scholarly journals Impact of Previous Nephrectomy on Clinical Outcome of Metastatic Renal Carcinoma Treated With Immune-Oncology: A Real-World Study on Behalf of Meet-URO Group (MeetUro-7b)

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Stellato ◽  
Daniele Santini ◽  
Elena Verzoni ◽  
Ugo De Giorgi ◽  
Francesco Pantano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Curative Intent ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazard ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Prospective Trials ◽  
Third Line ◽  
Immune Oncology ◽  
The Impact

BackgroundImmune-Oncology (IO) improves Overall Survival (OS) in metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC). The prognostic impact of previous Cytoreductive Nephrectomy (CN) and radical nephrectomy (RN), with curative intent, in patients treated with IO is not well defined. The aim of our paper is to evaluate the impact of previous nephrectomy on outcome of mRCC patients treated with IO.Methods287 eligible patients were retrospectively collected from 16 Italian referral centers adhering to the MeetUro association. Patients treated with IO as second and third line were included, whereas patients treated with IO as first line were excluded. Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test were performed to compare Progression Free Survival (PFS) and OS between groups. In our analysis, both CN and RN were included. The association between nephrectomy and other variables was analyzed in univariate and multivariate setting using the Cox proportional hazard model.Results246/287 (85.7%) patients had nephrectomy before IO treatment. Median PFS in patients who underwent nephrectomy (246/287) was 4.8 months (95%CI 3.9–5.7) vs 3.7 months (95%CI 1.9–5.5) in patients who did not it (HR log rank 0.78; 95%CI 0.53 to 1.15; p = 0.186). Median OS in patients who had previous nephrectomy (246/287) was 20.9 months (95%CI 17.6–24.1) vs 13 months (95%CI 7.7–18.2) in patients who did not it (HR log rank 0.504; 95%CI 0.337 to 0.755; p = 0.001). In the multivariate model, nephrectomy showed a significant association with OS (HR log rank 0.638; 95%CI 0.416 to 0.980), whereas gland metastases were still associated with better outcome in terms of both OS (HR log rank 0.487; 95%CI 0.279 to 0.852) and PFS (HR log rank 0.646; 95%CI 0.435 to 0.958).ConclusionsIO treatment, in patients who had previously undergone nephrectomy, was associated with a better outcome in terms of OS. Further prospective trials would assess this issue in order to guide clinicians in real word practice.

Impact of previous nephrectomy on clinical outcome of metastatic renal carcinoma treated with immune-oncology (I-O):A real-world study on behalf of Meet-URO group (MeetUro-7b).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e17088-e17088
Author(s):  
Marco Stellato ◽  
Daniele Santini ◽  
Ugo De Giorgi ◽  
Elena Verzoni ◽  
Chiara Casadei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Real World ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Outcome Data ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Curative Intent ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Third Line ◽  
Ecog Ps

e17088 Background: Immuno-oncology (IO) treatment demonstrated to improve Overall Survival (OS) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). The prognostic impact of previous citoreductive nephrectomy (CN) and radical nephrectomy with curative intent in patients (pts) treated with IO is not well defined. Methods: 229 eligible pts, with a least one radiological assessment of response according to the RECIST 1:1 criteria, were retrospectively collected from 16 Italian referral centers. Baseline characteristics, outcome data including progression-free survival (PFS) and OS were collected. Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were performed to compare PFS and OS between groups. Results: 153(66.8%) pts received IO as second line, 61(26.6%) as third line and 15(6.6%) pts as further line. 54 pts (23.6%) were good risk, 144(62.9%) were intermediate and 31(13.5%) were poor risk according to IMDC score. 189(82.5%) pts underwent nephrectomy (of them 72(32.4%) pts had synchronous metastatic disease and underwent CN), while 40(17.4%) pts did not. Nephrectomy was performed before IO treatment. ECOG PS, at the beginning of IO, was 0 for 167 pts (72.9%), the other 62 (27.1%) had ECOG PS 1 or 2. At a median follow up time of 17.5 months (mo), 13 (5.7%) pts are still in treatment while 216 (94.3%) experienced progression. 81 (35.3%) pts were treated after IO progression with mTOR and VEGFR inhibitors. 63 (27.5%) pts continued IO beyond progression. G3-G4 iAE were reported in 46 pts (20%). Median IO-PFS was 4.5 months in pts who did not undergo nephrectomy and 2.9 mo in pts who did (HR log rank 0.713, 95%CI 0.4788 to 1.063; p= 0.0582). Median IO-OS was 18.4 mo in pts who underwent nephrectomy and 10.3 mo in pts who did not (HR log rank 1.915, 95%CI 1.118 to 3.281; p= 0.0024). The difference in OS was irrespective of the IMDC criteria and the lines of treatment. Conclusions: In our real world experience, in mRCC pts treated with IO, previous nephrectomy was associated with a better outcome in terms of OS with all the limitations of a retrospective collection.

