scholarly journals New Treatment Options for Advanced Gastroesophageal Tumours: Mature for the Current Practice?

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 301
Author(s):  
Hannah Christina Puhr ◽  
Matthias Preusser ◽  
Gerald Prager ◽  
Aysegül Ilhan-Mutlu
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Targeted Therapy ◽  
Targeted Therapies ◽  
Current Practice ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Novel Agents ◽  
Novel Treatment ◽  
New Treatment ◽  
Current Impact

Several clinical trials attempted to identify novel treatment options for advanced gastroesophageal tumours in first, second and further lines. Although results of targeted therapy regimens were mainly disappointing, novel immunotherapy agents showed promising activity, which led to their approval in second and third lines in many countries. This review focuses on the results of recent clinical trials investigating novel agents including targeted therapies, immunotherapy components and chemotherapies and discuss their current impact as well as current approval status on the treatment armamentarium of advanced gastroesophageal tumours.

scholarly journals Therapeutic Challenges for Cisplatin-Resistant Ovarian Germ Cell Tumors

Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 1584 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ugo De Giorgi ◽  
Chiara Casadei ◽  
Alice Bergamini ◽  
Laura Attademo ◽  
Gennaro Cormio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Germ Cell ◽  
Targeted Therapies ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Germ Cell Tumors ◽  
High Dose Chemotherapy ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Resistant Disease ◽  
New Treatment

The majority of patients with advanced ovarian germ cell cancer are treated by cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Despite adequate first-line treatment, nearly one third of patients relapse and almost half develop cisplatin-resistant disease, which is often fatal. The treatment of cisplatin-resistant disease is challenging and prognosis remains poor. There are limited data on the efficacy of specific chemotherapeutic regimens, high-dose chemotherapy with autologous progenitor cell support and targeted therapies. The inclusion of patients in clinical trials is strongly recommended, especially in clinical trials on the most frequent male germ cell tumors, to offer wider therapeutic opportunities. Here, we provide an overview of current and potential new treatment options including combination chemotherapy, high-dose chemotherapy and molecular targeted therapies, for patients with cisplatin-resistant ovarian germ cell tumors.

Opportunities and challenges in targeted therapy and immunotherapy for pancreatic cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dujuan Cao ◽  
Qianqian Song ◽  
Junqi Li ◽  
Yuanyuan Jiang ◽  
Zhimin Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Targeted Therapy ◽  
Targeted Therapies ◽  
Poor Prognosis ◽  
Research Progress ◽  
Malignant Tumours ◽  
First Line ◽  
The Past ◽  
New Treatment

Abstract Pancreatic cancer is one of the most malignant tumours with a poor prognosis. In recent years, the incidence of pancreatic cancer is on the rise. Traditional chemotherapy and radiotherapy for pancreatic cancer have been improved, first-line and second-line palliative treatments have been developed, and adjuvant treatments have also been used in clinical. However, the 5-year survival rate is still less than 10% and new treatment methods such as targeted therapy and immunotherapy need to be investigated. In the past decades, many clinical trials of targeted therapies and immunotherapies for pancreatic cancer were launched and some of them showed an ideal prospect in a subgroup of pancreatic cancer patients. The experience of both success and failure of these clinical trials will be helpful to improve these therapies in the future. Therefore, the current research progress and challenges of selected targeted therapies and immunotherapies for pancreatic cancer are reviewed.

scholarly journals Co-Clinical Trials: An Innovative Drug Development Platform for Cholangiocarcinoma

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 51
Author(s):  
Brinda Balasubramanian ◽  
Simran Venkatraman ◽  
Kyaw Zwar Myint ◽  
Tavan Janvilisri ◽  
Kanokpan Wongprasert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Targeted Therapy ◽  
Drug Development ◽  
Surgical Resection ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Time Data ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Innovative Drug ◽  
Curative Intent

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), a group of malignancies that originate from the biliary tract, is associated with a high mortality rate and a concerning increase in worldwide incidence. In Thailand, where the incidence of CCA is the highest, the socioeconomic burden is severe. Yet, treatment options are limited, with surgical resection being the only form of treatment with curative intent. The current standard-of-care remains adjuvant and palliative chemotherapy which is ineffective in most patients. The overall survival rate is dismal, even after surgical resection and the tumor heterogeneity further complicates treatment. Together, this makes CCA a significant burden in Southeast Asia. For effective management of CCA, treatment must be tailored to each patient, individually, for which an assortment of targeted therapies must be available. Despite the increasing numbers of clinical studies in CCA, targeted therapy drugs rarely get approved for clinical use. In this review, we discuss the shortcomings of the conventional clinical trial process and propose the implementation of a novel concept, co-clinical trials to expedite drug development for CCA patients. In co-clinical trials, the preclinical studies and clinical trials are conducted simultaneously, thus enabling real-time data integration to accurately stratify and customize treatment for patients, individually. Hence, co-clinical trials are expected to improve the outcomes of clinical trials and consequently, encourage the approval of targeted therapy drugs. The increased availability of targeted therapy drugs for treatment is expected to facilitate the application of precision medicine in CCA.

