scholarly journals Polymorphisms in Genes Encoding Glutathione Transferase Pi and Glutathione Transferase Omega Influence Prostate Cancer Risk and Prognosis

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Veljko Santric ◽  
Dejan Dragicevic ◽  
Marija Matic ◽  
Milica Djokic ◽  
Marija Pljesa-Ercegovac ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Glutathione Transferase ◽  
Redox Homeostasis ◽  
Prostate Cancer Risk ◽  
Gst Polymorphisms ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Genes Encoding ◽  
Gst Polymorphism ◽  
First Time

Considering the pleiotropic roles of glutathione transferase (GST) omega class members in redox homeostasis, we hypothesized that polymorphisms in GSTO1 and GSTO2 might contribute to prostate cancer (PC) development and progression. Therefore, we performed a comprehensive analysis of GSTO1 and GSTO2 SNPs’ role in susceptibility to PC, as well as whether they might serve as prognostic biomarkers independently or in conjunction with other common GST polymorphisms (GSTM1, GSTT1, and GSTP1). Genotyping was performed in 237 PC cases and 236 age-matched controls by multiplex PCR for deletion of GST polymorphisms and quantitative PCR for SNPs. The results of this study, for the first time, demonstrated that homozygous carriers of both GSTO1*A/A and GSTO2*G/G variant genotypes are at increased risk of PC. This was further confirmed by haplotype analysis, which showed that H2 comprising both GSTO1*A and GSTO2*G variant alleles represented a high-risk combination. However, the prognostic relevance of polymorphisms in GST omega genes was not found in our cohort of PC patients. Analysis of the role of other investigated GST polymorphisms (GSTM1, GSTT1, and GSTP1) in terms of PC prognosis has shown shorter survival in carriers of GSTP1*T/T (rs1138272) genotype than in those carrying at least one referent allele. In addition, the presence of GSTP1*T/T genotype independently predicted a four-fold higher risk of overall mortality among PC patients. This study demonstrated a significant prognostic role of GST polymorphism in PC.

scholarly journals GSTP1 rs1138272 Polymorphism Affects Prostate Cancer Risk

Medicina ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. 128
Author(s):  
Veljko Santric ◽  
Milica Djokic ◽  
Sonja Suvakov ◽  
Marija Pljesa-Ercegovac ◽  
Marina Nikitovic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Glutathione Transferase ◽  
Prostate Cancer Risk ◽  
Fold Increase ◽  
Genetic Alterations ◽  
Aberrant Methylation ◽  
Gst Polymorphisms ◽  
Risk Alleles ◽  
Variant Alleles

Background and Objectives: One of the most frequent genetic alterations reported to date in prostate cancer (PC) is aberrant methylation of glutathione transferase P1 (GSTP1). Taking into consideration the involvement of oxidative stress in PC pathogenesis and recent advances in scientific understanding of the role of GSTP1*Ala114Val rs1138272 polymorphism in carcinogenesis, we hypothesized that this single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) influences the risk of PC independently of, or in combination with, other GST polymorphisms, including GSTP1*IIe105Val rs1695 or GSTM1 and GSTT1 deletion polymorphisms. Materials and Methods: Genotyping was performed in 237 PC cases and in 236 age-matched controls by multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for deletion of GST polymorphisms and by quantitative PCR for SNPs. Results: We found that carriers of either GSTP1*Val (rs1138272) or GSTP1*Val (rs1695) variant alleles had a PC risk compared to individuals with both referent alleles (OR = 4.93, 95%CI: 2.89–8.40, p < 0.001 and OR = 1.8, 95%CI: 1.19–2.73, p = 0.006, respectively). Additionally, in a haplotype analysis we found that individuals with GSTP1*C haplotype, represented by both variant alleles (GSTP1*Val rs1695 + GSTP1*Val rs1138272), had a 5.46 times higher risk of PC development compared to individuals with the most frequent haplotype (95%CI = 2.56–11.65, p < 0.001), suggesting a potential role of those variants in PC susceptibility. A regression analysis on the number of risk-associated alleles per individual (GSTM1*active, GSTT1*null, GSTP1*Val rs1695 and GSTP1*Val rs1138272) showed a significant increase in the risk of developing PC, from 3.65-fold in carriers of two risk alleles (95%CI = 1.55–8.61, p = 0.003) to an approximately 12-fold increase in carriers of all four risk alleles (95%CI = 3.05–44.93, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Prostate cancer may be influenced by multiple glutathione transferase (GST) polymorphic genes, especially GSTP1, highlighting the role of gene–gene interactions in human susceptibility to this cancer.

