scholarly journals A Perspective on Patient Centricity in Health Ecosystem: A Call for an Enabling Culture

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
UBADA AQEEL ◽  
Shikha Gera
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Cultural Change ◽  
Real World ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Pharmaceutical Companies ◽  
Journal Articles ◽  
Secondary Sources ◽  
Smooth Flow ◽  
Practical Standpoint ◽  
Patient Centric

Today, patients are more empowered and informative than ever because of which the aim of the health ecosystem is to centre on the patient centred goals. The term patient centricity is no longer a health care buzzword; however, a lot needs to be done to implement this concept in the real world. Therefore, the objective of the current research is to bring in the importance of cultural change in the health ecosystem for the smooth flow of patient centricity. The current research is exploratory in nature that tried to explore the concept of patient centricity in the health ecosystem through literature and interviews. The research utilized secondary sources such as Journal articles, reports, and such others to draw how OCTAPACE culture is important in health ecosystem for promoting patient centricity. The eight strong pillars of OCTAPACE are Openness, Confrontation, Trust, Autonomy, Proactivity, Authenticity, Collaboration, and Experimentation and its relationship with patient centricity is proposed. The researchers can reasonably deduce that patient centricity requires a changed mindset and vision shared by all the stakeholders. For this, support from regulators, pharmaceutical companies, health care professionals etc. are required. The current research is among a few researches that highlights the importance of OCTAPACE culture in health ecosystem. This construct to meet patient centric goals is worthy of additional study. From the practical standpoint, training can be provided to all the employees of the entire health ecosystem to incorporate the OCTAPACE culture and to meet the demands of the patients and caregivers.

scholarly journals Being Heard, Exerting Influence, or Knowing How to Play the Game? Expectations of Client Involvement among Social and Health Care Professionals and Clients

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (16) ◽  
pp. 5653
Author(s):  
Elina Weiste ◽  
Sari Käpykangas ◽  
Lise-Lotte Uusitalo ◽  
Melisa Stevanovic
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Conversation Analysis ◽  
Cultural Change ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Health Care Services ◽  
Focus Group Research ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Significant Movement ◽  
Client Involvement ◽  
Actual Decision

Contemporary social and health care services exhibit a significant movement toward increasing client involvement in their own care and in the development of services. This major cultural change represents a marked shift in the client’s role from a passive patient to an active empowered agent. We draw on interaction-oriented focus group research and conversation analysis to study workshop conversations in which social and health care clients and professionals discussed “client involvement”. Our analysis focuses on the participants’ mutually congruent or discrepant views on the topic. The professionals and clients both saw client involvement as an ideal that should be promoted. Although both participant groups considered the clients’ experience of being heard a prerequisite of client involvement, the clients deviated from the professionals in that they also highlighted the need for actual decision-making power. However, when the professionals invoked the clients’ responsibility for their own treatment, the clients were not eager to agree with their view. In addition, in analyzing problems of client involvement during the clients’ and professionals’ meta-talk about client involvement, the paper also shows how the “client involvement” rhetoric itself may, paradoxically, sometimes serve to hinder here-and-now client involvement.

Supporting Siblings & Their Families During Intensive Baby Care

2008 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 64-64
Author(s):  
Linda Rector
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Hospital Setting ◽  
Family Centered Care ◽  
Journal Articles ◽  
Centered Care ◽  
Big Picture ◽  
Neonatal Problems ◽  
Family Centered

Most health care professionals who work with neonates in the hospital setting acknowledge the benefits of family-centered care. Textbooks and journal articles that focus on neonatal problems usually include a section on the importance of supporting parents through this stressful time. Strategies for including siblings in the NICU are found in a sidebar or in a few short paragraphs, as afterthoughts in the big picture of family-centered care.

scholarly journals Two visions of clinical integration: perspectives from health system leaders

2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenke Hwang ◽  
Joseph Andrie ◽  
Michelle LaClair ◽  
Harold Paz
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health System ◽  
Health Systems ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Success Factors ◽  
Leadership Roles ◽  
Health Care Environment ◽  
Clinical Integration ◽  
System Leaders ◽  
Patient Centric

