scholarly journals The Role of Corporate Governance as Moderating Variable Between Capital Structure and Mining Company Performance

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 152-157
Author(s):  
Marselino Wau ◽  
Yohanes Dakhi ◽  
Kristiurman Jaya Mendrofa
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Capital Structure ◽  
Supervisory Board ◽  
Board Independence ◽  
Regression Result ◽  
Company Performance ◽  
Mining Company ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Relationship

The performance of a company has been becoming an interest of academics in the field of corporate finance since a decade ago. Mining companies are an important industry for the government as sources of funds to finance the country's development. However, studies on the relationship between capital structure and company performance which is moderated by corporate governance are very limited, especially in Indonesia's context. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the relationship between capital structure and company performance which is moderated by public ownership as a proxy of corporate governance. We apply the agency theory to underpin these relationships. We use the moderated regression analysis to accept or reject the hypothesis. However, the classical assumptions must be satisfied before proceeding to the regression analysis. The findings show that company performance which is measured by Stock return is about 42.99% on average. In addition, capital structure is about 39,73%, with Supervisory Board Independence of 38,11%. The mean value of company size is Rp 26.54 Triliun with company's age is 13.60 years old. The regression result shows that there is no effect of interaction between capital structure and corporate governance on company performance. These results have a practical and theoretical contribution. The phenomena of mining company performance can not be explained by signaling theory in the sense that capital composition could not convey the valuable information for investors and they, therefore, are not influenced by this information in investment decision making. Supervisory Board Independence could not play its role as a monitoring mechanism of Management Board.

scholarly journals Capital structure, corporate performance, and life cycle: Evidence from Indonesia

2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 449-461
Author(s):  
Eko Suyono ◽  
Subba Reddy Yarram ◽  
Riswan Riswan
Keyword(s):  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Life Cycle ◽  
Interest Rate ◽  
Capital Structure ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Company Performance ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Moderating Role

This study aims to investigate firstly, the influences of company life cycle (i.e., pioneer, growth, mature, and decline) and set of control variables (i.e, tax level, interest rate, institutional ownership, and managerial ownership) on capital structure; secondly, the influence of capital structure on company performance; and thirdly, the moderating role of each stage of the company life cycle on the relationship between capital structure and company performance. Implementing quantitative approach by using OLS Regression Analysis and Moderated Regression Analysis (MRA) on a set of the sample that consists of 157 Indonesian non-financial listed firms for 2010-2015 periods (942 firm years), findings show that company life cycle has a significant influence on capital structure. While for control variables, tax level and institutional ownership have a positive influence on the capital structure, wherein interest rate and managerial ownership have a negative effect on capital structure. Moreover, capital structure ratio influences positively on company performance. Finding also documents that pioneer and growth stages have a moderating role in strengthening the influence of capital structure on company performance, while mature and decline stages have a moderating role in weakening the influence of capital structure on company performance. This study provides important implications for corporations and business practitioners with regard to the best choice in the composition of capital structure which is able to improve company performance. On the best of our knowledge, it is the first study testing the moderating role of company life cycle on the relationship between capital structure and company performance.

scholarly journals PENGARUH STRUKTUR MODAL DAN STRUKTUR KEPEMILIKAN TERHADAP KINERJA PERUSAHAAN DENGAN CORPORATE GOVERNANCE SEBAGAI VARIABEL MODERASI

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 100
Author(s):  
Maretha Kris Dwi Anggreni ◽  
Robiyanto Robiyanto
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Capital Structure ◽  
Capital Market ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Analysis Tool ◽  
Company Performance ◽  
Optimal Point ◽  
Purposive Sampling

