scholarly journals Using Exome Sequencing to Improve Prediction of FOLFIRINOX First Efficacy for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. 1851
Author(s):  
Julie Lecuelle ◽  
Anne Aarnink ◽  
Zoé Tharin ◽  
Caroline Truntzer ◽  
François Ghiringhelli
Keyword(s):  
Exome Sequencing ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Prognostic Score ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Copy Number Variant ◽  
Clinical Score ◽  
Tumor Stage ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
First Line

Purpose: The first line treatment of advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cancer (PDAC) comprises a FOLFIRINOX regimen for most patients with good performance status. However, no biomarker to predict efficacy is currently available. We investigated whether exome sequencing could be used to predict progression-free and overall survival in patients undergoing FOLFIRINOX for PDAC. Methods: In this single-center observational study, we included 78 patients with advanced PDAC who underwent somatic and germline exome analyses during first line therapy with FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine. Exome-derived variables associated with outcome were then used in Cox regression models to generate a composite biomarker. Results: Performance status, tumor stage, liver metastasis, and lung metastasis were retained to generate a prognostic clinical score associated with overall and progression-free survival. Clonality, ploidy, and copy number variant (CNV) signatures 1 and 5, as well as gene variants in the calcium, non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ), and spliceosome pathways, were retained to generate a genomic prognostic score. The addition of genomic score improved the prediction of prognosis compared to the clinical score alone. Conclusions: This study underlines that structural and pathway genomic features could be used to predict FOLFIRINOX survival in patients with advanced PDAC.

scholarly journals Complete Radiologic Response of Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma to Microwave Ablation Combined with Second-Line Palliative Chemotherapy

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Hakon Blomstrand ◽  
Karin Adolfsson ◽  
Per Sandström ◽  
Bergthor Björnsson
Keyword(s):  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Palliative Chemotherapy ◽  
Lung Metastases ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Disease Recurrence ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a bleak prognosis, especially for the majority of patients diagnosed with metastatic disease. The primary option for palliative treatment is chemotherapy, and responses beyond first-line treatment are rare and typically short. Here, we report a case of a 63-year-old woman with PDAC in the head of the pancreas who was initially successfully treated by pancreaticoduodenectomy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine. However, disease recurrence with liver and para-aortic lymph node metastases was detected only two months after the completion of adjuvant chemotherapy. First-line palliative chemotherapy with gemcitabine-nab/paclitaxel was commenced. The results were discouraging, with disease progression (liver and lung metastases) detected at the first evaluation; the progression-free survival was just two months (64 days). Surprisingly, the response to second-line palliative chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil-oxaliplatin was excellent; in combination with the ablation of a liver metastasis, this treatment regimen resulted in a complete radiological response and an 11-month treatment-free interval with a sustained good performance status.

Efficacy and safety of FOLFIRINOX in elderly patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15729-e15729
Author(s):  
Jae Hyup Jung ◽  
Jingu Kang ◽  
Jong-Chan Lee ◽  
Jin-Hyeok Hwang
Keyword(s):  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Elderly Group ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
First Line ◽  
Tertiary Teaching ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

e15729 Background: Although FOLFIRINOX showed improved efficacy in advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA), physicians still hesitate to administrate FOLFIRINOX in elderly patients despite of being in a good performance status. We investigated the efficacy and toxicity of FOLFIRINOX in elderly patients with advanced PDA. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed electronic medical records of advanced PDA patients administrated a first-line FOLFIRINOX from January 2012 to July 2017 in a single tertiary teaching hospital. All the patients were divided into two groups: non-elderly group A (age < 70) and elderly group B (age≥70). Overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS) and toxicities were compared between two groups using Cox proportional hazard model. Results: A total of 214 patients (Group A 176; B 38) met the eligible criteria. Median age was 61 years old (29-80, group A 59; B 73) and median cycle of FOLFIRINOX was 7.0 (1–75, group A and B 7.0). Median OS and PFS did not differ between group A and B (OS, 11.8 vs 12.0 months, hazard ratio [HR] 1.165, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.785–1.728; PFS 6.5 vs 7.3 months, HR 1.003, 95% CI 0.694–1.451, respectively). When we analyzed OS according to tumor stage (locally advanced and metastatic), group A and B showed comparable median OS (15.8 vs 13.5 months in locally advanced PDA; 8.6 vs 9.8 months in metastatic PDA, respectively) There were no significant differences in terms of hematologic toxicities except Gr 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia (Group A 3.4%; B 13.2%, P = 0.028). Fatigue and diarrhea were observed more often in Group B than in group A (47.4% vs 10.2%, P = 0.000; 18.4% vs 4.5%, P = 0.010, respectively), all of which were manageable. More patients in group B received dose adjusted FOLFIRINOX than in group A, although there was no statitical significance. Conclusions: FOLFIRINOX could be considered as the first-line chemotherapy for elderly patients with advanced PDA as well as non-elderly patients when dosage modified appropriately, given comparable efficacies and acceptable and manageable toxicities. More studies are warranted to confirm this issue.

