scholarly journals Antimicrobial Prophylaxis for Caesarean Delivery; A comparative study between different agents

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Afroditi Ziogou ◽  
Ioannis Kokolakis ◽  
Fanourios Makrygiannakis ◽  
Antonis Makrigiannakis

Antimicrobial prophylaxis is commonly used for pre-intra and post-operative caesarean delivery. Caesarean delivery is still the single most important risk factor for puerperal infection. Post-caesarean infections include wound infections, endomyometritis, bacteraemia, septic shock, septic pelvic vein thrombophlebitis, necrotising fasciitis, pelvic abscess, dehiscence of the wound or evisceration. The goal of antimicrobial prophylaxis is to put a stop to postoperative infection of the surgical site, the use of therapeutic antibiotics, additional surgical interventions, longer duration of hospital stay, to decrease postoperative infectious morbidity and mortality and the cost of postoperative health care. A post-caesarean wound infection detected prior to hospital discharge will lead to prolongation of hospital stay and will increase the hospitalisation costs and need of readmission. Both the American College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists and the American Society of Health-Care System Pharmacists have introduced single-dose prophylactic protocols using a heterogeneity of agents (penicillins, cephalosporins, clindamycin and azithromycin). Women undergoing caesarean delivery have a greater risk of developing infection compared to women who have a vaginal birth by 5 to 20-fold. The use of prophylaxis in patients undergoing a low-risk Caesarean Delivery remains controversial.

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (23) ◽  
pp. 3868-3874 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neal J. Meropol ◽  
Deborah Schrag ◽  
Thomas J. Smith ◽  
Therese M. Mulvey ◽  
Robert M. Langdon ◽  
...  

Advances in early detection, prevention, and treatment have resulted in consistently falling cancer death rates in the United States. In parallel with these advances have come significant increases in the cost of cancer care. It is well established that the cost of health care (including cancer care) in the United States is growing more rapidly than the overall economy. In part, this is a result of the prices and rapid uptake of new agents and other technologies, including advances in imaging and therapeutic radiology. Conventional understanding suggests that high prices may reflect the costs and risks associated with the development, production, and marketing of new drugs and technologies, many of which are valued highly by physicians, patients, and payers. The increasing cost of cancer care impacts many stakeholders who play a role in a complex health care system. Our patients are the most vulnerable because they often experience uneven insurance coverage, leading to financial strain or even ruin. Other key groups include pharmaceutical manufacturers that pass along research, development, and marketing costs to the consumer; providers of cancer care who dispense increasingly expensive drugs and technologies; and the insurance industry, which ultimately passes costs to consumers. Increasingly, the economic burden of health care in general, and high-quality cancer care in particular, will be less and less affordable for an increasing number of Americans unless steps are taken to curb current trends. The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) is committed to improving cancer prevention, diagnosis, and treatment and eliminating disparities in cancer care through support of evidence-based and cost-effective practices. To address this goal, ASCO established a Cost of Care Task Force, which has developed this Guidance Statement on the Cost of Cancer Care. This Guidance Statement provides a concise overview of the economic issues facing stakeholders in the cancer community. It also recommends that the following steps be taken to address immediate needs: recognition that patient-physician discussions regarding the cost of care are an important component of high-quality care; the design of educational and support tools for oncology providers to promote effective communication about costs with patients; and the development of resources to help educate patients about the high cost of cancer care to help guide their decision making regarding treatment options. Looking to the future, this Guidance Statement also recommends that ASCO develop policy positions to address the underlying factors contributing to the increased cost of cancer care. Doing so will require a clear understanding of the factors that drive these costs, as well as potential modifications to the current cancer care system to ensure that all Americans have access to high-quality, cost-effective care.


