scholarly journals KONSTRUKSI REALITAS KONFLIK INDUSTRI PENERBANGAN Framing Pemberitaan Konflik Traveloka Vs AirAsia di Detik.com

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-63
Author(s):  
Euis Komalawati
Keyword(s):  
Distribution Channel ◽  
Treatment Recommendation ◽  
Aviation Industry ◽  
Online Media ◽  
Framing Analysis ◽  
Public Attention ◽  
Transportation Services ◽  
The Public ◽  
Online Travel ◽  
Business To Business

Entering into 2019, the public users of air transportation services were shocked by various reports on issues related to the aviation industry, from rising avtur prices, high domestic flight tickets, the elimination of free baggage services to competition and penetration of foreign airlines. One of the news in online media that attracted public attention was the conflict between AirAsia and Traveloka as an online travel agent (OTA). For this reason, this study was carried out to analyze the conflict reporting framing of Traveloka vs AirAsia in Detik.com online media. This study used a qualitative method with Robert N. Entman's framing analysis approach. The unit of analysis in this study was 5 news texts about the conflict of Traveloka vs AirAsia on Detik.com media. The results of the study refer to the four elements of framing Entman. The first, defining the problem that the loss of AirAsia ticket distribution at Traveloka is due to problems with business to business and the alleged pressure of national airlines. The second, source of problems (Diagnose Causes) is Traveloka due to the pressure of the national airline. The third, the moral decision (Make Moral Judgment) of this problem cannot be allowed to drag on because it is a form of discrimination. The fourth, emphasizing the settlement (Treatment Recommendation), namely the need for dialogue between the two parties mediated by the Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU). The framing highlighted by Detik.com in the Traveloka vs AirAsia Conflict report was a bbusiness-to-business problem, even though there was an allegation that there had been an indication of an AirAsia ticket distribution channel due to the pressure of the national airlanes

scholarly journals Polemik Majelis Ulama Indonesia tentang Konsep Islam Nusantara: Sebuah Analisis Framing Media Online

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-36
Author(s):  
Zanniro Sururi Hsb
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Methods ◽  
Moral Judgment ◽  
Media Framing ◽  
Treatment Recommendations ◽  
Moral Judgement ◽  
Treatment Recommendation ◽  
Online Media ◽  
Framing Analysis ◽  
The Public ◽  
News Reports

This study explores the Indonesian Ulema Council’s polemic coverage about the concept of Islam Nusantara through online media framing analysis. To look at online media framing, I use qualitative methods with Robert N. Etnman’s framing study that examines two things: selecting issues and the emphasis or promotion of certain aspects. The analysis contained four concepts: defining problems, diagnosing causes, making a moral judgment, and treatment recommendations. The results showed that three online media gave rise to a variety of news reports. Detiknews.com brings up news about scholars’ polemic in the Indonesian Ulema Council area behind Islam Nusantara’s concept eight times, CNNIndonesia.com five times, and Kompas.com three times. Interpretations of the three online media have different attitudes. Detiknews.com in framing can not be said to be neutral, but there has been a bit of a splash of neutrality by displaying statements as a bit of a counterparty, although dominated by pre-party views. CNNIndonesia.com is more impressed to provoke the public to respond to the construction of reality in framing because many use the election diction provocative title. Kompas.com is more neutral compared to Detiknews.com and CNNIndonesia.com. Kompas media tends to use the principle of cover both sides, and the news is more in the form of articles or public opinion.Studi ini mencoba untuk mengeksplorasi pemberitaan polemik Majelis Ulama Indonesia tentang konsep Islam Nusantara melalui analisis framing media online. Untuk melihat framing media online, penulis menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan analisis framing Robert N. Etnman yang mengkaji dua hal, yaitu seleksi isu dan penekanan atau penonjolan aspek-aspek tertentu. Analisis tersebut terdapat empat konsep, yaitu define problems (pendefenisian masalah), diagnose causes (memperkirakan penyebab masalah), make moral judgement (membuat pilihan moral), dan treatment recommendation (menekankan penyelesaian). Hasil studi menunjukkan bahwa tiga media online memunculkan vitur berita yang beragam. Detiknews.com memunculkan berita tentang polemik ulama di kawasan MUI dibalik konsep “Islam Nusantara sebanyak 8 kali”, CNNIndonesia.com sebanyak 5 kali, dan Kompas.com sebanyak 3 kali. Interpretasi dari ketiga media online tersebut memiliki sikap berbeda-beda. Detiknews.com dalam melakukan framing belum bisa dikatakan netral, akan tetapi sudah ada sedikit percikan kenetralan dengan menampilkan pernyataan sekelumit pihak kontra walaupun didominasi pernyataan pihak yang pro. CNNIndonesia.com lebih terkesan memprovokasi masyarakat untuk menanggapi konstruksi realitas yang di framing karena banyak menggunakan pemilihan diksi judul yang provokatif. Kompas.com lebih netral dibandingkan dengan Detiknews.com dan CNNIndonesia.com. Media Kompas cenderung menggunakan prinsip cover both side dan pemberitaannya lebih banyak berbentuk artikel ataupun opini masyarakat.

