scholarly journals Comparison of Open Repair vs. the One-Stage Hybrid Extra-Anatomic Technique for Distal Aortic Arch Disease Treatment: Mid-term Outcomes With a Risk-Adjusted Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiyu Qiao ◽  
Suwei Chen ◽  
Rutao Guo ◽  
Yongliang Zhong ◽  
Yipeng Ge ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Operative Mortality ◽  
Open Repair ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Postoperative Treatment ◽  
Elephant Trunk ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
One Stage ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Cord Injury ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

Objective: This study aims to compare the short- and mid-term outcomes of the stented elephant trunk (SET) procedure combined with supra-arch branch reconstruction and one-stage hybrid arch repair combined thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) with extra-anatomic bypass in the management of distal arch disease.Methods: From January 2009 to January 2019, 97 patients underwent one-stage hybrid arch repair combined with TEVAR with extra-anatomic bypass (HAR group), and 206 patients underwent the SET procedure with supra-arch branch reconstruction (SET group). We used inverse-probability-of treatment weighting (IPTW) to adjust baseline differences.Results: Before IPTW adjustment, there was no significant difference in operative mortality between the two groups (5.2 vs. 1.0%, P = 0.064). The incidences of stroke, spinal cord injury (SCI), acute kidney injury (AKI), and endoleak also showed no significant differences (4.1 vs. 0.5%, P = 0.066; 2.1 vs. 1.5%, P = 1.000; 0 vs. 1.0%, P = 0.831; 6.2 vs. 1.9%, P = 0.113, respectively). After IPTW adjustment, the incidences of stroke, SCI, and AKI showed no significant differences between the two groups (1.8 vs. 1.1%, P = 0.138; 0.8 vs. 1.6%, P = 0.448; and 0 vs. 0.7%, P = 0.148, respectively). However, the HAR group tended to have higher operative mortality and incidence of endoleak than the SET group (12.4 vs. 1.3%, P = 0.01; 9.9 vs. 1.8%, P = 0.031, respectively). In the multivariate analysis, open repair decreased the risks of endoleak (odds ratio [OR], 0.171, 95% CI, 0.060–0.401; P < 0.001) and operative mortality (OR, 0.093, 95% CI, 0.027–0.238; P < 0.001). The overall survival and event-free survival of the HAR group were significantly lower than those of the SET group (P < 0.001).Conclusion: One-stage hybrid arch repair combined TEVAR with extra-anatomic bypass and the SET procedure with supra-arch branch reconstruction both provided good postoperative treatment outcomes for distal arch disease. However, hybrid arch repair increased the risks of endoleak and operative mortality. The SET procedure provided better mid-term survival than hybrid arch repair without increasing operative mortality. Carefully selecting the indications for the procedure, while receiving close long-term follow-up, may improve the survival rate of patients undergoing hybrid arch repair.

EP.TH.1043Outcomes of liver resections by trainee surgeons versus consultant surgeon – a single centre experience

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Umasankar Mathuram Thiyagarajan ◽  
Alaa Al-Mohammad ◽  
Stephanie Goh ◽  
Siong-Seng Liau ◽  
Emmanuel Huguet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Liver Resection ◽  
Hospital Readmission ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Bile Leak ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Consultant Surgeon ◽  
Liver Resections ◽  
Trainee Group ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

Abstract Introduction Liver resection is a most effective treatment for patients with operable primary or secondary cancer deposits. The role of trainee as a lead surgeon versus consultant surgeon performing liver resections and its impact on surgical outcomes had never been reported. Methods and Materials This study was aimed to assess the liver resection outcomes including operative time, acute kidney injury (AKI), bile leak, sepsis, mortality and hospital readmission within 3 months. A total of 320 liver resections from Addenbookes Hospital at Cambridge between 2015 to 2017 were included in this study. All liver resections were performed under supervision of the consultant surgeon who is either scrubbed or unscrubbed in theatre. Trainee surgeons have performed 116 of 320 as lead surgeon and the consultant surgeons performed the remaining 204. Results The mean operative time was 413±129 versus 383±118 (P = 0.41) minutes in trainee surgeons and consultant surgeons respectively. The incidence of postoperative AKI were similar in between the groups (5/116 versus 11/204;P=0.79). Although the bile leak was numerically high in the trainee group, did not reach statistical difference (13/116 versus 12/204;P=0.12); similar results noted in the incidence of sepsis too (3/116 versus 4/204;P=070). Mortality, hospital readmission at 3 months were (1/204 versus 1/116;P=1) and (2/116 versus 4/204;P=1) respectively. No significant difference was observed. Conclusion Liver resections performed by the trainee surgeons under supervision appeared to be safe without increasing the operative time, morbidity, mortality and hospital readmission at 90 days. Further multicentre prospective study with long-term follow up is recommended.