ABSTRACT This study aims to examine the effect of capital structure and ownership on company performance with moderation of corporate governance in trade, service and investment sector companies in 2016- 2019. The research data was obtained from the Indonesian Capital Market Directory (ICMD) and the annual financial reports listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The total sample obtained based on the purposive sampling method was 76 samples and tested using the Eviews 9 analysis tool. The analysis technique used panel data regression analysis and Moderated Regression Analysis (MRA). Capital structure and corporate governance as proxied by the role of independent commissioners are proven to improve company performance. The implication of this research is to provide empirical evidence regarding the role of corporate governance in moderating capital structure and ownership structure on company performance. The use of debt in the capital structure can have a positive influence on the company's performance. So the applied implication for the company is that it can increase debt in its capital structure by taking into account the optimal point. In addition, companies can optimize the role of independent commissioners as corporate governance to improve supervision within the company so as to improve company performance. ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan menguji pengaruh struktur modal dan kepemilikan terhadap kinerja perusahaan dengan moderasi corporate governance pada perusahaan sektor perdagangan, jasa dan investasi tahun 2016-2019. Data penelitian ini diperoleh dari Indonesian Capital Market Directory (ICMD) dan laporan keuangan tahunan yang tercatat pada Bursa Efek Indonesia. Total sampel diperoleh berdasarkan metode pengumpulan data purposive sampling adalah sebanyak 76 sampel dan diuji menggunakan alat analisis Eviews 9. Teknik analisis pada penelitian ini menggunakan analisis regresi data panel dan Moderated Regression Analysis (MRA). Variabel struktur modal serta variabel moderasi corporate governance yang diproksikan dengan peran komisaris independen terbukti dapat meningkatkan kinerja perusahaan. Implikasi dari penelitian ini adalah memberikan bukti secara empiris terkait peran corporate governance dalam memoderasi struktur modal dan struktur kepemilikan terhadap kinerja perusahaan. Penggunaan utang pada struktur modal mampu memberikan pengaruh positif terhadap kinerja perusahaan. Maka implikasi terapan bagi perusahaan yaitu dapat meningkatkan utang pada struktur modalnya dengan memperhatikan titik optimal. Selain itu, perusahaan dapat mengoptimalkan peran komisaris independen sebagai corporate governance untuk meningkatkan pengawasan dalam perusahaan sehingga meningkatkan kinerja perusahaan.JEL : G30, G32, G34

scholarly journals Corporate Governance, Capital Structure, Ownership Structure, And Corporate Value Of Companies Listed At The Nairobi Securities Exchange

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (15) ◽  
Author(s):  
David Onguka ◽  
Cyrus M. Iraya ◽  
Winnie L. Nyamute
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Capital Structure ◽  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Firm Value ◽  
Joint Effect ◽  
Moderating Effect ◽  
Series Data ◽  
Corporate Value ◽  
The Relationship

This paper focuses on establishing the relationship among corporate governance, capital structure, ownership structure, and firm value for companies listed at the Nairobi Security Exchange (NSE). The study tested three hypotheses that explored various aspects of this relationship: First, there is no intervening effect on the capital structure on the relationship between corporate governance and corporate value; Second, there is no significant moderating effect of ownership structure on the relationship between corporate governance and corporate value; and finally, there is no significant joint effect of corporate governance, capital structure, and ownership structure on corporate value. The data of the study was obtained from audited financial statements of the firms listed at the NSE. A census survey for sixty-four publicly trading firms at the NSE was undertaken. The data of 64 corporations was cleaned, leaving a smaller number of 58 firms which formed over 90% of the sample. The analysis covered a five-year period between 2013 to 2017. The study adopted a positivism philosophy and a descriptive design. Descriptive statistics and diagnostic tests were undertaken and thereafter inferential statistics, specifically correlation and regression analysis, were used for hypothesis testing. The multiple regression analysis was used to test the relationship among corporate governance, capital structure, ownership structure, and corporate value. The panel data procedure was considered more appropriate as the sample data contained both cross-sectional and time-series data. The Baron and Kenny’s (1986) approach was used to assess the intervening and moderating effect of capital structure and ownership structure respectively on the relationship between corporate governance and corporate value. Corporate Governance was measured by a composite of board independence, board size, board remuneration, and corporate gender diversity. Capital structure was measured by leverage, while ownership structure was measured by ownership concentration, state ownership, family ownership, and foreign ownership. Firm performance was measured using the Tobin Q. The joint effect of corporate governance, capital structure, and ownership structure on corporate value was found to be positive and significant. However, Ownership structure and capital structure had no significant moderating and intervening effects respectively on the relationship between corporate governance and corporate value. This study makes an original contribution as it takes a more holistic approach of corporate governance development by probing whether improving corporate governance is linked to the enhanced corporate value. The study recommends that corporate shareholders, boards, regulators, and management of listed corporations should put in place robust policies. This will ensure the implementation and monitoring of corporate governance principles and ensure congruence in their activities of the oversight of corporate objectives of optimizing corporate value and minimizing fraud and failure risks of corporations.

scholarly journals The level and stability of institutional ownership and its influence on company performance in South Africa

2015 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 1265-1277
Author(s):  
Henriette Elsabe Scholtz ◽  
Waldette Engelbrecht
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Firm Value ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Company Performance ◽  
Return On Assets ◽  
Business Interests ◽  
The Stability ◽  
The Relationship

