scholarly journals Babam2 Regulates Cell Cycle Progression and Pluripotency in Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells as Revealed by Induced DNA Damage

Biomedicines ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 397
Author(s):  
Cheuk Yiu Tenny Chung ◽  
Paulisally Hau Yi Lo ◽  
Kenneth Ka Ho Lee
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Stem Cells ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Gamma Irradiation ◽  
Cellular Senescence ◽  
Cell Cycle Regulation ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Embryonic Stem ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Cycle Regulation

BRISC and BRCA1-A complex member 2 (Babam2) plays an essential role in promoting cell cycle progression and preventing cellular senescence. Babam2-deficient fibroblasts show proliferation defect and premature senescence compared with their wild-type (WT) counterpart. Pluripotent mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) are known to have unlimited cell proliferation and self-renewal capability without entering cellular senescence. Therefore, studying the role of Babam2 in ESCs would enable us to understand the mechanism of Babam2 in cellular aging, cell cycle regulation, and pluripotency in ESCs. For this study, we generated Babam2 knockout (Babam2−/−) mESCs to investigate the function of Babam2 in mESCs. We demonstrated that the loss of Babam2 in mESCs leads to abnormal G1 phase retention in response to DNA damage induced by gamma irradiation or doxorubicin treatments. Key cell cycle regulators, CDC25A and CDK2, were found to be degraded in Babam2−/− mESCs following gamma irradiation. In addition, Babam2−/− mESCs expressed p53 strongly and significantly longer than in control mESCs, where p53 inhibited Nanog expression and G1/S cell cycle progression. The combined effects significantly reduced developmental pluripotency in Babam2−/− mESCs. In summary, Babam2 maintains cell cycle regulation and pluripotency in mESCs in response to induced DNA damage.

scholarly journals A novel CDC25A/DYRK2 regulatory switch modulates cell cycle and survival

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maribel Lara-Chica ◽  
Alejandro Correa-Sáez ◽  
Rafael Jiménez-Izquierdo ◽  
Martín Garrido-Rodríguez ◽  
Francisco J. Ponce ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Cell Cycle Regulation ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Inverse Correlation ◽  
Genotoxic Stress ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Relevant Effect ◽  
Regulatory Loop ◽  
Cycle Regulation

AbstractThe cell division cycle 25A (CDC25A) phosphatase is a key regulator of cell cycle progression that acts on the phosphorylation status of Cyclin–Cyclin-dependent kinase complexes, with an emergent role in the DNA damage response and cell survival control. The regulation of CDC25A activity and its protein level is essential to control the cell cycle and maintain genomic integrity. Here we describe a novel ubiquitin/proteasome-mediated pathway negatively regulating CDC25A stability, dependent on its phosphorylation by the serine/threonine kinase DYRK2. DYRK2 phosphorylates CDC25A on at least 7 residues, resulting in its degradation independent of the known CDC25A E3 ubiquitin ligases. CDC25A in turn is able to control the phosphorylation of DYRK2 at several residues outside from its activation loop, thus affecting DYRK2 localization and activity. An inverse correlation between DYRK2 and CDC25A protein amounts was observed during cell cycle progression and in response to DNA damage, with CDC25A accumulation responding to the manipulation of DYRK2 levels or activity in either physiological scenario. Functional data show that the pro-survival activity of CDC25A and the pro-apoptotic activity of DYRK2 could be partly explained by the mutual regulation between both proteins. Moreover, DYRK2 modulation of CDC25A expression and/or activity contributes to the DYRK2 role in cell cycle regulation. Altogether, we provide evidence suggesting that DYRK2 and CDC25A mutually control their activity and stability by a feedback regulatory loop, with a relevant effect on the genotoxic stress pathway, apoptosis, and cell cycle regulation.

scholarly journals Phosphorylation of RCC1 on Serine 11 Facilitates G1/S Transition in HPV E7-Expressing Cells

Biomolecules ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 995
Author(s):  
Xiaoyan Hou ◽  
Lijun Qiao ◽  
Ruijuan Liu ◽  
Xuechao Han ◽  
Weifang Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Cell Cycle Regulation ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Mtor Pathway ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Post Translational Modifications ◽  
Hpv E7 ◽  
Cycle Regulation

Persistent infection of high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) plays a causal role in cervical cancer. Regulator of chromosome condensation 1 (RCC1) is a critical cell cycle regulator, which undergoes a few post-translational modifications including phosphorylation. Here, we showed that serine 11 (S11) of RCC1 was phosphorylated in HPV E7-expressing cells. However, S11 phosphorylation was not up-regulated by CDK1 in E7-expressing cells; instead, the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway promoted S11 phosphorylation. Knockdown of AKT or inhibition of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway down-regulated phosphorylation of RCC1 S11. Furthermore, S11 phosphorylation occurred throughout the cell cycle, and reached its peak during the mitosis phase. Our previous data proved that RCC1 was necessary for the G1/S cell cycle progression, and in the present study we showed that the RCC1 mutant, in which S11 was mutated to alanine (S11A) to mimic non-phosphorylation status, lost the ability to facilitate G1/S transition in E7-expressing cells. Moreover, RCC1 S11 was phosphorylated by the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway in HPV-positive cervical cancer SiHa and HeLa cells. We conclude that S11 of RCC1 is phosphorylated by the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway and phosphorylation of RCC1 S11 facilitates the abrogation of G1 checkpoint in HPV E7-expressing cells. In short, our study explores a new role of RCC1 S11 phosphorylation in cell cycle regulation.

