scholarly journals Oncolytic Adenovirus: Prospects for Cancer Immunotherapy

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yaqi Zhao ◽  
Zheming Liu ◽  
Lan Li ◽  
Jie Wu ◽  
Huibo Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Response ◽  
Cancer Immunotherapy ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Oncolytic Adenovirus ◽  
Oncolytic Viruses ◽  
Engineering Technology ◽  
Antiviral Immune Response ◽  
Oncolytic Adenoviruses ◽  
Genetic Engineering Technology ◽  
Oncologic Treatment

Immunotherapy has moved to the forefront of modern oncologic treatment in the past few decades. Various forms of immunotherapy currently are emerging, including oncolytic viruses. In this therapy, viruses are engineered to selectively propagate in tumor cells and reduce toxicity for non-neoplastic tissues. Adenovirus is one of the most frequently employed oncolytic viruses because of its capacity in tumor cell lysis and immune response stimulation. Upregulation of immunostimulatory signals induced by oncolytic adenoviruses (OAds) might significantly remove local immune suppression and amplify antitumor immune responses. Existing genetic engineering technology allows us to design OAds with increasingly better tumor tropism, selectivity, and antitumor efficacy. Several promising strategies to modify the genome of OAds have been applied: capsid modifications, small deletions in the pivotal viral genes, insertion of tumor-specific promoters, and addition of immunostimulatory transgenes. OAds armed with tumor-associated antigen (TAA) transgenes as cancer vaccines provide additional therapeutic strategies to trigger tumor-specific immunity. Furthermore, the combination of OAds and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) increases clinical benefit as evidence shown in completed and ongoing clinical trials, especially in the combination of OAds with antiprogrammed death 1/programed death ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) therapy. Despite remarkable antitumor potency, oncolytic adenovirus immunotherapy is confronted with tough challenges such as antiviral immune response and obstruction of tumor microenvironment (TME). In this review, we focus on genomic modification strategies of oncolytic adenoviruses and applications of OAds in cancer immunotherapy.

scholarly journals The Mechanism of Stimulating and Mobilizing the Immune System Enhancing the Anti-Tumor Immunity

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhengguo Wu ◽  
Shang Li ◽  
Xiao Zhu
Keyword(s):  
Immune Response ◽  
Immune System ◽  
Tumor Microenvironment ◽  
Cancer Immunotherapy ◽  
Tumor Immunity ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
The Body ◽  
Research Progress ◽  
Effective Population ◽  
Cell Components

Cancer immunotherapy is a kind of therapy that can control and eliminate tumors by restarting and maintaining the tumor-immune cycle and restoring the body’s normal anti-tumor immune response. Although immunotherapy has great potential, it is currently only applicable to patients with certain types of tumors, such as melanoma, lung cancer, and cancer with high mutation load and microsatellite instability, and even in these types of tumors, immunotherapy is not effective for all patients. In order to enhance the effectiveness of tumor immunotherapy, this article reviews the research progress of tumor microenvironment immunotherapy, and studies the mechanism of stimulating and mobilizing immune system to enhance anti-tumor immunity. In this review, we focused on immunotherapy against tumor microenvironment (TME) and discussed the important research progress. TME is the environment for the survival and development of tumor cells, which is composed of cell components and non-cell components; immunotherapy for TME by stimulating or mobilizing the immune system of the body, enhancing the anti-tumor immunity. The checkpoint inhibitors can effectively block the inhibitory immunoregulation, indirectly strengthen the anti-tumor immune response and improve the effect of immunotherapy. We also found the checkpoint inhibitors have brought great changes to the treatment model of advanced tumors, but the clinical treatment results show great individual differences. Based on the close attention to the future development trend of immunotherapy, this study summarized the latest progress of immunotherapy and pointed out a new direction. To study the mechanism of stimulating and mobilizing the immune system to enhance anti-tumor immunity can provide new opportunities for cancer treatment, expand the clinical application scope and effective population of cancer immunotherapy, and improve the survival rate of cancer patients.

scholarly journals Infections due to dysregulated immunity: an emerging complication of cancer immunotherapy

Thorax ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. thoraxjnl-2021-217260
Author(s):  
Tommaso Morelli ◽  
Kohei Fujita ◽  
Gil Redelman-Sidi ◽  
Paul T Elkington
Keyword(s):  
Immune Response ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Cancer Immunotherapy ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Immunosuppressive Treatment ◽  
Common Side Effect ◽  
Inflammatory Immune Response ◽  
New Framework

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionised cancer treatment. However, immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are a common side effect which can mimic infection. Additionally, treatment of irAEs with corticosteroids and other immunosuppressant agents can lead to opportunistic infection, which we have classed as immunotherapy infections due to immunosuppression. However, emerging reports demonstrate that some infections can be precipitated by ICIs in the absence of immunosuppressive treatment, in contrast to the majority of reported cases. These infections are characterised by a dysregulated inflammatory immune response, and so we propose they are described as immunotherapy infections due to dysregulated immunity. This review summarises the rapidly emerging evidence of these phenomena and proposes a new framework for considering infection in the context of cancer immunotherapy.

