scholarly journals ANALISIS PENGARUH KINERJA KEUANGAN TERHADAP TNGKAT KESEHATAN BANK SYARIAH DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE RGEC PERIODE 2012 - 2016

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 13
Author(s):  
Amalia Paramita Sari
Keyword(s):  
Health Assessment ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Financial Statements ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Bank Performance ◽  
Self Assessment ◽  
Descriptive Research ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Independent Variable ◽  
Bank Soundness

This study aims to determine how the soundness of the Sharia Bank in the period 2012 - 2016. This type of research is descriptive research with quantitative approach. The variables used were risk profile as measured by the ratio of NPF and FDR, good corporate governance is measured through self-assessment results, profitability as measured by ROA and NIM, and Capital as measured by the ratio of CAR. The data used in this study is secondary data in the form of financial statements of 2012-2016 that have been audited by independent auditors and has been published. This study uses four samples, Bank Muamalat, Bank BRI Syariah, Bank Syariah Mandiri, and Bank BNI Syariah. The results showed that: (1) Variables The magnitude of the effect of NPF, FDR, GCG, ROA, NIM and CAR on bank soundness can be concluded that there are significant influence simultaneously. Independent variable able to explain dependent variable equal to 64%. (2) The variable that has significant partial effect on bank soundness is GCG variable. While the variable of NPF, FDR, ROA, NIM and CAR give insignificant influence to bank soundness. (3) Predicates of bank performance during the period 2012-2016 using RGEC method known to exist 92% of banks indicate that the condition of the bank is stable. This means that commercial banks can be categorized as " soundness" bank.Keywords: Accounting, Health Assessment, Sharia Bank. risk profile, GCG

Analisis Kinerja Keuangan Bank Aceh Setelah Konversi Periode 2016-2018 Berdasarkan Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 8/POJK.03/2014

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 43
Author(s):  
Hanifa Assofia
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Financial Performance ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Financial Statements ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Bank Capital ◽  
Collection Method ◽  
Descriptive Research ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Quantitative Descriptive

<p>This research aims to find out how Bank Aceh's financial performance after conversion in terms of earnings and capital. The type of research used is quantitative descriptive research. The data collection method used is the documentation method based on the data in the form of quarterly financial statements for the 2016-2018 period published. The method of data analysis in this study is by using the RGEC method (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earning and Capital). The results of the study show that Bank Aceh's financial performance in terms of profitability ranks 2, with the definition that profitability is adequate, profit exceeds the target and supports the growth of bank capital. Bank Aceh's decision to convert to sharia as a whole was a very appropriate decision because it was able to show good performance, besides that it also supported the Aceh Government in carrying out its programs to enforce Islamic law. Bank Aceh's financial performance in terms of capital also ranks 2, with the definition that banks have adequate capital quality and adequacy relative to their risk profile, which is accompanied by strong capital management in accordance with the characteristics, scale of business and the complexity of the bank's business.</p>

scholarly journals Penilaian Tingkat Kesehatan Bank: Pendekatan CAMEL Dan RGEC

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Erika Amelia ◽  
Astiti Chandra Aprilianti
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Asset Management ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Sound Level ◽  
Capital Asset ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Almost All ◽  
Bank Soundness

This study aims to determine the risk based bank rating at PT. Bank Maybank SyariahIndonesia if measured using CAMEL (Capital, Asset, Management, Earning,Liquidity) method and RGEC (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earning,Capital) in 2011-2016 and also aims to know differences in ratios used in CAMELSand RGEC methods. The research method used in this research is literature researchor study desk study. The data used in this research is secondary data using financialstatements of Bank Maybank Syariah Indonesia Period 2011-2016. The results showthat the bank can be said to be adequately sound because almost all the ratios usedmeet the specified requirements and there are still some ratios that have not met therequirements, but in both methods have different results. In the year 2011-2014 therisk based bank rating of Maybank Syariah Bank is calculated using CAMEL methodof bank is in the sound level. In 2015 -2016, the calculation of bank soundness showsthat bank condition is in an sound level. In Maybank Syariah Bank the state of thebank is in the sound level is in 2011-2013 if calculated using the RGEC method. Inthe year 2014-2016 the condition of the bank shows a adequately sound level.

