Current state of activity of public governance bodies in the field of waste management

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Svitlychnyy Oleksandr ◽  
◽  
Gavrylyuk Oleksandr ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Public Administration ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Public Governance ◽  
Public Authorities ◽  
Administrative Functions ◽  
Current State ◽  
The Status ◽  
Management Functions ◽  
Waste Handling

The article is devoted to the study of the activities of public administration authorities in the field of legal waste handling. Normative legal acts are analyzed, scientific opinions on the important role of administrative authorities are presented, the role of administrative law in the researched sphere is emphasized. It is proved that the regulation of relations in the field of waste handling is impossible without a system of public administration entities, which in accordance with laws and other regulations, within their competence are designed to solve the tasks of the state. It is identified that in addition to the executive authorities, other subjects of administrative law that do not belong to public authorities can have certain administrative functions in the field of waste handling. They can be legal entities and collective entities that have the status of a legal entity. In some cases, regulations may provide for the involvement of individuals of private law to implement management functions in the field of waste handling. Keywords: entities, public administration, waste, activity, normative legal acts

scholarly journals Legal Regulation of Public Governance in Finland – an Illusion of Predictable Public Administration?

2015 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 52-59
Author(s):  
Niina Mäntylä ◽  
Laura Perttola ◽  
Kristian Siikavirta
Keyword(s):  
Public Administration ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Soft Law ◽  
Eu Law ◽  
Public Governance ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Changing Role

Legal coherence and predictable decision-making are the cornerstones of Finnish administrative law. The aim of this research is to analyze the factors that make administrative decisions unpredictable in Finland today. Why is the challenge so significant for the authorities? The factor analysis revealed six main features affecting predictability in the legal regulation of Finnish public governance: the increasing use of soft law, the devolution of government, deregulation, the changing role of the individual, the blurring of the division between the public and the private sector and the influence of international and EU-law.

The Judicial Elaboration of Standards for Public Administrations in France

2021 ◽  
pp. 113-131
Author(s):  
Jérémy Mercier
Keyword(s):  
Public Administration ◽  
Public Services ◽  
Institutional Context ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Public Authorities ◽  
Public Power ◽  
The Public ◽  
Creative Role

This chapter underlines how administrative law has taken a much greater significance in France since the period 1890–1910. This period is not only symbolic of a full development of administrative law around the notion of public power (puissance publique) or public service (service public) but also of the ramifications given to the very notion of State and public administration. The chapter deals with different theories (Hauriou, Duguit, etc.) related to a redefinition of the State and public services. It discusses four specific aspects: the institutional context, the case law of the Conseil d’État, the innovative orientations concerning the action of the public authorities, and the creative role of this case law.

To the Question about Terminology Optimization for the Theory of Public Administration and Administrative Law in the Context of Understanding Efficient, Good, Reasonable Public Governance

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (7) ◽  
pp. 0-0
Author(s):  
Юрий Аврутин ◽  
Yuriy Avrutin
Keyword(s):  
Public Administration ◽  
Public Management ◽  
Control Function ◽  
Academic Discipline ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Public Governance ◽  
Specific Content ◽  
Control Functions ◽  
The Status ◽  
Concept Of Function

The article analyzes the approaches of the theory of public management and administrative law to such concepts as public governance, public administration and regulation, proves inexpediency of the use of the wide approach to understanding public administration; analyzes a pproaches to understanding control functions and managerial functions, suggests the author’s definition of the concept of “function” and “control function”, proves the expediency of using such concepts as functions-tasks and functions-operations. The author pays special attention to problematic issues of understanding governance as efficient, good, proper, reasonable governance, reveals general and specific content of these concepts, proves that they are conventional concepts and serve as qualitative characteristics of public governance and are of a doctrinal political-legal and axiological nature. As doctrinal concepts, they can influence modernization of the administrative law paradigm as a science, academic discipline, and a branch of legislation. The use of these concepts for instrumental purposes can help to specify criteria and indices, applied during the assessment of the status of public governance, actions and decisions of public administration agencies and functionaries, to the level of common sense, reflecting social feeling of citizens on the way to overcome estrangement between power and population, which is traditional for Russia.

scholarly journals The Principle Of Legality, Principle Of Public Law

2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 512-515
Author(s):  
Alexandru Stoian ◽  
Teodora Drăghici
Keyword(s):  
Public Administration ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Public Law ◽  
The State ◽  
Public Authorities ◽  
The Social ◽  
Social Balance ◽  
The Moment ◽  
Principle Of Legality