scholarly journals CHEK2∗1100delC Mutation and Risk of Prostate Cancer

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victoria Hale ◽  
Maren Weischer ◽  
Jong Y. Park
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Prostate Cancer Screening ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Prostate Cancer Risk ◽  
Conclusive Evidence ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
History Of ◽  
Cancer Studies

Although the causes of prostate cancer are largely unknown, previous studies support the role of genetic factors in the development of prostate cancer.CHEK2plays a critical role in DNA replication by responding to double-stranded breaks. In this review, we provide an overview of the current knowledge of the role of a genetic variant, 1100delC, ofCHEK2on prostate cancer risk and discuss the implication for potential translation of this knowledge into clinical practice. Currently, twelve articles that discussedCHEK2∗1100delC and its association with prostate cancer were identified. Of the twelve prostate cancer studies, five studies had independent data to draw conclusive evidence from. The pooled results of OR and 95% CI were 1.98 (1.23–3.18) for unselected cases and 3.39 (1.78–6.47) for familial cases, indicating thatCHEK2∗1100delC mutation is associated with increased risk of prostate cancer. Screening for CHEK2∗1100delC should be considered in men with a familial history of prostate cancer.

Profile study: Genetic prostate cancer risk stratification for targeted screening.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5054-5054
Author(s):  
Elena Castro ◽  
Elizabeth Bancroft ◽  
Natalie Taylor ◽  
Tokhir Dadaev ◽  
Elizabeth Page ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Genetic Model ◽  
Genetic Risk Score ◽  
Prostate Cancer Risk ◽  
Screening Tools ◽  
Risk Scores ◽  
Severe Side Effect ◽  
Cancer Worry ◽  
Increased Risk

5054 Background: Prostate cancer (PC) screening is controversial and better approaches are needed, including a better assessment of individualized PC risk. Several studies have identified a number of common single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that confer a cumulative risk of PC. We have explored the potential role of genetic markers in identifying men who should be selectively targeted for screening in a population with increased risk of PC due to family history (FH) of the disease. Methods: PROFILE has been developed as a pilot study. The primary aim is to determine the feasibility of targeted PC screening using prostatic biopsy (PB) and its association with specific genetic profiles in men with FH. Secondary aims are to evaluate the role of PSA and Diffusion Weighted MRI (DW-MRI) as screening tools in this population. From December 2010 men aged 40-69 with FH of PC were invited into the study until 100 men were enrolled. Blood samples were provided for PSA and DNA extraction. The cumulative SNP risk scores for each patient were calculated by summing 59 risk alleles for each locus using the weighted effect as estimated in previous studies (log-additive model). DW-MRI was performed in 50 patients. All participants were asked to undergo a 10 core PB regardless of baseline PSA. Those who declined PB have been excluded from this analysis. Data on side effects and cancer worry were also collected. Results: 35% of invited men entered the study. Median age was 53 yrs (40-69) and median PSA was 1.15. Ninety men accepted to undergo a PB as primary PC screening. Twenty-two tumours were found and 45% of them were clinically significant [Median age 64yrs (47-69), median PSA 5.4 (0.91-9.3)]. The predictive performance of DW-MRI, PSA, genetic model and genetic model plus PSA measured by AUC were: 0.85, 0.73, 0.57 and 0.74, respectively. The genetic model performed better in men with PSA<3(AUC 0.63). No severe side effect or adverse psychosocial variables were noted. Conclusions: Our results indicate that PB is acceptable as a means of PC screening in men with FH of PC. Overall, DW-MRI and PSA were more predictive of PC than the genetic risk score. As more SNPs are found, a larger study is warranted to evaluate their role in the PC screening algorithm.

