scholarly journals Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Kejahatan Cyber Bullying di Indonesia

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 59
Author(s):  
Abdul Sakban ◽  
Sahrul Sahrul ◽  
Andi Kasmawati ◽  
Heri Tahir
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Police Officers ◽  
Industrial Revolution ◽  
Hate Speech ◽  
Law Enforcement Officers ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Cyber Bullying ◽  
Legal Issue ◽  
The Republic

Terjadinya kejahatan tersebut adalah kurangnya kontribusi penegak hukum dalam melakukan pengawasan dilingkungan sekolah, masyarakat, keluarga, dan diri pribadi dalam melakukan interaksi baik di media online maupun offline. Selain itu, kurangnya pemahaman aparat kepolisian dalam mengimplementasikan esensi Surat Edaran Hate Speech Republik Indonesia, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP). Tujuan yang akan dicapai dalam artikel ini adalah kebijakan hukum pidana terhadap kejahatan cyber-bullying di Indonesia, dan kebijakan hukum kriminal untuk era revolusi industri 4.0 dalam menyelesaikan kejahatan cyber-bullying. Penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian yuridis normative yang bersifat kualitatif. Pengumpulan bahan-bahan hukum dilakukan dengan mengidentifikasi dan menginventarisasi peraturan perundang- undangan, meneliti bahan pustaka, dan sumber-sumber bahan hukum lainnya. Teknik analisis isu hukum (legal issue) dalam penelitian ini menggunakan logika berpikir campuran. Maksudnya penalaran (hukum) yang merupakan gabungan dari pola pikir induktif (inductive) dan deduktif (deductive) dalam persoalan hukum faktual yang konkrit. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kebijakan hukum pidana dalam menyelesaikan kejahatan cyber-bullying dapat terapkan oleh aparat penegak hukum berupa KUHP dan Undang-Undang No. 8 Tahun 2018 tentang Informasi Teknologi Elektronik dengan melihat isi penjelasan pasal demi pasal dan konten kejahatan yang dilakukan oleh pelaku. Kebijakan hukum Pidana di era revolusi industry 4.0 tetap mengacu pada aturan yang berlaku di Indonesia. The occurrence of such crimes is the lack of law enforcement contributions in conducting supervision in school, community, family, and personal self in the interaction of both online and offline media. In addition, the lack of understanding of police officers in implementing the essence of circular Hate Speech of the Republic of Indonesia, the Criminal Code of Law (PENAL). The objectives to be achieved in this article are the policy of criminal law against cyber-bullying crimes in Indonesia, and the policy of criminal law for the era of the 4.0 industrial revolution in resolving cyber-bullying crimes. This research uses normative juridical research that is qualitative. The collection of legal materials is done by identifying and invarizing the legislation, examining the library materials, and other sources of legal materials. Technical analysis of legal issues in this study used mixed-thinking logic. It means reasoning (the law) which is a combination of inductive (inductive) and deductive mindset in the case of a concrete factual law. The results showed that criminal law policies in resolving cyber-bullying crimes could be applied by law enforcement officers in the form of penal CODE and law No. 8 year 2018 on electronic technology information by looking at the contents Article-by-article explanations and crime content committed by the perpetrator. The criminal Law policy in the 4.0 Industrial Revolution era continues to refer to the prevailing rules in Indonesia

scholarly journals Improvement of the criminal law norm on unlawful obtaining of a credit in the Republic of Tajikistan (article 264 of the Criminal code of the Republic of Tajikistan)

2019 ◽  
pp. 275-278
Author(s):  
Neru Mahmadzoda
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Law Enforcement Officers ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic

This article is devoted to one of the topical issues of law — the improvement of the criminal law on unlawful obtaining of a credit (article 264 of the Criminal code of the Republic of Tajikistan). The article considers such problems as the correct formation of the text of the law in order to avoid ambiguity in the understanding of socially significant norms. In addition, it is noted upon the presence of a gap in the knowledge of law enforcement officers of blanket norms and concepts, reflected in the norm on illegal obtaining of a credit. It should be noted that the results of the study also demonstrate the relevance of issues in credit relations, including disproportion of fines in the sanctions of article 264 of the Criminal code of the Republic of Tajikistan to committed crimes and inclusion of such punishment as confiscation of property.

scholarly journals Criminal liability for illegal banking activities in the context of countering criminal money cashing

2020 ◽  
pp. 140-144
Author(s):  
Dmitry Ovchinnikov
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Public Relations ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Tax Evasion ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Law Enforcement Officers ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Economic Sector ◽  
The Russian Federation

Currently, the economic sector of public relations is characterized by exceptional criminality. One of the main phenomena responsible for this is illegal money cashing. Almost every business entity considers it acceptable and even necessary to resort to various criminal schemes for obtaining unaccounted cash and tax evasion. The very type of this crime has actually become a thriving and profitable business, which consists in providing services for withdrawing funds from legal circulation. While the existing judicial and investigative practice in the issue of countering this phenomenon has not yet developed a clear answer about the need for appropriate qualifications. There are about a dozen articles of the criminal law in which law enforcement officers try to find the correct legal assessment, and at present, article 172 of the Criminal code of the Russian Federation “Illegal banking activities” deserves special attention.

Legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan Regarding Criminal Infractions and the Law Enforcement Practice

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 194
Author(s):  
Aibar S. NURKHAN
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
World Economy ◽  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Comparison Analysis ◽  
State Administration ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic

Studying of issues regarding criminal infractions – whether intended or imprudent – plays quite a significant role. Fundamental changes taking part in world economy and politics, globalization processes, as well as internal dynamics of country development, undoubtedly, have impact on national legal framework, including criminal law. Therefore, the main goal of the present paper is the analysis of legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan regarding criminal infractions and the law enforcement practice. To reach this goal authors have used methods of comparison, analysis and data systematization. As a result it has been found that in Kazakhstan there are at average 4,3 registered criminal infractions per a convict. The term of criminal infraction has appeared in the Criminal Code in 2014 to cover offences of small gravity and administrative violations that cannot be referred to the sphere of state administration. Authors have revealed the punishment in the present day Kazakhstan is not a main form of criminal responsibility realization. In the majority of cases linked to criminal infractions the persons committed them are relieved from criminal responsibility at the stage of prejudicial inquiry.

Das neue Widerstandsstrafrecht

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanik Bolender
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
State Power ◽  
Law Enforcement Officers ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Rescue Workers

Can resistance to state power continue to be punished less than general coercion? In 2017 the legislature passed the 52nd StÄG to improve the protection of law enforcement officers and rescue workers, which essentially changed Sections 113, 114, 115, 323c of the Criminal Code. From a criminal law perspective, this led to this and other controversial questions in the context of the interpretation of these amended standards. What they look like in detail and what effects they have is extensively examined in this work. In particular, the questions of how the preconditions for the offense are to be interpreted and how their relationship to one another and to other criminal norms is represented are particularly addressed.

PENANGANAN TINDAK PIDANA PEMILIHAN UMUM KEPALA DAERAH BERKAITAN DENGAN PRINSIP NEGARA HUKUM DAN DEMOKRASI

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Ikhwan Rahman
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Local Elections ◽  
Complex Problems ◽  
Post Conflict ◽  
The People ◽  
Legal Sanctions ◽  
General Elections ◽  
The Republic

AbstractLaw No.10 of 2016 concerning the Election of Governors, Regents and Mayors has included criminal provisions in Chapter XXIV, of course very much more complete when compared to the criminal provisions stipulated in the Criminal Code concerning crimes against carrying out obligations and rights which are classified certain acts, but the Criminal Code is deemed no longer relevant due to the increasingly complex problems in terms of the enforcement of criminal elections and post-conflict local elections. The essence of law enforcement itself can be interpreted as an act of implementing certain legal means to impose legal sanctions to ensure compliance with a rule. So that the mandate of Article 1 paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia states that "sovereignty is in the hands of the people and carried out according to the Constitution" reflecting democratically the regional head elections as expected.Keywords: Criminal Law Enforcement of Regional Head General Elections, State of Law and DemocracyAbstrakUndang-Undang No.10 Tahun 2016 tentang Pemilihan Gubernur, Bupati dan Walikota telah memasukkan ketentuan pidana dalam Bab XXIV, tentu saja sangat jauh lebih lengkap jika dibandingkan dengan ketentuan pidana yang diatur dalam KUHPidana tentang kejahatan terhadap melakukan kewajiban dan hak kenegaraan yang dimana memiliki klasifikasi perbuatan tertentu, namun KUHPidana dianggap tidak lagi relevan akibat semakin kompleksnya persoalan-persoalan dalam hal penegakan pidana pemilu dan pemilukada. Esensi dari penegakan hukum itu sendiri yang bisa dimaknai sebagai tindakan menerapkan perangkat sarana hukum tertentu untuk memaksakan sanksi hukum agar menjamin pentaatan terhadap suatu aturan. Sehingga    amanat Pasal 1 ayat (2) Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 menyatakan bahwa “kedaulatan berada di tangan rakyat dan dilaksanakan menurut Undang-Undang Dasar” yang refleksikan melalui pemilihan umum kepala daerah secara demokratis berjalan sesuai yang diharapkan.Kata Kunci: Penegakan Hukum Pidana Pemilukada, Negara Hukum dan Demokrasi

