scholarly journals Systematic Review of Antimicrobial Combination Options for Pandrug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii

Antibiotics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 1344
Author(s):  
Stamatis Karakonstantis ◽  
Petros Ioannou ◽  
George Samonis ◽  
Diamantis P. Kofteridis

Antimicrobial combinations are at the moment the only potential treatment option for pandrug-resistant A. baumannii. A systematic review was conducted in PubMed and Scopus for studies reporting the activity of antimicrobial combinations against A. baumannii resistant to all components of the combination. The clinical relevance of synergistic combinations was assessed based on concentrations achieving synergy and PK/PD models. Eighty-four studies were retrieved including 818 eligible isolates. A variety of combinations (n = 141 double, n = 9 triple) were tested, with a variety of methods. Polymyxin-based combinations were the most studied, either as double or triple combinations with cell-wall acting agents (including sulbactam, carbapenems, glycopeptides), rifamycins and fosfomycin. Non-polymyxin combinations were predominantly based on rifampicin, fosfomycin, sulbactam and avibactam. Several combinations were synergistic at clinically relevant concentrations, while triple combinations appeared more active than the double ones. However, no combination was consistently synergistic against all strains tested. Notably, several studies reported synergy but at concentrations unlikely to be clinically relevant, or the concentration that synergy was observed was unclear. Selecting the most appropriate combinations is likely strain-specific and should be guided by in vitro synergy evaluation. Furthermore, there is an urgent need for clinical studies on the efficacy and safety of such combinations.

2020 ◽  
Vol 4S;23 (8;4S) ◽  
pp. S351-S366
Author(s):  
Vanessa B. Boralli

Background: Chloroquine (CQ) and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) are old drugs used against malaria, rheumatism, inflammation in the joints, lupus, among others. These drugs showed positive results in preliminary scientific research for treatment of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2). Since the studies with CQ and HCQ are initial with small patient populations, it is not yet known whether there are adverse effects from the use of CQ and HCQ for patients infected with the coronavirus. Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of CQ and HCQ used against viral infection caused by SARS-CoV-2. Study Design: This is a narrative review of the traditional prescriptions of CQ and HCQ efficacy and adverse effects as well as their employment for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Setting: In vitro and clinical studies comparing the antiviral efficacy and adverse effect profile of CQ and HCQ against COVID-19 in adult patients were evaluated. Methods: A systemic search of reviews, including in vitro and clinical trial studies in English focusing on CQ and HCQ effects and adverse effects against COVID-19 in the adult patient population from PubMed was performed. It included studies reporting chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine effects and adverse effects against COVID-19. Results: A total of 42 articles published between 2004 and April 2020 were reviewed for therapeutic use of CQ and HCQ. Both these drugs showed a significant in vitro potential against coronavirus. Many studies for clinical use of CQ and HCQ showed that patients presented adverse reactions on high doses. Limitations: Clinical studies have some methodology shortcomings, such as lack of information about the treatment and small number of experimental patients, leading to a misinterpretation of the data. Besides, there are few clinical studies with a limited sample size. Moreover, most of them did not present control groups, and some patients had died during these protocols. Discussion: Despite both CQ and HCQ in vitro antiviral evidence, clinically, both drugs, either alone or combined with other medications, may increase the risk of cardiac arrhythmias, leading to cardiac arrest and sudden death. Besides, a lot of uncertainty still remains, such as starting administration period, dose prescribed, length of treatment, patients’ condition, concomitant drug use, among others. Conclusion: From the studies reviewed, it is not possible to state the precise efficacy and safety of CQ and HCQ use in the treatment of COVID-19 at any time in the course of the disease. Future studies are warranted. Key words: SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19; chloroquine; hydroxychloroquine; pandemic; coronavirus; adverse effects; side effects; cardiac arrhythmias; ocular toxicity, retinopathy; pharmacokinetic.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 7-7
Author(s):  
Unaiza Faizan ◽  
Muhammad Saad Farooqi ◽  
Hassaan Imtiaz ◽  
Muhammad Yasir Anwar ◽  
Muhammad Khawar Sana ◽  
...  

