scholarly journals Identifying Putative Causal Links between MicroRNAs and Severe COVID-19 Using Mendelian Randomization

Cells ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 3504
Author(s):  
Chang Li ◽  
Aurora Wu ◽  
Kevin Song ◽  
Jeslyn Gao ◽  
Eric Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mendelian Randomization ◽  
Independent Study ◽  
Causal Effects ◽  
Summary Statistics ◽  
Expression Data ◽  
Circulating Mirnas ◽  
High Confidence ◽  
Treatment Measures ◽  
Mirna Expression Data ◽  
Eqtl Data

The SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused millions of deaths worldwide. Early risk assessment of COVID-19 cases can help direct early treatment measures that have been shown to improve the prognosis of severe cases. Currently, circulating miRNAs have not been evaluated as canonical COVID-19 biomarkers, and identifying biomarkers that have a causal relationship with COVID-19 is imperative. To bridge these gaps, we aim to examine the causal effects of miRNAs on COVID-19 severity in this study using two-sample Mendelian randomization approaches. Multiple studies with available GWAS summary statistics data were retrieved. Using circulating miRNA expression data as exposure, and severe COVID-19 cases as outcomes, we identified ten unique miRNAs that showed causality across three phenotype groups of COVID-19. Using expression data from an independent study, we validated and identified two high-confidence miRNAs, namely, hsa-miR-30a-3p and hsa-miR-139-5p, which have putative causal effects on developing cases of severe COVID-19. Using existing literature and publicly available databases, the potential causative roles of these miRNAs were investigated. This study provides a novel way of utilizing miRNA eQTL data to help us identify potential miRNA biomarkers to make better and early diagnoses and risk assessments of severe COVID-19 cases.

Psychological factors as the risk factor of mouth ulcers: A two-sample Mendelian randomization study

2021 ◽  
pp. 135910532199969
Author(s):  
Yueqi Shi ◽  
Shaoyi Wang ◽  
Shunying Yu ◽  
Guan Ning Lin ◽  
Weichen Song
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Testing ◽  
Mendelian Randomization ◽  
Oral Care ◽  
Genetic Correlations ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Causal Effects ◽  
Mental Condition ◽  
Summary Statistics ◽  
Protective Effects ◽  
Psychological Traits

To examine whether psychological traits (PT) had causal effects on Mouth Ulcers (MU), we applied two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) to genetics association summary statistics of eleven PT and MU. After the adjustment of outlier variants, genetic correlations and multiple testing, well-being (WB) spectrum PT like life satisfactory (odds ratio [OR] = 0.638 per one standard deviation increment of PT score) had protective effects on MU. Reverse WB traits like neuroticism (OR = 1.60) increased the risk of MU. The lack of well-being characteristics may increase the risk of MU, which highlighted the value of preventive oral care for people who have a reverse mental condition.

scholarly journals A comprehensive evaluation of methods for Mendelian randomization using realistic simulations and an analysis of 38 biomarkers for risk of type 2 diabetes

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guanghao Qi ◽  
Nilanjan Chatterjee
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Mendelian Randomization ◽  
Association Studies ◽  
Real Data ◽  
Causal Effects ◽  
Type I ◽  
Genome Wide Association Studies ◽  
Simulation Studies ◽  
Sample Sizes

Abstract Background Previous studies have often evaluated methods for Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis based on simulations that do not adequately reflect the data-generating mechanisms in genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and there are often discrepancies in the performance of MR methods in simulations and real data sets. Methods We use a simulation framework that generates data on full GWAS for two traits under a realistic model for effect-size distribution coherent with the heritability, co-heritability and polygenicity typically observed for complex traits. We further use recent data generated from GWAS of 38 biomarkers in the UK Biobank and performed down sampling to investigate trends in estimates of causal effects of these biomarkers on the risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D). Results Simulation studies show that weighted mode and MRMix are the only two methods that maintain the correct type I error rate in a diverse set of scenarios. Between the two methods, MRMix tends to be more powerful for larger GWAS whereas the opposite is true for smaller sample sizes. Among the other methods, random-effect IVW (inverse-variance weighted method), MR-Robust and MR-RAPS (robust adjust profile score) tend to perform best in maintaining a low mean-squared error when the InSIDE assumption is satisfied, but can produce large bias when InSIDE is violated. In real-data analysis, some biomarkers showed major heterogeneity in estimates of their causal effects on the risk of T2D across the different methods and estimates from many methods trended in one direction with increasing sample size with patterns similar to those observed in simulation studies. Conclusion The relative performance of different MR methods depends heavily on the sample sizes of the underlying GWAS, the proportion of valid instruments and the validity of the InSIDE assumption. Down-sampling analysis can be used in large GWAS for the possible detection of bias in the MR methods.

scholarly journals Causal Effects of Body Mass Index on Cardiometabolic Traits and Events: A Mendelian Randomization Analysis

