scholarly journals Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin in Vindesine-Based and Bortezomib-Based Regimens for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: A Retrospective Study of Efficacy and Safety

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yujia Zhai ◽  
Dai Yuan ◽  
Xueling Ge ◽  
Shunfeng Hu ◽  
Peipei Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Complete Response Rate ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Good Partial Response

PurposeAlthough pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) has been approved in combination with bortezomib for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM), the antitumor efficacy and tolerability of PLD in different regimens for patients with newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) have not been fully defined.MethodsA total of 249 NDMM patients diagnosed between January 2008 and October 2019 were included in this retrospective study. Among them, 112 patients received vindesine-based chemotherapy (35 vDD and 77 vAD) and 137 received bortezomib-based chemotherapy (58 VDD and 79 VD).ResultsIn bortezomib-containing regimens, the complete response rate (48.3 vs. 30.4%, p = 0.033) and very good partial response or better rate (74.1 vs. 57.0%, p = 0.038) of VDD were significantly higher than those of VD subgroup. While no superior survival was found between VDD and VD subgroup. In vindesine-containing regimens, no statistical significance was identified between vDD and vAD in terms of response rate and survival. The occurrence rates of all cardiac AEs were similar between VDD and VD.ConclusionsThe vDD regimen was similar with vAD in the aspect of response rate, survival, and toxicity in NDMM patients. The addition of PLD to VD brought deeper response without increased toxicity, while no superior survival was found.

scholarly journals Lenalidomide, bortezomib, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, and dexamethasone in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a phase 1/2 Multiple Myeloma Research Consortium trial

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (3) ◽  
pp. 535-543 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrzej J. Jakubowiak ◽  
Kent A. Griffith ◽  
Donna E. Reece ◽  
Craig C. Hofmeister ◽  
Sagar Lonial ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Sensory Neuropathy ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Newly Diagnosed

Abstract This phase 1/2 trial evaluated combination lenalidomide, bortezomib, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, and dexamethasone (RVDD) in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) patients. Patients received RVDD at 4 dose levels, including the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Patients with a very good partial response or better (≥ VGPR) after cycle 4 proceeded to autologous stem cell transplantation or continued treatment. The primary objectives were MTD evaluation and response to RVDD after 4 and 8 cycles. Seventy-two patients received a median of 4.5 cycles. The MTDs were lenalidomide 25 mg, bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 30 mg/m2, and dexamethasone 20/10 mg, as established with 3-week cycles. The most common adverse events were fatigue, constipation, sensory neuropathy, and infection; there was no treatment-related mortality. Response rates after 4 and 8 cycles were 96% and 95% partial response or better, 57% and 65% ≥ VGPR, and 29% and 35% complete or near-complete response, respectively. After a median follow-up of 15.5 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were not reached. The estimated 18-month PFS and OS were 80.8% and 98.6%, respectively. RVDD was generally well tolerated and highly active, warranting further study in newly diagnosed MM patients. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00724568.

scholarly journals Psychiatrists' appreciation of statistical v. clinical significance: a quick test

2009 ◽  
Vol 33 (8) ◽  
pp. 293-295
Author(s):  
Alan Smith ◽  
James Warner
Keyword(s):  
Critical Appraisal ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Complete Response Rate ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Study Data ◽  
Clinical Implications ◽  
Pharmaceutical Advertising ◽  
Transferable Skills ◽  
Better Than

Aims and MethodPharmaceutical advertising material can confuse clinical and statistical significance. We used a brief questionnaire (five questions) to evaluate psychiatrists' appreciation of this difference. This approximated to the level of critical appraisal competence of the MRCPsych part 3 examination.ResultsOf the 113 questionnaires distributed 93 were returned complete (response rate 82%). Senior trainees were significantly better than junior trainees at correctly interpreting data (mean score (maximum 5) 2.61v.2.08; P = 0.04). Consultants did less well than senior trainees, although our sample of consultant respondents was too small for significance testing.Clinical ImplicationsLearning critical appraisal for the MRCPsych examination may provide psychiatrists with valuable transferable skills and prevent gaps in our knowledge being exploited by misleading study data. Psychiatrists of all grades need to maintain their research appraisal skills and should not regard the MRCPsych examination as the end of their learning.