Safety and efficacy of chemotherapy in older adults with locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 654-654 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorena Ostios-Garcia ◽  
Patricia Saade ◽  
Joseph Elan Grossman ◽  
Leanne Lanniello ◽  
Andrea J. Bullock
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Exact Test ◽  
Univariate Analyses

654 Background: PDAC is often diagnosed in patients (pts) ≥75yrs. However, older adults comprise a small proportion of subjects in prospective trials, and there is little reported on the safety and efficacy of chemotherapy in this population. Methods: Records were reviewed on all pts ≥75yrs treated with chemotherapy for locally advanced and metastatic PDAC at a single institution from April 2010 - March 2018. Response rate (RR), progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicities were compared among the different regimens, and among pts < or ≥80yrs. Survival was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank test. Univariate analyses were performed by Fisher’s exact test and multivariate analyses by a Cox-regression model to identify factors associated with PFS and OS in this population. Results: 67 pts were treated, median age 81yrs (range: 75-90), stage III (34, 51%) and IV (33, 49%). Chemotherapy regimens included: gemcitabine alone (39), gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (17), gemcitabine/vinorebine (1), FOLFOX (8) and FOLFIRINOX (2). 59 (88%) pts required dose adjustments due to toxicity; no differences by age or regimen. RR, PFS, and OS did not differ by age or regimen (Table), although sample size was small. Age >80yrs was associated with reduced PFS (p 0.03). On univariate analyses liver metastases and performance status (PS)>1 were associated with reduced OS; PS>1 was associated with reduced OS on multivariate analysis. Conclusions: Among pts with locally advanced and metastatic PDAC ≥75yrs, there were no differences in RR, PFS or OS by chemotherapy regimen. PS was the only variable associated with reduced OS. Older adults with PS 0-1 are likely to benefit from chemotherapy for non-resectable PDAC.[Table: see text]

Nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine versus FOLFIRINOX in the first-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A national cohort (Comunica-TTD working group).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15707-e15707
Author(s):  
Federico Longo ◽  
Oscar Alfredo Castillo Trujillo ◽  
Juan José Serrano Domingo ◽  
Roberto Martin Huertas ◽  
Elena Corral de la Fuente ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
First Line ◽  
National Cohort ◽  
Secondary Objective ◽  
Cox Analysis

e15707 Background: Advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly lethal disease with a five-year overall survival (OS) of less than 5%. Folfirinox and Nab-Paclitaxel plus Gemcitabine (NabPacGem) are the most active treatments in the first-line (1L). The decision to use Folfirinox or NabPacGem is a matter of debate. Methods: A retrospective cohort of advanced PDAC patients treated from January 2011 to May 2018 in four Spanish institutions was analyzed. The principal objective was to compare OS among patients receiving Folfirinox versus NabPacGem in 1L. Progression-free survival (PFS) was a secondary objective. Results: Characteristics of 251 patients included: median age 66.6 years; male 54.4%; stage IV at diagnosis 66.7%; ECOG 0/1/2 18/70/12%; treated with Folfirinox 18.3% and NabPacGem 81.7%. Patients treated with Folfirinox versus NabPacGem were younger (median age 58.3 vs. 67.9; p<0.001) and had lower ECOG (0/1/2 of 46/54/0% vs. 13/71/16%; p<0.001). Univariate analysis: median PFS 5.8 months (95%CI, 4.3 – 7.3) for Folfirinox and 4.2 months (95%CI, 3.7 – 5.2) for NabPacGem, HR=1.53 (95%CI, 1.1 – 2.1; p=0.012); median OS 12.7 months (95%CI, 8.4 – 14.3) for Folfirinox and 7.6 months (95%CI, 5.8 – 8.8) for NabPacGem, HR=1.38 (95%CI, 0.96 – 1.98; p=0.081). Multivariate Cox analysis (including type of treatment, ECOG and age) showed that ECOG was the only variable associated with PFS and OS (Table). Conclusions: In our study, advanced PDAC patients treated with Folfirinox were younger and had a better performance status than those treated with NabPacGem. We found no differences in survival between both treatments when adjusting by ECOG and age.[Table: see text]

