scholarly journals Breast Cancer Heterogeneity

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 1555
Author(s):  
Caterina Fumagalli ◽  
Massimo Barberis

Breast tumor heterogeneity is a major challenge in the clinical management of breast cancer patients. Both inter-tumor and intra-tumor heterogeneity imply that each breast cancer (BC) could have different prognosis and would benefit from specific therapy. Breast cancer is a dynamic entity, changing during tumor progression and metastatization and this poses fundamental issues to the feasibility of a personalized medicine approach. The most effective therapeutic strategy for patients with recurrent disease should be assessed evaluating biopsies obtained from metastatic sites. Furthermore, the tumor progression and the treatment response should be strictly followed and radiogenomics and liquid biopsy might be valuable tools to assess BC heterogeneity in a non-invasive way.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e11574-e11574
Author(s):  
Isis Ching Yeung ◽  
Mark Clemons ◽  
Christina L. Addison ◽  
Brian Hutton ◽  
Xiaofu Zhu ◽  
...  

e11574 Background: Systemic treatment choices for breast cancer patients with recurrent disease are usually based on the ER/PR/Her2 biomarker status of the primary cancer. Biomarker discordance between the primary and metastatic sites is well recognised and could have important therapeutic implications. A systematic review was conducted to assess the extent of biomarker discordance between the primary cancer and metastasis, and whether is influenced by the site of metastasis. Methods: An electronic search of multiple literature databases implemented by an information scientist was conducted to identify studies reporting outcomes of ER/PR/Her2 receptor stability between primary site and recurrent disease. Seven reviewers independently screened the 5034 abstracts and full text articles, which were identified according to pre-defined selection criteria. The same reviewers performed data collection from all included studies. Studies that were identified reported on receptor conversion between primary sites of breast cancer and various sites of metastasis including lymph node, liver, brain, lung, skin, GI sites and bone marrow. Results: Preliminary results from 385 eligible studies consistently demonstrated discordance between the primary and metastatic sites. When discordance occurred, the general trend was for loss of hormone receptor. ER hormone status was more stable (discordance 10.2-32.5%) than PR (discordance 25.5-40.7%). HER2 was found to have lower rates of discordance (2.6-14.5%). In general, higher ER/PR discordance was found in bone (40-68%) and liver (0-54%) when compared to other sites brain (36%), lung (9-18%), skin (6-22%), GI (15-40%). In the prospective studies, biomarker discordance led to change in patient management in up to 20% of the patient population. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that biomarker discordance between primary and distant metastases does occur in breast cancer, occurs more frequently with PR, and the extent of discordance is influenced by the site of metastasis. Further research is required to have a better explanation about the pathophysiology of the biomarker status change and its clinical implications.


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 1918
Author(s):  
Mio Yamaguchi ◽  
Kiyoshi Takagi ◽  
Koki Narita ◽  
Yasuhiro Miki ◽  
Yoshiaki Onodera ◽  
...  

Chemokines secreted from stromal cells have important roles for interactions with carcinoma cells and regulating tumor progression. C-C motif chemokine ligand (CCL) 5 is expressed in various types of stromal cells and associated with tumor progression, interacting with C-C chemokine receptor (CCR) 1, 3 and 5 expressed in tumor cells. However, the expression on CCL5 and its receptors have so far not been well-examined in human breast carcinoma tissues. We therefore immunolocalized CCL5, as well as CCR1, 3 and 5, in 111 human breast carcinoma tissues and correlated them with clinicopathological characteristics. Stromal CCL5 immunoreactivity was significantly correlated with the aggressive phenotype of breast carcinomas. Importantly, this tendency was observed especially in the CCR3-positive group. Furthermore, the risk of recurrence was significantly higher in the patients with breast carcinomas positive for CCL5 and CCR3 but negative for CCR1 and CCR5, as compared with other patients. In summary, the CCL5-CCR3 axis might contribute to a worse prognosis in breast cancer patients, and these findings will contribute to a better understanding of the significance of the CCL5/CCRs axis in breast carcinoma microenvironment.


Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (18) ◽  
pp. 4672
Author(s):  
Banashree Bondhopadhyay ◽  
Sandeep Sisodiya ◽  
Faisal Abdulrahman Alzahrani ◽  
Muhammed A. Bakhrebah ◽  
Atul Chikara ◽  
...  

Despite the recent advancements in therapeutics and personalized medicine, breast cancer remains one of the most lethal cancers among women. The prognostic and diagnostic aids mainly include assessment of tumor tissues with conventional methods towards better therapeutic strategies. However, current era of gene-based research may influence the treatment outcome particularly as an adjunct to diagnostics by exploring the role of non-invasive liquid biopsies or circulating markers. The characterization of tumor milieu for physiological fluids has been central to identifying the role of exosomes or small extracellular vesicles (sEVs). These exosomes provide necessary communication between tumor cells in the tumor microenvironment (TME). The manipulation of exosomes in TME may provide promising diagnostic/therapeutic strategies, particularly in triple-negative breast cancer patients. This review has described and highlighted the role of exosomes in breast carcinogenesis and how they could be used or targeted by recent immunotherapeutics to achieve promising intervention strategies.


ISRN Oncology ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aamir Ahmad

Breast cancer remains a deadly disease, even with all the recent technological advancements. Early intervention has made an impact, but an overwhelmingly large number of breast cancer patients still live under the fear of “recurrent” disease. Breast cancer recurrence is clinically a huge problem and one that is largely not well understood. Over the years, a number of factors have been studied with an overarching aim of being able to prognose recurrent disease. This paper attempts to provide an overview of our current knowledge of breast cancer recurrence and its associated challenges. Through a survey of the literature on cancer stem cells (CSCs), epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), various signaling pathways such as Notch/Wnt/hedgehog, and microRNAs (miRNAs), we also examine the hypotheses that are currently under investigation for the prevention of breast cancer recurrence.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13002-e13002
Author(s):  
Yinghuan Cen ◽  
Chang Gong ◽  
Jun Li ◽  
Gehao Liang ◽  
Zihao Liu ◽  
...  

e13002 Background: We previously demonstrated that BRMS1L (breast cancer metastasis suppressor 1 like) suppresses breast cancer metastasis through HDAC1 recruitment and histone H3K9 deacetylation at the promoter of FZD10, a receptor for Wnt signaling. It is still unclear whether BRMS1L regulates organ-specific metastases, such as bone metastasis, the most prevalent metastatic site of breast cancer. Methods: Examination of the expression of BRMS1L in primary tumors, bone metastatic and other metastatic tissues from breast cancer patients was implemented using qRT-PCR and immunohistochemistry staining. To investigate the mechanism by which BRMS1L drives breast cancer bone metastasis, we tested the mRNA expression by qRT-PCR of a set of potential bone related genes (BRGs) based on PubMed database in MDA-MB-231 cells over expressing BRMS1L and MCF-7 cells knocking-down BRMS1L, and detected the expression of CXCR4 in these established cells by western blot. Transwell assays were performed to assess the migration abilities of breast cancer cells towards osteoblasts. ChIP (Chromatin Immuno-Precipitation) were employed to test the interaction between BRMS1L and CXCR4. Results: At both mRNA and protein levels, the expression of BRMS1L was significantly lower in bone metastatic sites than that in primary cancer tissues and other metastatic sites of breast cancer patients. CXCR4 was screened out in a set of BRGs and negatively correlated with the expression of BRMS1L in breast cancer cell lines. BRMS1L inhibited the migration of breast cancer cells towards osteoblasts through CXCL12/CXCR4 axis. In the presence of TSA treatment, breast cancer cell lines showed an increased expression of CXCR4 in a TSA concentration-dependent manner. In addition, ChIP assays verified that BRMS1L directly bound to the promoter region of CXCR4 and inhibited its transcription through promoter histone deacetylation. Conclusions: BRMS1L mediates the migration abilities of breast cancer cells to bone microenvironment via targeting CXCR4 and contributes to bone metastasis of breast cancer cells. Thus, BRMS1L may be a potential biomarker for predicting bone metastasis in breast cancer.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document