AUDIT SERVICES MARKET IN UKRAINE

Author(s):  
NAZAROVA Karina ◽  
NEHODENKO Viktoriia ◽  
MINIAILO Viktoriia

Background. Trends in the open economy, the processes of information globa­lization require the search for new effective tools of trust of the state, public oversight bodies, investors, the public and other professional and non-professional users of infor­mation to business. This tool is an independent external audit: it helps to identify defi­ciencies in the activities of the entity, to identifyways to correct them, as well as to deve­lop preventive measures to avoid them. Analysis of recent research and publications has shown that the state of audit activity in Ukraine does not fully meet today’s requirements, an important scientific and practical problem of the development of the audit services market and quality control of audit services in Ukraine remains unresolved. The aim of the article is to analyze the market of audit services in Ukraine and assess potential ways of further development of auditing. Materials and methods. The theoretical and methodological basis of the publication is a set of studies of domestic and foreign scientists. General scientific and special methods of scientific cognition are used: comparative, systematic and statistical analysis to clarify the cause-and-effect relationship and assess the market of audit services in Ukraine. Results. A study of the audit services market in Ukraine was conducted, the dyna­mics of the number of audit entities (SAА) and the dynamics of the volume of pro­vision of a number of audit services were analyzed. The information on the composition and number of audit entities is summarized, as well as the volume of provided audit services in terms of regions of Ukraine is studied. The problems of audit activity development are outlined, the main ones of which are insufficient normative provision, imperfect system of digitalization of audit procedures, etc. Conclusion. In recent years, the conditions and quality of the audit services mar­ket in Ukraine have changed radically, primarily due to the implantation of foreign expe­rience in the national audit system, expanding the possibility of diversification of profes­sional audit services, as well as the digitalization of auditing. This opens up new opportunities both for the auditors and audit firms themselves and for the customers of their services. In addition, various additional audit and related services have become widespread. To increase the competitiveness of Ukrainian audit companies it is necessary to take into account global trends, foreign experience and modern technologies of custo­mer service, which requires: improving the legal regulation of auditing in Ukraine; impro­ving the methodology and organization of audits; development of the optimal method of determining the cost of audit services.

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Stupnytska ◽  
N. Kuprina ◽  
Н. Tkachuk ◽  
Kh. Baraniuk

Auditing in Ukraine is on the path of formation and development, which necessitates the improvement and revision of regulations, which, in turn, leads to an increase in both theoretical and practical aspectsof audit and audit activity. Modern conditions of the process of Ukraine's integration into the European spacecause the regulatory framework to be adapted to the legislation of the European Union. During the period ofoperation, the national audit system in Ukraine is constantly improving. The article analyzes the normativedocuments and publications of scientists to determine aspects of regulatory regulation of audit in Ukraine inconnection with its integration and the possibility of adapting existing legislation to the legislation of the European Union. The analysis showed that the audit regulatory system in Ukraine is multilevel, but the maindocuments governing audit in the country are the Law "On Audit of Financial Statements and Audit activity"and International Standards for Quality Control, Auditing, Review, Other Assurance and Related Services .The levels of normative-legal regulation of audit and the main differences in the structure of normative actsregulating the implementation of audit and audit activities in Ukraine have been considered.


2021 ◽  
pp. 128
Author(s):  
Valeriia Sopko ◽  
Kateryna Riabchuk

Introduction. Studies of the modern system of mutual settlements of audit companies with clients are becoming more common. This is due to an increase in the number of companies that must conduct an audit in accordance with the legislation of Ukraine. In addition, the number of enterprises that voluntarily choose such a service due to economic instability and crises, including through COVID-19, is also increasing.The purpose of the article is to study the process of building and maintaining the system of settlements of audit companies with clients, determining their real state and development directions.Methods. When studying the process of creating and maintaining a system of mutual settlements of audit companies with clients, general scientific methods of cognition were used - grouping, comparison, analysis, synthesis, etc. Using a systematic approach, the state of audit organizations and the state of the audit services market were assessed. This made it possible to identify the main customers and the specifics of the services they ordered. The empirical method was applied to the information base of the study, in particular, to monitor the normative acts of Ukraine on the audit and audit of financial statements. Comparisons and generalizations of statistical data were used to assess the dynamics of indicators of the volume of audit services and other things.Results. The state of normative-legal regulation of settlements with clients is investigated, its theoretical foundations and gaps are determined. Analyzed the current state, general trends in the development of the audit services market, identified the main groups of clients and their specificity. The cost of one order has been investigated in the context of groups of regions of Ukraine. The degree of influence of COVID-19 on settlements with clients, the market of audit services and the financial condition of audit companies was revealed. The features of standard contracts, forms of payment are revealed. Methods for calculating the cost of an audit and factors influencing their choice have been established. The main external and internal factors influencing the state of settlements of audit companies with clients have been identified.Discussion. In the future, the study should develop in the direction of searching for new types of audit services, including on the basis of international experience, the growth of international cooperation, the intensification of settlements and the provision of services using modern computer technologies.