Clinical Outcomes and Safety of Patients Treated with NAb-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: The NAPA Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (11) ◽  
pp. 887-895 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martina Catalano ◽  
Giandomenico Roviello ◽  
Raffaele Conca ◽  
Alberto D’Angelo ◽  
Valeria Emma Palmieri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Performance Status ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Hematological Toxicity ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Ecog Ps ◽  
Prognostic And Predictive Markers

Background: The phase III MPACT trial demonstrated the superiority of gemcitabine (Gem) combined with Nab-paclitaxel (Nab-P) versus gemcitabine alone in previously untreated patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of Gem/Nab-P in routine clinical practice. Methods: From January 2015 to December 2018, patients with metastatic PDAC receiving firstline treatment with a combination of gemcitabine and Nab-paclitaxel were included in a multicentre retrospective observational study. Exploratory analyses of efficacy, and prognostic and predictive markers, were performed. Results: The cohort comprised 115 patients (median age 65 [range 50-84] years) with good performance status (ECOG PS 0-1). The median overall survival (OS) was 11 months (95% CI; 9-13) and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6 months (95% CI 5-7). Partial response and stable disease were achieved in 44 and 30 patients, respectively, yielding an overall disease control rate (DCR) of 64.3%. Grade 3-4 hematological toxicity frequency was 22.61% for neutropenia, 5.22% for anemia, and 3.48% for thrombocytopenia. Grade 3 asthenia was recorded in 2.61% of patients. No grade 4 non-hematological events were reported. Dose reduction was necessary in 51.3% of the patients. Conclusions: Our results confirm the efficacy and safety of a first-line regimen comprising gemcitabine and Nab-paclitaxel in metastatic PDAC in a real-life population.

Hyaluronan heterogeneity in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, primary tumors, and sites of metastasis.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16231-e16231
Author(s):  
Veronica Placencio-Hickok ◽  
Marie Lauzon ◽  
Natalie Moshayedi ◽  
Michelle Guan ◽  
Sungjin Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Liver Metastasis ◽  
Regression Model ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
High Status ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Pdac Tissue ◽  
Treatment Naïve

e16231 Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most aggressive cancers with an estimated five-year survival rate of 10%. The dense desmoplastic stroma in PDAC contributes to its aggressive nature and treatment resistance. Among the components comprising the stroma, hyaluronan (HA) has been demonstrated to play a critical role in tumor progression and survival. Previous preliminary studies have suggested differences in HA expression in primary and metastatic foci in PDAC. However, the effects of treatment and location of HA expression as well as the role of CD44, a known receptor for HA, on HA as a biomarker signature remain unknown. Thus, we investigated the potential of HA as a biomarker in primary PDAC and metastases. Methods: PDAC tissue from primary (n = 43) and metastatic (n = 66) sites were obtained from Cedars-Sinai Medical Center along with associated clinical data. Tissue slides were stained with H&E, HA using a histochemical assay, and CD44 by immunohistochemistry. HA staining was scored according to the proportion of stromal staining at an intensity greater than the background stroma. HA status was defined as ≥ 50% staining being HA high and < 50% as being HA low. CD44 staining was recorded as an H-score (percentage of tumor cells staining multiplied by intensity of staining on a scale from 0 to 3). Associations between HA levels and the requested variables were examined with t-test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, Chi-squared test, Fisher’s exact test, or Cox regression model where appropriate. Kaplan-Meier curves were created to assess progression free survival and overall survival. Analyses were performed using SAS 9.4 with two-sided tests and a significance level of 0.05. Results: HA score was significantly higher in primary PDAC tissue compared to sites of metastases (p = 0.0148). Within the metastases, HA score was significantly higher in liver metastasis compared to other sites of metastasis (p = 0.0478). In the liver metastasis tissue, HA score trended lower in patients with previously treated tissue compared to treatment naïve tissue (p = 0.0622). In the treatment naive liver metastasis cohort, patients with HA high status had decreased progression free survival and overall survival compared to patients with HA low status (p = 0.0032 and p = 0.0478, respectively). Using HA score and CD44 in a Cox regression model demonstrated that for every one unit increase in HA score, the risk for recurrence/progression increased by 4.4% at any fixed point in time, adjusting for CD44 score (p = 0.0049). Conclusions: HA score is variable between primary PDAC, PDAC metastatic to the liver, and PDAC metastatic to other sites. Within liver metastases, patients with HA high status had decreased progression free survival and overall survival compared to patients with HA low status. HA levels can serve as a potential biomarker to guide pancreatic cancer treatments and trial design for agents targeting the stroma.