scholarly journals Polish Multi-Institutional Study of Children with Ependymoma—Clinical Practice Outcomes in the Light of Prospective Trials

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 2360
Author(s):  
Aleksandra Napieralska ◽  
Agnieszka Mizia-Malarz ◽  
Weronika Stolpa ◽  
Ewa Pawłowska ◽  
Małgorzata A. Krawczyk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brain Tumours ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Treatment ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Routine Practice ◽  
Primary Therapy ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazard ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Negative Prognostic Factor ◽  
Prospective Trials

We performed a multi-institutional analysis of 74 children with ependymoma to evaluate to what extent the clinical outcome of prospective trials could be reproduced in routine practice. The evaluation of factors that correlated with outcome was performed with a log rank test and a Cox proportional-hazard model. Survival was estimated with the Kaplan–Meier method. The majority of patients had brain tumours (89%). All had surgery as primary treatment, with adjuvant radiotherapy (RTH) and chemotherapy (CTH) applied in 78% and 57%, respectively. Median follow-up was 80 months and 18 patients died. Five- and 10-year overall survival (OS) was 83% and 73%. Progression was observed in 32 patients, with local recurrence in 28 cases. The presence of metastases was a negative prognostic factor for OS. Five- and 10-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 55% and 40%, respectively. The best outcome in patients with non-disseminated brain tumours was observed when surgery was followed by RTH (+/−CTH afterwards; p = 0.0001). Children under 3 years old who received RTH in primary therapy had better PFS (p = 0.010). The best outcome of children with ependymoma is observed in patients who received radical surgery followed by RTH, and irradiation should not be omitted in younger patients. The role of CTH remains debatable.

Comparative study of six cycles versus twelve cycles of adjuvant temozolomide post concurrent chemoradiation in newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13034-e13034
Author(s):  
Menal Bhandari ◽  
Ajeet K Gandhi ◽  
Pramod Kumar Julka ◽  
Chitra Sarkar ◽  
Dayanand Sharma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Extent Of Resection ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Score ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Mib 1

e13034 Background: This study assesses the impact of 6 cycles of adjuvant TMZ (conventional arm) versus 12 cycles (Extended arm) on Progression free survival (PFS), evaluate the toxicity and correlate the outcome with EGFR, P53 and MIB I labelling Index. Methods: Between December 2010 to October 2012, 36 post operative patients of Glioblastoma between age 18-65 years and Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) ≥ 70 were included. Patients were randomized to receive Radiation with a dose of 60 Gray in 30 fractions over 6 weeks at 2 gray/fraction with concomitant TMZ (75 mg/m2/day) and Adjuvant therapy with either 6 or 12 cycles of TMZ(150 mg/m2 for 5 days, 28 days cycle). Patients were then assessed monthly clinically and imaged with MRI/CT every 3 monthly or when symptomatic. Toxicity was assessed using CTCAE version 3.0. Statistical Analysis was done using SPSS version 17.0.Kaplan Meier method was used for analysis of survival and log rank test was used for assessing the impact of variables on survival. Results: Of 36 patients, 18 patients were treated in each arm. Median age and KPS in both the arms was 47 years and 80 respectively. 44 % patients in the conventional arm and 50% patients in the Extended arm underwent complete surgical resection. 22% patients in the conventional arm and 28% in the extended arm did not complete their intended treatment. Grade ¾ Thrombocytopenia was seen in 16% in the extended arm and 0% in the conventional arm.EGFR, P 53 and MIB 1 >20% was seen in 26%, 45% and 20% patients respectively, overall. Median follow up was 18 months for both the arms (Range 10-23 months).At last follow up,8 patients in each arm had progression. Median PFS was 10 months vs.18.4 months (p 0.47) in conventional and extended arm respectively. On Univariate analysis, patients with KPS ≤ 80 had poorer survival than those >80 (Median PFS 9.5 Months vs. 16.9 Months; p 0.02).Age, extent of resection, EGFR, P53, MIB 1 did not significantly alter survival in the two treatment groups. Conclusions: Our study showed that schedule of extended Temozolomide is well tolerated by patients and tend to have better progression free survival. Further prospective randomized studies are needed to validate the findings of our study.

scholarly journals Neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced unresectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: oncological outcomes at a single academic centre

