scholarly journals Graham Patch Versus Modified Graham Patch in the Management of Perforated Duodenal Ulcer

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roman Kidwai ◽  
Meraj Alam Ansari
Keyword(s):  
Duodenal Ulcer ◽  
Peptic Ulcer ◽  
Patch Repair ◽  
P Value ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Ulcer Perforation ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Graham Patch ◽  
Group B ◽  
Duodenal Ulcer Perforation

Introduction: Peptic ulcer perforation is a serious complication which affects 2-10% of peptic ulcer patients. It presents with an overall mortality of 10% although various authors had reported incidence between 1.3% and 20%. Being a life threatening complication of peptic ulcer disease, it needs special attention with prompt resuscitation and appropriate surgical management if morbidity and mortality are to be contained. Aims and objectives: To compare outcome and complications in Graham patch and Modified Graham patch repair in perforated duodenal ulcer.Material and Methods: A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted to compare the outcome and complication viz. leakage, obstruction after Graham's patch repair and modified Graham's patch repair undergoing duodenal ulcer perforation in various surgical units of Nepalgunj Medical College Teaching Hospital. Out of these 60 patients; one group (30 cases) underwent Graham's patch repair and another group (30 cases) underwent modified Graham's patch repair. The outcome of procedure was measured in terms of complication like leakage, obstruction and mortality.Results: Duodenal ulcer perforation in group A was more common in male; 58(96.66%) patients were male 2 (3.33%) were female (M:F=29:1). The mean age was 46.80(SD 13.9) years. In Group B it was more common in male; 58(96.66%) patients were male 2(3.33%) were female (M:F=29:1). The mean age was 48.60(SD 14.04) years. Incidence of complication was more common in Group B, no statistically significant difference was found between two groups. The incidence of post operative leakage was 1(3.33%) and in Group B were 2(6.70%). The chi square test was used to compute the p value using SPSS 19. The chi square p value was calculated as 0.554. Hence there was no significant difference between the Group A and Group B. The incidence of burst abdomen was same 2(6.70%) in both the groups.Conclusion: The analysis of results of present study consisting of altogether 60 patients undergoing duodenal ulcer perforation repair showed that Graham's patch repair is as effective as modified Graham's patch repair in terms of morbidity and mortality. Hence there is no statistically significant difference in undergoing either procedure of repair. It is concluded that either procedure can be undertaken depending upon surgeon preference.Journal of Nepalgunj Medical College Vol.13(1) 2015: 28-31

Combination Therapy Of Tadalafil And Pentoxifylline In Severe Erectile Dysfunction; A Prospective Randomized Trial

2015 ◽  
Vol 87 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Santosh Kumar ◽  
Rajesh Roat ◽  
Swati Agrawal ◽  
Kumar Jayant ◽  
Ravimohan S. Mavuduru ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Erectile Dysfunction ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Erectile Function ◽  
T Test ◽  
P Value ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Chi Square Test ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Abstractwas to assess efficacy of Tadalafil alone versus Tadalafil plus Pentoxifylline in the treatment of erectile dysfunction by using self administered IIEF-5 questionnaire.Two hundred and thirty seven patients presenting with ED at andrology OPD were evaluated for ED by a self administered IIEF (International Index of Erectile Function) questionnaire. Patients were systematically randomized by computer generated random table into two groups groups namely, group A: Tadalafil only group, group B: combination of Tadalafil + Pentoxifyl-line. All the patients were re-assessed by IIEF-5 questionnaire after 8 weeks of medical therapy. Statistical analysis was performed using student’s unpaired t-test, paired t-test, chi square test. p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.Two hundred and thirty seven patients were included in the present study, in group A: 92 patients (78.6%) showed improvement in their IIEF score after 8 weeks of tadalafil treatment. While in group B, overall 104 patients(86.6%) showed improvement after combination of Tadalafil and Pentoxifylline. There was a statistically significant difference of percentage change in IIEF score was seen in group B (group A 90.7±15.2%, group B 95.6±13.4%; p value – 0.014). We found this difference even more statistically significant in patients with severe ED (group A 72.7±47.2%, group B 132.3±54.3%; p value – 0.000). There was no significant difference in between the two groups with regards to occur-rence of side effects.Both tadalafil and combination of Tadalafil + Pentoxifylline improve erectile function in patients of ED. Patients with severe ED showed much significant improvement in erectile function with combination therapy.

