scholarly journals PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN RECIPROCAL TEACHING TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI KEMANDIRIAN BELAJAR PESERTA DIDIK

Author(s):  
Laila Hidayah ◽  
Satrio Wicaksono Sudarman ◽  
Ira Vahlia

The study aims to find out 1) whether or not there is an effect of the Reciprocal Teaching model on students' mathematics learning outcomes. 2) which ones have good mathematical learning outcomes between those who have high, moderate learning independence. 3) interactions between Reciprocal Teaching and conventional learning models. The data analysis technique uses hypothesis testing of two-way anava with unequal cells. Research conclusions: 1) There is an influence of mathematics learning outcomes between those who learn using the Reciprocal Teaching and conventional learning models. 2) Mathematics learning outcomes that have high learning independence are better than those with moderate learning independence and mathematics learning outcomes that have moderate independence are better than those with low learning independence. 3) There is an interaction between Reciprocal Teaching and conventional learning models and learning independence on mathematics learning outcomes in those who have high, medium and low learning independence.

Eksponen ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 72-79
Author(s):  
Venty Meilasari

This research aimed to find out: (1) which one providing better mathematics learning outcomes, GI model or direct learning model, (2) which one providing better mathematics learning outcomes, the high, medium or low learning independence students, (3) interaction between learning models and learning independence on mathematics learning outcomes. This research used the quasi-experimental research method with 2×3 factorial design. The population were all students of the 8 th class of SMP Negeri 6 Surakarta on academic year 2015/2016. The sample was taken using purposive sampling. The instruments used were learning independence questionnaire and mathematics learning outcomes test. The proposed hypothesis of the research were analyzed by using two-way analysis of variance. The conclusions of this research were as follow. (1) GI model provided better mathematics outcomes than direct learning model. (2) The high learning independence student had better mathematics learning outcomes than medium and low learning independence students, and the medium had as good as low learning independence students. (3) there was no interaction between learning models and learning independence on mathematics learning outcomes.


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 9
Author(s):  
Utin Desy Susiaty ◽  
Hodiyanto Hodiyanto

<p>The aims of this study is to find out: (1) a better learning model between contextual, realistic or conventional; (2) better learning outcomes between students with high, medium or low interpersonal intelligence; (3) better learning outcomes between students with high, medium or low interpersonal intelligence on each learning model; (4) a better learning model between contextual, realistic or conventional at each level of interpersonal intelligence. This research is using the experimental method. The sampling technique is cluster random sampling. Data collection tools used were questionnaires and tests. The data analysis technique used is the analysis of three-way variance with unequal cells. The results showed that: (1) contextual learning models are better than realistic but provide the same learning outcomes as conventional, while realistic and conventional learning outcomes are equally good; (2) students who have high, medium or low interpersonal intelligence have the same learning outcomes; (3) In each learning model, students with high, medium and low interpersonal intelligence have the same learning outcomes; (4) At each level of interpersonal intelligence, the contextual learning model is better than realistic and conventional.</p>


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dewi Mutia Anggraeni ◽  
Paridjo . ◽  
Eleonora Dwi W

Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan : (1) Untuk mengetahui apakah ada perbedaan prestasi belajar matematika antara peserta didik yang diajar dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry dan model pembelajaran Ekspositori.(2) Untuk mengetahui apakah prestasi belajar matematika peserta didik yang diajar model pembelajaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry lebih baik dari pada yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Ekspositori ditinjau dari kemandirian belajar tinggi.(3) Untuk mengetahui apakah prestasi belajar matematika peserta didik yang diajar menggunakan model pembeljaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry tidak lebih baik daripada yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Ekspositori ditinjau dari kemandirian belajar rendah. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah peserta didik kelas VII SMP Negeri 3 Brebes tahun pelajaran 2016/2017. Pengambilan sampel menggunakan teknik cluster random sampling. Sampel yang diambil sebanyak 2 kelas eksperimen, 2 kelas kontrol, dan 1 kelas ujicoba. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah tes, angket, dan dokumentasi. Teknik analisis data yang digunakan dengan menetapkan taraf signifikansi 5% adalah uji Anava dengan Rancangan Acak Kelompok, uji-t satu pihak kanan, dan uji-t satu pihak kiri, yang sebelumnya telah dilakukan uji prasyarat yaitu uji normalitas dan uji homogenitas. Dari hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan bahwa: (1) Ada perbedaan prestasi belajar matematika antara peserta didik yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry dengan model pembelajaran Ekspositori. (2) Prestasi belajar matematika peserta didik yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry lebih baik daripada yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Ekspositori ditinjau dari kemandirian belajar tinggi. (3) Prestasi belajar matematika peserta didik yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry tidak lebih baik atau sama dengan yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Ekspositori ditinjau dari kemandirian belajar rendah. Abstract: This study aims: (1) To find out whether there are differences in mathematics learning achievement between students taught by using Think Pair and Share learning models through the Inquiry Approach and Expository learning models. (2) To find out whether the mathematics learning achievements of students taught by the model Think Pair and Share learning through the Inquiry Approach is better than those taught using the Expository learning model in terms of high learning independence. (3) To find out whether the mathematics learning achievement of students taught using Think Pair and Share learning models through the Inquiry Approach is not better than those taught using the Expository learning model in terms of low learning independence. The population in this study were students of class VII of SMP Negeri 3 Brebes academic year 2016/2017. Sampling uses cluster random sampling technique. Samples taken were 2 experimental classes, 2 control classes, and 1 trial class. Data collection techniques used were tests, questionnaires, and documentation. The data analysis technique used by setting the 5% significance level is the Anova test with the Randomized Group Design, the right-hand t-test, and the left-hand t-test, which has previously been carried out prerequisite tests namely normality test and homogeneity test. From the results of the study it can be concluded that: (1) There are differences in mathematics learning achievement between students who are taught using Think Pair and Share learning models through the Inquiry Approach with the Expository learning model. (2) Mathematics learning achievement of students taught using Think Pair and Share learning models through the Inquiry Approach is better than those taught using the Expository learning model in terms of high learning independence. (3) Mathematics learning achievements of students taught using Think Pair and Share learning models through the Inquiry Approach are not better or the same as those taught using the Expository learning model in terms of low learningindependence. Keywords: ThinkPairandShare, InquiryApproach, Learning Independence, Mathematics Learning Achievement.


Author(s):  
Ismiyatin Ismiyatin

<p><em>The objective of this study was to improve student learning outcomes through the application of the Project Based Learning model. The type of research is classroom action research (CAR). The CAR model used was the C. Kemmis &amp; Mc Taggart spiral model which was carried out in 2 cycles. Data collection techniques are test techniques and non-test techniques. The research instrument using questions and observation sheets. The data analysis technique used is comparative descriptive. Based on the results of the study, it was shown that the cognitive domain of mathematics learning outcomes based on the percentage of completeness of pre-cycle, first and second cycle learning outcomes was 40.7%; 70.4%; 88.9%.</em></p>


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (7) ◽  
pp. 938
Author(s):  
Ririk Ajeng Alfianti ◽  
Blasius Suprapta ◽  
Endang Sri Andayani

<p class="Abstrak"><strong>Abstract:</strong> This research aims to determine the effect of interactive learning models on student cognitive learning outcomes, determine the effect of social skills on students 'cognitive learning outcomes, and determine the effect of interaction between interactive learning models and social skills on students' cognitive learning outcomes in history learning in high school. This research was a quasi-experimental with factorial design. The research samples were class X IPS 2 as an experimental class and class X IPS 3 as a control at SMAN 1 Gondanglegi. The research instruments were test, questionnaire, and learning implementation observation sheet. Data analysis technique was two-way ANOVA. The results of this research shows that there is is impact on the use of interactive learning models on student cognitive learning outcomes, there is impact of students' social skills on student cognitive learning outcomes, and there is impact of the interaction between interactive learning models and social skills on student cognitive learning outcomes.</p><strong>Abstrak: </strong>Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh model pembelajaran interaktif terhadap hasil belajar kognitif siswa, mengetahui pengaruh keterampilan sosial terhadap hasil belajar kognitif siswa, dan mengetahui pengaruh interaksi antara model pembelajaran interaktif dan keterampilan sosial terhadap hasil belajar kognitif siwa dalam pembelajaran sejarah di SMA. Bentuk penelitian ini adalah eksperimen semu dengan desain faktorial. Sampel penelitian adalah kelas X IPS 2 sebagai kelas eksperimen dan kelas X IPS 3 sebagai kelas kontrol di SMAN 1 Gondanglegi. Instrumen yang digunakan adalah tes, angket, dan lembar observasi keterlaksanaan pembelajaran. Teknik analisis data menggunakan anova dua jalur. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ada pengaruh penggunaan model pembelajaran interaktif terhadap hasil belajar kognitif siswa, ada pengaruh keterampilan sosial terhadap hasil belajar kognitif siswa dan ada pengaruh interaksi antara model pembelajaran interaktif dan keterampilan sosial terhadap hasil belajar kognitif siswa.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 89
Author(s):  
Sri Rochani