First-line nivolumab (NIVO) plus ipilimumab (IPI) plus two cycles of chemotherapy (chemo) versus chemo alone (4 cycles) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Two-year update from CheckMate 9LA.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9000-9000
Author(s):  
Martin Reck ◽  
Tudor-Eliade Ciuleanu ◽  
Manuel Cobo ◽  
Michael Schenker ◽  
Bogdan Zurawski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Expression Level ◽  
First Line ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Grade 3

9000 Background: In the randomized phase 3 CheckMate 9LA trial (NCT03215706), first-line NIVO + IPI combined with 2 cycles of chemo significantly improved overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR) vs chemo alone (4 cycles). Clinical benefit was observed regardless of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression level and histology. Here we report data with 2 years’ minimum follow-up from this study. Methods: Adult patients (pts) with stage IV / recurrent NSCLC, ECOG performance status ≤ 1, and no known sensitizing EGFR/ALK alterations were stratified by PD-L1 (< 1% vs ≥ 1%), sex, and histology (squamous vs non-squamous) and were randomized 1:1 to NIVO 360 mg Q3W + IPI 1 mg/kg Q6W + chemo (2 cycles; n = 361) or chemo alone (4 cycles; n = 358). Pts with non-squamous NSCLC in the chemo-alone arm could receive pemetrexed maintenance. The primary endpoint was OS. Secondary endpoints included PFS and ORR by blinded independent central review, and efficacy by different PD-L1 levels. Safety was exploratory. Results: At a minimum follow-up of 24.4 months for OS (database lock: Feb 18, 2021), pts treated with NIVO + IPI + chemo continued to derive OS benefit vs chemo, with a median OS of 15.8 months vs 11.0 months, respectively (HR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.61–0.86]); 2-year OS rates were 38% vs 26%. Median PFS with NIVO + IPI + chemo vs chemo was 6.7 months vs 5.3 months (HR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.56–0.79]); 8% and 37% of pts who had disease progression received subsequent immunotherapy, respectively. ORR was 38% with NIVO + IPI + chemo vs 25% with chemo. Similar clinical benefit with NIVO + IPI + chemo vs chemo was observed in all randomized pts and across the majority of subgroups, including by PD-L1 expression level (Table) or histology. Any grade and grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 92% and 48% of pts in the NIVO + IPI + chemo arm vs 88% and 38% in the chemo arm, respectively. Conclusion: With 2 years’ minimum follow-up, first-line NIVO + IPI + chemo demonstrated durable survival and benefit versus chemo in pts with advanced NSCLC; no new safety signals were identified. Clinical trial information: NCT03215706. [Table: see text]

Randomized Phase II Trial of First-Line Trastuzumab Plus Docetaxel and Capecitabine Compared With Trastuzumab Plus Docetaxel inHER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 976-983 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew M. Wardley ◽  
Xavier Pivot ◽  
Flavia Morales-Vasquez ◽  
Luis M. Zetina ◽  
Maria de Fátima Dias Gaui ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
First Line ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Grade 3

PurposeTo evaluate trastuzumab (H) and docetaxel (T) with or without capecitabine (X) as first-line combination therapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) -positive advanced breast cancer.Patients and MethodsPatients with HER2-positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer were randomly assigned to H (8 mg/kg loading; 6 mg/kg every 3 weeks) plus T (75 mg/m2in HTX arm, 100 mg/m2in HT arm, every 3 weeks) with or without X (950 mg/m2twice per day on days 1 to 14 every 3 weeks). The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR).ResultsIn 222 patients, median follow-up was approximately 24 months. ORR was high with both regimens (70.5% with HTX; 72.7% with HT; P = .717); complete response rate was 23.2% with HTX compared with 16.4% with HT. HTX demonstrated significantly longer progression-free survival: median 17.9 months compared with 12.8 months with HT (hazard ratio, 0.72; P = .045), which translates to a gain of around 5 months. Two-year survival probability was 75% with HTX compared with 66% with HT. Febrile neutropenia (27% v 15%) and grade 3/4 neutropenia (77% v 54%) incidences were higher with HT than HTX. Treatment-related grade 3 hand-foot syndrome (17% v < 1%) and grade 3/4 diarrhea (11% v 4%) occurred more commonly with HTX than HT. One case of congestive heart failure occurred in each arm.ConclusionHTX is an effective and feasible first-line therapy for HER2-positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer, although it should be reserved for patients with good performance status who are not receiving long-term steroids.

