scholarly journals PERAN DKPP DALAM MENEGAKKAN KODE ETIK PENYELENGGARA PEMILU DAN MEWUJUDKAN PILKADA BERMARTABAT

JAP UNWIRA ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 115-129
Author(s):  
Mikhael Feka ◽  
Dwityas Witarti Rabawati ◽  
Yohanes Arman ◽  
Egidius Taemenas

Abstract The Honorary Council for General Election Organizers  (DKPP) is an element in the general election execution together with the General Election Commission (KPU) and the General Election Supervision Body (Bawaslu). The main function of the DKPP is to enforce the ethical code for the general election organizers. A dignified general election and election of district heads starts from the general election organizers who are supposed to uphold the general election ethics, although that does not constitute a single factor, in a sense that a dignified general election should be the responsibility of all elements of general election that include the organizers, the pair candidates, political parties, success team, civil servants, national and districts governments, as well as other stakeholders. The problem is that the DKPP’s authority  is limited to the execution of the general election and does not cover the whole system of the carrying out of the general election and therefore it is difficult to realize a dignified election of district heads, despite the fact that a dignified election will bring about dignified leaders. As a democratic country, Indonesia is supposed to consider not only ethical code for the general election organizers but also ethical code for the whole implementation of the general election. 

2008 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. 289-291
Author(s):  
Wayne P. Steger

Understanding why certain candidates get nominated is an important aspect of political scientists. This topic is a narrow one and influences a wider variety of subjects such as the political parties, general elections, and even the extent to which the United States is a democratic country. Presidential nominees matter—they become the foremost spokesperson and the personified image of the party (Miller and Gronbeck 1994), the main selectors of issues and policies for their party’s general election campaign (Petrocik 1996; Tedesco 2001), a major force in defining the ideological direction of a political party (Herrera 1995), and candidates that voters select among in the general election. This volume is devoted to presidential nominations and the 2008 nomination specifically.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Suparnyo Suparnyo

The election of regional leaders conducted directly by the community is believed to result in a democratic government. The formed government is expected to be more open, more responsive, and to carry out the aspirations of the people so that it can realize a government that comes from the people, by the people, and for the people. A person can nominate him/herself as a candidate for Regent or Deputy Regent if supported by some residents, by Political Parties or Combined Political Parties. The relatively weak support of the population or political parties or combined political parties has resulted in very few candidates for regent or deputy regent, even only one pair of candidates can occur as in Pati Regency. The study aims to know how the policy in the future (Prospective Model) should be taken so that the single-candidate for Regent or Deputy Regent in a general election does not happen. By using a sociological juridical approach, collecting primary and secondary data, processing and analyzing data, the objective of the study can be reached.The policy that needs to be taken by the government so that in the future there will be no single candidate is by giving obligations to political parties to conduct cadre recruitment to become candidates for regional leaders. Besides, the General Election Commission needs to make a scheme that is easier and more flexible for individual candidates regarding administrative requirements, procedures, and mechanisms for gathering support, and there needs to be a new policy so that the potential for a single-candidate can be eliminated or not occur.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 26
Author(s):  
Agus Manfaluthi

Objective research titled Judicial Review of Registration Mechanism for Independent Candidates and Political Parties in the General Election of Mayor and Deputy Mayor (Pilwali) in 2013 to determine the depth of the registration mechanism for independent candidates and political parties in the general election of Mayor and Deputy Mayor in Kediri. The question is whether Kediri has been carrying out the registration procedure in accordance with the rules applicable. To mind the new independent candidates Pilwali adopted in 2013 in Kediri where it is the first time to implement Election Mayor followed by independent candidates. This research is conducted using empirical methods to the scope of research locations in the Election Commission office Kediri. The result: Based on Law Number 12 Year 2008 began chapters 58 to 60, the General Election Commission (KPU), Kediri City has been implementing a mechanism for registration of candidates for May or and Deputy Mayor came from political parties, the combined political parties and candidates Individual earnest, result all independent either from independent or from political party and coalition of political parties passed the registration stage


