Das neue Widerstandsstrafrecht

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanik Bolender

Can resistance to state power continue to be punished less than general coercion? In 2017 the legislature passed the 52nd StÄG to improve the protection of law enforcement officers and rescue workers, which essentially changed Sections 113, 114, 115, 323c of the Criminal Code. From a criminal law perspective, this led to this and other controversial questions in the context of the interpretation of these amended standards. What they look like in detail and what effects they have is extensively examined in this work. In particular, the questions of how the preconditions for the offense are to be interpreted and how their relationship to one another and to other criminal norms is represented are particularly addressed.

Author(s):  
Dmitry Ovchinnikov

Currently, the economic sector of public relations is characterized by exceptional criminality. One of the main phenomena responsible for this is illegal money cashing. Almost every business entity considers it acceptable and even necessary to resort to various criminal schemes for obtaining unaccounted cash and tax evasion. The very type of this crime has actually become a thriving and profitable business, which consists in providing services for withdrawing funds from legal circulation. While the existing judicial and investigative practice in the issue of countering this phenomenon has not yet developed a clear answer about the need for appropriate qualifications. There are about a dozen articles of the criminal law in which law enforcement officers try to find the correct legal assessment, and at present, article 172 of the Criminal code of the Russian Federation “Illegal banking activities” deserves special attention.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivan Dvoryanskov ◽  
Elena Antonyan ◽  
Sergey Borovikov ◽  
Natal'ya Bugera ◽  
Aleksandr Grishko ◽  
...  

The textbook is prepared in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, federal laws, international legal acts. The concepts, categories and institutions of the General Part of criminal Law are considered in detail. All changes in the criminal legislation have been taken into account, and the latest scientific, educational and methodological literature on criminal law has been used. The material is presented in an accessible form for effective assimilation of the training course. The publication contains regulatory legal material as of May 1, 2021. Meets the federal state educational standards of higher education of the latest generation in the areas of training 40.03.01 "Jurisprudence", 40.05.01 "Legal support of national security", 40.05.02 "Law enforcement", 40.05.03 "Forensic examination", 40.05.04 "Judicial and prosecutorial activities". For students, cadets, trainees studying in these areas of training, judges, law enforcement officers, as well as for anyone interested in criminal law issues.


Author(s):  
Abdul Sakban ◽  
Sahrul Sahrul ◽  
Andi Kasmawati ◽  
Heri Tahir

Terjadinya kejahatan tersebut adalah kurangnya kontribusi penegak hukum dalam melakukan pengawasan dilingkungan sekolah, masyarakat, keluarga, dan diri pribadi dalam melakukan interaksi baik di media online maupun offline. Selain itu, kurangnya pemahaman aparat kepolisian dalam mengimplementasikan esensi Surat Edaran Hate Speech Republik Indonesia, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP). Tujuan yang akan dicapai dalam artikel ini adalah kebijakan hukum pidana terhadap kejahatan cyber-bullying di Indonesia, dan kebijakan hukum kriminal untuk era revolusi industri 4.0 dalam menyelesaikan kejahatan cyber-bullying. Penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian yuridis normative yang bersifat kualitatif. Pengumpulan bahan-bahan hukum dilakukan dengan mengidentifikasi dan menginventarisasi peraturan perundang- undangan, meneliti bahan pustaka, dan sumber-sumber bahan hukum lainnya. Teknik analisis isu hukum (legal issue) dalam penelitian ini menggunakan logika berpikir campuran. Maksudnya penalaran (hukum) yang merupakan gabungan dari pola pikir induktif (inductive) dan deduktif (deductive) dalam persoalan hukum faktual yang konkrit. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kebijakan hukum pidana dalam menyelesaikan kejahatan cyber-bullying dapat terapkan oleh aparat penegak hukum berupa KUHP dan Undang-Undang No. 8 Tahun 2018 tentang Informasi Teknologi Elektronik dengan melihat isi penjelasan pasal demi pasal dan konten kejahatan yang dilakukan oleh pelaku. Kebijakan hukum Pidana di era revolusi industry 4.0 tetap mengacu pada aturan yang berlaku di Indonesia. The occurrence of such crimes is the lack of law enforcement contributions in conducting supervision in school, community, family, and personal self in the interaction of both online and offline media. In addition, the lack of understanding of police officers in implementing the essence of circular Hate Speech of the Republic of Indonesia, the Criminal Code of Law (PENAL). The objectives to be achieved in this article are the policy of criminal law against cyber-bullying crimes in Indonesia, and the policy of criminal law for the era of the 4.0 industrial revolution in resolving cyber-bullying crimes. This research uses normative juridical research that is qualitative. The collection of legal materials is done by identifying and invarizing the legislation, examining the library materials, and other sources of legal materials. Technical analysis of legal issues in this study used mixed-thinking logic. It means reasoning (the law) which is a combination of inductive (inductive) and deductive mindset in the case of a concrete factual law. The results showed that criminal law policies in resolving cyber-bullying crimes could be applied by law enforcement officers in the form of penal CODE and law No. 8 year 2018 on electronic technology information by looking at the contents Article-by-article explanations and crime content committed by the perpetrator. The criminal Law policy in the 4.0 Industrial Revolution era continues to refer to the prevailing rules in Indonesia