2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (22) ◽  
pp. 2373-2379 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard L. Schilsky ◽  
Dina L. Michels ◽  
Amy H. Kearbey ◽  
Peter Paul Yu ◽  
Clifford A. Hudis

Today is a time of unprecedented opportunity and challenge in health care generally and cancer care in particular. An explosion of scientific knowledge, the rapid introduction of new drugs and technologies, and the unprecedented escalation in the cost of health care challenge physicians to quickly assimilate new information and appropriately deploy new advances while also delivering efficient and high-quality care to a rapidly growing and aging patient population. At the same time, big data, with its potential to drive rapid understanding and innovation, promises to transform the health care industry, as it has many others already. CancerLinQ is an initiative of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and its Institute for Quality, developed to build on these opportunities and address these challenges by collecting information from the electronic health records of large numbers of patients with cancer. CancerLinQ is, first and foremost, a quality measurement and reporting system through which oncologists can harness the depth and power of their patients' clinical records and other data to improve the care they deliver. The development and deployment of CancerLinQ raises many important questions about the use of big data in health care. This article focuses on the US federal regulatory pathway by which CancerLinQ will accept patient records and the approach of ASCO toward stewardship of the information.


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (75) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Fátima Souza Melo de Andrade ◽  
Luiza Nauane Borges Benevides

A busca por qualidade, faturamento correto da conta hospitalar e redução de gastos indevidos é a perspectiva atual das operadoras de saúde. Nessa linha de pensamento, o objetivo principal foi analisar a redução de custos hospitalares de uma operadora de saúde do estado de Sergipe, Brasil, entre janeiro e outubro de 2018, por meio da auditoria concorrente. Trata-se de um estudo descritivo, com abordagem quanti-qualitativa, do tipo relato de experiência. A análise qualitativa tratou-se de observações a partir da vivência como profissional. Na análise quantitativa, utilizou-se da estatística univariada para descrição dos indicadores e das variações. Para identificar a relação entre o indicador econômico, financeiro e os de qualidade, foi utilizada a técnica de correlação de Pearson. Como resultado, analisou-se que as glosas recuperaram perdas econômicas, mas não aumentaram de forma linear o custo efetividade para a operadora de saúde. Houve correlação moderada negativa (p<0,001) entre permanência hospitalar e custo-efetividade da auditoria concorrente. Enquanto que a desospitalização obteve uma correlação positiva forte (p<0,001), com o custo efetividade da auditoria concorrente. A partir destes dados, concluiu-se que o crescimento da desospitalização e a diminuição da permanência hospitalar impactaram no aumento da eficácia da auditoria concorrente.Palavras-chave: Auditoria de Enfermagem. Avaliação de Custo-Efetividade. Economia e Organizações de Saúde. ABSTRACTThe search for quality, correct billing of the hospital bill and reduction of undue expenses is the current perspective of health care providers. In this line of thought, the main objective was to analyze the reduction of hospital costs of a health care provider in the state of Sergipe, Brazil, between January and October of 2018, through a concurrent audit. This is a descriptive study, with quantitative-qualitative approach, of the type of experience report. The qualitative analysis was about observations from the experience as a professional. In the quantitative analysis, univariate statistics were used to describe indicators and variations. In order to identify the relationship between economic, financial and quality indicators, the Pearson correlation technique was used. As a result, it was analyzed that the glosses recovered economic losses, but did not linearly increase the cost effectiveness for the health care provider. There was a moderate negative correlation (p <0.001) between hospital stay and cost-effectiveness of the concurrent audit. While the de-hospitalization obtained a strong positive correlation (p <0.001), with the cost effectiveness of the concurrent audit. Based on these data, it was concluded that the increase in de-hospitalization and the decrease in hospital stay had an impact on the effectiveness of the concurrent audit. Keywords: Nursing Audit. Cost-effectiveness Evaluation. Health Care Economics and Organizations.