Humaniora ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 97
Author(s):  
Lidya Wati Evelina ◽  
Mia Angeline

Data from General Election Commission (KPU) said the 2009 election abstentions level is still relatively high , ie 49,212,161 non voters (29.1%) of the 176,411,434 voters. The low political participation of Indonesian society is caused by many cases convoluting political parties, the lack of potential figure of political parties, and the decline of the party's image. Research aims to find the 2014 election socialization efforts of the General Election Commission to reduce the level of abstentions and how the media shape public opinion to reduce the abstentees. Research used qualitative method with data collection through interview and literature. Data were analyzed with data reduction and triangulation. The study found the socialization media used for 2014 election were national and regional media socializing to various schools and universities in Indonesia. KPU also recruited agents of socialization in 2014, put up posters and banners, did activities along with agents of socialization, and increased the number of polling stations (TPS). KPU disseminated the information to the mass media to be publicized. The goal is to involve the community and to contribute to the success of the election. Electronic mass media need to make a program that helps the socialization of the election, for example having an open debate of all parties participating in the election in a special slot provided by the government then they explain the program and their pro-people commitments. As conclusions, the commission and the media have not been systematically designing programs that can persuade public to participate in the election of 2014. Research recommends the media to make a program that is interactive and engaging based on local tastes and culture to provide a common understanding about the 2014 election. 


2015 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 150
Author(s):  
Margareta Aulia Rahman

The development of information technology affects students in searching and finding information, particularly information regarding the General Election. Theexplosion of information on mass media about the elections resulted impact (both positive and negative) to the potential voters. Nowadays, media plays role as a tool for political parties to lead public opinion to support their parties. Based on the data provided by General Election Commission (KPU) in 2014, 20% of voters were identified as students (teens). This is a qualitative research with case study methodwhich aims to gain insight about interpretation, understanding, perceptions and feelings of teenage voters’ behavior in searching and finding information about general election in Indonesia year 2014. The data were collected by conducting interview and observation. Informants (six persons) in this study were students, aged 17-18 years, who studying in government senior high school in Depok. The results of this study indicates that informants using social media to keep update about general election. Besides, they also gain information from their parents and close friends. Unfortunatelly, they were not able to identify which information which are correct or not, so they rely on people around them to make sure whether they did right decision. Therefore, this study also suggest that KPU needs to develop promotion strategy that suitable for teens about general election.


2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Noer Sida

AbstractThe general election is a means of implementing the people's sovereignty to elect people who will occupy the seat of government. This general election was held to realize a democratic country, where the leaders were chosen based on the majority of votes. Countries that adhere to democracy generally accommodate the political rights of their citizens in an election, whether they are direct or indirect. Basically everyone has the right to participate in government in other words everyone has the right to be elected or elected. Regarding to Election Commission Regulation Number 20 Year 2018 regarding the Nomination of Members of The House Representatives, Assembly at Provincial and Assembly at Regional, there is one requirement for legislative candidate became controversial because there is a prohibition on ex-prisoners of corruption, drugs (as a dealer), and sexual crimes against children to be the Nomination of Members of The House Representatives, Assembly at Provincial and Assembly at Regional. Some ex-convicts already did judicial review, therefore we need to understand the legality of the regulation for ex-convicts regarding to election.Key Words: Human Rights, Right to Participate in Government, Ex-convictAbstrakPemilihan umum adalah adalah sarana pelaksanaan kedaulatan rakyat untuk memilih orang-orang yang akan menduduki kursi pemerintahan. Pemilihan umum ini diadakan untuk mewujudkan negara yang demokrasi, di mana para pemimpinnya dipilih berdasarkan suara mayoritas terbanyak. Negara-negara yang menganut demokrasi, pada umumnya mengakomodir hak politik warga negaranya dalam suatu penyelenggaraan pemilihan umum, baik itu bersifat langsung maupun tidak langsung. Pada dasarnya setiap orang memiliki hak untuk berpartisipasi dalam pemerintahan dengan kata lain setiap orang memiliki hak untuk dipilih maupun memilih. Peraturan KPU Nomor 20 Tahun 2018 tentang Pencalonan Anggota DPR, DPRD Provinsi dan DPRD Kabupaten/Kota memberikan batasan satu syarat bagi calon anggota legislatif yang menjadi kontroversi karena adanya larangan bagi mantan narapidana  korupsi, narkoba (sebagai bandar), dan kejahatan seksual terhadap anak untuk mencalonkan diri sebagai anggota DPR, DPRD Provinsi dan DPRD Kabupaten/Kota. Beberapa pihak yang merasa dirugikan oleh peraturan tersebut mengajukan judicial review, oleh karena itu, patut dikaji bagaimana legalitas hak yang dimiliki oleh mantan narapidana dalam pemilihan umum.Kata Kunci: Hak Asasi Manusia, Hak untuk Turut Serta dalam Pemerintahan, Mantan Narapidana.


