scholarly journals Perception of understanding COVID-19 among doctors at Patan Hospital, Nepal

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bimal Pandey ◽  
Mipsang Lama ◽  
Prashant Kumar Shah ◽  
Piyush Rajbhandari ◽  
Keshav Sigdel ◽  
...  

Introduction: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an infectious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and presents with fever, dry cough, fatigue, myalgia, and dyspnea. This study aims to is find out the understanding of COVID-19 among doctors at Patan Hospital.  Method: A cross sectional was conducted among doctors at Patan Hospital, Patan Academy of Health Sciences, Nepal. The questionnaire in Google form consisted, part1 perception on COVID-19 and part2 understanding using multiple choice questions corresponding to the one to fifteen questionnaire in part1. Ethnical approval was obtained. Result: Sixty-one doctors participated in the study, of which 65.5% were directly involved in management of COVID-19. Perception and understanding regarding transmission status in country was 65.6% and 63.95% respectively, about case definition 90.1% and 62.2%, about when to do diagnostic tests 75.4% and 90.2%. Conclusion: There was difference in perception and understanding regarding COVID-19 among doctors, and areas to be reinforced were case definition, transmission classification, diagnostic tests.

Author(s):  
Ajeet Kumar Khilnani ◽  
Rekha Thaddanee ◽  
Gurudas Khilnani

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> Multiple choice questions (MCQs) are routinely used for formative and summative assessment in medical education. Item analysis is a process of post validation of MCQ tests, whereby items are analyzed for difficulty index, discrimination index and distractor efficiency, to obtain a range of items of varying difficulty and discrimination indices. This study was done to understand the process of item analysis and analyze MCQ test so that a valid and reliable MCQ bank in otorhinolaryngology is developed.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> 158 students of 7<sup>th</sup> Semester were given an 8 item MCQ test. Based on the marks achieved, the high achievers (top 33%, 52 students) and low achievers (bottom 33%, 52 students) were included in the study. The responses were tabulated in Microsoft Excel Sheet and analyzed for difficulty index, discrimination index and distractor efficiency.  </p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> The mean (SD) difficulty index (Diff-I) of 8 item test was 61.41% (11.81%). 5 items had a very good difficulty index (41% to 60%), while 3 items were easy (Diff-I &gt;60%). There was no item with Diff-I &lt;30%, i.e. a difficult item, in this test. The mean (SD) discrimination index (DI) of the test was 0.48 (0.15), and all items had very good discrimination indices of more than 0.25. Out of 24 distractors, 6 (25%) were non-functional distractors (NFDs). The mean (SD) distractor efficiency (DE) of the test was 74.62% (23.79%).</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Item analysis should be an integral and regular activity in each department so that a valid and reliable MCQ question bank is developed.</p>


2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (05) ◽  
pp. 597-603
Author(s):  
Fatima MUKHTAR ◽  
NOREEN HASHMI ◽  
MUHAMMAD ALI RAUF ◽  
Amna Anzar ◽  
Khurram Islam Butt ◽  
...  

Objective: To determine preferences of medical students for modes of teaching, qualities of a good teacher and assessmenttechniques in medical education. Design: A descriptive cross-sectional study. Setting: Lahore Medical and Dental College, Lahore. Period:January 2011. Material & Methods: All students of third and fourth year MBBS classes were included in the study (n=127). A pre-testedquestionnaire was used for data collection. A 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1(strongly disagree) to 7(strongly agree) was used to determinestudent’s preferences of teaching styles. The data was recorded using SPSS version 16.0. Descriptive statistics were computed. Results: Thepreferred teaching methods for basic science subjects were skills laboratory 88(70%), followed by problem based learning 70(55%) andinteractive lectures 65(51%). The same teaching methods i.e. skills laboratory 101(80%), problem based learning 89(70%) and interactivelectures 79(62%) were also popular for the teaching of clinical science subjects. The least preferred teaching method for both basic 51(40%)and clinical 58(46%) sciences was didactic lectures. The desirable quality of a good teacher was reported as teaching skills 111(87%) and thepreferred assessment technique was found to be multiple choice questions 90(71%). Conclusions: Students prefer the student centredteaching styles as opposed to the traditional approach. Good teaching skill is the most desirable quality of a teacher and most students like to beassessed by multiple choice questions.


