scholarly journals EFEKTIVITAS PENGGUNAAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN TAI DIBANDING DENGAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN SAVI TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR MATEMATIKA

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sudarwanti Sudarwanti ◽  
Esti Harini

This study aims to find out the effectiveness of TAI model through mathematics learning. This research was a quasi-experimental research. Sampling technique in this research used Cluster Random Sampling technique. Data collection technique used documentation and tests. The data analysis technique used two-way variance analysis with unequal cell. The result of this research was that learning using TAI model is not more effective to use (Fobs< Ftable) with 1,508<4.00; Students who have high initial ability, have mathematics learning outcomes that are no better than those with moderate and low-skilled students (Fobs< Ftable) with 2,015< 3.15; There is no interaction between the learning model used and the students 'initial ability to the students' mathematics learning outcomes (Fobs< Ftable= 0,501<3.15). A suggestion on the results of this study is in the process of teaching and learning teachers should be able to create an atmosphere of learning that can make students become more active.

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wide Sumiati ◽  
A.A Sujadi

This study aims to find out the effectiveness of TAI model through mathematics learning outcomes in terms of students' student activity. This research was a quasi-experimental research. Sampling technique in this research used Cluster Random Sampling technique. Data collection technique used questionnaire and tests. The data analysis technique used two-way variance analysis with unequal cell. The result of this research was that learning using TAI model is not more effective to use (Fobs< Ftable) with 2.859 <4.00; Students who have high student activity, have mathematics learning outcomes that are no better than those with moderate and low-skilled students (Fobs< Ftable) with 0.5576 < 3.15; There is no interaction between the learning model used and the student activity to the students' mathematics learning outcomes (Fobs< Ftable= 0.44 <3.15). A suggestion on the results of this study is in the process of teaching and learning teachers should be able to create an atmosphere of learning that can make students become more active.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 40
Author(s):  
Iwan Kurnianto ◽  
Budi Usodo ◽  
Sri Subanti

<div class="WordSection1"><p class="BodyAbstract">This study aims to determine: which ones provide better Mathematics learning outcomes; which students have better Mathematics learning achievement, students with high, medium or low creativity; for each creativity level that gives better Mathematics learning outcomes; for each mathematics learning model that has better mathematics learning achievement in students of high, medium, or low creativity on Numbers material for learning TGT, TAI. This type of research is a quasi-experimental research with a 3 x 3 factorial design. The population in this study were all students of grade VII SMP in Kudus Regency 2015/2016 academic year. The research sample was taken using stratified cluster random sampling technique. The samples of this study were students of class VII SMP Negeri 1 Mejobo, SMP Negeri 1 Bae, and SMP Negeri 3 Bae. The results obtained, TGT provides better mathematics learning achievement than TAI. students with high and moderate creativity have the same mathematics learning achievement. students with TGT have better mathematics learning achievement than TAI students. students with high and moderate creativity have the same mathematics learning achievement.</p></div><p class="BodyAbstract"> </p>


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 245-256
Author(s):  
Lia Rahmawati ◽  
Ibrahim Ibrahim

AbstrakLatar belakang penelitian yaitu pentingnya kecerdasan logis matematis dan linguistik dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar. Penelitian bertujuan memprediksi hasil belajar matematika siswa berdasarkan kecerdasan logis matematis dan linguistik. Metode penelitian yaitu korelasional-kuantitatif yang dilaksanakan di SMPN 16 Yogyakarta di kelas VII A, VII B, dan VII C tahun pelajaran 2019/2020.  Peneliti menggunakan 30 siswa sebagai sampel dan teknik cluster random sampling sebagai metode pengambilan sampel, yaitu dengan mengambil 10 siswa pada setiap cluster yang ditetapkan. Dengan penggunaan cluster random sampling, peneliti dapat menentukan sampel dari pengambilan setiap cluster, sehingga sampel yang digunakan bisa merata. Instrumen yang digunakan adalah skala kecerdasan logis matematis dan kecerdasan linguistik. Teknik analisis data menggunakan analisis regresi ganda yang dilakukan dengan SPSS 25. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa terdapat pengaruh positif kecerdasan logis matematis dan linguistik terhadap hasil belajar matematika siswa. Kecerdasan logis matematis dan linguistik turut andil sebagai prediktor hasil belajar matematika siswa. AbstractThe research background is the importance of mathematical logical intelligence and linguistic in influencing learning outcomes. The research aims to predict student learning outcomes based on mathematical logical intelligence and linguistics. The method of research is correlational-quantitative which was carried out at SMPN 16th Yogyakarta in classes VII A, VII B, and VII C in 2019/2020. Researchers used 30 students as samples and cluster random sampling technique as sampling method, namely by taking 10 students in each cluster that was determined. By using cluster random sampling, researchers can determine the sample from each cluster, so that the sample used can be evenly distributed. The instrument used is a scale of logical-mathematical intelligence and linguistic intelligence. The data analysis technique used multiple regression analysis which was carried out with SPSS 25. The results of the analysis showed that there was a positive effect of mathematical and linguistic logical intelligence on students' mathematics learning outcomes. Mathematical logical intelligence and linguistic contribute as a predictor of student mathematics learning outcomes.