scholarly journals Clinical Study on Patients with Duodenal Perforation

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-74
Author(s):  
S P Rajan ◽  
Sudheer UK ◽  
Sreejith ◽  
Dinesh Babu M V
Keyword(s):  
Duodenal Ulcer ◽  
Peptic Ulcer ◽  
Clinical Study ◽  
Wound Complication ◽  
Duodenal Perforation ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Male Predominance ◽  
Ulcer Perforation ◽  
Duodenal Perforations ◽  
Duodenal Ulcer Perforation

Background: Perforations of peptic ulcer are third in frequencies, acute appendicitis and acute intestinal obstruction being more common. Prompt recognition of the condition is very important and only by early diagnosis and treatment it is possible to reduce the still relatively    high mortality. The aim of this study was to review and study the factors influencing, the outcome of the duodenal perforations. Subjects and Methods: A clinical study was conducted in 50 cases of diagnosed duodenal ulcer perforation that was established by the admitting surgeon, based on clinical features and supposed by radiological evidence and confined at operation. This study comprises of 50 cases of duodenal ulcer perforation admitted in period from January 2017 to January 2020. Results: In present study, out of total 50 patients with duodenal ulcer 46(92%) males and 5(8%) females, with male predominance. Highest incidence was found between 41-50 years followed by 21-29 years. Most of the patients admitted by 12-24 hours, common site of ulcer is prepyloric in presentation. Duodenal ulcer perforations were single perforation, while two cases of ileal perforations were multiple. Smoking is main predisposing cause of ulcer. ARDS were 14% (7 patients) and it was observed that 32 percent (16 patients) having wound complication, 2 percent (‘1 patient) having mortality and 46% (23 patients) have no complications. In this present study, 60% of patients had h/o Peptic ulcer. On X- ray, 90% of patients had finding of air under diaphragm. Conclusion: The mortality in perforated duodenal ulcer has been reduced owing to early approach to hospital, diagnosis, prompt surgical treatment and appropriate and adequate antibiotics. Smoking and alcohol consumption and life style modification may reduce morbidity and mortality in patients with duodenal perforation.

scholarly journals A clinical study of factors affecting the prognosis in duodenal ulcer perforation cases in tertiary care hospital, Kanchipuram district

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (12) ◽  
pp. 4290
Author(s):  
Dhinesh Babu K. ◽  
M. Bhaskar
Keyword(s):  
Duodenal Ulcer ◽  
Peptic Ulcer ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Peptic Ulcer Perforation ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Chronic Alcoholic ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Ulcer Disease ◽  
Ulcer Perforation ◽  
Duodenal Ulcer Perforation

Background: Peptic ulcer disease is an erosion of the lining of the stomach or duodenum. It is associated with potentially life-threatening complications such as bleeding, perforation and obstruction. The main predisposing factors for peptic ulcer perforation are smoking, use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), chronic stress, Helicobacter pylori infection, and age >60 years. In recent years, with introduction of proton pump inhibitors and increased knowledge of duodenal ulcer perforation (DUP) has decreased the incidence of DUP.Methods: 50 patients with DUP were studied prospectively with respect to age, gender, use of NSAIDs, morbidity, mortality and complications.Results: Out of 50 patients, the mean age of incidence DUP was 46 yrs, which is more common in males. And also 48% patients were chronic alcoholic and 52% patients were chronic smokers. Moreover, 14% patients were chronic NSAIDs users.Conclusions: Factors such as age, gender, use of NSAID, Alcohol and smoking affects the life expectancy of the patients, which leads to morbidity and mortality.

scholarly journals Comparative study of laparoscopic cholecystectomy with and without drains

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. 2633
Author(s):  
Dharamdev D. ◽  
Rupa Merlyn Mascarenhas ◽  
Anand Bhandary
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Bile Leak ◽  
P Value ◽  
Analog Scale ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Single Blind ◽  
Complete History

