scholarly journals Significance of Lauren Classification in Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant/Perioperative Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancers—Analysis from a Large Single Center Cohort in Germany

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 290 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebekka Schirren ◽  
Alexander Novotny ◽  
Christian Oesterlin ◽  
Julia Slotta-Huspenina ◽  
Helmut Friess ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Median Survival ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Multivariate Regression Analysis ◽  
Perioperative Chemotherapy ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Lauren Histotype ◽  
Mixed Types

Background: the purpose of this analysis was to analyze the outcomes of multimodal treatment that are related to Lauren histotypes in gastro-esophageal cancer (GEC). Methods: patients with GEC between 1986 and 2013 were analyzed. Uni- and multivariate regression analysis were performed to identify predictors for overall survival. Lauren histotype stratified overall survival (OS)-rates were analyzed by the Kaplan–Meier method. Further, propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance for confounders. Results: 1290 patients were analyzed. After PSM, the median survival was 32 months for patients undergoing primary surgery (PS) and 43 months for patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCTx) ahead of surgery. For intestinal types, median survival time was 34 months (PS) vs. 52 months (nCTx+surgery) p = 0.07, 36 months (PS) vs. (31) months (nCTx+surgery) in diffuse types (p = 0.44) and 31 months (PS) vs. 62 months (nCTx+surgery) for mixed types (p = 0.28). Five-/Ten-year survival rates for intestinal, diffuse, and mixed types were 44/29%, 36/17%, and 43/33%, respectively. After PSM, Kaplan–Meier showed a survival benefit for patients undergoing nCTx+surgery in intestinal and mixed types. Conclusion: the Lauren histotype might be predictive for survival outcome in GEC-patients after neoadjuvant/perioperative chemotherapy.

scholarly journals Histopathologic Response Is a Positive Predictor of Overall Survival in Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant/Perioperative Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancers—Analysis from a Large Single Center Cohort in Germany

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. 2244
Author(s):  
Rebekka Schirren ◽  
Alexander Novotny ◽  
Helmut Friess ◽  
Daniel Reim
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Multivariate Regression Analysis ◽  
Perioperative Chemotherapy ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Histopathologic Response ◽  
Lauren Histotype

There is conflicting evidence regarding the efficacy of neoadjuvant/perioperative chemotherapy (NCT) for gastro-esophageal cancer (GEC) on overall survival. This study aimed to analyze the outcomes of multimodal treatments in a large single center cohort. We performed a retrospective analysis of patients treated with NCT, followed by intended curative oncological surgery for locally advanced gastric cancer. Uni- and multivariate regression analysis were performed to identify the predictors of overall survival. From over 3000 patients, 702 eligible patients were analyzed. In the univariate analysis clinical stage, application of preoperative PLF, requirement of surgical extension, UICC-stage, grading, R-status, Lauren histotype, and HPR were the prognostic survival factors. In multivariate analysis PLF regimen, UICC-stages, R-status, Lauren histotype, and histopathologic regression (HPR) were significant predictors of overall survival. Overall HPR-rate was 26.9%. HPR was highest in the cT2cN0 stage (55.9%), and lowest in the cT3/4 cN+ stage (21.6%). FLOT demonstrated the highest HPR (37.5%). Independent predictors for HPR were the clinical stage and grading. Kaplan Meier analyses demonstrated significant survival benefits for the responding patients (p < 0.0001). HPR after NCT was an important prognostic factor to predict overall survival for locally advanced GEC. FLOT should be the preferred regimen in patients undergoing NCT ahead of surgery.

scholarly journals Novel Histologic Categorization Based on Lauren Histotypes Conveys Prognostic Information for Gastroesophageal Junction Cancers—Analysis from a Large Single Center Cohort in Germany

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 1303
Author(s):  
Rebekka Schirren ◽  
Alexander Novotny ◽  
Julia Slotta-Huspenina ◽  
Helmut Friess ◽  
Daniel Reim
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Oncologic Outcomes ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Siewert Type ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Prognostic Groups ◽  
Lauren Histotype ◽  
Mixed Types

Adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction (AEG) ranks among the most common cancers in the Western world with increasing incidence. However, the prognostic influence and applicability of the Lauren classification was not examined in detail before. The purpose of this analysis was to analyze the oncologic outcomes of GE-junction cancer related to the Lauren histotype in a large single center cohort. Data from the prospectively documented database of the Klinikum Rechts der Isar (TUM School of Medicine) for patients undergoing curatively intended oncologic resection for GE-junction cancer between 1984 and 2018 were extracted. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to identify predictors for overall survival. Kaplan-Meier analyses were done to investigate the survival rates according to the Lauren histotype. After identification of two distinct histologic categories with prognostic implications, propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance for confounders and evaluate its oncologic outcomes retrospectively. In the time period indicated, 1710 patients were treated for GE-junction cancer. Exclusion criteria were: R2-resections (n = 134), metastatic disease (n = 296), 30-day mortality (n = 45), Siewert type I (n = 21), and missing/incomplete data (n = 61). Finally, 1153 patients were analyzed. In a multiple variable analysis, age, UICC-stage, all Lauren histotypes, R-stage, and postoperative complications were significant predictors of overall survival. Kaplan Meier analysis demonstrated significant survival differences between intestinal, diffuse, and mixed Lauren-histotypes (p = 0.001 and p = 0.029). Survival rates were comparable between non-classifiable and intestinal Lauren-types (p = 0.16) and between diffuse and mixed types (p = 0.56). When combining non-classifiable, well, and moderately differentiated Lauren-types and combining poorly differentiated intestinal, diffuse, and mixed types, two highly prognostic groups were identified (p < 0.0001). This was confirmed after PSM for possible confounders. The Lauren histotypes demonstrate highly prognostic value after oncologic resection of GE-junction cancer (Siewert type II and type III) in a single center Western patient cohort. A simplified histotype classification based on Lauren subtypes revealed a clear distinction of prognostic groups and should be considered for further evaluation.

Patterns of radiotherapy and its impact on survival in patients with locally advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: Before and after the publication of the MAGIC trial.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 125-125
Author(s):  
Chi Lin ◽  
Abhijeet Bhirud ◽  
Nathan Ronald Bennion
Keyword(s):  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Tumor Resection ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Multivariate Regression Analysis ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Impact On Survival ◽  
Postoperative Chemoradiation

125 Background: The intergroup 0116 trial for locally advanced gastric (GA) and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GEJA) established postoperative chemoradiation therapy as the standard of care. However, since the publication of the MAGIC trial in 2006, some physicians prefer perioperative chemotherapy rather than postoperative chemoradiation. The goal of this study is to examine the use of radiotherapy (RT) and its impact on survival in patients diagnosed 3 years prior to and after the publication of the MAGIC trial. Methods: Patients with stage T2-4 or N+ and M0 GA (3339) or GEJA (1868) diagnosed between 2004 and 2009 who have had a primary tumor resection with at least 3 years of follow up were identified from the SEER database. Regression models were used to analyze factors influencing the use of RT and its effect on survival. Kaplan Meier plots and log-rank tests were used for survival comparisons. Results: From 2004 to 2009, there was no change in the ratio of RT/no RT. About 33% of patients with GA and 53% with GEJA received RT. Multivariate regression analysis showed that patients with T2-3 disease, N+ disease, and younger patients were more likely to receive RT in both GA and GEJA. The median follow-up for GA and GEJA, was 73 and 68 months and median survivals of 27 and 26 months respectively. RT improved median survivals from 20 to 46 months for GA and from 20 to 31 months for GEJA (p < 0.0001). After adjusting for stage and age, patients who received RT had higher odds of surviving 3 years or longer for both GA (OR 2.20, 95% CI 1.86-2.60) and GEJA (OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.19-1.80). Further analysis revealed that RT improved survivals in patients diagnosed either before or after 2006 for both GA and GEJA. Conclusions: The publication of MAGIC trial in 2006 has not affected the patterns of using RT on locally advanced GA or GEJA. Patients who did not receive RT after 2006 continue to have worse survival rates compared to those who have had RT. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the effect of combining the MAGIC chemotherapy regimen and RT on survival and quality of life of these patients.

scholarly journals Efficacy of perioperative chemotherapy for synovial sarcoma: a retrospective analysis of a Nationwide database in Japan

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gang Xu ◽  
Hisaki Aiba ◽  
Norio Yamamoto ◽  
Katsuhiro Hayashi ◽  
Akihiko Takeuchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Synovial Sarcoma ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Surgical Margin ◽  
Oncologic Outcomes ◽  
Wide Resection ◽  
Perioperative Chemotherapy ◽  
Relapse Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Distant Relapse