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 9
Author(s):  
Utin Desy Susiaty ◽  
Hodiyanto Hodiyanto

<p>The aims of this study is to find out: (1) a better learning model between contextual, realistic or conventional; (2) better learning outcomes between students with high, medium or low interpersonal intelligence; (3) better learning outcomes between students with high, medium or low interpersonal intelligence on each learning model; (4) a better learning model between contextual, realistic or conventional at each level of interpersonal intelligence. This research is using the experimental method. The sampling technique is cluster random sampling. Data collection tools used were questionnaires and tests. The data analysis technique used is the analysis of three-way variance with unequal cells. The results showed that: (1) contextual learning models are better than realistic but provide the same learning outcomes as conventional, while realistic and conventional learning outcomes are equally good; (2) students who have high, medium or low interpersonal intelligence have the same learning outcomes; (3) In each learning model, students with high, medium and low interpersonal intelligence have the same learning outcomes; (4) At each level of interpersonal intelligence, the contextual learning model is better than realistic and conventional.</p>


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 332
Author(s):  
Puji Rosaldy ◽  
Syuraini Syuraini

This research was motivated by the learning outcomes of citizens studying sociology subjects in the SPNF-SKB Package C program in Pariaman City. The purpose of this study was to determine the differences in the learning outcomes of learning residents on sociology subjects in the SPNF-SKB Package C program in Pariaman City.This type of research is a type of comparative causal research. The population in this study were 50 students of the Pariaman City SPNF-SKB Package C Program. The sample in this study amounted to 40 residents studied using cluster random sampling technique. The data collection technique used is documentation. The data analysis technique used is descriptive quantitative. Analysis of the data used quantitatively by using the t-test using SPSS16 software.Based on the results of the research on the learning outcomes of the residents of the Package C Program before the pandemic, the highest was in the very good category, amounting to 29 people with a percentage of 72.5%, of the 40 residents studying the Package C Program before the pandemic and the value of learning outcomes for learning residents during the covid pandemic. the highest is the unfavorable category, totaling 19 learning residents with a percentage of 47.5% of the 40 residents studying the Package C Program during the pandemic. So there are differences in the learning outcomes of learning residents before the Covid pandemic with the learning outcomes of learning residents during the Covid pandemic, meaning that the Ha hypothesis is accepted. It is recommended for the department of education outside the school of Padang State University to use the results of this study as a reference in teaching materials for courses. Keywords: learning outcomes, Pandemic Covid-19


Author(s):  
Windasari Windasari ◽  
Muchammad Zulham Yahya

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of compensation on the teacher performance in vocational school. This research used a quantitative approach. Data collection technique was by distributing a questionnaire using a five-likert scale. The sampling technique used was cluster random sampling. Samples taken from each school amounted to 3 teachers from each department, so there were 42 respondents from 5 schools. Validity test used the Pearson product moment. The analysis technique used to answer the research hypothesis uses simple linear regression. The results showed that teacher compensation had an effect on teacher performance in vocational high school.


Author(s):  
Utin Desy Susiaty ◽  
Dwi Oktaviana

Abstrak Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui: (1) manakah yang memberikan prestasi belajar yang lebih baik, metode ceramah atau metode diskusi; (2) manakah yang memiliki prestasi belajar yang lebih baik, mahasiswa laki-laki atau perempuan; (3) pada masing-masing model pembelajaran, manakah yang mempunyai prestasi belajar yang lebih baik, mahasiswa laki-laki atau perempuan; (4) pada masing-masing jenis kelamin, manakah yang memberikan prestasi yang lebih baik, metode ceramah atau metode diskusi. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimental semu dengan populasi seluruh mahasiswa semester 5 di kelas pagi Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika IKIP-PGRI Pontianak. Pengambilan sampel dilakukan dengan teknik stratified cluster random sampling. Sampel dalam penelitian ini sebanyak 68 mahasiswa. Teknik pengumpulan data meliputi metode dokumentasi untuk mendapatkan nilai MID mata kuliah Matematika Ekonomi tahun akademik 2015/2016 sebagai data kemampuan awal dan nilai UAS mata kuliah Matematika Ekonomi untuk data prestasi belajar matematika mahasiswa. Uji hipotesis penelitian menggunakan analisis variansi dua jalan dengan sel tak sama. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan sebagai berikut. (1) Pembelajaran matematika ekonomi menggunakan metode ceramah menghasilkan prestasi belajar matematika yang sama dengan metode diskusi. (2) Mahasiswa laki-laki maupun perempuan memiliki prestasi belajar matematika yang sama. (3) Pada masing-masing metode pembelajaran, mahasiswa laki-laki maupun perempuan memiliki prestasi belajar matematika yang sama. (4) Pada masing-masing jenis kelamin, pembelajaran matematika ekonomi menggunakan metode ceramah dan metode diskusi menghasilkan prestasi belajar matematika yang sama. Kata kunci: metode ceramah, metode diskusi, jenis kelamin Abstract The aims of this study were to investigate: (1) which learning method produces student’s better mathematics learning achievement, speech method or discussion method; (2) which student’s have better mathematics learning achievement, male or female; (3) viewed from learning methods, which student’s have better mathematics learning achievement, male or female; (4) viewed from gender, which learning method produces better mathematics learning achievement, speech method or discussion method. This research used quasi experimental method with its population included all of students of 5th semester in morning class Program Study of Mathematics Education IKIP-PGRI Pontianak. Sampling was done by stratified cluster random sampling technique. The size of the sample was 68 students. The data collection technique was include the documentation method to get the 2015/2016 MID Test of Economy Mathematics subject for initial capability data before the experiment and Final test of Economy Mathematics subject for mathematics student’s achievement data. The data was analyzed using analysis of variance. Based on these results it can be concluded as follows. (1) Economy mathematics learning using speech method produced the same mathematics achievement as using discussion method. (2) For male or female students have the same mathematics achievement. (3) Viewed from learning method, male or female students have the same mathematics achievement. (4) Viewed from gender, economy mathematics learning using speech method and discussion method have the same mathematics achievement. Keywords: speech method, discussion method, gender