<em>This study aims to examine whether the actions of educators in using discovery learning models can improve concentration and mathematics learning outcomes in the material of transformation in class IX D of one of the junior high schools in Magelang. This research is a participant class action research. While the models used are the Stephen Kemmis and Robin McTaggart Model. The subjects of this study were students of class IX D of one of the junior high schools in Magelang in the academic year 2018/2019. This research consists of two cycles, namely cycle 1 and cycle 2. The material provided in this study is a transformation topic that includes translation, reflection, rotation, and dilation. Data on the concentration of mathematics learning are obtained using observation sheets. Data on mathematics learning outcomes were obtained using a theory test sheet. The data obtained were analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively. The results of the study show that: (1) learning using discovery learning  models can increase student learning concentration; (2) learning using discovery learning models can improve student learning outcomes; and (3) learning using discovery learning models can increase the concentration of learning and the learning outcomes of IX D students of junior high school.</em>


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Desi Tri Utami ◽  
Nuning Melianingsih

<p>This research aims to prove the effect of the Think Pair Share (TPS) cooperative learning model on students' mathematics learning achievement in terms of logical-mathematical intelligence. The research is a quasi-experimental study. The population of the research is all seventh grade students of State Junior High Schools in Sukoharjo Regency. The data analysis technique used is a two-way analysis of variance with unequal cells. The conclusions of the research are: (1) TPS learning model produces learning achievement better than conventional learning model; (2) there is no difference in mathematics learning achievement between students with high and average logical-mathematical intelligence, and students with average and low logical-mathematical intelligence; students with high logical-mathematical intelligence have better mathematics learning achievement than those with low logical-mathematical intelligence; (3) in the group of students with high, average, and low logical-mathematical intelligence, the use of conventional and TPS learning models produces equally good learning achievements; (4) in the group of students with high and low logical-mathematical intelligence, the use of conventional and TPS learning models produces equally good learning achievements; in the group of students with average logical-mathematical intelligence, the TPS learning model produces learning achievements better than conventional learning model</p>


JURNAL PESONA ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 85-95
Author(s):  
Rita Nilawijaya

AbstrakTujuan dalam penelitian ini adalah untuk mendeskripsikan kemampuan siswa kelas VIII SMP SATAP 48 OKU menulis puisi sebelum diterapkan model pembelajaran Concept Sentence, untuk mendeskripsikan kemampuan siswa kelas VIII SMP SATAP 48 OKU menulis puisi setelah diterapkan model pembelajaran Concept Sentence, dan mengetahui efektifitas model pembelajaran Concept Sentence terhadap pembelajaran menulis puisi siswa kelas VIII SMP SATAP 48 OKU. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode eksprimen. Teknik pengumpulan data adalah tes menulis puisi dan teknik analisis data adalah uji t. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dan pembahasan dapat disimpulkan bahwa hasil belajar siswa kelas VIII SMP SATAP 48 OKU setelah menggunakan model pembelajaran Concept Sentence lebih baik daripada sebelum menggunakan model pembelajaran Concept Sentence.Kata-kata kunci: Keefektifan,  concept sentence, menulis puisi. AbstractThe objectives in this study were to describe the ability of grade VIII students of SMP SATAP 48 OKU to write poetry before applying the Concept Sentence learning model, to describe the ability of grade VIII students of SMP SATAP 48 OKU to write poetry after the Concept Sentence learning model was applied, and know the effectiveness of the Concept Sentence learning model on learning to write poetry for eighth grade students of SMP SATAP 48 OKU. The method used in this research is the experimental method. The data collection technique is the poetry writing test and the data analysis technique is the t test. Based on the results of the research and discussion, it can be concluded that the learning outcomes of the eighth grade students of SMP SATAP 48 OKU after using the Concept Sentence learning model are better than before using the Concept Sentence learning model.             Key words: Effectiveness, concept sentence, writing poetry.


