scholarly journals MORAL ASPECT REVIEW BY THEORY OF ROBERT M. ENTMAN IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF JOKO WIDODO HUGS MOMENTS WITH PRABOWO SUBIANTO IN THE ASIAN GAMES 2018 (News from Cnnindonesia.com Edition 29 - 30 August 2018)

ICCD ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 167-170
Author(s):  
Khanna Fajar Maulana ◽  
Jeanie Annissa
Keyword(s):  
Secondary Data ◽  
Research Literature ◽  
Treatment Recommendation ◽  
Online Media ◽  
Framing Analysis ◽  
Moral Issues ◽  
Moral Decisions ◽  
Moral Aspect ◽  
Data Collection Technique ◽  
The Moment

This research discuss about construction carried out by online media cnnindonesia.com to moment hug Joko Widodo with Prabowo Subianto in organizing the 2018 Asian Games in the pencak silat sport. This research aims to understand moral aspect review by theory of Robert M. Entman in the construction of Joko Widodo hugs moments with Prabowo Subianto in the Asian Games 2018 (news from Cnnindonesia.com edition 29 – 30 August 2018). The theory used is Robert M. Entman framing analysis, which is defining problems, estimating problems or sources of problems, making moral decisions and emphasizing solutions. The method used is a descriptive qualitative approach. The data collection technique uses secondary data which emphasizes research literature. The results of this research explain that cnnindonesia.com shows the issue and constructs the news of  the moment to moral issues, Define Problems moral issues, namely the embrace of Jokowidodo and PrabowoSubianto together with Hanifan Yudani Kusumah martial arts athlete. Diagnosis Causes of hug moments can be an example for people to respect each other. Make Moral Judgment Hanifan Yudani Kusumah kissed the hands of Joko Widodo and Prabowo Subianto and embraced the two so they embraced tightly and asked their people to respect and respect each other. Treatment Recommendation hopes that the political contestation that takes place by the community can maintain mutual unity, togetherness and brotherhood.

scholarly journals PRESS DISPUTE RESOLUTION: METODOLOGI RESOLUSI KONFLIK BERBASIS MEDIA

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-90
Author(s):  
Kurnia Sari Wiwaha ◽  
Ustadi Hamsah
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Online News ◽  
Moral Judgement ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Treatment Recommendation ◽  
Online Media ◽  
Framing Analysis ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
The Media

Islam has been known as a religion of Rahmatn lil’alamiin which guarantees inclusion and maintains a treatise on all humanity. However, the interpretation of universality of Islam does not meet a common understanding even though within Muslim community itself. Those diverse interpretations have resulted in how the universality of Islam has been expressed. One of those quarrels toward interpretation is the discussion of Islam Nusantara. West Sumatera is one of the regions in Indonesia which implements Islamic law as its customary law in which rejection against Islam Nusantara has been echoed across the borders. The rejection caused reactions from various parties since West Sumatera strongly stated the rejection as a way for preserving it. Those dispute has been sharpened by the online news in several Indonesian media that began to raise the phenomenon up. This research aim to find out how those medias frame the news and whether online media contribute on minimizing public tensions. This research used descriptive method with qualitative approach. The source of the data focused on Indonesian online media news on 2018 and was analyzed with framing analysis from Robert N. Entman and also using the concept of treatment recommendation as an analyzes of dispute resolution. The results discovered that media with its framing analysis technique has their own moral judgement and treatment recommendation as a form of dispute resolution towards discourses in the media. This moral judgment can show the tendency and alignment of a media regarding an issue. In addition, the media also has an important role in developing the audience’s mindset in the midst of dispute it can be analyzed from the treatment recommendation that can be used as a media based dispute resolution.   Islam merupakan agama rahmatan lil ‘alamiin dan bersifat universal serta hadir sebagai sebuah risalah seluruh umat manusia. Akan tetapi, pemaknaan terhadap universalitas Islam tidak seragam terlebih pemaknaannya bagi kalangan umat Islam itu sendiri. Hal ini menimbulkan banyak interpetasi yang bermacam-macam untuk mengekspresikan universalitas Islam ini. Salah satu bentuk interpretasi ini adalah munculnya istilah Islam Nusantara yang kembali menuai perdebatan. Sumatera Barat merupakan salah satu wilayah di Indonesia dengan hukum Islam dan adatnya yang sangat kuat menolak pengistilahan ini. Penolakan ini menimbulkan banyak reaksi dari beberbagai pihak. Hal ini dikarenakan, Sumatera Barat yang sangat menjaga kelestarian budayanya menolak wacana ini yang memiliki visi samaseperti yang dimiliki Sumatera Barat. Arena pertarungan ini diperluas oleh adanya pemberitaan di media-media online Indonesia yang mulai mengangkat fenomena ini. Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk menemukan bagaimana media membingkai pemberitaan dan apakah media juga memiliki peran untuk meminimalisasi ketegangan yang terjadi antara pihak yang bertikai. Metode yang digunakan adalah metode deskriptif dengan pendekatan kualitatif. Sumber data yang diperoleh mengacu pada pemberitaan media online mainstream Indonesia pada tahun 2018 dan dianalisis dengan menggunakan teknik analisis framing media model Robert N. Entman dan treatment recommendation sebagai bentuk dispute resolution wacana di media. Hasil dari penelitan ini mengungkapkan bahwa dalam pembingkaian sebuah berita, media memiliki moral judgement-nya masing-masing. Moral Judgement ini yang dapat memperlihatkan arah atau keberpihakan suatu media terhadap suatu isu. Selain itu, media juga memiliki peranan penting dalam mendewasakan khalayak di tengah konflik. Hal ini terlihat dari adanya treatment recommendation yang dapat digunakan sebagai dispute resolution berbasis media.