Introduction: POEMS syndrome (polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy/edema, myeloma protein, skin changes) is a rare disorder associated with plasma cell neoplasia where an overproduction of proinflammatory cytokines such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) upregulates vasculogenesis and increases vascular permeability resulting in multiple symptoms of the disease e.g. edema and hemangioma. Although the limited-stage disease can be treated with radiotherapy, treatment for the more advanced disease remains unclear. Here we offer a systematic review of the efficacy and safety of treatment regimens used to treat POEMS syndrome in the adult population. Methods: Databases i.e. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and clinicaltrials.gov were searched since inception through May 15th, 2020, following the PRISMA guidelines. Out of 421 studies, 8 articles (5 prospective clinical trials, and 3 retrospective studies) were included. Phase I clinical trials, abstracts, case reports, case series, and review articles were excluded. Results: A total of 171 patients (21-79 years of age) were evaluated in 8 clinical studies. Immunomodulator Based Regimens: In the 5 clinical studies (N=96) where lenalidomide (Len) plus dexamethasone (Dex) were used, the hematological (heme) complete response (CR) ranged from 20% to 46%. Heme CR was defined as the absence of monoclonal immunoglobulins in serum or urine. VEGF CR defined as normalization of serum VEGF levels ranged from 35% to 80%. Neurological response defined as the improvement in the overall neuropathy limitations scale (ONLS) by at least one score ranged from 0% to 95%. These studies reported 2-3 year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of 59% to 92% and 90% to 100%, respectively. In the study by Suichi et al. (N=5), VEGF CR was reported to be 80%. However, no neurological improvement was seen in these patients. Proteasome Inhibitor Based Regimens: In the study by He et al. (N=20) bortezomib in combination with cyclophosphamide and Dex yielded heme, VEGF, and neurological responses in 76%, 88%, and 95% of the patients, respectively. No grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse effects (TRAE) were seen. Conventional Chemotherapy Based Regimens: In the phase II trial conducted by Misawa et al. (N=25) the reduction in serum VEGF levels, as well as clinical response as measured by improvement in muscle strength, was higher in the thalidomide arm as compared to the placebo arm. Grade ≥3 TRAE reported in the treatment arm were cardiac arrest, heart failure, and dehydration in 1 (8%) patient each. In the study by Li et al. (N=31) melphalan (Mel) in combination with Dex achieved heme, VEGF, and neurological response rates of 81%, 100%, and 100%, respectively. Twenty percent of the patients experienced grade ≥3 TRAE. Conclusion: Immunomodulator and chemotherapy based regimens appear to have a reasonable safety and efficacy profile. Lenalidomide and melphalan based therapies were most effective. Proteasome inhibitors based regimens yielded efficacious results without significant toxicity. More studies with existing and newer combinations with autologous stem cell transplantation are warranted. Disclosures Anwer: Incyte, Seattle Genetics, Acetylon Pharmaceuticals, AbbVie Pharma, Astellas Pharma, Celegene, Millennium Pharmaceuticals.: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonal Singh ◽  
Thomas J Moore

BACKGROUND: Hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine are widely used to treat hospitalized COVID-19 patients primarily based on antiviral activity in in vitro studies. Our objective was to systematically evaluate their efficacy and safety in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. METHODS: We systematically reviewed PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Medrxviv for studies of hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine in COVID-19 hospitalized patients on April 26, 2020. We evaluated the quality of trials and observational studies using the Jadad criteria and Newcastle Ottawa Scale, respectively. RESULTS: After a review of 175 citations, we included 5 clinical trials (total of 345 patients), 9 observational studies (n = 2529), and 6 additional studies (n = 775) reporting on the QT interval. Three studies reported treatment benefits including two studies reporting benefit on virologic outcomes, which was statistically significant in one study, and another reported significant improvement on cough symptoms. Three studies reported that treatment was potentially harmful, including an significantly increased risk of mortality in two studies and increased need for respiratory support in another. Eight studies were unable to detect improvements on virologic outcomes (n = 3) or pneumonia or transfer to ICU/death (n = 5). The proportion of participants with critical QTc intervals of ≥ 500 ms or an increase of ≥ 60 ms from baseline ranged from 8.3% to 36% (n = 8). One clinical trial and six observational studies were of good quality. The remaining studies were of poor quality. CONCLUSIONS: Our systematic review of reported clinical studies did not identify substantial evidence to support the efficacy of hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine in hospitalized COVID-19 patients and raises questions about potential harm from QT prolongation and increased mortality.