Author(s):  
Ana Setiani

This study was conducted based on low learning outcomes, especially in mathematics subjects and know the influence of Brain Based Learning model of learning toward mathematics learning. This research uses experimental method. The instrument used in this study is the instrument of mathematics learning results in the form of a description test, and the scale of attitudes containing statements of student attitudes toward learning mathematics. The data collected then dioal with rock SPSS 17.0 For Windows. Then proceed with the test of normality, homogeneity and equality of two averages using the t-test. Based on the results of data analysis obtained conclusion: (1) the results of learning mathematics students who use learning Brain Based Learning is better than conventional learning. (2) students are positive towards learning mathematics after using Brain Based Learning learning.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 158
Author(s):  
Arinatul Aniza ◽  
Tri Novita Irawati ◽  
Sholahudin Al-Ayubi

<p class="AfiliasiCxSpFirst" align="left"><strong>Abstrak:</strong></p><p class="AfiliasiCxSpMiddle">Pembelajaran berbasis <em>online</em> memiliki kendala yaitu siswa mengalami kesulitan belajar secara mandiri, salah satunya menunjukkan hasil belajar matematika yang tergolong rendah. Berpandangan pada kondisi tersebut memunculkan ide bagaimana cara mengajar matematika yang mudah dipahami siswa. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui efektivitas PRISMA LEKER WAIZ terhadap hasil belajar matematika siswa. Jenis penelitian ini merupakan penelitian asosiatif dengan pendekatan kuantitatif. Desain penelitian yang digunakan <em>one group pretest posttest design</em>. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan berupa tes dan dokumentasi. Adapun teknik analisis data meliputi beberapa tahapan diantaranya yaitu: uji validitas, uji reliabilitas, uji normalitas dan uji . Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa PRISMA LEKER WAIZ efektif terhadap hasil belajar matematika siswa. Dengan kata lain, PRISMA LEKER WAIZ dalam penelitian ini layak digunakan di masa pandemi karena media ini sudah dikembangkan sebelum penelitian, memiliki isi yang menarik (dilengkapi beragam bentuk latihan soal, kunci jawaban, desain menarik dan ringkasan materi), mudah diakses dalam pembelajaran <em>online</em> dan mudah dipahami siswa yaitu bisa mengerjakan soal matematika dengan baik menggunakan media ini.</p><p class="AfiliasiCxSpMiddle" align="left"> </p><p class="AfiliasiCxSpLast" align="left"><strong>Kata Kunci</strong>:</p><p>PRISMA LEKER WAIZ, Hasil Belajar</p><p> </p><p class="AfiliasiCxSpFirst" align="left"><strong><em>Abstract:</em></strong></p><p class="AfiliasiCxSpMiddle"><em>Online-based learning has problems, namely students have difficulty learning independently, one of which shows low mathematics learning outcomes. Looking at these conditions led to the idea of how to teach mathematics that is easy for students to understand. The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of PRISMA LEKER WAIZ on students' mathematics learning outcomes. This type of research is an associative research with a quantitative approach. The research design used was one group pretest posttest design. Data collection techniques used in the form of tests and documentation. The data analysis technique includes several stages including: validity test, reliability test, normality test and t test. The results showed that PRISMA LEKER WAIZ was effective on students' mathematics learning outcomes. In other words, PRISMA LEKER WAIZ in this study is suitable for use during the pandemic because this media was developed prior to the research, has interesting content (equipped with various forms of practice questions, answer keys, attractive designs and material summaries), is easily accessible in online learning and It is easy for students to understand, that is, they can do math problems well using this media.</em></p><p class="AfiliasiCxSpMiddle" align="left"><em> </em></p><p class="AfiliasiCxSpLast" align="left"><strong><em>Keywords</em></strong><em>:</em></p><p><em>PRISMA LEKER WAIZ</em><em>, Learning Outcomes</em></p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document