ANALISIS FRAMING PEMBERITAAN POLITIK DINASTI JOKOWI PADA PEMILIHAN KEPALA DAERAH SERENTAK TAHUN 2020 DI MEDIA ONLINE

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 131
Author(s):  
Abdul Aziz ◽  
Umaimah Wahid
Keyword(s):  
Problem Definition ◽  
Online Media ◽  
Analysis Model ◽  
Framing Analysis ◽  
Moral Decision Making ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Public Attention ◽  
The Family ◽  
Dynastic Politics ◽  
Data Collection Technique

Dynastic politics has always been an issue that has attracted public attention to be discussed during the Regional Head Election (Pilkada) process. This is because in reality there is a tendency in many regional heads to try to build dynastic politics. The simultaneous Regional Head Election (Pilkada) in 2020 is quite interesting with several candidates emerging from the family of President Jokowi. This study aims to determine how online media of kompas.com and okezone.com in framing news about dynastic politics in the 2020 Pilkada. To achieve this goal, this study uses a qualitative research method, where the author uses the framing analysis model of Robert N. Entmant. The object of this research is news regarding the politics of President Jokowi's dynasty, in online media kompas.com and okezone.com. The data collection technique used literature study. The results of the analysis of this study present news about dynastic politics in the 2020 Pilkada. In the results of the news framing analysis using the Robert N. Entman model, there are several stages such as problem definition, problem estimation from problem sources, moral decision making, and problem solving. The news on kompas.com clearly highlighted news that was contra or disagreeable with the existence of dynastic politics in Indonesia, especially in the 2020 Pilkada, while the news on okezone.com clearly did not question the existence of dynastic politics in the 2020 Pilkada. The victory of the two PDI-Perjuangan candidates is part of the General Chair's commitment to ensure that his party leads to produce quality young leadership. Of course, the imbalance in the selection of sources in the news is very important so that people who see it can provide a more objective opinion of the news.

scholarly journals Media and environment: how indonesia online news portal frames biodegradable issue?