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4822-4822
Author(s):  
Rooma Habib ◽  
Wajeeha Aiman ◽  
Ishan Garg ◽  
Rabiya Niaz ◽  
Sigmone Khalid Butt ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the most common type of leukemia in adults. Despite the advancements in drug therapies, CLL is largely incurable, and relapsed/refractory (R/R) patients have a very poor prognosis. Chimeric antigen receptor T (CART) cell therapy has shown promising results in B-cell malignancies. We conducted a systematic review to assess the efficacy and safety of CART cell therapy in patients with CLL. Methods: PRISMA guidelines were followed to perform the literature search and selection of articles for this systematic review. A search was performed using databases including PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, Embase, and clinicaltrials.gov. We used the following Mesh and Emtree terms, "Chronic lymphocytic leukemia" AND "Adoptive immunotherapy" from the inception of literature till 06/11/2021. Out of 1319 articles, we screened and included nine clinical studies (N=208) measuring the efficacy (i.e., complete response, partial response, etc.) and safety (adverse events ≥grade 3) in clinical terms. We excluded case reports, pre-clinical studies, review articles, and meta-analyses. Results: In 9 clinical studies, 158 patients with CLL were treated with anti-CD19 CART cell therapy. The range of age of the patients was 38-75 years. A high dose was used in 38 patients, and ibrutinib was added in 19 patients with CLL. The therapy was well tolerated with ≥grade 3 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurological toxicity reported in 23/151 (15%) and 20/151 (13%) of the patients, respectively. Table 1. Complete response (CR), partial response (PR), and overall response (OR) were seen in 40% (54/134), 17% (22/126), and 56% (103/183). In the clinical study by Frey et al. (N=51)., progression-free survival (PFS) and ORR were significantly higher in the high dose (5x10 8 cells/kg) group as compared to the low dose (5x10 7 cells/kg) group (1.8 months vs. one month and 53% vs. 29%, respectively) without significantly increasing treatment-related adverse events (TRAE). In the clinical study by Gauthier et al. (N=38)., ORR was significantly high in the anti-CD19 CART cell therapy + ibrutinib group compared to the no ibrutinib group (83% vs. 56%). Neutropenia, infection, thrombocytopenia, leukemia, hypocalcemia, elevated ALT, and tumor lysis syndrome were common ≥grade 3 TRAEs reported in these patients (Table 1). More clinical trials are targeting CD-20, CD-137, CD-7, CD-28, ROR1, etc (Table 2). Conclusion: Anti-CD19 CART cell therapy was safe and effective in the treatment of CLL patients. A high dose of 5x10 8/kg CART cell therapy was well tolerated and had superior efficacy. Adding ibrutinib to CART cell therapy was safe and more effective than anti-CD19 CART cell therapy alone. More placebo-controlled randomized multicenter studies are needed to confirm these results. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 34-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle Sendyk ◽  
Daniele Sigal Linhares ◽  
Claudio Mendes Pannuti ◽  
João Batista de Paiva ◽  
José Rino Neto

ABSTRACT Objectives: This review aimed at evaluating changes in alveolar bone thickness after completion of orthodontic treatment. Methods: Only prospective clinical studies that reported bone thickness in adult patients undergoing non-surgical orthodontic treatment were considered eligible. MEDLINE, EMBASE and LILACS databases were searched for articles published up to July 2018. Results: A total of 12 studies met the selected criteria. Most of the studies showed that orthodontic treatment produces a reduction in bone thickness of incisors, mainly at the palatal side. Conclusion: On patients undergoing different orthodontic treatment techniques, there was a significant bone thickness reduction, mainly on the palatal side. Clinical relevance: These findings are relevant and have to be considered in diagnosis and planning of tooth movement, in order to prevent the occurrence of dehiscence and fenestration in alveolar bone.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-22
Author(s):  
Farzad Salehpour ◽  
Mahsa Khademi ◽  
Michael R. Hamblin

Background: Photobiomodulation (PBM) involves the use of red and/or near-infrared light from lasers or LEDs to improve a wide range of medical disorders. Transcranial PBM, sometimes accompanied by intranasal PBM, has been tested to improve many brain disorders, including dementia. Objective: To conduct a systematic review according to PRISMA guidelines of pre-clinical and clinical studies reporting the use of PBM, which were considered relevant to dementia. Methods: Literature was searched between 1967 and 2020 using a range of keywords relevant to PBM and dementia. The light source and wavelength(s), output power, irradiance, irradiation time, fluence or total energy (dose), operation mode (continuous or pulsed) irradiation, approach and site, number of treatment sessions, as well as study outcome(s) were extracted. Results: Out of 10,473 initial articles, 36 studies met the inclusion criteria. Nine articles reported in vitro studies, 17 articles reported studies in animal models of dementia, and 10 studies were conducted in dementia patients. All of the included studies reported positive results. The clinical studies were limited by the small number of patients, lack of placebo controls in some instances, and only a few used objective neuroimaging methods. Conclusion: The preliminary evidence of clinical benefit, the lack of any adverse effects, and the remarkable ease of use, suggest larger clinical trials should be conducted as soon as possible.