2014 ◽  
Vol 94 (2) ◽  
pp. 312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael V. Holmes ◽  
Leslie A. Lange ◽  
Tom Palmer ◽  
Matthew B. Lanktree ◽  
Kari E. North ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Mendelian Randomization ◽  
Causal Effects ◽  
Mendelian Randomization Analysis ◽  
Randomization Analysis ◽  
Cardiometabolic Traits

scholarly journals Causal Inference Between Chronic Periodontitis and Chronic Kidney Disease: A Bidirectional Mendelian Randomization Analysis in a European Population

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jie Yang ◽  
Tianyi Chen ◽  
Yahong Zhu ◽  
Mingxia Bai ◽  
Xingang Li
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Kidney Disease ◽  
Kidney Disease ◽  
Causal Inference ◽  
Causal Relationship ◽  
Instrumental Variables ◽  
Chronic Periodontitis ◽  
Mendelian Randomization ◽  
Association Studies ◽  
Genome Wide Association Studies ◽  
Summary Statistics

BackgroundPrevious epidemiological studies have shown significant associations between chronic periodontitis (CP) and chronic kidney disease (CKD), but the causal relationship remains uncertain. Aiming to examine the causal relationship between these two diseases, we conducted a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis with multiple MR methods.MethodsFor the casual effect of CP on CKD, we selected seven single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) specific to CP as genetic instrumental variables from the genome-wide association studies (GWAS) in the GLIDE Consortium. The summary statistics of complementary kidney function measures, i.e., estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and blood urea nitrogen (BUN), were derived from the GWAS in the CKDGen Consortium. For the reversed causal inference, six SNPs associated with eGFR and nine with BUN from the CKDGen Consortium were included and the summary statistics were extracted from the CLIDE Consortium.ResultsNo significant causal association between genetically determined CP and eGFR or BUN was found (all p > 0.05). Based on the conventional inverse variance-weighted method, one of seven instrumental variables supported genetically predicted CP being associated with a higher risk of eGFR (estimate = 0.019, 95% CI: 0.012–0.026, p < 0.001).ConclusionEvidence from our bidirectional causal inference does not support a causal relation between CP and CKD risk and therefore suggests that associations reported by previous observational studies may represent confounding.

scholarly journals Causal Effect Between Total Cholesterol and HDL Cholesterol as Risk Factors for Chronic Kidney Disease: A Mendelian Randomization Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liu Miao ◽  
Yan Min ◽  
Chuan-Meng Zhu ◽  
Jian-Hong Chen ◽  
Bin Qi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Cholesterol ◽  
Serum Lipid ◽  
Mendelian Randomization ◽  
Causal Effect ◽  
Hdl Cholesterol ◽  
Causal Effects ◽  
Lipid Levels ◽  
Serum Lipid Levels ◽  
Genome Wide ◽  
Mr Study

Abstract Background/Aims: While observational studies show an association between serum lipid levels and cardiovascular disease (CVD), intervention studies that examine the preventive effects of serum lipid levels on the development of CKD are lacking. Methods: To estimate the role of serum lipid levels in the etiology of CKD, we conducted a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study on serum lipid levels. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), which were significantly associated genome-wide with plasma serum lipid levels from the GLGC and CKDGen consortium genome-wide association study (GWAS), including total cholesterol (TC, n = 187365), triglyceride (TG, n = 177861), HDL cholesterol (HDL-C, n = 187167), LDL cholesterol (LDL-C, n = 173082), apolipoprotein A1 (ApoA1, n = 20687), apolipoprotein B (ApoB, n = 20690) and CKD (n = 117165), were used as instrumental variables. None of the lipid-related SNPs was associated with CKD (all P > 0.05). Results: MR analysis genetically predicted the causal effect between TC/HDL-C and CKD. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of TC within CKD was 0.756 (0.579 to 0.933) (P = 0.002), and HDL-C was 0.85 (0.687 to 1.012) (P = 0.049). No causal effects between TG, LDL-C- ApoA1, ApoB and CKD were observed. Sensitivity analyses confirmed that TC and HDL-C were significantly associated with CKD. Conclusions: The findings from this MR study indicate causal effects between TC, HDL-C and CKD. Decreased TC and elevated HDL-C may reduce the incidence of CKD but need to be further confirmed by using a genetic and environmental approach.

scholarly journals Investigating genetic correlations and causal effects between caffeine consumption and sleep behaviours

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorien L. Treur ◽  
Mark Gibson ◽  
Amy E Taylor ◽  
Peter J Rogers ◽  
Marcus R Munafò
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Correlation ◽  
Sleep Duration ◽  
Genetic Variants ◽  
Mendelian Randomization ◽  
Association Studies ◽  
Genetic Correlations ◽  
Causal Effects ◽  
Genome Wide Association Studies ◽  
Caffeine Consumption ◽  
Insomnia Complaints