Germline heterozygous BLM mutations and prostate cancer risk.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 321-321
Author(s):  
Elisa Ledet ◽  
Emmanuel S. Antonarakis ◽  
Colin Pritchard ◽  
William B. Isaacs ◽  
A. Oliver Sartor
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Dna Sequencing ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Genetic Disorder ◽  
Prostate Cancer Risk ◽  
Dna Helicase ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Increased Risk

321 Background: The BLM gene encodes a RecQ DNA helicase that is involved in homologous recombination. Biallelic BLM inactivation leads to Bloom syndrome, an inherited genetic disorder marked by chromosomal instability and multiple cancer susceptibilities. Conflicting studies have suggested that heterozygous BLM mutation carriers may have an increased risk of various cancers. Here we explored the role of germline pathogenic BLM mutations in prostate cancer. Methods: Prostate cancer patients with heterozygous BLM mutations were assembled from Tulane Cancer Center (TCC), Johns Hopkins Hospital (JHH) and University of Washington (UW). BLM germline mutations were identified either through commercial germline testing (Invitae), the UW-BROCA panel, or whole-exome sequencing. Corresponding tumor tissue was analyzed by DNA sequencing for somatic alterations. Population level control data were obtained from the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). Results: 6 BLM germline carriers were identified among 985 advanced prostate cancer case; 2/295 TCC patients, 2/172 JHH patients, and 2/518 UW patients. Overall, pathogenic BLM mutations were detected in 0.609% (6/985) of prostate cancer cases. All mutations were loss-of-function truncating lesions (splicing or nonsense alterations). No Ashkenazi BLM mutations were observed. The population frequency of pathogenic or likely pathogenic BLM alterations detected in gnomAD was 0.025% (31/124,589). Compared to gnomAD controls, the relative risk of BLM mutations in prostate cancer patients was 24.3 (95% CI 10.2 to 58.2; P < 0.0001). One family had a pathogenic splice variant in BLM that cosegregated with disease in three of three cases with lethal/high risk prostate cancer. Tumor DNA sequencing was possible in 5 of 6 BLM carriers; no case demonstrated LOH or additional somatic BLM mutations. Interestingly, 2/5 cases on tumor sequencing also had bi-allelic BRCA2 inactivation. Conclusions: Germline BLM mutations may play a role in prostate cancer risk. Given the role of BLM in chromosomal stability and evidence of concurrent BRCA2 inactivation in a subset of cases, larger cohorts and functional analyses will be critical for better understanding the role of BLM in prostate cancer.

The PROFILE feasibility study: Genetic prostate cancer risk stratification for targeted screening.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 22-22
Author(s):  
Christos Mikropoulos ◽  
Elena Castro ◽  
Elizabeth Bancroft ◽  
Elizabeth Page ◽  
Natalie Taylor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Genetic Model ◽  
Cumulative Risk ◽  
Prostate Cancer Risk ◽  
Screening Tools ◽  
Risk Scores ◽  
Prostatic Biopsy ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Targeted Screening

22 Background: Prostate cancer (PC) screening is controversial and a better assessment of individualized PC risk is needed. Several single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) conferring a cumulative risk of PC have been identified. We have explored the potential role of genetic markers for targeted screening in a population with increased risk of PC due to family history (FH). Methods: PROFILE was developed as a pilot study to determine the feasibility of targeted PC screening using prostatic biopsy (PB) and its association with specific genetic profiles in men with FH. We also evaluated the role of PSA and Diffusion Weighted MRI (DW-MRI) as screening tools. One hundred sixteen men age 40 to 69 with FH of PC were enrolled between October 2009 and December 2012. Cumulative SNP risk scores were calculated by summing 59 risk alleles for each locus using the weighted effect (log-additive model). DW-MRI was performed in 50 patients. Participants were asked to undergo a 10 core PB regardless of baseline PSA. Results: Median age 53 (40 to 69) and median PSA was 1.15. One hundred and two men accepted to undergo a PB as primary PC screening. Twenty-three tumours were found (22.5% of biopsies) as well as seven men diagnosed with atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP) (6.8%) and eight men with high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HG-PIN) (7.8%). In total 37.1% received an abnormal result. Out of the diagnosed PC 41% were intermediate or high risk and requiring treatment, which compares with 24% in general population screening. The predictive performance of DW-MRI, PSA, genetic model and genetic model plus PSA measured by AUC were: 0.85, 0.73, 0.57 and 0.74, respectively. The genetic model performed best in men with a normal PSA of <3(AUC 0.63). Analyses of a 78 SNP profile from the recent COGS results are underway. Conclusions: Ourresults indicate that PB is acceptable for PC screening in men with FH of PC. The significant AUC for DW-MRI would warrant a larger study. The incidence of ASAP is higher in this group than the general population.The SNP risk score was more predictive in men with PSA less than three where PB would not normally be undertaken, therefore an expanded study to investigate the role of genetic profiling in directing PB in PC screening is indicated.