scholarly journals PRESS DISPUTE RESOLUTION: METODOLOGI RESOLUSI KONFLIK BERBASIS MEDIA

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-90
Author(s):  
Kurnia Sari Wiwaha ◽  
Ustadi Hamsah
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Online News ◽  
Moral Judgement ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Treatment Recommendation ◽  
Online Media ◽  
Framing Analysis ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
The Media

Islam has been known as a religion of Rahmatn lil’alamiin which guarantees inclusion and maintains a treatise on all humanity. However, the interpretation of universality of Islam does not meet a common understanding even though within Muslim community itself. Those diverse interpretations have resulted in how the universality of Islam has been expressed. One of those quarrels toward interpretation is the discussion of Islam Nusantara. West Sumatera is one of the regions in Indonesia which implements Islamic law as its customary law in which rejection against Islam Nusantara has been echoed across the borders. The rejection caused reactions from various parties since West Sumatera strongly stated the rejection as a way for preserving it. Those dispute has been sharpened by the online news in several Indonesian media that began to raise the phenomenon up. This research aim to find out how those medias frame the news and whether online media contribute on minimizing public tensions. This research used descriptive method with qualitative approach. The source of the data focused on Indonesian online media news on 2018 and was analyzed with framing analysis from Robert N. Entman and also using the concept of treatment recommendation as an analyzes of dispute resolution. The results discovered that media with its framing analysis technique has their own moral judgement and treatment recommendation as a form of dispute resolution towards discourses in the media. This moral judgment can show the tendency and alignment of a media regarding an issue. In addition, the media also has an important role in developing the audience’s mindset in the midst of dispute it can be analyzed from the treatment recommendation that can be used as a media based dispute resolution.   Islam merupakan agama rahmatan lil ‘alamiin dan bersifat universal serta hadir sebagai sebuah risalah seluruh umat manusia. Akan tetapi, pemaknaan terhadap universalitas Islam tidak seragam terlebih pemaknaannya bagi kalangan umat Islam itu sendiri. Hal ini menimbulkan banyak interpetasi yang bermacam-macam untuk mengekspresikan universalitas Islam ini. Salah satu bentuk interpretasi ini adalah munculnya istilah Islam Nusantara yang kembali menuai perdebatan. Sumatera Barat merupakan salah satu wilayah di Indonesia dengan hukum Islam dan adatnya yang sangat kuat menolak pengistilahan ini. Penolakan ini menimbulkan banyak reaksi dari beberbagai pihak. Hal ini dikarenakan, Sumatera Barat yang sangat menjaga kelestarian budayanya menolak wacana ini yang memiliki visi samaseperti yang dimiliki Sumatera Barat. Arena pertarungan ini diperluas oleh adanya pemberitaan di media-media online Indonesia yang mulai mengangkat fenomena ini. Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk menemukan bagaimana media membingkai pemberitaan dan apakah media juga memiliki peran untuk meminimalisasi ketegangan yang terjadi antara pihak yang bertikai. Metode yang digunakan adalah metode deskriptif dengan pendekatan kualitatif. Sumber data yang diperoleh mengacu pada pemberitaan media online mainstream Indonesia pada tahun 2018 dan dianalisis dengan menggunakan teknik analisis framing media model Robert N. Entman dan treatment recommendation sebagai bentuk dispute resolution wacana di media. Hasil dari penelitan ini mengungkapkan bahwa dalam pembingkaian sebuah berita, media memiliki moral judgement-nya masing-masing. Moral Judgement ini yang dapat memperlihatkan arah atau keberpihakan suatu media terhadap suatu isu. Selain itu, media juga memiliki peranan penting dalam mendewasakan khalayak di tengah konflik. Hal ini terlihat dari adanya treatment recommendation yang dapat digunakan sebagai dispute resolution berbasis media.