Abstract The principle of legality represents one of the most important principles of the state of law, which significantly contributes to defending the law order and the social balance. Established as a principle of the organization and functioning of the state public authorities at the Revolution of 1789 in France, the acknowledgement of the principle of legality in an act having a constitutional value marked the moment of foundation for the state based on law principles and represented a premise of creating a modern public administration. The principle is present at the level of each judiciary branch, which provides for its popularity due to its specificity. The paper aims at achieving a brief analysis of the role of the principle of legality in public law, presenting its importance in constitutional and administrative law.

scholarly journals ON THE QUESTION OF DEFINITION OF THE CONCEPT OF ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIVITY OF THE STATE MIGRATION SERVICE OF UKRAINE

2020 ◽  
pp. 230-236
Author(s):  
В. В. Репело
Keyword(s):  
Public Administration ◽  
Scientific Literature ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
The State ◽  
Main Attention ◽  
Public Authorities ◽  
Administrative Functions ◽  
Characteristic Features ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
The Right

The study analyzes the categorical apparatus related to the concept of administrative activity of the State Migration Service in Ukraine, namely the categories «administration», «public administration», «public administration», «administrativeactivity»andothers.Thedefinitionoftheconceptof«administration» in the encyclopedic literature, in particular in the Legal Encyclopedia, highlights the main features of the administration, public administration. The term «public administration» is analyzed, the positions on definition of this definition by researchers O. Shatylo are given), it is indicated that this term is used in two meanings (narrow and wide), the definitions of public administration of V. Averyanov, R. Kravtsova, S. Chernov are also given. A. Zelentsov’s position on the characteristic features of public administration that distinguish it from private administration is highlighted. The main attention is paid to the disclosure of the term «administrative activity», the definition is defined in the reference literature, namely in the Great Ukrainian Encyclopedia, the Encyclopedia of Modern Ukraine. It is emphasized that the administrative activities of public authorities are implemented through the powers vested in the state, and from the state they receive the right to perform administrative functions, such powers are defined exclusively in regulations of the state and its authorities. Positions on the definition of «administrative activity» by M. Ishchenko, E. Mishchuk, A. Sorochynsky, S. Petkov and L. Spytska are given. Based on the analysis of legislation, bylaws and scientific literature on administrative law, the definition of the concept of administrative activity of the State Migration Service of Ukraine is proposed.

scholarly journals IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CONCEPT OF DISTINGUISHING THE FUNCTIONS OF THE CPSU AND STATE AUTHORITIES (THE PERIOD OF GORBACHOVSKY'S REBUILDING)

2020 ◽  
pp. 239-249
Author(s):  
Є. Бородін
Keyword(s):  
Public Administration ◽  
Dominant Role ◽  
Soviet Society ◽  
Public Authorities ◽  
Party Leadership ◽  
Political Pluralism ◽  
The Status ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
June July

The article covers the process of introducing the concept of division of functions of party and state bodies in the USSR during the Gorbachev «perestroika» years. The monopoly ruling party, which in accordance with the Constitution of the USSR in 1978 had the status of a «leading and guiding force» of Soviet society, felt the need to define new relations with public authorities in the context of the proposed reforms of public administration. Based on the definition of the political system of Soviet society, the party leadership gradually democratized the concept of «party leadership.» Initially, at the 21st CPSU Congress (February – March 1986), a «soft concept» was introduced to prevent «the confusion of party and state functions», which relied on the abandonment of petty guardianship and the replacement of state structures by the authorities. Then, at the 19th CPSU Conference (June – July 1988), under political reform in the USSR, a «rigid concept» of «delineation of functions» was introduced, which anticipated the role of the party as a policy-maker and its members as government leaders. The introduction of the concept of «delineation of functions» in no way called into question the monopoly position of the CPSU in the system of public administration, the dominance of the so-called «Marxist-Leninist ideology». Under the changes that put on the agenda the emergence of such mandatory attributes of democratic transformations as political pluralism, free elections, multiparty system, the CPSU ideologists sought the basis for their own theories in the decisions of the VIII Congress of the RCP (b) (1919) and in V. I. Lenin’s works at the time of the elimination of the multiparty system in the USSR. In the process of finding a solution to prevent the replacement of state structures by party bodies, the dominant role of the CPSU in the system of public administration of the USSR was actually recognized, and the preconditions for further radical changes in Soviet society were created.

scholarly journals Administrative Functions of Implementation, Control of Administrative Decisions, and Protection of Rights

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-25
Author(s):  
Ricardo Perlingeiro
Keyword(s):  
Latin American ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Administrative Functions ◽  
The One ◽  
Right To Good Administration ◽  
Regulatory Powers ◽  
Administrative Adjudication ◽  
Administrative Justice