AbstractStudy Objectives:Higher caffeine consumption has been linked to poorer sleep and insomnia complaints. We investigated whether these observational associations are the result of genetic risk factors influencing both caffeine consumption and poorer sleep, and/or whether they reflect (possibly bidirectional) causal effects.Methods:Summary-level data were available from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) on caffeine consumption (n=91,462), sleep duration, and chronotype (i.e., being a ‘morning’ versus an ‘evening’ person) (both n=128,266), and insomnia complaints (n=113,006). Linkage disequilibrium (LD) score regression was used to calculate genetic correlations, reflecting the extent to which genetic variants influencing caffeine consumption and sleep behaviours overlap. Causal effects were tested with bidirectional, two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR), an instrumental variable approach that utilizes genetic variants robustly associated with an exposure variable as an instrument to test causal effects. Estimates from individual genetic variants were combined using inverse-variance weighted meta-analysis, weighted median regression and MR Egger regression methods.Results:There was no clear evidence for genetic correlation between caffeine consumption and sleep duration (rg=0.000,p=0.998), chronotype (rg=0.086,p=0.192) or insomnia (rg=-0.034,p=0.700). Two-sample Mendelian randomization analyses did not support causal effects from caffeine consumption to sleep behaviours, or the other way around.Conclusions:We found no evidence in support of genetic correlation or causal effects between caffeine consumption and sleep. While caffeine may have acute effects on sleep when taken shortly before habitual bedtime, our findings suggest that a more sustained pattern of high caffeine consumption is likely associated with poorer sleep through shared environmental factors.

scholarly journals Causal Associations Between Blood Lipids and COVID-19 Risk: A Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kun Zhang ◽  
Shan-Shan Dong ◽  
Yan Guo ◽  
Shi-Hao Tang ◽  
Hao Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Cholesterol ◽  
Blood Lipids ◽  
Mendelian Randomization ◽  
Low Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Outcome Data ◽  
Causal Effects ◽  
Lipoprotein Cholesterol ◽  
Global Pandemic ◽  
The Uk

Objective: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a global pandemic caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. It has been reported that dyslipidemia is correlated with COVID-19, and blood lipids levels, including total cholesterol, HDL-C (high-density lipoprotein cholesterol), and LDL-C (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol) levels, were significantly associated with disease severity. However, the causalities of blood lipids on COVID-19 are not clear. Approach and Results: We performed 2-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses to explore the causal effects of blood lipids on COVID-19 susceptibility and severity. Using the outcome data from the UK Biobank (1221 cases and 4117 controls), we observed potential positive causal effects of dyslipidemia (odds ratio [OR], 1.27 [95% CI, 1.08–1.49], P =3.18×10 −3 ), total cholesterol (OR, 1.19 [95% CI, 1.07–1.32], P =8.54×10 −4 ), and ApoB (apolipoprotein B; OR, 1.18 [95% CI, 1.07–1.29], P =1.01×10 −3 ) on COVID-19 susceptibility after Bonferroni correction. In addition, the effects of total cholesterol (OR, 1.01 [95% CI, 1.00–1.02], P =2.29×10 −2 ) and ApoB (OR, 1.01 [95% CI, 1.00–1.02], P =2.22×10 −2 ) on COVID-19 susceptibility were also identified using outcome data from the host genetics initiative (14 134 cases and 1 284 876 controls). Conclusions: In conclusion, we found that higher total cholesterol and ApoB levels might increase the risk of COVID-19 infection.

scholarly journals Education, intelligence and Alzheimer’s disease: Evidence from a multivariable two-sample Mendelian randomization study

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma L Anderson ◽  
Laura D Howe ◽  
Kaitlin H Wade ◽  
Yoav Ben-Shlomo ◽  
W. David Hill ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Alzheimer’S Disease ◽  
Alzheimer's Disease ◽  
Educational Attainment ◽  
Mendelian Randomization ◽  
Causal Effect ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Causal Effects ◽  
Training Interventions ◽  
Bidirectional Relationship ◽  
Years Of Schooling

AbstractObjectivesTo examine whether educational attainment and intelligence have causal effects on risk of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), independently of each other.DesignTwo-sample univariable and multivariable Mendelian Randomization (MR) to estimate the causal effects of education on intelligence and vice versa, and the total and independent causal effects of both education and intelligence on risk of AD.Participants17,008 AD cases and 37,154 controls from the International Genomics of Alzheimer’s Project (IGAP) consortiumMain outcome measureOdds ratio of AD per standardised deviation increase in years of schooling and intelligenceResultsThere was strong evidence of a causal, bidirectional relationship between intelligence and educational attainment, with the magnitude of effect being similar in both directions. Similar overall effects were observed for both educational attainment and intelligence on AD risk in the univariable MR analysis; with each SD increase in years of schooling and intelligence, odds of AD were, on average, 37% (95% CI: 23% to 49%) and 35% (95% CI: 25% to 43%) lower, respectively. There was little evidence from the multivariable MR analysis that educational attainment affected AD risk once intelligence was taken into account, but intelligence affected AD risk independently of educational attainment to a similar magnitude observed in the univariate analysis.ConclusionsThere is robust evidence for an independent, causal effect of intelligence in lowering AD risk, potentially supporting a role for cognitive training interventions to improve aspects of intelligence. However, given the observed causal effect of educational attainment on intelligence, there may also be support for policies aimed at increasing length of schooling to lower incidence of AD.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document