Hand ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 831-836 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricardo Ortiz ◽  
Sezai Ozkan ◽  
Neal C. Chen ◽  
Kyle R. Eberlin

Background: Firework injuries to the hand can be devastating due to the explosive and ballistic nature of these devices. The aim of this study was to describe the injury and treatment characteristics of patients requiring surgery for firework-related hand injuries and to investigate which factors are associated with an increased utilization of health care resources. Methods: A retrospective chart review of patients undergoing surgery for firework-related hand injuries at two American College of Surgeons level I trauma centers between 2005 and 2016 was performed. Twenty cases were identified. These patients were evaluated for demographics, injury characteristics, number and types of surgical interventions, length of stay, and utilization of health care resources. Bivariate analyses were performed to investigate which factors were associated with increased consumption of health care resources. Results: Injuries ranged from digital nerve injuries to traumatic amputation. Patients underwent a median of 3 surgical operations. More than half the patients underwent flap or skin graft coverage of a soft tissue defect. The median length of hospital stay was 7 days. Factors found to be associated with an increased utilization of surgical and hospital resources included a first web space injury, thumb fracture, and traumatic amputation of any digit. Conclusions: The morbidity inflicted by firework injuries to individual patients is substantial. Patients with severe injuries undergo a median of three surgical operations and have a long duration of initial hospital stay. Knowing which factors are associated with an increased utilization of resources can help prognosticate these preventable injuries.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 5620-5620
Author(s):  
Kenshi Suzuki ◽  
Tomofumi Yamamoto ◽  
Masahiro Ikeda ◽  
Tomomi Takei ◽  
Nobuhiro Tsukada ◽  
...  

Abstract Background & Objective The therapy of multiple myeloma (MM) has improved greatly over the last decade. However, the rise in health care costs has become a big problem. Therefore, it is necessary to consider the cost-effectiveness including Quality of Life (QoL). In this study, we assessed the real-world cost-effectiveness of MM treatment. Methods & Patients A total of 209 MM patients who were newly diagnosed and treated only at Japanese Red Cross Medical Center (JRC-MC) from January 2006 to December 2015 were registered for this retrospective research. Those patients who were treated at other institute than JRC-MC were excluded. All of the costs for MM treatment in hematology department were analyzed. The costs were calculated based on the health care costs spent in hematology department. Overall survival was evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier method. All of the costs were calculated in US dollars based on average value from 2006 to 2015 (1USD = 100.294 Japanese yen). Result First, the cost paid for treatment of 84 patients who died from symptom onset to death was about 0.14 million USD. We also calculated the total annual health care cost for their patients from 2006 to 2015. Annual cost of all MM patients at 2006 was 0.454 million USD, and the cost at 2015 was 7.505 million USD. The cost/patient-year of 2006, when novel agents were not obtainable was 21,656 USD, and that cost of 2015, when three new agents were available was 55,608 USD. These results showed that the costs of MM treatment became 2.56 times higher in the past 10 years. Individual costs for bortezomib, thalidomide, and lenalidomide is shown in Fig.1. Since 2011 to 2014, the ratio of cost of novel agents exceeded 50%. Secondly, overall survival was evaluated by statistical analysis. The median survival from diagnosis was 56 (range, 0-117) months 95% CI (45.12-66.88). We divided patients into 5 subgroups, according to the time of diagnosis. (1)2006: 21 patients, (2)2007-2008: 26 patients, (3)2009-2010: 38 patients, (4)2011-2012: 42 patients, (5)2013-2015: 82 patients. In Japan, the novel agents such as bortezomib, thalidomide, lenalidomide were approved the year 2006, 2008, 2010 respectively. Median survival of subgroup (1), (2), and (3) were 56 months 95% CI (42.66-69.33), 55 months 95% CI (19.12-90.87) and 54 months 95% CI (36.42-71.57) respectively. Median survival of subgroup (4) and (5) have not been reached. Then we investigated the treatment costs in these groups. In each subgroup the average annual cost was 332, 518, 507, 588 and 631 USD respectively. Compared to subgroup (1), the cost of other groups were significantly high. These results showed that the impact of three novel agents on medical cost were significant. We also investigated the relationship between health care costs and the length of hospital stay or autologous stem cell transplantation. There were no statistically significant differences among them, however, there was tendency that the length of hospital stay shortened by time; Average length of total hospital stay the subgroup (1), (2), and (3) were 205, 125 and 56 days respectively. Subgroup (4) and (5) showed also shortened length of hospital stays, although observation years subgroup (4) and (5) were short (date was not shown). Among 5 subgroups the cases of received autologous stem cell transplantation were not stastically differences (total 56 patients). Conclusion We revealed the real-world costs of MM treatment in a single-institute, by following up individual patients sequentially. Health care costs for treatment of MM increased drastically, by introduction of three novel agents. We also showed that the introduction of three novel agents shorten hospital stay, which leads to improve QoL. Therefore, bortezomib, thalidomide and lenalidomide had the significant impact of QoL. After the further approval of novel agents in Japan, health care costs will be even higher but on the other hand, they might bring positive impacts on OS and QoL. Our study clearly indicated the importance of considering the balance of cost and effectiveness for the MM treatment is important. Character count: 3477(excluding spaces) Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2009 ◽  
Vol 361 (15) ◽  
pp. 1421-1423 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atul A. Gawande ◽  
Elliott S. Fisher ◽  
Jonathan Gruber ◽  
Meredith B. Rosenthal