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 167
Author(s):  
Monika Sri Yuliarti ◽  
Wikan Jatimurti
Keyword(s):  
Media Coverage ◽  
Environmental Issues ◽  
Online News ◽  
Treatment Recommendation ◽  
Online Media ◽  
Environmental Damage ◽  
Biodegradable Material ◽  
Analysis Model ◽  
Framing Analysis ◽  
Online News Sites

Environmental problems are still an important issue and cannot be resolved completely until now, even after the 1970s the United Nations established a world environmental day. Plastic waste is considered the most responsible for the problems of environmental damage today. Therefore, an innovation that comes from biodegradable material, with its biodegradable product is considered to be the answer to this environmental problem. This study examines how reporting on the environment is framed in online mass media, especially in relation to biodegradable material and biodegradable products. This is qualitative research, with the object of two Indonesian online news sites, namely www.detik.com and www.okezone.com. Data collection techniques used is document studies and data analysis techniques employed is Robert N. Entman's Framing analysis model which involves four elements, namely: define problems, diagnose causes, make moral judgment, and treatment recommendation. The findings of this study are that environmental issues have not dominated online media coverage, and the biodegradable issue has not been framed thoroughly by online media.

scholarly journals Polemik Majelis Ulama Indonesia tentang Konsep Islam Nusantara: Sebuah Analisis Framing Media Online

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-36
Author(s):  
Zanniro Sururi Hsb
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Methods ◽  
Moral Judgment ◽  
Media Framing ◽  
Treatment Recommendations ◽  
Moral Judgement ◽  
Treatment Recommendation ◽  
Online Media ◽  
Framing Analysis ◽  
The Public ◽  
News Reports

This study explores the Indonesian Ulema Council’s polemic coverage about the concept of Islam Nusantara through online media framing analysis. To look at online media framing, I use qualitative methods with Robert N. Etnman’s framing study that examines two things: selecting issues and the emphasis or promotion of certain aspects. The analysis contained four concepts: defining problems, diagnosing causes, making a moral judgment, and treatment recommendations. The results showed that three online media gave rise to a variety of news reports. Detiknews.com brings up news about scholars’ polemic in the Indonesian Ulema Council area behind Islam Nusantara’s concept eight times, CNNIndonesia.com five times, and Kompas.com three times. Interpretations of the three online media have different attitudes. Detiknews.com in framing can not be said to be neutral, but there has been a bit of a splash of neutrality by displaying statements as a bit of a counterparty, although dominated by pre-party views. CNNIndonesia.com is more impressed to provoke the public to respond to the construction of reality in framing because many use the election diction provocative title. Kompas.com is more neutral compared to Detiknews.com and CNNIndonesia.com. Kompas media tends to use the principle of cover both sides, and the news is more in the form of articles or public opinion.Studi ini mencoba untuk mengeksplorasi pemberitaan polemik Majelis Ulama Indonesia tentang konsep Islam Nusantara melalui analisis framing media online. Untuk melihat framing media online, penulis menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan analisis framing Robert N. Etnman yang mengkaji dua hal, yaitu seleksi isu dan penekanan atau penonjolan aspek-aspek tertentu. Analisis tersebut terdapat empat konsep, yaitu define problems (pendefenisian masalah), diagnose causes (memperkirakan penyebab masalah), make moral judgement (membuat pilihan moral), dan treatment recommendation (menekankan penyelesaian). Hasil studi menunjukkan bahwa tiga media online memunculkan vitur berita yang beragam. Detiknews.com memunculkan berita tentang polemik ulama di kawasan MUI dibalik konsep “Islam Nusantara sebanyak 8 kali”, CNNIndonesia.com sebanyak 5 kali, dan Kompas.com sebanyak 3 kali. Interpretasi dari ketiga media online tersebut memiliki sikap berbeda-beda. Detiknews.com dalam melakukan framing belum bisa dikatakan netral, akan tetapi sudah ada sedikit percikan kenetralan dengan menampilkan pernyataan sekelumit pihak kontra walaupun didominasi pernyataan pihak yang pro. CNNIndonesia.com lebih terkesan memprovokasi masyarakat untuk menanggapi konstruksi realitas yang di framing karena banyak menggunakan pemilihan diksi judul yang provokatif. Kompas.com lebih netral dibandingkan dengan Detiknews.com dan CNNIndonesia.com. Media Kompas cenderung menggunakan prinsip cover both side dan pemberitaannya lebih banyak berbentuk artikel ataupun opini masyarakat.

scholarly journals Komparasi Bingkai Peristiwa Bencana di Media Online Indonesia

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-78
Author(s):  
Zamhari Zamhari
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Treatment Recommendation ◽  
Online Media ◽  
Framing Analysis ◽  
Moral Statement