Antibiotics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 646
Author(s):  
Song Oh ◽  
Raymond Chau ◽  
Anh T. Nguyen ◽  
Justin R. Lenhard

Despite the recent development of antibacterials that are active against multidrug-resistant pathogens, drug combinations are often necessary to optimize the killing of difficult-to-treat organisms. Antimicrobial combinations typically are composed of multiple agents that are active against the target organism; however, many studies have investigated the potential utility of combinations that consist of one or more antibacterials that individually are incapable of killing the relevant pathogen. The current review summarizes in vitro, in vivo, and clinical studies that evaluate combinations that include at least one drug that is not active individually against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, or Staphylococcus aureus. Polymyxins were often included in combinations against all three of the Gram-negative pathogens, and carbapenems were commonly incorporated into combinations against K. pneumoniae and A. baumannii. Minocycline, sulbactam, and rifampin were also frequently investigated in combinations against A. baumannii, whereas the addition of ceftaroline or another β-lactam to vancomycin or daptomycin showed promise against S. aureus with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin or daptomycin. Although additional clinical studies are needed to define the optimal combination against specific drug-resistant pathogens, the large amount of in vitro and in vivo studies available in the literature may provide some guidance on the rational design of antibacterial combinations.


2021 ◽  
Vol 331 ◽  
pp. e292-e293
Author(s):  
A.F.G. Cicero ◽  
F. Fogacci ◽  
A. Zambon ◽  
P.P. Toth ◽  
C. Borghi

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank Oechslin ◽  
Carmen Menzi ◽  
Philippe Moreillon ◽  
Gregory Resch

AbstractEndolysins are peptidoglycan hydrolases produced at the end of the bacteriophage (phage) replication cycle to lyse the host cell. Gram-positive phages endolysins come in a variety of multi-modular forms that combine different catalytic domains and may have evolved to adapt to their bacterial hosts. However, the reason why phage can adopt endolysin with such complex multidomain architecture is for the moment not well understood.We used the Streptococcus dysgalactiae phage endolysin PlySK1249 as a model to study the implication of multi-domain architecture in phage-induced bacterial lysis and lysis regulation. The activity of the enzyme relied on a bacteriolytic amidase (Ami), a non-bacteriolytic L-Ala-D-Ala endopeptidase (CHAP) acting as a de-chaining enzyme and central LysM cell wall binding domain (CBD).Ami and CHAP synergized for peptidoglycan digestion and bacteriolysis in the native enzyme or when expressed individually and reunified in vitro. This cooperation could be modulated by bacterial cell wall-associated proteases, which specifically cleaved the two linkers connecting the different domains. While both catalytic domains were observed to act coordinately to optimize bacterial lysis, the CBD is expected to delay diffusion of the enzyme until proteolytic inactivation is achieved.As for certain autolysins, PlySK1249 cleavage by bacterial cell wall associated proteases might be an example of dual phage-bacterial regulation and mutual coevolution. In addition, understanding more thoroughly the multidomain interplay of PlySK1249 opens new perspectives on the ideal architecture of therapeutic antibacterial endolysins.


Author(s):  
Ahmed S. Ali ◽  
Ekram A. Saied ◽  
Sharifa M. Theeban ◽  
Mazen M. Humayran ◽  
Assmaa Ahmed Shaker ◽  
...  

Background: Many publications discussed the potential role of medicinal plants in the management of COVID-19. However, clinical studies of the efficacy and safety of specified phytochemical(s) are limited. Objectives: To explore the pharmacological profile of specified compounds against COVID-19 Method: Systematic literature search of academic databases to explore specified phytochemicals for the management of COVID-19 using appropriate search terms. Rayyan software was used to organize 786 citations of which. 236 articles were included in this review. Results: Initially 70 compounds were identified to have a potential role in the management of COVID-19. In this review, 18 compounds were selected for further search Conclusion: In vitro anti-SARS-CoV-2activity has been demonstrated for a variety of natural compounds. However, preclinical research for most phytochemicals is scarce, and only a few compounds have been evaluated in clinical trials against COVID-19. A comprehensive pharmacological profile of these phytochemicals is urgently needed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document