scholarly journals URGENSI PENDAFTARAN PADA TANAH YANG BELUM BERSERTIFIKAT

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 91
Author(s):  
Ningrum Ambarsari ◽  
Noor Azizah
Keyword(s):  
Land Rights ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Proof Of Ownership ◽  
Agrarian Law ◽  
Ownership Of Land ◽  
First Time

AbstractThe urgency of land registration for the first time on land that has not been certified is intended to realize the orderly administration and legal certainty for landowners. This is because the implementation of land registration will produce a final product that is a certificate as a proof of ownership of land rights. This research aims to determine how the first land registration on land that has not been certified and how obstacles in the first Land registry. This research is expected to make a meaningful contribution. Theoretically, this research is beneficial for the development of legal sciences, especially regarding agrarian law. Keynote: Agrarian, Land Registration, Certified Land. AbstrakUrgensi Pendaftaran Tanah untuk Pertama Kali pada Tanah yang belum Bersertifikat dimaksudkan untuk mewujudkan tertib administrasi dan kepastian hukum bagi pemilik tanah. Hal ini karena penyelenggaraan pendaftaran tanah akan menghasilkan suatu produk akhir yaitu berupa sertifikat sebagai tanda bukti kepemilikan hak atas tanah. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana pendaftaran tanah yang pertama kali pada tanah yang belum bersertifikat dan bagaimana kendala – kendala dalam Pendaftaran tanah yang pertama kali. Penelitian ini diharapkan dapat memberikan kontribusi yang sangat berarti. Secara teoritis penelitian ini bermanfaat untuk kepentingan pengembangan Ilmu hukum, khususnya mengenai Hukum Agraria. Kata Kunci: Agraria, Pendaftaran Tanah, Sertifikat Tanah

scholarly journals Penyelesaian atas Sertipikat Tanah Ganda Menurut Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 Tentang Pendaftaran Tanah (Studi Putusan: Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1537 K/PDT/2018)

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 1214
Author(s):  
Vanesia Hendrika Elvina ◽  
Hasni Hasni
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
District Court ◽  
Positive System ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
High Court ◽  
Strength Of Evidence ◽  
Ownership Of Land ◽  
First Time

The purpose of implementing land registration is to provide legal certainty and legal protection. The Agrarian Law that is used in Indonesia adheres to a negative system that is tied to a positive system. The land registration activity for the first time produced proof of rights, in the form of certificates as a means of proof of land rights. Certificate as a strong proof of rights means that physical data and juridical data in a certificate have the strength of evidence and must be accepted as true information, as long as it is not proven otherwise with other evidence in the form of certificates or other certificates. In Subari’s case, there was a double land certificate in the same plot of land. Subari has the ownership of land rights that is got from his parents and from purchasing with two buffaloes. But, there are other people who dominate the land that is belong to Subari and they also have the certificate to proof their ownership of the land rights. Settlement of multiple land certificates can be done through the Court, to obtain legal certainty that the certificate of ownership of land rights which has stronger evidence is based on evidence. The district court ruled that ownership of land rights belonged to Subari, and this decision was reinforced by high court and a Supreme Court.[F1]  [F1]Paragarf single

scholarly journals First-Time Registration of Ownership of Land Obtained Through Sale and Purchase under the Hand Whose Proof of Ownership Is Lost

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 671
Author(s):  
Bintang Uswatun Hasanah ◽  
Any Suryani ◽  
Widodo Dwi Putro
Keyword(s):  
Land Rights ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Land Title ◽  
Proof Of Ownership ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government ◽  
Sociological Approaches ◽  
Ownership Of Land ◽  
Ownership Rights ◽  
First Time

In practice, people who experience loss of proof of ownership rights over land where in the land title application must provide evidence of information about the land which includes data on physical and physical data. As stipulated in Law No. 5/1960 concerning Regulation on Basic Agrarian Principles article 19 that To ensure legal certainty by the Government registration of land throughout the territory of the Republic of Indonesia according to the provisions regulated by Government Regulations, registration includes one of giving letters - proof of rights, which applies as a strong evidence tool. The problem in this study is how is the validity of buying and selling rights to land carried out under the hands? and how is the registration process the first application for ownership of land to land whose proof of ownership is lost? The purpose of this study was to determine the validity of the sale and purchase of land rights carried out under the hand, and to find out the process of registering the transfer of land rights at the Bima City Land Office whose proof of ownership was lost. This research has benefits both academically and practically. The research used in this study is Empirical Law research and the approach in this study is the Legislative, Conceptual, and Sociological approaches. The process of buying and selling land under the hands carried out before the Head of Village / Lurah and witnesses is valid because the buying and selling conditions have been fulfilled according to Law Number 5 Year 1960 concerning Agrarian Principal Regulations. The first application for land registration in Bima City whose proof of ownership is lost in practice can still be registered.