scholarly journals Compensation of Mutation in Arabidopsis glutathione transferase (AtGSTU) Genes under Control or Salt Stress Conditions

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (7) ◽  
pp. 2349 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edit Horváth ◽  
Krisztina Bela ◽  
Ágnes Gallé ◽  
Riyazuddin Riyazuddin ◽  
Gábor Csomor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Salt Stress ◽  
Glutathione Transferase ◽  
Redox Homeostasis ◽  
Redox Status ◽  
Glutathione Transferases ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
General Role ◽  
First Time ◽  
Gst Activity

Glutathione transferases (GSTs) play a crucial role in detoxification processes due to the fact of their glutathione (GSH) conjugating activity, and through glutathione peroxidase or dehydroascorbate reductase (DHAR) activities, they influence the redox state of GSH and ascorbate (AsA). The plant-specific tau (GSTU) group is the largest class of Arabidopsis GSTs, and their members are involved in responses to different abiotic stresses. We investigated the effect of salt stress on two-week-old Arabidopsis thaliana wild-type (Col-0), Atgstu19 and Atgstu24 mutant plants after applying 150 mM NaCl for two days. The Atgstu19 seedlings had lower GST activity and vitality both under control conditions and after salt stress than the wild-type, but the level of total ROS was similar to the Col-0 plants. The GST activity of the knockout Atgstu24 mutant was even higher under control conditions compared to the Col-0 plants, while the ROS level and its vitality did not differ significantly from the wild-type. Analysis of the AtGSTU expression pattern revealed that the mutation in a single AtGSTU gene was accompanied by the up- and downregulation of several other AtGSTUs. Moreover, elevated AsA and GSH levels, an altered GSH redox potential and increased DHAR and glutathione reductase activities could help to compensate for the mutation of AtGSTU genes. The observed changes in the mutants suggest that the investigated isoenzymes influence the redox homeostasis under control conditions and after NaCl treatment in Arabidopsis seedlings. These data indicate for the first time the more general role of a temporary shift of redox status as part of GST mechanisms and regulation.

scholarly journals Social Jetlag and Prostate Cancer Incidence in Alberta’s Tomorrow Project: A Prospective Cohort Study

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. 3873
Author(s):  
Liang Hu ◽  
Andrew Harper ◽  
Emily Heer ◽  
Jessica McNeil ◽  
Chao Cao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Cancer Incidence ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Prospective Cohort ◽  
Prostate Cancer Risk ◽  
Absolute Difference ◽  
Prostate Cancer Incidence ◽  
Social Jetlag ◽  
Increased Risk

We investigated the association of social jetlag (misalignment between the internal clock and socially required timing of activities) and prostate cancer incidence in a prospective cohort in Alberta, Canada. Data were collected from 7455 cancer-free men aged 35–69 years enrolled in Alberta’s Tomorrow Project (ATP) from 2001–2007. In the 2008 survey, participants reported usual bed- and wake-times on weekdays and weekend days. Social jetlag was defined as the absolute difference in waking time between weekday and weekend days, and was categorized into three groups: 0–<1 h (from 0 to anything smaller than 1), 1–<2 h (from 1 to anything smaller than 2), and 2+ h. ATP facilitated data linkage with the Alberta Cancer Registry in June 2018 to determine incident prostate cancer cases (n = 250). Hazard ratios (HR) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards regressions, adjusting for a range of covariates. Median follow-up was 9.57 years, yielding 68,499 person-years. Baseline presence of social jetlag of 1–<2 h (HR = 1.52, 95% CI: 1.10 to 2.01), and 2+ hours (HR = 1.69, 95% CI: 1.15 to 2.46) were associated with increased prostate cancer risk vs. those reporting no social jetlag (p for trend = 0.004). These associations remained after adjusting for sleep duration (p for trend = 0.006). With respect to chronotype, the association between social jetlag and prostate cancer risk remained significant in men with early chronotypes (p for trend = 0.003) but attenuated to null in men with intermediate (p for trend = 0.150) or late chronotype (p for trend = 0.381). Our findings suggest that greater than one hour of habitual social jetlag is associated with an increased risk of prostate cancer. Longitudinal studies with repeated measures of social jetlag and large samples with sufficient advanced prostate cancer cases are needed to confirm these findings.

scholarly journals Association of CYP1A1, GSTM1 and GSTT1 gene polymorphisms with risk of prostate cancer in Algerian population