Author(s):  
Reddy V

Unique is a method that could help diagnosing a psychiatry condition, such as autism, by properly completing a patient's clinical history, with a comprehensive physical examination. It is important to diagnose individuals with autism spectrum, since providing a good oral health care to these people requires that the dentist has specialized knowledge, an increased awareness and care while performing the treatment, and even patient support strategies which must be adapted to each case. Every patient with autism is different to the rest, which makes their diagnosis and treatment difficult. Likewise, not all dentists are qualified to provide a good oral health care to patients diagnosed with autism spectrum, so many families must fight with that barrier every day. Finally, not every person with autism, or their families, are able to afford the cost of dental care with a qualified dentist, which is an important concern for them.


2011 ◽  
Vol 78 (4) ◽  
pp. 415-436
Author(s):  
Mark S. Latkovic

In this paper, I will first briefly discuss why the Catholic Church has always had and continues to have such a great concern for bioethics or health-care ethics, while I also highlight the biblical roots of this concern. Secondly, I will describe some of the ways in which the Catholic Church in America has exercised a positive influence in the field of bioethics, or what was in the mid-twentieth century often called medical ethics. Thirdly, I will sketch how and why the Church has to a large extent lost this influence, tracing how secularization both inside and outside the Church contributed to the destruction of the so-called “Catholic ghetto” and to the assimilation of ideas from the culture that were often alien to the Gospel and sound moral reasoning. Finally, I will offer some general reflections on how the Church can regain her influence in this area—especially with the goal in mind of building a culture of life in American society—and how Catholic scholars in particular can contribute to this effort by following the lead of the late Pope John Paul II's 1995 encyclical on bioethics, Evangelium vitae, whose twentieth anniversary is fast approaching.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kiyoaki Sugiura ◽  
Yuki Seo ◽  
Takayuki Takahashi ◽  
Hideyuki Tokura ◽  
Yasuhiro Ito ◽  
...  

Abstract Background TAS-102 plus bevacizumab is an anticipated combination regimen for patients who have metastatic colorectal cancer. However, evidence supporting its use for this indication is limited. We compared the cost-effectiveness of TAS-102 plus bevacizumab combination therapy with TAS-102 monotherapy for patients with chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer. Method Markov decision modeling using treatment costs, disease-free survival, and overall survival was performed to examine the cost-effectiveness of TAS-102 plus bevacizumab combination therapy and TAS-102 monotherapy. The Japanese health care payer’s perspective was adopted. The outcomes were modeled on the basis of published literature. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) between the two treatment regimens was the primary outcome. Sensitivity analysis was performed and the effect of uncertainty on the model parameters were investigated. Results TAS-102 plus bevacizumab had an ICER of $21,534 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained compared with TAS-102 monotherapy. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that TAS-102 monotherapy was more cost-effective than TAS-102 and bevacizumab combination therapy at a willingness-to-pay of under $50,000 per QALY gained. Conclusions TAS-102 and bevacizumab combination therapy is a cost-effective option for patients who have metastatic colorectal cancer in the Japanese health care system.


