scholarly journals SIOP PNET5 MB Trial: History and Concept of a Molecularly Stratified Clinical Trial of Risk-Adapted Therapies for Standard-Risk Medulloblastoma

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (23) ◽  
pp. 6077
Author(s):  
Martin Mynarek ◽  
Till Milde ◽  
Laetitia Padovani ◽  
Geert O. Janssens ◽  
Robert Kwiecien ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Iii ◽  
Tumour Tissue ◽  
Mycn Amplification ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Molecular Parameters ◽  
Trial History ◽  
Radiotherapy Dose ◽  
Biological Assessments ◽  
Standard Risk ◽  
European Trial

Background. SIOP PNET5 MB was initiated in 2014 as the first European trial using clinical, histological, and molecular parameters to stratify treatments for children and adolescents with standard-risk medulloblastoma. Methods. Stratification by upfront assessment of molecular parameters requires the timely submission of adequate tumour tissue. In the standard-risk phase-III cohort, defined by the absence of high-risk criteria (M0, R0), pathological (non-LCA), and molecular biomarkers (MYCN amplification in SHH–MB or MYC amplification), a randomized intensification by carboplatin concomitant with radiotherapy is investigated. In the LR stratum for localized WNT-activated medulloblastoma and age <16 years, a reduction of craniospinal radiotherapy dose to 18 Gy and a reduced maintenance chemotherapy are investigated. Two additional strata (WNT-HR, SHH-TP53) were implemented during the trial. Results. SIOP PNET5 MB is actively recruiting. The availability of adequate tumour tissue for upfront real-time biological assessments to assess inclusion criteria has proven feasible. Conclusion. SIOP PNET5 MB has demonstrated that implementation of biological parameters for stratification is feasible in a prospective multicentre setting, and may improve risk-adapted treatment. Comprehensive research studies may allow assessment of additional parameters, e.g., novel medulloblastoma subtypes, and identification and validation of biomarkers for the further refinement of risk-adapted treatment in the future.

scholarly journals MPC-08 Molecular risk stratification using genome-wide DNA methylation data of standard-risk medulloblastomas treated with 18-Gy craniospinal irradiation

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. ii12-ii12
Author(s):  
Tomoya Irikura ◽  
Kohei Fukuoka ◽  
Makiko Mori ◽  
Koichi Oshima ◽  
Yuki Arakawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Disease Onset ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Craniospinal Irradiation ◽  
Diagnostic Tools ◽  
Late Relapse ◽  
Mycn Amplification ◽  
Group 4 ◽  
Radiation Induced ◽  
Standard Risk

Abstract A novel risk stratification of medulloblastoma has been proposed based on retrospective data from patients undergoing standard treatment. However, it remains unclear whether the classification is applicable to patients receiving reduced-dose craniospinal irradiation (CSI). We performed molecular diagnosis and copy number analysis using methylation array on patients with standard-risk medulloblastoma treated with 18 Gy CSI at our institution. Nine tumor samples were available for analysis from seven patients who had a median age of 7.4 years at disease onset and a median observation period of 73 months. Three patients had recurrence, and another patient developed radiation-induced glioblastoma. From the three recurrent cases, one was molecularly diagnosed as SHH subtype with MYCN amplification; another case was a Group 4 tumor without favorable prognostic chromosomal aberrations, and the remaining patient experienced a very late relapse despite low-risk stratification. Of the recurrence-free cases, one was classified as WNT subtype, and another was a Group 4 tumor with chromosome 7 gain, and loss of chromosomes 8 and 11, both of which were associated with good prognosis. Methylation analysis also unveiled the fact that the recurrent tumor diagnosed as relapsing medulloblastoma by conventional diagnostic tools was in fact a radiation-induced glioblastoma. Our data suggested that the new risk stratification may be useful for cases treated with CSI reduced to 18 Gy. However, due to the presence of the late-relapsed case stratified to low risk, further investigations with a larger cohort should be required to confirm the data.