Humaniora ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 233
Author(s):  
Nani Mediatati ◽  
Kristina Roseven Nababan

This research aimed to describe the form and the level of political participation of the Getasan district community in the election of Semarang Regency in 2015. Data collection techniques were through interviews, observations, and document studies. Sample research amounted to 182 respondents that were taken from 13 villages in the district of Getasan, and each village was taken 14 respondents. While secondary data of literature studies and studies of documents were both derived from the contestants, the general election commission district, the mass media, and other relevant sources. There were two candidates for the regent and vice-regent period 2015-2020; they were Mundjirin with Ngesti Nugraha that supported by three political parties, and the second, Nur Jatmiko with Mas’ud Ridwan that supported by four political parties. The results show that the form of political participation in the community of Getasan in the election year 2015 can be listed into nine activities, such as participation in one of the political parties, the committee of elections, socialization the candidate, campaign, become a victory team participated in the procurement of polling stations, participated in the voting, participated in the security voting in polling stations, and participated in the process calculation of the vote.


2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmad Riyadh U.B. ◽  
Hendra Sukmana

The aim of this research was to discuss the model of recruiting candidates for legislative is conducted by political parties in Sidoarjo Regency. This research used descriptive qualitative. This research was conducted at the Governing Council of Political Parties in Sidoarjo Regency. Informants of this study were leaders of political parties in Sidoarjo, legislative candidates from political parties in Sidoarjo. The results showed that the model of recruiting candidates for legislative in accordance with collaboration models included models of Barber, Snowiss, Rush & Althoff et al. This can be seen from some of the steps in the recruitment socialization of registration, selection, after that determination of legislative candidate by a team of Election Campaign Boar (Bappilu) political party in the Sidoarjo Regency and the serial number in accordance with the criteria of the political party chairman and Election Campaign Boar (Bappilu). Furthermore, it is registered with the General Election Commission (KPU) Sidoarjo regency set to be candidates for Legislative (candidates) remain with serial numbers.