scholarly journals Intratumoural immunotherapies for unresectable and metastatic melanoma: current status and future perspectives

2020 ◽  
Vol 123 (6) ◽  
pp. 885-897
Author(s):  
Mark R. Middleton ◽  
Christoph Hoeller ◽  
Olivier Michielin ◽  
Caroline Robert ◽  
Caroline Caramella ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Response ◽  
Metastatic Melanoma ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Unmet Need ◽  
Systemic Exposure ◽  
Oncolytic Viruses ◽  
Current Status ◽  
Local Concentration ◽  
Major Step

Abstract The emergence of human intratumoural immunotherapy (HIT-IT) is a major step forward in the management of unresectable melanoma. The direct injection of treatments into melanoma lesions can cause cell lysis and induce a local immune response, and might be associated with a systemic immune response. Directly injecting immunotherapies into tumours achieves a high local concentration of immunostimulatory agent while minimising systemic exposure and, as such, HIT-IT agents are associated with lower toxicity than systemic immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs), enabling their potential use in combination with other therapies. Consequently, multiple HIT-IT agents, including oncolytic viruses, pattern-recognition receptor agonists, injected CPIs, cytokines and immune glycolipids, are under investigation. This review considers the current clinical development status of HIT-IT agents as monotherapy and in combination with systemic CPIs, and the practical aspects of administering and assessing the response to these agents. The future of HIT-IT probably lies in its use in combination with systemic CPIs; data from Phase 2 trials indicate a synergy between HIT-IT and CPIs. Data also suggest that the addition of HIT-IT to a CPI might generate responses in CPI-refractory tumours, thereby overcoming resistance and addressing a current unmet need in unresectable and metastatic melanoma for treatment options following progression after CPI treatment.

scholarly journals Perspective on a Modified Developmental and Reproductive Toxicity Testing Strategy for Cancer Immunotherapy

2016 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 263-273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rodney A. Prell ◽  
Wendy G. Halpern ◽  
Gautham K. Rao
Keyword(s):  
Immune Response ◽  
Cancer Immunotherapy ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Reproductive Toxicity ◽  
Toxicity Testing ◽  
Reproductive Risk ◽  
Cell Responses ◽  
Maternal Immune System ◽  
Cancer Immunotherapeutic ◽  
Different Strains

The intent of cancer immunotherapy (CIT) is to generate and enhance T-cell responses against tumors. The tumor microenvironment establishes several inhibitory pathways that lead to suppression of the local immune response, which is permissive for tumor growth. The efficacy of different CITs, alone and in combination, stems from reinvigorating the tumor immune response via several mechanisms, including costimulatory agonists, checkpoint inhibitors, and vaccines. However, immune responses to other antigens (self and foreign) may also be enhanced, resulting in potentially undesired effects. In outbred mammalian pregnancies, the fetus expresses paternally derived alloantigens that are recognized as foreign by the maternal immune system. If unchecked or enhanced, maternal immunity to these alloantigens represents a developmental and reproductive risk and thus is a general liability for cancer immunotherapeutic molecules. We propose a tiered approach to confirm this mechanistic reproductive liability for CIT molecules. A rodent allopregnancy model is based on breeding 2 different strains of mice so that paternally derived alloantigens are expressed by the fetus. When tested with a cross-reactive biotherapeutic, small molecule drug, or surrogate molecule, this model should reveal on-target reproductive liabilities if the pathway is involved in maintaining pregnancy. Alternatively, allopregnancy models with genetically modified mice can be interrogated for exquisitely specific biotherapeutics with restricted species reactivity. The allopregnancy model represents a relatively straightforward approach to confirm an expected on-target reproductive risk for CIT molecules. For biotherapeutics, it could potentially replace more complex developmental and reproductive toxicity testing in nonhuman primates when a pregnancy hazard is confirmed or expected.

Surface engineering of oncolytic adenovirus for combinations of immune checkpoint blockade and virotherapy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peng Lv ◽  
Xiaomei Chen ◽  
Shiying Fu ◽  
En Ren ◽  
Chao Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Treatment ◽  
Cancer Immunotherapy ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Surface Engineering ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Blockade ◽  
Oncolytic Adenovirus ◽  
Checkpoint Blockade

Advances in the development of modern cancer immunotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors have dramatically changed the landscape of cancer treatment. However, most cancer patients are refractory to immune checkpoint inhibitors...