scholarly journals Framing Berita Media Online terhadap Efektivitas Kinerja Pemerintah dalam Menanggulangi Tingginya Kasus PHK di Masa Pandemi COVID–19

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 62-72
Author(s):  
Tasya Fasa Anjani ◽  
Ika Novita ◽  
Shavira Amellia Damayanti ◽  
Saifuddin Zuhri
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Online Media ◽  
Government Performance ◽  
Analysis Method ◽  
Framing Analysis ◽  
News Framing ◽  
The Public ◽  
Negative Side ◽  
The Many

Abstrak. Terjadinya pandemi covid-19 telah banyak membawa perubahan secara global, kerugian dari berbagai sektor ikut dirasakan oleh masyarakat Indonesia khususnya dalam bidang tenaga kerja yang saat ini mengalami penurunan omset pada setiap perusahaan. Portal berita media online menjadi alat masyarakat untuk mengetahui informasi mengenai penyebaran wabah covid-19 terutama terkait dengan kinerja pemerintah dalam menangani lonjakan pengangguran yang saat ini sedang terjadi akibat banyaknya tindakan berupa pemutusan hubungan kerja (PHK). Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mendeksripsikan framing berita media online terkait dengan efektivitas kinerja pemerintah dalam menanggulangi tingginya kasus PHK di Indonesia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan yaitu metode analisis framing Robert M. Entman, dengan objek penelitian dari dua portal berita yang membahas kinerja pemerintah dalam menghadapi lonjakan pemutusan hubungan kerja (PHK) pada Tirto.id dan CNN Indonesia. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa baik Tirto.id maupun CNN Indonesia memperlihatkan sisi positif dan negatif dari masalah tersebut, namun yang cukup terlihat yaitu sisi negatif dari pernyataan dan juga kritik yang dimasukkan dalam isi beritanya sedangkan CNN Indonesia dalam mengemas berita mengenai masalah tersebut dari sisi pro dan kontra. Namun yang lebih terlihat yaitu sisi pro.Kata Kunci : Analisis Framing, Berita, Covid-19, Media online, PHK. ABSTRACT. The occurrence of the Covid-19 pandemic has brought many changes globally, losses from various sectors are also felt by the Indonesian people, especially in the field of labor, which is currently experiencing a decline in turnover at each company. Online media news portals are a tool for the public to find out information about the spread of the Covid-19 outbreak, especially related to the government's performance in dealing with the spike in unemployment that is currently happening due to the many actions in the form of layoffs (layoffs). The purpose of this study was to describe the online media news framing related to the effectiveness of government performance in overcoming the high number of layoffs in Indonesia. The research method used is the Robert M. Entman framing analysis method, with the object of research from two news portals that discuss the government's performance in dealing with a spike in layoffs (PHK) at Tirto.id and CNN Indonesia. The results show that both Tirto.id and CNN Indonesia show the positive and negative sides of the problem, but what is quite visible is the negative side of the statement and also the criticism that is included in the content of the news, while CNN Indonesia in packaging news about the problem from the pro and counter. But what is more visible is the pro side.Keywords: Framing Analysis, News, Covid-19, Online media, layoffs.

ANALISIS FRAMING PEMBERITAAN POLITIK DINASTI JOKOWI PADA PEMILIHAN KEPALA DAERAH SERENTAK TAHUN 2020 DI MEDIA ONLINE

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 131
Author(s):  
Abdul Aziz ◽  
Umaimah Wahid
Keyword(s):  
Problem Definition ◽  
Online Media ◽  
Analysis Model ◽  
Framing Analysis ◽  
Moral Decision Making ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Public Attention ◽  
The Family ◽  
Dynastic Politics ◽  
Data Collection Technique

