scholarly journals Baf45a Mediated Chromatin Remodeling Promotes Transcriptional Activation for Osteogenesis and Odontogenesis

2022 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theodore Busby ◽  
Yuechuan Chen ◽  
Tanner C. Godfrey ◽  
Mohammad Rehan ◽  
Benjamin J. Wildman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Chromatin Remodeling ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Marker Gene ◽  
Chromatin Accessibility ◽  
Tissue Specific ◽  
Mineralized Tissues ◽  
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Sequencing ◽  
Specific Regulation ◽  
Matrix Maturation

Chromatin remodeling, specifically the tissue-specific regulation in mineralized tissues, is an understudied avenue of gene regulation. Here we show that Baf45a and Baf45d, two Baf45 homologs belong to ATPase-dependent SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex, preferentially expressed in osteoblasts and odontoblasts compared to Baf45b and Baf45c. Recently, biochemical studies revealed that BAF45A associates with Polybromo-associated BAF (PBAF) complex. However, the BAF45D subunit belongs to the polymorphic canonical BRG1-associated factor (cBAF) complex. Protein profiles of osteoblast and odontoblast differentiation uncovered a significant increase of BAF45A and PBAF subunits during early osteoblast and odontoblast maturation. Chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-seq) during the bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) differentiation showed higher histone H3K9 and H3K27 acetylation modifications in the promoter of Baf45a and Baf45d and increased binding of bone and tooth specific transcription factor RUNX2. Overexpression of Baf45a in osteoblasts activates genes essential for the progression of osteoblast maturation and mineralization. Furthermore, shRNA-mediated knockdown of Baf45a in odontoblasts leads to markedly altered genes responsible for the proliferation, apoptosis, DNA repair, and modest decrease in dentinogenic marker gene expression. Assay for Transposase-Accessible Chromatin sequencing (ATAC-seq) assay in Baf45a knockout osteoblasts revealed a noticeable reduction in chromatin accessibility of osteoblast and odontoblast specific genes, along with transcription factor Atf4 and Klf4. Craniofacial mesenchyme-specific loss of Baf45a modestly reduced the mineralization of the tooth and mandibular bone. These findings indicated that BAF45A-dependent mineralized tissue-specific chromatin remodeling through PBAF-RUNX2 crosstalk results in transcriptional activation is critical for early differentiation and matrix maturation of mineralized tissues.

scholarly journals The Pu.1 Locus Is Differentially Regulated at the Level of Chromatin Structure and Noncoding Transcription by Alternate Mechanisms at Distinct Developmental Stages of Hematopoiesis

2007 ◽  
Vol 27 (21) ◽  
pp. 7425-7438 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maarten Hoogenkamp ◽  
Hanna Krysinska ◽  
Richard Ingram ◽  
Gang Huang ◽  
Rachael Barlow ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
B Cells ◽  
Regulatory Element ◽  
Precursor Cells ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Tissue Specific ◽  
Specific Regulation

ABSTRACT The Ets family transcription factor PU.1 is crucial for the regulation of hematopoietic development. Pu.1 is activated in hematopoietic stem cells and is expressed in mast cells, B cells, granulocytes, and macrophages but is switched off in T cells. Many of the transcription factors regulating Pu.1 have been identified, but little is known about how they organize Pu.1 chromatin in development. We analyzed the Pu.1 promoter and the upstream regulatory element (URE) using in vivo footprinting and chromatin immunoprecipitation assays. In B cells, Pu.1 was bound by a set of transcription factors different from that in myeloid cells and adopted alternative chromatin architectures. In T cells, Pu.1 chromatin at the URE was open and the same transcription factor binding sites were occupied as in B cells. The transcription factor RUNX1 was bound to the URE in precursor cells, but binding was down-regulated in maturing cells. In PU.1 knockout precursor cells, the Ets factor Fli-1 compensated for the lack of PU.1, and both proteins could occupy a subset of Pu.1 cis elements in PU.1-expressing cells. In addition, we identified novel URE-derived noncoding transcripts subject to tissue-specific regulation. Our results provide important insights into how overlapping, but different, sets of transcription factors program tissue-specific chromatin structures in the hematopoietic system.

scholarly journals FOXA1 defines cancer cell specificity

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. e1501473 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gaihua Zhang ◽  
Yongbing Zhao ◽  
Yi Liu ◽  
Li-Pin Kao ◽  
Xiao Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Cancer Cell ◽  
Cancer Progression ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Human Cancer ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Human Cancer Cell Lines ◽  
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Sequencing ◽  
Pioneer Transcription Factor ◽  
Specific Regulation