ESMO Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. e000929
Author(s):  
Susana Roselló ◽  
Claudio Pizzo ◽  
Marisol Huerta ◽  
Elena Muñoz ◽  
Roberto Aliaga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Resectable Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Borderline Resectable ◽  
Curative Intent ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Dismal Prognosis

IntroductionPancreatic cancer (PC), even in the absence of metastatic disease, has a dismal prognosis. One-third of them are borderline resectable (BRPC) or locally advanced unresectable PC (LAUPC) at diagnosis. There are limited prospective data supporting the best approach on these tumours. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (ChT) is being increasingly used in this setting.MethodsThis is a retrospective series of consecutive patients staged as BRPC or LAUPC after discussion in the multidisciplinary board (MDB) at an academic centre. All received neoadjuvant ChT, followed by chemoradiation (ChRT) in some cases, and those achieving enough downstaging had a curative-intent surgery. Descriptive data about patient’s characteristics, neoadjuvant treatments, toxicities, curative resections, postoperative complications, pathology reports and adjuvant treatment were collected. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival was calculated with Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test.ResultsBetween August 2011 and July 2019, 49 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria, and all of them received neoadjuvant ChT. Fluorouracil+folinic acid, irinotecan and oxaliplatin was the most frequently used scheme (77%). The most prevalent grade 3 or 4 toxicities were neutropenia (26.5%), neurotoxicity (12.2%), diarrhoea (8.2%) and nausea (8.2%). 18 patients (36.7%) received ChRT thereafter. In total, 22 patients (44,9%) became potentially resectable and 19 of them had an R0 or R1 pancreatic resection. One was found to be unresectable at surgery and two refused surgery. A vascular resection was required in 7 (35%). No postoperative deaths were observed. Postoperative ChT was given to 12 (66.7%) of resected patients. Median OS of the whole cohort was 24,9 months (95% CI 14.1 to 35.7), with 30.6 months for resected and 13.1 months for non-resected patients, respectively (p<0.001).ConclusionA neoadjuvant approach in BRPC and LAUPC was well tolerated and allowed a curative resection in 38.8% of them with a potential improvement on OS.

scholarly journals Impact of Serum Albumin Concentration and Neutrophil-lymphocyte Ratio Score on Gastric Cancer Prognosis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Costa ◽  
J. Nogueiro ◽  
D. Ribeiro ◽  
P. Viegas ◽  
H. Santos-Sousa
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Palliative Surgery ◽  
Cancer Prognosis ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Albumin Concentration ◽  
Curative Intent ◽  
Neutrophil Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Introduction/AimSerum albumin concentration (COA) and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) could reflect immunological and nutritional status. We aim to evaluate the impact of COA-NLR score on the prognosis of gastric cancer (GC). Material and methodsWe perform a retrospective analysis on a database of 637 GC cases, between January 2010 and December 2017. In 396 patients the inclusion criteria for this study were met (non-resectional or palliative surgery were excluded). Analytic data was only available in 203 patients. COA-NLR score was defined as: COA under 35 g/L and NLR value of 2.585 or higher – score 2; one of these conditions – score 1; and neither – score 0. ResultsIn our population (n=203), 87 patients were classified as score 0, 82 as score 1 and 34 as score 2. COA-NLR score was significantly associated with DFS [HR 1,674; CI95% 1,115 – 2,513; p=0,013) and with OS [HR 2,072; CI95% 1,531 – 2,805; p<0,001]. Kaplan-Meier curves analysis (log-rank test) revealed that a higher score of COA-NLR predicted a worse OS (p<0,001) and DFS (p=0,03). COA-NLR was an independent prognostic factor for OS when adjusted to pStage and age [adjusted HR 1,566; CI95% 1,145 – 2,143; p=0,005]. ConclusionsPreoperative COA-NLR score was significantly associated with worse OS and DFS and, in this way, with worse prognosis on GC patients submitted to curative-intent resectional surgery.

Outcomes of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients treated with second-line chemotherapy (SL): A retrospective analysis of 166 patients

