scholarly journals Global Trends in Atherosclerosis Research in the Epigenetics Field: Bibliometric and Visualization Studies

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (24) ◽  
pp. 13154
Author(s):  
Linying Jia ◽  
Ao Cheng ◽  
Naqash Alam ◽  
Yuxuan Qian ◽  
Zeyao Ma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Web Of Science ◽  
Epigenetic Modifications ◽  
Impact Factors ◽  
Qualitative Comparison ◽  
H Index ◽  
Global Trends ◽  
Hereditary Factors ◽  
Prolific Authors ◽  
Atherosclerosis Research ◽  
Epigenetic Research

Atherosclerosis is a pathological vascular state caused by the interaction of environmental and hereditary factors. Epigenetic modifications may be the bridge connecting environmental factors and genetic factors. A search for publications on the Web of Science database in the field of atherosclerosis related to epigenetics was conducted from the earliest mention to December 31, 2020. Data on total and annual publications, citations, impact factors, Hirsch (H)-index, citation times, most prolific authors, and frequently published journals were collected for quantitative and qualitative comparison. A total of 1848 publications related to epigenetics and atherosclerosis were found. The major contributing countries were the China (522, 28.23%), United States (485, 26.23%), and Germany (119, 6.44%). The greatest number of retrieved publications were published in the journal, “Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology” (62, 3.66%). The publication “Oxidative Stress and Diabetic Complications” was cited 2370 times. The most frequent keywords were “DNA methylation” and “LncRNA”. Publications on epigenetic research in the atherosclerosis field have increased significantly every year, indicating that the study of epigenetic modifications plays an increasingly important role in understanding the pathology of atherosclerosis.

Bibliometric analysis of military trauma publications: 2000–2016

2018 ◽  
Vol 164 (3) ◽  
pp. 142-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark L Vickers ◽  
C P Coorey ◽  
G J Milinovich ◽  
L Eriksson ◽  
M Assoum ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Web Of Science ◽  
Blast Injury ◽  
Impact Factors ◽  
Long Term Effects ◽  
H Index ◽  
Military Trauma ◽  
The Usa ◽  
Number Of Publications ◽  
The Uk

IntroductionBibliometric tools can be used to identify the authors, topics and research institutions that have made the greatest impact in a field of medicine. The aim of this research was to analyse military trauma publications over the last 16 years of armed conflict in order to highlight the most important lessons that have translated into civilian practice and military doctrine as well as identify emerging areas of importance.MethodsA systematic search of research published between January 2000 and December 2016 was conducted using the Thompson Reuters Web of Science database. Both primary evidence and review publications were included. Results were categorised according to relevance and topic and the 30 most cited publications were reviewed in full. The h-index, impact factors, citation counts and citation analysis were used to evaluate results.ResultsA plateau in the number of annual publications on military trauma was found, as was a shift away from publications on wound and mortality epidemiology to publications on traumatic brain injury (TBI), neurosurgery or blast injury to the head. Extensive collaboration networks exist between highly contributing authors and institutions, but less collaboration between authors from different countries. The USA produced the majority of recent publications, followed by the UK, Germany and Israel.ConclusionsIn recent years, the number of publications on TBI, neurosurgery or blast injury to the head has increased. It is likely that the lessons of recent conflicts will continue to influence civilian medical practice, particularly regarding the long-term effects of blast-related TBI.

scholarly journals Global Research on Osteosarcoma, 1999–2019: A Bibliometric and Visual Analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Han Wu ◽  
Baixing Wei ◽  
Yuanpei Cheng ◽  
Yongbo Li
Keyword(s):  
Visual Analysis ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
The United States ◽  
Current Status ◽  
H Index ◽  
Global Trends ◽  
Basic Characteristics ◽  
Number Of Publications ◽  
Number Of Citations ◽  
Research Hotspots