Author(s):  
Сергей Владимирович Расторопов ◽  
Ксения Валерьевна Брежнева

В данной статье авторы раскрывают проблему противодействия профессиональной деформации сотрудников правоохранительных органов путем их приобщения к тюремной субкультуре, идеологии «АУЕ» (криминальная инкультурация) начиная от зарождения девиантных мыслей до совершения преступлений, а также рассматривают некоторые вопросы детерминации и профилактики данного явления. Авторы отмечают, что приобщение сотрудников правоохранительной системы России к идеям криминального мира является следствием одного из направлений тщательно продуманной деятельности криминальных авторитетов, находящихся как в местах лишения свободы, так и на свободе, в отношении действующих сотрудников силовых структур. В статье рассматривается возможность привлечения сотрудников к ответственности по ч. 3 ст. 282. 2 УК РФ (Участие в деятельности экстремистской организации с использованием лицом своего служебного положения). Авторами подчеркивается важность уголовно-правового предупреждения в рассматриваемом вопросе. В заключение авторы отмечают необходимость четкого разграничения таких неприемлемых идейных взгляды сотрудников ведомственных структур, как принятие, тяготение, приобщение, поддержание, потворствование, распространение и привнесение в служебно-деловое и бытовое общение норм тюремной субкультуры, с общечеловеческими понятиями: сочувствием, пониманием, сопереживанием, чуткостью, взаимоуважением, взаимопомощью, которые также могут проявляться в работе и с лицами, совершившими преступления. In this article, the author reveals the problem of professional deformation of law enforcement officers by introducing them to the prison subculture, the ideology of «AUE» (criminal inculturation), starting from the inception of deviant thoughts to the commission of crimes by them, and also considers some issues of the determination and prevention of this phenomenon. The authors note that the introduction of the Russian law enforcement system to the ideas of the criminal world is a consequence of one of the directions of carefully thought-out activities of criminal authorities, both in places of imprisonment and at large, in relation to the current employees of law enforcement agencies. The article considers the possibility of bringing employees to responsibility under Part 3 of Article 282.2 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (Participation in the activities of an extremist organization using a person's official position). The authors emphasize the importance of criminal law prevention in the issue under consideration. In conclusion, the authors note the need for a clear distinction between such unacceptable ideological views of employees of departmental structures as acceptance, attraction, communion, maintenance, indulgence, dissemination and introduction into official, business and everyday communication of the norms of the prison subculture, with universal concepts: sympathy, understanding, empathy, sensitivity, mutual respect, mutual assistance, which can also manifest themselves in working with persons who have committed crimes.


2020 ◽  
pp. 169-173
Author(s):  
N. M. Plysiuk

Questions about the peculiarities of the responsibility of a law enforcement officer for committing a premeditated murder in the performance of their duties in the context of necessary defense and detention of a criminal are explored. In the science of criminal law, one of the debates is the question of recognizing the subjects of premeditated killings when exceeding the limits of the necessary defense and when exceeding the measures necessary to detain the offender of law enforcement officers. In criminal law, there are several points of view regarding the qualification of actions of a police officer in causing them harm to the detained person and in the necessary defense. What are the causes of death in case of exceeding the limits of necessary defense or in case of exceeding the measures necessary for the detention of a person who committed a socially dangerous assault by a law enforcement officer – intentional murder if the limits of necessary defense are exceeded, or in case of exceeding the measures necessary for detention power or authority. When deciding on the responsibility of a law enforcement officer in the conditions of necessary defense and detention of the perpetrator, it is necessary to establish: whether the requirements of the sectoral legislation regarding the grounds for the use of weapons, special means and physical influence measures have been met, and whether the requirement that “in case of impossibility to avoid the use of force, it shall not exceed the extent necessary to fulfill the duties assigned to the police and shall minimize the possibility of harming the offender's health to members of the public”. In compliance with both requirements, liability is excluded – such acts are not criminal. In case of non-compliance with such requirements, a law enforcement officer should be criminally responsible for a crime in the field of official activity. In addition, one should not forget that one of the conditions for the lawfulness of causing harm to a person in detention is the time of detention – immediately after the commission of the encroachment. With this in mind, in the deliberate killing of a detainee immediately after committing an encroachment on him, the actions of a law enforcement officer should be qualified under Art. 118 of the Criminal Code, and in the case of a similar act, if the detained person, for example, is wanted, for a similar crime – no. In such a case there will be, in the presence of signs, excess of power (Article 365 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine).