Dynastic politics has always been an issue that has attracted public attention to be discussed during the Regional Head Election (Pilkada) process. This is because in reality there is a tendency in many regional heads to try to build dynastic politics. The simultaneous Regional Head Election (Pilkada) in 2020 is quite interesting with several candidates emerging from the family of President Jokowi. This study aims to determine how online media of kompas.com and okezone.com in framing news about dynastic politics in the 2020 Pilkada. To achieve this goal, this study uses a qualitative research method, where the author uses the framing analysis model of Robert N. Entmant. The object of this research is news regarding the politics of President Jokowi's dynasty, in online media kompas.com and okezone.com. The data collection technique used literature study. The results of the analysis of this study present news about dynastic politics in the 2020 Pilkada. In the results of the news framing analysis using the Robert N. Entman model, there are several stages such as problem definition, problem estimation from problem sources, moral decision making, and problem solving. The news on kompas.com clearly highlighted news that was contra or disagreeable with the existence of dynastic politics in Indonesia, especially in the 2020 Pilkada, while the news on okezone.com clearly did not question the existence of dynastic politics in the 2020 Pilkada. The victory of the two PDI-Perjuangan candidates is part of the General Chair's commitment to ensure that his party leads to produce quality young leadership. Of course, the imbalance in the selection of sources in the news is very important so that people who see it can provide a more objective opinion of the news.

scholarly journals Media and environment: how indonesia online news portal frames biodegradable issue?

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 167
Author(s):  
Monika Sri Yuliarti ◽  
Wikan Jatimurti
Keyword(s):  
Media Coverage ◽  
Environmental Issues ◽  
Online News ◽  
Treatment Recommendation ◽  
Online Media ◽  
Environmental Damage ◽  
Biodegradable Material ◽  
Analysis Model ◽  
Framing Analysis ◽  
Online News Sites

Environmental problems are still an important issue and cannot be resolved completely until now, even after the 1970s the United Nations established a world environmental day. Plastic waste is considered the most responsible for the problems of environmental damage today. Therefore, an innovation that comes from biodegradable material, with its biodegradable product is considered to be the answer to this environmental problem. This study examines how reporting on the environment is framed in online mass media, especially in relation to biodegradable material and biodegradable products. This is qualitative research, with the object of two Indonesian online news sites, namely www.detik.com and www.okezone.com. Data collection techniques used is document studies and data analysis techniques employed is Robert N. Entman's Framing analysis model which involves four elements, namely: define problems, diagnose causes, make moral judgment, and treatment recommendation. The findings of this study are that environmental issues have not dominated online media coverage, and the biodegradable issue has not been framed thoroughly by online media.

scholarly journals Komparasi Bingkai Peristiwa Bencana di Media Online Indonesia

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-78
Author(s):  
Zamhari Zamhari
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Treatment Recommendation ◽  
Online Media ◽  
Framing Analysis ◽  
Moral Statement

This paper examines the differences between Tirto.id and Republika.co.id in framing reporting on the causes of the crash of the Lion Air JT-610 plane on October 29, 2018. This research is a qualitative study using Robert M. Entman's four-stage framing analysis, namely define problems, define causes, make moral statement, and treatment recommendation. The results of this study indicate that there are differences in framing between the three online media in reporting a disaster. Tirto.id focuses more on the professionalism of Lion Air's management, while Republika.co.id focuses more on the news about the cause of the crash of the Lion Air JT-610 plane because the Lion Air JT-610 aircraft is the latest release. This proves that every newsroom has a certain standard in applying the principles of disaster journalism. Tulisan ini mengulas perbedaan Tirto.id dan Republika.co.id dalam membingkai pemberitaan penyebab jatuhnya pesawat Lion Air JT-610 pada tanggal 29 Oktober 2018. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kualitatif dengan menggunakan analisis framing empat tahap Robert M. Entman, yaitu define problems, define causes, make moral statement, dan treatment recommendation. Hasil penelitian ini menyatakan bahwa terdapat perbedaan framing di antara ketiga media online tersebut dalam memberitakan sebuah bencana. Tirto.id lebih menyoroti profesionalisme manajemen Lion Air, sedangkan Republika.co.id lebih mem-framing pemberitaan penyebab jatuhnya pesawat Lion Air JT-610 lantaran jenis pesawat Lion Air JT-610 merupakan keluaran terbaru. Hal ini membuktikan bahwa setiap newsroom memiliki standar tertentu dalam menerapkan prinsip jurnalisme bencana.