Abstract Background Synovial sarcoma is an aggressive but chemosensitive soft-tissue tumor. We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy of perioperative chemotherapy for synovial sarcoma with data from the nationwide database, Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor Registry in Japan. Methods This study included 316 patients diagnosed with synovial sarcoma between 2006 and 2012. Oncologic outcomes were analyzed using a Cox-hazard regression model. Moreover, the effects of perioperative chemotherapy on outcomes were evaluated using a matched-pair analysis. The oncologic outcomes of patients who did or did not receive chemotherapy were compared (cx + and cx-). Results Multivariate analysis revealed significant correlations of age (over 40, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.61, p = 0.043), margin status (marginal resection, HR = 0.18, p < 0.001 and intralesional resection, HR = 0.30, p = 0.013 versus wide resection) with overall survival; surgical margin type (marginal resection, HR = 0.14, p = 0.001 and intralesional resection, HR = 0.09, p = 0.035 versus wide resection) with local recurrence; and postoperative local recurrence (HR = 0.30, p = 0.027) and surgical margin (marginal resection, HR = 0.31, p = 0.023 versus wide resection) with distant relapse-free survival. Before propensity score matching, perioperative chemotherapy was mainly administered for young patients and patients with deeper tumor locations, larger tumors, more advanced-stage disease, and trunk location. The 3-year overall survival, local control, and distant relapse-free survival rates were 79.8%/89.3% (HR = 0.64, p = 0.114), 89.6%/93.0% (HR = 0.37, p = 0.171) and 71.4%/84.5% (HR = 0.60, p = 0.089) in the cx+/cx- groups, respectively. After propensity score matching, 152 patients were selected such that the patient demographics were nearly identical in both groups. The 3-year overall survival, local control, and distant relapse-free survival rates were 71.5%/86.0% (HR = 0.48, p = 0.055), 92.5%/93.3% (HR = 0.51, p = 0.436) and 68.4%/83.9% (HR = 0.47, p = 0.046) in the cx+/cx- groups, respectively. Conclusion This large-sample study indicated that the margin status and postoperative disease control were associated directly or indirectly with improved oncologic outcomes. However, the efficacy of perioperative chemotherapy for survival outcomes in synovial sarcoma patients was not proven in this Japanese database analysis.

Phase II trial of perioperative chemotherapy + avelumab in locally advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: Preliminary results.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4046-4046
Author(s):  
Thierry Alcindor ◽  
Touhid Opu ◽  
Arielle Elkrief ◽  
Farzin Khosrow-Khavar ◽  
Carmen L. Mueller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Tumor Regression ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Daily Intake ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Type I ◽  
Perioperative Chemotherapy ◽  
Preliminary Results ◽  
Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma

4046 Background: Perioperative chemotherapy improves cure rate in locally advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA), and immune checkpoint inhibitors are active at the metastatic stage. This trial tests the hypothesis that the addition of avelumab to perioperative chemotherapy will increase the major pathologic response (MPR) rate in comparison with historical controls. Methods: Phase II study of avelumab + chemotherapy (docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-FU or mDCF) given every 2 weeks for 4 cycles before and after surgery. Main inclusion criteria: GEA, cT3 and/or cN+, M0, WHO PS 0-1. Main exclusion criteria: use of immunosuppressants, serious autoimmune disease, daily intake >10 mg prednisone. Staging studies: CT, PET-CT, endoscopic ultrasound, diagnostic laparoscopy. Surgical resection: D2 lymphadenectomy, en-bloc esophagectomy for type I/II gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) tumors. Aim of the study: MPR as defined as tumor regression grades 0-1 (modified Ryan scheme); as per hypothesis, this experimental regimen will result in a 20% rate of MPR, compared with 7% with chemotherapy alone. Simon 2-stage design: if less than 2 MPR are seen in the first 16 patients, the study will be closed. The study hypothesis cannot be rejected if at least 6 MPR are seen in the first 50 patients. All adverse effects are prospectively recorded per CTCAE guidelines in patients who have received at least one treatment cycle. Survival rates are calculated with Kaplan-Meier method. Preliminary results are presented since the study has met its primary endpoint. Results: Feb 2018-Feb 2020: 28 patients enrolled (25 M/3 F, age 45-78). Location: GEJ (23), stomach (5). Staging: cT3 (25), cT4 (1), cN+ (20). Biomarkers expression: mismatch repair (MMR) protein loss (3/28); PD-L1(clone 73-10) expression in 1% (TPS) or more of tumor cells seen in 12/28 samples, and >10% in 6 patients. Grade 3 toxicity: stomatitis (2/28); nausea (2/28); vomiting (1/28); diarrhea (1/28); hypothyroidism (1/28); arthralgia (3/28); neutropenia (1/28). Grade 4 toxicity: pneumonia (1/28); neutropenia (2/28). Postoperative 30-day mortality: 0%. One patient was excluded from efficacy analyses for M1 staging; 27 patients underwent surgery, 26 with R0 (96%). Six cases (22%) show MPR: 3 grade 0 (11%) and 3 grade 1 (11%) tumor regressions. No correlation was seen between MMR proteins or PD-L1 expression and tumor regression. With a median follow-up of 1.5 years (range 0.4-2.5), the disease-free survival rate is projected to be 0.92 (95% CI 0.83-1.00) at 12 months and 0.77 (95% CI 0.58-1.00) at 24 months. Conclusions: The combination of mDCF chemotherapy with Avelumab demonstrates a promising safety and activity profile. Ongoing laboratory investigations are underway to correlate our findings with tumor molecular features before exposure to treatment. Clinical trial information: NCT03288350.