scholarly journals A teljes nagyér-transzpozíción átesett betegek Senning- és Mustard-féle műtéti megoldásának hosszú távú utánkövetése. Eredmények a CSONGRAD Regiszterből

2016 ◽  
Vol 157 (3) ◽  
pp. 104-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kálmán Havasi ◽  
Anita Kalapos ◽  
Krisztina Berek ◽  
Péter Domsik ◽  
Mária Kohári ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Functional Capacity ◽  
Heart Diseases ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Mortality And Morbidity ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

Introduction: Transposition of the great arteries is one of the most common cyanotic congenital heart diseases. Aim: The present study aimed to examine and compare long-term survival, functional grading, arrhytmologic and quality of life control in patients with transposition of the great arteries following Senning- and Mustard-operations. Methods: The present study comprised 85 patients with transposition of the great arteries, of whom Senning-operation was performed in 37 cases and Mustard-operation in 48 subjects. Follow-up study was performed in all cases. Results: The success rate of long-term follow-up proved to be 74%. Twelve out of the 31 Senning-operated and 16 out of 32 Mustard-operated patients died during the follow-up (39% vs. 50%, p = 0.45). Neither features of heart failure, nor those of arrhythmias showed differences between the groups, but parameters of quality of life and functional capacity proved to be favourable in Senning-operated patients. Conclusions: There is no significant difference in mortality and morbidity of patients with transposition of the great arteries following Mustard- and Senning-operations. Regarding to long-term follow-up quality of life and functional capacity of Senning-operated patients were more favourable. Orv. Hetil., 2016, 157(3), 104–110.

Long-term follow-up of a phase III study of three versus four cycles of bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin in favorable-prognosis germ-cell tumors: the Indian University experience.

1998 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 702-706 ◽  
Author(s):  
S B Saxman ◽  
D Finch ◽  
R Gonin ◽  
L H Einhorn
Keyword(s):  
Germ Cell ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Germ Cell Tumors ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Favorable Prognosis ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

PURPOSE In a previously reported randomized Southeastern Cancer Study Group (SECSG) trial, three cycles of chemotherapy were found to be equivalent to four cycles in patients with favorable-prognosis germ-cell cancer. We have conducted a follow-up analysis of patients treated at Indiana University (Indianapolis, IN) to compare long-term survival between the two groups and to examine factors associated with survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS Sixty-nine patients with minimal-stage and 49 patients with moderate-stage disseminated germ-cell tumors were randomized to either three or four courses of bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP) administered every 3 weeks. Median follow-up time is 10.1 years (range, 7 months to 12.6 years). Ninety-two percent of patients have an actual follow-up time of > 5 years, and 97.5% of patients have an actual follow-up time of > 3 years. RESULTS Survival analysis shows no significant difference between the two treatment groups in terms of overall (P = .80) or disease-free (P = .93) survival. Several clinical variables were examined by univariate analysis; only serum human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) had an impact on survival. There were two disease-related deaths in 104 patients with HCG < or = 1,000 mIU/mL and five disease-related deaths in 14 patients with HCG greater than 1,000 mIU/mL (P < .001). Ninety-eight percent (95% CI, 95.2 to 100) of patients with favorable prognosis germ-cell tumor with an initial HCG of < or = 1,000 mIU/mL are alive without evidence of disease at 5+ years. CONCLUSION With long-term follow-up, there is no statistically significant difference in survival between three or four cycles of BEP chemotherapy in patients with favorable prognosis germ-cell carcinoma. Serum HCG elevation of greater than 1,000 mIU/mL is a significant predictor of poor outcome in patients with otherwise good-risk disease.

scholarly journals PORTAL PRESSURE DECREASE AFTER ESOPHAGOGASTRIC DEVASCULARIZATION AND SPLENECTOMY IN SCHISTOSOMIASIS: LONG-TERM VARICES BEHAVIOR, REBLEEDING RATE, AND ROLE OF ENDOSCOPIC TREATMENT

2018 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 170-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Walter De Biase da SILVA NETO ◽  
Thiago Miranda TREDICCI ◽  
Fabricio Ferreira COELHO ◽  
Fabio Ferrari MAKDISSI ◽  
Paulo HERMAN
Keyword(s):  
Portal Hypertension ◽  
Esophageal Varices ◽  
Endoscopic Treatment ◽  
Portal Pressure ◽  
Postoperative Treatment ◽  
Pressure Decrease ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Pressure Fall