Outcome of Children with T-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (T-ALL) and Standard Risk (SR) Features: Results of CCG-1952, CCG-1991 and POG 9404.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 680-680 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yousif Matloub ◽  
B.L. Asselin ◽  
Linda C. Stork ◽  
Meenakshi Devidas ◽  
Harland Sather ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Intensive Therapy ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Phase Iii Trials ◽  
Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Intensified Chemotherapy ◽  
Standard Risk

Abstract Children with T-ALL have generally had a poorer prognosis than patients with precursor-B ALL. Patients with T-ALL are more likely than those with B-precursor ALL to be > 9 years and present with WBC > 50,000/ul, bulky lymphadenopathy and mediastinal mass. Since 1996, the former CCG has stratified protocol eligibility for patients with ALL based on NCI defined Standard Risk (SR = age between 1-9.99 years; WBC < 50,000/ul) or High Risk (HR) groups, regardless of immunophenotype. In contrast, the former POG has treated all T-cell patients on protocols separate from those for precursor-B ALL. This report compares the outcomes among children with T-cell ALL treated on recently completed or ongoing CCG and POG phase III trials for ALL. CCG-1952 enrolled 2176 eligible children with SR ALL between 1996 and 2000; 106 (5%) had T-cell immunophenotype. Treatment was a standard BFM regimen with prednisone and 2 phases of delayed intensification (DI) with a 2x2 randomization of IT methotrexate (MTX) v ITT and MP v TG. From June 2000 to March 2004, CCG-1991 has enrolled 1794 SR ALL patients: 80 (4%) had T-ALL. Treatment included a similar BFM backbone with substitution of dexamethasone and a 2x2 randomization between escalating IV v oral MTX and 1 v 2 DIs. POG-9404 (opened 1996; closed 2001) was developed exclusively for T-cell disease and enrolled 363 patients with T-ALL; 84 (23%) fit the NCI SR group criteria. On the latter protocol, patients received treatment similar to that developed by the Dana-Farber Leukemia Consortium for high risk B-precursor ALL, with randomization to ± 4 cycles of high dose MTX (5 Gm/m2) and leucovorin. All patients on 9404 received 1800 cGy prophylactic cranial radiation while CCG patients did not. Outcome for T-ALL on CCG-1952 is substantially worse than for B-precursor ALL, with 5 year event-free survival (EFS) of 73% compared to 82% (p = 0.007). Interim analysis of CCG-1991 also shows a significantly worse outcome for T-ALL compared to B-precursor ALL: 3y estimated EFS 78% v 90%, p = 0.0002. In contrast, estimated 5y EFS for patients with SR T-ALL on POG-9404 is 88% (90% on the superior high dose MTX regimen). Comparison of the SR v HR T-ALL patients treated on POG 9404 shows a significant advantage for the SR group (5y EFS of 90% v 75%, p < 0.004). This is in contrast to comparison of T-ALL patients on CCG-1952 (SR) v the concurrent CCG-1961 HR study where T-ALL patients have similar outcome (5y EFS 73% v 72%, p = 0.77). These data suggest that patients with T-ALL and SR features have better EFS when treated with more intensified chemotherapy regimens. Because early EFS for T-cell patients treated on CCG-1991 is worse than on POG 9404, the former study was closed to further accrual of patients with T-ALL. The COG ALL Committee is developing a study for exclusive enrollment of patients with T-ALL using intensive therapy based on the current COG HR ALL regimen, regardless of SR or HR features.