scholarly journals Multi-modal Ultrasonic Diagnosis and Prognosis for Primary Thyroid Lymphoma Invasiveness

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chenjuan Peng ◽  
Chen Yang ◽  
Jincao Yao ◽  
LingYan Zhou ◽  
Jingjing Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Poor Prognosis ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Thyroid Lymphoma ◽  
Diagnosis And Prognosis ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Primary Thyroid Lymphoma ◽  
Ultrasonic Images ◽  
Mixed Types ◽  
Thyroid Capsule

Abstract Objective Sixty-nine patients with primary thyroid lymphoma (PTL) were evaluated for diagnostic value and prognosis for PTL invasiveness. Methods We retrospectively (2008–2019) analyzed multi-modal ultrasonic images and clinical characteristics from pathologically confirmed PTL patients. These patients were divided into aggressive PTL(n=46) and indolent PTL(n=23). Results Age(>70 years old) and elevated LDH (lactase dehydrogenase) were statistically different clinical features between aggressive and indolent PTL. From ultrasonic images, 34 cases were nodular, 11 diffused, and 24 mixed. Mixed types displayed high invasiveness (45.7%) while diffuse types displayed higher inertness (39.1%), and differences were statistically significant (P = 0.000). Elastography, invaded thyroid capsule and increased chaotic vascularity also showed significant differences between aggressive and indolent PTL. We observed statistical difference in OS(overall survival rates) between aggressive and indolent PTL(p=0.032). Single factor Kaplan-Meier (K-M) analysis showed that: age > 70 years old, aggressive pathology, Ki67>30%, elastography scored >3 were positively correlated with the risk of poor prognosis of PTL (P < 0.05).Conclusions Multi-modal ultrasound provides accurate ultrasonographic information, e.g., ultrasound patterns, elastography, invaded thyroid capsules, and hypervascularity, which facilitates PTL invasiveness diagnostics for improved clinical treatment. In addition, PTL patients with age > 70 years old, aggressive pathology, Ki67>30%, elastography scored >3 are more likely to have poor prognosis.

scholarly journals OR25-07 A Multi-Center, Open-Label, Pivotal Phase 2 Study of Azedra® (HSA I-131-MIBG) in Patients with Unresectable, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pheochromocytoma or Paraganglioma: Updated Long-Term Survival and Safety

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Camilo Jimenez ◽  
Bennett B Chin ◽  
Richard B Noto ◽  
Joseph Stephen Dillon ◽  
Lilja B Solnes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Survival Time ◽  
Median Survival ◽  
Median Survival Time ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Pivotal Phase ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Phase 2 Study ◽  
Therapeutic Doses