2021 ◽  
Vol 100 ◽  
pp. 01001
Author(s):  
Karina Nazarova ◽  
Mariia Nezhyva ◽  
Volodymyr Hotsuliak ◽  
Nataliia Novikova ◽  
Oleksandra Fedorenko

The article is devoted to the issues of organization and prospects of audit development in terms of digitalization. The state and the measures needed to improve audit effectiveness in the context of automation are investigated and analyzed. The factors that negatively influence the audit digitization process and the possible directions of development of audit activity in the computerized environment are identified. The use of automation helps auditors process more data and focus on identifying risks, allowing for higher quality audits. Classification of information technology of audit, conditions for the development of audit software, factors that impede audit automation are given. Audit digitization is a new level in the audit field that is rapidly evolving and rapidly expanding in enterprises, especially those that use an automated accounting method. The software currently used by auditors needs to be refined to meet the demands of today's world. Digitization will become relevant for all audit firms seeking to gain competitive advantage and take a place in the audit services market.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (6) ◽  
pp. 42-46
Author(s):  
S.V. DOROZHINSKY ◽  

The article discusses the features of procurement in the framework of the state defense order by conducting trade procedures. The analysis shows that the regulatory framework for state defense orders includes both general acts for the entire public procurement system and special acts regulating relations specifically in the field of defense orders. The features of legal regulation in this sphere are determined, first of all, by the defense order specifics, but, primarily, this sphere as a whole is subject to the rules of legal regulation common to the sphere of public procurement.


10.12737/5942 ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Разиньков ◽  
D. Razinkov ◽  
Михайлов ◽  
I. Mikhaylov ◽  
Михайлова ◽  
...  

In article the legislative base, which is the foundation of functioning of the state system of medical-social examination, is considered and analyzed. The questions of legal regulation of the state activity in the sphere of social policy concerning disabled people are discussed. The methods of sociological research and logical analysis of literature and official normatively-legal papers, being the basis of activity of the system of medico-social examination and sphere of giving to the invalids the equal with other citizens possibilities in realization of constitutional rights and freedoms, public welfare and establishment, are applied to the invalids as the measures of government support. In conclusions the emphasis is placed on need of carrying out radical restructurings for system of medico-social examination. It is offered to modify the existing classification of indexes of health and indexes, related to the health taking into account the socio-economic, climatic and other features; to strength the control of execution of government programs in the medico-social sphere; to modify the traditional classification of groups of disability; to change a way of features accounting of disabled people with various functional violations proceeding from a complex assessment of dysfunction of the neuro-physiological and psycho-physiological statuses; to use the innovative technologies of diagnostics, treatment, rehabilitation in correction of the functional violations with taking in mind not only the nosologic group of disease, but by an individual approach.


Author(s):  
Dina Viktorovna SHEPELEVA ◽  
Olga Vladimirovna POPOVA

Author(s):  
Iryna I. Banasevych ◽  
Ruslana M. Heints ◽  
Mariia V. Lohvinova ◽  
Oksana S. Oliinyk