Institutional ownership in companies is an important tool in monitoring and controlling the business interests of the shareholders. This study investigated whether the performance of the Top 100 companies listed on the Johannesburg Securities Exchange is influenced by the level, and stability of institutional ownership. A regression analysis was used to test the relationship between Tobin’s Q and return on assets and the international, domestic and total institutional ownership and the stability of institutional shareholding. It was found that institutional shareholding is an important corporate governance factor to improve firm value. International institutional shareholding has an effect on future firm value, whilst domestic institutional, total institutional shareholding and the stability of total institutional shareholding has an effect on historical firm value.

scholarly journals KINERJA PERUSAHAAN PENGARUH DARI STRUKTUR MODAL, PROFITABILITAS DAN UKURAN PERUSAHAAN

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-86
Author(s):  
Dede Hertina ◽  
Mohamad Bayu Herdiawan Hidayat ◽  
Fika Deningtyas
Keyword(s):  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Data Processing ◽  
Capital Structure ◽  
Hypothesis Testing ◽  
Coefficient Of Determination ◽  
Company Size ◽  
Company Performance ◽  
Verification Methods ◽  
Independent Variable ◽  
The Relationship

This study aims to determine the effect of Capital Structure, Profitability, Company Size on the Performance of the cigarette sub-sector companies listed on the IDX in 2014-2018. This research uses descriptive and verification methods with regression analysis tools and the coefficient of determination. The results of data processing analysis of the coefficient of determination obtained a fairly strong and unidirectional closeness of the relationship between the independent variable and the dependent variable and has a determination coefficient value of 47.91%. The results of testing the F test hypothesis indicate that the Capital Structure, Profitability and Company Size simultaneously have a significant effect on company Performance. Hypothesis testing using t test shows that Capital Structure has no significant effect on company Performance. Profitability has a significant effect on company Performance and Company Size has a significant effect on company Performance. Keywords: Capital Structure, Profitability, Company Size, Company Performance

IMPACT OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE ON FIRM PERFORMANCE: EVIDENCE FROM PAKISTAN

2021 ◽  
Vol 02 (01) ◽  
pp. 16-28
Author(s):  
Feryal Zafar ◽  
Shaheera Munir ◽  
Muhammad Saqib Khan
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Annual Reports ◽  
Board Independence ◽  
Negative Effects ◽  
Research Issues ◽  
Listed Firms ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
Dependent Variables ◽  
The Relationship

The study attempts to figure out the relationship between the performance of the firms and corporate governance in Pakistan. Governance mechanisms used in this study are CEO duality, Independence of Board, Size of Board, and Ownership Concentration. While, the ROA and ROE have been used as dependent variables to measure the performance of firms. Using regression analysis technique on 10 listed firms trading over four years from 2014-2017, the results have been derived. The data regarding all the variables have been collected from all the companies’ annual reports. The discoveries of the study direct that fundamentals of corporate governance such as the Size of the Board, Ownership, and Duality Concentration of CEO have negative effects on performance of organization, as measured by ROA and ROE. While Board independence positively affects the performance of firms. The results are thus significant and provide valuable information for the decision makers about the research issues under consideration.

scholarly journals Pengaruh Good Corporate Governance dan Budaya Tri Hita Karana Pada Kinerja Bank Perkreditan Rakyat

2017 ◽  
pp. 17
Author(s):  
I Gusti Ayu Made Asri Dwija Putri ◽  
I.G.K.A Ulupui ◽  
Ni Gusti Putu Wirawati
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Sampling Method ◽  
Research Result ◽  
Economic Problem ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Result Show ◽  
The Government ◽  
Cultural Effect

The purpose of this study, namely to obtain empirical evidence that the implementation of corporate governance affect the performance of “Bank Perkreditan Rakyat” ( rural banks), and the role of local culture “Tri Hita Karana “to the BPR’s performance. The population is all BPR located in Badung and Denpasar. The samples using purposive sampling method. The data in this study were collected using a questionnaire are distributed directly to the object of research. “BPR” number into the sample in this study was 65 Banks. Data analyzed by model Multiple Regression Analysis. The research result show that the principles of corporate governance and the local cultural effect on the performance of BPR in Badung and Denpasar. “Bank Perkreditan Rakyat”. The implication of the study is important for the government to solve the economic problem using Corporate Governance and Tri Hita Karana concept.  