A transcription factor functions differentially and/or identically in multiple cell types. However, the mechanism for cell-specific regulation of a transcription factor remains to be elucidated. We address how a single transcription factor, forkhead box protein A1 (FOXA1), forms cell-specific genomic signatures and differentially regulates gene expression in four human cancer cell lines (HepG2, LNCaP, MCF7, and T47D). FOXA1 is a pioneer transcription factor in organogenesis and cancer progression. Genomewide mapping of FOXA1 by chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing annotates that target genes associated with FOXA1 binding are mostly common to these cancer cells. However, most of the functional FOXA1 target genes are specific to each cancer cell type. Further investigations using CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing technology indicate that cell-specific FOXA1 regulation is attributable to unique FOXA1 binding, genetic variations, and/or potential epigenetic regulation. Thus, FOXA1 controls the specificity of cancer cell types. We raise a “flower-blooming” hypothesis for cell-specific transcriptional regulation based on these observations.

scholarly journals The transcription factor GLI1 cooperates with the chromatin remodeler SMARCA2 to regulate chromatin accessibility at distal DNA regulatory elements

2020 ◽  
Vol 295 (26) ◽  
pp. 8725-8735
Author(s):  
Stephanie L. Safgren ◽  
Rachel L. O. Olson ◽  
Anne M. Vrabel ◽  
Luciana L. Almada ◽  
David L. Marks ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Transcriptional Activity ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Chromatin Accessibility ◽  
Micrococcal Nuclease ◽  
Gene Promoters ◽  
Interacting Protein ◽  
Transcriptional Activation Domain ◽  
Dna Regulatory Elements

The transcription factor GLI1 (GLI family zinc finger 1) plays a key role in the development and progression of multiple malignancies. To date, regulation of transcriptional activity at target gene promoters is the only molecular event known to underlie the oncogenic function of GLI1. Here, we provide evidence that GLI1 controls chromatin accessibility at distal regulatory regions by modulating the recruitment of SMARCA2 (SWI/SNF-related, matrix-associated, actin-dependent regulator of chromatin, subfamily A, member 2) to these elements. We demonstrate that SMARCA2 endogenously interacts with GLI1 and enhances its transcriptional activity. Mapping experiments indicated that the C-terminal transcriptional activation domain of GLI1 and SMARCA2's central domains, including its ATPase motif, are required for this interaction. Interestingly, similar to SMARCA2, GLI1 overexpression increased chromatin accessibility, as indicated by results of the micrococcal nuclease assay. Further, results of assays for transposase-accessible chromatin with sequencing (ATAC-seq) after GLI1 knockdown supported these findings, revealing that GLI1 regulates chromatin accessibility at several regions distal to gene promoters. Integrated RNA-seq and ATAC-seq data analyses identified a subset of differentially expressed genes located in cis to these regulated chromatin sites. Finally, using the GLI1-regulated gene HHIP (Hedgehog-interacting protein) as a model, we demonstrate that GLI1 and SMARCA2 co-occupy a distal chromatin peak and that SMARCA2 recruitment to this HHIP putative enhancer requires intact GLI1. These findings provide insights into how GLI1 controls gene expression in cancer cells and may inform approaches targeting this oncogenic transcription factor to manage malignancies.

scholarly journals Developmental and tissue-specific regulation of a novel transcription factor of the sea urchin.

1989 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
pp. 663-675 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Barberis ◽  
G Superti-Furga ◽  
L Vitelli ◽  
I Kemler ◽  
M Busslinger
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Sea Urchin ◽  
Tissue Specific ◽  
Specific Regulation

scholarly journals Tissue-Specific Regulation of Translational Readthrough Tunes Functions of the Traffic Jam Transcription Factor

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prajwal Karki ◽  
Travis D. Carney ◽  
Cristina Maracci ◽  
Andriy S. Yatsenko ◽  
Halyna R. Shcherbata ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Neural Cells ◽  
Tissue Specific ◽  
Traffic Jam ◽  
Translational Readthrough ◽  
The Central Nervous System ◽  
Gene Regulatory ◽  
Specific Regulation ◽  
Regulatory Functions

SummaryTranslational readthrough (TR) occurs when the ribosome decodes a stop codon as a sense codon, resulting in two protein isoforms synthesized from the same mRNA. TR is pervasive in eukaryotic organisms; however, its biological significance remains unclear. In this study, we quantify the TR potential of several candidate genes in Drosophila melanogaster and characterize the regulation of TR in the large Maf transcription factor Traffic jam (Tj). We used CRISPR/Cas9 generated mutant flies to show that the TR-generated Tj isoform is expressed in the nuclei of a subset of neural cells of the central nervous system and is excluded from the somatic cells of gonads, which express the short Tj isoform only. Translational control of TR is critical for preservation of neuronal integrity and maintenance of reproductive health. Fine-tuning of the gene regulatory functions of transcription factors by TR provides a new potential mechanism for cell-specific regulation of gene expression.HighlightsTj undergoes tissue-specific TR in neural cells of the central nervous system.Strict control of TR is crucial for neuroprotection and maintenance of reproductive capacity.TR selectively fine-tunes the gene regulatory functions of the transcription factor.TR in Tj links transcription and translation of tissue-specific control of gene expression.