scholarly journals HUKUM MAHAR BERUPA TANAH DALAM KEBIASAAN MASYARAKAT BUGIS BONE MENURUT PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-36
Author(s):  
Hasma Mhi
Keyword(s):  
Government Regulation ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Local Order ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Basic Principles ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Legal Development ◽  
Proof Of Ownership ◽  
Ownership Of Land ◽  
The Village

AbstractGiving Mahar in the tradition of the Bugis Bone community, commonly given by husbands to wives in the form of land. Provision of Mahar in the form of land is regulated in the provisions of the marriage law, UU number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage, Juncto UUPA number 5 of 1960 concerning Basic Principles of Agrarian Law, Juncto Government Regulation (PP) number 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration and KHI.Giving Mahar in the form of land accompanied by a statement that knows and is signed by a local order, namely head of the village related to the location of the Mahar land, is an evidence that is not strong. because proof of ownership is the strongest according to civil law is proof of the authentic deed. Authentic proof of ownership of land must be registered at the Land Agency Office and the certificate of dowry land issued. To provide collateral in the form of legal certainty of dowry ownership in the form of land that should be certified on behalf of the wife.Keywords: Land Certification; Mahar; Legal Development.

scholarly journals Implementasi PTSL Sebagai Upaya Pencegahan Konflik Pertanahan Di Kecamatan Ingin Jaya Kabupaten Aceh Besar

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 217
Author(s):  
M. Syuib ◽  
Sarah Diana Aulia
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Large Area ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Land Dispute ◽  
Land Disputes ◽  
Legal Uncertainty ◽  
The Government ◽  
Ownership Of Land

In order to guarantee legal certainty for land rights holders, the Government is conducting land registration program throughout Indonesia territory. The program has put an obligation to the land rights holder to register their land. The purpose of land registration is, to provide evidence for the ownership of land. The implementation mechanism of the program in regulated in the Permen ATR/BPN Number 6 of 2018 concerning Complete Systematic Land Registration (PTSL). The presence of the Permen is, in order to prevent land disputes in the community by accelerating land registration. Sub-district of Ingin Jaya, which is located in the Aceh Besar district, is one of the areas where PTSL activities are carried out. Currently, there is a large area of land in the Aceh Besar district has not been certified yet, it may cause legal uncertainty for land owner and such condition can potentially lead to land dispute. One of the indicators to claim this, are by taking land dispute cases as put on trial in the Jantho Court which has reached 32 cases from 2014 until 2019. This study aims to find out how the implementation of PTSL and its barrier in the Sub-District of Ingin Jaya, Aceh Besar. The research method is an empirical juridical research; it works by conducting observations, interviews, and documentation. The result found that the implementation of PTSL in the Sub-District of Ingin Jaya, Aceh Besar, is in accordance with Permen ATR/BPN No. 6 of 2018. However, in the ground, it is found that there are a number of obstacles which affect the successful of the PTSL program both internally and externally. Therefore, synergy and cooperation with all parties are needed so that the PTSL program in the Sub-District of Ingin Jaya can be implemented successfully in order to provide legal certainty for land rights holders, so that the land dispute can be prevented as early as possible.

scholarly journals HUKUM MAHAR BERUPA TANAH DALAM KEBIASAAN MASYARAKAT BUGIS BONE MENURUT PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-36
Author(s):  
Hasma Mhi
Keyword(s):  
Government Regulation ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Local Order ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Basic Principles ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Legal Development ◽  
Proof Of Ownership ◽  
Ownership Of Land ◽  
The Village

AbstractGiving Mahar in the tradition of the Bugis Bone community, commonly given by husbands to wives in the form of land. Provision of Mahar in the form of land is regulated in the provisions of the marriage law, UU number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage, Juncto UUPA number 5 of 1960 concerning Basic Principles of Agrarian Law, Juncto Government Regulation (PP) number 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration and KHI.Giving Mahar in the form of land accompanied by a statement that knows and is signed by a local order, namely head of the village related to the location of the Mahar land, is an evidence that is not strong. because proof of ownership is the strongest according to civil law is proof of the authentic deed. Authentic proof of ownership of land must be registered at the Land Agency Office and the certificate of dowry land issued. To provide collateral in the form of legal certainty of dowry ownership in the form of land that should be certified on behalf of the wife.Keywords: Land Certification; Mahar; Legal Development.