Pyk2 and FAK differentially regulate progression of the cell cycle

2000 ◽  
Vol 113 (17) ◽  
pp. 3063-3072 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Zhao ◽  
C. Zheng ◽  
J. Guan
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Regulation ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Expression System ◽  
Chimeric Protein ◽  
Kinase Domain ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Erk Activation ◽  
Terminal Domain ◽  
Cycle Regulation

We have previously identified FAK and its associated signaling pathways as a mediator of cell cycle progression by integrins. In this report, we have analyzed the potential role and mechanism of Pyk2, a tyrosine kinase closely related to FAK, in cell cycle regulation by using tetracycline-regulated expression system as well as chimeric molecules. We have found that induction of Pyk2 inhibited G(1) to S phase transition whereas comparable induction of FAK expression accelerated it. Furthermore, expression of a chimeric protein containing Pyk2 N-terminal and kinase domain and FAK C-terminal domain (PFhy1) increased cell cycle progression as FAK. Conversely, the complementary chimeric molecule containing FAK N-terminal and kinase domain and Pyk2 C-terminal domain (FPhy2) inhibited cell cycle progression to an even greater extent than Pyk2. Biochemical analyses indicated that Pyk2 and FPhy2 stimulated JNK activation whereas FAK or PFhy1 had little effect on it, suggesting that differential activation of JNK by Pyk2 may contribute to its inhibition of cell cycle progression. In addition, Pyk2 and FPhy2 to a greater extent also inhibited Erk activation in cell adhesion whereas FAK and PFhy1 stimulated it, suggesting a role for Erk activation in mediating differential regulation of cell cycle by Pyk2 and FAK. A role for Erk and JNK pathways in mediating the cell cycle regulation by FAK and Pyk2 was also confirmed by using chemical inhibitors for these pathways. Finally, we showed that while FAK and PFhy1 were present in focal contacts, Pyk2 and FPhy2 were localized in the cytoplasm. Interestingly, both Pyk2 and FPhy2 (to a greater extent) were tyrosine phosphorylated and associated with Src and Fyn. This suggested that they may inhibit Erk activation in an analogous manner as the mislocalized FAK mutant (Δ)C14 described previously by competing with endogenous FAK for binding signaling molecules such as Src and Fyn. This model is further supported by an inhibition of endogenous FAK association with active Src by Pyk2 and FPhy2 and a partial rescue by FAK of Pyk2-mediated cell cycle inhibition.

Abstract W P198: Sphingomyelin Synthases Regulate Neuronal Cell Proliferation and Cell Cycle Progression

Stroke ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 45 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Umadevi V Wesley ◽  
Daniel Tremmel ◽  
Robert Dempsey
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Regulation ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Neuronal Cell ◽  
Artery Occlusion ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Cycle Arrest ◽  
Cycle Regulation ◽  
Cerebral Artery Occlusion

Introduction: The molecular mechanisms of cerebral ischemia damage and protection are not completely understood, but a number of reports implicate the contribution of lipid metabolism and cell-cycle regulating proteins in stroke out come. We have previously shown that tricyclodecan-9-yl-xanthogenate (D609) resulted in increased ceramide levels after transient middle cerebral artery occlusion (tMCAO) in spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR). We hypothesized that D609 induced cell cycle arrest probably by inhibiting sphingomyelin synthase (SMS). In this study, we examined the direct effects of SMS on cell cycle progression and proliferation of neuroblast cells. Methods: Ischemia was induced by middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) and reperfusion. Expression levels were measured by western blot analysis, RT-PCR, and Immunofluorescence staining. SMS1 and 2 expressions were silenced by stable transfection with SMS1/2-targeted shRNA. Cell cycle analysis was performed using Flow cytometry. Data were analyzed using MODFIT cell cycle analysis program. Cell proliferation rate was measured by MTT assay. Results: We have identified that the expression of SMS1is significantly up-regulated in the ischemic hemisphere following MCAO. Neuro-2a cells transfected with SMS specific ShRNA acquired more neuronal like phenotype and exhibited decreased proliferation rate. Also, silencing of both SMS1 and 2 induced cell-cycle arrest as shown by significantly increased percentage of cells in G0/G1 and decreased proportion of cells in S-phase as compared to control cells. This was accompanied by up-regulation of cyclin-dependent kinase (Cdk) inhibitors p21 and decreased levels of phophorylated AKT levels. Furthermore, loss of SMS inhibited the migratory potential of Neuro 2a cells. Summary: Up-regulation of SMS under ischemic/reperfusion conditions suggests that this enzyme potentially contributes to cell cycle regulation and may contribute to maintaining neuronal cell population. Further studies may open up a new direction for identifying the molecular mechanisms of cell cycle regulation and protection following ischemic stroke