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Schistosomiasis is an endemic health problem affecting about four million people. The hepatosplenic form of the disease is characterized by periportal hepatic fibrosis, pre-sinusoidal portal hypertension and splenomegaly. Liver function is preserved, being varices bleeding the main complication of the disease. The surgical treatment used in the majority of centers for the prevention of rebleeding is esophagogastric devascularization and splenectomy. Most authors reported better results with the association of surgical and postoperative endoscopic treatment. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the intra operative portal pressure decrease and esophageal varices behavior and rebleeding rates in patients submitted to surgical and postoperative endoscopic treatment after long-term follow-up. METHODS: A retrospective study of 36 patients with schistosomiasis with, at least, one previous bleeding from esophageal varices rupture submitted to esophagogastric devascularization and splenectomy, added to endoscopic varices postoperative treatment was performed. Patients were stratified according to the intra operative portal pressure decrease in two groups: reduction below and above 30%. Long-term varices presence, size and bleeding recurrence were evaluated. RESULTS: Regarding varices behavior, no significant influence was observed in both groups of portal pressure fall. Regarding bleeding recurrence, despite three times more frequent in the group with lower portal pressure fall, no significant difference was observed. All patients were submitted to postoperative endoscopic treatment. CONCLUSION: Esophageal varices banding, rather than portal pressure decrease, seems to be the main responsible factor for good results after combination of two therapies (surgery and endoscopy) for patients with portal hypertension due to schistosomiasis; further studies are necessary to confirm this hypothesis.

scholarly journals Multicentre experience with two frozen elephant trunk prostheses in the treatment of acute aortic dissection†

2019 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. 572-578 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tim Berger ◽  
Gabriel Weiss ◽  
Andreas Voetsch ◽  
Zsuzsanna Arnold ◽  
Maximilian Kreibich ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Dissection ◽  
Stent Graft ◽  
Acute Aortic Dissection ◽  
False Lumen ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Frozen Elephant Trunk ◽  
Elephant Trunk ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Cord Injury ◽  
Aortic Interventions

Abstract OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to evaluate early- and mid-term outcome and aortic remodelling in patients undergoing implantation of 2 different frozen elephant trunk prostheses, either the Thoraflex™ hybrid (Vascutek, Inchinnan, UK) and the E-vita Open (Jotec Inc., Hechingen, Germany) for acute aortic dissection. METHODS All consecutive patients [n = 88; median age 59 (49–67) years; 69% male] undergoing surgery with a frozen elephant trunk prosthesis for acute aortic dissection from August 2005 until March 2018 were included in this study. The Thoraflex™ device was implanted in 55 patients and the E-vita Open graft in 33 patients. RESULTS Preoperative characteristics did not differ significantly between groups. There was also no statistically significant difference in postoperative outcome: in-hospital mortality (11% vs 12%; P > 0.99), stroke (18% vs 6%; P = 0.12) and spinal cord injury (6% vs 6%; P > 0.99). While there was no statistically significant difference in the occurrence of distal stent graft-induced new entries (16% vs 18%; P = 0.77), there was a significantly higher rate of secondary endovascular aortic interventions in the Thoraflex™ hybrid group (22% vs 0%; P = 0.003). There was a trend towards a higher rate of false lumen thrombosis at the level of the stent graft (74% vs 95%; P = 0.085) and was comparable at the thoraco-abdominal transition (53% vs 80%; P = 0.36) 1 year after implantation of the prostheses. CONCLUSIONS In this comparison of 2 frozen elephant trunk prostheses, there is no evidence that different surgical techniques influence in-hospital outcome. At 1-year follow-up, patients who underwent implantation of the E-vita Open prosthesis showed a significantly reduced rate of secondary aortic interventions and a trend towards a higher rate of false lumen thrombosis which might be attributed to a longer coverage of the descending aorta due to a longer stent graft design and significantly more frequent implantation in zone 3.

Long-Term Follow-Up After Spinal Cord Injury in Canada

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark I. Tonack ◽  
Sander L. Hitzig ◽  
B. Catharine Craven ◽  
Kent A. Campbell ◽  
Kathryn A. Boschen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Spinal Cord Injury ◽  
Cord Injury ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

OPEN HAEMORRHOIDS SURGERY IN SPINAL CORD INJURY PATIENTS

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Khaled Hassan
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Spinal Cord Injury ◽  
Anal Fissure ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Anal Fissures ◽  
Cord Injury ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Grade Iii

This Pilot retrospective research conducted on the results of open surgery in patients with Grade III and IV haemorrhoids With SCI. No major complications had arisen at 6 weeks post-operative and all wounds had healed, but 1 patient Anal fissure recurrence. 75% of patients reported a substantial increase in anorectal anorexia during long-term follow-up. With symptoms. Five patients reported recurrences: three haemorrhoids (18 percent) and two anal fissures (25 percent).   Keywords: Haemorrhoids, Pilot retrospective research, Anorectal Anorexia.

