scholarly journals Survival of Korean Patients with Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Compensated for the Asbestos Injury Relief

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (20) ◽  
pp. 9713
Author(s):  
Min-Sung Kang ◽  
Sung-Soo Lee ◽  
Soon-Chan Kwon ◽  
Da-An Huh ◽  
Yong-Jin Lee
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Occupational Exposure ◽  
Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma ◽  
Malignant Mesothelioma ◽  
Asbestos Exposure ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Smoking History ◽  
Pleural Mesothelioma ◽  
Histological Subtype ◽  
Epidemiologic Characteristics

Background: The purpose of this study was to identify the epidemiologic characteristics and prognostic factors for malignant pleural mesothelioma in Korea, which are currently insufficient. The data were derived from malignant mesothelioma patients who registered under the Asbestos Injury Relief Act; Methods: A total of 728 patients received compensation from the Asbestos Injury Relief Act due to malignant mesothelioma between 2011 and 2015. Of these, 313 patients (43.0%) with malignant pleural mesothelioma were included in the study. The study variables were sex (male, female), age at diagnosis (<59, 60–69, ≥70), smoking history (yes, no), surgery (yes, no), chemotherapy (yes, no), occupational exposure to asbestos (yes, no), and histological subtype (epithelioid, nonepithelioid); Results: Median survival of mesothelioma was 8.0 months (95% confidence interval: 6.2 to 9.8). The 1-year, 2-year, and 5-year survival rates (%) were 43.5%, 23.6%, and 12.5%, respectively. In multivariate analysis of Cox’s proportional hazards model; sex, age, smoking history, occupational asbestos exposure, and histological subtype were not significant prognostic factors, but surgery and chemotherapy combined was a significant predictor; Conclusions: Although the representativeness of these data is limited, our study estimates the epidemiologic characteristics of malignant pleural mesothelioma. Non-occupational exposure had a similar prognosis to occupational asbestos exposure, and there was no sex difference. In addition, it was found that receiving a combination of surgery and chemotherapy affects the survival rate, but there is a limitation in that factors such as performance status, comorbidities, and stage that contribute to survival are not considered.

scholarly journals Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Outcomes in the Era of Combined Platinum and Folate Antimetabolite Chemotherapy

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathieu D. Saint-Pierre ◽  
Christopher Pease ◽  
Hamid Mithoowani ◽  
Tinghua Zhang ◽  
Garth A. Nicholas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma ◽  
Asbestos Exposure ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Pleural Mesothelioma ◽  
Cox Models ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Incremental Improvement

Introduction. Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is associated with a poor prognosis. Palliative platinum-based chemotherapy may help to improve symptoms and prolong life. Since 2004, the platinum is commonly partnered with a folate antimetabolite. We performed a review investigating if survival had significantly changed before and after the arrival of folate antimetabolites in clinical practice. Methods. All MPM patients from January 1991 to June 2012 were identified. Data collected included age, gender, asbestos exposure, presenting signs/symptoms, performance status, histology, stage, bloodwork, treatment modalities including chemotherapy, and date of death or last follow-up. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Cox models were applied to determine variables associated with survival. Results. There were 245 patients identified. Median overall survival for all patients was 9.4 months. After multivariate analysis, performance status, stage, histology, leucocytosis, and thrombophilia remained independently associated with survival. Among all patients who received chemotherapy, there was no difference in overall survival between the periods before and after folate antimetabolite approval: 14.2 versus 13.2 months (P=0.35). Specifically receiving combined platinum-based/folate antimetabolite chemotherapy did not improve overall survival compared to all other chemotherapy regimens: 14.1 versus 13.6 months (P=0.97). Conclusions. In this review, we did not observe an incremental improvement in overall survival after folate antimetabolites became available.

Prognostic factors in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM): A mono-institutional evaluation of Bologna Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Group.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18509-e18509
Author(s):  
Daniela Adua ◽  
Francesca Sperandi ◽  
Paolo Castellucci ◽  
Barbara Melotti ◽  
Stefania Giaquinta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Prognostic Factor ◽  
Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Multimodality Treatment ◽  
Extrapleural Pneumonectomy ◽  
Pleural Mesothelioma ◽  
Histological Subtype ◽  
The Impact