The direct and indirect effects of corticosterone and primary adipose tissue on MCF7 breast cancer cell cycle progression

2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yaniv Shpilberg ◽  
Michael K. Connor ◽  
Michael C. Riddell
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Adipose Tissue ◽  
Cancer Cell ◽  
Indirect Effects ◽  
Cell Cycle Regulation ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Direct And Indirect Effects ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Cycle Regulation

AbstractBreast cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality in women. Glucocorticoids (GCs) have the potential to directly affect breast cancer or indirectly via changes to the tumor growth microenvironment a breast cancer is exposed to. The role of GCs in breast cancer progression by direct and indirect means are not fully understood.To study the direct and indirect effects of GCs on breast cancer cell cycle regulation.MCF7 breast cancer cells were incubated with increasing concentrations of corticosterone (CORT) to investigate the direct effects. In addition, MCF7 cells were cultured in conditioned media (CM) from primary adipose tissue excised from CORT-supplemented lean and obese male rats.CORT alone resulted in dose-dependent increases in p27 and hypophosphorylated retinoblastoma protein (Rb) which was accompanied by a reduction in the number of cells in S-phase. CM prepared from adipose tissue overrode these direct CORT effects, suggesting that the tumor growth microenvironment created in the CM dominates MCF7 cell cycle regulation.The direct inhibitory effects of CORT on cancer cell cycle progression are largely limited by the hormone’s effects on adipose tissue biology.

The MEIS1 Interactome in Megakaryocytes Reveals a Role in Cell Cycle Regulation,

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 3380-3380
Author(s):  
Vishal A Salunkhe ◽  
Iain Macaulay ◽  
Sylvia Nuernberg ◽  
Cathal McCarthy ◽  
Willem Hendrik Ouwehand ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Regulation ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Cyclin D3 ◽  
Haematopoietic Stem Cell ◽  
Nuclear Fraction ◽  
Cell Cycle Regulators ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Cycle Regulation

Abstract Abstract 3380 Haematopoiesis is highly coordinated process of fate determination at branch points that is regulated by transcription factors and their cofactors. Our comprehensive catalogue of transcripts in the eight main mature blood cell elements, including erythroblasts and megakaryocytes (MKs) showed that the transcription factor MEIS1 is uniquely transcribed in MKs and the CD34+ haematopoietic stem cell. Gene silencing studies in mice and zebrafish has shown a pivotal role for MEIS1 in haematopoiesis, megakaryopoiesis and vasculogenesis, although its precise hierarchical position and function remain unknown. To gain further insight in the role of MEIS1 in megakaryopoiesis, we used a proteomics approach to search for its nuclear interaction partners. Co-immunoprecipitation was used to isolate MEIS1 interacting proteins from the nuclear fraction of the MK cell line, CHRF 288–11 and resulting eluates were subjected to proteomics analysis using one-dimensional electrophoresis and liquid chromatography (LC) coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (MS) or GeLC-MS/MS. In total 70 proteins were identified to co-immunoprecipitate with MEIS1 from 3 replicate MS analyses. These included the previously validated MEIS1 interactors PBX1 and HOXB9, as well as numerous novel interactors such as ARID3B and DHX9. Network analysis of our MEIS1 interactome dataset revealed a strong association with cell cycle regulation. In fact, we had identified a myriad of cell cycle regulators including CDK1, CDK2, CDK9, CUL3, PCNA, CDC5L, ARID3B and MDC1. These interactions are consistent with recent microarray studies in promyelocytic leukemic cell lines that link MEIS1 with cell cycle entry and its regulation of genes such as CDK2, CDK6, CDKN3, CDC7 and Cyclin D3 among others. To confirm the novel interaction of MK MEIS1 with cell cycle regulators we performed reverse immuno-precipitation/immunoblot analysis in CHRF cells and purified MEIS1 containing multiprotein complexes from L8057 murine megakaryoblastic cells. Using a cell cycle specific PCR array, we demonstrate that MEIS1 overexpression in L8057 cells regulates numerous cell cycle regulatory genes. Preliminary analysis using flow cytometry demonstrated that MEIS1 overexpression resulted in an altered cell cycle progression. Furthermore, genome wide ChIP-Seq analysis in CHRF cells for MEIS1 revealed binding sites in Cyclin D3 and CDK6, two known key regulators of the cell cycle and megakaryopoiesis. Taken together this study provides evidence linking MEIS1 to the cell cycle control of MKs and will help elucidate the role of MEIS1 in cell cycle progression, megakaryopoiesis and associated disorders. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document