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 514.2-514
Author(s):  
M. Merino ◽  
O. Braçe ◽  
A. González ◽  
Á. Hidalgo-Vega ◽  
M. Garrido-Cumbrera ◽  
...  

Background:Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) is a disease associated with a high number of comorbidities, chronic pain, functional disability, and resource consumption.Objectives:This study aimed to estimate the burden of disease for patients diagnosed with AS in Spain.Methods:Data from 578 unselected patients with AS were collected in 2016 for the Spanish Atlas of Axial Spondyloarthritis via an online survey. The estimated costs were: Direct Health Care Costs (borne by the National Health System, NHS) and Direct Non-Health Care Costs (borne by patients) were estimated with the bottom-up method, multiplying the resource consumption by the unit price of each resource. Indirect Costs (labour productivity losses) were estimated using the human capital method. Costs were compared between levels of disease activity using the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) score (<4 or low inflammation versus ≥4 or high inflammation) and risk of mental distress using the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) score (<3 or low risk versus ≥3 or high risk).Results:The average annual cost per patient with AS in 2015 amounted to €11,462.3 (± 13,745.5) per patient. Direct Health Care Cost meant an annual average of €6,999.8 (± 9,216.8) per patient, to which an annual average of €611.3 (± 1,276.5) per patient associated with Direct Non-Health Care Cost borne by patients must be added. Pharmacological treatment accounted for the largest percentage of the costs borne by the NHS (64.6%), while for patients most of the cost was attributed to rehabilitative therapies and/or physical activity (91%). The average annual Indirect Costs derived from labour productivity losses were €3,851.2 (± 8,484.0) per patient, mainly associated to absenteeism. All categories showed statistically significant differences (p<0.05) between BASDAI groups (<4 vs ≥4) except for the Direct Non-Healthcare Cost, showing a progressive rise in cost from low to high inflammation. Regarding the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12), all categories showed statistically significant differences between GHQ-12 (<3 vs ≥3), with higher costs associated with higher risk of poor mental health (Table 1).Table 1.Average annual costs per patient according to BASDAI and GHQ-12 groups (in Euros, 2015)NDirect Health CostsDirect Non-Health CostsIndirect CostsTotal CostBASDAI<4917,592.0*557.32,426.5*10,575.8*≥43769,706.9*768.05,104.8*15,579.7*Psychological distress (GHQ-12)<31468,146.8*493.6*3,927.2*12,567.6*≥32609,772.9*807.2*4,512.3*15,092.5*Total5786,999.8611.33,851.211,462.3* p <0.05Conclusion:Direct Health Care Costs, and those attributed to pharmacological treatment in particular, accounted for the largest component of the cost associated with AS. However, a significant proportion of the overall costs can be further attributed to labour productivity losses.Acknowledgments:Funded by Novartis Farmacéutica S.A.Disclosure of Interests:María Merino: None declared, Olta Braçe: None declared, Almudena González: None declared, Álvaro Hidalgo-Vega: None declared, Marco Garrido-Cumbrera: None declared, Jordi Gratacos-Masmitja Grant/research support from: a grant from Pfizzer to study implementation of multidisciplinary units to manage PSA in SPAIN, Consultant of: Pfizzer, MSD, ABBVIE, Janssen, Amgen, BMS, Novartis, Lilly, Speakers bureau: Pfizzer, MSD, ABBVIE, Janssen, Amgen, BMS, Novartis, Lilly


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document