e18509 Background: The prognostic systems currently in use in MPM, such as the EORTC and CALGB score, include the clinical and histological parameters, excluding the FDG-PET (PET) evaluation and the possibility of surgery. The aim of our study was to investigate the role of PET baseline SUV-max and surgery as prognostic factors in MPM. Methods: From April 2002to December 2012, 48 pts with a certain histological diagnosis of MPM underwent staging by PET scan before peri-operative (multimodality treatment) or palliative first-line chemotherapy (CT). Surgery was performed in 22(45.8%) pts. Pt characteristics: males 44(91.7%), females 4(8.3%); median age 65 (51-77) years; ECOG PS 0-1 45(93.7 %), PS 2 3(6.3 %); IMIG stage I-II 18(37.5%), III-IV 30(62.5%); histological subtype epithelial 40(83.3%), mixed 5(10.4%), sarcomatoid 3(6.3%); extrapleural pneumonectomy 8(16.8%), pleurectomy/decortication 14(29.2%), 17 (35.4%) VATS plus pleurodesis, 19(39.6%) no surgical procedures. Platinum based CT was performed in combination with pemetrexed in 39(81.3%) pts and with gemcitabine in 9(18.7%). According to the EORTC score 30(62.5%) pts were classified in the good prognosis group and 18(37.5%) as poor prognosis. The cut-off value of PET baseline SUV-max calculated by ROC analysis was 9; SUV-max at baseline PET was ≤ 9 in 32(66.7%) pts and >9 in 16(33.3%). Median overall survival (OS) was 12 (3-60) months. Results: Upon validating the impact of individual factors on OS using the Kaplan-Meier analysis, we found statistical significance was reached by histology (p=0.0038) and surgery (p=0.0027). In a multivariate analysis using the Cox regression system, considering OS as a dependent variable, according to age, histology, stage, PET baseline SUV-max and surgery, epithelial histology (p =0.002) and surgery (p=0.012) achieved a statistical significance. SUV-max at baseline PET was not statistically significant (p = 0.290), excluding it as a possible independent prognostic factor in MPM. Conclusions: This analysis does not indicate any prognostic value for baseline PET in MPM, confirming the importance of histological subtype and introducing surgery as a possible prognostic factor.

scholarly journals Multiplex Soluble Biomarker Analysis from Pleural Effusion

Biomolecules ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 1113
Author(s):  
Joman Javadi ◽  
Katalin Dobra ◽  
Anders Hjerpe
Keyword(s):  
Pleural Effusion ◽  
Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma ◽  
Malignant Mesothelioma ◽  
Prognostic Markers ◽  
Pleural Cavity ◽  
Asbestos Exposure ◽  
Pleural Mesothelioma ◽  
Diagnostic Biomarkers ◽  
Biomarker Analysis ◽  
Angiopoietin 1

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a highly aggressive and therapy resistant pleural malignancy that is caused by asbestos exposure. MPM is associated with poor prognosis and a short patient survival. The survival time is strongly influenced by the subtype of the tumor. Dyspnea and accumulation of pleural effusion in the pleural cavity are common symptoms of MPM. The diagnostic distinction from other malignancies and reactive conditions is done using histopathology or cytopathology, always supported by immunohistochemistry, and sometimes also by analyses of soluble biomarkers in effusion supernatant. We evaluated the soluble angiogenesis related molecules as possible prognostic and diagnostic biomarkers for MPM by Luminex multiplex assay. Pleural effusion from 42 patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM), 36 patients with adenocarcinoma (AD) and 40 benign (BE) effusions were analyzed for 10 different analytes that, in previous studies, were associated with angiogenesis, consisting of Angiopoietin-1, HGF, MMP-7, Osteopontin, TIMP-1, Galectin, Mesothelin, NRG1-b1, Syndecan-1 (SDC-1) and VEGF by a Human Premixed Multi-Analyte Luminex kit. We found that shed SDC-1 and MMP-7 levels were significantly lower, whereas Mesothelin and Galectin-1 levels were significantly higher in malignant mesothelioma effusions, compared to adenocarcinoma. Galectin-1, HGF, Mesothelin, MMP-7, Osteopontin, shed SDC-1, NRG1-β1, VEGF and TIMP-1 were significantly higher in malignant pleural mesothelioma effusions compared to benign samples. Moreover, there is a negative correlation between Mesothelin and shed SDC-1 and positive correlation between VEGF, Angiopoietin-1 and shed SDC-1 level in the pleural effusion from malignant cases. Shed SDC-1 and VEGF have a prognostic value in malignant mesothelioma patients. Collectively, our data suggest that MMP-7, shed SDC-1, Mesothelin and Galectin-1 can be diagnostic and VEGF and SDC-1 prognostic markers in MPM patients. Additionally, Galectin-1, HGF, Mesothelin, MMP-7, Osteopontin, shed SDC-1 and TIMP-1 can be diagnostic for malignant cases.