This paper examines the differences between Tirto.id and Republika.co.id in framing reporting on the causes of the crash of the Lion Air JT-610 plane on October 29, 2018. This research is a qualitative study using Robert M. Entman's four-stage framing analysis, namely define problems, define causes, make moral statement, and treatment recommendation. The results of this study indicate that there are differences in framing between the three online media in reporting a disaster. Tirto.id focuses more on the professionalism of Lion Air's management, while Republika.co.id focuses more on the news about the cause of the crash of the Lion Air JT-610 plane because the Lion Air JT-610 aircraft is the latest release. This proves that every newsroom has a certain standard in applying the principles of disaster journalism. Tulisan ini mengulas perbedaan Tirto.id dan Republika.co.id dalam membingkai pemberitaan penyebab jatuhnya pesawat Lion Air JT-610 pada tanggal 29 Oktober 2018. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kualitatif dengan menggunakan analisis framing empat tahap Robert M. Entman, yaitu define problems, define causes, make moral statement, dan treatment recommendation. Hasil penelitian ini menyatakan bahwa terdapat perbedaan framing di antara ketiga media online tersebut dalam memberitakan sebuah bencana. Tirto.id lebih menyoroti profesionalisme manajemen Lion Air, sedangkan Republika.co.id lebih mem-framing pemberitaan penyebab jatuhnya pesawat Lion Air JT-610 lantaran jenis pesawat Lion Air JT-610 merupakan keluaran terbaru. Hal ini membuktikan bahwa setiap newsroom memiliki standar tertentu dalam menerapkan prinsip jurnalisme bencana.

scholarly journals Biasing moral decisions by exploiting the dynamics of eye gaze

2015 ◽  
Vol 112 (13) ◽  
pp. 4170-4175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip Pärnamets ◽  
Petter Johansson ◽  
Lars Hall ◽  
Christian Balkenius ◽  
Michael J. Spivey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Processing ◽  
Causal Effect ◽  
Eye Gaze ◽  
Linguistic Processing ◽  
Moral Issues ◽  
Moral Decisions ◽  
Sensorimotor Systems ◽  
Forced Choice Task ◽  
The Moment ◽  
High Level

Eye gaze is a window onto cognitive processing in tasks such as spatial memory, linguistic processing, and decision making. We present evidence that information derived from eye gaze can be used to change the course of individuals’ decisions, even when they are reasoning about high-level, moral issues. Previous studies have shown that when an experimenter actively controls what an individual sees the experimenter can affect simple decisions with alternatives of almost equal valence. Here we show that if an experimenter passively knows when individuals move their eyes the experimenter can change complex moral decisions. This causal effect is achieved by simply adjusting the timing of the decisions. We monitored participants’ eye movements during a two-alternative forced-choice task with moral questions. One option was randomly predetermined as a target. At the moment participants had fixated the target option for a set amount of time we terminated their deliberation and prompted them to choose between the two alternatives. Although participants were unaware of this gaze-contingent manipulation, their choices were systematically biased toward the target option. We conclude that even abstract moral cognition is partly constituted by interactions with the immediate environment and is likely supported by gaze-dependent decision processes. By tracking the interplay between individuals, their sensorimotor systems, and the environment, we can influence the outcome of a decision without directly manipulating the content of the information available to them.

scholarly journals Polemik “Buta” dan “Budek” dalam Pidato K.H. Ma’ruf Amin: Analisis Framing Robert N. Enmant pada Media Online

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 111-124
Author(s):  
Sutan Kumala Pontas Nasution
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
People With Disabilities ◽  
Vice President ◽  
Moral Judgement ◽  
Treatment Recommendation ◽  
Online Media ◽  
Framing Analysis ◽  
The Republic