An Update on the Role of Thalidomide (THAL) in Total Therapy 2 (TT2) for Newly Diagnosed Patients with Multiple Myeloma (MM): Analysis of Subgroups Defined by Standard Prognostic Factors (SPF) and Gene Expression Profiling (GEP)-Derived Subgroups.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 3389-3389 ◽  
Author(s):  
John D. Shaughnessy ◽  
Jeffrey Haessler ◽  
Jerry Zeldis ◽  
Yongsheng Huang ◽  
Fenghuang Zhan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
And Control ◽  
Standard Risk

Abstract Background: THAL, whose activity in MM was discovered in the setting of advanced and refractory disease in the late 1990’s (Singhal, NEJM, 2000), has become the standard front-line therapy in combination with dexamethasone (DEX). In a randomized phase III tandem transplant trial, TT2, a higher complete response (CR) rate and longer event-free survival (EFS) had been observed on the THAL arm (Barlogie, NEJM, 2006). The similar overall survival (OS) on THAL and control arms had been attributed to the routine use of THAL as salvage therapy for the patients randomized to the No-THAL arm and the shorter post-relapse OS among patients randomized to the THAL arm. Patients and Methods: With a median follow-up on TT2 of 53mo, 107 patients have relapsed and 219 died. Subset analyses were performed to determine whether THAL confers an OS advantage in any subgroup of patients. Results: 6-yr EFS and OS rates are 48%/63% on THAL and 38%/58% on control arm (p=0.01/0.67). Post-relapse OS is now similar with median durations of 5.3mo/4.3mo among control/THAL arms (p=0.11). According to multivariate analyses of 11 standard prognostic factors, EFS was shorter among patients treated without THAL, in the presence of cytogenetic abnormalities (CA), B2M and LDH elevations and low albumin, whereas CR was favorable; OS was inferior with CA, high LDH, low albumin and in patients not receiving 2nd transplant or not achieving CR. Randomization to THAL was beneficial only in the >2 risk factor group: 6-yr OS was 47% in 31 patients on THAL and 12% in 31 control patients (Figure 1, p=0.01). When examined in the context of GEP (70 gene model-based high versus low risk groups) and inter-phase FISH data (amp1q21), available in 260 patients, the 57 with GEP low risk and absence of amp1q21 receiving THAL had 5-yr OS of 90% compared to 74% among 73 controls (p=0.13). Conclusion: With longer follow-up of 53mo on TT2, EFS remains superior among patients randomized to THAL; post-relapse survival is no longer inferior among those randomized to THAL; THAL benefited a high-risk subgroup with >2 standard risk factors, whereas no significant `difference has yet emerged among genetically defined subgroups. Figure Figure

A topotecan-containing induction regimen for treatment of high risk neuroblastoma

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9013-9013 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. R. Park ◽  
C. F. Stewart ◽  
W. B. London ◽  
V. M. Santana ◽  
P. J. Shaw ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Systemic Exposure ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Mycn Amplification ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
C Cycle ◽  
Induction Regimen ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Chemotherapy Agents

9013 Background: We assessed the toxicity and feasibility of adding dose-intensive topotecan and cyclophosphamide to a multi-agent chemotherapy induction regimen for treatment of newly diagnosed high-risk neuroblastoma. Methods: Patients received 2 cycles of topotecan (starting dose 1.2 mg/m2/day for 5 days) and cyclophosphamide (400 mg/m2/day for 5 days) (T/C) followed by an additional 4 cycles of chemotherapy; cisplatin, etoposide alternating with vincristine, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide. Pharmacokinetically guided topotecan dosing (target systemic exposure of AUC 50 - 70 ng/ml*hr determined by single day topotecan lactone levels) was performed. Chemotherapy cycles were scheduled every 21 days, PBSC harvest occurred after T/C cycles and surgical resection of residual primary tumor after cycle 5. Results: Thirty-one patients, 3 with INSS Stage 3 and 28 with Stage 4, were enrolled between April 2004 and November 2005. Median age at diagnosis was 2.5 years (range 0.9 - 9.35 years). Ten of 25 patients had tumor cell MYCN amplification and 21 of 22 tumors were classified as unfavorable Shimada histology by central review. Targeted topotecan systemic exposure was achieved in 87% (27/31) of patients during T/C cycle 1 and in 85% (23/27) of patients during T/C cycle 2. PBSC collections occurred as intended in 95% of patients (21/22 patients), median harvest 30.8 × 106 CD34+cells cell/kg (range 2.24 - 542). No dose limiting toxicities occurred. All patients experienced Grade 3 or 4 hematopoietic toxicity. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 79% (19/24) of patients during T/C cycles and 78% (18/23) of patients during subsequent cycles of induction therapy. Documented infection occurred in 12.5% (3/24) patients during T/C cycles and 26% (6/23) during subsequent induction cycles. Dose intensity of all chemotherapy agents was maintained in 95.8% (23/24) of patients. Conclusions: This pilot induction regimen was well tolerated with expected and reversible toxicities. Dose intensity of standard induction chemotherapy agents was not limited by the addition of dose-intensive topotecan. These data support investigation of efficacy in a Phase III clinical trial for newly diagnosed high-risk neuroblastoma. [Table: see text]