Abstract Background Osteosarcoma is a primary malignant bone tumor that occurs in children and adolescents. Increasing numbers of scholars have studied its development and treatment. To fully understand the current status of osteosarcoma research and global trends therein, we performed a bibliometric and visual analysis of osteosarcoma studies published between 1999 and 2019. Methods We searched the Web of Science database for publications on osteosarcoma. The basic characteristics of this sample of publications, such as H indices, annual outputs, languages of publication, and authors, journals, institutions, and countries of origin, were determined. Co-citation, collaboration, and keyword co-occurrence were analyzed using CiteSpace software. Results The sample comprised 16,934 articles. The number of publications increased annually. H indices and total numbers of citations were far higher for articles from the United States than for those from other countries. Among institutions, the largest proportion of articles originated from Shanghai Jiaotong University. R. Gorlick was the author with the highest H index and total number of citations. Oncology Letters published the largest number of articles and Cancer Research was the most frequently cited journal. The five most frequently appearing keywords were “osteosarcoma,” “cancer,” “expression,” “apoptosis,” and “metastasis.” The analysis generated 10 major clusters of keywords and 23 clusters of co-cited references. Conclusions The findings of this study have guiding significance for researchers seeking cooperating institutions and partners for osteosarcoma research, popular journals and important literature in the field, an understanding of the knowledge base for this research, and up-to-date identification of research hotspots and trends. Keywords: osteosarcoma, bibliometric, citespace, visual analysis, co-citation

The integrated interventional radiology match: a bibliometric analysis of matched first-year residents

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vishnu Chandra ◽  
Neil Jain ◽  
Pratik Shukla ◽  
Ethan Wajswol ◽  
Sohail Contractor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interventional Radiology ◽  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Impact Factors ◽  
Index Number ◽  
Research Information ◽  
H Index ◽  
Scopus Database ◽  
Journal Impact

Objectives: The integrated interventional radiology (IR) residency has only been established relatively recently as compared to other specialties. Although some preliminary information is available based on survey data five, no comprehensive bibliometric analysis documenting the importance of the quantity and quality of research in applying to an integrated-IR program currently exists. As the first bibliometric analysis of matched IR residents, the data obtained from this study fills a gap in the literature. Materials and Methods: A list of matched residents from the 2018 integrated-IR match were identified by contacting program directors. The Scopus database was used to search for resident research information, including total publications, first-author publications, radiology-related publications, and h-indices. Each matriculating program was categorized into one of five tiers based on the average faculty Hirsch index (h-index). Results: Sixty-three programs and 117 matched residents were identified and reviewed on the Scopus database. For the 2018 cycle, 274 total publications were produced by matched applicants, with a mean of 2.34 ± 0.41 publication per matched applicant. The average h-index for matched applicants was 0.96 ± 0.13. On univariate analysis, the number of radiology-related publications, highest journal impact factor, and h-index were all associated with an increased likelihood of matching into a higher tier program (P < 0.05). Other research variables displayed no statistical significance. All applicants with PhDs matched into tier one programs. Conclusions: Research serves as an important element in successfully matching into an integrated-IR residency. h-index, number of radiology-related manuscripts, and highest journal impact factors are all positively associated with matching into a higher tier program.

Units of measurement

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gianfranco Pacchioni
Keyword(s):  
Impact Factor ◽  
Impact Factors ◽  
H Index ◽  
Units Of Measurement ◽  
Pros And Cons ◽  
Eugene Garfield ◽  
Citation Metrics

This chapter discusses how performance is measured in science, such as through the role of citation metrics. Next, the chapter discusses the pros and cons of bibliometric indexes, and of ‘impact factor’, which was introduced by Eugene Garfield in 1955 but not widely used until twenty years later. The various ways that journals attempt to improve their impact factors, and how this will affect science, are also examined. Besides impact factor, the role played by indicators in evaluating scientists, such as the recently introduced h-index, is explored. Finally, fashions and trends in science are touched upon, illustrated with personal anecdotes from the author.

scholarly journals Depicting developing trend and core knowledge of hip fracture research: a bibliometric and visualised analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Guanrong Peng ◽  
Zhenhua Guan ◽  
Yunfei Hou ◽  
Jiaxiang Gao ◽  
Wenqun Rao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Disease Burden ◽  
Perioperative Management ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
High Morbidity ◽  
Core Knowledge ◽  
H Index ◽  
Cooperative Relationships ◽  
Developing Trend ◽  
Number Of Citations