Criminal law. General part

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivan Dvoryanskov ◽  
Elena Antonyan ◽  
Sergey Borovikov ◽  
Natal'ya Bugera ◽  
Aleksandr Grishko ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Law Enforcement Officers ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Federal State ◽  
General Part ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
State Educational ◽  
Criminal Legislation

The textbook is prepared in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, federal laws, international legal acts. The concepts, categories and institutions of the General Part of criminal Law are considered in detail. All changes in the criminal legislation have been taken into account, and the latest scientific, educational and methodological literature on criminal law has been used. The material is presented in an accessible form for effective assimilation of the training course. The publication contains regulatory legal material as of May 1, 2021. Meets the federal state educational standards of higher education of the latest generation in the areas of training 40.03.01 "Jurisprudence", 40.05.01 "Legal support of national security", 40.05.02 "Law enforcement", 40.05.03 "Forensic examination", 40.05.04 "Judicial and prosecutorial activities". For students, cadets, trainees studying in these areas of training, judges, law enforcement officers, as well as for anyone interested in criminal law issues.

scholarly journals PENTINGNYA RESTORATIVE JUSTICE DALAM KONSEP IUS CONSTITUENDUM

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 253
Author(s):  
Zico Junius Fernando
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
District Court ◽  
Long Distance ◽  
Law System ◽  
Compensation Mechanisms ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Republic

Abstract: The State of Indonesia is a state of law, the affirmation of this can be seen in Article 1 paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. The settlement of cases through the judicial system which results in a court verdict is law enforcement towards the slow path. This is because law enforcement through a long-distance, through various levels starting from the Police, Attorney General's Office, District Court, High Court and even to the Supreme Court which ultimately has an impact on the accumulation of cases which are not small in number in the Court and not to mention other effects. For this reason, it is necessary to proceed with the steps to compile invitations concerning the rights and obligations of citizens in the context of implementing the Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution. Renewal of the Criminal Code by its authors is positioned as the foundation for building a national criminal law system. Related to the Political Law of Criminal Law Renewal in the upcoming National Criminal Law there is a concept known as the Restorative Justice concept. Restorative Justice involves restoring relations between the victim and the perpetrator. The restoration of this relationship can be based on mutual agreement between the victim and the perpetrator. The victim can convey about the loss he suffered and the perpetrator was given the opportunity to make it up, through compensation mechanisms, peace, social work, and other agreements. Keywords: Restorative Justice; Legal Reform; RKUHP

scholarly journals THE NORMATIVE RESOLUTION OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN “ON THE PRACTICE OF THE COURTS APPLYING THE CRIMINAL LAW IN CASES OF CRIMES RELATED TO VIOLATION OF THE RULES OF THE ROAD AND THE OPERATION OF VEHICLES” DATED JUNE 29, 2011, AND THE CRIMINAL LAW

2020 ◽  
pp. 69-75
Author(s):  
K.A. Bakishev
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Criminal Offence ◽  
The Road ◽  
Regulatory Decision ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Sufficient Degree ◽  
The Republic

The Concept of the legal policy of the Republic of Kazakhstan for the period from 2010 to 2020emphasizes that the criminal law must meet the requirements of legal accuracy and predictability ofconsequences, that is, its norms must be formulated with a sufficient degree of clarity and based on clearcriteria that exclude the possibility of arbitrary interpretation provisions of the law. Meanwhile, an analysisof the Criminal Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan shows that some articles on liability for road transportoffences are designed poorly. For example, Art. 346 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan ischaracterized by a combination of formal and qualified corpus delicti, as well as two forms of guilt — intentand negligence; in Art. 351 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan, the circle of subjects of thecriminal offence was significantly reduced due to the unjustified exclusion of drivers of non-mechanicalvehicles. As a result, the Supreme Court of the Republic of Kazakhstan in the regulatory decree «On thepractice of the courts applying the criminal law in cases of crimes related to violation of the rules of theroad and the operation of vehicles’ of June 29, 2011 made a number of errors and contradictions that led todifficulties in qualifying the criminal offence and the appointment criminal punishment. Taking into accountthe law-enforcement and legislative experience of Kazakhstan and other countries in the field of ensuringtraffic safety, the author proposes amendments and additions to the named regulatory decision of theSupreme Court of the Republic of Kazakhstan to improve its quality and improve law enforcement practice.