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19093-e19093
Author(s):  
M. C. Garassino ◽  
G. Michetti ◽  
M. Lo Dico ◽  
R. Califano ◽  
S. Aglione ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Analysis ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazard ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Show Evidence ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Third Line ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

e19093 Background: Patients with SCLC progressed after first-line chemotherapy (FL) have a poor prognosis and the evidence of a benefit of SL is still limited.This retrospective analysis evaluates the clinical outcomes of patients who received a SL treatment after failure of a FL for SCLC Methods: Retrospectively we reviewed 166 consecutive patients who failed a FL and received a second or third-line treatment, between 1993 and 2008 in 17 institutions. We divided patients for analysis in four subgroups, according to the type of SL administered: 1) Platinum-based (P) rechallenge 2) Non-platinum-based polichemotherapy 3) Non-topotecan monochemotherapy 4) topotecan monochemotherapy. Our endpoints were Overall survival (OS), Progression free survival (PFS) and Response Rate. Survival curves were designed with Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard model was used for investigating factors which influence survival Results: Median age was 63 (range 25–86). Median OS from the SL was 6.2 months and PFS 2.9. 163 patients received a platinum based chemotherapy as FL, among them 67% obtained a response (CR=14%, PR=53.7%) and 19% had a progressive disease. 74% of patients had a PS 0–1 when started on SL. Moreover, 50 patients underwent also a third-line chemotherapy. Of the 23 CR at FL, 7 patients achieved a response in SL(30%), of the 85 PR only 19 (22%) and of the PD+SD only 6 (16%) (test for trend p=.03). No statistical differences among regimens groups were found; however, patients rechallenged with P went better then others when a long PFS in FL was demonstrated (p=.02) Conclusions: The clinical benefit of SL therapy for SCLC is poor and strictly dependent on response and on duration of response with FL treatment. Our retrospective analysis confirms that median OS for patients receiving SL is about 6 months and median PFS 2.9 months. A rechallenge with platinum should be the best options in patients with a long PFS in FL. Single agent topotecan, the most investigated agent in the literature, did not show evidence of superiority against other chemotherapy regimens No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals Clinical Significance of Tumor Markers for Advanced Thymic Carcinoma: A Retrospective Analysis from the NEJ023 Study

Cancers ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 331
Author(s):  
Tomoyasu Mimori ◽  
Takehito Shukuya ◽  
Ryo Ko ◽  
Yusuke Okuma ◽  
Tomonobu Koizumi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tumor Marker ◽  
Tumor Markers ◽  
Thymic Carcinoma ◽  
Neuron Specific Enolase ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Cytokeratin 19 ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazard ◽  
Log Rank Test ◽  
Kaplan Meier

The optimal tumor marker for predicting the prognosis of advanced thymic carcinoma (ATC) remains unclear. We conducted a multi-institutional retrospective study of patients with ATC. A total of 286 patients were treated with chemotherapy. Clinicopathological information, including serum tumor markers, was evaluated to determine the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The carcinoembryonic antigen, cytokeratin-19 fragment, squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) antigen, progastrin-releasing peptide, neuron-specific enolase (NSE), and alpha-fetoprotein levels were evaluated. In the Kaplan–Meier analysis, the OS was significantly shorter in the patients with elevated NSE levels than in those with normal NSE levels (median, 20.3 vs. 36.8 months; log-rank test p = 0.029; hazard ratio (HR), 1.55; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.05–2.31 (Cox proportional hazard model)); a similar tendency regarding the PFS was observed (median, 6.4 vs. 11.0 months; log-rank test p = 0.001; HR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.31–3.18). No significant differences in the OS and PFS were observed among the other tumor markers. In both univariate and multivariate analyses of the patients with SCC only, the NSE level was associated with the OS and PFS. Thus, the NSE level may be a prognostic tumor marker for thymic carcinoma, regardless of histology.

Examining progression-free survival in first- and second-line treatment for BRAF-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 728-728
Author(s):  
Belinda Lee ◽  
Angelyn Anton ◽  
Margaret Lee ◽  
Rachel Wong ◽  
Phillip Parente ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Mutation Status ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

728 Background: BRAF mutated (BRAFm) CRC represents ~10% of all CRC and is associated with significantly poorer prognosis. However, responses to chemotherapy do still occur. Some data suggest that the poor prognosis associated with BRAFm CRC is dominated by substantially poorer second line PFS (PFS2), whereas first line PFS (PFS1) was similar for both BRAFm and BRAF wildtype (BRAFwt) CRC. Using a large multicenter dataset, our study aimed to examine PFS1 and PFS2 in BRAFm versus BRAFwt CRC. Methods: Prospectively collected data from the Treatment of Recurrent and Advanced Colorectal Cancer (TRACC) database was interrogated. PFS was calculated and compared in patients with BRAFm versus BRAFwt CRC. Median survival was determined by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log rank test. Results: TRACC identified 523 CRC patients with known BRAF mutation status, who received first-line chemotherapy: 53 (10%) were BRAFm, while 470 (90%) were BRAFwt. At the time of data analysis, only 231 (44%) CRC patients had received second-line chemotherapy, of which 21 (9%) were BRAFm and 210 (91%) were BRAFwt. PFS1 analyses demonstrated significantly poorer survival in the BRAFm population (Median 7.8mo versus 11.5mo, HR 1.72, p = 0.0026). PFS2 analyses revealed similar findings for the BRAFm population, albeit non-significant due to smaller numbers (Median 5.5mo versus 7.7mo, HR1.26, p = 0.44). Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that BRAFm CRC was associated with poorer PFS in both first- and second-line settings. Additional analyses will be performed to examine the impact of different treatment strategies and other clinicopathological features.