Abstract Background Hip fracture is common and carries high morbidity and mortality; thus, it has become a vital concern. We aim to analyse the present status, worldwide trends in hip fracture and state of clinical research. Methods Publications from 2000 to 2019 were retrieved from the Web of Science database and analysed using a bibliometric methodology. VOSviewer software was utilised for analysis. Results In total, 6139 publications were included, and publications increased annually from 152 in 2000 to 592 in 2019. U.S. researchers have produced the most publications, the highest H-index and the greatest number of citations. Osteoporosis International has published the most papers on the topic. Leading researchers, contributing institutions, their cooperative relationships and scientific masterpieces have been identified. The publications can be divided into five clusters: ‘mortality’, ‘surgical management’, ‘rehabilitation’, ‘osteoporosis’ and ‘epidemiology’. A clear developing trend was described, which began with fracture epidemiology and prevention, transitioned to perioperative management, orthogeriatric care and patient safety and then to functional recovery, disease burden and national audits in recent times. Conclusions Hip fractures result in conditions that extend far beyond orthopaedics concerning epidemiology and preventive medicine, internal medicine and endocrinology, as well as critical care and gerontology. Interest, research and publications are on the rise.

A Scientometric Mapping of Contributions to Journal of Computer Science and Technology during 2012-2016

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-56
Author(s):  
Vimlesh Patel
Keyword(s):  
Growth Rate ◽  
Computer Science ◽  
Geographical Distribution ◽  
Growth And Development ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Science And Technology ◽  
Authorship Pattern ◽  
Chinese Academy Of Sciences ◽  
Prolific Authors ◽  
Academy Of Sciences

The paper presents a Scientometrics mapping of papers published inJournal of Computer Science and Technology, during 2012 to 2016 as reflected in Web of Science database. It attempts to analyze the growth and development of publications output of Journal of Computer Science and Technologyas reflected. Data for a total of 485 have been downloaded and analysed according to objectives. The study reveals thatThe year wise growth rate revel that highest no. papers published in 2015, No. of Papers: 106 (21.86%) Authorship pattern data reveals that most of the authors like to publish papers in collaborations and most preferred authorship pattern was four author i.e. no. publications for four authors were 125 (25.77 %). The Degree of Collaboration (DC) revel that DC is found highest in 0.95 Co-Authored Publication. The highly prolific authors and their publications revel that Zhang L, published highest numbers of papers (11 nos.), the geographical distribution contributions (International) is revel that Peoples R China is in the top with no. of publications is 371 (76.50%), it is found from institution-wise distribution of papers that highest contributed institutions was Chinese Academy of Sciences with 93 Publications (19.18%) is placed at 1st rank and the average of citations per year (2012-2016) were 205.

scholarly journals ANÁLISIS BIBLIOMETRICO DE LAS TESIS DOCTORALES ESPAÑOLAS EN ARTES MARCIALES Y PUBLICACIONES CIENTÍFICAS DE SUS AUTORES

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 367 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vicenç Hernández González ◽  
Nuria Sans-Rosell ◽  
Joaquin Reverter-Masia ◽  
Carme Jové-Deltell
Keyword(s):  
Web Of Science ◽  
H Index

O objetivo é verificar se a obtenção do título de Doutor é um fator que promove a formação de novos investigadores. Apresentar o índice h dos doutores-autores, bem como a relação que existe com as medidas utilizadas para avaliar a produtividade da pesquisa, como número de artigos e índice de citações. Mediante o banco de dados TESEO e a Web of Science obteve-se os registros do trabalho. Os resultados mostraram um total de 86 teses (2,2 teses/ano), mais de 285 trabalhos na Web of Science, com uma média de 5,81 trabalhos/autor. O número médio de consultas por trabalho é de 4,25, enquanto o número de consultas por autor é de 24,73. O índice geral h-index é 2.02 por autor. Concluímos baixa produção de teses de doutorado em Espanha em artes marciais. Mais de metade dos autores doutores-autores publicam trabalhos na Web of Science com notável difusão científica de suas teses. 