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 352
Author(s):  
Desmira Wati ◽  
Wirdatul Aini

The low interest in entrepreneurship of graduates of BLK Padang barista training, which is thought to be due to the low achievement of barista training graduates at BLK Padang, is the background of this research. Objectives (1) aim to excel (2) describe interest in entrepreneurship (3) describe the relationship between achievement motivation and entrepreneurial interest for barista trainer graduates. The approach in this study is a quantitative correlational type. In this study, the population was 64 people. The sampling technique used cluster random sampling, the 50% sample consisted of 32 people. The data collection technique is a questionnaire. The data analysis technique used theoretical theory, percentage and Spearman Rho. This study found that (1) achievement motivation was categorized as moderate. (2) the entrepreneurship interest of the barista training students is categorized as moderate. (3) There is a significant relationship between achievement motivation and the interest of graduates of barista training at BLK Padang.


2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 135
Author(s):  
Bastomi Saputra ◽  
Syubhan Annur ◽  
Mastuang Mastuang

The background of this research is because 79,33% of students of class XI MIPA SMA Negeri 7 Banjarmasin have not reached the value of completeness in Middle Semester test. This is because students tend to memorize the concept, but do not know how the concept is obtained, and not able to apply the concept in a new situation. This study aims to analyze differences in learning outcomes by using the 5E learning model and Generative Learning in class XI MIPA SMA Negeri 7 Banjarmasin. This research is a quasi-experimental research with nonequivalent group pretest-posttest design. Sampling using cluster random sampling technique. Based on the technique, obtained sample that is class XI MIPA 2 and XI MIPA 4. Instrument of this research is test result of learning, that is pretest and postest. Data analysis technique using t-test. The results showed that there are differences in learning outcomes of learners between the 5E learning model and Generative Learning.


Author(s):  
Arif Jatmiko ◽  
Insih Wilujeng

ANALISIS KETERAMPILAN SOSIAL SISWA PADA METODE KOOPERATIF DALAM PEMBELAJARAN IPAAbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis perbedaan pengaruh pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Jigsaw dan tipe Team Assisted Individualization (TAI) yang ditinjau dari keterampilan sosial siswa Kelas VIII SMP Negeri 1 Bulukerto. Penelitian ini termasuk jenis quasi experimental atau penelitian eksperimen semu, dengan desain penelitian pretest-posttest with nonequivalent group design. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah semua Kelas VIII di SMP Negeri 1 Bulukerto, Wonogiri Tahun Pelajaran 2015/2016. Sampel dipilih dua kelas dengan menggunakan teknik cluster random sampling. Kelas eksperimen pertama diberi perlakuan dengan pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Jigsaw dan kelas eksperimen kedua diberi perlakuan dengan pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TAI. Data dikumpulkan dengan menggunakan teknik observasi. Data dianalisis dengan statistik uji independent t test pada taraf signifikansi 5%. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Jigsaw lebih berpengaruh dibandingkan tipe TAI terhadap keterampilan sosial siswa. Berdasarkan hasil observasi, secara umum pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Jigsaw dan tipe TAI memberikan pengaruh terhadap peningkatan keterampilan sosial siswa.Kata kunci: pembelajaran kooperatif, keterampilan social, IPAAbstractThis study was aimed at analyzing the influences of cooperative learning types, namely Jigsaw and Assisted Individualization Team (TAI) in terms of social skills of the eighth-grade students of SMP Negeri 1 Bulukerto. The study used a quasi-experimental method using a pretest-posttest design with nonequivalent groups. The population of this study was grade-eight students of SMP Negeri 1 Bulukerto, Wonogiri, Year 2015/2016. The samples were two classes selected using the cluster random sampling technique. The first experimental class was treated using Jigsaw cooperative learning and the second experimental class was treated using TAI cooperative learning. The data collection technique used was observation. The results show that Jigsaw cooperative learning is more influential than TAI in improving the social skills of the students. Based on the observation, generally, Jigsaw and TAI cooperative learning techniques give influence to the improvement of the studentssocial skills.Keywords: cooperative learning, social skills, science


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document