scholarly journals Management of Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma in the Real-Life Setting: Lessons from the French National Hospital Database

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (14) ◽  
pp. 3515
Author(s):  
Christelle de la Fouchardière ◽  
Mustapha Adham ◽  
Anne-Marie Marion-Audibert ◽  
Antoine Duclos ◽  
Claude Darcha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
University Hospitals ◽  
National Hospital ◽  
Curative Intent ◽  
The Real ◽  
Oncological Treatment ◽  
Real Life Setting ◽  
Number Of Patients

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains a major public health challenge, and faces disparities and delays in the diagnosis and access to care. Our purposes were to describe the medical path of PDAC patients in the real-life setting and evaluate the overall survival at 1 year. We used the national hospital discharge summaries database system to analyze the management of patients with newly diagnosed PDAC over the year 2016 in Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes region (AuRA) (France). A total of 1872 patients met inclusion criteria corresponding to an incidence of 22.6 per 100,000 person-year. Within the follow-up period, 353 (18.9%) were operated with a curative intent, 743 (39.7%) underwent chemo- and/or radiotherapy, and 776 (41.4%) did not receive any of these treatments. Less than half of patients were operated in a high-volume center, defined by more than 20 PDAC resections performed annually, mainly university hospitals. The 1-year survival rate was 47% in the overall population. This study highlights that a significant number of patients with PDAC are still operated in low-volume centers or do not receive any specific oncological treatment. A detailed analysis of the medical pathways is necessary in order to identify the medical and territorial determinants and their impact on the patient’s outcome.

scholarly journals Abiraterone in chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a systematic review of ‘real-life’ studies

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 305-315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele Marchioni ◽  
Petros Sountoulides ◽  
Maida Bada ◽  
Sebastiano Rapisarda ◽  
Cosimo De Nunzio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
The Real ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Real Life Setting ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Baseline Psa

Background: To assess the efficacy and safety of treatment with abiraterone acetate (AA) in chemotherapy-naïve men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in the ‘real-life’ setting. Methods: Data acquisition on the outcomes of the use of AA in chemotherapy-naive patients with mCRPC was performed by a MEDLINE comprehensive systematic literature search using combinations of the following key words: ‘prostate cancer’, ‘metastatic’, ‘castration resistant’, ‘abiraterone’, ‘real life’, and excluding controlled clinical trials (phase II and III studies). Identification and selection of the studies was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) criteria. Outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), 12-week 50% reduction in prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and grade 3 and higher adverse events. Data were narratively synthesized in light of methodological and clinical heterogeneity. Results: Within the eight identified studies that fulfilled the criteria, a total of 801 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Baseline PSA ranged between 9.5 and 212.0 ng/ml. Most of the patients had bone metastases. Duration of treatment with AA was longer in the studies with lower baseline PSA levels. The median OS ranged between 14 and 36.4 months. The PFS, assessed according to different definitions, ranged from 3.9 to 18.5 months. A 50% PSA reduction at 12 weeks was reached by a variable percentage of patients ranging from 36.0% to 62.1%. Finally, the rate of grade 3 and higher adverse events was reported in three studies and ranged from 4.4% to 15.5%. Conclusions: Despite the high grade of heterogeneity among studies, treatment with AA seems to ensure good survival outcomes in the ‘real-life’ setting. However, prospective studies based on patients’ characteristics being more similar to ‘real-life’ patients are necessary.

scholarly journals Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma from a surgical perspective

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Adjuvant Treatment ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Historical Background ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Curative Intent ◽  
Pancreatic Cancers ◽  
Operative Care ◽  
Histological Staging

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) accounts for more than 90% of pancreatic cancers. Whilst most patients present with locally advanced or metastatic disease, a minority are candidates for curative-intent resection. This review covers the aspects of PDAC which are relevant to the surgeon. Firstly, an up-to-date overview of epidemiology, risk factors and pathogenesis are provided. Secondly, presentation, diagnosis and staging are covered, including a summary of the most recent staging guidelines. The review will then focus on the historical background of the pancreatico-duodenectomy (PD), the modern procedure and post-operative care. Finally, short sections provide the reader with an update on histological staging and adjuvant treatment.