Background: Gallstones and cholecystitis are very common pathologies in surgical practice. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the preferred procedure to remove the gallbladder (GB) worldwide. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the merits and demerits of placing drain after LC and to find out the clinico-pathologic conditions in which the placement of drain was justifiable.Methods: 100 patients who underwent LC were divided into 2 groups, group A (patients with drain) and group B (patients without drain). Interventional type, single-blind study was done. Complete history, evaluation and relevant data of both groups were done and analysed using descriptive statistics and Chi square test.Results: In group A, 44% were males and 56% females whereas in group B, 42% were males and 58% were females. There was a statistically significant difference (p value<0.05) between 2 groups in Visual analog scale (VAS) grading. Wound infection was seen in 14% in group A and 02% in group B; mean hospital stay in group A was 8.38±1.86 days and in group B was 4.68±1.25 days. Nausea and vomiting were noted in 46% among group A and 04 % among group B.Conclusions: Placement of drain after LC has nothing to offer, in contrast, it was associated with more pain. It would be reasonable to leave a drain if there was worry about an unsolved or potential bile leak only.

A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Webinar on Knowledge Regarding the Strategies to Prevent Covid 19 among Nursing Students of SIIHS, Honavar, Uttara Kannada

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sagaya Arockiya Mary. A ◽  
Susai Mari.A ◽  
Wincy. C ◽  
Thirumurugan. M ◽  
Verginia Dsouza ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Students ◽  
Student Nurses ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Knowledge Score ◽  
P Value ◽  
Sufficient Information ◽  
Knowledge Level ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Post Test

Background: The one virus stumbled the whole universe is the novel corona virus and impacted physical, emotional and social health status of almost every individual in the world irrespectively. Since the existence of Covid-19 till now it is been noticed that student nurses also affected by this fatal viral infection during their clinical practice. Objectives: The study focused on evaluating the effectiveness of webinar on knowledge regarding the strategies to prevent Covid -19 among student nurses of SIIHS, Honavar, Uttara Kannada. The study aimed at enhancing the knowledge level and influences others through effective health teaching at clinical areas and even in community settings. Methodology: An evaluative approach with pre- experimental, non-randomized, one group pre and post-test research design was adapted. The sample size was 294, purposive sampling technique was adapted. Data collected through testmoz web page and webinar was conducted by google meet app for one week. Data analysed by descriptive and statistical methods (chi-square and z-test) and interpreted by graphs. Results: The findings show that in pre-test 10(3.41%) had poor, 127(43.19%) had average, 157(53.40%) Good and 00% excellent knowledge level whereas in post-test 00% had Poor, 59(20.06%) Average, 176(59.86%) Good and 59 (20.06%) had excellent knowledge level. The pre-test mean score was 23.1 (46.2 %.) and of post-test was 35.6 (71.2%). The computed z’-test value showing significant difference in the pre (x?1=23.1) and post-test (x?2=35.6) knowledge score (p=1.18357, < z= -5.1679, critical z score=-1.6449 ? =0.05 level of significance). Hence the p value is greater than the z value (p(x?Z) = 1.18357e-7), it indicates the webinar was effective and the null hypothesis (H0) is rejected. Conclusion: The study was concluded as the webinar was highly effective and influenced the participant to gain sufficient information on prevention and the spread of Covid 19. Hopefully this enables them to apply

A Comparative Study between Ketamine and Lidocaine ro Decrease Propofol Injection Pain During Induction of Anesthesia

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1304-1309
Author(s):  
Bikash Khadka ◽  
Nil Raj Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Venous Occlusion ◽  
Verbal Response ◽  
Injection Pain ◽  
P Value ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Lidocaine Group ◽  
Mild Pain ◽  
Significant Difference

Introduction: Pain during the injection of anesthetic agents may be distressing and can reduce the acceptability of an otherwise useful agent such as propofol during daycare surgeries. Lidocaine and ketamine both are used as pre-treatment to decrease propofol induced pain. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of ketamine injection to decrease propofol-induced pain in comparison to lidocaine injection. Methodology: This is a prospective cross-sectional comparative study. Eighty-nine cases were divided into two groups where group K received ketamine 2 ml (0.2 mg/kg) whereas group L received lidocaine 2% 2ml (0.5 mg/kg) after venous occlusion with rubber tourniquet. One-fourth dose of propofol was injected 1 min after release of tourniquet and pain accessed at 0, 1, and 2 minutes of propofol injection with a verbal response and behavioral signs. Chi-square test and paired T-test were used and a p-value less than 0.05 was considered significant. Result: Regarding hemodynamic, oxygenation, and adverse effects there was no significant difference. Immediately after propofol injection, only 1 patient of the ketamine group had mild pain (2.22%) while 12 patients from the lignocaine group had mild pain (27.27%) with a p-value of 0.009. Also after 2 minutes of propofol injection, only 12 cases had mild pain i.e. 13.48% (1 from ketamine group i.e. 2.22% and 11 from lidocaine group i.e. 25%) with p-value of 0.002. Conclusion: Our study helps prove low-dose ketamine is more effective in reducing the incidence and severity of pain on injection of propofol in comparison to Lidocaine with better hemodynamic stability. 