The background of the problem in this research is how three online media, CNNIndonesia.com, Republika.co.id, and Tempo.co, framed speeches containing the words “blind” and “deaf” delivered by the candidates for Vice President of the Republic of Indonesia. K.H. Ma’ruf Amin on Saturday, November 10 2018 in the presence of Barisan Nusantara (BarNus) volunteers. The three media were chosen based on the argumentation about the diversity of ideologies they held. This research method uses framing analysis proposed by Robert N. Entman. The data obtained were analyzed in four stages, that is define problems, diagnose causes, make moral judgement, and treatment recommendation. The results show that CNNIndonesia.com focuses more on the responses that arise from the community, especially people with disabilities; while Republika.co.id stated that the meaning of Ma’ruf Amin’s words did not refer to people with disabilities; and Tempo.co tended to be impartial by presenting neutral news.Latar belakang masalah pada penelitian ini adalah bagaimana tiga media online, CNNIndonesia.com, Republika.co.id, dan Tempo.co, membingkai pidato yang berisi kata-kata “buta” dan “budek” yang disampaikan oleh calon Wakil Presiden Republik Indonesia, K.H. Ma’ruf Amin pada hari Sabtu 10 November 2018 di hadapan relawan Barisan Nusantara (BarNus). Ketiga media tersebut dipilih dengan argumentasi keragaman ideologi yang dianut pemiliknya. Metode penelitian ini menggunakan analisis framing yang dikemukakan oleh Robert N. Entman. Data yang diperoleh dianalisis ke dalam empat tahap, yakni pendefinisian masalah, memperkirakan sumber masalah, membuat keputusan moral, dan menekankan penyelesaian. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa CNNIndonesia.com lebih menyoroti respon yang timbul dari masyarakat khususnya kaum disabilitas; sedangkan Republika.co.id menyebut bahwa maksud dari perkataan Ma’ruf Amin tidak menjurus kepada kaum disabilitas; dan adapun Tempo.co cenderung tidak berpihak dengan menyajikan berita yang netral.

scholarly journals KONSTRUKSI REALITAS KONFLIK INDUSTRI PENERBANGAN Framing Pemberitaan Konflik Traveloka Vs AirAsia di Detik.com

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-63
Author(s):  
Euis Komalawati
Keyword(s):  
Distribution Channel ◽  
Treatment Recommendation ◽  
Aviation Industry ◽  
Online Media ◽  
Framing Analysis ◽  
Public Attention ◽  
Transportation Services ◽  
The Public ◽  
Online Travel ◽  
Business To Business

Entering into 2019, the public users of air transportation services were shocked by various reports on issues related to the aviation industry, from rising avtur prices, high domestic flight tickets, the elimination of free baggage services to competition and penetration of foreign airlines. One of the news in online media that attracted public attention was the conflict between AirAsia and Traveloka as an online travel agent (OTA). For this reason, this study was carried out to analyze the conflict reporting framing of Traveloka vs AirAsia in Detik.com online media. This study used a qualitative method with Robert N. Entman's framing analysis approach. The unit of analysis in this study was 5 news texts about the conflict of Traveloka vs AirAsia on Detik.com media. The results of the study refer to the four elements of framing Entman. The first, defining the problem that the loss of AirAsia ticket distribution at Traveloka is due to problems with business to business and the alleged pressure of national airlines. The second, source of problems (Diagnose Causes) is Traveloka due to the pressure of the national airline. The third, the moral decision (Make Moral Judgment) of this problem cannot be allowed to drag on because it is a form of discrimination. The fourth, emphasizing the settlement (Treatment Recommendation), namely the need for dialogue between the two parties mediated by the Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU). The framing highlighted by Detik.com in the Traveloka vs AirAsia Conflict report was a bbusiness-to-business problem, even though there was an allegation that there had been an indication of an AirAsia ticket distribution channel due to the pressure of the national airlanes

scholarly journals Bingkai “Tampang Boyolali “ dalam Pidato Prabowo Subianto di Media Daring

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-92
Author(s):  
Mike Meiranti
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Research ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Media Framing ◽  
Moral Judgement ◽  
Treatment Recommendation ◽  
Online Media ◽  
Framing Analysis ◽  
Government Officials ◽  
Qualitative Research Method ◽  
The People