scholarly journals Omics Approaches in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 1052
Author(s):  
Iranzu González-Boja ◽  
Antonio Viúdez ◽  
Saioa Goñi ◽  
Enrique Santamaria ◽  
Estefania Carrasco-García ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Curative Intent ◽  
Pancreatic Cancers ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Prevention And Treatment ◽  
Shed Light

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, which represents 80% of pancreatic cancers, is mainly diagnosed when treatment with curative intent is not possible. Consequently, the overall five-year survival rate is extremely dismal—around 5% to 7%. In addition, pancreatic cancer is expected to become the second leading cause of cancer-related death by 2030. Therefore, advances in screening, prevention and treatment are urgently needed. Fortunately, a wide range of approaches could help shed light in this area. Beyond the use of cytological or histological samples focusing in diagnosis, a plethora of new approaches are currently being used for a deeper characterization of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, including genetic, epigenetic, and/or proteo-transcriptomic techniques. Accordingly, the development of new analytical technologies using body fluids (blood, bile, urine, etc.) to analyze tumor derived molecules has become a priority in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma due to the hard accessibility to tumor samples. These types of technologies will lead us to improve the outcome of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients.

Phase I/II Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Nanoparticle Albumin-Bound Paclitaxel in Combination With Gemcitabine in Patients With Pancreatic Cancer and an ECOG Performance Status of 2

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 230-238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teresa Macarulla ◽  
Roberto Pazo-Cid ◽  
Carmen Guillén-Ponce ◽  
Rafael López ◽  
Ruth Vera ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Tolerability Profile ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Actuarial Survival ◽  
Number Of Patients

Purpose Gemcitabine plus nanoparticle albumin-bound (NAB) paclitaxel (GA) significantly improved survival compared with gemcitabine alone in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and a Karnofsky performance status (PS) of 70% or greater. Because of the low number of patients with reduced PS, the efficacy of this regimen in fragile patients remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of different GA dosing regimens in patients with a poor PS. Patients and Methods In the phase I part of this study, patients were randomly assigned to one of the following four parallel GA treatment arms (six patients per arm): a biweekly schedule of NAB-paclitaxel (150 mg/m2 [arm A] or 125 mg/m2 [arm C]) plus gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 or a standard schedule of 3 weeks on and 1 week off of NAB-paclitaxel (100 mg/m2 [arm B] or 125 mg/m2 [arm D]) plus gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2. The two regimens with the better tolerability profile on the basis of predefined criteria were evaluated in the phase II part of the study, the primary end point of which was 6-month actuarial survival. Results Arms B and D were selected for the phase II part of the study. A total of 221 patients (111 patients in arm B and 110 patients in arm D) were enrolled. Baseline characteristics including median age (71 and 68 years in arms B and D, respectively), sex (51% and 55% men in arms B and D, respectively), and metastatic disease (88% and 84% in arms B and D, respectively) were comparable between arms. The most frequent grade 3 or 4 toxicities in arms B and D were anemia (12% and 7%, respectively), neutropenia (32% and 30%, respectively), thrombocytopenia (7% and 11%, respectively), asthenia (14% and 16%, respectively), and neurotoxicity (11% and 16%, respectively). In arms B and D, there were no significant differences in response rate (24% and 28%, respectively), median progression-free survival (5.7 and 6.7 months, respectively), and 6-month overall survival (63% and 69%, respectively). Conclusion NAB-paclitaxel administered at either 100 and 125 mg/m2 in combination with gemcitabine on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days is well tolerated and results in acceptable safety and efficacy in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and a poor PS.

scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of erenumab in the real-life setting of S. Antonio Abate Hospital’s Headache Center (Gallarate)

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S2) ◽  
pp. 465-465
Author(s):  
Elisabetta Dalla Valle ◽  
Manlio Di Falco ◽  
Andrea Mancioli ◽  
Simona Corbetta ◽  
Isidoro La Spina
Keyword(s):  
Real Life ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
The Real ◽  
Real Life Setting ◽  
Headache Center
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document