An Open-Label Study of Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin, Vincristine and Reduced-Dose Dexamethasone Combination Therapy in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients in Chinese Population.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 4816-4816
Author(s):  
Yang Shen ◽  
Zhixiang Shen ◽  
Bin Jiang ◽  
Jian Hou ◽  
Rong Zhan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Chinese Population ◽  
Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Combination Regimen ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Open Label Study ◽  
Reduced Dose

Abstract BACKGROUND: Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (CAELYX®) is a liposomal formulation of doxorubicin sterically stabilized by the grafting of segments of polyethylene glycol (PEG) onto the liposomal surface. Given the demonstrated efficacy of VAD (vincristine and doxorubicin and oral dexamethasone) in Multiple Myeloma (MM) patients and the potential for CAELYX® to extend the duration of bone marrow exposure to therapeutic levels of doxorubicin, a combination regimen of CAELYX®, vincristine, and reduced-dose dexamethasone (DVD) has been actively investigated in MM patients. Studies showed that substituting CAELYX® for doxorubicin in the VAD regimen and reducing the dose of dexamethasone in MM patients improves the safety profile and convenience of the treatment regimen without compromising efficacy. Due to potential differences in metabolism of these patients, safety and efficacy results may vary. Thus, we carried out this study in 82 newly diagnosed MM patients in China, in order to demonstrate the efficacy and safety profiles of DVD. METHODS: Patients (n=82) from 15 sites were recruited in this study. CAELYX® (40mg/m2) was infused intravenously over 60-minutes, administered every 28 days. Vincristine (2.0mg) was administered intravenously on Day 1 of each cycle. Dexamethasone (40 mg) was administered from Day 1- Day 4 of each cycle orally or intravenously. The treatment was repeated every 28 days for 4 cycles. RESULTS: Upon ITT analysis, the overall response rate was approximately 68% (56/82); 11% of the patients achieved complete remission (CR), 40% achieved partial response (PR), 17% achieved minimal response; 15% had stable disease (SD), and 12% o had progressive disease (PD) after the treatment. The cumulative 4-month progression-free survival (PFS) was 88%. The incidence of all the adverse events was 46%. The most common non-hematological toxicities were palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (13.4%) and stomatitis (6.1%), respectively. CONCLUSION: Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, vincristine and reduced dose dexamethasone combination (DVD) regimen is an effective and safe regimen in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients in Chinese population.

Bortezomib-Melphalan-Prednisone-Thalidomide Followed by Maintenance With Bortezomib-Thalidomide Compared With Bortezomib-Melphalan-Prednisone for Initial Treatment of Multiple Myeloma: Updated Follow-Up and Improved Survival

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (7) ◽  
pp. 634-640 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Palumbo ◽  
Sara Bringhen ◽  
Alessandra Larocca ◽  
Davide Rossi ◽  
Francesco Di Raimondo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Complete Response Rate ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
To Receive

Purpose Bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone (VMP) has improved overall survival in multiple myeloma. This randomized trial compared VMP plus thalidomide (VMPT) induction followed by bortezomib-thalidomide maintenance (VMPT-VT) with VMP in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Patients and Methods We randomly assigned 511 patients who were not eligible for transplantation to receive VMPT-VT (nine 5-week cycles of VMPT followed by 2 years of VT maintenance) or VMP (nine 5-week cycles without maintenance). Results In the initial analysis with a median follow-up of 23 months, VMPT-VT improved complete response rate from 24% to 38% and 3-year progression-free-survival (PFS) from 41% to 56% compared with VMP. In this analysis, median follow-up was 54 months. The median PFS was significantly longer with VMPT-VT (35.3 months) than with VMP (24.8 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.58; P < .001). The time to next therapy was 46.6 months in the VMPT-VT group and 27.8 months in the VMP group (HR, 0.52; P < .001). The 5-year overall survival (OS) was greater with VMPT-VT (61%) than with VMP (51%; HR, 0.70; P = .01). Survival from relapse was identical in both groups (HR, 0.92; P = .63). In the VMPT-VT group, the most frequent grade 3 to 4 adverse events included neutropenia (38%), thrombocytopenia (22%), peripheral neuropathy (11%), and cardiologic events (11%). All of these, except for thrombocytopenia, were significantly more frequent in the VMPT-VT patients. Conclusion Bortezomib and thalidomide significantly improved OS in multiple myeloma patients not eligible for transplantation.