Abstract This essay includes a comparative analysis of the traditions of administrative law in Latin American and their impact on the contemporary scene and trends in the general orientations of its administrative justice systems. This analysis is limited to Latin American countries of Iberian origin under the jurisdiction of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (“I/A Court H.R”). The method followed by the author is to point out the roles attributable to the administrative authorities and to attempt to identify a distinction in Latin America between the “administrative function of implementation”, “control of the legality of administrative decisions” (unrelated to any adjudicative function) and the “protection of rights” (by means of an adjudicative function) while examining their historical genesis and possible future trends. From that perspective, the text discusses certain administrative powers, such as disciplinary or other regulatory powers, and their forms of concrete application; the prerogatives and instruments of the authorities and of their decision-making employees in the exercise of the functions of implementation; the control of administrative decisions by those authorities themselves and by external bodies; and judicial and extrajudicial protection of rights against administrative decisions. The author concludes that Latin American administrative law, despite the fact that its civil-law substantive roots have always coexisted with judicial review typical of common law, is currently tending, on the one hand, to approximate the U.S. model of administrative adjudication and, on the other, to adapt to I/A Court H.R case law with respect to the administrative function of implementation in harmony with the fundamental right to good administration which, combined with a critical re-examination of diffuse control of the legality of administrative rules in court, would safeguard the true role of adjudicating bodies (administrative authorities or courts) in their function of protecting individual rights for the sake of more fair and equitable administrative justice.

scholarly journals Implementation of the Function of Maximizing the Security Level in the Administration of Justice in the Digital Economy

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (Especial II) ◽  
pp. 216-225
Author(s):  
Damir Khamitovich Valeev ◽  
Anas Gaptraufovich Nuriev
Keyword(s):  
Public Administration ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
Digital Economy ◽  
Positive Development ◽  
Security Level ◽  
The Public ◽  
Administration Of Justice ◽  
The Status ◽  
Dialectical Analysis

The research analyses the implementation of the role of maximizing the level of security in the administration of justice in the context of the digital economy. Methodologically, the documentary observation research technique and, to process sources, sociological-dialectical analysis were used. Digitization as a transformational factor of many branches of social relations implies dependence on the implementation of a series of interdependent legal facts with digital technologies so that the action has a legal and concrete result. The digital level as a new platform for the implementation of a number of public functions posing new challenges for the public administration system and also determines the status of new functions that can provide a "digital future" with a positive development dynamic. Conclusion mode everything indicates that, these new functions can be austable in order to maximize security in the implementation of public functions in response to new threats. Particularly sensitive is the area of justice administration, which is also actively introducing many digital tools into the case-resolution process.

scholarly journals Legal Regulation of the Status of Subjects of Special Competence in Relation to Public Administration in the Sphere of Intellectual Property in Ukraine

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 221-236
Author(s):  
Yevhen Leheza ◽  
Yuriy Deliya ◽  
Eduard Ryzhkov ◽  
Serhii Albul ◽  
Oleksandr Shamara
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Public Administration ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Documentary Sources ◽  
Domestic Legislation ◽  
The Status ◽  
Special Competence