Dystrophinopathies and Limb-Girdle Muscular Dystrophies

2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (04) ◽  
pp. 262-272 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Sarkozy ◽  
Mariacristina Scoto ◽  
Francesco Muntoni ◽  
Joana Domingos
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Shoulder Girdle ◽  
Muscle Disease ◽  
Standards Of Care ◽  
Muscular Dystrophies ◽  
New Treatment ◽  
Shoulder Girdle Muscles ◽  
Independent Ambulation ◽  
Duchenne's Muscular Dystrophy

AbstractMuscular dystrophies are a heterogeneous group of inherited diseases. The natural history of these disorders along with their management have changed mainly due to a better understanding of their pathophysiology, the evolution of standards of care, and new treatment options. Dystrophinopathies include both Duchenne's and Becker's muscular dystrophies, but in reality they are a spectrum of muscle diseases caused by mutations in the gene that encodes the protein dystrophin. Duchenne's muscular dystrophy is the most common form of inherited muscle disease of childhood. The current standards of care considerably prolong independent ambulation and survival. Several therapeutic options either aiming at substituting/correcting the primary protein defect or limiting the progression of the dystrophic process are currently being explored in clinical trials.Limb-girdle muscular dystrophies (LGMDs) are rare and heterogeneous conditions, characterized by weakness and wasting of the pelvic and shoulder girdle muscles. Originally classified into dominant and recessive, > 30 genetic forms of LGMDs are currently recognized. Further understanding of the pathogenic mechanisms of LGMD will help identifying novel therapeutic approaches that can be tested in clinical trials.

scholarly journals New drug developments in metastatic gastric cancer

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 175628481880807 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron C. Tan ◽  
David L. Chan ◽  
Wasek Faisal ◽  
Nick Pavlakis
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Targeted Therapies ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Predictive Biomarkers ◽  
Metastatic Gastric Cancer ◽  
New Era

Metastatic gastric cancer is associated with a poor prognosis and novel treatment options are desperately needed. The development of targeted therapies heralded a new era for the management of metastatic gastric cancer, however results from clinical trials of numerous targeted agents have been mixed. The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors has yielded similar promise and results from early trials are encouraging. This review provides an overview of the systemic treatment options evaluated in metastatic gastric cancer, with a focus on recent evidence from clinical trials for targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors. The failure to identify appropriate predictive biomarkers has hampered the success of many targeted therapies in gastric cancer, and a deeper understanding of specific molecular subtypes and genomic alterations may allow for more precision in the application of novel therapies. Identifying appropriate biomarkers for patient selection is essential for future clinical trials, for the most effective use of novel agents and in combination approaches to account for growing complexity of treatment options.

scholarly journals Is there a role for adjuvant therapy after surgery in “high risk for recurrence” kidney cancer? An update on current concepts

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Sharma ◽  
C. Tajzler ◽  
A. Kapoor
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Targeted Therapy ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Patient Population ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Significant Proportion ◽  
High Risk Patient ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Cochrane Reviews

BackgroundAlthough surgical resection remains the standard of care for localized kidney cancers, a significant proportion of patients experience systemic recurrence after surgery and hence might benefit from effective adjuvant therapy. So far, several treatment options have been evaluated in adjuvant clinical trials, but only a few have provided promising results. Nevertheless, with the recent development of targeted therapy and immunomodulatory therapy, a series of clinical trials are in progress to evaluate the potential of those novel agents in the adjuvant setting. In this paper, we provide a narrative review of the progress in this field, and we summarize the results from recent adjuvant trials that have been completed.MethodsA literature search was conducted. The primary search strategy at the medline, Cochrane reviews, and http://ClinicalTrials.gov/ databases included the keywords “adjuvant therapy,” “renal cell carcinoma,” and “targeted therapy or/and immunotherapy.”ConclusionsData from the s-trac study indicated that, in the “highest risk for recurrence” patient population, disease-free survival was increased with the use of adjuvant sunitinib compared with placebo. The assure trial showed no benefit for adjuvant sunitinib or sorafenib in the “intermediate- to high-risk” patient population. The ariser (adjuvant girentuximab) and protect (adjuvant pazopanib) trials indicated no survival benefit, but subgroup analyses in both trials recommended further investigation. The inconsistency in some of the current results can be attributed to a variety of factors pertaining to the lack of standardization across the trials. Nevertheless, patients in the “high risk of recurrence” category after surgery for their disease would benefit from a discussion about the potential benefits of adjuvant treatment and enrolment in ongoing adjuvant trials.

scholarly journals Molecular Insights and Emerging Strategies for Treatment of Metastatic Uveal Melanoma

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (10) ◽  
pp. 2761
Author(s):  
Fabiana Mallone ◽  
Marta Sacchetti ◽  
Alessandro Lambiase ◽  
Antonietta Moramarco
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Uveal Melanoma ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Metastatic Tumor ◽  
Clinical Use ◽  
Future Perspectives ◽  
Diagnosis And Prognosis ◽  
Novel Treatment ◽  
Combinational Therapies

Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common intraocular cancer. In recent decades, major advances have been achieved in the diagnosis and prognosis of UM allowing for tailored treatments. However, nearly 50% of patients still develop metastatic disease with survival rates of less than 1 year. There is currently no standard of adjuvant and metastatic treatment in UM, and available therapies are ineffective resulting from cutaneous melanoma protocols. Advances and novel treatment options including liver-directed therapies, immunotherapy, and targeted-therapy have been investigated in UM-dedicated clinical trials on single compounds or combinational therapies, with promising results. Therapies aimed at prolonging or targeting metastatic tumor dormancy provided encouraging results in other cancers, and need to be explored in UM. In this review, the latest progress in the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of UM in adjuvant and metastatic settings are discussed. In addition, novel insights into tumor genetics, biology and immunology, and the mechanisms underlying metastatic dormancy are discussed. As evident from the numerous studies discussed in this review, the increasing knowledge of this disease and the promising results from testing of novel individualized therapies could offer future perspectives for translating in clinical use.

scholarly journals Systemic treatment options for advanced biliary tract carcinoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 55 (10) ◽  
pp. 944-957
Author(s):  
Changqing Xie ◽  
Nicole A. McGrath ◽  
Cecilia Monge Bonilla ◽  
Jianyang Fu
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Targeted Therapy ◽  
Biliary Tract ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Current Status ◽  
Dna Mismatch ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Molecular Landscape ◽  
Line Setting

Abstract Advanced biliary tract cancers (BTC) include a diverse collection of rare and heterogenous tumors with poor prognosis. The combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin is the established first-line therapy for advanced BTC. There are no accepted standard treatments in the second line setting, though there are several ongoing clinical trials that implement chemotherapy as a therapeutic strategy. The understanding of the molecular landscape of BTC has offered hope of targeted therapies to the identified actionable genomic aberrations, such as FGFR2 gene fusions, mutations of IDH1/2, HER2, BRAC1/2 and BRAF. Pembigatinib has become the first approved targeted therapy for BTC with FGFR2 fusion or other rearrangements. Recent immunotherapy has opened new therapy avenues in BTC with pembrolizumab approved for either microsatellite instability high (MSI-H) or DNA mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) advanced solid tumors, including BTC. The combination of immunotherapy with other modalities is currently being evaluated in different clinical trials, since single agent immunotherapy appears to provide modest benefits in advanced BTC. In this review, we summarize the current status of treatment options, including systemic chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and various combinations in advanced BTC.

scholarly journals Targeted Therapies in Type II Endometrial Cancers: Too Little, but Not Too Late

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (8) ◽  
pp. 2380 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michiel Remmerie ◽  
Veerle Janssens
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Targeted Therapies ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Therapeutic Potential ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Genetic Alterations ◽  
Mitogen Activated Protein Kinase ◽  
Type I ◽  
Type Ii

Type II endometrial carcinomas (ECs) are responsible for most endometrial cancer-related deaths due to their aggressive nature, late stage detection and high tolerance for standard therapies. However, there are no targeted therapies for type II ECs, and they are still treated the same way as the clinically indolent and easily treatable type I ECs. Therefore, type II ECs are in need of new treatment options. More recently, molecular analysis of endometrial cancer revealed phosphorylation-dependent oncogenic signalling in the phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase (PI3K) and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways to be most frequently altered in type II ECs. Consequently, clinical trials tested pharmacologic kinase inhibitors targeting these pathways, although mostly with rather disappointing results. In this review, we highlight the most common genetic alterations in type II ECs. Additionally, we reason why most clinical trials for ECs using targeted kinase inhibitors had unsatisfying results and what should be changed in future clinical trial setups. Furthermore, we argue that, besides kinases, phosphatases should no longer be ignored in clinical trials, particularly in type II ECs, where the tumour suppressive phosphatase protein phosphatase type 2A (PP2A) is frequently mutated. Lastly, we discuss the therapeutic potential of targeting PP2A for (re)activation, possibly in combination with pharmacologic kinase inhibitors.

scholarly journals Beyond KRAS: Practical Molecular Targets in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Albert Grinshpun ◽  
Yonaton Zarbiv ◽  
Jason Roszik ◽  
Vivek Subbiah ◽  
Ayala Hubert
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Targeted Therapy ◽  
Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Targeted Therapies ◽  
Kras Mutation ◽  
Molecular Targets ◽  
Driver Mutations ◽  
Proof Of Concept ◽  
Genomic Analyses ◽  
Variable Success

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a grim prognosis. Molecular and genomic analyses revealed that the striking majority of these tumors are driven by KRAS mutation, currently not amenable to targeted therapy. However, other driver mutations were found in a small fraction of patients. Herein we report of 3 cases of patients with metastatic PDAC and wildtype KRAS, found to harbor BRAF or RET pathogenic alterations. The patients were treated with targeted therapies with variable success. In our opinion, those proof-of-concept cases argue in favor of additional research and clinical trials’ effort in this small but significant PDAC population with uncommon driver mutations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document