scholarly journals ANALISIS TINGKAT KESEHATAN BANK DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN PENDEKATAN RGEC (RISK PROFILE, GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, EARNINGS, CAPITAL)? Studi pada PT BPR SINAR KUTA Periode 2016-2018

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (01) ◽  
Author(s):  
I Komang Gede ◽  
Tri Ratnawati
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Liquidity Risk ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Bank Performance ◽  
Good Management ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Bank Soundness

The results of this study indicate that based on the analysis of the BPR Sinar Kuta NPL formula in 2018 increased every year 2016 = 2.55%, 2017 = 3.12%, and 2018 =3.75%. and Liquidity risk using two ratios, namely LDR and LAR, has increased anddecreased. This shows that BPR Sinar Kuta has good profitability towards third partyrefunds. GCG Bank Sinar Kuta also has very good management as evidenced from 2016 -2018 showing a good composite predicate by determining a healthy bank valuation matrixbased on Bank Indonesia Regulation No.13 and the predicate is that all the compositevalues are still in greater or equal rules with (?) 1.5. When viewed from CAR, BankSinar Kuta is ranked 5th, it shows that Bank Sinar as a BPR Bank has a reasonable levelof health. Keywords: Factor Analysis, Bank Soundness, Bank Performance, RGEC

scholarly journals Penilaian Kesehatan Bank (Studi Pada PT. Bank Muamalat Indonesia, Tbk. Tahun 2016- 2019)

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Citra Puspa Permata
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Annual Report ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Descriptive Study ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Financial Health ◽  
Self Assessment ◽  
Financial Condition ◽  
Financial Conditions ◽  
Good Corporate Governance

This study aims to determine the financial health of PT. Bank Muamalat Indonesia, Tbk from four aspects in RGEC which is Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, and Capital. This research is a descriptive study with a quantitative approach. The main data of this study comes from the Annual Report of PT. Bank Muamalat Indonesia, Tbk. from 2016 to 2019, the so-called secondary data were analyzed using the RGEC method. The results showed that in the period 2016-2019, the risk profile aspect of PT. Bank Muamalat Indonesia with the NPF and  FDR Indicator on average is in a healthy financial condition, but the CR indicator showed unhealthy financial conditions. The GCG aspect using self-assessment showed a fairly healthy financial condition, the earnings aspect. with NOM, ROA and average ROE showed unhealthy financial conditions, as well as the capital aspect with average CAR and PR ratios is in very healthy financial conditions.

scholarly journals Analisis Kinerja Keuangan Bank Aceh Setelah Konversi Periode 2016-2018 Berdasarkan Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 8/POJK.03/2014

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 43
Author(s):  
Hanifa Assofia
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Financial Performance ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Financial Statements ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Bank Capital ◽  
Collection Method ◽  
Descriptive Research ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Quantitative Descriptive

<p>This research aims to find out how Bank Aceh's financial performance after conversion in terms of earnings and capital. The type of research used is quantitative descriptive research. The data collection method used is the documentation method based on the data in the form of quarterly financial statements for the 2016-2018 period published. The method of data analysis in this study is by using the RGEC method (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earning and Capital). The results of the study show that Bank Aceh's financial performance in terms of profitability ranks 2, with the definition that profitability is adequate, profit exceeds the target and supports the growth of bank capital. Bank Aceh's decision to convert to sharia as a whole was a very appropriate decision because it was able to show good performance, besides that it also supported the Aceh Government in carrying out its programs to enforce Islamic law. Bank Aceh's financial performance in terms of capital also ranks 2, with the definition that banks have adequate capital quality and adequacy relative to their risk profile, which is accompanied by strong capital management in accordance with the characteristics, scale of business and the complexity of the bank's business.</p>

scholarly journals Analisis Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Dengan Menggunakan Metode Rgec Pada PT. Bank Tabungan Negara, Tbk. Periode 2015-2017