Relevant issues of the administrative and legal status of subjects of special competence in relation to public administration in the field of intellectual property are considered. Main  content. A circle of specified subjects in the system of subjects of public administration is determined. The role of subjects of special competence in the fulfilment of tasks of public administration in the sphere of intellectual property is identified. Classification of subjects of special competence regarding public administration in this field is presented. Features of the administrative or legal status of each group of subjects of special competence in relation to public administration in the field of intellectual property are analyzed. Specifics of the influence of these subjects on legal relations arising in the sphere of intellectual property are characterized. Materials and methods research based on the analysis of documentary sources. the  basis  is  the  dialectical  method  of  cognition  of  the  facts  of  social  reality,  on  which  the  formal legal and comparative legal approaches are largely based. Conclusions are drawn about the place of subjects of special competence in relation to public administration in the field of intellectual property among other subjects. Proposals on the necessity to improve current domestic legislation in the sphere of intellectual property are formulated.Keywords: Public administration; Intellectual property; Legal regulation; Relation; Sphere; Subjects of special competence Peraturan hukum status subjek kompetensi khusus dalam kaitannya dengan administrasi publik di bidang kekayaan intelektual di Ukraina  Abstrak.Masalah yang relevan dari status administrasi dan hukum mata pelajaran kompetensi khusus dalam kaitannya dengan administrasi publik di bidang kekayaan intelektual dipertimbangkan. Isi utama. Lingkaran mata pelajaran tertentu dalam sistem mata pelajaran administrasi publik ditentukan. Peran mata pelajaran kompetensi khusus dalam pemenuhan tugas administrasi publik di bidang kekayaan intelektual diidentifikasi. Klasifikasi mata pelajaran kompetensi khusus tentang administrasi publik di bidang ini disajikan. Fitur status administrasi atau hukum dari setiap kelompok mata pelajaran kompetensi khusus dalam kaitannya dengan administrasi publik di bidang kekayaan intelektual dianalisis. Spesifik pengaruh subjek ini pada hubungan hukum yang timbul di bidang kekayaan intelektual dicirikan. Bahan dan metode penelitian berdasarkan analisis sumber dokumenter. Basisnya adalah metode kognisi dialektis atas fakta-fakta realitas sosial, yang menjadi dasar sebagian besar pendekatan hukum formal dan hukum komparatif. Kesimpulan diambil tentang tempat mata pelajaran kompetensi khusus dalam kaitannya dengan administrasi publik di bidang kekayaan intelektual antara mata pelajaran lainnya. Proposal tentang perlunya meningkatkan undang-undang domestik saat ini di bidang kekayaan intelektual dirumuskan.Kata kunci: Administrasi publik, Kekayaan intelektual, Regulasi hukum, Hubungan, Lingkungan, Mata pelajaran kompetensi khusus Правовое регулирование статуса субъектов особой компетенции в отношении государственного управления в сфере интеллектуальной собственности в УкраинеАннотация Рассмотрены актуальные вопросы административно-правового статуса субъектов особой компетенции применительно к государственному управлению в сфере интеллектуальной собственности. Основное содержание. Определен круг указанных субъектов в системе субъектов государственного управления. Выявлена роль субъектов специальной компетенции в выполнении задач государственного управления в сфере интеллектуальной собственности. Представлена классификация предметов особой компетенции государственного управления в этой области. Анализируются особенности административно-правового статуса каждой группы субъектов особой компетенции применительно к государственному управлению в сфере интеллектуальной собственности. Охарактеризована специфика влияния этих субъектов на правоотношения, возникающие в сфере интеллектуальной собственности. Материалы и методы исследования на основе анализа документальных источников. в основе лежит диалектический метод познания фактов социальной действительности, на котором в значительной степени базируются формально-правовой и сравнительно-правовой подходы. Сделаны выводы о месте субъектов особой компетенции по отношению к государственному управлению в сфере интеллектуальной собственности среди других субъектов. Сформулированы предложения о необходимости совершенствования действующего украинского законодательства в области интеллектуальной собственности.Ключевые слова: Государственное управление, Интеллектуальная собственность, Правовое регулирование, Отношения, Сфера, Субъекты особой компетенции.

scholarly journals SUBJECTS OF ADMINISTRATIVE AND LEGAL SUPPORT IDENTIFICATION OF CHILDREN SEPARATED WITH FAMILY IN UKRAINE

2020 ◽  
pp. 205-210
Author(s):  
А. М. Мамульчик
Keyword(s):  
Parental Care ◽  
Public Administration ◽  
Local Governments ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Refugee Status ◽  
Public Authorities ◽  
Her Family ◽  
The Family ◽  
Additional Protection ◽  
The Status

The relevance of the article is that the granting of special status «child divorced from the family» in the Ukrainian legislation includes three aspects: 1) identification of a person who is a child separated from the family; 2) granting the status of «child deprived of parental care»; 3) it is possible to grant the status of “refugee” or “person in need of additional protection”, as any person recognized as a child divorced from a family is recognized as a child deprived of parental care and can apply for asylum in Ukraine (and receive refugee status or a person in need of additional protection). Each of the identified aspects of the above status is the responsibility of certain public authorities, ie public administration entities, which are endowed with the appropriate powers. The purpose of the article is to identify the subjects of administrative and legal support for the identification of children separated from their families, ie the subjects of public administration, which are empowered to identify such children in Ukraine. It was found that in fact, the identification of a child separated from the family at the present stage in Ukraine does not belong to the responsibilities of public administration, but is the responsibility of the child who was forced to leave the country of origin or residence and arrived in the territory of Ukraine unaccompanied by a family member or persons determined by law/custom who are responsible for such a person, or who were left unaccompanied after arriving on the territory of Ukraine, or its legal representatives. In our opinion, the absence in the legal acts that determine the legal status of public administration entities, whose activities include the identification of children separated from their families, their obligation to identify such children is a shortcoming of administrative and legal support for child status. , separated from her family, in Ukraine. It is determined that the subjects of public administration, which have the authority to identify children separated from their families, include the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine, executive authorities, local governments, the National Police of Ukraine, the Prosecutor’s Office of Ukraine.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document