scholarly journals Independence, Time Budget Pressure, Audit Fee and Workload on Audit Quality as The Impact of Covid-19

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 67-76
Author(s):  
Ida Ayu Budhananda Munidewi ◽  
Ni Made Sunarsih ◽  
Ida Ayu Made Widyantari

This study aims to determine the effect of independence, time budget pressure, audit fees, workload on audit quality as the impact of Covid-19 pandemic on audit firms registered in IAPI Bali. The population of this research are all auditors in 16 audit firms registered in IAPI Bali. This research involved 114 respondents selected by a purposive sampling method with criteria of one-year minimum of service in audit firms. The data were analyzed with multiple linear regression. The results showed that independence has a positive significant effect on audit quality; time budget pressure, audit fees and workloads have no significant effect on audit quality.

2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-99
Author(s):  
Carl W. Hollingsworth ◽  
Terry L. Neal ◽  
Colin D. Reid

SUMMARY While prior research has examined audit firm and audit partner rotation, we have little evidence on the impact of within-firm engagement team disruptions on the audit. To examine these disruptions, we identify a unique sample of companies where the audit firm issuing office changed but the audit firm did not change and investigate the effect of these changes on the audit. Our results indicate that companies that have a change in their audit firm's issuing office exhibit a decrease in audit quality and an increase in audit fees. In additional analysis, we partition office changes into two groups—client driven changes and audit firm driven changes. This analysis reveals that client driven changes are more likely to result in a higher audit fee while audit quality is unchanged. Conversely, audit firm driven changes do not result in a higher audit fee but do experience a decrease in audit quality.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 87-101
Author(s):  
Hamzah Ahmad ◽  
Hajering Hajering ◽  
Muslim Muslim ◽  
Alma Pratiwi

This study aims to examine the effect of time budget pressure and audit fees on audit quality with emotional intelligence as a moderating variable. The data in this study were obtained from BPKP South Sulawesi Province representatives who were willing to become respondents. This study uses primary data by conducting direct research in the field by giving questionnaires / question sheets to 112 respondents. The data analysis method uses the SmartPLS approach to examine the effect of time budget pressure and audit fees on audit quality with emotional intelligence as a moderating variable. The results showed that the time budget pressure variable had a negative and significant effect on audit quality; audit fees have a positive and not significant effect on audit quality; emotional intelligence can strengthen the relationship of time budget pressure to audit quality; and emotional intelligence cannot strengthen the audit fee relationship to audit quality


2019 ◽  
pp. 563
Author(s):  
Ayu Alit Cita Dewi ◽  
I Wayan Ramantha

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of professionalism and time budget pressure on audit quality with audit fees as moderating variables. This research was conducted at 9 Public Accountant Offices in Bali Province. The number of samples used was 45 respondents. The method of determining the sample is nonprobability sampling with a saturated sample technique. Data collection is done by questionnaire. The analysis technique in this study uses the analysis of Moderated Regression Analysis (MRA). The results of the analysis show that professionalism has a positive effect on audit quality and time budget pressure has a negative effect on audit quality. This study also found that audit fees strengthened the influence of professionalism on audit quality and audit fees weakened the influence of time budget pressure on audit quality. Keywords: professionalism, time budget pressure, audit fee, and audit quality


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-55
Author(s):  
Wasiu Ajani Musa ◽  
Ramat Titilayo Salman ◽  
Ibrahim Olayiwola Amoo ◽  
Muhammed Lawal Subair

Greater pricing presume on audit service has been put by the regulations of the auditing and accounting practices for the disclosure of audit fees, since audit fee is directly related to audit quality. However, the audit fees perceived by the client is often different from the amount charged by the auditors. Hence, this study investigated the impact of firm-specific characteristics on audit fees of quoted consumer goods firms in Nigeria using a purposive sampling technique. Secondary data were obtained from annual reports of the companies for the period from 2009-2016. The empirical result from Breusch-Pagan Lagrange Multiplier Test (BP-LM) produced a chi-square value of 13.94 with p-value of 0.0001 indicating that pooled ordinary least squares (OLS) will not be appropriate for the study. The Hausman test showed a chi-square of 23.55 with a p-value of 0.001 indicating that the null hypothesis is strongly rejected. Thus, the only estimate from the fixed effect model was interpreted to explain the relationship between firm-specific characteristics and audit fees of quoted consumer goods firms in Nigeria. The result revealed that auditee size, auditee risk, auditee profitability and IFRS adoption are the firm specific characteristics that impact on audit fees with only auditee size and IFRS adoption being positively related to audit fees while the other factors are negatively related to audit fees. Based on this finding, this study concluded that the firm’s specific factors are the major drivers of audit fees in Nigeria consumer goods firms. This study recommends among others that companies should implement corporate governance principles that address issues relating to board independence and committee sizes to guide activities in the consumer goods sector since profitability behave negatively with audit fees.


2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 913-930
Author(s):  
Shaban Mohammadi ◽  
Nader Naghshbandi ◽  
Zahra Moridahmadibezdi

Purpose The purpose of the present study is to investigate the impact of audit features, including audit quality, audit fees and auditor tenure on money laundering in Iranian stock companies. Design/methodology/approach This research is descriptive-correlational and applied in terms of purpose. To evaluate the audit features, variables including audit quality, audit fee and auditor tenure were used. The statistical population of this study includes all companies listed in Tehran Stock Exchange and the research period from 2012 to 2018. A sample of 150 companies was selected by the screening method. In this study, logistic regression and Eviews 10 software were used for data analysis and hypothesis testing. Findings The results showed that variables including audit quality, normal audit fee and auditor tenure have a significant effect on money laundering. Originality/value Observing money laundering rules and regulations for businesses involves is a critical issue. In auditing the financial statements of the business units subject to these laws, the auditor reviews their actions to obtain reasonable assurance of guaranteeing the money laundering laws, evaluates their effectiveness and gains approval of managers regarding observing laundering regulations. In this regard, the auditor is required to report definitive or suspected money-laundering cases or its certain or suspected evidence to the relevant authorities. Although the law prohibits the auditor from disclosing such matters to the client, it is not necessary. It seems that even if the auditors perform non-audit functions, they should report money laundering or suspicious operations and transactions.