scholarly journals Polemik “Buta” dan “Budek” dalam Pidato K.H. Ma’ruf Amin: Analisis Framing Robert N. Enmant pada Media Online

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 111-124
Author(s):  
Sutan Kumala Pontas Nasution
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
People With Disabilities ◽  
Vice President ◽  
Moral Judgement ◽  
Treatment Recommendation ◽  
Online Media ◽  
Framing Analysis ◽  
The Republic

The background of the problem in this research is how three online media, CNNIndonesia.com, Republika.co.id, and Tempo.co, framed speeches containing the words “blind” and “deaf” delivered by the candidates for Vice President of the Republic of Indonesia. K.H. Ma’ruf Amin on Saturday, November 10 2018 in the presence of Barisan Nusantara (BarNus) volunteers. The three media were chosen based on the argumentation about the diversity of ideologies they held. This research method uses framing analysis proposed by Robert N. Entman. The data obtained were analyzed in four stages, that is define problems, diagnose causes, make moral judgement, and treatment recommendation. The results show that CNNIndonesia.com focuses more on the responses that arise from the community, especially people with disabilities; while Republika.co.id stated that the meaning of Ma’ruf Amin’s words did not refer to people with disabilities; and Tempo.co tended to be impartial by presenting neutral news.Latar belakang masalah pada penelitian ini adalah bagaimana tiga media online, CNNIndonesia.com, Republika.co.id, dan Tempo.co, membingkai pidato yang berisi kata-kata “buta” dan “budek” yang disampaikan oleh calon Wakil Presiden Republik Indonesia, K.H. Ma’ruf Amin pada hari Sabtu 10 November 2018 di hadapan relawan Barisan Nusantara (BarNus). Ketiga media tersebut dipilih dengan argumentasi keragaman ideologi yang dianut pemiliknya. Metode penelitian ini menggunakan analisis framing yang dikemukakan oleh Robert N. Entman. Data yang diperoleh dianalisis ke dalam empat tahap, yakni pendefinisian masalah, memperkirakan sumber masalah, membuat keputusan moral, dan menekankan penyelesaian. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa CNNIndonesia.com lebih menyoroti respon yang timbul dari masyarakat khususnya kaum disabilitas; sedangkan Republika.co.id menyebut bahwa maksud dari perkataan Ma’ruf Amin tidak menjurus kepada kaum disabilitas; dan adapun Tempo.co cenderung tidak berpihak dengan menyajikan berita yang netral.

scholarly journals Bingkai “Tampang Boyolali “ dalam Pidato Prabowo Subianto di Media Daring

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-92
Author(s):  
Mike Meiranti
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Research ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Media Framing ◽  
Moral Judgement ◽  
Treatment Recommendation ◽  
Online Media ◽  
Framing Analysis ◽  
Government Officials ◽  
Qualitative Research Method ◽  
The People