scholarly journals Transcription factor activity rhythms and tissue-specific chromatin interactions explain circadian gene expression across organs

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jake Yeung ◽  
Jérôme Mermet ◽  
Céline Jouffe ◽  
Julien Marquis ◽  
Aline Charpagne ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Gene Networks ◽  
Integrated Analysis ◽  
Alternative Promoters ◽  
Enhancer Activity ◽  
Chromosome Conformation ◽  
Tissue Specific ◽  
Mouse Tissues ◽  
Liver And Kidney ◽  
Specific Regulation

AbstractTemporal control of physiology requires the interplay between gene networks involved in daily timekeeping and tissue function across different organs. How the circadian clock interweaves with tissue-specific transcriptional programs is poorly understood. Here we dissected temporal and tissue-specific regulation at multiple gene regulatory layers by examining mouse tissues with an intact or disrupted clock over time. Integrated analysis uncovered two distinct regulatory modes underlying tissue-specific rhythms: tissue-specific oscillations in transcription factor (TF) activity, which were linked to feeding-fasting cycles in liver and sodium homeostasis in kidney; and co-localized binding of clock and tissue-specific transcription factors at distal enhancers. Chromosome conformation capture (4C-Seq) in liver and kidney identified liver-specific chromatin loops that recruited clock-bound enhancers to promoters to regulate liver-specific transcriptional rhythms. Furthermore, this looping was remarkably promoter-specific on the scale of less than ten kilobases. Enhancers can contact a rhythmic promoter while looping out nearby nonrhythmic alternative promoters, confining rhythmic enhancer activity to specific promoters. These findings suggest that chromatin folding enables the clock to regulate rhythmic transcription of specific promoters to output temporal transcriptional programs tailored to different tissues.

scholarly journals Restriction of chromatin accessibility is necessary for appropriate enhancer expression

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel W. Hagey ◽  
Susanne Klum ◽  
Cecile Zaouter ◽  
Jonas Muhr
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Common Factor ◽  
Transcription Factor Binding ◽  
Chromatin Accessibility ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Reporter Expression ◽  
Enhancer Activity ◽  
Tissue Specific ◽  
Factor Binding

AbstractTissue specific gene expression underpins cell type diversity, and arises from the cooperative activities of transcription factors and the chromatin landscape. It has been previously demonstrated that enhancers with specific arrangements of transcription factor binding motifs can bring together commonly and specifically expressed factors in order to stabilize chromatin accessibility and drive spatially restricted reporter expression within different regions of the CNS. However, when reporters were used to analyse the activity of enhancers bound differentially by a common factor in the endoderm and CNS, several examples of non-tissue specific reporter expression were observed. In order to judge whether or not this may have been due to the unregulated chromatin environment of exogenously delivered enhancer reporters, here we have analysed the chromatin landscape of cells from the CNS and endodermal tissues and find that this reflects neighbouring gene expression to a greater degree than transcription factor binding. This work demonstrates that chromatin accessibility plays an essential role in defining enhancer activity in distantly related cell types.

scholarly journals HNF1alpha is involved in tissue-specific regulation of CFTR gene expression

2004 ◽  
Vol 378 (3) ◽  
pp. 909-918 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathalie MOUCHEL ◽  
Sytse A. HENSTRA ◽  
Victoria A. McCARTHY ◽  
Sarah H. WILLIAMS ◽  
Marios PHYLACTIDES ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Tissue Specificity ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Upstream Region ◽  
Mrna Levels ◽  
Tissue Specific ◽  
Specific Regulation

The CFTR (cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator) gene shows a complex pattern of expression with tissue-specific and temporal regulation. However, the genetic elements and transcription factors that control CFTR expression are largely unidentified. The CFTR promoter does not confer tissue specificity on gene expression, suggesting that there are regulatory elements outside the upstream region. Analysis of potential regulatory elements defined as DNase 1-hypersensitive sites within introns of the gene revealed multiple predicted binding sites for the HNF1α (hepatocyte nuclear factor 1α) transcription factor. HNF1α, which is expressed in many of the same epithelial cell types as CFTR and shows similar differentiation-dependent changes in gene expression, bound to these sites in vitro. Overexpression of heterologous HNF1α augmented CFTR transcription in vivo. In contrast, antisense inhibition of HNF1α transcription decreased the CFTR mRNA levels. Hnf1α knockout mice showed lower levels of CFTR mRNA in their small intestine in comparison with wild-type mice. This is the first report of a transcription factor, which confers tissue specificity on the expression of this important disease-associated gene.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document