scholarly journals Research evaluation of author’s citation-based performance through the relative author superiority index

2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 191-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guillermo Armando RONDA-PUPO
Keyword(s):  
Web Of Science ◽  
Research Evaluation ◽  
H Index ◽  
Isi Web Of Science ◽  
High Citation ◽  
Group Evaluation ◽  
Percentile Rank ◽  
Citation Indexes ◽  
Applied Microbiology ◽  
The Impact

Abstract The aim of this paper is to further explore the recent conversation about the indicators for research evaluation through citation-based indexes. It evaluates the Cuban Biotechnology; Applied Microbiology researchers’ citation-based performance, according to their scientific production in journals of the ISI Web of Science database through the Relative Author Superiority Index. The methodology comprises six steps: (1) preparation of the data; (2) calculation of the Percentile Rank Index for each of the papers; (3) calculation of the Author Superiority Index for each of the authors; (4) Calculation of the Relative Author Superiority Index; (5) Comparison of the Author Superiority Index of each author to their Hirsch (H) and G citation indexes and (6) individual or group evaluation of the citation-based performance. The findings suggest that the group of Cuban researchers in biotechnology achieved a high citation-based performance within the analyzed period. The results show the effectiveness of this index to assess the citation performance of individual or group researchers when the impact factor of the researcher or group under evaluation is not high. In addition, the Relative Author Superiority index could be complementary to other previous indicators such as H-index, G-index or citation counts as it overcomes the limitations of the age of publications, length of the author’s career, and the self-citation problem that are present in other indicators.

scholarly journals Наукометричний аналіз публікаційної активності науковців ДУ «Інститут ендокринології та обміну речовин ім. В.П. Комісаренка НАМН України» за даними наукометричної бази даних Web of Science

2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-75
Author(s):  
M.D. Tronko ◽  
I.P. Pasteur
Keyword(s):  
Core Collection ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
H Index

Мета — наукометричний аналіз публікаційної активності науковців ДУ «Інститут ендокринології та обміну речовин ім. В.П. Комісаренка НАМН України» (далі — Інститут) за даними наукометричної бази даних Web of Science. Матеріал і методи. Метод дослідження — наукометричний аналіз наукових публікацій за даними наукометричної бази даних Web of Science. Об’єктом дослідження були всі публікації науковців Інституту за даними Web of Science Core Collection, а предметом дослідження — кількість публікацій, індекс Хірша (h-index), кількість бібліографічних посилань на публікації та кількість статей із бібліографічними посиланнями на публікації (загальна кількість і кількість без самоцитування). Результати. Станом на 01.11.2019 року в штаті Інституту налічувалося 79 науковців, із них 18 із науковим ступенем доктора наук, 41 — кандидата наук і 20 без наукового ступеня. Усі доктори наук були в базі даних Web of Science Core Collection, і середнє значення індексу Хірша для їх групи становило приблизно 6,2 пункту. Серед кандидатів наук у базі даних був 31 науковець (75,6% від загальної кількості із цим ступенем), а середнє значення індексу Хірша для їх групи становило майже 1,4 пункту (у 16 кандидатів наук цей індекс становив 0). У базі даних були також 8 науковців без наукового ступеня (40,0% від загальної кількості без ступеня), проте середнє значення індексу Хірша для їх групи перевищувало 2,2 пункту (у 4 науковців цей індекс становив 0). У цілому по Інституту 57 науковців (72,2% від загальної кількості) були в базі даних Web of Science Core Collection і мали індекс Хірша, середнє значення якого дещо перевищувало 3,0 пункти. За всіма показниками беззаперечними лідерами є науковці М.Д. Тронько та Т.І. Богданова, індекс Хірша яких становить відповідно 32 і 31 пункти. Висновок. У науковців Інституту є достатній потенціал для суттєвого поліпшення власних наукометричних показників за даними наукометричної бази Web of Science Core Collection.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document