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 9-10
Author(s):  
Stanislav Eftemij

The theoretical and practical difficulties in using criminal law measures against law enforcement officers who exceed power or official authority are studied here. The types of law enforcement agencies of Ukraine are clarified, and the signs of division of their system are described. The criteria for determining the status of law enforcement officers are established, and the features that distinguish an official from the support staff are emphasized. Finally, the most common disadvantages enshrined in the Criminal Code of Ukraine in terms of liability for abuse of power or official authority by law enforcement officers are analysed. The concepts of law enforcement officers, persons carrying out law enforcement activities, persons endowed with law enforcement powers, executors of law enforcement functions and the meaning and instances of their application in domestic legislation are also investigated. In light of the study results and the requirements of current criminal law, including the positions of criminal law scholars, suggestions for possible ways to eliminate existing regulatory shortcomings are provided.


Author(s):  
Neru Mahmadzoda

This article is devoted to one of the topical issues of law — the improvement of the criminal law on unlawful obtaining of a credit (article 264 of the Criminal code of the Republic of Tajikistan). The article considers such problems as the correct formation of the text of the law in order to avoid ambiguity in the understanding of socially significant norms. In addition, it is noted upon the presence of a gap in the knowledge of law enforcement officers of blanket norms and concepts, reflected in the norm on illegal obtaining of a credit. It should be noted that the results of the study also demonstrate the relevance of issues in credit relations, including disproportion of fines in the sanctions of article 264 of the Criminal code of the Republic of Tajikistan to committed crimes and inclusion of such punishment as confiscation of property.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 35-39
Author(s):  
Efraim Mbomba Reda ◽  
I Nyoman Putu Budiartha ◽  
I Made Minggu Widyantara

Progressive law puts forward the sociology of law rather than legal certainty which is the focus of legal positivism. In Indonesia, this law was coined by Satjipto Rahardjo. This study aims to determine the formulation of progressive law in future criminal law, and to determine the actualization of the concept of progressive law in regulating corruption in Indonesia. The research method used is a normative legal research method with statute and conceptual approaches. The technique of collecting legal materials in this study is a descriptive method that aims to obtain the meaning of reality related to the problems to be discussed and solved in this study. The results show that in the current Criminal Code Bill, progressive law has been regulated, to be precise in Article 2 paragraph (1) and (2). Progressive law is also regulated in Law no. 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power. Then, the actualization of progressive law in regulating corruption in Indonesia is a judge with the powers that take into account the sociological context of society in making decisions. Judges, prosecutors and lawyers can certainly discuss together in eradicating corruption. Efforts are also being made to reconstruct and redefine the power of law enforcement. This arrangement can also encourage the KPK to be more progressive in eradicating corruption, as well as building law enforcers who have morality so that they can become role models and increase public participation, for example by forming NGOs in preventing or fighting corruption in various agencies.


Author(s):  
Т.Л. Магомадова ◽  
З.Л. Магомадова

В статье рассматриваются уголовно-правовые нормы, содержащиеся в гл. 26 УК РФ, устанавливающие ответственность за экологические преступления с точки зрения определения причин их низкой применяемости в судебной практике. Выделены наиболее актуальные уголовно-правовые проблемы, раскрыт ряд вопросов эффективности применения норм об ответственности за экологические преступления и проиллюстрированы ключевые моменты примерами правоприменительной практики, предложены пути законодательного их разрешения. The article discusses the criminal law contained in Sec. 26 of the Criminal Code, establishing liability for environmental crimes in terms of determining the causes of their low applicability in judicial practice. The most relevant criminal law problems are highlighted, a number of issues of the effectiveness of the application of the rules on liability for environmental crimes are revealed, key points are illustrated with examples of law enforcement practice, and ways to legislatively resolve them are proposed.


Author(s):  
Michail Sagandykov ◽  
Galia Shafikova

The relevance of the study is based, on the one hand, on high public danger of crimes in the sphere of labor relations and, on the other hand, on a very low interest of law enforcement, control and supervision bodies in these crimes. The authors show that modern criminal legislation in the sphere of protecting labor rights has a high potential in comparison with both Soviet and foreign criminal law norms. At the same time, this potential, primarily expressed in Chapter 19 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, remains untapped. Many norms, including Art. 136 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation «Violating the Equality of Rights and Freedoms of Man and Citizen», are virtually never used against discrimination in the labor sphere, although such discrimination is quite common. No such cases have been found in court statistical data, thus it is impossible to provide a comprehensive criminological description of these crimes. The norm of Art. 136 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation is seldom used by law enforcers because it is legally ambiguous. In this connection the authors suggest complementing the disposition of Art. 136 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation with such factors of discrimination as «age» and «marital status». The latter factor will make it possible to provide extra protection to pregnant women and women with children under three years old against unmotivated refusal of employment and firing. The authors argue that such actions of the employer should constitute an aggregate of crimes and should be punished simultaneously under Art. 136 and 145 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. At the same time, the authors think that it is not appropriate to make the disposition of Art. 136 a blanket one due to vague grounds for discrimination in special legislation, including labor legislation. The obtained results could be used for the improvement of Russian legislation based on theoretical research and the practice of law enforcement.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document