Objective: Clinical Integration has been implicated as the key to achieving higher quality of care at a lower cost. However,ambiguity regarding the meaning of clinical integration poses challenges as health care professionals strive to adapt to the rapidlyevolving health care environment. This study aims to solicit insights from health system executives about what it means to beclinically integrated.Methods: The authors interviewed 13 health system executives from 11 different institutions in Pennsylvania ranging fromsmall community hospitals to large academic medical centers.Results: Two major viewpoints of clinical integration were identified from the interviews: patient-centric, which emphasized theimportance of the patient’s experience and strengthening patient involvement in their own healthcare, and provider-centric, whichfocused on leadership roles, organizational structure, and physician alignment. Participants with provider-centric viewpointswere associated with larger medical centers and were more likely to describe their health systems as highly clinically integrated.Conversely, patient-centric perspectives were affiliated with smaller health systems/hospitals and were more likely to describetheir health systems as less integrated. Participants also identified five key success factors of clinical integration: physicianalignment, shared data and analytics, culture, patient engagement, and an emphasis on primary care.Conclusions: Despite the central role of clinical integration in emerging health systems, there is not a shared understanding ofits definition. A better understanding of the varied perspectives regarding clinical integration can help current and future healthcare professionals to better communicate with one another about clinical integration and the practical steps necessary to achieveit.

Top 10 Things Every Radiologist Needs to Know About Intimate Partner Violence

2020 ◽  
pp. 084653712095654
Author(s):  
Paige Guyatt ◽  
Sofia Bzovsky ◽  
Mohit Bhandari ◽  
Sheila Sprague
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Intimate Partner Violence ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Partner Violence ◽  
Intimate Partner ◽  
Journal Articles ◽  
Injury Patterns ◽  
Effective Training ◽  
Nonfatal Injury ◽  
Key Questions

Introduction: Intimate partner violence (IPV) is considered to be the leading cause of nonfatal injury to women worldwide. Moreover, the need for effective training for health care professionals (HCPs) and protocol for addressing IPV in health care contexts are well-documented. This article addresses key questions that radiologists may have related to supporting patients who have experienced IPV. Methods: Peer-reviewed journal articles and other formal reports were located using Google Scholar and PubMed in order to assemble this review. Conclusions: Radiologists are well-equipped to help identify possible instances of IPV if they are aware of the injury patterns commonly associated with IPV. Along with other HCPs, radiologists can also advocate for the implementation of protocols that will guide their responses to victims of IPV within their own health care institution.

scholarly journals Health Care Professionals in the Digital Landscape in India

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (7) ◽  
pp. 30-36
Author(s):  
Arun Kumar S ◽  
Ankita Wadhwa ◽  
Amol Gramle
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Pharmaceutical Company ◽  
Mobile Phones ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Health Sector ◽  
Descriptive Statistics ◽  
Medical Community ◽  
Pharmaceutical Companies ◽  
Digital Channels ◽  
Digital Landscape

Internet has become essential to everyone during the Covid-19 pandemic lockdown as everything went to virtual. This has made the interactions between Pharmaceutical companies and Health Care Professionals (HCPs) explore digital channels as Medical Representatives (MRs) were not able to efficiently reach the HCPs. This pioneering study was conducted to evaluate the scope of digital channels and uncover insights into the digital behavioral landscape of HCPs to reach them effectively. A proctored, PAN India survey was conducted for health care professionals across diverse specialties and the responses were collected through in-clinic visits, mobile phones (via WhatsApp & SMS) and e-mails. 407 HCPs had actively participated in this survey from across the country. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the outcomes of this research which will help to develop programs directed at the HCPs in India to enhance their knowledge, medicine practice, HCP – patient & HCP – Pharmaceutical company interactions, engagement with the medical community and highlight the areas that they face challenges while accessing information online to better fit in this fast-growing digital landscape of the health sector. This will also cover insights to bridge both physical and digital interactions as ‘Phygital interactions’ that could be followed in the hopeful Post – Covid-19 scenario.