scholarly journals Safety and Efficacy Analysis of Selinexor-Based Treatment in Multiple Myeloma, a Meta-Analysis Based on Prospective Clinical Trials

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yali Tao ◽  
Hui Zhou ◽  
Ting Niu
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Complete Response Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Grade 3

Background: Selinexor (SEL) is an orally bioavailable, highly-selective, and slowly-reversible small molecule that inhibits Exportin 1. Preclinical studies showed that SEL had synergistic antimyeloma activity with glucocorticoids, proteasome inhibitors (PIs) and immunomodulators. The combination of selinexor and dexamethasone (DEX) has been approved in the United States for patients with penta-refractory multiple myeloma in July 2019. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of selinexor based treatment in Multiple myeloma.Methods: We systematically searched the Medline (PubMed), Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials Library databases and ClinicalTrials.gov. Outcome measures of efficacy included overall response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), stringent complete response rate (sCR), complete response rate (CR), very good partial response (VGPR), partial response rate (PR), minimal response (MR), rate of stable disease (SDR), rate of progressive disease (PDR) and median progression-free survival (mPFS). Safety was evaluated by the incidences of all grade adverse events and Grade≥3 adverse events. The subgroup analysis was conducted to analyze the difference in different combination treatment regimens (SEL + DEX + PIs vs SEL + DEX).Results: We included six studies with 477 patients. The pooled ORR, CBR, sCR, CR, VGPR, PR, MR, SDR, and PDR were 43% (18–67%), 55% (32–78%), 5% (−2–13%), 7% (4–11%), 14% (5–24%), 23% (15–31%), 11% (8–14%), 26% (14–38%) and 14% (4–23%), respectively. SEL + DEX + PIs treatment had higher ORR (54 vs 24%, p = 0.01), CBR (66 vs 37%, p = 0.01), sCR (10 vs 2%, p = 0.0008), and VGPR (23 vs 5%, p &lt; 0.00001) compared to SEL + DEX treatment, and lower PDR (4 vs 23%, p &lt; 0.00001) and SDR (17 vs 37%, p = 0.0006). The pooled incidences of any grade and grade≥3 were 45 and 30% in hematological AEs, and in non-hematological AEs were 40 and 30%, respectively. The most common all grade (68%) and grade≥3 (54%) hematological AE were both thrombocytopenia. Fatigue was the most common all grade (62%) and grade≥3 (16%) non-hematological AE. Compared to SEL + DEX treatment, SEL + DEX + PIs treatment had lower incidences of hyponatremia (39 vs 12%, p &lt; 0.00001), nausea (72 vs 52%, p &lt; 0.00001), vomiting (41 vs 23%, p &lt; 0.0001), and weight loss (42 vs 17%, p = 0.03) in all grade AEs. Meanwhile, SEL + DEX + PIs treatment had lower incidences of anemia (36 vs 16%, p = 0.02), fatigue (20 vs 13%, p = 0.04), hyponatremia (22 vs 5%, p &lt; 0.0001) than SEL + DEX treatment in grade≥3 AEs.Conclusion: Our meta-analysis revealed that selinexor-based regimens could offer reasonable efficacy and tolerable adverse events in patients with multiple myeloma. SEL + DEX + PIs treatments had higher efficacy and lower toxicities than SEL + DEX.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document