This article aims to explain and describe "tampang Boyolali" in Prabowo's speech which was explored using online media framing analysis. To see the framing of media online the authorused qualitative research method with framing analysis Robert N Entman who examined the analysis into four concepts namely: define problems, diagnose causes, make moral judgement, and treatment recommendation. The results of the study using three online media gave rise to fitur diverse news. The diction "Tampang Boyolali" in Prabowo Subianto's speech invited controversy in the community and media. Government officials also contributed to the diction of his speech. The diction "Tampang Boyolali" seemed to demean the people of Boyolali, and immediately invited an angry reaction from the people of Boyolali. Researchers collected data in the form of images and text through 3 media, namely CNNIndonesia.com, Sindonews.com, and Kompas.Com. The three media are actively preaching "Tampang Boyolali" with different framing. In this case the author tried to analyze the news with Robert N. Entmen's analysis which resulted in the fact that CNNIndonesia.com did not respond well and discredited Prabowo's apology. Meanwhile Sindonew.com appreciated Prabowo's  gentleman attitude that dared to make an apology. As Kompas.com tend to be neutral, do not appreciate and do not discredit the figures reported.Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan dan mendeskripsikan “tampang Boyolali” dalam pidato Prabowo yang dieksplorasi menggunakan analisis framing media online. Untuk melihat framing media online penulis menggunakan metode penelitian kualitatif dengan analisis framing Robert N Entman yang mengkaji analisis menjadi empat konsep yaitu: define problems (pendefenisian masalah), diagnose causes (memperkirakan penyebab masalah), make moral judgement (membuat pilihan moral), dan treatment recommendation (menekankan penyelesaian). Hasil studi menggunakan tiga media online memunculkan fitur berita yang beragam. Diksi “Tampang Boyolali" dalam pidato Prabowo Subianto mengundang kontroversi di masyarakat dan media. Para petinggi pemerintahan pun turut andil mengomentari diksi pidatonya tersebut. Diksi “Tampang Boyolali" seakan merendahkan warga Boyolali, dan seketika mengundang reaksi marah warga Boyolali. Peneliti mengumpulkan data berupa gambar dan teks melalui 3 media, yaitu CNNIndonesia.com, Sindonews.com, dan Kompas.Com. Ketiga media tersebut aktif memberitakan “Tampang Boyolali” dengan framing yang berbeda-beda. Dalam hal ini penulis mencoba menganalisis berita dengan analisis Robert N. Entmen yang menghasilkan fakta bahwa CNNIndonesia.com tidak merespon baik dan mendiskreditkan permohonan maaf Prabowo. Sedangkan Sindonew.com sangat mengapresiasi sikap gentleman Prabowo yang berani menghaturkan permohonan maaf. Adapun Kompas.com cenderung netral, tidak mengapresiasi dan tidak mendiskreditkan tokoh yang diberitakan.

scholarly journals Pemberitaan Isu Terorisme Pada Media di Indonesia: Media Kompas.com dan Voa-Islam.com dalam Peristiwa Serangan Paris November 2015

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 49
Author(s):  
Renita Novitasari Putri ◽  
Zarmansyah Zarmansyah
Keyword(s):  
Public Perception ◽  
Online Media ◽  
Framing Analysis ◽  
The Public ◽  
Long Time ◽  
Technological Developments ◽  
The Media ◽  
Setting Theory ◽  
Foreign Media ◽  
Selection Of

Terrorism is an issue that has grown for a long time and is now a concern to the world community. This comes after what is being reported by the media can form a public perception or opinion. The amount of media influence on the public is supported also by technological developments in the media that currently raise the speed of delivery and its actuality through online media. Online media in Indonesia itself has many kinds, such as Kompas.com and VOA-islam.com which have two different backgrounds. Using the qualitative method of interviewing, framing analysis in agenda setting theory and public opinion as supporting theory, this research shows that both media were covering the Paris attacks in November with different methods and points of view. This research has proof that every media will cover an event according to the ideology and characteristic (mission and vision) respectively depending on the editor of the media, including in the selection of referrals and foreign media as a comparison.

scholarly journals KONTROVERSI JFC (JEMBER FASHION CARNAVAL) KE-18 DALAM DISKURSUS MEDIA DAN PEMIKIRAN TOKOH AGAMA DI JEMBER

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 70-92
Author(s):  
Bunga Surawijaya Ningsih
Keyword(s):  
Mass Media ◽  
Religious Values ◽  
Online Media ◽  
Religious Leaders ◽  
Analysis Method ◽  
Framing Analysis ◽  
Symbolic Form ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Media ◽  
The Mass Media

The 18th JFC (Jember Fashion Carnaval) in 2019 chose Cinta Laura Kiehl as its grand ambassador. The event, which is held in every year never escapes from the media spotlight. One of them happened in 2019. this event made by Dynand Fariz which is caused controversy among public and the mass media. This event invited polemics to the response of MUI Jember,the management of Muhammadiyah Jember, and the chief of FPI East Java since the clothes that is worn by cinta laura. this phenomenon, such as in media Bangsaonline.com and Potrerjember.com which are East Java media and online media that contain the most news about the 18th JFC controversy in 2019. In this study, researchers used William A. Gamson's framing analysis method and Andre Modiglani, which emphasized to the symbolic form through figurative and rhetoric which indirectly directs the news which forms an image from certain aspects in the public. In addition, it also contains of the views of religious leaders in Jember. The result was that Bangsaonline.com andotretjember.com looked shy when it reportes the controversy news. However, in the packaging of the news, words, terms, phrases, sentences, facts, paragraphs, and images used by online media tend to highlight images that indulge in genitals and violate religious values.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document