2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (01) ◽  
pp. 57-61
Author(s):  
Saeed Ahmed ◽  
Nabeel Qamar ◽  
Naveed Mansoori ◽  
Sajila Bano

Objectives: To find out the students perception on using multiple choice questions as a classroom assessment technique. Study Design: Cross sectional Study. Setting: University of Hail, Saudi Arabia. Period: 6 months from January 2018 to June 2018. Material & Methods: At the end of each scheduled class, students are provided with four MCQ's on the same topic which was delivered in the lecture and 3 minutes were given to solve the MCQ’s. Data was collected from 4th and 6th year MBBS students. A self-structured questionnaire regarding class assessment techniques was also administered, after completion of Surgery and Clinical Skill module. Results: Out of 80 MBBS students, 50% were selected from 4th year and 6th year respectively. Response of most of the students were positive 59 (73.8%) in classroom assessment techniques effects on student discipline. Majority of the student’s 70 (87.5%) respond positive effects on student’s interest to subject and 64 (80%) reported positive effects on student’s assessment. Suggestion about participating classroom assessment technique were found to be positive in 61 (76.2%). Data was analysed by using SPSS version 20.  Conclusion: Student’s perception on using multiple choice questions as a classroom assessment technique was found to be more positive.


Author(s):  
Amit P. Date ◽  
Archana S. Borkar ◽  
Rupesh T. Badwaik ◽  
Riaz A. Siddiqui ◽  
Tanaji R. Shende ◽  
...  

Background: Multiple choice questions (MCQs) are a common method for formative and summative assessment of medical students. Item analysis enables identifying good MCQs based on difficulty index (DIF I), discrimination index (DI), distracter efficiency (DE). The objective of this study was to assess the quality of MCQs currently in use in pharmacology by item analysis and develop a MCQ bank with quality items.Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in 148 second year MBBS students at NKP Salve institute of medical sciences from January 2018 to August 2018. Forty MCQs twenty each from the two term examination of pharmacology were taken for item analysis A correct response to an item was awarded one mark and each incorrect response was awarded zero. Each item was analyzed using Microsoft excel sheet for three parameters such as DIF I, DI, and DE.Results: In present study mean and standard deviation (SD) for Difficulty index (%) Discrimination index (%) and Distractor efficiency (%) were 64.54±19.63, 0.26±0.16 and 66.54±34.59 respectively. Out of 40 items large number of MCQs has acceptable level of DIF (70%) and good in discriminating higher and lower ability students DI (77.5%). Distractor efficiency related to presence of zero or 1 non-functional distrator (NFD) is 80%.Conclusions: The study showed that item analysis is a valid tool to identify quality items which regularly incorporated can help to develop a very useful, valid and a reliable question bank.


2021 ◽  
Vol 71 (4) ◽  
pp. 1152-56
Author(s):  
Khalid Mahmood ◽  
Asad Shamim ◽  
Muhammad Umair Khan ◽  
Tasneem Alam ◽  
Usman Khalid ◽  
...  

Objective: To ascertain the various aspects directing the undergraduates at Quetta Institute of medical sciences towards anesthesiology as future profession/specialization. Study Design: Cross sectional study. Place and Duration of Study: Quetta Institute of Medical Sciences, Quetta Pakistan, from Mar to Apr 2019. Methodology: Study was conducted among final year medical students with the help of a printed questionnaire consisting of 15 Multiple Choice Questions. The questionnaire provided the required database to explore various factors that influence undergraduates to select their future specialization based on demography and specialty preferences. Results: A total of 65 undergraduates completed the response sheet. While 45 (68.8%) participants were females and 20 (31.2%) were males, 62 (95.4%) were single (unmarried or divorced) and had no children 63 (96.9%). Medicine proved to be the most favourate specialty with 20 (31.4%) student opting for it whereas anesthesiology was chosen by 4 (6.1%) students. Conclusion: Anesthesiology still remains a less popular choice among the medical students of Pakistan particularly Quetta Institute of Medical Sciences due to multifaceted factors. Inferior prestige of the specialty was the most significant factor in deciding against anaesthesiology.