Long-term survival of the nasal NK/T cell lymphoma

2008 ◽  
Vol 149 (17) ◽  
pp. 801-805
Author(s):  
Péter Rajnics ◽  
László Krenács ◽  
András Kenéz ◽  
Zoltán Járay ◽  
Enikő Bagdi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Treatment Guidelines ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Diagnostic Procedures ◽  
T Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Barr Virus ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Nk T Cell

The nasal NK/T cell lymphoma is a rare, extranodal non-Hodgkin lymphoma in western civilizations, which has poor prognosis. The Epstein–Barr virus can be detected in tumor cells in nearly all cases. There are no definite treatment guidelines in our days. There is no significant difference in survival between radiotherapy and chemotherapy according to Asian studies. In this case study we show our diagnostic procedures, our treatment options and we present the summary of this illness based on the data found in the literature.

scholarly journals Is It Definitely Clear That Long-Term Survival after Breast Cancer Surgery Is Not Affected by Anaesthetics?

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (14) ◽  
pp. 3390
Author(s):  
Mats Enlund
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Survival Data ◽  
Retrospective Studies ◽  
Breast Cancer Surgery ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
One Year

Retrospective studies indicate that cancer survival may be affected by the anaesthetic technique. Propofol seems to be a better choice than volatile anaesthetics, such as sevoflurane. The first two retrospective studies suggested better long-term survival with propofol, but not for breast cancer. Subsequent retrospective studies from Asia indicated the same. When data from seven Swedish hospitals were analysed, including 6305 breast cancer patients, different analyses gave different results, from a non-significant difference in survival to a remarkably large difference in favour of propofol, an illustration of the innate weakness in the retrospective design. The largest randomised clinical trial, registered on clinicaltrial.gov, with survival as an outcome is the Cancer and Anesthesia study. Patients are here randomised to propofol or sevoflurane. The inclusion of patients with breast cancer was completed in autumn 2017. Delayed by the pandemic, one-year survival data for the cohort were presented in November 2020. Due to the extremely good short-term survival for breast cancer, one-year survival is of less interest for this disease. As the inclusions took almost five years, there was also a trend to observe. Unsurprisingly, no difference was found in one-year survival between the two groups, and the trend indicated no difference either.

scholarly journals Comparative evaluation of posterior percutaneous endoscopy cervical discectomy using a 3.7 mm endoscope and a 6.9 mm endoscope for cervical disc herniation: a retrospective comparative cohort study

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tong Yu ◽  
Jiu-Ping Wu ◽  
Jun Zhang ◽  
Hai-Chi Yu ◽  
Qin-Yi Liu
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Large Diameter ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Cervical Disc Herniation ◽  
Cervical Disc ◽  
Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Cord Injury ◽  
Percutaneous Endoscopy

Abstract Background Posterior percutaneous endoscopy cervical discectomy (p-PECD) is an effective strategy for the treatment of cervical diseases, with a working cannula ranging from 3.7 mm to 6.9 mm in diameter. However, to date, no studies have been performed to compare the clinical outcomes of the use of endoscopes with different diameters in cervical disc herniation (CDH) patients. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of patients with unilateral CDH treated with p-PECD using a 3.7 mm endoscope and a 6.9 mm endoscope. Methods From January 2016 to June 2018, a total of 28 consecutive patients with single-level CDH who received p-PECD using either the 3.7 mm or the 6.9 mm endoscope were enrolled. The clinical results, including the surgical duration, hospitalization, visual analog scale (VAS) score and modified MacNab criteria, were evaluated. Cervical fluoroscopy, CT, and MRI were also performed during follow-up. Results Tthere was a significant difference in regard to the average identification time of the “V” point (18.608 ± 3.7607 min vs. 11.256 ± 2.7161 min, p < 0.001) and the mean removal time of the overlying tissue (16.650 ± 4.1730 min vs. 12.712 ± 3.3079 min, p < 0.05) for the use of the 3.7 mm endoscope and the 6.9 mm endoscope, respectively. The postoperative VAS and MacNab scores of the two endoscopes were significantly improved compared with those the preoperative scores (p < 0.05). Conclusion The application of both the 3.7 mm endoscope and 6.9 mm endoscope represent an effective method for the treatment of CDH in selected patients, and no significant difference can be observed in the clinical outcomes of the endoscopes. The 6.9 mm endoscope shows superiority to the 3.7 mm endoscope in terms of the efficiency of “V” point identification, the removal of overlying soft tissue and the prevention of spinal cord injury. However, the 6.9 mm endoscope may be inferior to the 3.7 mm endoscope in regards to anterior foraminal decompression due to its large diameter; this result needs to be further evaluated with the support of a large number of randomized controlled trials.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document