scholarly journals Management of Pleural Effusion Secondary to Malignant Mesothelioma

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (18) ◽  
pp. 4247
Author(s):  
Valeria Musso ◽  
Cristina Diotti ◽  
Alessandro Palleschi ◽  
Davide Tosi ◽  
Alberto Aiolfi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pleural Effusion ◽  
Occupational Exposure ◽  
Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma ◽  
Malignant Mesothelioma ◽  
Therapeutic Options ◽  
Pleural Mesothelioma ◽  
Common Cause ◽  
Comprehensive View ◽  
Clinical Challenge

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a highly aggressive pleural tumour which has been epidemiologically linked to occupational exposure to asbestos. MPM is often associated with pleural effusion, which is a common cause of morbidity and whose management remains a clinical challenge. In this review, we analysed the literature regarding the diagnosis and therapeutic options of pleural effusion secondary to mesothelioma. Our aim was to provide a comprehensive view on this subject, and a new algorithm was proposed as a practical aid to clinicians dealing with patients suffering from pleural effusion.

Clinical characteristics, treatment, and survival outcomes in malignant pleural mesothelioma: A institution experience in Turkey.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18544-e18544 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehmet Kucukoner ◽  
Muhammed Ali Kaplan ◽  
Ali Inal ◽  
Zuhat Urakcı ◽  
Ozlem Abakay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Pleural Mesothelioma ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Clinicopathologic Characteristics ◽  
Rank Analysis ◽  
Significant Difference

e18544 Background: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a aggressive tumor that causes high mortality. Treatment of MPM remains disappointing, even new approaches are present today. Methods: The present study retrospectively examined the data related to 150 patients with MPM who were examined and treated in our center in Turkey from 2005 to 2012. The aims of this study were; to investigate clinicopathologic characteristics, treatment modalities and potential prognostic factors. Results: There were 87 males (58%) and 63 females (42%), 92 of the patients (61.3%) had an asbestos contact and this contact was generally environmental. Surgical resection (EPP or P/D) was used in 32 patients, 87 patients (58%) received only chemotherapy. The median progression free and overall survival (PFS and OS) for all patients were 10.6 and 14.8 months. There was no statistically significant difference between the patients who received pemetrexed/cisplatin (54 patients) and gemcitabine/cisplatin (28 patients) regimens in terms of the PFS and OS (p=0.145, p=0.244). The comparison between patients who were operated on and those who were not did not reveal any statistical difference in PFS and OS (p=0.416, p=0.095). There was no difference in both PFS and OS rates in comparison of patients who had P/D or EPP (p=0.87, p=0.652). Log rank analysis, ECOG performance status (p=0.018), histology (p<0.001), stage (p<0.001) and leukocytosis (p=0.005) were found to be significant prognostic factors in OS. At multivariate analysis, ECOG performance status (p=0.016), and stage (p<0.001) remained independently associated with OS. Conclusions: In survival analysis revealed significant differences in terms of both the PFS and OS, performance status, histology, stage and leukocytosis. EPP or P / D surgical options did not provide difference in term of survival. Survival rates in patients who received combining platinum analogues with pemetrexed or gemcitabine as front-line chemotherapy were found similar.

Prognostic factors affecting survival in malignant pleural mesothelioma.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18535-e18535
Author(s):  
Berna Eren Komurcuoglu
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Smoking History ◽  
Serum Lactate Dehydrogenase ◽  
Pleural Mesothelioma ◽  
Advanced Clinical Stage ◽  
Poor Prognostic Factor ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Stage Of Disease

e18535 Background: Determining the pre-treatment prognostic factors in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is of importance in terms of both estimating the course of disease and determining the patients who are candidate to multimodal therapy. Aim of the current study was to determine the prognostic factors affecting survival in the patients with MPM. Methods: One hundred and twenty five patients who had been diagnosed histologically as having MPM over the past 5 years were evaluated retrospectively. Relationships of survival of the patients with their age, gender, exposure to asbestos, smoking history, platelet, hemoglobin, leukocyte (WBC), serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) values, their histology, performance scores and stage of disease were examined. Results: Advanced clinical stage, N2 nodal involvement and presence of distant metastasis were found to be related to survival. Sarcomatous histology was found to be poor prognostic factor independently of other factors. Conclusions: We showed that histological subtype and stage of disease were the most important parameters in planning the treatment, especially in determining the patients who were candidate multimodal treatment and estimating the prognosis.

scholarly journals Malignant Mesothelioma Mimicking Invasive Mammary Carcinoma in a Male Breast