2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Siti Khadijah Adam ◽  
Faridah Idris ◽  
Puteri Shanaz Jahn Kassim ◽  
Nor Fadhlina Zakaria ◽  
Rafidah Hod

Background: Multiple-choice questions (MCQs) are used for measuring the student’s progress, and they should be analyzed properly to guarantee the item’s appropriateness. The analysis usually determines three indices of an item; difficulty or passing index (PI), discrimination index (DI), and distractor efficiency (DE). Objectives: This study was aimed to analyze the multiple-choice questions in the preclinical and clinical examinations with different numbers of options in medical program of Universiti Putra Malaysia. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study. Forty multiple-choice questions with four options from the preclinical examination and 80 multiple-choice questions with five options from the clinical examination in 2017 and 2018 were analyzed using optical mark recognition machine and Ms. Excel. The parameters included PI, DI, and DE. Results: The average difficulty level of multiple-choice questions for preclinical and clinical phase examinations were similar in 2017 and 2018 that were considered ‘acceptable’ and ‘ideal’ ranged from 0.55 to 0.60, respectively. The average DIs were similar in all examinations that were considered ‘good’ (ranged from 0.25 to 0.31) except in 2018 clinical phase examination that showed ‘poor’ items (DI = 0.20 ± 0.11). The questions for preclinical phase showed an increase in the number of ‘excellent’ and ‘good’ items in 2018 from 37.5% to 70.0%. There was an increase of 10.0% for preclinical phase, and 6.25% for clinical phase, in the number of items with no non-functioning distractors in 2018. Among all, preclinical multiple-choice questions in 2018 showed the highest mean of DE (71.67%). Conclusions: Our findings suggested that there was an improvement in the questions from preclinical phase while more training on questions preparation and continuous feedback should be given to clinical phase teachers. A higher number of options did not affect the level of difficulty of a question; however, the discrimination power and distractors efficiency might differ.


Author(s):  
Ramzi Shawahna ◽  
Mohammed Al-Rjoub ◽  
Mohammed M Al-Horoub ◽  
Wasif Al-Hroub ◽  
Bisan Al-Rjoub ◽  
...  

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate community pharmacists’ knowledge and certainty of adverse effects and contraindications of pharmaceutical products to estimate the risk of error. Factors influencing their knowledge and certainty were also investigated. Methods: The knowledge of community pharmacists was assessed in a cross-sectional design using a multiple-choice questions test on the adverse effects and contraindications of active pharmaceutical ingredients and excipients from May 2014 to March 2015. Self-rated certainty scores were also recorded for each question. Knowledge and certainty scores were combined to estimate the risk of error. Results: Out of 315 subjects, 129 community pharmacists (41.0%) completed the 30 multiple-choice questions test on active ingredients and excipients. Knowledge on active ingredients was associated with the year of graduation and obtaining a licence to practice pharmacy. Knowledge on excipients was associated with the degree obtained. There was higher risk of error in items on excipients than those on ingredients (P< 0.01). Conclusion: The knowledge of community pharmacists in Palestine was insufficient with high risk of errors. Knowledge of community pharmacists on the safety issues of active ingredients and excipients need to be improved.


Children ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. 769
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Fabio Parisi ◽  
Lucia Diaferio ◽  
Giulia Brindisi ◽  
Cristiana Indolfi ◽  
Giuseppina Rosaria Umano ◽  
...  

The persistence of symptoms after recovery from Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) is defined as long COVID, an entity that had occurred among adults but which is not yet well characterized in pediatric ages. The purpose of this work was to present some of the data from a survey addressed to Italian pediatricians concerning the impact of long-COVID among children who recovered from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. The questionnaire was designed and pre-tested in February 2021 by a working group of experts from the Italian Pediatric Society for Allergy and Immunology (SIAIP). The survey was emailed once in March 2021 to a sample of Italian pediatricians. A total 267 Italian pediatricians participated in our survey. According to most pediatricians (97.3%), the persistence of symptoms is found in less than 20% of children. Specifically, with regard to the symptoms that persist even after swab negativization, fatigue was the most mentioned one (75.6%). Long-COVID would seem to be a phenomenon of limited occurrence in pediatric ages, affecting less than 20% of children. Among all of the symptoms, the one that was most prevalent was fatigue, a pathological entity that is associated with many viral diseases.