Abstract Background: Pheochromocytoma/Paraganglioma (PPGL) are rare neuroendocrine tumors with a 5-yr survival rate as low as 12%. There is a high unmet medical need for effective treatment options for patients with advanced disease. AZEDRA®, a high-specific-activity iodine-131 meta-iodobenzylguanidine (HSA I-131-MIBG), is the first and only FDA-approved therapeutic radiopharmaceutical agent indicated for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients with iobenguane scan positive, unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic PPGL who require systemic anticancer therapy. Methods: Patients with advanced PPGL who were heavily pre-treated and were ineligible for curative surgery or chemotherapy received a dosimetric dose followed by up to two therapeutic doses (each at 296 MBq/kg to a max of 18.5 GBq). The primary endpoint, defined as the proportion of patients with at least 50% reduction of all antihypertensive medication(s) lasting ≥6 months, was met and previously reported. Updated secondary endpoints including overall survival (OS) and safety are reported. Results: A dosimetric dose of HSA I-131-MIBG was administered to 74 patients. Of those, 68 patients received one therapeutic dose and 50 received two doses of HSA I-131-MIBG. Clinical benefit rates (objective tumor responses defined by RECIST 1.0 and stable disease) were observed in 71.4% and 98.0% of patients receiving one and two therapeutic doses, respectively. As of October 10, 2019, median survival time for all patients was 43.2 months (95% CI 31.4, &gt;60). Median survival time was 19.3 months (95% CI 4.5, 32.4) and 49.1 months (95% CI 36.9, &gt;60) in patients receiving one and two doses, respectively. The overall survival was 73.8% at 2 yrs, 47.5% at 4 yrs and 41.5% at 5 yrs. The most common (≥50%) adverse events were nausea, fatigue, and myelosuppression. Myelosuppressive events resolved within 4-8 wks without requiring stem cell transplantation. Late radiation toxicity included 7 patients with secondary malignancies (myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), acute myeloid leukemia (AML), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), colon cancer, and lung carcinoma) of which MDS, ALL and AML were considered related to I-131 radiotherapy. Conclusions: Results from this pivotal phase 2 study suggest that HSA I-131-MIBG is an efficacious and safe treatment for advanced PPGL.

Association of total neoadjuvant therapy with favorable clinical outcomes in patients with locally advanced esophageal and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas (LA-GEJ CA).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 231-231
Author(s):  
Lauren Jurkowski ◽  
Aditya Varnam Shreenivas ◽  
Sakti Chakrabarti ◽  
Mandana Kamgar ◽  
James P. Thomas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Metabolic Imaging ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Curative Intent

231 Background: Both peri-operative chemotherapy and neoadjuvant chemoradiation have been shown to improve outcomes in patients (pts) with LA-GEJ CA compared to surgery alone. Rates of post-operative chemotherapy delivery remain suboptimal. Total neo-adjuvant therapy (TNT) in LA-GEJ CA - induction chemotherapy (IC) followed by concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) - may improve systematic delivery of neoadjuvant therapy and result in favorable clinical outcomes. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 135 pts with LA-GEJ CA at our institution between 2/2007 and 11/2019; pertinent clinical data were abstracted with Institutional Review Board approval. Patients treated with IC and curative-intent CRT with ≥40 Gy dose of radiation for adenocarcinoma were included in this analysis (N = 59). Doublet or triplet IC regimens utilizing 5-Flurouracil(5-FU), Cisplatin/Oxaliplatin and Docetaxel were commonly administered while combinations of Carboplatin +Paclitaxel or 5-FU + Oxaliplatin were used in CRT. Clinical complete response (CCR) was defined as metabolic imaging and endoscopic biopsies negative for residual malignancy after completion of TNT. Patients were followed from diagnosis to recurrence and overall survival. Survival probabilities were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between groups using a log-rank test. Results: Out of 59 evaluable pts, 69% were clinical stage T3, 71% were node positive. 37 pts (63%) underwent surgery, R0 resection rate was 89% (33/37), pathologic complete response (pCR) rate was 19% (7/37). Among the pts who did not undergo surgery, 41% (9/22) opted to forego surgery since they attained a CCR. For the entire cohort, median Disease-Free Survival (mDFS), median Overall Survival (mOS), and 3-yr OS were 2.4 yrs, 4.7 yrs, and 67% respectively. Pts who did not undergo surgery had a mDFS, mOS, and 3-yr OS of 1.5 yrs, 4.2 yrs, and 59% respectively. Median DFS, mOS, and 3-yr OS of patients who underwent surgery were 3.5 yrs, 5.8 yrs and 72% respectively. Patients who achieved a CCR and opted to forego surgery (N = 9) had a 3 -yr DFS of 42% vs 83% for pts (N = 7) who demonstrated a pCR after curative intent tri-modality therapy. (P = 0.0099) Interestingly, the same group that achieved CCR and opted out of surgery had 3yr OS of 89% vs 83% of those who demonstrated a pCR (p = 0.0042). Conclusions: TNT for pts with LA-GEJ CA is associated with high rates of R0 resection as well as excellent DFS and OS compared to historical controls, warranting prospective evaluation. The remarkable DFS and OS in patients who opted to forego surgery due to achieving CCR is reflective of the local and systemic control rendered by this approach. Careful characterization and close longitudinal follow-up of patients who achieve CCR may help identify a subgroup of LA-GEJ CA pts who may benefit from surgery sparing approaches.