Concordance between abstracts, virtual meeting (VM) presentations, and final publication of phase III clinical trials presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6622-6622 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suneil Kumar Khanna ◽  
Matthew John Boyko ◽  
Daniel Yick Chin Heng ◽  
Michael M. Vickers ◽  
Vincent Channing Tam
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Annual Meeting ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Key Comparisons ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Phase Iii Clinical Trials ◽  
Clinical Trial Results

6622 Background: Phase III clinical trial results described in abstracts in the ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings often differ from final results seen in publication. We hypothesize that the abstracts may act only as place holders, while the results presented at the ASCO Annual Meeting are more highly concordant with the final publication. Methods: A retrospective review of all abstracts submitted to the ASCO Annual Meeting in 2005 to 2007 was conducted. Inclusion Criteria: randomized, prospective phase III clinical trials of greater than 200 patients with at least one quantitative primary endpoint such as OS or PFS. For each abstract, we viewed the VM presentation and searched Pubmed and Medline for the corresponding publications. Data regarding the clinical trials was extracted from all three sources and statistical comparisons were made. Results: A total of 7,900 abstracts were screened from the ASCO 2005 and 2007 Annual Meetings, of which 124 met the inclusion criteria. An additional 43 studies were excluded due to absence of either a VM presentation or publication. The majority (96%) of these trials were presented as either an oral presentation or poster discussion. Key comparisons of the concordance between the abstract or VM presentation and the final publication are shown in the Table below. Conclusions: While the statistical significance of the primary endpoint and conclusions from all three sources are very similar, the results reported in VM presentations at ASCO Annual Meetings are a better representation of the final publication compared to the abstract. When relying on clinical trial results from these meetings to change clinical practice, physicians should refer to the VM presentation rather than the abstract. [Table: see text]

A phase III randomized clinical trial (RCT) of tandem myeloablative autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) using peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) as consolidation therapy for high-risk neuroblastoma (HR-NB): A Children's Oncology Group (COG) study.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA3-LBA3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie R. Park ◽  
Susan G. Kreissman ◽  
Wendy B. London ◽  
Arlene Naranjo ◽  
Susan Lerner Cohn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Mycn Amplification ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Consolidation Therapy ◽  
Pilot Studies ◽  
Stage 4 ◽  
Multicenter Rct