Study of factors affecting mortality and morbidity in patients presenting with peritonitis due to duodenal ulcer perforation

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 35-39
Author(s):  
Pradeep Chandra Sharma ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Duodenal Ulcer ◽  
Previous History ◽  
Common Factors ◽  
Duodenal Perforation ◽  
High Morbidity ◽  
Delayed Presentation ◽  
Mortality And Morbidity ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Ulcer Perforation ◽  
Duodenal Ulcer Perforation

Background: Peptic ulcer disease in the general population had lifetime prevalence of 5-10% with incidence of 0.1–0.3% per year. Despite the tremendous improvement in preventive therapies, the rate of complication of this disease is still high and is burdened by high morbidity and mortality. In present study, we aimed to study factors affecting mortality and morbidity in patients presenting with peritonitis due to duodenal ulcer perforation at our tertiary hospital. Material and Methods: Present study was single-center, prospective, observational study conducted in patients admitted, diagnosed with duodenal ulcer perforation and surgically treated at our hospital. Results: In present study period total 56 patients were studied. All were male, most common age group was 51-60 years (37.5%) followed by 41-50 years (23.21%). Duration from onset of symptoms to admission was >24 hours (30.36%) in most of patients followed by 12-24 hours (28.57%). Most commons symptoms were pain in abdomen (100%), vomiting (100%). Anaemia (37.5%), LRTI and Pulmonary complications (19.64%), Diabetes mellitus (12.5%) and Hypertension (10.71%) were common comorbidities noted. Associated risk factors were previous history of PUD (41.07%), Alcohol use (64.29%), Cigarette smoking (51.79%) and Use of NSAIDs (12.5%). Presence of free gas under diaphragm was noted in 83.93% patients. Intraoperatively duodenal perforation diameter was 1–5 mm (60.71%) in most of patients followed by 6–10 mm (23.21%). Only 1 patient had duodenal perforation diameter was > 20mm. Common postoperative complications were wound infection (37.5%) and pulmonary infection (21.43%). In present study mortality within 1 month was noted in 13 patients (23.21%). Most common factors related to mortality were delayed presentation > 24 hours (61.54%), age > 60 years (46.15%), diabetes mellites (38.46%), Size of perforation > 1 cm (38.46%) and septicaemic shock (23.08%). Conclusion: Delayed presentation > 24 hours, age > 60 years size of perforation > 1 cm were common factors related to mortality in duodenal ulcer perforation patients.

Resorbable Collagen Barrier Impeding the Extrusion of Obturating Material in Primary Molars Undergoing Resorption – A Randomized Clinical Trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 45 (5) ◽  
pp. 312-316
Author(s):  
Mishra Neha Sanjeev ◽  
Harsimran Kaur ◽  
Sandeep Singh Mayall ◽  
Rishika ◽  
Ramakrishna Yeluri
Keyword(s):  
Test Group ◽  
Primary Molars ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Chi Square Test ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
And Control

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of placing a resorbable collagen barrier in impeding the extrusion of obturation material in primary molars undergoing resorption. Study design: All the 94 canals in 47 mandibular molars were allocated to 2 groups- Group ‘A’- 47 canals with collagen barrier (Test group) and Group ‘B’- 47 canals without collagen barrier (Control group) based on randomization protocol. Pulpectomy was performed and obturation of both test and control canals were radiographically assessed. Pearson’s chi – square test was applied to analyze the results. The significance level was predetermined at p &lt; 0.05. Results: Among the test group, 93.6% of the canals showed no extrusion while, 6.4% showed visible extrusion of the material outside the apex. In the control group, 83% showed no extrusion whereas 17% of the canals showed visible extrusion outside the apex. But no significant difference was noted (p&gt;0.05). Conclusion: The placement of resorbable collagen barrier in the apical third of the canal prevented the extrusion of obturating material beyond the apex in resorbing primary molars.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document