Evaluating Contemporary Radiotherapy Approaches in the Primary Treatment of Cervical Cancer

2010 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 1087-1091 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajiv Samant ◽  
Sofya Kobeleva ◽  
Choan E ◽  
Khalid Balaraj ◽  
Tien Le ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Treatment ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Curative Intent ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Group 1

Purpose:Radiotherapy with concurrent cisplatinum-based chemotherapy became a standard recommendation for the management of advanced cervical cancer in 1999. We reviewed our experience with this approach to determine the impact on patient outcomes.Methods:A retrospective review of all cervical cancer patients treated with curative intent using radical radiotherapy ± chemotherapy from 1992 to 2005 was performed. Survival and relapse rates were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and were compared using the log-rank test.Results:During this period, 224 treated patients were identified: 153 (68%) were treated between 1992 and 1999 (group 1) and 71 (32%) were treated after 1999 (group 2). The median age was 53 and 55 years with a median follow-up of 49 and 34 months for groups 1 and 2, respectively. Stage classification and histological diagnosis were similar for both groups. Treatment usually consisted of external beam pelvic radiotherapy (40-45 Gy in 20-25 fractions) followed by low-dose rate brachytherapy (35-40 Gy to point A). Chemotherapy consisted of weekly intravenous cisplatinum (40 mg/m2) given concurrently with pelvic radiation. The proportion of patients receiving chemotherapy increased significantly after 1999, 12% in group 1 compared with 79% in group 2 (P < 0.01). The 5-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 53% and 54% for group 1 and 64% and 67% for group 2. The improvement in PFS for group 2 approached statistical significance (P = 0.06), but the difference in OS did not.Conclusions:There has been a significant increase in the use of concurrent chemoradiation for cervical cancer treatment after 1999, and this seems to have led to higher rates of PFS and OS, although these have yet to achieve statistical significance.

scholarly journals PATH-13. SEX-LINKED TUMORAL MGMT STATUS AND OUTCOMES IN NEWLY DIAGNOSED GLIOBLASTOMA

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi145-vi145
Author(s):  
Addison Barnett ◽  
Anas Saeed Bamashmos ◽  
Assad Ali ◽  
Hong Li ◽  
David Bosler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazard ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazard Models ◽  
Tertiary Care Institution ◽  
The Impact

Abstract INTRO/OBJECTIVE Glioblastoma (GBM) and MGMT have been reported to have sexual dimorphism. The primary objective of this study was to analyze the impact and association between sex and MGMT status on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with newly diagnosed GBM. METHODS 582 patients with newly diagnosed GBM who underwent first surgical intervention at a single tertiary care institution between 2012 and 2018 were reviewed. Adults with documented methylated (≥ 12) and un-methylated (≤ 7) MGMT status were included. A Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard models were used to analyze the association between sex and MGMT status on PFS and OS. RESULTS 464 adult patients (median age 63.4, 36.6% female) had documented MGMT status. Overall rate of MGMT methylated patients was 42.5%, while females were more often methylated than males (52.1% vs 37.4%, p=0.004). MGMT methylated compared to un-methylated females (median: 12.8 vs 7.4 months; 1-yr: 53% vs 27%) had a greater PFS benefit than males (median: 9.6 vs 6.8 months; 1-yr: 44% vs 23%). OS was significantly improved in MGMT methylated compared to un-methylated patients among females (p=0.001) but not among males (p=0.22). Among MGMT methylated patients, females had significantly better OS compared to males (median: 18.7 vs 12.4 months; 2-yr OS: 36.8% vs 24.3%, p=0.03). Although statistically not significant, a similar pattern was observed on PFS (median: 12.8 vs 9.6 months; 1-yr PFS: 52.6% vs 44.4%). Compared to MGMT methylated females, MGMT methylated males had a PFS HR=1.22 (95% CI=0.80 – 1.85, p=0.36), and an OS HR=1.45 (95% CI=1.03 – 2.04, p=0.032). CONCLUSION MGMT methylation is more common in females and methylation had a larger impact on both PFS and OS in females compared to males. These analyses highlight the need to further investigate sex differences that can inform clinical management of GBM.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document