LBA3 Background: ASCT improves event-free survival (EFS) for HR-NB. Pilot studies suggest that intensification of myeloablative therapy using tandem ASCT further improves outcome for HR-NB. We conducted a multicenter RCT comparing tandem vs. single consolidation in patients with HR-NB. Methods: Between 11/2007 and 2/2012, 652 eligible patients (pts) with newly diagnosed HR-NB received induction therapy: 6 cycles of chemotherapy including initial 2 cycles of dose-intensive cyclophosphamide/topotecan followed by PBSC collection. Randomization occurred at end induction to single ASCT with carboplatin-etoposide-melphalan (CEM) or tandem ASCT with thiotepa–cyclophosphamide ASCT followed by a modified CEM (TC:CEM). HR pts with non-MYCN amplified Stage 3 (age>18mos) or Stage 4 (age 12-18 mos) tumors were non-randomly assigned to single ASCT (CEM). EFS and overall survival (OS) were analyzed as intent-to-treat. Results: Median age at study entry was 3.1 yrs, 88% (n=574 pts) had Stage 4 disease and 38.2% (n=249 tumors) had MYCN amplification. A total of 355 pts were randomized (CEM n=179 pts; TC:CEM n=176 pts) and 27 patients were non-randomly assigned to CEM. Of randomized pts, 249 patients received post-consolidation immunotherapy on COG trials. Treatment-related mortality was 2.6% (Induction n=7 [1%]; Consolidation n=10 [2.8%; n=8 CEM, n=2 TC:CEM]). Rates of severe mucosal, infectious or liver toxicities were similar between arms. 3-year EFS and OS from diagnosis were 51.1±2.0% and 68.2±1.9%, respectively. EFS and OS for randomized cohort are shown in the Table. Conclusions: Tandem myeloablative consolidation therapy improves survival probability in patients with high-risk neuroblastoma, especially in the setting in post-consolidative immunotherapy. Clinical trial information: NCT00567567. [Table: see text]

Efficacy of maintenance therapy with zoledronic acid in patients with localized Ewing sarcoma: Report from the international Ewing 2008 trial.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11523-11523
Author(s):  
Uta Dirksen ◽  
Raphael Koch ◽  
Vivek Bhadri ◽  
Bénédicte Brichard ◽  
Trude Butterfass-Bahloul ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Zoledronic Acid ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Ewing Sarcoma ◽  
Adaptive Design ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Type I ◽  
Standard Risk

11523 Background: Ewing 2008R1 (EudraCT2008-003658-13, Sponsor UKM) was conducted in 12 countries. It evaluated the effect of zolendronic acid (ZOL) maintenance therapy on event-free (EFS, primary endpoint) and overall survival (OS) from randomization in standard risk Ewing Sarcoma (EwS). Methods: Phase III, open label, prospective, multi-center, randomized controlled clinical trial. Eligible patients (pts) had localized EwS with either good histological response to induction chemotherapy and/or small tumors ( < 200ml). Pts received 6 cycles VIDE induction and 8 VAI (male) or 8 VAC consolidation (female) and were randomized to receive either 9 cycles of maintenance ZOL or no further treatment (control;ctrl). ZOL cycles started parallel to the 6th consolidation cycle. Randomization was stratified by tumor site (pelvis/no pelvis). Two-sided adaptive inverse-normal 4-stage design, changed after the 1st interim analysis via Müller-Schäfer method. Initial sample size 448 pts, type I error rate 5%, power 80%. Results: 284 pts were randomized between 2009 and 2018 (142 ZOL / 142 ctrl). With a median follow-up of 3.9 years, the primary endpoint EFS was not significantly different between the ZOL and ctrl group in the adaptive design (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.43-1.28, intention to treat). 3-year (3y) EFS rates were 84.0% (95% CI 77.7-90.8%) for ZOL vs 81.7% (95% CI 75.2-88.8%) for ctrl. Results were similar in the per protocol collective. Cause-specific HR for local recurrence in ZOL was csHR 0.30 (95% CI 0.08 -1.09; p = 0.07), for metastatic progress/new metastases csHR 1.0 (CI 0.5-2.2), for combined relapse/progress csHR 0.3 (95% CI 0.1-1.7), for second malignancies csHR 4.0 (95% CI 0.45-36.1) compared to ctrl. The 3y OS was 92.8% (95% CI 88.4-97.5%) for ZOL and 94.6% (95% CI 90.9-98.6%) for ctrl. For ZOL the 5y OS was 87.3% (95% CI 80.7-94.5%) and 89% (95% CI 83.7-95.9%) for ctrl. Noticeable more renal, neurological and gut toxicities were observed for ZOL (p < 0.05), with severe renal toxicities occurring more often in the ZOL arm (p = 0.003). Conclusions: In patients with standard risk localized Ewing Sarcoma there is no benefit from maintenance treatment with zoledronic acid, but significant side effects were observed. Clinical trial information: NCT00987636 .

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document