PP04 Co-Constructing Recommendations With Patients And Health Professionals

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (S1) ◽  
pp. 67-67
Author(s):  
Laurie Lambert ◽  
Lucy Boothroyd ◽  
Leila Azzi ◽  
Caroline Collette ◽  
Philippe Brouillard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
Real World ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Field Evaluation ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Multi Method Approach ◽  
Method Approach

Introduction:Decision-making about replacement or modification of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) must be patient-centered and clinically appropriate. We engaged both patients and health care professionals in a multi-method approach in order to recommend structures and processes that facilitate informed and shared decision-making.Methods:A systematic literature review (2000 to 2017) was performed focusing on the patient's perspective and the optimal organization of structures and processes for decision-making. A province-wide field evaluation based on medical chart review was carried out to provide ‘real world’ evidence in Québec's six ICD implanting centers (1 July to 31 December, 2016; N = 418). Patients and health care professionals reviewed the findings of the review and field evaluation, and deliberated recommendations in an anonymous manner by electronic mail. A joint meeting focused on proposed recommendations concerning shared decision-making.Results:The patients provided feedback on the literature review based on their ICD experience, and highlighted the need for better and more interactive decision aids, clinical information and time, and a private space for sensitive discussions. The field evaluation underlined the variability of treatment choices at the time of replacement and that more than one in ten patients had undergone ICD deactivation. Proposed recommendations focus on multi-disciplinary, integrated follow-up of patients and outline best practice for incorporating patient wishes and life objectives when discussing treatment options. The multi-round consultation process allowed both patients and professionals to co-construct recommendations with our evaluation team.Conclusions:This multi-method approach enriched our interpretation of literature and ‘real world’ data and facilitated identification and prioritization of important themes. Partnership with both patients and clinicians added a new and energizing dynamic to our evaluation and recommendation processes. We acknowledge the contribution of the members of the patient committee and the clinical experts committee.

Improving Communication Skills in Health Care

2013 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 109-117
Author(s):  
Lynda Katz Wilner ◽  
Marjorie Feinstein-Whittaker
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Communication Skills ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Skills Training ◽  
International Medical Graduate ◽  
Medical Graduate ◽  
Health Care Environment ◽  
Medical Interpreters ◽  
Accent Modification

Hospital reimbursements are linked to patient satisfaction surveys, which are directly related to interpersonal communication between provider and patient. In today’s health care environment, interactions are challenged by diversity — Limited English proficient (LEP) patients, medical interpreters, International Medical Graduate (IMG) physicians, nurses, and support staff. Accent modification training for health care professionals can improve patient satisfaction and reduce adverse events. Surveys were conducted with medical interpreters and trainers of medical interpreting programs to determine the existence and support for communication skills training, particularly accent modification, for interpreters and non-native English speaking medical professionals. Results of preliminary surveys suggest the need for these comprehensive services. 60.8% believed a heavy accent, poor diction, or a different dialect contributed to medical errors or miscommunication by a moderate to significant degree. Communication programs should also include cultural competency training to optimize patient care outcomes. Examples of strategies for training are included.

The Preschool Stuttering Screen for Health Care Professionals

2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 59-62
Author(s):  
Joseph Donaher ◽  
Christina Deery ◽  
Sarah Vogel
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Differential Diagnosis ◽  
Preschool Children ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Developmental Profile

Healthcare professionals require a thorough understanding of stuttering since they frequently play an important role in the identification and differential diagnosis of stuttering for preschool children. This paper introduces The Preschool Stuttering Screen for Healthcare Professionals (PSSHP) which highlights risk factors identified in the literature as being associated with persistent stuttering. By integrating the results of the checklist with a child’s developmental profile, healthcare professionals can make better-informed, evidence-based decisions for their patients.

Percutaneous Tracheostomy: A Multidisciplinary Approach

2008 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 87-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vinciya Pandian ◽  
Thai Tran Nguyen ◽  
Marek Mirski ◽  
Nasir Islam Bhatti
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Quality Assurance ◽  
Data Collection ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Multidisciplinary Approach ◽  
Percutaneous Tracheostomy ◽  
Johns Hopkins Hospital ◽  
Prospective Data ◽  
Comprehensive Service ◽  
Over Time

Abstract The techniques of performing a tracheostomy has transformed over time. Percutaneous tracheostomy is gaining popularity over open tracheostomy given its advantages and as a result the number of bedside tracheostomies has increased necessitating the need for a Percutaneous Tracheostomy Program. The Percutaneous Tracheostomy Program at the Johns Hopkins Hospital is a comprehensive service that provides care to patients before, during, and after a tracheostomy with a multidisciplinary approach aimed at decreasing complications. Education is provided to patients, families, and health-care professionals who are involved in the management of a tracheostomy. Ongoing prospective data collection serves as a tool for Quality Assurance.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document