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 7
Author(s):  
Fina Priskila Kawengian ◽  
Frendy A. O. Pelleng ◽  
Wilfried S. Manoppo
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Financial Statement ◽  
Descriptive Research ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
A Value ◽  
Data Source ◽  
Composite Rating ◽  
Quantitative Descriptive

This study aimed to analyze the health of a bank, at PT. Bank Tabungan Negara, Tbk. by using the Rgec method. The Rgec method consists of several components, namely Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, Capital. of these components also have indicators. which will later rank a bank which is ranked in what category, based on calculations through the company's financial statement data. This research uses quantitative descriptive research. The data source used is secondary data with documentation data collection techniques. Based on the results of data analysis, it was concluded that during the 2015-2017 period, (1) Bank BTN risk profile was in a healthy condition with NPL of 1,60%, 1,40% and 1,30% respectively, and LDR of 109,54%, 103,63%, and 104,19%. (2) GCG for the period 2015-2017 is 2 with healthy criteria. (3) Earnings in the 2015-2017 period are in a healthy condition with ROA of 1,47%, 1,55%, and 1,47%, NIM of 3,96%, 3,81%, and 3,57% , BOPO was 78,67%, 77,96% and 77,12%. (4) Capital is in a very healthy condition with a CAR value of 16,96%, 20,33% and 18,86%. (5) Rgec as a whole is in Composite Rating 1 which is very healthy with a value of 85,71%.

scholarly journals Penilaian Kesehatan Bank Perkreditan Rakyat Syariah (BPRS) ABC

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-26
Author(s):  
Arfan Anugrah Asyhari ◽  
Rangga Putra Ananto ◽  
Eka Rosalina
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Credit Risk ◽  
Financial Services ◽  
Liquidity Risk ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Qualitative Approach ◽  
Bank Risk ◽  
Descriptive Research ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Bank Soundness

This study aims to determine the Bank Soundness Level with the object of Islamic Rural Banks registered with the Financial Services Authority in 2015-2019. The type of the research that used in this research is descriptive research with a qualitative approach. Assessment using the Risk-Based Bank Rating (RBBR) method consists of four factors, namely the Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings and Capital of each bank. The Risk Profile consists of credit risk and liquidity risk. Credit risk is measured using NPF and liquidity risk is measured using FDR. Earnings factor is measured by ROA and NIM ratio, Capital factor is calculated by CAR ratio. The results showed that the results obtained the predicate of being unhealthy and even quite healthy on the NPF, FDR, ROA, and NIM ratios, while the CAR ratios for the last 3 years received the predicate Very Healthy appropriate to Bank Indonesia regulations, which exceeded 12%  ABSTRAK  Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui Tingkat Kesehatan Bank dengan objek Bank Perkreditan Rakyat Syariah yang terdaftar di Otoritas Jasa Keuangan pada tahun 2015-2019. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian desktiptif dengan pendekatan kualitatif. Penilaian dengan metode Risk-Based Bank Rating (RBBR) terdiri dari empat faktor yaitu Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings dan Capital dari setiap bank. Risk Profile terdiri dari risiko kredit dan risiko likuiditas. Risiko kredit diukur dengan menggunakan NPF dan risiko likuiditas diukur dengan menggunakan FDR. Faktor Earnings diukur dengan rasio ROA, ROE dan NIM, faktor Capital dihitung dengan rasio CAR. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan hasil yang memperoleh predikat kurang sehat bahkan cukup sehat atas rasio NPF, FDR, ROA, ROE dan NIM, sedangkan pada rasio CAR pada 3 tahun terakhir memperoleh predikat Sangat Sehat sesuai ketentuan Bank Indonesia yaitu melebihi 12%.

scholarly journals PENGARUH PENERAPAN GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE TERHADAP PROFITABILITAS PADA BANK UMUM SYARIAH PERIODE 2014-2018

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 108
Author(s):  
Putri Alma Gholy ◽  
Prameswara Samofa Nadya
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Quantitative Method ◽  
Annual Report ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Islamic Banks ◽  
Self Assessment ◽  
Return On Equity ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Independent Variable ◽  
Assessment Reports