This article aims to explain and describe "tampang Boyolali" in Prabowo's speech which was explored using online media framing analysis. To see the framing of media online the authorused qualitative research method with framing analysis Robert N Entman who examined the analysis into four concepts namely: define problems, diagnose causes, make moral judgement, and treatment recommendation. The results of the study using three online media gave rise to fitur diverse news. The diction "Tampang Boyolali" in Prabowo Subianto's speech invited controversy in the community and media. Government officials also contributed to the diction of his speech. The diction "Tampang Boyolali" seemed to demean the people of Boyolali, and immediately invited an angry reaction from the people of Boyolali. Researchers collected data in the form of images and text through 3 media, namely CNNIndonesia.com, Sindonews.com, and Kompas.Com. The three media are actively preaching "Tampang Boyolali" with different framing. In this case the author tried to analyze the news with Robert N. Entmen's analysis which resulted in the fact that CNNIndonesia.com did not respond well and discredited Prabowo's apology. Meanwhile Sindonew.com appreciated Prabowo's  gentleman attitude that dared to make an apology. As Kompas.com tend to be neutral, do not appreciate and do not discredit the figures reported.Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan dan mendeskripsikan “tampang Boyolali” dalam pidato Prabowo yang dieksplorasi menggunakan analisis framing media online. Untuk melihat framing media online penulis menggunakan metode penelitian kualitatif dengan analisis framing Robert N Entman yang mengkaji analisis menjadi empat konsep yaitu: define problems (pendefenisian masalah), diagnose causes (memperkirakan penyebab masalah), make moral judgement (membuat pilihan moral), dan treatment recommendation (menekankan penyelesaian). Hasil studi menggunakan tiga media online memunculkan fitur berita yang beragam. Diksi “Tampang Boyolali" dalam pidato Prabowo Subianto mengundang kontroversi di masyarakat dan media. Para petinggi pemerintahan pun turut andil mengomentari diksi pidatonya tersebut. Diksi “Tampang Boyolali" seakan merendahkan warga Boyolali, dan seketika mengundang reaksi marah warga Boyolali. Peneliti mengumpulkan data berupa gambar dan teks melalui 3 media, yaitu CNNIndonesia.com, Sindonews.com, dan Kompas.Com. Ketiga media tersebut aktif memberitakan “Tampang Boyolali” dengan framing yang berbeda-beda. Dalam hal ini penulis mencoba menganalisis berita dengan analisis Robert N. Entmen yang menghasilkan fakta bahwa CNNIndonesia.com tidak merespon baik dan mendiskreditkan permohonan maaf Prabowo. Sedangkan Sindonew.com sangat mengapresiasi sikap gentleman Prabowo yang berani menghaturkan permohonan maaf. Adapun Kompas.com cenderung netral, tidak mengapresiasi dan tidak mendiskreditkan tokoh yang diberitakan.

scholarly journals RELIGIOUS RADICALISM FRAME IN THE ONLINE MEDIA NEWS (Framing Analysis Reporting Of “ISIS” In Republika.co.id and Tempo.co)

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 80
Author(s):  
Mohammad Zamroni ◽  
Yanti Dwi Astuti ◽  
Achmad Zuhri
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Literal Meaning ◽  
Online Media ◽  
Framing Analysis ◽  
Quality Of Reporting ◽  
Unit Of Analysis ◽  
Library Studies ◽  
Discourse Strategy

This study aims to explore how the framing of Islamic radicalism through the reporting of the group "ISIS" in two online media, namely in Republika.com and Tempo.co with an impartiality perspective. The research method used is descriptive qualitative by using a discourse strategy that sees the text and its context as information that contributes to communicating the contents of the message. Primary and secondary data are obtained from news curators, online portals, and library studies. While the unit of analysis is ISIS radicalism news in Republika.co.id and Tempo.co in the period of August to December 2014 that falls within the three criteria of radicalism news, namely acts of violence, beliefs championed, old-fashioned views or rigid thoughts that underlie acts of violence using techniques framing analysis of Gamson and Modigliani models. The results showed that news about radical "ISIS" included in the category of news construction that was emotional, sadistic, provocative and without confirmation. In addition, the quality of reporting often adorns with words that appear hyperbole and bombastic, the coverage is less profound and changes in a matter of minutes. The trend of Tempo.co and Republika.co.id dramatizes and exaggerates what happens in conflict areas by using connoted language rather than language that has a literal meaning. Then it has not fulfilled the principle of impartiality of news which can be seen from the neutrality and balance of news that determines the quality of reporting.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document