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Mokhtar Desouki ◽  
Daniel Jerad Long
Keyword(s):  
Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma ◽  
Malignant Mesothelioma ◽  
Asbestos Exposure ◽  
Lobular Carcinoma ◽  
Strong Association ◽  
Final Diagnosis ◽  
Pleural Mesothelioma ◽  
Invasive Mammary Carcinoma ◽  
Pleomorphic Lobular Carcinoma ◽  
The Right

Malignant mesothelioma is an uncommon tumor with strong association with asbestos exposure. Few cases of malignant pleural mesothelioma metastatic to the female breast have been reported. Herein, we presented, for the first time, a case of locally infiltrating malignant pleural mesothelioma forming a mass in the breast of a male as the first pathologically confirmed manifestation of the disease. Breast ultrasound revealed an irregular mass in the right breast which involves the pectoralis muscle. Breast core biopsy revealed a proliferation of neoplastic epithelioid cells mimicking an infiltrating pleomorphic lobular carcinoma. IHC studies showed the cells to be positive for calretinin, CK5/6, WT1, and CK7. The cells were negative for MOC-31, BerEp4, ER, and PR. A final diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma, epithelioid type, was rendered. This case demonstrates the importance of considering a broad differential diagnosis in the setting of atypical presentation with application of a panel of IHC markers.

scholarly journals Identification of Redox-Sensitive Transcription Factors as Markers of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 1138
Author(s):  
Martina Schiavello ◽  
Elena Gazzano ◽  
Loredana Bergandi ◽  
Francesca Silvagno ◽  
Roberta Libener ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Oxidative Stress ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma ◽  
Antioxidant Defense ◽  
Asbestos Exposure ◽  
Predictive Biomarkers ◽  
Antioxidant Systems ◽  
Pleural Mesothelioma ◽  
Related Factor ◽  
Aggressive Cancer

Although asbestos has been banned in most countries around the world, malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a current problem. MPM is an aggressive tumor with a poor prognosis, so it is crucial to identify new markers in the preventive field. Asbestos exposure induces oxidative stress and its carcinogenesis has been linked to a strong oxidative damage, event counteracted by antioxidant systems at the pulmonary level. The present study has been focused on some redox-sensitive transcription factors that regulate cellular antioxidant defense and are overexpressed in many tumors, such as Nrf2 (Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2), Ref-1 (Redox effector factor 1), and FOXM1 (Forkhead box protein M1). The research was performed in human mesothelial and MPM cells. Our results have clearly demonstrated an overexpression of Nrf2, Ref-1, and FOXM1 in mesothelioma towards mesothelium, and a consequent activation of downstream genes controlled by these factors, which in turn regulates antioxidant defense. This event is mediated by oxidative free radicals produced when mesothelial cells are exposed to asbestos fibers. We observed an increased expression of Nrf2, Ref-1, and FOXM1 towards untreated cells, confirming asbestos as the mediator of oxidative stress evoked at the mesothelium level. These factors can therefore be considered predictive biomarkers of MPM and potential pharmacological targets in the treatment of this aggressive cancer.

scholarly journals Increased Standardised Incidence Ratio of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma in Taiwanese Asbestos Workers: A 29-Year Retrospective Cohort Study

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheng-Kuan Lin ◽  
Yu-Ying Chang ◽  
Jung-Der Wang ◽  
Lukas Jyuhn-Hsiarn Lee
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
General Population ◽  
Incidence Rate ◽  
Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Asbestos Exposure ◽  
Pleural Mesothelioma ◽  
Calendar Period ◽  
Incident Cases

Objective. This paper aimed to determine the standardised incidence ratio (SIR) of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) in workers exposed to asbestos in Taiwan.Methods. All workers employed in asbestos-related factories and registered by the Bureau of Labour Insurance between 1 March, 1950, and 31 December, 1989, were included in the study and were followed from 1 January, 1980, through 31 December, 2009. Incident cases of all cancers, including MPM (ICD-9 code: 163), were obtained from the Taiwan Cancer Registry. SIRs were calculated based on comparison with the incidence rate of the general population of Taiwan and adjusted for age, calendar period, sex, and duration of employment.Results. The highest SIR of MPM was found for male workers first employed before 1979, with a time since first employment more than 30 years (SIR 4.52, 95% CI: 2.25–8.09). After consideration of duration of employment, the SIR for male MPM was 5.78 (95% CI: 1.19–16.89) for the workers employed for more than 20 years in asbestos-related factories.Conclusions. This study corroborates the association between occupational asbestos exposure and MPM. The highest risk of MPM was found among male asbestos workers employed before 1979 and working for more than 20 years in asbestos-related factories.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document