scholarly journals A novel 20-gene prognostic score in pancreatic adenocarcinoma

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Secil Demirkol Canli ◽  
Ege Dedeoglu ◽  
Muhammad Waqas Akbar ◽  
Baris Kucukkaraduman ◽  
Murat Isbilen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Cell ◽  
Prognostic Score ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Cyclin B1 ◽  
Pancreatic Tissue ◽  
Tnm Staging ◽  
Prognostic Indicators ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Primary Tumors ◽  
And Performance

Abstract Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is among the most lethal cancers. Known risk factors for this disease are currently insufficient in predicting mortality. The only FDA approved prognostic biomarker for PDAC patients is CA19-9. This, along with AJCC TNM staging and performance status, are considered important prognostic indicators in clinical practice. In order to better prognosticate patients with PDAC, we identified a novel panel of genes by utilizing publically available microarray and RNAseq data of PDAC tumors from GEO and TCGA. Expression of 20 genes were significantly associated with overall survival in four datasets and event-free survival in TCGA. A score generated based on the expression matrix of these genes could be validated in two independent cohorts. We find that this “Pancreatic cancer prognostic score 20 – PPS20” is dramatically elevated in metastatic tissue compared to primary tumor, and is higher in primary tumors compared to normal pancreatic tissue. Transcriptomic analyses show that tumors with low PPS20 have overall more immune cell infiltration and a higher CD8 T cell/Treg ratio when compared to those with high PPS20. Analyses of proteomic data from TCGA PAAD indicated higher levels of Cyclin B1, RAD51, EGFR and a lower E-cadherin/Fibronectin ratio in tumors with high PPS20. The PPS20 score defines not only prognostic and biological sub-groups but can predict response to targeted therapy options as well. Overall, PPS20 is a stronger and more robust transcriptomic signature when compared to similar, previously published gene lists.

Analysis of chemotherapy efficacy according to histology in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) patients (p).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20563-e20563
Author(s):  
Susana Cedres Perez ◽  
Juan David Assaf Pastrana ◽  
Patricia Iranzo ◽  
Ana Callejo ◽  
Nuria Pardo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factor ◽  
Survival Data ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Asbestos Exposure ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
First Line ◽  
Neutrophil Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

e20563 Background: MPM is a highly aggressive pleural tumor associated with asbestos exposure and with limited survival despite systemic therapy. Histology is a prognostic factor and recently CheckMate 743 trial demonstrated survival benefit of immunotherapy in first line with some differences in the efficacy of chemotherapy according to histology. However, randomized trials who led to the approval of antifolate in mesothelioma did not include analysis of outcomes by histology. The objective of this study is to characterize the impact of chemotherapy according to histology in p with MPM at our institution. Methods: We review 189 MPM p diagnosed at Vall d´Hebron University Hospital between November 2002 and April 2020. Associations between clinical variables and outcome were assessed with Cox regression models and survival data were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Patient’s characteristics: median age 68 years (y) (45-88 y), males: 70%, performance status (PS)1: 69%, asbestos exposure: 75%, epithelioid subtype: 76%. First line chemotherapy was offered to 85% of p (66% cisplatin-pemetrexed and 27% carboplatin-pemetrexed). Median overall survival (OS) in overall population was 21.3 m (95%CI17.2-24.3). Epithelioid histology, PS 0, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio <5 and treatment with cisplatin vs carboplatin were associated with significant improvements in OS (p<0.001). When we analyzed the survival of patients who received first line chemotherapy according to histology, we found that patients with epithelioid tumors had better PFS and OS. Median PFS for p with epithelioid tumors treated with chemotherapy in first line was 4.8 m versus 3.6 months non-epithelioid (HR1.5 CI95% 1.1-2.3; p=0.03). OS of epithelioid p treated with first line chemotherapy was 26.7 m versus 15.0 m non-epithelioid patients (HR2.25 CI95% 1.4-3.4; p<0.001). We analyzed if the differences in survival according to histology were due to type of systemic treatment received (Table). Conclusions: In our series, p with non-epithelioid tumors presented worse prognosis. We confirmed histology is a prognostic factor with better OS for p with epithelioid tumors. Moreover, we demonstrated better efficacy of chemotherapy in epithelioid tumors, although histology is not a predictive factor for the platinum agent sensitivity (p of interaction PFS=0.09, p of interaction OS= 0.65).[Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document