The application of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) is the way to control a corporate professionally and transparently to reach goals agreed by both shareholders and stakeholders. So, it is expected Islamic banks can perform with a good quality and consistently implementing GCG mechanism along with increasing profits. Therefore, this research focused on appraising profitability increasing with Return on Asset (ROA) and Return on Equity (ROE) as indicator, together with appraising GCG with self assessment reports based on 11 criteria of composite rate valuation. This research used quantitative method from GCG reports and annual report of Islamic Banks from 2014-2018 period, as secondary data. The result was GCG as independent variable positively and significantly effecting ROA and ROE.

HEALTH ASSESSMENT OF GOVERNMENT BANKS IN INDONESIA USING RISK-BASED BANK RATING

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 171-190
Author(s):  
Melvina Permatasari ◽  
Peni Sawitri
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Health Assessment ◽  
Liquidity Risk ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Analysis Tool ◽  
Self Assessment ◽  
Public Funds ◽  
Banking Regulations ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Descriptive Method

The health of a bank can be defined as the ability of a bank to conduct banking operational normally and be able to satisfy all its obligations well by means of accordance with the applicable banking regulations. The health assessment is very important to a bank because the bank managing public funds entrusted to the bank. Accordance with PBI 13/1/PBI/2011 numbers that have been set on January 5, 2011, and was implemented by the bank in July 2011, CAMELS method is no longer used as a method to measure the health of a bank. CAMELS method was replaced by the RGEC method (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, and Capital) to measure and assess the health of a bank. This research conducted on the four Government Banks (Bank Mandiri, BNI, BTN, and BTN) from the year 2009-2012 with comparative descriptive method. The results of Risk Profile factor that use the analysis tool of NPL to measure Credit Risk showed that Bank Mandiri, BNI, BRI into the category of the healthy bank, while BTN decreased slightly in the rankings in 2012 from a healthy bank into the fairly healthy bank. Meanwhile, the assessment results of liquidity risk that calculated use analysis tool of LDR showed that Bank Mandiri and BNI into the category of the very healthy bank, BRI tend to stable with healthy bank category, but BTN into the category of poorly bank. The result of self-assessment Good Corporate Governance showed that four Government Banks have been successfully implemented Good Corporate Governance very well. The result of Earnings factor that uses the analysis tool of ROA showed that four Government Banks as a healthy bank. The result of the Capital factor that uses the analysis tool of CAR generally showed that four Government Banks into the category of the very healthy bank. Keywords: Health of Bank, Assessment, Government Bank, RGEC, Good Corporate Governance

scholarly journals Analisis Perbandingan Tingkat Kesehatan Bank dengan Menggunakan Pendekatan RGEC (Studi pada PT. Bank Mandiri (Persero), Tbk dan PT. Bank Negara Indonesia (Persero), Tbk Periode 2014-2018)

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 342
Author(s):  
Marissa Putriana ◽  
Susi Artati
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Risk Indicators ◽  
Risk Indicator ◽  
Self Assessment ◽  
Value Analysis ◽  
Descriptive Research ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Health Level ◽  
Quantitative Descriptive

This research aims to analyse how the health level comparison of PT Bank Mandiri (Persero), Tbk with PT Bank Negara Indonesia (Persero), Tbk using RGEC (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, Capital) approach In 2014-2018. The type of research used is quantitative descriptive research. Research results show the health level of Bank Mandiri and BNI in 2014-2018 overall healthy. Risk Profile Bank Mandiri and BNI bank with the credit risk indicator gained a healthy predicate and with the risk indicators of the liquidity of both banks earned a fairly healthy predicate. Assessment of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) based on Self Assessment showed that Bank Mandiri obtained very good predicate while BNI Bank obtained good predicate. The Earnings assessment of the ROA and NIM ratio analysis and Capital valuation based on the CAR value analysis showed that Bank Mandiri and BNI Bank gained a very healthy predicate.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document