ADALAH ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ida Susilowati

Abstract:The 2019 Presidential General Election is a continuation of the political battle between the two camps, namely the Prabowo camp and the Joko Widodo camp. The two camps have the same strong support, both from the people as voters, as well as the support of political parties participating in the election. After the vote on April 17, 2019, each party claimed to have won the election. Jokowi's camp showed his victory with the results of the Quick Count, while Prabowo's camp showed its victory with the results of their own real count. This debate does not end if the General Election Commission does not immediately announce the results of the general election.Keywords: Presidential Election, Counter Attack, Real Count. Abstrak:Pemilihan Umum Presiden 2019 merupakan kelanjutan pertarungan politik antara dua kubu yaitu kubu Prabowo dan kubu Joko Widodo. Kedua kubu memiliki dukungan yang sama-sama kuat, baik dukungan dari rakyat sebagai pemilik suara, maupun dukungan partai politik peserta pemilu. Pasca pemungutan suara tanggal 17 Agustus, masing-masing pihak mengklaim telah memenangkan pemilu. Kubu Jokowi menunjukkan kemenangannya dengan perolehan hasil dari Quick Count, sedang kubu Prabowo menunjukkan kemenangannya dengan hasil real count yang mereka lakukan sendiri. Perdebatan ini tidak berujung bila Komisi Pemilihan Umum tidak segera mengumumkan hasil pemilihan umum.Kata Kunci: Pemilihan Umum Presiden, Counter  Attack, Real Count. 


Asy-Syari ah ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 213-225
Author(s):  
Habibi Habibi

AbstractThe general election is activities of citizens, which are held every five years. In this activity the General Election Commission (KPU) as the organizer prepares all the needs to run elections based on related regulations, which has been changed several times. In former regulation, there is no stipulation on independent candidate nor  single-candidate local leader election. Political parties has roles to fulfil, two of them are political education and regeneration of political cadres. There are 17 political parties in Tasikmalaya but none of them nominate their best cadres. This article tries to describe the implications of single candidate in head of regency election to political parties. By applying qualitative research and empirical-juridical approach, it shows that there was an agreement between political parties in 2015 Tasikmalaya head of regency election to advocate single candidate, while independent candidates as alternative choice for people should fulfil various requirements that hindered their candidacies. Normatifly this phenomena has legal base with the Constitutional Court Decision No. 100/PUU/XIII/2015 that granted Effendi Ghazali’s plead, but substantially damaging democracy. It is feared to occur that a candidate who has strong financial backup influences political elite to support single candidacy. This condition can also discourage political partied to generate new cadres that has great capabilities to compete in general elections.Keywords:head of regency election, single candidate, political party Abstrak Pemilihan Umum adalah kegiatan warga Negara yang diselenggarakan setiap lima tahun sekali, dalam kegiatan ini KPU sebagai lembaga penyelenggara memper­siapkan segala kebutuhan untuk berjalannya pemilihan. Regulasi UU yang berkaitan dengan pemilihan kepala daerah sudah mengalami beberapa perubahan. UU sebelumnya tidak mengatur  calon tunggal dalam konstestasi pilkada. Munculnya fenemona calon tunggal mendorong Mahkamah Konstitusi mengeluarkan  putusan untuk diper­silahkan­nya calon tunggal. Uniknya salah satu tugas peran dan fungsi partai politik adalah edukasi politik, kaderisasi, lembaga yang kompetitif dalam pilkada, tidak mau mencalonkan dari kader-kader terbaiknya, padahal jumlah partai saat ini di Kabupaten Tasikmalaya sudah mencapai 17 partai. Tujuan tulisan ini adalah untuk memaparkanimplikasi calon tunggal kepala daerah Kabupaten Tasikmalaya terhadap partai politik. Dengan pendekatan yuridis empiris, hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat kesepakatan antar parpol pada masa pemilu tahun 2015 di Kabupaten Tasikmalaya untuk mengusung satu pasangan saja. Adapun calon perseorangan sebagai pilihan alternatif dihadapkan pada persyaratan yang menghambat proses pencalonan. Secara normatif hal tersebut tidak menjadi masalah dengan munculnya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 100/PUU/XIII /2015, namun secara substansi demokrasi hal tersebut berdampak buruk. Dikhawatirkan muncul kecenderungan pasangan calon yang mempunyai modal besar untuk membayar elit-elit politik agar dapat mempengaruhi munculnya calon tunggal serta mengurangi kemampuan organisasi dalam mencetak kader dan pemimpin yang mampu bersaing di arena pemilu.Kata kunci: Pemilihan Kepala Daerah, kandidat tunggal, partai politik.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document