<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Computed tomography (CT) of the chest, although not a screening test or diagnosis of infection with the new coronavirus, has a fundamental role in assessing the extent of lung involvement and complications such as pleural effusion. Considering the higher morbidity and mortality of elderly patients due to this infection, the objective of this study was to evaluate the imaging aspects and clinical correlations of an extreme age (≥80 years) with a confirmed diagnosis for COVID-19. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This was a retrospective and single-center cohort study. CT scans were categorized qualitatively and quantitatively. In the first case, 3 descriptors were used to describe CT findings: “compatible” (findings of greater specificity for COVID-19: opacities with attenuation in ground glass with peripheral and bilateral distribution, with rounded morphology, with or without consolidations, crazy-pavement aspect, inverted halo sign, or organizing pneumonia findings), “doubtful” (findings not specific or unusual for COVID-19: opacities with attenuation in ground glass with nonrounded morphology, central, diffuse, or unilateral distribution, with or without consolidation, lobar or segmental consolidation without ground-glass opacity, small centrilobular nodules with the appearance of “tree-in-bud,” excavations, pleural effusion, and thickening of interlobular septa), and “negative” (absence of pneumonia signs). For the quantitative assessment, which referred to the extent of pulmonary involvement, a tomographic severity classification was used: grade 1 (lung involvement ≤25%), grade 2 (pulmonary involvement between 26 and 50%), and grade 3 (pulmonary involvement >50%). <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 138 patients were evaluated, with an average age of 86.2 years (84 women and 34 men). The mean time interval between onset of symptoms and tomography was 5.63 days. The most prevalent comorbidity was systemic arterial hypertension (81.2%). Compatible, doubtful, and negative tests were 117 (84.7%), 20 (14.4%), and 1 (0.7%), respectively. As for compatible exams, the most common findings were opacities in peripheral ground glass and rounded morphology, followed by crazy paving. The prevalence of pleural effusion was 28.2% and consolidation was 63.7%, and none of these findings were influenced by the duration of symptoms (<i>p</i> = 0.08 and <i>p</i> = 0.2, respectively). The exams classified as grade 1, grade 2, and grade 3 were 57 (41.6%), 46 (33.6%), and 34 (24.8%), respectively. There were statistically significant associations between the classification of tomographic severity and outcomes such as invasive ventilation (<i>p</i> = 0.004), admission to the intensive care unit (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and death (<i>p</i> < 0.001). <b><i>Discussion/Conclusion:</i></b> Our results show that patients ≥80 years old present tomographic manifestations similar to those described for the general population (ground-glass opacities and “crazy paving”) and that the extent of lung involvement is associated with the need for intensive care, invasive ventilation, and death. Although the literature describes an association between the stage of the disease and the appearance of consolidations and pleural effusion, this correlation was not observed in our study, which may suggest that this age-group is more predisposed to the appearance of such findings, typically described in the more advanced stages of infection.
CT-Based Risk Stratification for Intensive Care Need and Survival in COVID-19 Patients—A Simple Solution