Theoretical and applied research of the features of the legal status of the subjects of civil law remains debatable today. Doctrinal and legislative analysis of this subject points to unresolved issues in this area. In particular, the provision on defining the state as a party to civil law remains controversial. There is no consensus on the definition of individuals and legal entities as subjects of civil law among scholars. Furthermore, the legal regulation of certain types of entities is somewhat unsystematic and chaotic. This is largely due to the insufficient development of theoretical issues related to the subjects of civil law. The above issues determine the relevance of the study of the features of the legal status of subjects of civil law. The purpose of the study is to investigate the features of the legal status of subjects of civil law based on doctrinal and legislative analysis. The study is based on a systematic approach, which lies in studying a complex system of relationships between subjects of civil law. Furthermore, the study is based on the laws and principles of dialectics, which contribute to the study of the legal status of the subjects of civil law. Systemic and structural-functional analysis was used to comprehensively describe the legal status of subjects of civil law. The historical method contributed to the study of the evolution of research on the subjects of civil law. The formal legal method helped identify the special features of the provisions of regulations concerning the subjects of civil law. With the help of the comparative legal method, the study analysed the provisions of the Civil Code of Ukraine in terms of regulation of subjects of civil law and such regulation was compared with other countries. The study defined the concepts and types of subjects of civil law and considered the features of the legal status of individuals, legal entities, as well as the state as a special participant of civil law. Special attention was paid to the historical analysis of the development of approaches to the definition of subjects of law, starting with Roman law


2021 ◽  
pp. 83-88
Author(s):  
Anna Turenko

Economic sovereignty and its elements are analyzed in the article. It is emphasized that a significant step for rethinking approaches to the characteristics of the sovereignty of the state, in particular, the economic became European integration processes. On the example of tax sovereignty as a basic component of economic sovereignty, it is argued that state sovereignty and its realization depends not only on the right of state to independently decide on tax-legal regulation, but also on the nature of those measures selected by the state to carry out regulatory influences.


2021 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-83
Author(s):  
Andrey Fursov

Currently, public hearings are one of the most widespread forms of deliberative municipal democracy in Russia. This high level of demand, combined with critique of legal regulations and the practices for bringing this system to reality – justified, in the meantime, by its development (for example, by the Agency for Strategic Initiatives and the Public Chambers of the Russian Federation) of proposals for the correction of corresponding elements of the legal code – make both the study of Russian experiences in this sphere and comparative studies of legal regulations and practical usage of public hearings in Russia and abroad extremely relevant. This article is an attempt to make a contribution to this field of scientific study. If the appearance of public hearings in Russia as an institution of Russian municipal law is connected with the passing of the Federal Law of 6 October 2003 No.131-FZ, “On the general organisational principles of local government in the Russian Federation,” then in the United States, this institution has existed since the beginning of the 20th century, with mass adoption beginning in the 1960s. In this time, the United States has accumulated significant practical experience in the use of public hearings and their legal formulation. Both countries are large federal states, with their own regional specifics and diversity, the presence of three levels of public authority and different principles of federalism, which cause differences in the legal regulation of municipal public hearings. For this reason, this article undertakes a comparative legal analysis of Russian and American experiences of legal regulation and practical use of public hearings, on the example of several major municipalities – the cities of Novosibirsk, Nizhny Novgorod, Voronezh and New York, Los Angeles, and Chicago. A comparison of laws influencing the public hearing processes in these cities is advisable, given the colossal growth in the role of city centers in the industrial and post-industrial eras. Cities in particular are the primary centers for economic growth, the spread of innovations, progressive public policy and the living environment for the majority of both Russian and American citizens. The cities under research are one of the largest municipalities in the two countries by population, and on such a scale, the problem of involving residents in solving local issues is especially acute. In this context, improving traditional institutions of public participation is a timely challenge for the legislator, and the experiences of these cities are worth describing. The unique Russian context for legal regulations of public hearings involves the combination of overarching federal law and specific municipal decrees that regulate the hearing process. There are usually two municipal acts regulating public hearings on general issues of the city district (charter, budget, etc.) and separately on urban planning. In the United States, the primary regulation of public hearings is assigned to the state and municipality level, with a whole series of corresponding laws and statutes; meanwhile, methodological recommendations play a specific role in the organisation of hearings, which are issued by the state department of a given state. It is proposed that regulating the corresponding relationships at the federal subject level will permit a combination of the best practices of legal administration with local nuances, thereby reinforcing the guarantee of the realization of civil rights to self-government. There are other features in the process of organizing and conducting public hearings in the United States, which, as shown in the article, can be perceived by Russian lawmakers as well in order to create an updated construct of public discussions at the local level.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document