scholarly journals PENYULUHAN HUKUM PENTINGNYA KEPEMILIKAN SERTIFIKAT TANAH TENTANG PENDAFTARAN TANAH DI DESA KEDUNGBOTO KEC. LIMBANGAN KAB. KENDAL

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Saiful Aziz
Keyword(s):  
Land Rights ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Power ◽  
Physical Data ◽  
Proof Of Ownership ◽  
Ownership Of Land

Abstract The certificate is a proof of rights which is valid as a proof of strong ownership of physical data and juridical data contained in the measuring certificate and land book of the relevant rights in accordance with Article 19 Paragraph (2) of the LoGA. In practice in the community it turns out that the certificate of land rights is not the only proof of ownership of land rights, but old rights such as girik and receipts are proof of ownership of land rights, which are based on Article 24 paragraph (1) PP 24 of 1997 Problems to be resolved in this study (1) how the legal power of land rights certificates (2) what efforts can be made to ensure legal certainty in the land sector. Keyword: Certificate, ownership, legal power

scholarly journals Pelaksanaan Pendaftaran Tanah Sistematis Lengkap di Desa Menanga, Kecamatan Rendang, Kabupaten Karangasem

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 651-657
Author(s):  
Nyoman Handytya Wiarsa Putra ◽  
Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi ◽  
Luh Putu Suryani
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Planning ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government ◽  
Ownership Of Land ◽  
The Village

Complete systematic land registration is a program organized by the government, specifically the "Ministry of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning or Head of the National Land Agency". with the aim of increasing the number of land registrations issuing certificates in Indonesia. This is very important, so it is hoped that the participation of the whole community in the importance of certificates and it is hoped that the National Land Agency will provide socialization about the importance of ownership of land rights. Its application is contained in the Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning or the Head of the National Land Agency of the Republic of Indonesia Number 6 of 2018 concerning Complete Systematic Land Registration. This study aimed to examine the process of implementing a complete systematic land registration and its obstacles and to examine the efforts to implement a complete systematic land registration in the village of Menanga, Rendang District, Karangasem Regency. The method used was empirical legal research. Sources of data used were primary and secondary legal data, then analyzed through interpretation and qualitative techniques. The results showed that the Implementation of Complete Systematic Land Registration in Menanga Village, Rendang District, Karangasem Regency was carried out to achieve legal certainty of land rights ownership. The implementation of this program has not been effective and has not been implemented optimally due to the low participation in the management of land certificates.

JUAL BELI TANAH YANG DILAKUKAN TANPA AKTA PPAT

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-107
Author(s):  
Cheri Bayuni Budjang
Keyword(s):  
Everyday Life ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
The Other ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
The Future ◽  
The Right ◽  
Laws And Regulations

Buying and selling is a way to transfer land rights according to the provisions in Article 37 paragraph (1) of Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration which must include the deed of the Land Deed Making Official to register the right of land rights (behind the name) to the Land Office to create legal certainty and minimize the risks that occur in the future. However, in everyday life there is still a lot of buying and selling land that is not based on the laws and regulations that apply, namely only by using receipts and trust in each other. This is certainly very detrimental to both parties in the transfer of rights (behind the name), especially if the other party is not known to exist like the Case in Decision Number 42 / Pdt.G / 2010 / PN.Mtp

Pelaksanaan Pencatatan Blokir Sertipikat Hak Atas Tanah (Studi di Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Sleman dan Bantul)

Tunas Agraria ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-135
Author(s):  
Anisa Sekarsari ◽  
Haryo Budhiawan ◽  
Akur Nurasa
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Land Dispute ◽  
Time Period ◽  
Recording Process ◽  
Potential Loss ◽  
The Government