Accounting conservatism, corporate governance and political connections

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 288-318 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nor Farizal Mohammed ◽  
Kamran Ahmed ◽  
Xu-Dong Ji
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Emerging Market ◽  
Political Influence ◽  
Ordinary Least Squares ◽  
Accounting Conservatism ◽  
Political Connections ◽  
Board Independence ◽  
Political Connection ◽  
Content Type ◽  
The Relationship

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the relationship between accounting conservatism, corporate governance and political connection in listed firms in Malaysia where political influence plays a significant role in the capital market and in many business dealings. Design/methodology/approach By utilizing 824 firm-year observations comprising large listed companies over a period of four years from 2004, this study uses ordinary least squares regression models to investigate the relationship between accounting conservatism, corporate governance and political connections in Malaysia. Multiple measures of conservatism developed by Basu (1997) and Khan and Watts (2009) are employed. Findings The results show evidence of accounting conservatism (bad news being recognized earlier than good news) in Malaysia. Further, the results reveal that better corporate governance structure in terms of board independence is positively associated with accounting conservatism while management ownership is negatively associated with it. However, political connection has a negative moderating effect on the positive relationship between accounting conservatism and board independence. The results also suggest political connections have a positive association with firm’s future performance. Originality/value This study is the first in investigating the effect of political connections on accounting conservatism in Malaysian context and how political connections negatively affect the monitoring role of the corporate boards. By directly measuring political connection and controlling for various corporate governance mechanisms and firm-specific attributes, this study contributes to enhance the authors’ understanding of the political influence in financial reporting quality and firm performance in an emerging market setting.

scholarly journals How Are Company Size, Financial Performance and Corporate Governance Related to Directors' Remuneration?

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 12
Author(s):  
Norziana Lokman ◽  
Fattiadriati Mohd Tareh
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Financial Performance ◽  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Pearson Correlation ◽  
Annual Reports ◽  
Company Size ◽  
Company Performance ◽  
Ceo Duality ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
A Company

This study examined the relationship between the company-specific characteristics, namely, company size, company performance, and company leverage and the corporate governance attributes of a company which includes CEO duality and remuneration committee independence as the predictor factors that determine directors’ remuneration. A sample of 260 public listed companies on Bursa Malaysia was selected using stratified random sampling for the financial reporting of 2018. All data concerning the company characteristics and corporate governance attributes were obtained from the annual reports of the companies, which can be accessed from the Bursa Malaysia website. Pearson correlation and multi-regression analysis were used to analyse the data to determine the relationship of the predictor variables with director remuneration. On the one hand, the results of the study showed that directors’ remuneration is positively and significantly related to the size of the company. On the other hand, the financial performance of a company is positively but weakly related to directors remuneration. The remaining predictors have no relationship with directors’ remuneration. The finding suggested that the key determinant factor of directors’ remuneration is company size whereas company performance may have a small impact. Lastly, company compliance with the recommendation of the Malaysian Code on Corporate Governance did not guarantee the effectiveness of the monitoring function of the remuneration committee in ensuring that directors’ remuneration is commensurate with company performance. The result of the study provides additional evidence and support that company size and financial performance are linked to director remuneration. Also the finding of the study reconfirmed prior study that board leadership structure (CEO duality) and remuneration committee independent have no impact on directors’ remuneration.

Corporate governance and dividends payout: are they substitutes or complementary?

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 177-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel Jebaraj Benjamin ◽  
Mazlina Mat Zain
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Agency Costs ◽  
Negative Relationship ◽  
Board Independence ◽  
Board Meeting ◽  
Dividend Payout ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Significant Negative Relationship ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Unique Relationship

Purpose – This paper aims to furnish incremental insights on dividends and corporate governance (CG) by addressing the relationship between board meeting frequency and board independence with dividend payout. In particular, this study aims to investigate whether CG attributes are substitutes to control agency problem within the Malaysian context. Design/methodology/approach – This paper examines panel data on a sample of 114 Malaysian firms (798 observations) for seven years from 2002 to 2008. Findings – Based on 798 firm-year observations for the period from 2002 to 2008, the results show significant negative relationship between CG (board independence, board meeting frequency) and dividend payout. This suggests that CG and dividend payout are substitutes in reducing agency costs. Our study provides empirical evidence consistent with the “substitution argument”, indicating that firms with weak CG need to establish reputation by paying more dividends. Specifically, the findings indicate that firms with a higher proportion of independent directors and boards of director that meet more frequent pay lower dividends. Originality/value – This paper provides evidence on previously untested governance characteristics in relation to how they act as substitute mechanisms with dividends for reducing agency costs. The results builds a strong case for the fresh strand of knowledge on dividends and CG which tests each CG variables to understand each of its unique relationship with dividends in line with the dividends outcome or substitute theory.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document