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4752-4752
Author(s):  
Beatrice Manghisi ◽  
Lorenza Maria Borin ◽  
maria Rosaria Monaco ◽  
Raffaele Mantegazza ◽  
Carlo Gambacorti-Passerini

Abstract Introduction The diagnosis of a hematological neoplastic disease (HND) bears a great impact on the patient family, which suffers abrupt changes in living patterns because of prognosis, prolonged hospitalization and therapy related adverse events. Parents often believe that the best way to protect their children from suffering is to avoid communications about the disease, as "they wouldn't understand". Many hospitals offer family support, usually managed by psychologists; we hypothesized that the hematologist can play a key role in this process, being the one who primarily takes care of the patient, possesses the scientific skills necessary to explain the disease and is viewed by the family members as the key player. Since 2010, patients admitted to the Hematology Division at San Gerardo Hospital in Monza - Italy, who have minors in their family can participate in the "Emanuela Project" (see below). Methods The aim of this pilot study is to evaluate the impact of this intervention on children health status as perceived by their parents either affected or unaffected by HND. Ten hospitalized patients with a HND disease diagnosed between November 2017 and May 2018, with at least one child aged 0-18 years were recruited after signing an informed consent. Intervention: children can visit their parents in a dedicated hospital room in the days after diagnosis and an informal talk with a hematologist and a psychologist is organized; the hematologist, using simple images and metaphors (e.g. "flowered garden" to represent the normal bone marrow), explains the illness and answers questions, while the psychologist helps children to express emotions about the situation. A questionnaire, administered 30-60 days after the intervention to all parents, explores their perceptions about changes in each child; itconsists of 18 multiple choice questions and 15 open questions. Data were analyzed with statistical software STATA. Open questions were fully read and interpreted by authors; T-LAB software was used to evaluate relevant recurring words . Results All 10 patients that were offered the intervention consented to it; 9 out of 10 patients have returned their questionnaires by July 2018 Five of them were fathers (55.56%) and 4 mothers (44.44%), with a mean age 50.22+/- 9.19 (SD). Diagnoses were Acute Leukemia (5), Lymphoma (2) and Multiple Myeloma (2). Mean duration of hospital stay was 26.2 days (+/- 12.8 SD) . The study included 16 children, aged 4 to 18 (mean 10 +/- 5 SD). We analyzed 28 questionnaires. Data from multiple choice questions exploring changes in children behavior suggest that, according to both parents there was no substantial worsening in school performance, appetite, sleep patterns (see table 1). These findings suggest that talking to children about the disease didn't traumatize them, and gave some concrete and reassuring answers to unexpressed fears. An interesting finding is that 44% of children increased their need to be in contact with the ill parent, showing a strengthening of relationships inside the family. One relevant finding concerns the possibility to talk about HND inside the family: 93% of parents gave a score of 3 (=often) or 4(=always) to this question. 100% of parents stated that it was never necessary to keep clinic visits or hospital admissions hidden from their children; 80% never had to hide side effects of therapies. All healthy parents and 87.5% of sick ones found that communicating with their children was a correct strategy, and that this intervention by hematologist and psychologist was useful. According to 88% of them, such a difficult task is responsibility of parents and of a specific professional figure, the hematologist. The use of simple images and metaphors helped 85.7% of healthy parents and 62.5% of ill ones to understand the illness better. According to 75% of parents, the intervention also played a key role in improving their relationship with doctors. The T-Lab analysis of recurring words is presented in Tab 2. Conclusions Data indicate that for parent it is important to be supported by their hematologist in the difficult task of explaining their illness to their children. The Emanuela Project allows parents to retain a parental role despite their illness; communication contributes also to increase trust in the medical staff and compliance to physically and emotionally demanding treatments. These data will be compared to those obtained in nearby hospitals who do not offer such a service. Disclosures Gambacorti-Passerini: BMS: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document