Abstract: In order to give the assurance of legal certainty, certainty of rights and legal protection to holders and owners of land rights, the land registration shall be carried out. However, there is still a land dispute which now become a homework for The Government. This is because the certificate which should be a strong evidentiary can not guaranteed the legal certainty for the owner, so the person who right the land can blocking the certificate of land rights at Land Office. The issuance of Regulation Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial / Head of National Land Office Number 13 Year of 2017 concerning the Procedures of Block and Sita which expected to create uniformity, standardization in recording process and abolition of registration blocked, it turns out not all the rules can be implemented at The Land Office of Sleman and Bantul Regency.The result of this research shows that blocking certificate process at Sleman Land Office and Bantul Land Office have a policy that the applicant is required to pay the blocking recording fee after the blocking received. Makes a potential loss to the (PNBP) which should be owned by Land Office for faced the problem of KKPweb application which have not been able to accomodate the time period of blocking. Keywords : blocking certificate, blocking, registration blocked Intisari: Dalam rangka memberikan jaminan kepastian hukum dan kepastian hak serta perlindungan hukum kepada pemegang dan pemilik hak atas tanah, maka dilaksanakan pendaftaran tanah. Namun demikian, masih saja terjadi sengketa pertanahan yang saat ini menjadi pekerjaan rumah bagi Pemerintah. Hal ini disebabkan karena, sertipikat sebagai alat pembuktian yang kuat ternyata belum menjamin kepastian hukum pemiliknya sehingga pihak yang merasa berhak atas tanah tersebut dapat melakukan blokir sertipikat hak atas tanah di Kantor Pertanahan. Dikeluarkannya Permen ATR/Kepala Nomor 13 Tahun 2017 tentang Tata Cara Blokir dan Sita yang diharapkan bertujuan untuk mewujudkan keseragaman, standarisasi dalam pelaksanaan pencatatan dan penghapusan catatan blokir ternyata tidak semua peraturan tersebut dapat dilaksanakan di Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Sleman dan Bantul. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa pelaksanaan pencatatan blokir di kantor pertanahan Kabupaten Sleman dan Kabupaten Bantul terdapat kebijakan yaitu pemohon diwajibkan membayar biaya pencatatan blokir setelah blokirnya diterima membuat potensial loss terhadap (PNBP) yang seharusnya didapat kantor pertanahan untuk kendala yang dihadapi yaitu Aplikasi KKPweb yang belum dapat mengakomodir jangka waktu blokir. Kata Kunci: blokir sertipikat, pemblokiran, pencatatan blokir

Pengukuran Pihak Ketiga Pasca Asas Contradictoire Delimitatie di Kabupaten Sidoarjo dan Pasuruan

Tunas Agraria ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 53-75
Author(s):  
Dedy Setyo Irawan ◽  
Harvini Wulansari
Keyword(s):  
Secondary Data ◽  
Third Parties ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Problem Analysis ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Descriptive Approach ◽  
The Government ◽  
Ownership Of Land

Abstract: Complete Systematic Land Registration is a program which taken by the government in providing legal certainty in the field of land in Indonesia. PTSL activities at Sidoarjo Regency and Pasuruan Regency Land Office are carried out with third parties. Before starting the measurement, it is necessary to carry out the contradictoire delimitatie principle to ensure legal certainty of ownership of land rights. The research used a qualitative method with a descriptive approach. The data analysis carried out by compiling logically proportional statements to answer research questions. Problem analysis is carried out by making a description based on premier data and secondary data obtained through interviews and observations of implementation. The results of the research showed that the implementation of the contradictoire delimitatie principle is broadly following PP. No. 24 of 1997 and PMNA KaBPN No. 3 of 1997. The results of the study also showed that there were obstacles in the implementation of the contradictoire delimitatie principle, such as the third parties were not following technical guidelines No. 01 / JUKNIS-300/1/2018 annex 10 in the making of measurement drawings. Quality control is needed to improve the quality of work and results of third party products and minimize land problems in the future.Keywords: principle of contradictoire delimitation, third party. Intisari : Pendaftaran Tanah Sistematis Lengkap (PTSL) merupakan langkah pemerintah dalam memberikan jaminan kepastian hukum dalam bidang pertanahan di Indonesia. Kegiatan PTSL di Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Sidoarjo dan Kabupaten Pasuruan dilaksanakan bekerjasama dengan Pihak Ketiga yang sebelumnya melalui tahapan asas contradictoire delimitatie untuk menjamin kepastian hukum kepemilikan hak atas tanah. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan deskriptif. Teknik analisa yang dilakukan yaitu dengan menyusun pernyataan-pernyataan proposional secara logis untuk menjawab pertanyaan penelitian. Analisa permasalahan dilakukan dengan membuat uraian berdasarkan data premier dan data sekunder yang diperoleh melalui wawancara serta observasi langsung terhadap pelaksanaan kegiatan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pelaksanaan asas contradictoire delimitatie secara garis besar telah sesuai dengan PP. No. 24 Tahun 1997 dan PMNA KaBPN No. 3 Tahun 1997. Dalam pelaksanaanya terdapat hambatan yakni  pembuatan Gambar Ukur oleh Pihak Ketiga tidak sesuai dengan pedoman JUKNIS No. 01/JUKNIS-300/1/2018 lampiran 10. Sehingga diperlukan pengawasan kendali mutu terkait pekerjaan dan hasil produk dari Pihak Ketiga agar kedepannya hasil pekerjaan yang dihasilkan lebih baik dan tidak menjadi permasalahan pertanahan dikemudian hari.Kata Kunci : asas contradictoire delimitatie, pihak ketiga.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document