An innovative combined immunization platform for personalized cancer immunotherapy.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14225-e14225
Author(s):  
Jessica Matta ◽  
Célia Matta ◽  
Emilie Thiebault Peter ◽  
David Moulaert ◽  
Robert Drillien ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Response ◽  
Cancer Immunotherapy ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Blockade ◽  
Vector Coding ◽  
Melanoma Model ◽  
Dna Vector ◽  
Personalized Cancer

e14225 Background: Activity of immune checkpoint inhibitors relies mainly on the presence of an immune response directed against neoantigens resulting from tumor specific mutations. The induction and/or amplification of such an immune response is expected to increase the activity of these therapies. We describe here a novel immunization platform developed for the purpose of personalized cancer immunotherapy. This platform integrates a DNA vector coding for neoantigens, a live modified vaccinia of strain Ankara (MVA) used as a physiologic adjuvant and anti-CTLA-4 as a locally acting early immune checkpoint blocker. Methods: Immune potency was assessed in C57BL6 mice injected subcutaneously three times five days apart with an ovalbumine (OVA) expressing DNA vector (100 µg), either alone or in combination with increasing doses of MVA (up to 2.5x107 plaque forming units, pfu) and increasing doses of anti-CTLA-4 (up to 100 µg). OVA specific immune responses were measured by ELISpot. Anti-tumor efficacy was then investigated with a similar administration scheme in a therapeutic B16F10 mice melanoma model with a DNA vector coding for the B16F10-M30 tumor neoantigen. Results: At an optimal dose of 2.5x106 pfu, MVA significantly improved OVA specific immune response up to 10 times higher as compared to vector alone. Addition of CTLA-4 blockade further increased the magnitude of response, up to 30 times higher than with vector alone. Both MVA and CTLA-4 demonstrated a bell-shaped dose dependent effect. In tumor-bearing animals, 80% experienced durable tumor-free survival when treated with the combination therapy as compared to less than 20% in untreated animals or animals treated with each component independently. Treatment appeared feasible and well-tolerated. Conclusions: Neoantigen coding DNA vector, MVA and CTLA-4 immune checkpoint blockade, when co-administered in immunocompetent C57BL6 mice, acted synergistically to induce a cellular immune response. The same approach translated into a strong anti-tumoral response in an aggressive melanoma model. This combined immunization platform appears as a potential novel way to enhance clinical benefit from current immune checkpoint inhibitors.

scholarly journals Optimization of Early Steps in Oncolytic Adenovirus ONCOS-401 Production in T-175 and HYPERFlasks

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 621 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lukasz Kuryk ◽  
Anne-Sophie Møller ◽  
Antti Vuolanto ◽  
Sari Pesonen ◽  
Mariangela Garofalo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Scale Up ◽  
A549 Cells ◽  
Oncolytic Adenovirus ◽  
Oncolytic Viruses ◽  
Oncolytic Adenoviruses ◽  
Combination Strategies ◽  
Viral Particles ◽  
Advanced Therapy ◽  
Viral Yield ◽  
Harvesting Method

Oncolytic adenoviruses can trigger lysis of tumor cells, induce an antitumor immune response, bypass classical chemotherapeutic resistance strategies of tumors, and provide opportunities for combination strategies. A major challenge is the development of scalable production methods for viral seed stocks and sufficient quantities of clinical grade viruses. Because of promising clinical signals in a compassionate use program (Advanced Therapy Access Program) which supported further development, we chose the oncolytic adenovirus ONCOS-401 as a testbed for a new approach to scale up. We found that the best viral production conditions in both T-175 flasks and HYPERFlasks included A549 cells grown to 220,000 cells/cm2 (80% confluency), with ONCOS-401 infection at 30 multiplicity of infection (MOI), and an incubation period of 66 h. The Lysis A harvesting method with benzonase provided the highest viral yield from both T-175 and HYPERFlasks (10,887 ± 100 and 14,559 ± 802 infectious viral particles/cell, respectively). T-175 flasks and HYPERFlasks produced up to 2.1 × 109 ± 0.2 and 1.75 × 109 ± 0.08 infectious particles of ONCOS-401 per cm2 of surface area, respectively. Our findings suggest a suitable stepwise process that can be applied to optimizing the initial production of other oncolytic viruses.

scholarly journals Cytokine-Coding Oncolytic Adenovirus TILT-123 Is Safe, Selective, and Effective as a Single Agent and in Combination with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Anti-PD-1

Cells ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 246
Author(s):  
Riikka Havunen ◽  
Riikka Kalliokoski ◽  
Mikko Siurala ◽  
Suvi Sorsa ◽  
João M. Santos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽  
Immune Cell ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Interleukin 2 ◽  
Oncolytic Adenovirus ◽  
Oncolytic Viruses

Oncolytic viruses provide a biologically multi-faceted treatment option for patients who cannot be cured with currently available treatment options. We constructed an oncolytic adenovirus, TILT-123, to support T-cell therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors in solid tumors. Adenoviruses are immunogenic by nature, are easy to produce in large quantities, and can carry relatively large transgenes. They are the most commonly used gene therapy vectors and are well tolerated in patients. TILT-123 expresses two potent cytokines, tumor necrosis factor alpha and interleukin-2, to stimulate especially the T-cell compartment in the tumor microenvironment. Before entering clinical studies, the safety and biodistribution of TILT-123 was studied in Syrian hamsters and in mice. The results show that TILT-123 is safe in animals as monotherapy and in combination with an immune checkpoint inhibitor anti-PD-1. The virus treatment induces acute changes in circulating immune cell compartments, but the levels return to normal by the middle of the treatment period. The virus is rapidly cleared from healthy tissues, and it does not cause damage to vital organs. The results support the initiation of a phase 1 dose-escalation trial, where melanoma patients receiving a tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte therapy are treated with TILT-123 (NCT04217473).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document