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Somia Medjani ◽  
Djalila Chellat-Rezgoune ◽  
Taher Kezai ◽  
Mohammed Chidekh ◽  
Noureddine Abadi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cancer Susceptibility ◽  
Prostate Cancer Risk ◽  
Detoxification Enzymes ◽  
Current Case ◽  
Algerian Population ◽  
Pcr Rflp ◽  
Genes Encoding ◽  
Genetic And Environmental Factors ◽  
Metabolism Of Xenobiotics

Abstract Background Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in the world, and its etiology involves the interaction of genetic and environmental factors. Interindividual differences observed in the metabolism of xenobiotics may be due to polymorphisms of genes encoding the detoxification enzymes. This genetic variability seems to be associated with differences in susceptibility to certain types of cancers, including prostate cancer. Our study has been made in order to investigate a possible genetic predisposition to prostate cancer in an Algerian population, through the analysis of genetic polymorphisms of three enzymes metabolizing xenobiotics namely cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A1, glutathione S-transferase mu 1 (GSTM1) and GST theta 1 (GSTT1). Methods The current case–control study included 101 prostate cancer patients and 101 healthy controls. Genotyping of CYP1A1 T3801C polymorphisms and GSTM1/GSTT-null was made, respectively, by PCR-RFLP and multiplex PCR. Results No significantly positive associations were found for the CYP1A1 T3801C [p = 0.71, OR = 1.23 (0.56–2.72)] and GSTM1-null [p = 0.26, OR = 1.37 (0.76–2.4)] polymorphisms and prostate cancer susceptibility. However, we detect a highly significant association between GSTT1-null genotype [p = 0.03, OR = 2.03 (1.06–3.99)], GSTM1/GSTT1-double null genotype [p = 0.027, OR = 2.6; CI (1.07–6.5)] and prostate cancer risk. Furthermore, no statistically significant differences between the studied polymorphisms and tumor parameters (the Gleason score and clinical stages of aggressiveness) at diagnosis of PCa. Conclusions The risk of developing prostate cancer in Algeria does not appear to be associated with CYP1A1 T3801C genotypes and GSTM1-null, but GSTT1-null and GSTM1/GSTT1-double null genotypes increased the risk of prostate cancer.

scholarly journals WNT3A rs752107(C > T) Polymorphism Is Associated With an Increased Risk of Essential Hypertension and Related Cardiovascular Diseases

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huan Ren ◽  
Jian-Quan Luo ◽  
Fan Ouyang ◽  
Li Cheng ◽  
Xiao-Ping Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Essential Hypertension ◽  
Signaling Pathway ◽  
Genetic Variant ◽  
Eqtl Analysis ◽  
Cardiovascular Development ◽  
Genomic Variants ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
First Time

Essential Hypertension (EH) results in the burden of cardiovascular disease (CVD) such as Heart Failure (HF) and Ischemic Stroke (IS). A rapidly emerging field involving the role of Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in cardiovascular development and dysfunction has recently drawn extensive attention. In the present study, we conducted a genetic association between genomic variants in Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway and EH, HF, IS. A total of 95 SNPs in 12 Wnt signaling genes (WNT3A, WNT3, WNT4, DKK1, DKK2, LRP5, LRP6, CTNNB1, APC, FZD1, FRZB, SFRP1) were genotyped in 1,860 participants (440 patients with EH, 535 patients with HF, 421 patients with IS and 464 normal control subjects) using Sequenom MassArray technology. WNT3A rs752107(C &gt; T) was strongly associated with an increased risk of EH, HF and IS. Compared with WNT3A rs752107 CC genotype, the CT genotype carriers had a 48% increased risk of EH (OR = 1.48, 95% CI = 1.12–1.96, P = 0.006), the TT genotype conferred a 139% increased risk of EH (OR = 2.39, 95% CI = 1.32–4.34, P = 0.003). Regarding HF and IS, the risk of HF in the T allele carriers (CT + TT) was nearly increased by 58% (OR = 1.58, 95% CI = 1.22–2.04, P = 4.40 × 10−4) and the risk of IS was increased by 37% (OR = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.04–1.79, P = 0.025). Expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) analysis indicated that rs752107 C allele corresponded to a significant reduction of WNT3A expression. We described a genetic variant of WNT3A rs752107 in Wnt/β-catenin signaling strongly associated with the risk of EH, HF and IS for the first time.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document