2019 ◽  
pp. 651
Author(s):  
I Gusti Diah Agung Prabawati Suteja ◽  
Ni Luh Sari Widhiyani

This study aims to determine the effect of time budget pressure (TBP) and professionalism on audit quality with auditor experience and job satisfaction as moderating in KAP in Bali. The population in this study were all auditors who worked in KAP in Bali, amounting to 77 auditors. Determination of samples in this study using non probability sampling method with purposive sampling technique. The sample amounted to 42 auditors. The results of this research questionnaire were measured using a Likert scale. The data analysis technique used is Moderated Regression Analysis. The results of this study indicate that time budget pressure has a negative and significant effect on audit quality; professionalism has a positive and significant effect on audit quality; auditor experience weakens the effect of time budget pressure on audit quality, and strengthens the influence of professionalism on audit quality; and job satisfaction weakens the effect of time budget pressure on audit quality, and strengthens the influence of professionalism on audit quality. Keywords: time budget pressure, professionalism, auditor experience, job satisfaction, audit quality


2011 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 249-272 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stuart D. Taylor

SUMMARY This paper investigates the implied assumption, made in many audit fee determination studies, that, within a given audit firm, all partners produce a statistically identical level of audit quality and earn a statistically identical level of audit fees. This is referred to as the “homogeneity assumption.” However, this is contradicted by the individual auditor behavioral literature, which shows that different individual auditor characteristics can have an impact on audit quality. Given the fact that audit partners differ in their quality, this paper hypothesizes that different audit partners will be able to earn differing levels of fees. This hypothesis is tested by estimating an audit fee model using data from 822 Australian publicly listed companies for the year 2005. Australia is an ideal audit market for this research, as the disclosure of the name of the audit engagement partner in the audit report is mandatory. The empirical results indicate that individual audit partners earn individual audit fee premiums (or discounts) that are not explainable by the audit firms of which they are members. Data Availability: All data have been extracted from publicly available sources.


2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 124-141
Author(s):  
Rahman Yakubu ◽  
Tracey Williams

Auditor independence and the quality of audit report is of growing concern to regulators, institutional investors and stakeholders as a series of accounting scandals have undermined the professionalism of auditors. The findings from this study produced an insight of how auditor’s independence improve audit quality and that abnormal audit fees is as a result of additional effort for auditor to carry out rigorous audit engagement as a result of wider audit scope; that mandatory audit firm rotation will enhance auditor independence, and that audit committee with nonexecutive independence will promote audit quality. The study also finds that in terms of auditor size, smaller audit firms that belong to professional bodies will provide higher audit quality. The main conclusion of this research is that where an auditor is fully independent in carrying out audit engagement with strong resistance to fees pressure will enhance audit quality. This research provides insight into the impact of IFRS adoption on audit fees.


2015 ◽  
Vol 91 (3) ◽  
pp. 767-792 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth L. Bills ◽  
Lauren M. Cunningham ◽  
Linda A. Myers

ABSTRACT In this study, we examine the benefits of membership in an accounting firm association, network, or alliance (collectively referred to as “an association”). Associations provide member accounting firms with numerous benefits, including access to the expertise of professionals from other independent member firms, joint conferences and technical trainings, assistance in dealing with staffing and geographic limitations, and the ability to use the association name in marketing materials. We expect these benefits to result in higher-quality audits and higher audit fees (or audit fee premiums). Using hand-collected data on association membership, we find that association member firms conduct higher-quality audits than nonmember firms, where audit quality is proxied for by fewer Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) inspection deficiencies and fewer financial statement misstatements, as well as less extreme absolute discretionary accruals and lower positive discretionary accruals. We also find that audit fees are higher for clients of member firms than for clients of nonmember firms, suggesting that clients are willing to pay an audit fee premium to engage association member audit firms. Finally, we find that member firm audits are of similar quality to a size-matched sample of Big 4 audits, but member firm clients pay lower fee premiums than do Big 4 clients. Our inferences are robust to the use of company size-matched control samples, audit firm size-matched control samples, propensity score matching, two-stage least squares regression, and to analyses that consider changes in association membership. Our findings should be of interest to regulators because they suggest that association membership assists small audit firms in overcoming barriers to auditing larger audit clients. In addition, our findings should be informative to audit committees when making auditor selection decisions, and to investors and accounting researchers interested in the relation between audit firm type and audit quality.


2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 624
Author(s):  
Ni Putu Ayu Nikita Sari Wulan ◽  
Ketut Budiartha

Audit quality is one important aspect, because quality audit will reflect the actual conditions on the field. This research is to give the empirical fact of the effect of professional skepticism, due professional care, and time budget pressure on quality audit. The research is taking place at the BPK RI Perwakilan Provinsi Bali. The quantity of the sample is 52 auditors, using of non probability sampling method with the sampling sapurated technique. Questioner technique from the survey method used to collects the datas. Analisys technique that used in this research is multiple linear regression analisys technique. The result of the research showed that the professional skepticism and due professional care significantly give positive effects to the quality audit, meanwhile time  budget pressure significantly give negative effects to the quality audit. Keywords: Professional Skepticism; Due Professional Care; Time Budget Pressure; Quality Audit.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document