CRIMINAL SUBCULTURE AS A CONDITION OF CRIMINAL INCULTURATION OF PENAL OFFICERS OF RUSSIA AND ISSUES OF COUNTERING IT

2021 ◽  
pp. 51-57
Author(s):  
Сергей Владимирович Расторопов ◽  
Ксения Валерьевна Брежнева
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Law Enforcement Officers ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Mutual Respect ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
Official Position ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Russian Law ◽  
Everyday Communication

В данной статье авторы раскрывают проблему противодействия профессиональной деформации сотрудников правоохранительных органов путем их приобщения к тюремной субкультуре, идеологии «АУЕ» (криминальная инкультурация) начиная от зарождения девиантных мыслей до совершения преступлений, а также рассматривают некоторые вопросы детерминации и профилактики данного явления. Авторы отмечают, что приобщение сотрудников правоохранительной системы России к идеям криминального мира является следствием одного из направлений тщательно продуманной деятельности криминальных авторитетов, находящихся как в местах лишения свободы, так и на свободе, в отношении действующих сотрудников силовых структур. В статье рассматривается возможность привлечения сотрудников к ответственности по ч. 3 ст. 282. 2 УК РФ (Участие в деятельности экстремистской организации с использованием лицом своего служебного положения). Авторами подчеркивается важность уголовно-правового предупреждения в рассматриваемом вопросе. В заключение авторы отмечают необходимость четкого разграничения таких неприемлемых идейных взгляды сотрудников ведомственных структур, как принятие, тяготение, приобщение, поддержание, потворствование, распространение и привнесение в служебно-деловое и бытовое общение норм тюремной субкультуры, с общечеловеческими понятиями: сочувствием, пониманием, сопереживанием, чуткостью, взаимоуважением, взаимопомощью, которые также могут проявляться в работе и с лицами, совершившими преступления. In this article, the author reveals the problem of professional deformation of law enforcement officers by introducing them to the prison subculture, the ideology of «AUE» (criminal inculturation), starting from the inception of deviant thoughts to the commission of crimes by them, and also considers some issues of the determination and prevention of this phenomenon. The authors note that the introduction of the Russian law enforcement system to the ideas of the criminal world is a consequence of one of the directions of carefully thought-out activities of criminal authorities, both in places of imprisonment and at large, in relation to the current employees of law enforcement agencies. The article considers the possibility of bringing employees to responsibility under Part 3 of Article 282.2 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (Participation in the activities of an extremist organization using a person's official position). The authors emphasize the importance of criminal law prevention in the issue under consideration. In conclusion, the authors note the need for a clear distinction between such unacceptable ideological views of employees of departmental structures as acceptance, attraction, communion, maintenance, indulgence, dissemination and introduction into official, business and everyday communication of the norms of the prison subculture, with universal concepts: sympathy, understanding, empathy, sensitivity, mutual respect, mutual assistance, which can also manifest themselves in working with persons who have committed crimes.

scholarly journals Deviant behavior of employees of internal affairs bodies: experience of dialectical assessment

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (1) ◽  
pp. 151-163
Author(s):  
Sergey Milyukov ◽  
Andrey Nikulenko
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Police Officers ◽  
Deviant Behavior ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Law Enforcement Officers ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Practical Implementation ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
The Right

In modern Russia, the problem of countering socially dangerous manifestations acts as a national project that proclaims the right of citizens to safe living conditions. Much attention is paid to the ability of law enforcement officers to resist criminal expansion legally, to be able to protect themselves and others by means of legal use of force against persons who commit socially dangerous encroachments. Guided by the concept of deviance, the authors made an attempt to analyze the problem of lawful behavior by law enforcement officers, primarily police officers. The researchers came to a reasonable conclusion about the need to adjust the current state of affairs. The legislation and the practice of its application cannot satisfy the interests of representatives of law enforcement agencies engaged in official activities for the protection of public order and ensuring of public safety. Imperfect legislation is the main reason of deviant behavior of police officers who are in permanent stress situations. Their abundance also provokes deviant behavior of police officers, which sometimes manifests itself in extreme brutality towards lawbreakers. From our point of view, the current norms of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, primarily the norms of Chapter 8, are not clear enough. Moreover, their legislative wording is far from being perfect and gives the opportunity to shift the blame for causing harm to persons who do it in circumstances that exclude the criminality of the act. The proposed careful adjustment of the norms of criminal legislation will significantly increase the effectiveness of their practical implementation, instill confidence in the consciousness of police officers about the importance and possibility of offensive legitimate steps to influence crime, as well as to increase their legal protection.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document