scholarly journals CheckMate-032 Study: Efficacy and Safety of Nivolumab and Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in Patients With Metastatic Esophagogastric Cancer

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (28) ◽  
pp. 2836-2844 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yelena Y. Janjigian ◽  
Johanna Bendell ◽  
Emiliano Calvo ◽  
Joseph W. Kim ◽  
Paolo A. Ascierto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
The United States ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Programmed Death Ligand 1 ◽  
Programmed Death ◽  
Esophagogastric Cancer

Purpose Metastatic esophagogastric cancer treatments after failure of second-line chemotherapy are limited. Nivolumab demonstrated superior overall survival (OS) versus placebo in Asian patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancers. We assessed the safety and efficacy of nivolumab and nivolumab plus ipilimumab in Western patients with chemotherapy-refractory esophagogastric cancers. Patients and Methods Patients with locally advanced or metastatic chemotherapy–refractory gastric, esophageal, or gastroesophageal junction cancer from centers in the United States and Europe received nivolumab or nivolumab plus ipilimumab. The primary end point was objective response rate. The association of tumor programmed death-ligand 1 status with response and survival was also evaluated. Results Of 160 treated patients (59 with nivolumab 3 mg/kg, 49 with nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg, 52 with nivolumab 3 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg), 79% had received two or more prior therapies. At the data cutoff, investigator-assessed objective response rates were 12% (95% CI, 5% to 23%), 24% (95% CI, 13% to 39%), and 8% (95% CI, 2% to 19%) in the three groups, respectively. Responses were observed regardless of tumor programmed death-ligand 1 status. With a median follow-up of 28, 24, and 22 months across the three groups, 12-month progression-free survival rates were 8%, 17%, and 10%, respectively; 12-month OS rates were 39%, 35%, and 24%, respectively. Treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events were reported in 17%, 47%, and 27% of patients in the three groups, respectively. Conclusion Nivolumab and nivolumab plus ipilimumab demonstrated clinically meaningful antitumor activity, durable responses, encouraging long-term OS, and a manageable safety profile in patients with chemotherapy-refractory esophagogastric cancer. Phase III studies evaluating nivolumab or nivolumab plus ipilimumab in earlier lines of therapy for esophagogastric cancers are underway.

Pediatric Patients with Adrenal Neuroblastoma: A SEER Analysis, 2004–2013

2020 ◽  
Vol 86 (2) ◽  
pp. 127-133
Author(s):  
Shengxiang Chen ◽  
Wenfeng Tang ◽  
Randong Yang ◽  
Xiaoxiao Hu ◽  
Zhongrong Li
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Survival Difference ◽  
Tumor Management ◽  
End Results

Adrenal neuroblastoma (NB) is a relatively common malignancy in children. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was used to present demographic data and a survival analysis with the aim of making tumor management better. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was used to search pediatric patients (age £16 years) with NB from 2004 to 2013. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the overall survival. And, we used Cox regression analysis to determine hazard ratios for prognostic variables. Independent prognostic factors were selected into the nomogram to predict individual's three-, five-, and seven-year overall survival. The study included a total of 1870 pediatric patients with NB in our cohort. Overall, three-, five-, and seven-year survival rates for adrenal NB were 0.777, 0.701, and 0.665, respectively, whereas the rates for nonadrenal NB were 0.891, 0.859, and 0.832, respectively. The multivariate analysis identified age >1 year, no complete resection (CR)/CR, radiation, and regional/distant metastasis as independent predictors of mortality for adrenal NB. Concordance index of the nomogram was 0.665 (95% confidence interval, 0.627–0.703). Pediatric patients with adrenal NB have significantly worse survival than those with nonadrenal NB. Adrenal NB with age <1 year, treated with surgery, no radiation, and localized tumor leads to a better survival. There was no survival difference for patients to receive CR and no CR.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document