islamic law by the Supreme Court has been carried out through several instruments, such as the issuance of Perma and SEMA, agreement among justices within the Chamber of the Religious Courts, and creation of jurisprudence.Abstrak: Hukum, termasuk hukum Islam, akan berubah seiring dengan perubahan waktu, tempat, situasi dan tradisi. Masalah sosial baru yang tumbuh secara bertahap tumbuh dan menimbulkan tantangan bagi hukum Islam. Rekonstruksi dan reformasi tidak dapat dihindarkan agar hukum Islam merespons masalah saat ini. Ada tiga tipologi reformasi hukum Islam di Indonesia yang dilakukan melalui pengesahan hukum, pendapat hukum (fatwa), dan keputusan pengadilan dari keputusan Pengadilan Agama. Formula baru untuk hukum Islam dalam menangani masalah kontemporer dapat dibangun berdasarkan tiga proses: proses konservasi, proses inovasi, dan proses penciptaan. Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia sepenuhnya mendukung pengem­bangan hukum Islam di Indonesia. Reformasi hukum Islam oleh Mahkamah Agung telah dilakukan melalui beberapa instrumen, seperti penerbitan Perma dan SEMA, kesepakatan di antara para hakim di Kamar Pengadilan Agama, dan penciptaan yurisprudensi yang diambil dari kasasi.

scholarly journals Iktikat Baik Para Pihak dalam Pelaksanaan Mediasi di Pengadilan Agama

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 63
Author(s):  
Amiril Lizuardi ◽  
Sudirman Sudirman ◽  
Ahmad Izzuddin
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Empirical Research ◽  
Qualitative Approach ◽  
Good Faith ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Religious Courts

<p class="isi">This article aims to describe the principle of good faith in the Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2016 concerning Mediation in the Court while at the same time describing the implementation of the principle of good faith in the conduct of mediation in the Malang District Religious Court. This research is included in empirical research using a qualitative approach. The results of the discussion of this article indicate that Mediation is an inseparable part of the procedure in the Religious Courts as stipulated in the Indonesian Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2016 concerning Procedure for Mediation in Courts. In the Republic of Indonesia's Supreme Court Regulation Number, 1 of 2016, the provisions of good faith in the implementation of mediation were added. The mediator has the authority to evaluate the intentions of the parties during the mediation.</p>Artikel ini bertujuan mendeskripsikan asas iktikad baik dalam Peraturan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 tentang Mediasi di Pengadilan sekaligus mendeskripsikan implementasi asas iktikad baik dalam pelaksanaan mediasi di Pengadilan Agama Kabupaten Malang. Penelitian ini termasuk dalam penelitan empiris dengan menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif. Hasil pembahasan artikel ini menunjukkan bahwa Mediasi merupakan bagian yang tidak dapat dipisahkan dari prosedur beracara di Pengadilan Agama sebagaimana diatur dalam Peraturan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 tentang Prosedur Mediasi di Pengadilan. Dalam Peraturan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 ditambahkan tentang ketentuan iktikad baik dalam pelaksanaan mediasi. Mediator memiliki wewenang untuk melakukan penilaian terhadap iktikad para pihak selama pelaksanaan mediasi.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document